Research Article
Print
Research Article
Melicope stonei, section Pelea (Rutaceae), a new species from Kaua‘i, Hawaiian Islands: with notes on its distribution, ecology, conservation status, and phylogenetic placement
expand article infoKenneth R. Wood‡, Marc S. Appelhans§|, Warren L. Wagner|
‡ National Tropical Botanical Garden, Kalāheo, United States of America
§ University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| Smithsonian Institution, Washington, United States of America

Corresponding author: Kenneth R. Wood ( kwood@ntbg.org )

Academic editor: Pedro Acevedo-Rodríguez
© 2017 Kenneth R. Wood, Marc S. Appelhans, Warren L. Wagner.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation: Wood KR, Appelhans MS, Wagner WL (2017) Melicope stonei, section Pelea (Rutaceae), a new species from Kaua‘i, Hawaiian Islands: with notes on its distribution, ecology, conservation status, and phylogenetic placement. PhytoKeys 83: 119-132. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.83.13442
Open Access

Abstract

Melicope stonei K.R. Wood, Appelhans & W.L. Wagner (section Pelea, Rutaceae), a new endemic tree species from Kaua‘i, Hawaiian Islands, is described and illustrated with notes on its distribution, ecology, conservation status, and phylogenetic placement. The new species differs from its Hawaiian congeners by its unique combination of distinct carpels and ramiflorous inflorescences arising on stems below the leaves; plants monoecious; leaf blades (5–)8–30 × (4–)6–11 cm, with abaxial surface densely tomentose, especially along midribs; and very long petioles of up to 9 cm. Since its discovery in 1988, 94 individuals have been documented and are confined to a 1.5 km2 region of unique high canopy mesic forest. Melicope stonei represents a new Critically Endangered (CR) single island endemic species on Kaua‘i.

Keywords

Rutaceae , Melicope , M. section Pelea, new species, conservation, Hawaiian Islands, Kaua‘i, Critically Endangered

Introduction

The genus Melicope J.R. Forst. & G. Forst. consists of ca. 235 species of shrubs and trees with a distribution that ranges from the Malagasy and Indo-Himalayan regions in the east to the Hawaiian and Marquesan Islands in the west and from Nepal, southern China, Taiwan and the Japanese Ogasawara Islands in the north to New Zealand and Australia in the south (Hartley 2001, Appelhans et al. 2014a, Wood et al. 2016a). With the inclusion of Melicope stonei K.R. Wood, Appelhans & W.L. Wagner, the total number of recognized Melicope reported for the Hawaiian Islands totals 50 endemic species, making Melicope the most species-rich radiation of woody plants throughout the archipelago (Hillebrand 1888, Hartley and Stone 1989, Wagner et al. 1999, Wood et al. 2016a). Molecular phylogenetic studies indicate that the Hawaiian species arose from a single introduction, and that the Hawaiian genus Platydesma H. Mann is nested within Melicope section Pelea (A. Gray) Hook. f. as sister to the Hawaiian species of Melicope (Harbaugh et al. 2009, Appelhans et al. 2014b, c). To preserve the monophyly of Melicope sect. Pelea, Platydesma must be merged with Melicope and when those new combinations are validly published, Hawaiian Melicope will then be increased by an additional four species.

In the most current systematic revision by Hartley (2001)Melicope was subdivided into four sections: Lepta (Lour.) T.G. Hartley; Melicope; Pelea; and Vitiflorae T.G. Hartley. Only sect. Lepta proved to be a monophyletic group in a recent molecular study (Appelhans et al. 2014b). All Hawaiian species of Melicope are members of sect. Pelea, which consists of 86 species almost exclusively restricted to Melanesia and the Pacific region. Pelea previously was recognized at the genus rank with the Hawaiian species subdivided into four sections in the revision by Stone (1969): Apocarpa B.C. Stone; Cubicarpa B.C. Stone; Megacarpa B.C. Stone; and Pelea (Wagner et al. 1999). The classification needs to be revised since the sectional classification of Hartley (2001) would require the Hawaiian groups to be treated as subsections if it is appropriate to continue recognizing them at all. Within these four Hawaiian groups only the Hawaiian Pelea group proved to be monophyletic (Appelhans et al. 2014c).

Methods

All measurements were taken from dried herbarium specimens and field notes and are presented in the descriptions as follows: length × width, followed by units of measurements (mm or cm). The authors have examined all specimens cited. The extent of occurrence and area of occupancy for Melicope stonei was calculated by using ArcMap 10.2 in relation to coordinates recorded while collecting herbarium specimens or making field observations.

Taxonomic treatment

Melicope stonei K.R.Wood, Appelhans & W.L.Wagner, sp. nov.

urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77164681-1
Figs 1, 2A–F

Diagnosis

Differs from Hawaiian congeners by its combination of distinct carpels and ramiflorous inflorescence; plants monoecious; leaf blades (5–)8–30 × (4–)6–11 cm, with abaxial surface tomentose, especially along midribs; and very long petioles of up to 9 cm.

Type

United States of America. Hawaiian Islands, Kaua‘i: Waimea District, Mākaha Valley, Metrosideros-Acacia montane mesic forest, 22°7'1.8258"N; 159°40'45.534"W, 997 m elev., 24 Jan 2016, K. R. Wood & Kahekili Lee 16727 (holotype: PTBG-073080!; isotypes: BISH!, K!, MO!, NY!, UC!, US!).

Figure 1. 

Melicope stonei K.R. Wood, Appelhans & W.L. Wagner. A Flowering branch B Adaxial leaf surface near margin toward apex C Abaxial leaf surface near margin toward apex D Ramiflorous inflorescence arising below leaves on stem E Female flower, lateral view F Immature fruit and flowers G Dehisced fruit, showing seeds. A-C from Wagner & Wood 6891 (US) D from Wood 8431 (US) E from Wood 15101 (PTBG) F from Wood & Lee 16729 (photo) G from Lorence et al. 6454 (photo) (Illustration by Alice Tangerini).

Description

Trees (3–)5–12 m tall, trunks up to 25 cm diameter, bark smooth, mottled gray to light brown, new growth and young branchlets tomentose, yellow-tan, glabrate in age. Leaves opposite, unifoliolate, coriaceous, the blade ovate, oblong-ovate, oblong-elliptic, or oblong-lanceolate, (5–)8–30 × (4–)6–11 cm, margin entire, base rounded, apex obtuse to acute, occasionally rounded, secondary veins 7–15 pairs, connected by an arched vein 5–20 mm from margin, higher order venation reticulate, adaxial surface glabrous, abaxial surface densely tomentose, yellow-tan, rarely glabrate, with midrib and secondary veins densely tomentose, interspersed villous, the midrib sometimes also long-villous or woolly along the sides; petiole shallowly canaliculate, (2.5–)3.5–9.0 cm long, puberulent to tomentose. Inflorescences in axillary and ramiflorous, fasciculate cymes to 22 mm long, peduncles 1–5(–10) mm long, short-villous, pedicles 1–4 mm, short-villous, bracteoles deltoid-ovate, 1–2 mm long, densely short-villous. Flowers male or female, plants monoecious, 3–5(–7), sepals deltoid-ovate, naviculate, 2.5–3.0 × 1.5–2.0 mm, densely short-villous externally, glabrous internally, tip acute, persistent in fruit; petals whitish green, ovate, tip acute, slightly thickened and hooked inward, 3.5 × 2.5 mm, densely short-villous externally, glabrous internally; stamens 8, filaments glabrous, papillose on distal half, antisepalous ones ca. 4 mm long in male flowers (1.5 mm in female flowers), antipetalous ones 3 mm long (1.5 mm in female flowers), anthers ca. 1 mm long, all with pollen in male flowers, (0.6–0.7 mm long in female, apparently sterile); nectary disk glabrous; ovary glabrous; gynoecium 1 × 2 mm, style including stigma 1 mm long in male flowers (1.5 mm in female), glabrous, stigmas capitate, 4-lobed, papillose, 0.5 mm wide. Capsules medium to dark green when fresh, irregularly pusticulate, 5–9 × 15–21 mm, of 4 distinct follicles, slightly ascending, occasionally 1 or more abortive, exocarp glabrous, glandular punctate, endocarp glabrous. Seeds 1–2 per carpel, ovoid, 6–8 mm long.

Phenology

Melicope stonei has been observed with flower buds in January, May, and September, and with both flower and fruit during January, February, and July.

Etymology

We are pleased to name Melicope stonei in honor of Benjamin Clemens Masterman Stone, British-American botanist, born in Shanghai, China in1933 and passed in 1994 while working at the Philippine National Museum on the Flora of the Philippines Project. He contributed over 300 publications to science during his career, including taxonomic monographs of Hawaiian Pelea (Stone 1969) and Platydesma (Stone 1962). For all his contributions, especially his keen insights into Hawaiian Melicope, we gratefully extend him due recognition.

Specimens examined

United States. Hawaiian Islands, Kaua‘i: Waimea District, Ku‘ia, upper headwater gulch, 1027 m elev., 03 Sep 2015, K. R. Wood, S. Perlman, S. Walsh, M. Query 16579 (PTBG); Miloli‘i ridge road, Mahanaloa, 933 m elev., 06 Nov 2008, C. Trauernicht & N. Tangalin 617 (PTBG); Mahanaloa, 1055 m elev., 21 Oct 2015, S. Walsh & A. Williams 136 (PTBG); Pa‘aiki-Mahanaloa flats, 1036 m elev., 07 Oct 2001, K. R. Wood 9128 (BISH, PTBG); Pa‘aiki-Mahanaloa flats, 991 m elev., 04 Mar 2001, K. R. Wood & M. LeGrande 8879 (PTBG); Pa‘aiki-Mahanaloa flats, 1000 m elev., 14 Dec 1994, K. R. Wood 3840 (PTBG, US); Pa‘aiki-Mahanaloa flats, 1000 m elev., 24 Feb 1999, K. R. Wood 7696 (PTBG); Pa‘aiki-Mahanaloa flats, 1000 m elev., 24 Feb 1999, K. R. Wood & R. Aguraiuja 7697 (BISH, CANB, MO, NY, PTBG, US); Pa‘aiki-Mahanaloa flats, 1015 m elev., 06 May 2000, K. R. Wood 8432 (BISH, NY, PTBG, US); Pa‘aiki-Mahanaloa flats, 1015 m elev., 06 May 2000, K. R. Wood 8433 (PTBG, US); Mākaha Ridge Road, down .8 mi to 988 m elev., north side of road, just inside forest, 970 m elev., 7 Feb 1988, D. Lorence, G. Lorence & E. Crum 5779 (PTBG); loc. cit., 970 m elev., 2 Jan 1989; D. Lorence, T. Flynn & Smith 6316 (PTBG); loc. cit., 970 m elev., 1 Mar 1989, T. Flynn & Decker 3280 (AD, BISH, F, MO, MU, PTBG, US); loc. cit., 970 m elev., 31 May 1990, D. Lorence et al. 6449 (PTBG); loc. cit., 920 m elev., 25 Feb 2000, W. Wagner & K. R. Wood 6891 (PTBG); south side of Mākaha road, 988 m elev., 06 May 2000, K. R. Wood 8430 (PTBG); loc. cit., 988 m elev., 06 May 2000, K. R. Wood 8431 (PTBG, US); loc. cit., 991 m elev., 21 Jul 2012, K. R. Wood & T. Bierly 15104.02 (PTBG); loc. cit., 997 m elev., 24 Jan 2016, K. R. Wood & K. Lee 16726 (BISH, PTBG); loc. cit., 997 m elev., 24 Jan 2016, K. R. Wood, K. Lee 16727 (PTBG); loc. cit., 997 m elev., Jan 2016, K. R. Wood, S. Perlman & R. Aguraiuja 16729 (BISH, PTBG, US); loc. cit., 997 m elev., K. R. Wood & K. Lee 16728 (BISH, K, MO, NY, PTBG, UC, US); loc. cit., 997 m elev., 28 Jan 2016, K. R. Wood, S. Perlman & R. Aguraiuja 16730 (PTBG, US); loc. cit., 997 m elev., 28 Jan 2016, K. R. Wood, S. Perlman & R. Aguraiuja 16731 (BISH, PTBG, US); loc. cit., 997 m elev., 28 Jan 2016, K. R. Wood, S. Perlman & R. Aguraiuja 16732 (BISH, PTBG, UC, US); Mākaha, forests around dividing ridge between upper north and south fork, 1037 m elev., 18 Feb 2016, K. R. Wood & S. Perlman 16741 (PTBG); Nu‘ololo, north facing slopes above northern branch, 1097 m elev., 18 Jul 2012, K. R. Wood, M. Query & M. Kirkpatrick 15101 (BISH, K, MBK, MO, NY, P, PTBG, UC, US); Nu‘ololo, north of trail, headwaters of central Nu‘ololo stream, 1061 m, 3 Oct 2012, K. R. Wood, M. Kirkpatrick & M. Query 15267 (BISH, PTBG, US); Nu‘ololo, 1052 m elev., 02 Jan 2013, K. R. Wood & M. Kirkpatrick 15319 (BISH, PTBG); Nu‘ololo, 1049 m elev., 02 Jan 2013, K. R. Wood & M. Kirkpatrick 15320 (BISH, NY, PTBG, UC, US); Nu‘ololo, 1085 m elev., K. R. Wood, M. Kirkpatrick & S. Perlman 15560 (PTBG); Nu‘ololo, 1027 m elev., Jul 2013, K. R. Wood, M. Kirkpatrick & S. Perlman 15562 (PTBG); Nu‘ololo, 1052 m elev., 12 Sep 2013, K. R. Wood & W. Kishida 15667 (PTBG); Nu‘ololo, 1036 m elev., 12 Sep 2013, K. R. Wood & W. Kishida 15668 (PTBG); Nu‘ololo, 1061 m elev., 28 Sep 2013, K. R. Wood & M. Query 15671 (PTBG); Nu‘ololo, 1073 m elev., 22 Jul 2014, K. R. Wood, M. Kirkpatrick, S. Perlman & R. Aguraiuja 16001 (PTBG); loc. cit., 1073 m elev., 22 Jul 2014, K. R. Wood, M. Kirkpatrick, S. Perlman & R. Aguraiuja 16002 (PTBG).

Distribution, ecology, and threats. Melicope stonei is endemic to Kaua‘i, oldest of the high Hawaiian Islands at 5.1 million years, with an area of ca. 1430 km2 (Sakai et al. 2002), and maximum elevation of 1598 m at the summit of Kawaikini. Floristically, Kaua‘i has the phenomenal distinction of having the highest level of plant diversity of all the Hawaiian Islands, which includes 249 single island endemic (SIE) taxa, 232 of which are flowering plants, and the remaining 17 being unique fern taxa (Palmer 2003, Wagner et al. 2012, Vernon and Ranker 2013, Ranker 2016, Wood et al. 2016b).

Earliest known collections of Melicope stonei were made by David Lorence and Timothy Flynn (National Tropical Botanical Garden) as far back as February of 1988 within the forests of Mākaha Valley, Kaua‘i. Over the past 29 years, 94 trees have been mapped by local botanists, with colonies extending into several valleys to the north of Mākaha, namely Ku‘ia, Miloli‘i, Mahanaloa, Nu‘ololo, and Pa‘aiki (Figure 3). Melicope stonei has a very narrow elevational range of 988 to 1097 m and a precariously small extent of occurrence of 1.5 km2. Rich forest habitats still flourish in adjacent lower and higher elevational regions, yet it is evident that M. stonei prefers very tall (15–20 m) old growth Metrosideros polymorpha Gaudich. (Myrtaceae)- Acacia koa A. Gray (Fabaceae) mixed mesic forest with the occasional co-dominant Alphitonia ponderosa Hillebr. (Rhamnaceae). This plant community type only occurs on Kaua‘i and is exceedingly limited with some of the finest examples occurring around the forested flats of Kōke‘e State Park above Pa‘aiki, Mahanaloa, and Nu‘ololo. In these forests, M. stonei reaches heights of 10–12 m and is associated with a wide diversity of other tall understory trees such as Bobea brevipes A. Gray (Rubiaceae), Cryptocarya mannii Hillebr. (Lauraceae), Dodonaea viscosa Jacq. (Sapindaceae), Kadua affinis DC. (Rubiaceae), Melicope barbigera A. Gray, Myrsine lanaiensis Hillebr. (Primulaceae), Nestegis sandwicensis (A. Gray) O. Deg., I. Deg. & L.A.S. Johnson (Oleaceae), Planchonella sandwicensis (A. Gray) Pierre (Sapotaceae), Polyscias kavaiensis (H. Mann) Lowry & G.M. Plunkett and P. waimeae (Wawra) Lowry & G.M. Plunkett (Araliaceae), Psychotria mariniana (Cham. & Schltdl.) Fosberg (Rubiaceae), Santalum pyrularium Hook. & Arn. (Santalaceae), Syzygium sandwicensis (A. Gray) Nied. (Myrtaceae), Xylosma hawaiiense Seem. (Salicaceae), and Zanthoxylum dipetalum H. Mann (Rutaceae).

Interspersed below this community’s canopy are rich assemblages of medium statured trees that include Antidesma platyphylla H. Mann var. hillebrandii Pax & Hoffm. (Phyllanthaceae), Chrysodracon aurea (H. Mann) P.-L. Lu & Morden (Asparagaceae), Claoxylon sandwicense Müll. Arg. (Euphorbiaceae), Coprosma foliosa A. Gray and C. waimeae Wawra (Rubiaceae), Cyanea leptostegia A. Gray (Campanulaceae), Elaeocarpus bifidus Hook. & Arn. (Elaeocarpaceae), Labordia helleri Sherff (Loganiaceae), Myrsine alyxifolia Hosaka, Pittosporum kauaiense Hillebr. (Pittosporaceae), Platydesma rostrata Hillebr. and P. spathulata (Rutaceae), Psychotria greenwelliae Fosberg, Psydrax odorata (G. Forst.) A.C. Sm. & S.P. Darwin (both Rubiaceae), Sophora chrysophylla (Salisb.) Seem. (Fabaceae), Streblus pendulinus (Endl.) F. Muell. (Moraceae), and Wikstroemia furcata (Hillebr.) Rock (Thymelaeaceae).

Common shrubs and smaller tree components are Leptecophylla tameiameiae (Cham. & Schlecht.) C.M. Weiller (Epacridaceae), Lysimachia kalalauensis Skottsb. (Primulaceae), Melicope anisata (H. Mann) T.G. Hartley & B.C. Stone, M. feddei (H. Lév.) T.G. Hartley & B.C. Stone, M. ovata (H. St. John & E.P. Hume) T.G. Hartley & B.C. Stone, and M. peduncularis (H. Lév.) T.G. Hartley & B.C. Stone.

Associated sedges (Cyperaceae) include Carex meyenii Nees, C. wahuensis C.A. Mey., and Gahnia beecheyi H. Mann, grasses (Poaceae) are Eragrostis grandis Hillebr., E. variabilis (Gaudich.) Steud., and Panicum nephelophilum Gaudich., and additional associated vegetation includes the herbaceous Dianella sandwicensis Hook. & Arn. (Xanthorrhoeaceae), and vines of Alyxia stellata (J.R. & G. Forst.) Roem. & Schult. (Apocynaceae), and Smilax melastomifolia Sm. (Smilacaceae).

Common to occasional pteridophytes of this habitat are Asplenium normale D. Don (Aspleniaceae) Adenophorus tamariscinus (Kaulf.) Hook. & Grev. and A. tripinnatifidus Gaudich. (Polypodiaceae), Cibotium nealiae O. Deg. (Cibotiaceae), Coniogramme pilosa (Brack.) Hieron. (Pteridaceae), Diplazium sandwicensis (A. DC.) Fosberg (Athyriaceae), Doodia kunthiana Gaudich. (Blechnaceae), Dryopteris glabra (Brack.) Kuntze, and D. unidentata (Hook. & Arn.) C. Chr. (Dryopteridaceae), Elaphoglossum paleaceum (Hook. & Grev.) Sledge (Dryopteridaceae), Microlepia strigosa (Thunb.) C. Presl (Dennstaedtiaceae), and Odontosoria chinensis (L.) J. Sm. (Lindsaeaceae).

Threats to Melicope stonei include habitat degradation by introduced pigs (Sus scrofa L.) and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus Rafinesque), predation of seeds by rats (Rattus rattus L. and R. exulans Peale), environmental events such as hurricanes, fire (mostly by humans), and competition with invasive non-native plant species, including Adiantum hispidulum Sw. (Pteridaceae), Blechnum appendiculatum Willd. (Blechnaceae), Corynocarpus laevigatus J.R. Forst. & G. Forst. (Corynocarpaceae), Erigeron karvinskianus DC. (Asteraceae), Grevillea robusta A. Cunn. ex R. Br. (Proteaceae), Hedychium gardnerianum Ker Gawl. (Zingiberaceae), Kalanchoe pinnata (Lam.) Pres. (Crassulaceae), Lantana camara L. (Verbenaceae), Lophospermum confertus (R. Br.) P.G. Wilson & J.T. Waterhouse (Myrtaceae), Morella faya (Ait.) Wilbur (Myricaceae), Psidium cattleianum Sabine (Myrtaceae), Rubus argutus Link and R. rosifolius Sm. (Rosaceae), Setaria parviflora (Poir.) Kerguélen (Poaceae), and Sphaeropteris cooperi (Hook. ex F. Muell.) R.M. Tryon (Cyatheaceae) all of which possess the ability to spread rapidly and cover effectively large areas (Smith 1985).

Conservation status.IUCN Red List Category. When evaluated using the World Conservation Union (IUCN) criteria for endangerment (IUCN 2001), Melicope stonei falls into the Critically Endangered (CR) category, which designates this species as facing a very high risk of extinction in the wild. Our formal evaluation can be summarized by the following IUCN hierarchical alphanumeric ranking system of criteria and subcriteria: CR B1ab(i,ii,iii,iv,v)+2ab(i,ii,iii,iv,v); C2a(i); which reflects a severely limited Extent of Occurrence (EOO) and Area of Occupancy (AOO) of less than 1.5 km2 and a wild population of less than 100 individuals with all facing a continuing decline in their area of extent and quality of habitat (see Distribution, ecology, and threats). Seeds from several individuals of M. stonei have been collected and submitted to the NTBG Horticultural Department for cultivation.

Morphology, related taxa, and phylogenetic placement. Melicope stonei stands apart from all other described Hawaiian Melicope species by its combination of being large monoecious trees up to 12 m tall with distinct carpels and short-villous ramiflorous inflorescences. There are three other Hawaiian species that usually have ramiflorous cymes arising on stems below the leaves, namely M. clusiifolia (A. Gray) T.G. Hartley & B.C. Stone from Kaua‘i, O‘ahu, Moloka‘i, Lana‘i, Maui, and Hawai‘i, M. haleakalae (B.C. Stone) T.G. Hartley & B.C. Stone from Maui, and M. waialealae (Wawra) T.G. Hartley & B.C. Stone from Kaua‘i, yet they differ from M. stonei in having leaves in whorls of 4–8 with abaxial surface glabrous or with some hairs on midrib or sometimes loosely villous throughout the surface, and having carpels connate at their base or nearly throughout their length in fruit (as compared to M. stonei having leaves opposite with abaxial surface densely tomentose and with carpels distinct in fruit). Other Hawaiian species that may occasionally have the cymes arising below the leaves include M. ovata from Kaua‘i, M. pseudoanisata (Rock) T.G. Hartley & B.C. Stone, from Maui and Hawai‘i, and M. quadrangularis (H. St. John & E.P. Hume) T.G. Hartley & B.C. Stone, also from Kaua‘i. The latter two differ with carpels connate and leaves glabrous or with some hairs on midrib (Wagner et al. 1999), and the former, M. ovata, lacks the short-villous peduncles, pedicels, sepals, and petals found on M. stonei. Morphologically, these species have little else in common with M. stonei.

In habit Melicope stonei appears most similar to trees of M. barbigera from Kaua‘i and M. knudsenii (Hillebr.) T.G. Hartley & B.C. Stone from Kaua‘i and Maui, both of which can reach heights of 12 m. Melicope barbigera differs from M. stonei in having new growth grayish appressed puberulent; slightly folded leaves with waxy scurf and commonly having abaxial leaf surface densely long-villous along each side of midrib (Fig. 2G); cymes axillary, not ramiflorous; peduncles 20–25 mm long; nectary disk and ovary puberulent (as compared to M. stonei with new growth tomentose, yellow-tan; leaves neither folded nor having a waxy scurf, rarely with abaxial surface densely long-villous along each side of midrib (Fig. 2E–F); cymes axillary and ramiflorous; peduncles 1–5(–10) mm long; with nectary disk and ovary glabrous). Melicope knudsenii differs in having leaf bases weakly cordate; flowers perfect or unisexual, (3–)20–200; cymes axillary, not ramiflorous; and peduncles (10–)30–60 mm long; (as compared to M. stonei with leaf bases rounded; flowers male or female, plants monoecious, 3–5(–7); cymes axillary and ramiflorous; and peduncles 1–5(–10) mm long) (Wagner et al. 1999).

Figure 2. 

Melicope stonei K.R. Wood, Appelhans & W.L. Wagner. A Male flower, lateral view with sepals and petals cut away to show antisepalous and antipetalous stamens B Male flower, top view C Female flower, lateral view with sepals and petals cut away to show staminodes and pistil D Female flower, top view E–F abaxial leaf surface along midvein of M. stonei showing variability of leaf vestiture G Melicope barbigera A. Gray abaxial leaf surface along midvein A–D from Wood 15101 (PTBG) E from Wagner & Wood 6891 (US) F from Wood 8432 (US) G from Wagner & Wood 6896 (US) (Illustration by Alice Tangerini).

Four specimens of Melicope stonei (Wagner & Wood 6891; Wood 7696; Wood & Aguraiuja 7697; Wood, Query & Kirkpatrick 15101) have been included in phylogenetic analyses of Hawaiian Melicope (Harbaugh et al. 2009; Appelhans et al. 2014b,c) and they all represent paratypes of this new species. The specimens were labeled as M. knudsenii in these studies according to their original conferred determination. Phylogenetic analyses showed that the former section Apocarpa is paraphyletic with respect to the former section Pelea (unpublished results) and that M. stonei forms a clade with the “Apocarpa” species M. adscendens and M. ovata (Fig. 4). The monophyly of this clade is supported by posterior probability (1.00pp) and bootstrap (98bs) values and the three species, of which three to four specimens have been sampled, were resolved as monophyletic entities (Appelhans et al. 2014c; Fig. 4).

Melicope adscendens (H. St. John & E.P. Hume) T.G. Hartley & B.C. Stone, from Maui, and the previously mentioned M. ovata from Kaua‘i, which are the closest relatives of M. stonei, (Appelhans et al. 2014c; Fig. 4) do not have clear morphological similarities with the new species. While M. stonei is a tall tree, M. adscendens is a sprawling shrub and M. ovata is a shrub or small tree with sprawling branches. Melicope adscendens has considerably smaller leaves 1.5–6.5 × 1–4 cm and does not have a densely tomentose abaxial leaf surface, being minutely puberulent, becoming glabrate (as compared to M. stonei with leaves (5–)8–30 × (4–)6–11 cm with densely tomentose abaxial leaf surface). Melicope ovata has sepals glabrous or sparsely minutely ciliate externally, and petals glabrous externally (Wagner et al. 1999), (as compared to M. stonei with sepals and petals densely short-villous externally).

Figure 3. 

Map of Kaua‘i, Hawaiian Islands, with polygon indicating distribution of Melicope stonei in the Kōke‘e forests.

A striking character of Melicope stonei is the ramiflorous inflorescences, which it most notably shares with M. clusiifolia, M. haleakalae, M. ovata, M. pseudoanisata, M. quadrangularis, and M. waialealae, and can occur on rare occasions with other Hawaiian Melicope. This character is homoplasious and has evolved probably three or four times in Hawaiian Melicope: once in M. stonei and M. ovata of the Apocarpa group, once in the ancestor of M. clusiifolia, M. haleakalae and M. waialealae, who form the monophyletic Pelea group (Appelhans et al. 2014c; Fig. 4), and once or twice in the ancestor(s) of M. pseudoanisata and M. quadrangularis, which are part of an unresolved group of species belonging to the intermixed former sections Cubicarpa and Megacarpa (unpublished results; Fig. 4).

Figure 4. 

Phylogenetic placement of Melicope stonei K.R. Wood, Appelhans & W.L. Wagner based on four nuclear and two plastid markers (modified from Appelhans et al. 2014c). The phylogenetic tree only shows the Hawaiian radiation of Melicope. The terms Apocarpa, Cubicarpa, Megacarpa and Pelea refer to the former Hawaiian sections of Melicope/Pelea (Hartley & Stone 1989). The support values are displayed above the branches and the first value represents the Bayesian posterior probability values (pp), followed by the bootstrap values (bs) from the Maximum Likelihood analysis.

Morphologically, Melicope stonei is most similar to M. barbigera and the Kaua‘i population of M. knudsenii (see above). Melicope knudsenii has been shown to be polyphyletic and the Maui form does not belong to this group (Appelhans et al. 2014c; Fig. 4). As a result, a future publication is now in preparation which will resurrect the Maui form (i.e., M. multiflora Rock) as a species distinct from the Kaua`i M. knudsenii. While M. barbigera and the Kaua‘i form of M. knudsenii are resolved as immediate sisters in the phylogenetic analyses, M. stonei is not closely related to them and belongs to another clade of the paraphyletic Apocarpa group (Appelhans et al. 2014c; Fig. 4). It should be noted that the variable abaxial midrib pubescence of M. stonei ranging from villous on the sides to uniform pubescence (Fig. 2E–F) could represent natural variability or may suggest possible undetected hybridization between M. stonei and M. barbigera. Other putative Apocarpa hybrids collected and observed in the Kōke‘e forests of Kaua‘i include: M. barbigera × M. haupuensis (H. St. John) T.G. Harley & B.C. Stone (i.e., Wood & Query 14696 [PTBG]) observed around Awa‘awapuhi and Honopū (825–1050 m); M. haupuensis × M. pallida (Hillebr.) T.G. Hartley & B.C. Stone (i.e., Wood et al. 7725 [PTBG]) around Awa‘awapuhi (1050 m); and M. ovata × M. stonei (i.e., Wood 17237 [BISH, K, MO, NY, PTBG, UC, US], Wood 17245 [BISH, PTBG, UC, US], Wood 17246 [BISH, PTBG, US]), in the valleys of Mākaha to Nu‘ololo (988–1097 m).

Insert for existing key to Hawaiian Melicope

To accommodate Melicope stonei, the following couplets can be inserted into the existing key to Hawaiian Melicope (treated as Pelea) by Stone, Wagner, and Herbst (in Wagner et al. 1999, p. 1178) (Note: K=Kaua‘i; O=O‘ahu; WM=West Maui).

1 Carpels distinct in fruit; leaves opposite or rarely ternate 2
1' Carpels connate at least at base in fruit; the capsules 4-lobed; leaves opposite or whorled 15
2(1) Endocarp pubescent, at least along suture 3
2' Endocarp glabrous 6
6(2) Leaves ternate; new growth black-resinous and minutely puberulent; exocarp glabrous and somewhat glaucous, especially when immature; K, O M. pallida
6' Leaves opposite; new growth not black-resinous, but puberulent or tomentose; exocarp glabrous or puberulent, but never glaucous 7
7(6) Abaxial leaf surface densely long-villous or tomentose in a line along each side of midrib and sometimes on the midrib itself, the surface away from midrib densely to loosely pubescent or tomentose, some hairs tending to fall off with age 7a
7' Abaxial leaf surface glabrous to densely tomentose or puberulent, sometimes more densely so toward midrib, but not long-villous in a line along each side of midrib 8
7a(7) Midrib glabrous or nearly so other than long-villous hairs along sides; K M. barbigera
7a' Midrib pubescent and also long-villous or tomentose along sides; K M. stonei
8(7) Exocarp minutely puberulent throughout with short, erect, white hairs, becoming yellowish in dry specimens; O, WM M. elliptica
8' Exocarp glabrous or minutely appressed puberulent near suture 9
9(8) Abaxial leaf surface densely tomentose or densely puberulent with strongly appressed, extremely fine hairs 10
9' Abaxial leaf surface glabrous or densely puberulent when young, becoming sparsely so or glabrate with age 11
10(9) Shrubs or trees to 3 m tall; leaves 1.5–5 cm wide; abaxial leaf surface densely puberulent with strongly appressed extremely fine hairs mixed with white waxy scurf; petioles 10–22 mm long; pedicels 5–10 mm long; O M. makahae
10' Large trees to 12 m tall; leaves (4–)6–11 cm wide; abaxial leaf surface densely tomentose without white waxy scurf; petioles 20–90 mm long; pedicels 1–5 mm long 10a
10a(10) Leaf base weakly cordate; flowers (3–)20–200; cymes axillary, not ramiflorous; peduncles (10–)30–60 mm long; K, EM M. knudsenii
10a' Leaf base rounded; flowers 3–5(–7); cymes axillary and ramiflorous; peduncles 1–5(–10) mm long; K M. stonei

Acknowledgements

For assistance in forest research and herbarium collections we are grateful to Ruth Aguraiuja, Teruko Bierly, Michelle Clark, Timothy Flynn, Megan Kirkpatrick, Wendy Kishida, Kahekili Lee, Maya LeGrande, David Lorence, Steve Perlman, Mark Query, Natalia Tangalin, Clay Trauernicht, Seana Walsh, and Adam Williams. For conservation research and support we acknowledge the National Tropical Botanical Garden; the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; the Hawaii State Department of Land and Natural Resources; the Plant Extinction Prevention Program of Hawaii; Department of Botany, Smithsonian Institution; and the Department of Systematic Botany, University of Göttingen, Germany. Much appreciation is extended to Timothy Flynn and David Lorence at the PTBG herbarium for their contributions which include the original discovery of Melicope stonei and discussions on Melicope systematics. Gratitude to Alice Tangerini for the fine illustrations and to an anonymous reviewer for improving the manuscript.

References

  • Appelhans MS, Wagner WL, Wood KR (2014a) Melicope balgooyi Appelhans, W.L. Wagner & K.R. Wood, a new species and new record in Melicope section Melicope (Rutaceae) for the Austral Islands. PhytoKeys 39: 77–86. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.39.7691
  • Appelhans MS, Wen J, Wagner WL (2014b) A molecular phylogeny of Acronychia, Euodia, Melicope and relatives (Rutaceae) reveals polyphyletic genera and key innovations for species richness. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 79: 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.06.014
  • Appelhans MS, Wen J, Wood KR, Allan GJ, Zimmer EA, Wagner WL (2014c) Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Hawaiian Rutaceae (Melicope, Platydesma and Zanthoxylum) and their different colonization patterns. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 174: 425–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12123
  • Harbaugh DT, Wagner WL, Allan GJ, Zimmer EA (2009) The Hawaiian Archipelago is a stepping stone for dispersal in the Pacific: an example from the plant genus Melicope (Rutaceae). Journal of Biogeography 36: 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.02008.x
  • Hartley TG (2001) On the Taxonomy and Biogeography of Euodia and Melicope (Rutaceae). Allertonia 8(1), National Tropical Botanical Garden, Lawa‘i, Kaua‘i, Hawaii.
  • Hillebrand W (1888) Flora of the Hawaiian Islands: a description of their phanerogams and vascular cryptogams. B. Westermann & Co., New York, 673 pp.
  • Palmer DD (2003) Hawai‘i’s ferns and fern allies. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.
  • Smith CW (1985) Impact of alien plants on Hawai‘i’s native biota. In: Stone CP, Scott JM (Eds) Hawai‘i’s Terrestrial Ecosystems: Preservation and Management.Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit, University of Hawaii, Manoa, 180–250.
  • Stone BC (1962) A monograph of the genus Platydesma (Rutaceae). Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 43: 410–427.
  • Stone BC (1969) The Genus Pelea A. Gray (Rutaceae: Evodineae) A Taxonomic Monograph (Studies in the Hawaiian Rutaceae, 10) Phanerogamarum Monographiae Tomus III Verlag Von J. Cramer.
  • Wagner WL, Herbst DR, Sohmer SH (1999) Manual of the flowering plants of Hawai‘i, revised edition with supplement by Wagner WL & Herbst DR. University of Hawaii Press, 1855–1918. [Bishop Museum Special Publication 97]
  • Wood KR, Appelhans MS, Wagner WL (2016a) Melicope oppenheimeri, section Pelea (Rutaceae), a new species form West Maui, Hawaiian Islands: with notes on its ecology, conservation, and phylogenetic placement, PhytoKeys 69: 51–64. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.69.8844
  • Wood KR, Lorence DH, Kiehn M (2016b) Coprosma kawaikiniensis (Rubiaceae) a new species from the Dubautia-Sadleria shrubland-fernland community on Kaua‘i, Hawaiian Islands. PhytoKeys 60: 21–32. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.60.6406
login to comment