Research Article
Print
Research Article
Study of the leaf anatomy in cross-section in the Iberian species of Festuca L. (Poaceae) and its systematic significance
expand article infoGloria Martínez-Sagarra, Pilar Abad, Juan Antonio Devesa
‡ Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
Open Access

Abstract

A study of the leaf anatomy in the species of the genus Festuca present in the Iberian Peninsula was made. A total of 68 taxa were included and 15 characters were measured in leaf cross-section. The major anatomical features of each taxonomic group were characterized, and some variability was observed in the taxa. The anatomical patterns observed were compared and discussed with the relationships suggested by the molecular analyses. The leaf outline, the presence or absence of complete girders, and the development degree of the bulliform cells were the main characters to differentiate among fescue species of the fine-leaved clade and those of the broad-leaved clade. The most useful character to segregate species groups within the different taxonomic sections was the arrangement of the sclerenchyma, and a remarkable variability of this character was found in the species of Festuca section Festuca, especially in those located in other lineages according to molecular markers. Most of the anatomical patterns were not exclusive of the sections or lineages, and only some taxa could be anatomically differentiated at species level based on a set of non-taxative characters. The discordant pattern observed in F. henriquesii, a species traditionally included in Festuca sect. Festuca that shared anatomical features with the species of “F. rubra complex”, suggests its possible inclusion in the sect. Aulaxyper pending further taxonomic and phylogenetic analyses.

Keywords

Festuca, Iberian Peninsula, leaf anatomy, sclerenchyma arrangement

Introduction

Festuca L. is one of the largest genera within the family Poaceae with more than 450 species mostly distributed in the temperate and alpine zones of both hemispheres (Watson and Dallwitz 1992; Clayton et al. 2006 onwards). Some fescue species are economically important worldwide for their forage value (e.g., Festuca arundinacea Schreb.), as well as for their use in turfs (e.g., F. rubra L.), gardening (e.g., F. glauca Vill.), and soil fixation (e.g., F. ovina L.).

The Iberian Peninsula has been considered one of the main speciation centres of the genus Festuca (Saint-Yves 1930), with about 100 taxa (between 70 and 80 species) organized in ten sections and three subgenera (Cebolla and Rivas Ponce 2003a; Devesa et al. 2013). It comprises rhizomatous and cespitose perennial species, both diploid and polyploid (up to 12x = 84 chromosomes; Fuente et al. 2001; Loureiro et al. 2007), capable of growing in a wide variety of environments and habitats (Kerguélen and Plonka 1989). Many of them are endemic species adapted to high mountain conditions (e.g., F. indigesta Boiss. and F. pseudeskia Boiss.), but they also grow in wet pastures (many species of the “F. rubra complex”), river areas, and forest edges [e.g., F. gigantea (L.) Vill.], and on coastal rocky cliffs and fixed coastal dunes, being able to tolerate high environmental salt levels [e.g., F. vasconcensis (Markgr.-Dann.) Auquier & Kerguélen and F. juncifolia Chaub.].

The phylogenetic analyses based on nuclear and chloroplast markers suggest that Festuca is a paraphyletic genus which should include other genera that were previously treated independently, such as Lolium L. and Vulpia C.C. Gmel. among others (e.g., Charmet et al. 1997; Torrecilla and Catalán 2002; Catalán et al. 2004; Inda et al. 2008). The fescue species are subdivided into two well supported clades: the “broad-leaved” and the “fine-leaved”, named so for the leaf shape of the species included in them. In general terms, the broad-leaved fescues have flat leaves, convolute or inrolled vernation, and the fine-leaved fescues have conduplicate or infolded leaves, and acicular, setaceous, or filiform innovation leaf blades (Catalán et al. 2007), although there are several exceptions (Namaganda and Lye 2008).

In the Iberian territory, the broad-leaved clade comprises the sects. Schedonorus (P. Beauv.) W.D.J. Koch (4 species), and Plantynia (Dumort.) Tzvelev (1 species) from subgenus Schedonorus (P. Beauv.) Peterm., the sect. Phaeochloa Griseb. (2 species) from subgenus Drymanthele Krecz. & Bobrov, and the sects. Subbulbosae Nyman ex Hack. (3 species), Scariosae Hack. (1 species), Pseudoscariosa Krivot. (1 species), and Lojaconoa Catalán & Joch. Müll. (2 species) from subgenus Festuca. The fine-leaved clade includes the sects. Eskia Willk. (5 species), and the more recently diverged sects. Festuca (subsections Festuca and Exaratae St.-Yves; ca. 45 species) and Aulaxyper Dumort. (ca. 15 species), all of them belonging to the subgenus Festuca. According to the molecular data, some species conventionally classified within sects. Festuca and Aulaxyper fall outside the clades that include their respective type species (Catalán et al. 2007), but the interspecific relations within those clades are not resolved or are poorly supported (Torrecilla et al. 2004).

The taxonomy of this genus is very complex due to the great morphological similarity between species and the high degree of overlap in the ranges of variation. The shortage of diagnostic morphological characters has favoured the study of complementary characters in order to clarify the taxonomic relationships between species and allow their correct identification. Anatomical features of the leaf blades in cross-section and those related to the micro-morphology of epidermal surfaces have been the main supplementary tools to add to the morphological characters used to characterize Festuca (e.g., Metcalfe 1960; Ellis 1976, 1979, 1986; Namaganda et al. 2009) and other genera of difficult taxonomy within the Poaceae family (e.g., López and Devesa 1991; Pimentel and Sahuquillo 2003; Kuzmanović et al. 2009; Gennaro and Morrone 2010; Ortúñez and Fuente 2010; Ortúñez and Cano-Ruiz 2013). Since Hackel (1882), leaf anatomy has been considered of taxonomic interest in the genus, and characters such as the outline of the leaf cross-section, the arrangement of sclerenchyma in relation to the vascular bundles, and the number of ribs and furrows are used around the world in combination with other morphological characters (e.g., Saint-Yves 1909; Metcalfe 1960; Ellis 1976; Markgraf-Dannenberg 1980; Kerguélen and Plonka 1989; Portal 1996; Clayton and Renvoize 1986; Fuente and Ortúñez 1998). The leaf anatomy has been especially investigated within the fine-leaved fescues clade, with a more complex taxonomy than the broad-leaved clade, and many taxa have been described or segregated mainly based on those anatomical characters (Namaganda et al. 2009).

Despite the extensive use of the leaf anatomy in Festuca and the importance of its systematics, many studies have evaluated environmental influences on the anatomical characters. Several authors have pointed out its restricted taxonomic value in Festuca (Connor 1960; Kjellqvist 1961; Aiken et al. 1985; Aiken and Consaul 1995; Ramesar-Fortner et al. 1995) and other grasses (Ruiz-Téllez et al. 1998; Giełwanowska et al. 2005; Kuzmanović et al. 2012; Olsen et al. 2013) because some features may be affected by ecological factors and by phenotype plasticity. However, although the identification of Festuca species using only anatomical variables is complex, most authors agree that it would reduce the possibilities of error and improve the separation of several similar taxa which were indistinguishable based on the morphology of vegetative and reproductive organs (Aiken et al. 1985).

In the Iberian Peninsula, leaf anatomy studies have usually been partial, accompanying species descriptions or in the treatments of regional Floras, and generally corresponding to iconographic details and diagrams or drawings of leaf cross-sections (e.g., Aizpuru et al. 1997; Fuente et al. 1997; Bolòs and Vigo 2001; Catalán 2009). On the occasion of the taxonomic study of the genus Festuca in the framework of the Flora iberica Project (Castroviejo et al. 1986–2017), the cross-section leaf anatomy of most species currently recognized for this territory have been analysed. In this work, we aim at improving our anatomical knowledge about the genus, and compare the leaf anatomy patterns with the latest molecular phylogenies.

Material and methods

We analysed leaf sections in cross view of 68 Iberian taxa belonging to the subgenera Festuca, Drymanthele, and Schedonorus of the genus Festuca. Exceptionally, apart from the Iberian material, material from the French Pyrenees and from Andorra was selected. The species included and their nomenclature followed Devesa et al. (2013). The identification of the specimens was performed according to local Floras and monographs (Markgraf-Dannenberg 1980; Kerguélen and Plonka 1989; Fuente and Ortúñez 1998). Anatomical observations were based mainly on herbarium specimens from ABH, BC, COFC, FCO, GDAC, HUAL, MA, MAF, MGC, JACA, SANT and SEV (acronyms according to Thiers 2017), and also from fresh material collected in the field during the years 2012–2016 (specimens deposited in the COFC herbarium). About 400 preparations were made (several per individual). The list of plants examined anatomically, localities, and authorship of the species are given in Suppl. material 1.

Free-hand cross-sections of the penultimate innovation leaf blades were made directly on fresh or dry material, and subsequently hydrated in water, following the framework proposed by López and Devesa (1991). The cross-sections were mounted in 50% lactic acid, which helped to clear the cells. Observations and measurements were taken using a Motic BA300 light microscope equipped with an ocular micrometer. Photographs of leaf cross-sections were obtained using a Moticam 2500 digital microscope camera, and edited with Motic Images Plus 2.0 software.

The leaf anatomical characters observed were compiled from those mentioned in the literature on genus Festuca, as the outline, the pattern of abaxial and adaxial sclerenchyma arrangement, length, width (when the leaves are flat, the width was measured as the sum of the two hemilimbs), thickness at the midrib, number of vascular bundles, number of ribs, and number of bulliform cells (viewed in the grooves contiguous to the median rib). Other additional characters were added for anatomical characterization of the species, such as median vascular bundle diameter/maximum size, number of outer and inner bundle sheath cells, sclerenchyma thickness at the midrib, trichome density of the adaxial surface (glabrous, sparsely aculeate, or densely aculeate) and its length, and length and width of abaxial and adaxial epidermal cells (referred to the cell lumen from the lateral side). The terminology for the anatomical characters was based on Ellis (1976) and Metcalfe (1960). The main characters studied and positions of measurements made on each cross-section are illustrated in Fig. 1, and the main types of arrangement of sclerenchyma in Fig. 2.

Figure 1. 

Main characters observed in the leaf cross-sections and abbreviations. Lines in grey indicate measures: 1 length (only in species with conduplicate blades) 2 maximum width 3 thickness of the blade at the midrib 4 maximum size/diameter of the median vascular bundle (MVB) 5 length × width of abaxial epidermal cells (AbEC) 6 length × width of adaxial epidermal cells (AdEC). Sclerenchyma (SCL); vascular bundles (VB’sVB’s); ribs (R); trichomes (TRI); outer bundle sheath cells (OBS); and inner bundle sheath cells (IBS).

Figure 2. 

Major types of arrangement of sclerenchyma found in the leaf cross-sections. In conduplicate leaf blades: A continuous ring B interrupted continuous ring C forming abaxial strands and an adaxial strand on the median rib D with an abaxial girder at the median vascular bundle. In flat leaf blades: E complete (abaxial and adaxial) girder at the first vascular bundles, abaxial girder at the second vascular bundles, third vascular bundles without associated sclerenchyma.

Results and discussion

The studied anatomical characters in leaf cross view are summarized in Table 1. The species were grouped by subgenera and taxonomic sections according to traditional classification (Devesa et al. 2013), and subsequently were ordered by anatomical affinities. The lineage in which the fine-leaved species is located based on nuclear ITS and chloroplast trnL and trnL-F markers has been added when the molecular classification differs from the conventional one (Torrecilla and Catalán 2002; Torrecilla et al. 2004; Catalán et al. 2006, 2007; Nova et al. 2006; Inda et al. 2008). The main anatomical patterns found are discussed in relation to the two large clades recognized in molecular analyses within genus (Festuca s.str.) (Fig. 3): broad-leaved taxa and fine-leaved taxa (e.g., Charmet et al. 1997; Catalán et al. 2004; Inda et al. 2008). Illustrations of a selection of leaf cross-sections are provided in Figs 49.

Leaf anatomical characters analysed in cross-section and its variation range in Festuca species. General abbreviations: MVB, median vascular bundle; OBS, cells of outer bundle sheath; IBS, cells of inner bundle sheath. Abbreviations in the clade or lineage: Fl, fine-leaved clade; Bl, broad-leaved clade; L, lineage (see Fig. 3). Abbreviations in the outline: U, U-shaped; V, V-shaped; Y, Y-shaped; F, flat; r, rounded; e, elliptical; s, straight; a, angled; IL, innovations leaves; CL, cauline leaves. Abbreviations in the sclerenchyma pattern: C, continuous; Ci, continuous ring sometimes laterally thickened, broken or scarcely interrupted, never in strands; NP, not present; S, strands, but not in contact with the bundle sheath; G, girders. Sub-indices indicate location of the girder: MVB, presence of girder of sclerenchyma only in central vascular bundle (in fine-leaved species); LVB, presence of girder of sclerenchyma only in lateral vascular bundles (in fine-leaved species); 1, girder of sclerenchyma at first order vascular bundles; 2, girder of sclerenchyma at second order vascular bundles; 3, girder of sclerenchyma at third order vascular bundles (in broad-leaved species); * indicate girder-like extension of colourless cells near of the vascular bundles. Abbreviations in the OBS/IBS: i, OBS interrupted by sclerenchyma in the central vascular bundle; nd, no data. Abbreviations in the bulliform cells: d, developed; ud, undeveloped. Abbreviations in the trichomes of adaxial site section: E, densely aculeate; A, sparsely aculeate; G, glabrous. Numbers in square brackets indicates number of strands or strands plus girders. Letters and numbers in parentheses indicate uncommon values/character presence.

Taxa Clade, lineage Outline Abaxial sclerenchyma pattern Adaxial sclerenchyma pattern (in ribs) Vascular bundles number Ribs number Length (mm) Width (mm) Thickness at the midrib (mm) MVB max. size (µm) OBS/ IBS number Sclerenchyma thickness at the midrib (µm) Bulliform cells number Adaxial site trichomes (µm) Abaxial epidermal cells, L × W (µm) Adaxial epidermal cells, L × W (µm)
A. SUBGENUS FESTUCA
Sect. Festuca
F. hystrix Fl Ur C S[1] 3 1 0.44–0.60 0.52–0.70 0.33–0.44 70–87.5 12–16/ 19–22 37.5–75 3(5), ud E, 12.5–37.5 (67.5) 7.5–20 × 5–10 7.5–12.5 × 5
F. reverchonii Fl Ur C (Ci) S[1] 3 1 0.32–0.46 0.30–0.46 0.19–0.25 70–77.5 13–15/ 20–25 10–20 5(6), ud E, 15–37.5 7.5–12.5 × 5–7.5 7.5–12.5 × 5–10
F. airoides Fl Ur–e C NP or S[1] 5–7 1 0.54–0.68 0.37–0.52 0.24–0.30 67.50–80 10–13/ 21–23 12.5–50 3(4), ud E(A), 15–47.5 7.5–15 × 5–10 7.5–12.5 × 5–10
F. niphobia Fl Ue C NP or S[1] (5)7 1 0.56–0.75 0.43–0.50 0.27–0.32 67.5–85 12–13/ 19–23 27.5–42.5 3, ud E, 17.5–50 7.5–12.5 × 7.5–12.5 7.5–12.5 × 2.5–7.5
F. brigantina subsp. brigantina Fl Ue C NP 5–7 1 0.60–0.91 0.44–0.69 0.31–0.39 72.5–100 8–15/ 18–24 22.5–67.5 4–5, ud E, 10–87.5 10–27.5 × 7.5–15 7.5–17.5 × 5–10
F. gracilior Fl Ue–r C (Ci) NP 7 1–3 0.52–0.73 (0.80) 0.32–0.54 0.19–0.28 62.5–85 11–13/ 19–23 27.5–60 3–5, ud E, 10–50 12.5–20 × 7.5–12.5 5–12.5 × 5–7.5
F. michaelis Fl Vs or Ue C (Ci) NP 7 (1)3 0.64–0.93 0.49–0.65 0.28–0.36 77.5–112.5 9–12/ 19–24 12.5–52.5 3, ud E, 15–75 (112.5) 12.5–25 × 7.5–17.5 7.5–15 × 5–10
F. valentina Fl Ue–r C NP or S[1–3] 5–7 3(5) 0.72–0.80 (1.05) 0.51–0.74 0.30–0.47 82.5–112.5 9–14/ 19–25 50–82.5 3–4(5), ud E, 15–95 7.5–27.5 × 5–15 7.5–15 × 5–10
F. ochroleuca Fl Vs or Ue C (Ci) NP 7(9) 1–3 0.54–0.86 0.42–0.69 0.20–0.33 65–107.5 7–13/ 16–27 15–55 3–4, ud E, 22.5–40 12.5–20 × 7.5–12.5 7.5–12.5 × 5–10
F. longiauriculata Fl Ue–r C NP or S[1–3] 7 1–3 0.51–0.84 (0.90) 0.50–0.68 (0.81) 0.30–0.41 (0.43) 77.5–87.5 11–17/ 20–24 42.5–82.5 3–5, ud E, 25–87.5 5–12.5 × 7.5–12.5 7.5–12.5 × 2.5–7.5
F. vettonica Fl Ue C S[3] (NP) 7 3 0.73–0.84 0.58–0.69 0.31–0.36 75.0–82.5 11–12/ 20–24 37.5–67.5 3, ud E, 25.0–75.0 7.5–17.5 × 7.5–15 12.5–20 × 5–7.5
F. aragonensis Fl Ue C (Ci) NP or S[1] 5–7 1 0.52–0.73 (0.81) (0.34)
0.44–0.50
0.25–0.36 65–100 9–16/ 19–24 20–57.5 2–3(4), ud E, 12.5–75 12.5–20 × 7.5–17.5 10–15 × 7.5–10
F. carpetana Fl Ue C NP or S[1–2] 7(8) 1–3(5) (0.60) 0.69–1.17 (0.50)
0.61–0.89
0.31–0.43 (0.50) 70–115 8–13/ 19–27 25–70 3–6, ud E, 25–100 7.5–15 × 7.5–12.5 7.5–15 × 5–10
F. summilusitana Fl Ue C NP or S[1–3] (5)6–9 (10) 1–3(5) 0.66–1.20 (1.41) 0.54–0.88 0.26–0.55 (0.60) 70–152.5 7–17/ 21–28 12.5–97.5 3–5, ud E, 27.5–122.5 7.5–22.5 × 7.5–20 7.5–15 × 5–12.5
F. gredensis Fl Ue C NP or S[1–3] 7–9 1–3(5) 0.67–1.34 (0.53)
0.57– 0.94
0.32–0.49 (0.53) 85.0–155.0 9–14/ 19–24 20–50 3–5, ud E, 15–112.5 (125.0) 10–25 × 7.5–20 10–17.5 × 5–10
F. altopyrenaica Fl Ue or Vs C (Ci) NP 7 1–3 0.90–1.15 0.61–0.95 0.31–0.41 75–112.5 8–12/ 19–23 22.5–32.5 3, ud E, 27.5–75 (150) 10–20 × 7.5–20 7.5–12.5 × (5)7.5–10
F. yvesii Fl Ue or Vs C NP 7–9 1–3 0.80–1.18 (0.57)
0.72–0.90
0.33–0.44 (0.50) 95–125 10–15/ 20–26 25–80 3–5, ud E, 25–87.5 12.5–25 × 10–20 10–15 × 7.5–10
F. indigesta Fl Ue C NP or S[1–3] 7–9(11) (1)3(5) 0.80–1.52 0.75–1.11 0.35–0.57 117.5–130 13–15/ 20–26 62.5–87.5 3–5, ud E, 45–125 (158) 10–15 × 7.5–12.5 7.5–17.5 × 5–10
F. segimonensis Fl Ur C S[3] 5–7(9) 3 0.70–1.1 (1.3) 0.69–1.02 0.38–0.67 80–107 (125) 10–16/ 20–26 37.5–50 4–6, ud E, 32.5–100 12.5–17.5 × 7.5–12.5 12.5–20 × 5–7.5
F. clementei Fl, L3 Ur–s C, Ci, S [(3)5–7] or S+GMVB S[1–3] 7 3(4) 0.45–0.58 0.52–0.66 0.28–0.38 62.5–72.5 11–14/ 19–22 75–175 3–7, ud E, 10–55 7.5–15 × 5–12.5 5–12.5 × 5–15
F. liviensis Fl Ue C (Ci) NP (8)9 3 (0.87)0.91–1.06 0.63–0.89 0.31–0.34 95–117.5 11–14/ 27–30 30–60 3–6, ud E, 12.5–82.5 12.5–25 × 7.5–15 7.5–15 × 5–10
F. glauca Fl Ue C (Ci) NP 7(10) 1–3 0.79–1.15 0.55–0.76 0.30–0.36 85–107.5 11–12/ 24 40–50 3–4, ud E, 50–125 17.5–37.5 × 15–32.5 7.5–17.5 × 5–12.5
F. vasconcensis Fl Ue–r C NP 5–7 1 0.75–0.97 0.66–0.85 0.35–0.45 85–115 8–13/ 19–25 15–30 3–5, ud E, 10–55 15–37.5 × 10–25 10–20 × 5–17.5
F. brigantina subsp. actiophyta Fl Ue–r Ci or S[3–6] NP 3–5 1 0.46–0.62 (0.94) 0.40–0.61 (0.87) 0.26–0.35 (0.48) 65–90 (100) 6–9/ 16–20 12.5–25 4–6, ud E, 15–37.5 15–35 × 10–25 12.5–25 × 7.5–20
F. marginata subsp. alopecuroides Fl Ue or Vs S[3] (C) NP 7 3 0.75–0.90 0.47–0.62 0.29–0.40 80–117.5 10–15/ 21–27 10–100 3–4, ud E, 25–47.5 10–25 × 7.5–15 7.5–15 × 5–15
F. rivas-martinezii Fl Ue or Vs S[3] (C) NP 7(9) 3 0.70–1.02 0.60–0.90 0.25–0.44 85–117.5 11–22/ 21–33 (37) 35–60(95) 3–5, ud E, (10)15–115 15–22.5 × 7.5–20 5–12.5 × 5–10
F. marginata subsp. andres-molinae Fl Ue Vs or Y S[3] (C) NP 7 (1)3 0.50–0.85 0.33–0.56 0.22–0.36 70–95 10–11/ 20–27 40–85 (1)3, ud E, 10–60 15–22.5 × 7.5–10 5–12.5 × 7.5–10
F. marginata subsp. marginata Fl Ue, Vs or Y S NP 7(9) (1)3 0.60–1.05 0.37–0.63 0.27–0.39 77.5–112.5 13–14/ 22–30 37.5–112.5 3–4, ud E, (15)20–42.5 15–25 × 7.5–15 5–12.5 × 5–7.5
F. frigida Fl Ue or V S[3] NP 3 1 0.40–0.54 0.30–0.46 0.20–0.29 52.5–62.5 9–10/ 18–20 12.5–17.5 2–4, ud A, 25–37.5 10–20 × 7.5–12.5 7.5–12.5 × 5–12.5
F. alpina Fl Ue or Vs(a) S[3] NP 3–4 1–3 0.45 0.36 0.20 57.5 12/ 17–20 30 4–5, ud A, 25–37.5 15–20 (22.5) × 10–15 7.5–12.5 × 7.5–12.5
F. glacialis Fl Ue S[3–5(7)] NP 3–5 1–3 0.34–0.62 (0.24)
0.32–0.46
0.16–0.28 52.5–82.5 9–13/ 14–22 15–25 4–6, ud E, 10–72.5 15–22.5 × 7.5–15 7.5–12.5 × 5–10
F. plicata Fl, L3 Va S or S+GMVB [5(6)] NP or S[1] 3(4) 1(2) 0.47–0.54 0.40–0.51 0.29–0.36 57.5–67.5 8–10/ 16–20 25–107.5 3–4, ud A, 17.5–58 15–27.5 × 7.5–12.5 (20) 7.5–20 × 5–12.5
F. capillifolia Fl, L3 Ua S+GMVB (S) [7(9)] NP or S[1–3] 5–7 1–3 0.35–0.61 0.43–0.59 0.19–0.30 67.5–75 10–13 (16)/ 15–23 25–142.5 3, ud E, 50–77 (110) 22.5–30 × 12.5–32.5 7.5–10 × 5–12.5
F. ampla Fl, L2 Ue–r or Ua GVB[7–9] S[3–5] (6)7(8) (4)5 (0.44)0.52–0.78 0.50–0.8 (0.9) 0.21–0.32 (0.34) 72.5–112.5 9–12 (16)/ 17–23 45–120 3–6, ud E(A), 17.5–55 12.5–32.5 × 10–25 10–25 × 10–20
F. querana Fl, L2 Ue or Vs S+GLVB[5] NP 7–9(10) 3 0.72–1.01 0.41–0.55 0.20–0.35 80–92.5 12–13/ 22–23 50–70 4–5, ud E or A, 15–30 12.5–17.5 × 7.5–12.5 7.5–15 × 7.5–12.5
F. borderei Fl, L3 Ue or Vs(a) S+GMVB[7–9] NP (S[1]) 7–9 5 0.66–0.96 0.55–0.73 0.24–0.35 62.5–85 10–14/ 22–24 87.5–125 4–7, ud E, 32.5–87.5 12.5–25 × 7.5–15 (22.5) 7.5–15 × 5–10
F. henriquesii Fl F(V) S[(3)5–7(8)] S[5–7] 7–9(15) 5–7(9) 2.0–3.36 0.31–0.44 100–120 14–16/ 21–29 32.5–37.5 6, d G or A, 22.5–30 10–20(25) × 10–17.5 7.5–17.5 × 7.5–15 (17.5)
Sect. Aulaxyper
F. rubra subsp. rubra Fl Vs S[7(10)] NP 5–7(8) 3–5(6) 0.55–1.25 0.40–0.75 (1.3) 0.25–0.42 67.5–102.5 9–10/ 18–20 15–72.5 4–6, ud E, 22.5–55(105) 15–32.5 × 12.5–30 10–22.5 × 10–22.5 (27.5)
F. rubra subsp. juncea Fl Va S[5–7] NP or S[1] (6)7 3–5 0.79–1.08 0.54–0.81 0.37–0.45 92.5–112.5 10–12/ 17–22 100–132.5 3–7, ud A or E, 12.5–37.5 17.5–25 × 12.5–22.5 10–22.5 × 7.5–17.5
F. rubra subsp. pruinosa Fl Vs–a (U) S[7] NP 5(7) 3 (0.71) 0.78–1 0.58–0.75 0.35–0.56 77.5–105 8–12/ 18–25 37.5–125 4–5, ud E, 15–37.5 17.5–35 × 17.5–37.5 7.5–17.5 × 5–17.5
F. iberica Fl Vs S[5–7] NP (3)5(7) (1)3 0.36–0.63 (0.71) 0.33–0.52 0.19–0.34 62.5–85 9–12/ 17–22 30–50(100) 3–5, ud E, (10)20–75(125) 17.5–27.5 × 10–22.5 10–17.5 × 7.5–20
F. trichophylla Fl Vs S[(6)7] NP (4)5 1–3 0.47–0.57 0.33–0.49 0.24–0.30 57.5–90 9–12/ 15–19 50–62.5 3–5, ud E, 25–62.5(107.5) 17.5–32.5 × 12.5–35 (42.5) 7.5–17.5 × 7.5–15
F. rivularis Fl Vs S[5–7(8)] NP 5–7 3(5) 0.61–1.06 0.55–0.90 0.29–0.50 85–92.5 9–12/ 17–21 14–20 3–5, ud E, (18)25–100(120) 15–30 × 12.5–25 (37.5) 10–25 × 7.5–30
F. nigrescens Fl Vs S[(6)7] NP 5(6) 3 (0.42)0.59–0.80 0.38–0.60 0.20–0.35 62.5–77.5 8–9/ 17–19 35–77.5 4–5, ud E(A), (10)20–37.5 15–30 × 12.5–20 7.5–17.5 × 7.5–20
F. nevadensis Fl V S[(5)7–9] S[5–7] 7(9) 5–7(8) (0.65)0.75–1.30 0.74–1.25 0.23–0.45 82.5–120 9–13/ 16–21 50–120 3–5, ud E, (20)42.5–125 (158) 20–40 × 12.5–37.5 12.5–22.5 × 7.5–15
F. rothmaleri Fl V S[8–10] NP 7–9 5–7 (0.56)0.79–1.07 0.41–0.85 (0.22)0.33–0.37 80–95 9–11/ 18–22 50–100 6–7, ud E, (13)25–75(113) 12.5–30 × 12.5–27.5 7.5–17.5 × 7.5–22.5
F. pyrenaica Fl, L3 Vs S[9(11)] NP or S[3] 7(9) 5(7) 0.57–0.92 0.52–0.61 0.17–0.25 57.5–75 9–10/ 15–21 22.5–25 3–4, ud E, 15–37.5 12.5–20 × 10–20 7.5–15 (17.5) × 5–15
F. juncifolia Fl Ur–a C or S[(6)7] (GMVB) S[3–5] 7 3–5 0.67–0.98 (1.55) 0.61–0.86 0.31–0.39 (0.47) 85–100 9–12/ 18–22 47.5–52.5 3–5, ud E, 12.5–85 12.5–30 × 17.5–32.5 7.5–17.5 × 5–17.5
F. heterophylla subsp. heterophylla Fl IL. Va S[5] NP 3 1 0.36–0.39 0.34–0.41 0.23–0.26 47.5–67.5 nd/ 14–18 15–27.5 4–5, ud A, 17.5–37.5 12.5–5 × 5–12.5 7.5–15 × 5–10
CL. F S[9] NP 7 5 2.32 0.16 85 nd/ 18 35–50 4–5, d E, 10–102.5 12.5–30 × 10–20 10–15 × 10–12.5 (20)
F. heterophylla subsp. braun-blanquetii Fl IL. Va S[(6)7] NP 5–7 3 0.64–0.68 0.53–0.61 0.27–0.31 75–82.5 8–10/ 19–21 32.5–37.5 3–5, ud A, 10–25 12.5–25 × 10–17.5 7.5–15 × 7.5–15
CL. F S[9] NP 10 9–10 3.43 0.33 92.5 9/ 20 22.5 4–5, d A, 12.5–14 (G) 17.5–27.5 × 12.5–15 7.5–20 × 5–20
Sect. Eskia
F. eskia Fl Ue (F) C S[(6)7–13] 10–13 (17) 7–11 (13) (0.75)0.89–1.10 (1.47) 0.72–1.02 (3.23) 0.27–0.38 80–102.5 10–13/ 17–22 30–75 3–5, ud E, (13)20–65 (70) 7.5–20 × 5–12.5 7.5–12.5 × 5–10
F. × picoeuropeana Fl Ue–a C S[3–5(7)] 7(9) 3–5(7) 0.57–0.87 0.55–0.73 0.25–0.33 72.5–87.5 8–14/ 17–21 35–47.5 3–7, ud E, 20–52.5 5–20 × 5–15 5–10 × 5–7.5
F. burnatii Fl Ue C, Ci or S[7] S[4–5(6)] (5)7(9) 4–5(6) (0.38)0.47–0.80 (0.90) 0.32–0.60 (0.19)0.26–0.32 (0.47) 57.5–8 7–10/ 13–16 20–62.5 3–5, ud E, (17.5)22.5–57.5 17.5–30 × 10–17.5 7.5–12.5 × 7.5–10
F. elegans Fl Ue C NP 5 1 0.47–0.67 (0.70) 0.40–0.53 0.18–0.26 (0.30) 112.5–170 11–15/ 21–34 12.5–25 3–4, ud E, (15)35–70 10–17.5 × 7.5–17.5 7.5–12.5 × 5–10
F. gautieri Fl Ua C, Ci or S[7–9] NP 5–7 1 0.44–0.67 0.53–0.60 0.28–0.46 72.5–92.5 9–14/ 17–24 25–75 4–7, ud E, (10)20–42.5(47) 12.5–20 × 10–20 5–10 × 5–7.5
Sect. Subbulbosae
F. baetica Bl Ur (Ci or Ci+)G1,2 (S3) G*1 17–23 3 1.03–1.66 0.99–1.64 0.49–0.74 142.5–200 18–25/ 30–36 105–232.5 4–7, d E, 7.5–27.5(32) 10–22.5 × 5–10 7.5–15 × 5–15
F. paniculata s.l. Bl Ur (Vs or F) (C or Ci+)G(*)1+S2,3 G*1(S2,3) 13–20 3–9 1.0–2.14 0.95–1.96 (4.18) 0.35–0.53 90–132.5 13–15/ 20–30 50–150 4–10, d or ud A, (7)10–22(30) 15–32.5 × 7.5–25 7.5–17.5 × 7.5–17.5
F. durandoi Bl Ur or Vs S[10–13] NP or S[1–2] 11–13 1–3 0.66–0.89 0.66–0.95 0.29–0.36 75–92.5 11–12/ 19–22 47.5–62.5 4–7, d or ud A, 7.5–27.5(G) 15–27.5 × 10–25 5–17.5 × 7.5–15
Sect. Lojaconoa
F. coerulescens Bl F G1,2,3 G1,2,3 10–14 8–12 1.67–2.25 0.20–0.26 90–110 i/ 18–22 27.5–42.5 4–7, d G or A, 5–12.5 7.5–17.5 × 10–17.5 7.5–12.5 × 7.5–15
F. patula Bl F G1,2+S3 G1+S2,3 12–17 11–16 (1.57)2.22–4.46 0.15–0.35 75–107.5 i/ 20–21 20–50 4–9, d G 25–47.5 (57.5) × 17.5–42.5 10–20 × 7.5–17.5
Sect. Scariosae
F. scariosa Bl Ur (F) C(Ci)+G1,2,3 G*1,2 14–19 11–15 (0.74)0.89–1.67 0.97–2.39 0.37–0.54 117.5–132.5 14–16 (i)/ 26–30 75–112.5 4–7, d or ud A(E), 20–37.5(38) 7.5–15 × 2.5–10 5–12.5 × 5–10
Sect. Pseudoscariosa
F. pseudeskia Bl Ur (F) G(*)1,2(G3) G*1,2 15–18 5–8(9) 1.23–2.32 1.12–2.37 (2.72) 0.41–0.63 85–112.5 8–13/ 19–27 185–225 4–5, d or ud E, 25–42.5 10–15 × 7.5–12.5 7.5–17.5 × 5–7.5
B. SUBGENUS DRYMANTHELE
Sect. Phaeochloa
F. altissima Bl F G1,2,3 G1,2,3 25–32 23–30 5.44–10.16 0.12–0.27 87.5–92.5 i/ 18–22 22.5–47.5 5, d G(A), 15–30 7.5–17.5 × 12.5–27.5 5–7.5 × 7.5–15
F. lasto Bl F G1,2,3 G1,2,3 40–45 39–44 10.13–16.58 (20) (0.20)0.26–0.38 105–137.5 i / 22–29 52.5–95 5–7, d A, 7.5–45 10–15 × 10–22.5 7.5–15 × 10–17.5
C. SUBGENUS SCHEDONORUS
Sect. Schedonorus
F. mediterranea Bl F G1+S2 S*1,2 7–20 (7)12–18 (1)1.24–7.09 0.23–0.34 82.5–110 11–17/ 18–25 57.5–80 (3)5–7, d A, 15–37.5 10–15 × 20–25 12.5–22.5 × 17.5–25
F. interrupta Bl F G1,2+S3 G*1,2 12–20 10–19 1.76–6.48 0.31–0.39 95–125 13–16/ 24–25 77.5–105 6–8, d G or A, 30–42.5 10–15 × 12.5–22.5 12.5–22.5 × 12.5–27.5
F. arundinacea Bl F G1,2(S3) G*1+S2(S3) 13–17 11–15 4.30–12 0.23–0.28 (0.37) 95–130 12–15/ 22–24 62.5–75 5–9, d G(A), 25–42.5 12.5–22.5 × 17.5–25 12.5–27.5 × 12.5–25
Sect. Plantynia
F. gigantea Bl F G1,2,3 G1,2,3 29–35 29–31 13–14.13 0.30–0.32 100–120 i/ 20–23 82.5–117.5 5–6, d G(A), 22.5–30 12.5–30 × 17.5–30 (37.5) 12.5–20 × 12.5–30 (37.5)
Figure 3. 

Simplified cladogram showing the major supraspecific relations in Festuca s.str., based and adapted on phylogenetic trees from Catalán et al. (2004), and Inda et al. (2008). Main leaf anatomical patterns are exemplified in each line evolutive. Abbreviations: L1, lineage 1; L2, lineage 2; and L3, lineage 3. Asterisks indicate sections which have been included in other subgenera by several authors (sect. Phaeochloa in the subgenus Drymanthele, and sects. Schedonorus and Plantynia in the subgenus Schedonorus).

Figure 4. 

Leaf cross-sections of the Festuca sect. Festuca species from lineage 1. A F. hystrix B F. reverchonii C F. segimonensis D F. indigesta E F. michaelis F F. glauca G F. vasconcensis H F. brigantina subsp. actiophyta (the arrow indicates inflated adaxial epidermal cells) I F. marginata subsp. andres-molinae J F. rivas-martinezii K F. frigida L F. alpina M F. glacialis. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Leaf anatomy in the Festuca species of the fine-leaved clade

The fine-leaved fescues (see Fig. 3) present the outline of the blade in the transverse section usually conduplicate (from U- to V- or Y-shaped) and they usually do not exceed 1.5 mm in length, except for F. henriquesii and some rare forms of F. eskia with flat leaves (up to 3.3 mm wide). The sclerenchyma may be arranged in a continuous ring or forming strands that occasionally contact with the median or lateral vascular bundles, but never forming complete (abaxial and adaxial) sclerenchyma girders. The bulliform cells located in the intercostal zones are inconspicuous, and may even be absent (Table 1A, Figs 47).

This group comprises 3 taxonomic sections (sects. Festuca, Aulaxyper, and Eskia) which have been segregated into 4 different lineages according to the molecular phylogenies (e.g., Torrecilla et al. 2004; see Fig. 3). In those analyses, the location of some species from sects. Festuca (subsects. Festuca and Exaratae) and Aulaxyper differs slightly with the conventional classification (Fig. 3).

Festuca sect. Festuca

The sect. Festuca (34 species analysed) in its traditional circumscription has the most diversity in anatomical features among the fine-leaved species. Three main patterns were observed regarding the arrangement of the sclerenchyma. The first pattern arranges sclerenchyma in a continuous ring, sometimes interrupted by just a few cells. The second pattern presents the sclerenchyma arranged in strands at the margins and midrib, rarely opposite the vascular bundles. The third pattern shows strands opposite the vascular bundles, frequently contacting the median or lateral vascular bundles (namely abaxial girder).

In the first pattern, the leaf is always conduplicate, often U-shaped and from elliptic to orbicular in outline, and may present from 3 to 9 (rarely 11) vascular bundles and from 1 to 3 (rarely 5) inconspicuous, slightly rounded ribs, with or without adaxial sclerenchyma strands (Table 1A, Fig. 4A–G). This is the most frequent anatomical model among the species of the sect. Festuca (subsect. Festuca) that dominate in high mountain pastures (about 21 species), although it is also present in the coastal taxa F. vasconcensis, F. glauca, and F. brigantina subsp. actiophyta (Table 1A).

Traditionally, the species of sect. Festuca with this anatomical pattern have been included within the broad “F. ovina complex”, which in turn includes groups of species with greater or lesser taxonomic difficulty (cf. Cebolla and Rivas Ponce 1999; Foggi et al. 2006; Pyke 2013; López et al. 2016). As in most species of the sect. Festuca, they have intravaginal innovations and sheaths usually open, as well as great morphological similarity. Almost all of these species grow in places that are dry, windswept, and nutrient deficient. They share a set of anatomical xeromorphic features such as strongly conduplicate leaves, of greater diameter in cross-section, highly developed sclerenchyma on the abaxial face, thick cell walls and abundant cutinization, small-sized lumen of the epidermal cells, bulliform cells barely visible or very small and relatively undifferentiated from the rest, and high density of trichomes on the adaxial face (Fig. 4). Many studies have indicated that the thickness of the sclerenchyma, and sometimes its arrangement and distribution, may vary depending on the environmental conditions, age and development of the leaf (Aiken and Consaul 1995). The sclerenchymatous protection may have played a major role in the survival of many grass species in such extreme ecological environments, since it confers mechanical support and protection, and contribute to rolling or folding of leaves, reducing water loss in drought conditions (Wrobel et al. 2007). The amount of basal sclerenchyma (maximum values of sclerenchyma found in F. valentina, F. longiauriculata, F. indigesta, and F. summilusitana), pubescence, and the size of the trichomes (maximum density and values in F. summilusitana, F. gredensis, F. indigesta, and F. glauca) are characters with high variability at intra- and inter-species levels, and could be a response to micro-environmental differences, therefore those have been considered just as descriptive characters (Connor 1960; Aiken and Consaul 1995; Ramesar-Fortner et al. 1995).

The length of the leaf section and the number of vascular bundles and ribs facilitated species distinction such as F. hystrix and F. reverchonii, the species of this group with the smallest diameters, characterized by having 3 vascular bundles and 1 median rib with sclerenchyma (Table 1A, Fig. 4A, B). These two species also present unique morphological characters within Festuca sect. Festuca such as the apex of the leaf being noticeably flattened in the first, and helicoid and scabrous leaves in the latter (Ortúñez et al. 1995). The remaining species show a considerable overlap of these characters which hampers the identification based solely on their leaf anatomy (Table 1A). For example, anatomy was useless to discriminate the species of the most complex groups within the sect. Festuca, as seen in the species studied of the “F. inops group” (F. michaelis, F. inops, and F. valentina), and for the species of the “F. indigesta group” (e.g., F. indigesta, F. summilusitana, F. gredensis, and F. yvesii, among others) (Table 1A). Within the latter group, only for F. segimonensis the leaf anatomy helped in its identification as the taxon has a more or less orbicular outline and presents adaxial sclerenchyma strands on its 3 ribs, which are more pronounced (with somewhat compressed bases) than in the other species (Fig. 4C).

Coastal species tend to have the largest abaxial epidermal cells (most visible in F. glauca; Fig. 4F), although with overlapping and not significant values. Generally, their subepidermal cells on the adaxial face are more or less inflated, which is a highly variable character even within the same population but that has been used by Fuente and Ortúñez (1998) to distinguish between F. vasconcensis (Fig. 4G) and other species. This character is also observed in F. brigantina subsp. actiophyta (absent in F. brigantina subsp. brigantina), another coastal taxon that was described from ultrabasic rocks of the northwest Iberian Peninsula (cf. Gutiérrez Villarías et al. 1997) and which is variable in the sclerenchyma arrangement (Table 1A, Fig. 4H). In this sense, it has been noted that, in addition to thick adaxial epidermis, plants growing near the sea present other adaptations against water loss under conditions of salt stress such as more-developed bulliform cells and atypical vascular bundles (Giełwanowska et al. 2005), although these characters were not observed in this study.

The molecular analyses group together all the species of sect. Festuca with continuous (or more or less interrupted) sclerenchyma within the first lineage of the fine-leaved clade (mostly subsect. Festuca species) (Fig. 3). Only F. clementei (Fig. 5F), a species that may have both continuous and discontinuous sclerenchyma, falls into lineage 3 together with the species of Festuca subsect. Exaratae and others close taxa (Fig. 3). Interestingly, in this species, the basal sclerenchyma is thicker and occasionally contacts the median vascular bundle (Table 1A), an anatomical feature that also appears in other phylogenetically related species (see below).

Figure 5. 

Leaf cross-sections of the Festuca sect. Festuca species from lineage 2: A F. querana B F. ampla; from lineage 3: C F. borderei D F. capillifolia E F. plicata F F. clementei; and unknown: G F. henriquesii. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

In the second pattern within sect. Festuca, the strands never make contact with the vascular bundles, and two variants can be recognized. The first variant is characterized by 3 strands of sclerenchyma, two marginal (apical in the cross-section) and one at midrib (basal in the cross-section), sometimes even visible externally on the leaf. The leaves are conduplicate, with elliptical cross-section, or in a V- or Y-shape, from 0.5 to 1 mm in length, with 7 (rarely 9) vascular bundles and 3 (more rarely 1) ribs without adaxial sclerenchyma strands (Table 1A). This pattern is present in F. marginata subsp. alopecuroides, F. marginata subsp. andres-molinae, F. marginata subsp. marginata, and F. rivas-martinezii which have traditionally been included in the “F. marginata group” (Fig. 4I, J). They are distributed over the centre, east, and northeast of the Iberian Peninsula, and some reach France. Some anatomical characters have been used in the taxonomy of this group such the ribs shape, which varies between rounded to more rarely truncate, and does not discriminate among these taxa, and the decurrence of the sclerenchyma strands (Kerguélen and Plonka 1989; Cebolla and Rivas Ponce 2003b). In the species studied, the arrangement of the marginal strands is very variable but that of the basal strand has taxonomic utility (although its observation requires some practice). It is decurrent in F. marginata subsp. alopecuroides and F. rivas-martinezii (Fig. 4J), and truncate and no decurrent in F. marginata subsp. marginata and F. marginata subsp. andres-molinae (Fig. 4I). Very rarely, the sclerenchyma was found to be continuous (Table 1A), making it very difficult in these cases to identify them from other “F. ovina complex” species. The species that share this anatomical pattern are included in lineage 1 of the fine-leaved clade (Festuca subsect. Festuca; Fig. 3). The AFLP and RADP markers seem to group these species together, although the trnL chloroplast marker does not discriminate affinities (Nova et al. 2006). In the second variant, the sclerenchyma may be arranged on the margins and the midrib, or also occasionally opposite some vascular bundles (Fig. 4K–M). The leaves are also conduplicate, but differ from the previous variant because the length of the leaf section is much smaller (0.34–0.62 mm), there are fewer vascular bundles (3 to 5), and the sclerenchyma strands are usually thinner, in addition to the adaxial trichomes being less abundant (Table 1A). This leaf model is that presented by the “F. alpina group” species which live in the alpine or subalpine habitats of the north (F. alpina and F. glacialis) and southeast (F. frigida) of the Iberian Peninsula. They are characterized by their small size, flexible leaves, and short panicles with few spikelets (López et al. 2016). The three species are phylogenetically very close (Catalán et al. 2007), and appear grouped within the lineage 1 (Festuca subsect. Festuca; Fig. 3).

In the third pattern, the sclerenchyma is opposite the vascular bundles, and frequently with an abaxial girder on the medial or lateral vascular bundle (Fig. 5A–E). This group includes species with anatomical characteristics intermediate between those of the previous species (lineage 1) and those of lineage 2 (mostly sect. Aulaxyper species, see below and Fig. 3). The majority of these species have a conduplicate leaf, and many of them are easily recognizable by their anatomy (Table 1A), an example being F. plicata (Fig. 5E) which has a trigonal or rhombic outline. Festuca capillifolia (Fig. 5D) presents an angular (polygonal) outline and differs from anatomically similar species such as F. ampla (Fig. 5B) because it does not present adaxial sclerenchyma on all of its ribs. Festuca querana (Fig. 5A) has a smooth outline and presents a more developed lateral abaxial sclerenchyma than the other species, even making contact with the vascular bundles, and neither does it present sclerenchyma on the ribs. The leaf anatomy of F. borderei (Fig. 5C) is similar to the previous species but it has a greater number of strands that in no case or very rarely contact the lateral vascular bundles and neither fuse abaxially. Interestingly, these anatomically heterogeneous species with unique anatomical patterns fall into a different clade from that formed by most species of sect. Festuca in the molecular trees (Catalán et al. 2004). Thus, F. capillifolia and F. borderei, which were already separated from the rest in the subsect. Exaratae due to morphological differences in their leaf sheaths (Saint-Yves 1922), are also differentiated in molecular phylogenies, being placed in a basal position (lineage 3) with respect to subsect. Festuca (lineage 1) and sect. Aulaxyper (lineage 2) (see Fig. 3). Festuca plicata seems to be more related to some species of the genus Vulpia and to the two previous species than to the rest of the species of subsect. Festuca (Catalán et al. 2004). Finally, F. ampla and F. querana are grouped together with the species of sect. Aulaxyper (Catalán et al. 2004; Nova et al. 2006), with which they share some anatomical characteristics.

Within this section, only one species, F. henriquesii (Table 1A, Fig. 5G), has a flat (or very broad V-shaped) leaf, with adaxial and abaxial strands on the margins and at the level of the vascular bundles which they do not make contact. Although there are no data on the phylogenetic relationships of this species, its leaf anatomy and some morphological characters such as closed leaf sheaths (Fuente and Ortúñez 1995) make it seem to be more related to the species of sect. Aulaxyper than those of sect. Festuca.

Festuca sect. Aulaxyper

Almost all the species of this section (10 species analysed) share a pattern of abaxial sclerenchyma distribution of the leaves in strands opposite each of the vascular bundles, and at the leaf margins (Fig. 6). Although not very frequent, some species may present adaxial sclerenchyma on the ribs, which are well defined in this group. The leaves are frequently conduplicate, and exceptionally the cauline leaves may be flat (Table 1A). Only in F. juncifolia (Fig. 6A), a species that grows in the dunes and coastal sands in the north of the Iberian Peninsula, the abaxial strands frequently make contact forming a continuous or slightly disrupted ring. In most species, the leaf section has a polygonal outline (e.g., F. iberica and F. nigrescens; Fig. 6F, G), sometimes carinate (e.g., F. rivularis and F. heterophylla; Fig. 6C, H1, I), although with a great diversity of forms transitioning towards V-shaped (e.g., F. rothmaleri and F. nevadensis; Fig. 6D, E), and more rarely orbicular (F. juncifolia; Fig. 6A) or obovoid (some forms of F. rubra subsp. pruinosa, a species that is highly polymorphous in outline; Fig. 6B).

The only Iberian species of the genus with leaf dimorphism is F. heterophylla s.l., in which the cauline leaves are flat (Fig. 6H2) but those of the innovations are conduplicate and very narrow (especially in the subsp. heterophylla) (Fig. 6H1, I). In general, in the species of this section the abaxial epidermis cells are larger than those of the sect. Festuca (especially those in lineage 1), although variation in size was observed throughout the leaf cross-section, with greater values in the sides of the keel (remarkably in F. rivularis; Fig. 6). In addition, some of them are easily recognizable by their scalloped abaxial surface seen in cross-section (e.g., F. iberica and F. trichophylla; detail in Fig. 6F vs. not scalloped in Fig. 6D). In relation to the adaxial epidermis cells, it stands out that they are inflated in almost all the species of sect. Aulaxyper (Fig. 6, detail in Fig. 6H1), not only the coastal species as was the case in sect. Festuca. The thickness of the sclerenchyma strands, which has in some cases been used to separate some species (F. nigrescens vs. F. iberica), was found to be a very variable character, calling into question the taxonomic value that it had been given (Table 1A, Fig. 6F, G).

The species of sect. Aulaxyper (“F. rubra complex”) are characterized morphologically by their extravaginal innovations, with reddish-brown closed leaf sheath, generally fibrous (Hackel 1882). Most species live in woodland and meadows, on wet soils, and many are widely distributed throughout central, northern, and southwestern Europe (Markgraf-Dannenberg 1980). All the species of this group with the exception of F. pyrenaica (lineage 3) fall into lineage 2 (see Fig. 3), although, as also is the case in the sect. Festuca, the phylogenetic relationships between the species are not well defined. In F. pyrenaica the outline is elliptical or obovate, and neither does it present a girder in the median vascular bundle (Fig. 6J).

Figure 6. 

Leaf cross-sections of Iberian species of the Festuca sect. Aulaxyper from lineage 2: A F. juncifolia B F. rubra subsp. pruinosa C F. rivularis D F. rothmaleri (in detail abaxial surface not scalloped) E F. nevadensis F F. iberica (in detail scalloped abaxial surface) G F. nigrescens H F. heterophylla subsp. braun-blanquetii (H1 innovation leaf, in detail inflated adaxial epidermal cells; H2 cauline leaf) I F. heterophylla subsp. heterophylla (innovation leaf); and from lineage 3: J F. pyrenaica. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Festuca sect. Eskia

The most frequent anatomical model for the species of this section is the sclerenchyma arranged in a continuous ring (Fig. 7A–E1), sometimes interrupted or forming irregular and decurrent strands as in F. burnatii (Fig. 7C), and only in F. gautieri might the sclerenchyma be continuous or arranged in well-defined or decurrent strands at the level of the vascular bundles (Fig. 7E2). The leaves are strongly conduplicate, although occasionally an individual of F. eskia was detected with more or less flat leaves (Fig. 7A2), both in the shoots from the sterile innovations and in the cauline leaves. This type of leaf was found in a plant that was growing in grassy and wet pastureland under the shelter of a rock, so it is possible that these variations are the result of phenotypic plasticity strongly influenced by environmental conditions. In fact, some Festuca species which have strongly folded leaves in dry places have been observed to have more or less flat leaves in moist conditions (Aiken et al. 1985).

In general, the sect. Eskia includes species with an outline that is elliptical (F. elegans; Fig. 7D), more or less obovate (F. eskia and F. burnatii; Fig. 7A1, C), sometimes slightly angular (F. × picoeuropeana; Fig. 7B), or markedly polygonal (F. gautieri; Fig. 7E1, E2), especially in those with sclerenchyma arranged in strands. In this sense, it has been shown that leaves with a more continuous sclerenchyma on the abaxial surface usually present a rounded and smooth outline, whereas those with sclerenchyma in strands have a more angular outline (Aiken and Consaul 1995). The largest leaf cross-section sizes are reached by F. eskia followed by F. × picoeuropeana and F. burnatii, while F. gautieri and F. elegans presented the smallest sizes (Table 1A). All of them have usually small-sized epidermal cells and abundant adaxial trichomes. They are glabrous on the abaxial surface, except F. elegans that is scabrous and also has a larger median vascular bundle diameter in proportion to the cross-section length (Fig. 7D, Table 1A). Section Eskia comprises species that share many anatomical features with the sect. Festuca but they are morphologically segregated from that section because they present broadly scarious lemmas and glumes and because of the shape of the ligule (Willkomm 1861; Fuente and Ortúñez 2001). The species of sect. Eskia inhabit alpine and subalpine pastures of the north of the Iberian Peninsula, being able to extend into the French Pyrenees, as well as in the mountains of the centre, northwest, and south of the Iberian Peninsula (Ortúñez and Fuente 2004; Torrecilla et al. 2013).

Anatomically, the F. × picoeuropeana hybrid shares intermediate anatomical characters with its parents, F. eskia and F. gautieri, mainly those referring to the outline, shape and number of ribs, and number of vascular bundles (Fig. 7B). Representatives from Festuca sect. Eskia were resolved as basal of the fine-leaved clade (Torrecilla et al. 2003, 2013).

Figure 7. 

Leaf cross-sections of the Festuca sect. Eskia species. A F. eskia (A1 conduplicate leaf, A2 flat leaf) B F. × picoeuropeana C F. burnatii D F. elegans E F. gautieri (E1 sclerenchyma in continuous ring, E2 in strands). Scale bars: 0.2 mm (A–E), and 0.3 mm (A2).

Leaf anatomy in the Festuca species of the broad-leaved clade

The broad-leaved taxa show two models of leaf cross-section: from narrowly flat (up to 2.4 mm wide, rarely reach 4 mm) to more generally conduplicate innovation leaf blades (up to 2.3 mm length) in the species of the sects. Subbulbosae, Scariosae and Pseudoscariosa (subgen. Festuca; Table 1A, Fig. 8); or completely flat (up to ca. 17 mm wide), with the leaves being more or less rolled up in prefoliation or under conditions of water stress (very visible especially in herbarium specimen sheets), as in the sects. Lojaconoa (subgen. Festuca; Table 1A, Fig. 9), Phaeochloa (subgen. Drymanthele; Table 1B), and sects. Schedonorus and Plantynia (subgen. Schedonorus; Table 1C).

Species of this clade present complete girders that extend from the vascular bundles to both the abaxial and the adaxial epidermis (except in F. durandoi), which can contact the abaxial face with a continuous or discontinuous ring. The girders may consist only of small sclerenchyma cells with thickened and lignified walls, sometimes interrupting the outer bundle sheath, or the outer sheath may possess girder-like extensions contacting with the sclerenchyma tissue, on both the abaxial and the adaxial faces. The density and size of the adaxial trichomes are less than in the fine-leaved fescues, particularly marked in the species with a completely flat leaf section where they may be glabrous or present small and very scattered aculei (Table 1). Noticeable in most species is the presence of large, highly developed bulliform cells in the intercostal spaces, making the leaf blade unfold (see exceptions in sects. Subbulbosae, Scariosae and Pseudoscariosa). In this great clade, 7 lineages are recognized that correspond to 7 well-defined taxonomic sections (Fig. 3), which have been distributed in three different subgenera.

Figure 8. 

Leaf cross-sections of the Festuca sects. Pseudoscariosa (A), Scariosae (B) and Subbulbosae (C–E) species. A F. pseudeskia (A1 conduplicate leaf, arrow pointing to the colourless cells; A2 flat leaf) B F. scariosa (B1 conduplicate leaf, B2 flat leaf) C F. baetica (arrow pointing to the colourless cells) D F. paniculata s.l. (D1 subsp. multispiculata, D2 subsp. fontqueri, D3 subsp. paui, D4 subsp. longiglumis) E F. durandoi. Scale bars: 0.3 mm (A–E), and 0.4 mm (D4).

Festuca sects. Scariosae and Pseudoscariosa

The sects. Scariosae (F. scariosa) and Pseudoscariosa (F. pseudeskia) have very similar anatomical patterns (Fig. 3). The leaves are more or less conduplicate, although sometimes they can have very extended blades and be almost flat, with the midrib only slightly differentiated (Fig. 8). They are characterized by the presence of adaxial and/or abaxial sclerenchyma girders (usually T-shaped on the adaxial side) in the first-order and second-order vascular bundles, associated with extensions of the bundle sheath composed of large, thin-walled, colourless cells of the same size as or larger than the outer bundle sheath cells, and girders or strands facing the third-order vascular bundles only on the abaxial face, or sometimes without sclerenchyma. The girders may finish in a sclerenchyma ring as in F. scariosa (Fig. 8B), or not as in F. pseudeskia (Fig. 8A). In cross-section, both species present deep heteromorphic furrows, rounded or sometimes truncate or slightly triangular. Bulliform cells are less developed in the conduplicate forms of these sections (Fig. 8A1, B1), sometimes unnoticeable, whereas they are far more developed in the extended or more or less flat forms (Fig. 8A2, B2). Epidermal cells are small in both species, especially those on the abaxial face in F. scariosa, most likely due to the presence of the continuous ring and a strongly cuticularized epidermis. They grow in the south and southeast of the Iberian Peninsula, and present mixed shoots and short rhizomes (Fuente and Ortúñez 2001). Given their morphological characteristics, both taxonomic sections have been included within the broad subgenus Festuca, although phylogenetic reconstructions show that they are more related to species of the sect. Phaeochloa (e.g., Torrecilla et al. 2003; Fig. 3), with which, however, they show major anatomical differences (Fig. 9, see below).

Figure 9. 

Leaf cross-sections of the Festuca sects. Lojaconoa (A–B), Schedonorus (C–E), and Phaeochloa (FG) species. A F. patula B F. coerulescens (arrow pointing to the sclerenchyma interrupting the cells of the outer median vascular bundle sheath) C F. interrupta (C1 inrolled leaf, C2 flat leaf) D F. arundinacea (arrow pointing to the bulliform cells) E F. mediterranea (E1 mature leaf, E2 inmature leaf) F F. altissima G F. lasto. Scale bars: 0.4 mm (A–E), 0.5 mm (F), and 0.6 mm (G).

Festuca sect. Subbulbosae

The anatomical model of the species of the sect. Subbulbosae hardly differs from the previous ones, except that complete girders (T-shaped and usually with colourless cells towards the adaxial epidermis) are only found in the main vascular bundles and are usually absent in the secondary vascular bundles (Fig. 8C–E). Anatomical differences have been found between species with regard to the arrangement of the sclerenchyma and the form and number of ribs (Fig. 8C–E). Some variations of F. paniculata s.l. have been found and these may correspond to different infraspecific categories (Fig. 8D1–D4). One variant is characterized by a flat section, a great number of vascular bundles, with complete girders in the first- and second-order vascular bundles, and strands in those of third-order, which never end in a ring on the abaxial face, and that could correspond with F. paniculata subsp. longiglumis (Fig. 8D4), the only subspecies of the “F. paniculata group” for which completely flat leaves have been described. More frequent is the variant characterized by having conduplicate (U- or V-shaped) leaves, whose arrangement of the abaxial sclerenchyma may be in the form of a continuous band (F. paniculata subsp. multispiculata; Fig. 8D1), an almost continuous band with the base of the girders swollen (F. baetica; Fig. 8C), or in strands which confluent with the first-order vascular bundles (F. paniculata subsp. fontqueri and F. paniculata subsp. paui; Fig. 8D2, D3, respectively). Festuca durandoi (Fig. 8E) differs from all the foregoing species in that it presents neither complete sclerenchyma girders nor adaxial girders, and it have underdeveloped strands, generally smaller leaf length and width, and lateral ribs absent or inconspicuous.

The sect. Subbulbosae was also traditionally included in the subgenus Festuca, being characterized by the presence of intravaginal innovations, leaves with swollen bases that confer a sub-bulbous appearance, and split sheaths. However, phylogenetically it is located in the same clade as the sects. Plantynia and Schedonorus with which it has evident anatomical differences (Torrecilla and Catalán 2002).

Festuca sect. Lojaconoa

The leaf model of sect. Lojaconoa (F. patula and F. coerulescens) shares many characteristics with the rest of the taxonomic sections with flat leaves (Fig. 3, Table 1B, C). Festuca patula (Fig. 9A) only presents girders in the primary and secondary vascular bundles, and has a greater number of vascular bundles. Its adaxial surface is almost smooth with the intercostal spaces defined only by the bulliform cells, and the midrib projects abaxially. Festuca coerulescens (Fig. 9B) presents complete girders in all its vascular bundles, and generally has fewer vascular bundles and ribs, the latter being truncate and with relatively pronounced intercostal spaces. In both, the sclerenchyma girders interrupt the outer first-order bundle sheath cells in the adaxial and abaxial surfaces, and are not associated with colourless cells. These may sometimes be present but only associated with lower order vascular bundles towards the adaxial face. The margins finish in two sclerenchyma strands, and never have a ring on the abaxial face. In addition, the epidermal cells are clearly visible on the abaxial face, which is glabrous or slightly aculeate. They are the only species of the subgenus Festuca with totally flat leaf blades, and are characterized morphologically by basally swollen leaf sheaths (Müller and Catalán 2006).

Festuca sect. Phaeochloa

The anatomical pattern presented by the species of this section (F. altissima and F. lasto) is quite homogeneous (Fig. 9F, G), although with variability in width, and numbers of ribs and vascular bundles. In both, the sclerenchyma forms complete girders in all the vascular bundles and interrupts the outer bundle sheath cells in the adaxial and abaxial surfaces (Table 1B). They are two of the species with the greatest leaf widths of the entire genus (F. lasto is the largest of the genus with up to 16.6 mm, rarely 20 mm), and have practically smooth adaxial surfaces since the intercostal spaces defined by the bulliform cells are weakly or not at all developed. The bulliform cells are clearly visible, as in all the species with flat leaves of this clade. Festuca lasto grows in the south of the Iberian Peninsula, while F. altissima inhabits wet zones of the north of this territory, and extends over Europe (Devesa et al. 2013). Both species are elsewhere characterized morphologically by extravaginal innovations and absence of auricles (Hackel 1882; Clayton and Renvoize 1986), and are included in the subgenus Drymanthele.

Festuca sects. Plantynia and Schedonorus

In the species of these sections, the leaves are flat, with more or less open or fully expanded hemilimbs (Table 1C, Fig. 9). Only F. interrupta may have convolute leaves more or less inrolling from one margin (Fig. 9C). No clear anatomical models associated with these taxonomic sections can be appreciated. The species of the sect. Schedonorus (F. interrupta, F. arundinacea and F. mediterranea; Fig. 9C–E) only have complete girders in the primary and secondary vascular bundles. In addition, the sclerenchyma makes contact with adaxial extensions of colourless cells in the median vascular bundle, sometimes also in the abaxial site (seen in F. arundinacea). The ribs are well defined in all of these species, from truncate to rounded in F. arundinacea (Fig. 9D) and F. interrupta, in which they are peculiarly heteromorphic in size and form (Fig. 9C), while in F. mediterranea they range from rounded to triangular (Fig. 9E). In F. gigantea (sect. Plantynia), the girders are complete in all the vascular bundles and the outer sheath is interrupted, and the ribs are rounded or truncate. Of these species, F. arundinacea and F. gigantea have the largest leaf widths (up to 12 mm and 14 mm, respectively), while F. interrupta and F. mediterranea have the smallest (up to 6.5 mm and 7.1 mm, respectively). The bulliform cells appear markedly larger and inflated, and arranged in a fan shape in the intercostal areas in all of these species. The adaxial surface may be glabrous or slightly aculeate. All these species have been integrated into the subgenus Schedonorus (Inda et al. 2014), and are characterized morphologically by having sterile extravaginal shoots with cataphylls and clasping falcate auricles.

Conclusion and final remarks

Leaf anatomy as seen in cross-section has certain limitations for the delimitation of species, although it has taxonomic value for the separation of some groups. How useful anatomical characters is closely related to the taxonomic level that one wants to discriminate. Thus, the anatomical differences between the species of the two major clades are evident, and there are many features that distinguish them. Fine-leaved fescues usually present strongly folded leaves, rarely flat, with continuous sclerenchyma or strands, but never forming complete girders nor having colourless cells associated with the girders, and with bulliform cells that are relatively unpronounced. Fescues of the broad-leaved clade may present a leaf blade from convolute to fully folded, almost always with sclerenchyma girders associated with colourless cells, and highly developed bulliform cells.

Within the fine-leaved fescues clade, the character that most discriminates the taxonomic sections, the groups of species, and the species, is the arrangement of the sclerenchyma. Its analysis in species whose phylogenetic placement puts them in different lineages than what had been expected according to traditional taxonomy affects the previously recognized anatomical models, especially for the sects. Festuca and Aulaxyper. In species of the sect. Festuca included in lineage 1 (Fig. 3) and in the sect. Eskia, the leaves generally present smooth outlines, and there predominates a continuous or continuous-interrupted arrangement of the sclerenchyma, more rarely in strands in the margins and the midrib or opposite the vascular bundles. In contrast, in species of the sect. Festuca included in lineage 3 and lineage 2 (Fig. 3), the leaves have angular outlines, and there predominates discontinuous sclerenchyma opposite the vascular bundles.

The length and width of the leaf cross-section, and the number of vascular bundles and ribs overlap in most species of this clade, although they are useful for the differentiation of some taxa within the same taxonomic section and/or lineage. Only F. henriquesii, a species traditionally placed in the sect. Festuca, has a flat or a wide V-shaped leaf, and its pattern is very different from that typical of species of lineages 1 or 3 (Fig. 3). The arrangement of the sclerenchyma into strands without forming complete girders, the presence of developed ribs, and the number of vascular bundles suggest a greater affinity with the species of the sect. Aulaxyper, in which there are species whose leaf cross-sections present extended arms (F. nevadensis and F. rothmaleri) or are flat in their cauline leaves (F. heterophylla).

Species can neither be distinguished nor grouped together by the remaining characters studied, since they overlap to a great extent (especially in the number of outer/inner bundle sheaths cells, and the number of bulliform cells), and many of the variations found (e.g., thickness of the sclerenchyma, and abundance and length of the trichomes) may be responses to environmental conditions. The size of the lumen of the epidermal cells may be useful to differentiate certain species (F. glauca, F. vasconcensis, F. brigantina subsp. actiophyta, F. iberica, and F. trichophylla), although some heterogeneity was found. Also, a major intraspecific variability was found, especially in the sclerenchyma pattern and the degree of folding of the leaf, which is particularly striking in F. eskia.

In the species of the broad-leaved clade, some anatomical features are associated with the shape of the leaf, which may be conduplicate or totally flat. The variations observed affect the size, the presence of girders, their arrangement relative to the vascular bundles, the presence of colourless cells, and the development and shape of the ribs. Thus, the species of the sects. Scariosae, Pseudoscariosa, and Subbulbosae are anatomically the most similar, but they are very different from those of the sect. Lojaconoa which has been included within the same subgenus Festuca. All except those of the sect. Lojaconoa have a leaf pattern that varies from conduplicate to more or less flat, very evident ribs, T-shaped girders, and a major overlap in the numbers of vascular bundles and ribs. The main differences between them have to do with the arrangement of the sclerenchyma with respect to the vascular bundles, and the presence of a ring that may or may not be continuous. Festuca durandoi is the species that is anatomically farthest from the rest of this group, it being the only one that has no complete sclerenchyma girders. In the remaining sections of the broad-leaved clade, the species have flat leaves and greater leaf width and numbers of vascular bundles and ribs, and some of them may be recognized by the ribs being absent or poorly developed (F. altissima, F. lasto, and F. patula) or by whether or not the sclerenchyma contacts the outer bundle sheath towards the adaxial face.

The leaf anatomy has, on the one hand, a clear practical interest from an ecological and agronomic point of view for the early recognition (e.g., vegetative stages) of many species of Festuca. From a systematic view, anatomical patterns reinforce the morphological and molecular delimitation of some taxonomic sections or groups of taxa, although some of these patterns or models may appear in different sections or be very different in closely related sections. It would be interesting to assess anatomically all genera currently included in the genus Festuca s.l. (e.g., Vulpia, Wangenheimia, Ctenopsis, Lolium and Castellia, among others), whose leaf anatomy is less known because it is not a diagnostic character in their taxonomy, with the aim of exploring the global anatomical diversity patterns in the different lineages.

Acknowledgements

We thank herbaria curators of the consulted herbaria for allowing us to examine their collections. This study was supported by a predoctoral grant to GM (BES-2012-059366) and the projects Flora iberica (CGL2008-02982-C03-03, CGL2011-28613-C03-02 and CGL2014-52787-C3-3-P) by the Spanish Ministerio Economía y Competitividad, and the European Union FEDER funds.

References

  • Aiken SG, Darbyshire SJ, Lefkovitch LP (1985) Restricted taxonomic value of leaf sections in Canadian narrow-leaved Festuca (Poaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 63: 995–1007. https://doi.org/10.1139/b85-135
  • Aiken SG, Consaul LL (1995) Leaf cross sections and phytogeography: A potent combination for identifying members of Festuca subgg. Festuca and Leucopoa (Poaceae), occurring in North America. American Journal of Botany 82: 1287–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/2446252
  • Aizpuru I, Aseginolaza C, Uribe-Echebarría PM, Urrutia P (1997) Catálogo florístico del País Vasco y territorios limítrofes. Itinera Geobotanica 10: 183–233.
  • Bolòs O, Vigo J (2001) Festuca. In Flora dels Països Catalans 4: 329–358. Barcelona.
  • Castroviejo S (1986–2017) Flora iberica. Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid.
  • Catalán P, Torrecilla P, López JA, Olmstead RG (2004) Phylogeny of the festucoid grasses of subtribe Loliinae and allies (Poaceae, Pooideae) inferred from ITS and trnL-F sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31: 517–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2003.08.025
  • Catalán P, Torrecilla P, López Rodriguez JA, Müller J (2006) Molecular evolutionary rates shed new lights on the relationships of Festuca, Lolium, Vulpia and related grasses (Loliinae, Pooideae, Poaceae). Current taxonomic research on the British & European Flora. Botanical Society of the British Isles. Conference report 25: 45–70.
  • Catalán P, Torrecilla P, López-Rodríguez JA, Müller J, Stace CA (2007) A systematic approach to subtribe Loliinae (Poaceae, Pooideae) based on phylogenetic evidence. Aliso 23: 380–405. https://doi.org/10.5642/aliso.20072301.31
  • Catalán P (2009) Festuca L. In Blanca G, Cabezudo B, Cueto M, Fernández López C, Morales Torres C (eds.) Flora Vascular de Andalucía Oriental 1: 298–310. Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía. Sevilla.
  • Cebolla Lozano C, Rivas Ponce MA (1999) Festuca indigesta Boiss. subsp. lagascae Cebolla et Rivas Ponce subsp. nova et ses relations avec le complexe Festuca indigesta Boiss. Criteres utilises lors de son etude taxonomique. Flora Mediterranea 9: 131–146.
  • Cebolla C, Rivas Ponce MA (2003a) Catálogo del género Festuca L. (Poaceae) en la Península Ibérica. Candollea 58(1): 189–213.
  • Cebolla C, Rivas Ponce MA (2003b) Contribución al conocimiento del género Festuca L. en el noreste de Cataluña (Gerona, España). Acta Botanica Barcinonensia 49: 39–50.
  • Charmet G, Ravel C, Balfourier F (1997) Phylogenetic analysis in the Festuca-Lolium complex using molecular markers and ITS rDNA. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 94: 1038–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050512
  • Clayton WD, Renvoize SA (1986) Genera Gramineum: Grasses of the World. Genera graminum. Grasses of the world. HMSO Books. London.
  • Clayton WD, Vorontsova MS, Harman KT, Williamson H (2006 onwards) GrassBase - The Online World Grass Flora. London The Board of Trustees, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. http://www.kew.org/data/grasses-db.html [accessed 10 February 2017].
  • Connor HE (1960) Variation in leaf anatomy in Festuca novae-zelandiae (Hack.) Cockayne and F. matthewsu (Hack.) Cheeseman. New Zealand Journal of Botany 3: 468–509.
  • Devesa JA, Catalán P, Müller J, Cebolla C, Ortúñez E (2013) Checklist de Festuca L. (Poaceae) en la Península Ibérica. Lagascalia 33: 183–274.
  • Ellis RP (1976) A procedure for standardizing comparative leaf anatomy in the Poaceae. I. The leaf-blade as viewed in transverse section. Bothalia 12: 65–109. https://doi.org/10.4102/abc.v12i1.1382
  • Ellis RP (1979) A procedure for standardizing comparative leaf anatomy in the Poaceae. II. The epidermis as seen in surface view. Bothalia 12: 641–671. https://doi.org/10.4102/abc.v12i4.1441
  • Ellis RP (1986) A review of comparative leaf blade anatomy in the systematics of the Poaceae: the past 25 years. In Soderstrom TR, Hilu KW, Campbell CS, Barkworth ME (eds) Grass systematics and evolution. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C., 3–10 pp.
  • Foggi B, Gherardi ME, Signorini MA, Rossi G, Bruschi P (2006) Festuca inops and Festuca gracilior (Poaceae): are they two different species?. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 151: 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2006.00496.x
  • Fuente V, Ortúñez E (1995) Festuca henriquesii Hackel y Festuca ampla Hackel en la Península Ibérica. Studia Botanica 14: 129–141.
  • Fuente V, Ortúñez E, Ferrero L (1997) Contribución al conocimiento del género Festuca L. (Poaceae) en el País Vasco y Sistema Ibérico septentrional (Península Ibérica). Itinera Geobotanica 10: 317–351.
  • Fuente V, Ortúñez E (1998) Biosistemática de la sección Festuca del género Festuca L. (Poaceae) en la Península Ibérica. EUA. Madrid, 126 pp.
  • Giełwanowska I, Szczuka E, Bednara J, Gorecki R (2005) Anatomical features and ultrastructure of Deschampsia antarctica (Poaceae) leaves from different growing habitats. Annals of Botany 96: 1109–1119. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci262
  • Hackel E (1882) Monographia Festucarum Europaerum. T. Fischer. Kassel & Berlin, 216 pp.
  • Inda LA, Segarra-Morales JG, Müller J, Peterson PM, Catalán P (2008) Dated historical biogeography of the temperate Loliinae (Poaceae, Poideae) grasses in the Northern and southern hemispheres. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 46: 932–957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2007.11.022
  • Inda LA, Sanmartín I, Buerki S, Catalán P (2014) Mediterranean origin and Miocene–Holocene Old World diversification of meadow fescues and ryegrasses (Festuca subgenus Schedonorus and Lolium). Journal of Biogeography 41: 600–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12211
  • Kerguélen M, Plonka F (1989) Les Festuca de la flore de France (Corse comprise). Bulletin de la Société Botanique du Centre-Ouest: Nouvelle Serie: Numero Special. Niort, 10.
  • Kjellqvist E (1961) Studies in Festuca rubra L., 1. Influence of environment. Botaniska Notiser 114: 403–408.
  • Kuzmanović N, Šinžar-Sekulić J, Lakušić D (2009) Leaf anatomy of the Sesleria rigida Heuffel ex Reichenb. (Poaceae) in Serbia. Botanica Serbica 33: 51–67.
  • Kuzmanović N, Šinžar-Sekulić J, Lakušić D (2012) Ecologically determined variation in leaf anatomical traits of Sesleria rigida (Poaceae) in Serbia-multivariate morphometric evidence. Folia Geobotanica 47(1): 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12224-011-9104-y
  • López J, Devesa JA (1991) Contribución al conocimiento de la anatomía foliar de las Aveneae (Poaceae, Pooideae) del centro-oeste de España. Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid 48(2): 171–187.
  • López E, Martínez-Sagarra G, Devesa JA (2016) Estudio taxonómico del complejo Festuca alpina (Poaceae, Pooideae) en la Península Ibérica. Acta Botanica Malacitana 41: 19–31.
  • Loureiro J, Kopecký D, Castro S, Santos C, Silveira P (2007) Flow cytometric and cytogenetic analices of Iberian Peninsula Festuca spp. Plant Systematics and Evolution 269(1): 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-007-0564-8
  • Markgraf-Dannenberg I (1980) Festuca L. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burgess NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA (Eds) Flora Europaea V: 125–154. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Metcalfe CR (1960) Anatomy of the Monocotyledons: Gramineae I. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  • Namaganda M, Lye KA (2008) A taxonomic comparison between tropical African and related European broad-leaved species of Festuca L. (Poaceae). South African Journal of Botany 74(2): 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2007.12.005
  • Nova PJ, Cruz M, Monte JV, Soler C (2006) Genetic relationships within and among Iberian fescues (Festuca L.) based on PCR-amplified markers. Genome 49(9): 1170–1183. https://doi.org/10.1139/g06-077
  • Olsen JT, Caudle KL, Johnson LC, Baer SG, Maricle BR (2013) Environmental and genetic variation in leaf anatomy among populations of Andropogon gerardii (Poaceae) along a precipitation gradient. American Journal of Botany 100(10): 1957–1968. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1200628
  • Ortúñez E, Fuente V (2010) Epidermal micromorphology of the genus Festuca L. (Poaceae) in the Iberian Peninsula. Plant Systematics and Evolution 284(3): 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-009-0248-7
  • Ortúñez E, Cano-Ruiz J (2013) Epidermal micromorphology of the genus Festuca L. subgenus Festuca (Poaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 299(8): 1471–1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-013-0809-7
  • Ortúñez E, Palacio C, Fuente V (1995) Festuca hystrix Boiss. y Festuca reverchonii Hackel en la Península Ibérica. Acta Botanica Malacitana 20: 51–60.
  • Pimentel M, Sahuquillo E (2003) Study of the leaf anatomy of the Iberian species of genus Anthoxanthum (Poaceae). Bocconea 16(2): 683–689.
  • Portal R (1996) Festuca du Massif Central. Guide pratique pour leur étude. Published by the author, Vals-près-le-Puy, France.
  • Ramesar-Fortner NS, Dengler NG, Aiken SG (1995) Phenotypic plasticity in leaves of four species of arctic Festuca (Poaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 73: 1810–1823. https://doi.org/10.1139/b95-192
  • Ruiz-Téllez T, Devesa JA, López J (1998) Anatomical plasticity in species of Deschampsia P. Beauv. (Poaceae) in SW Europe (Iberian Peninsula). Acta Botanica Gallica 145(4): 281–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/12538078.1998.10516308
  • Saint-Yves A (1922) Les Festuca de l’Afrique du Nord et des Iies Atlantiques. Candollea 1, 1.
  • Saint-Yves A (1930) Aperçu sur la distribution géographique des Festuca Subgen. Eu-Festuca. Candollea 4: 146–165.
  • Thiers B (2017) Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ science/ih/ [10 January 2017].
  • Torrecilla P, Catalán P (2002) Phylogeny of broad-leaved and fine-leaved Festuca lineages (Poaceae) based on nuclear ITS sequences. Systematic Botany 27: 241–251.
  • Torrecilla P, López-Rodríguez JA, Stančik D, Catalán P (2003) Systematics of Festuca L. Sects. Eskia Willk., Pseudatropis Kriv., Amphigenes (Janka) Tzvel., Pseudoscariosa Kriv. and Scariosae Hack. based on analysis of morphological characters and DNA sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 239(1): 113–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-002-0265-2
  • Torrecilla P, López-Rodríguez JA, Catalán P (2004) Phylogentetic relationships of Vulpia and related genera (Poeae, Poaceae) based on analysis of its and trnL-F sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 91: 124–158.
  • Torrecilla P, Acedo C, Marques I, Diaz-Perez AJ, Lopez-Rodriguez JA, Mirones V, Sus A, Llamas F, Alonso A, Perez-Collazos E, Viruel J, Sahuquillo Sancho MD, Komac B, Manso JA, Segarra-Moragues JG, Draper D, Villar L, Catalan P (2013) Morphometric and molecular variation in concert: taxonomy and genetics of the reticulate Pyrenean and Iberian alpine spiny fescues (Festuca eskia complex Poaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 173(4): 676–706. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12103
  • Watson L, Dallwitz MJ (1992) The grass genera of the world. CAB International, Wallingford.
  • Willkomm M (1861) Poaceae. In: Willkomm M, Lange J (Eds) Prodromus Florae Hispanicae Stuttgartiae. Vol. 1, 33–118.
  • Wrobel C, Coulman BE, Smith DL (2007) An investigation into the anatomical differences between flat and folded leaves in reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.). Canadian journal of plant science 88: 339–342. https://doi.org/10.4141/CJPS07025