Research Article
Print
Research Article
Comprehensive molecular and morphological analysis of Brachystemma calycinum and Stellaria ovatifolia in the tribe Alsineae (Caryophyllaceae)
expand article infoWen-Qiao Wang, Zhi-Wei Su§, Zhong-Hui Ma
‡ Guangxi University, Nanning, China
§ Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China
Open Access

Abstract

Over the course of the recent decade, the composition of Alsineae has been drastically changed by means of molecular phylogeny. However, the genus Brachystemma has not been sampled in any of the previous studies, and its phylogenetic position is still pending. In addition, the related species Stellaria ovatifolia, which has at times been placed in Brachystemma, Schizotechium, or Stellaria, has also not been sampled. Here, nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and four plastid regions (trnL-F, matK, rbcL, rps16) were used to conduct phylogenetic analyses within Caryophyllaceae and the tribe Alsineae. Ancestral characters (petal margin and number of seeds) were reconstructed in the tribe Alsineae based on the phylogenetic results. Our results indicate that Brachystemma is nested in the tribe Alsineae and forms a monophylum with S. ovatifolia, and apically lobed petals and numerous seeds may be the ancestral characters in the tribe Alsineae. Based on our study, Stellaria ovatifolia should be considered within Brachystemma, and Brachystemma is clearly a separate genus and now includes two species.

Keywords

Alsineae, Brachystemma, molecular phylogeny, Stellaria

Introduction

The family Caryophyllaceae has traditionally been divided into three subfamilies (Lu et al. 2001). Recently, a new classification system has been proposed based on molecular and morphological evidence in Caryophyllaceae, and eleven tribes were recognized (Harbaugh et al. 2010; Greenberg and Donoghue 2011).

The tribe Alsineae in a traditional sense contained 12 genera including Arenaria L., Brachystemma D.Don, Cerastium L., Holosteum L., Lepyrodiclis Fenzl, Minuartia Loefl., Moehringia L., Myosoton Moench, Pseudostellaria Pax, Sagina L., Stellaria L., and Thylacospermum Fenzl (Lu et al. 2001). However, molecular studies have revealed that the traditional tribe Alsineae is polyphyletic (Harbaugh et al. 2010; Greenberg and Donoghue 2011). To date, the tribe Alsineae now consists of 16 genera including five new genera (Engellaria Iamonico, Hartmaniella M.L.Zhang & Rabeler, Nubelaria M.T.Sharples & E.A.Tripp, Rabelera M.T.Sharples & E.A.Tripp, and Shivparvatia Pusalkar & D.K.Singh), three reinstated genera (Adenonema Bunge, Odontostemma Benth. ex G.Don, and Schizotechium (Fenzl) Rchb.), and eight originally accepted genera: Cerastium, Dichodon (Bartl. ex Rchb.) Rchb., Holosteum, Lepyrodiclis, Mesostemma Vved., Moenchia Ehrh., Pseudostellaria, and Stellaria (Keshav and Kumar 2015; Sadeghian et al. 2015; Pusalkar and Srivastava 2016; Zhang et al. 2017; Sharples and Tripp 2019; Iamonico 2021; Yao et al. 2021; Arabi et al. 2022). Brachystemma morphologically related to other Alsineae still lacks comprehensive molecular and morphological study.

Brachystemma ovatifolium Mizushima was first published in 1955 and is related to Brachystemma calycinum D.Don (Mizushima 1955; Fig. 1 in present paper). Subsequently, Mizushima transferred it to Stellaria as Stellaria ovatifolia (Mizushima) Mizushima due to its two-lobed petals and similar seed morphology (Mizushima 1966), which was also accepted by Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae (Wu and Ke 1996) and Flora of China (Shilong and Rabeler 2001). In the first book, it was incorporated into sect. Schizothecium Fenzl of Stellaria, together with S. delavayi Franch. and S. monosperma Buch.-Ham. ex D.Don (Wu and Ke 1996). Recently, Stellaria sect. Schizotechium has been raised into a separate genus, Schizotechium (Pusalkar and Srivastava 2016), and the new combination Schizotechium monospermum (Buch.-Ham. ex D.Don) Pusalkar & S.K.Srivast. was proposed based on morphological studies (Pusalkar and Srivastava 2016). The molecular studies also indicated that Stellaria monosperma was far from the core Stellaria and nested within Schizotechium (Greenberg and Donoghue 2011; Sharples and Tripp 2019; Arabi et al. 2022). Although Stellaria ovatifolia was hypothesized to be part of Schizotechium (Pusalkar and Srivastava 2016), it has never been sampled and has at times been placed in Brachystemma, Schizotechium, or Stellaria, and its phylogenetic position is still pending.

Figure 1. 

Morphological comparisons between Stellaria ovatifolia (A–E) and Brachystemma calycinum (F–K) A, F habit B, G inflorescence C, H, I flower (H the flower of Brachystemma calycinum 3) D, J sepal E, K leaf.

In this study, we conducted a combined molecular and morphological analysis in order to (1) confirm the phylogenetic position of Brachystemma; (2) clarify the relationship of Stellaria ovatifolia among Stellaria, Schizotechium, and Brachystemma; (3) estimate the character evolution of seed number and petal margin in the tribe Alsineae.

Methods

Taxon sampling and DNA sequencing

The samples of Brachystemma calycinum and Stellaria ovatifolia were collected from silica-dried leaves tissue, and the vouchers were deposited in the herbarium of the College of Agriculture, Guangxi University (GAUA) and the detailed information is shown in Suppl. material 1. The total DNA of the samples were extracted by the CTAB protocol (Maddison and Maddison 2014). The PCR amplification of ITS [5F (White et al. 1990), 4R (White et al. 1990)], matK [390F (Smissen et al. 2002), 1440R (Smissen et al. 2002)], rbcL [1F (Kress and Erickson 2007), 724R (Kress and Erickson 2007)], rps16 [F (Popp and Oxelman 2001), R (Popp and Oxelman 2001)], trnL-F [C (Taberlet et al. 1991), F (Taberlet et al. 1991)] were performed as above cited. The sequencing of PCR products was performed by the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI). Newly generated sequences are available in GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), and their accession numbers (in bold) and the sequences of Caryophyllaceae members downloaded from GenBank are listed in Table 1. The absent sequences were coded as missing data.

Table 1.

List of sampled taxa and their GenBank accession numbers of sequences. The arrangement of sequences in the table shows sequences used to generate the trees shown in Fig. 3A, B. Sequences in bold were generated in this study.

Taxon GenBank accession numbers
nrITS trnL-F matK rps16 rcbL
A. Sequences used to generate Caryophyllaceae tree (Fig. 3A)
Agrostemma githago L. JN589107 EU221639 FJ589503 Z83154 KM360618
Arenaria lanuginosa (Michx.) Rohrb. MZ388084 FJ404968 MH037652 FJ404891 MH028838
Brachystemma calycinum D.Don OP594537 OP595543 OP595548 OP595553 OP595558
Cerastium pusillum Ser. JN589112 JN589683 JN589226 - -
Corrigiola andina Planch. & Triana JN589136 JN589707 JN589253 - -
Dianthus armeria L. GU440780 FJ404980 KP210382 FJ404903 MG249427
Dianthus caryophyllus L. JN589053 MT312520 KU722867 KU904222 M77699
Eremogone bryophylla (Fernald) Pusalkar & D.K.Singh MK341317 MK341206 MK341382 MK341262 -
Eremogone gypsophiloides Fenzl KP148920 - - KP149022 -
Gymnocarpos przewalskii Bunge ex Maxim. AJ310971 - - MH917997 -
Gypsophila paniculata L. KX183986 KX183948 KX183906 FJ404908 MG547371
Holosteum marginatum C.A.Mey. JN589093 JN589732 JN589261 - -
Lepyrodiclis holosteoides (C.A.Mey.) Fenzl ex Fisch. & C.A.Mey. MH808296 FJ404989 FJ404840 KP149043 JQ933385
Lychnis wilfordii (Regel) Maxim. KX757649 - - LC423834 -
Moehringia lateriflora (L.) Fenzl JX274536 FJ405000 MK520325 FJ404924 MN623790
Moehringia macrophylla (Hook.) Fenzl MF964022 FJ405001 KY952464 FJ404925 MF963280
Polycarpon tetraphyllum (L.) L. HE586018 FJ405009 MF963465 FJ404932 HM850271
Sabulina douglasii (Fenzl ex Torr. & A.Gray) Dillenb. & Kadereit KF737459 FJ404992 FJ404842 FJ460221 -
Sagina japonica (Sw.) Ohwi LC634109 - MK435791 - MN204811
Schiedea globosa H.Mann AY517663 FJ405014 DQ907804 FJ404938 DQ907750
Schizotechium jamesianum (Torr.) Arabi, Rabeler & Zarre KX158306 FJ405010 KX158343 KX158417 KX158380
Silene aprica Turcz. ex Fisch. & C.A.Mey. KX757336 FN821322 MH658952 LC423907 KX158399
Spergula arvensis L. JX274532 KY616142 JN894908 KY513576 KM360994
Stellaria ovatifolia (Mizushima) Mizushima OP594536 OP595542 OP595547 OP595552 OP595557
Stellaria vestita Kurz MH117776 EU785988 MH116882 - MH116433
Outgroup
Celosia argentea L. KY968928 LT993045 MH767769 FJ404898 AF206747
B. Sequences used to generate Alsineae tree (Fig. 3B)
Brachystemma calycinum D.Don 1 OP594537 OP595543 OP595548 OP595553 OP595558
Brachystemma calycinum D.Don 2 OP594538 OP595544 OP595549 OP595554 OP595559
Brachystemma calycinum D.Don 3 OP594539 OP595545 OP595550 OP595555 OP595560
Cerastium arvense L. MH219805 FJ404976 AY936295 MH243535 JX848446
Cerastium brachypetalum Pers. - - - - KF997372
Cerastium davuricum Fisch. ex Spreng. KX158321 - KX158358 KX158432 KX158395
Cerastium dichotomum subsp. inflatum (Link) Cullen KX158322 - KX158359 KX158433 KX158396
Cerastium dinaricum Beck & Szyszył. KJ716515 KJ716526 - - -
Cerastium fontanum Baumg. GU444015 FJ404977 KX821263 FJ404899 KF602216
Cerastium furcatum Cham. & Schltdl. MH117479 - MH116578 - MH116103
Cerastium latifolium L. - AY521301, AY521348 - - KF602212
Cerastium pusillum Ser. JN589112 JN589683 JN589226 - -
Cerastium subtriflorum Dalla Torre & Sarnth. MH537035 KJ716527 - - -
Cerastium szechuense F.N.Williams JN589116 JN589674 - - -
Cerastium tomentosum L. JN589031 AY521310, AY521357 JN589244 MH243538 KF997321
Dichodon cerastoides (L.) Rchb. MH219812 AY521340, AY521388 - MH243542 MG249356
Dichodon dubium (Bastard) Ikonn. MH219815 AY521341, AY521389 - MH243544 -
Hartmaniella oxyphylla (B.L.Rob.) M.L.Zhang KX158311 - KX158348 KX158422 KX158385
Hartmaniella sierra (Rabeler & R.L.Hartm.) M.L.Zhang KX158314 - KX158351 KX158425 KX158388
Holosteum marginatum C.A.Mey. JN589093 JN589732 JN589261 - -
Holosteum umbellatum L. JN589051 JN589655 MK520188 FJ404909 MK525977
Lepyrodiclis holosteoides (C.A.Mey.) Fenzl ex Fisch. & C.A.Mey. MH808296 FJ404989 FJ404840 KP149043 JQ933385
Mesostemma dichotomum (L.) Arabi, Rabeler & Zarre MT624581 - - MT624662 -
Mesostemma kotschyanum (Fenzl ex Boiss.) Vved. MT624582 - - MT624664 -
Mesostemma perfoliatum (Rech.f.) Rech.f. MT624583 - - MT624665 -
Mesostemma platyphyllum Rech.f. MT624584 - - MT624666 -
Moenchia erecta (L.) G.Gaertn., B. Mey. & Scherb. JN589103 FJ405002 JN895271 FJ404926 JN892479
Odontostemma barbatum (Franch.) Sadeghian & Zarre KP148852 - - - -
Odontostemma trichophorum (Franch.) Sadeghian & Zarre AY936243 - - - -
Pseudostellaria heterophylla (Miq.) Pax KX158334 EU785992 KX158371 KX158445 KX158408
Pseudostellaria japonica (Korsh.) Pax KX158307 - KX158344 KX158418 KX158381
Pseudostellaria maximowicziana (Franch. & Sav.) Pax KX158309 - KX158346 KX158420 KX158383
Pseudostellaria tianmushanensis G.H.Xia & G.Y.Li KX158318 - KX158355 KX158429 KX158392
Pseudostellaria tibetica Ohwi KX158317 - KX158354 KX158428 KX158391
Rabelera holostea (L.) M.T.Sharples & E.A.Tripp KX183997 JN589664 KX183916 MH243549 FJ395575
Schizotechium americanum (Standl.) Arabi, Rabeler & Zarre KX158335 JN589675 KX158372 KX158446 KX158409
Schizotechium jamesianum (Torr.) Arabi, Rabeler & Zarre 1 KX158306 FJ405010 KX158343 KX158417 KX158380
Schizotechium jamesianum (Torr.) Arabi, Rabeler & Zarre 2 JN589048 - - KX158417 -
Schizotechium monospermum (Buch.-Ham. ex D.Don) Pusalkar & S.K.Srivast 1 MT624596 - - MT624676 -
Schizotechium monospermum (Buch.-Ham. ex D.Don) Pusalkar & S.K.Srivast 2 MT624595 - - MT624675 -
Schizotechium turkestanicum (Schischk.) Arabi, Rabeler & Zarre MT624597 - - MT624677 -
Shivparvatia ciliolata (Edgew. & Hook.f.) Pusalkar & D.K.Singh KP148859 - - - -
Shivparvatia glanduligera (Edgew.) Pusalkar & D.K.Singh KP148867 - - - -
Shivparvatia stracheyi (Edgew.) Pusalkar & D.K.Singh KP148898 - - - -
Stellaria alsine Grimm AY438312 EU785987 HM850778 - HM850385
Stellaria aquatica (L.) Scop. AY594303 FJ405004 JN894058 MH243547 KM360890
Stellaria borealis Bigelow JN589064 JN589713 JN589285 - MG247728
Stellaria chinensis Regel JN589133 EU785990 JN589241 - -
Stellaria corei Shinners JN589046 JN589715 JN589300 - -
Stellaria crassifolia Ehrh. JN589071 JN589701 KC475924 - KC484145
Stellaria cuspidata Willd. ex D.F.K.Schltdl. JN589099 JN589641 JN589268 FJ404952 -
Stellaria graminea L. AY594304 JN589687 MK520714 MH243548 KM360998
Stellaria longifolia Muhl. ex Willd. JN589146 GQ245567 MK520715 - JX848448
Stellaria longipes Goldie JN589086 JN589672 KC475949 - JX848449
Stellaria media (L.) Vill. MK044722 EU785989 HM850779 Z83152 AF206823
Stellaria nemorum L. AY936246 HM590349 AY936298 - JN893484
Stellaria ovatifolia (Mizushima) Mizushima 1 OP594536 OP595542 OP595547 OP595552 OP595557
Stellaria ovatifolia (Mizushima) Mizushima 2 OP594540 OP595546 OP595551 OP595556 OP595561
Stellaria palustris Ehrh. ex Hoffm. JN589080 - MK520716 KX158438 KX158401
Stellaria pubera Michx. JN589127 FJ405027 FJ404878 - KP643834
Stellaria soongorica Roshev. KX158328 - MF158660 KX158439 KX158402
Stellaria umbellata Turcz. JN589109 JN589737 JN589254 - MG246195
Stellaria vestita Kurz MH117776 EU785988 MH116882 - MH116433
Outgroup
Arenaria serpyllifolia L. KX158320 FJ404972 KX158357 KX158431 KX158394
Arenaria lanuginosa (Michx.) Rohrb. MZ388084 FJ404968 MH037652 FJ404891 MH028838
Moehringia macrophylla (Hook.) Fenzl MF964022 FJ405001 KY952464 FJ404925 MF963280
Sabulina douglasii (Fenzl ex Torr. & A.Gray) Dillenb. & Kadereit KF737459 FJ404992 FJ404842 FJ460221 -
Sagina japonica (Sw.) Ohwi LC634109 - MK435791 - MN204811

Phylogenetic analyses

Sequences alignment were performed with MAFFT v.7.313 (Katoh and Standley 2013). Phylogenetic analyses were conducted separately on the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and plastid regions (matK, rbcL, trnL-F, and rps16) and then combined; no notable incongruence was found (Fig. 2). The Bayesian Inference (BI) trees were constructed using MRBAYES 3.2.6 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003), and the maximum likelihood (ML) trees were constructed by RAXML-HPC2 (Stamatakis 2006). ML trees were constructed on CIPRES Science Gateway (Miller et al. 2010) under the GTRGAMMA model with 1,000 bootstrap replicates and default values for the remaining parameters. In Bayesian inference analysis, PARTITIONFINDER v.2.1.1 (Lanfear et al. 2016) was applied to selected models of nucleotide substitution under the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Selected models consisted of SYM+I+G for ITS, GTR+G for matK, trnL-F, and rps16, HKY+I+G for rbcL. Each Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis was run for 2,000,000 generations with the tree sampled every 100 generations. The first 25% trees of each run as burn-in were discarded.

Figure 2. 

Phylogenetic relationships among the tribe Alsineae A ITS data B trnL-F, matK, rbcL, rps16 combined data. The numbers on the nodes are Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP > 0.5), maximum likelihood bootstrap percentages (BS > 50%), respectively. “*” indicates that the node is PP = 1.00/BS = 100%, “-” indicates that the node PP < 0.5/ BS < 50%.

Ancestral characters

Two morphological characters (petal margin and number of seeds) which were diagnostic characters in Brachystemma were selected to reconstruct the ancestral characters in the tribe Alsineae. MESQUITE v.3.6 (Maddison and Maddison 2014) was used to reconstruct the ancestral characters with default parameters, using the ML tree from the combined tree. Morphological characters were coded as the following: (a) the petals are entire or emarginate (coded as 0), apex lobed (less than 1/2 the length of the petals) (1), deeply lobed (longer than 1/2 the length of the petals) (2); (b) the number of seeds in a capsule is 1–3 (0), 4–6 (1), more than 6 (2) (Lu et al. 2001; Arabi et al. 2022).

Results

Phylogenetic analyses

In the Caryophyllaceae tree, Brachystemma calycinum and Stellaria ovatifolia were nested in the tribe Alsineae with strong support (PP = 1.00, BS = 100) (Fig. 3A). Moreover, in the tree encompassing Alsineae tribe, B. calycinum and S. ovatifolia formed a monophylum (PP = 1.00, BS = 99) with strong support (PP = 1.00, BS = 100) (Fig. 3B), which is sister to the clade composed of Schizotechium, Mesostemma, Lepyrodiclis, Shivparvatia, Odontostemma, and Pseudostellaria in this tree (Fig. 3B). Our results suggested Stellaria ovatifolia was closely related to Brachystemma, instead of either Stellaria s.str. or Schizotechium.

Figure 3. 

Phylogenetic relationships among the Caryophyllaceae (A) and the tribe Alsineae (B). Phylogenetic trees were conducted by ITS, trnL-F, matK, rbcL, rps16 combined sequences. The numbers on the nodes are Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP > 0.5), maximum likelihood bootstrap percentages (BS > 50%), respectively. “*” indicates that the node is PP = 1.00/BS = 100%, “-” indicates that the node PP < 0.5/ BS<50%.

Ancestral character

The results of the ancestral character reconstruction indicated that petals with a lobed apex and numerous seeds may be the ancestral characters of the tribe Alsineae (Fig. 4). The presence of entire petals and 1–3 seeds became the diagnostic characters between Brachystemma and related genera. In addition, B. calycinum and S. ovatifolia shared the characters of 1–3 seeds and neither taxa has deeply bifid petals. It suggested a close relationship between B. calycinum and S. ovatifolia.

Discussion

Phylogenetic position and distinction of Brachystemma

As currently defined, Brachystemma is a monotypic genus in the tribe Alsineae, which is characterized by annual subscandent life form, lax thyrse with many flowers, petals shorter than 1/2 the length of the sepals with entire margins, two styles, four-valved capsules, and one mature seed (Fig. 1) (Lu and Gilbert 2001). Our phylogenetic results also revealed that Brachystemma formed a single branch with S. ovatifolia (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3) and demonstrated that Brachystemma is an independent genus (S. ovatifolia will be discussed in the following paragraphs), which is consistent with traditional morphological studies (Fenzl 1840; Bentham and Hooker 1862; Pax and Hoffmann 1934; Bittrich 1993; Lu and Gilbert 2001; Takhtajan 2009). Furthermore, the phylogenetic position of Brachystemma was nested in the tribe Alsineae and sister to the clade composed of Schizotechium, Mesostemma, Lepyrodiclis, Shivparvatia, Odontostemma, and Pseudostellaria (Fig. 3). Nevertheless, Brachystemma can be morphologically distinguished from the related genera of this clade. Brachystemma and Lepyrodiclis share characters such as annual life form, lax thyrse, and two styles, but Brachystemma differs from the latter by subscandent life form and four-valved capsules (Lu et al. 2001). It also can be distinguished from Mesostemma, Pseudostellaria, and Schizotechium by annual life form, petals with entire margins, lax thyrse, and two styles (Lu et al. 2001; Arabi et al. 2022). It can be clearly distinguished from Shivparvatia by annual habit, lax thyrse, and two styles (Lu et al. 2001; Keshav and Kumar 2015). Finally, it can be segregated from Odontostemma by lax thyrse, petals with entire margin and wingless seeds (Lu et al. 2001; Sadeghian et al. 2015).

Character evolution

Our results indicated that petals with a lobed apex and numerous seeds may be the ancestral characters of the tribe Alsineae, which was consistent with previous studies (Greenberg and Donoghue 2011; Zhang et al. 2017). Brachystemma has entire petal margins, but it is sister to the clade composed of genera having lobed petals Schizotechium, Mesostemma, Odontostemma, and Pseudostellaria (except Pseudostellaria maximowicziana and Pseudostellaria tibetica) (Fig. 4). Moreover, the tribe Alsineae is defined by a many-seeded (rarely few- or one-seeded) capsule or a rarely indehiscent nutlet (Harbaugh et al. 2010; Greenberg and Donoghue 2011; Arabi et al. 2022), but above genera having lobed petals share the character of fewer seeds (a capsule) (Fig. 4). The tribe Alsineae may have developed in an evolutionary direction toward fewer seeds. In addition, B. calycinum may be a species with diverse petals based on our field observations. B. calycinum may also include long (longer than sepals) and apically lobed petals (Fig. 1H), instead of only short (shorter than 1/2 the sepal length) and entire petals in the protologue (Fig. 1I). While additional observations in the field and specimens are required to confirm the petal condition, the petal condition in Brachystemma is coded here in accordance with the protologue.

Figure 4. 

Evolutionary cladograms of the distribution of two character in Alsineae A petal margin B number of seeds.

Classification of Stellaria ovatifolia

Although the placement of Stellaria ovatifolia among Brachystemma, Schizotechium and Stellaria has been uncertain for a long time, S. ovatifolia was considered more similar to B. calycinum in general appearance (Mizushima 1955; Wu and Ke 1996). It was clearly distinguished from the core Stellaria by subscandent life form (vs. non-scandent), lax thyrse (vs. cymes, rarely solitary), two styles (vs. three, rarely four or five), two-lobed (nearly to half of petal length) petals (vs. deeply-bifid petals), four-valved capsules (vs. six-valved capsules), and one mature seed (vs. many mature seeds) (Wu and Ke 1996; Lu and Gilbert 2001; Shilong and Rabeler 2001; Sharples and Tripp 2019). Despite being hypothesized to belong to Schizotechium (Pusalkar and Srivastava 2016), S. ovatifolia shows noticeable differences with Schizotechium, including a lax thyrse (vs. many-flowered compound cymes), two styles (vs. three styles), four-valved capsules (vs. six-valved capsules), and one mature seed (vs. one or two mature seeds) (Wu and Ke 1996; Shilong and Rabeler 2001; Pusalkar and Srivastava 2016). What is more, S. ovatifolia differs from Brachystemma by having two-lobed petals (nearly to half of petal length) and Stellaria type seeds, but they both share the following characters: subscandent life form, lax thyrse, two styles, four-valved capsules, and one mature seed (Fig. 1) (Wu and Ke 1996; Lu and Gilbert 2001; Shilong and Rabeler 2001). Hence, S. ovatifolia is highly similar to Brachystemma, instead of either Stellaria or Schizotechium. In terms of our molecular phylogeny, Stellaria ovatifolia is nested with Brachystemma calycinum in a clade with strong support (PP = 1.00, BS = 100) and not closely related to either Stellaria or Schizotechium in the nrDNA tree, cpDNA tree, and combined tree (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3). We believe that S. ovatifolia should be reclassified as a species of Brachystemma combining the evidence of similar general appearance and close phylogenetic relationship. As a result, the scientific name Brachystemma ovatifolium Mizushima is reinstated here. The main characters of Brachystemma now are: herbs annual or perennial; stems subscandent, branched; leaves opposite, petiolate; leaf ovate-lanceolate to lanceolate; stipules absent; inflorescence a thyrse or numerous in dichotomous, nearly subglobose cymes, terminal or axillary; flowers numerous, 5-merous, pedicellate; sepals free, subscarious, persisting in fruit; petals lanceolate or minute, much shorter than sepals, margin entire or bifid; stamens 5 or 10; styles 2; fruit a capsule, oblate, 4-valved, 1-seeded; seed reniform or globose.

Taxonomic treatment

Brachystemma D.Don, Prodr. Fl. Nepal. 216. 1825.

Type:

B. calycinum D.Don.

Two species

B. calycinum D.Don, Prodr. Fl. Nepal. 216. 1825, and B. ovatifolium Mizushima, Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 16: 42. 1955.

Conclusion

Based on our study, Brachystemma is clearly a separate genus nested in the tribe Alsineae and now includes two Asiatic species B. calycinum and B. ovatifolium. The native range of B. calycinum is Assam (India), Cambodia, South-West (Tibet, Xizang province) and South-Central China, East Himalaya, Laos, Myanmar, Nepal, Thailand, Vietnam (Wu and Ke 1996; Lu and Gilbert 2001; Shilong and Rabeler 2001). The native range of B. ovatifolium is Nepal and China (Tibet) (Wu and Ke 1996; Lu and Gilbert 2001; Shilong and Rabeler 2001).

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Xinxin Zhu (Xinyang Normal University) for providing field images and samples of S. ovatifolia, and Zhi Xie for providing the samples of B. calycinum. This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31760045, 31970220, and 32260047), Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province (Grant No. 2018GXNSFAA281132) and the Scientific Research Fund of Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine (Grant No. 2018MS011).

References

  • Arabi Z, Ghahremaninejad F, Rabeler RK, Sokolova I, Weigend M, Zarre S (2022) Intergeneric relationships within the tribe Alsineae (Caryophyllaceae) as inferred from nrDNA ITS and cpDNA rps16 sequences: A step toward a phylogenetically based generic system. Taxon 71(3): 608–629. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12688
  • Harbaugh DT, Nepokroeff M, Rabeler RK, McNeill J, Zimmer EA, Wagner WL (2010) A new lineage–based tribal classification of the family Caryophyllaceae. International Journal of Plant Sciences 171(2): 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1086/648993
  • Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(4): 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
  • Keshav P, Kumar D (2015) Taxonomic rearrangement of Arenaria (Caryophyllaceae) in Indian western Himalaya. Shokubutsu Kenkyu Zasshi 90: 77–97.
  • Lanfear R, Frandsen PB, Wright AM, Senfeld T, Calcott B (2016) PartitionFinder 2: New methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 772–773: msw260. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw260
  • Lu DQ, Gilbert MG (2001) Brachystemma. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, Deyuan H (Eds) Flora of China, vol. 6. Science Press & Missouri Botanical Garden Press, Beijing & St. Louis, 66.
  • Lu DQ, Wu ZY, Zhou LH, Chen SL, Gilbert MG, Lidén M, McNeill J, Morton JK, Oxelman B, Rabeler RK, Thulin M, Turland NJ, Wagner WL (2001) Caryophyllaceae. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, Deyuan H (Eds) Flora of China, vol. 6. Science Press & Missouri Botanical Garden Press, Beijing & St. Louis, 1–113.
  • Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), New Orleans, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129
  • Mizushima M (1955) A new species from Nepal, collected by S. Nakao in 1953. Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica 16: 42–43.
  • Mizushima M (1966) Novelties in the Himalayan Cucurbitaceae and Caryophyllaceae. Shokubutsu Kenkyu Zasshi 41: 259–260.
  • Pax F, Hoffmann K (1934) Caryophyllaceae. In: Engler A, Harms H (Eds) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 16. Engelmann, Leipzig, 275–364.
  • Popp M, Oxelman B (2001) Inferring the history of the polyploid Silene aegaea (Caryophyllaceae) using plastid and homoeologous nuclear DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 20(3): 474–481. https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.2001.0977
  • Sadeghian S, Zarre S, Rabeler RK, Heubl G (2015) Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Arenaria (Caryophyllaceae: Tribe Arenarieae) and its allies inferred from nuclear DNA internal transcribed spacer and plastid DNA rps16 sequences. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 178(4): 648–649. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12293
  • Sharples MT, Tripp EA (2019) Phylogenetic relationships within and delimitation of the cosmopolitan flowering plant genus Stellaria L. (Caryophyllaceae): Core stars and fallen stars. Systematic Botany 44(4): 857–876. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364419X15710776741440
  • Shilong C, Rabeler RK (2001) Stellaria. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, Deyuan H (Eds) Flora of China, vol. 6. Science Press & Missouri Botanical Garden Press, Beijing & St. Louis, 11–29.
  • Smissen RD, Clement JC, Garnock-Jones PJ, Chambers GK (2002) Subfamilial relationships within Caryophyllaceae as inferred from 5′ ndhF sequences. American Journal of Botany 89(8): 1336–1341. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.89.8.1336
  • Taberlet P, Gielly L, Pautou G, Bouvet J (1991) Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17(5): 1105–1109. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037152
  • Wu Z, Ke P (1996) Stellaria. In: Tang CL, Ke P, Lu DQ, Zhou LH, Wu ZY (Eds) Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, vol. 26. Science Press, Beijing, 93–158.
  • Yao G, Xue B, Liu K, Li Y, Huang J, Zhai J (2021) Phylogenetic estimation and morphological evolution of Alsineae (Caryophyllaceae) shed new insight into the taxonomic status of the genus Pseudocerastium. Plant Diversity 43(4): 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2020.11.001
  • Zhang ML, Zeng XQ, Li C, Sanderson SC, Byalt VV, Lei Y (2017) Molecular phylogenetic analysis and character evolution in Pseudostellaria (Caryophyllaceae) and description of a new genus, Hartmaniella, in North America. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 184(4): 444–456. https://doi.org/10.1093/botlinnean/box036

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 

The vouchers detaled information

Wen-Qiao Wang, Zhong-Hui Ma

Data type: table (excel file)

Explanation note: The vouchers detaled information[DS/OL]. Science Data Bank, 2022[2023-02-02].

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (10.84 kb)
login to comment