Research Article
Print
Research Article
A new species of Encelia (Compositae, Heliantheae, Enceliinae) from the southern Baja California Peninsula
expand article infoJose Luis Leon-De La Luz, Isaac H. Lichter-Marck§|
‡ Programa de Protección Ambiental y Cambio Global, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas de Noreste, La Paz, Mexico
§ University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, United States of America
| University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States of America
Open Access

Abstract

Here, we describe and illustrate Encelia balandra sp. nov., a new species of Compositae from the Baja California Peninsula. It is rare and known only from the rocky hills around Puerto Balandra and Pichilingüe, inside the bay of La Paz, in the State of Baja California Sur, Mexico. We determine that this new species has affinities with Encelia, based on its suffruticose woody habit, neuter ray florets and compressed disc cypselae with a cleft apex. The taxonomic placement within Encelia is supported by nuclear ribosomal sequence data from two regions, ITS and ETS. We also present detailed photographs, a conservation assessment and a dichotomous key to the Encelia of the southern Baja California Peninsula. Finally, we discuss the uniqueness of Encelia balandra amongst peninsular Encelia and its potential significance for understanding the enigmatic biogeography of this ecologically important genus.

Resumen

Se ilustra y describe a una nueva especie de Asteraceae, Encelia balandra. Se conoce solo de las laderas rocosas de los cerros próximos a puerto Balandra y Pichilingue, dentro de la bahía de La Paz, en Baja California Sur, México. Encontramos que esta nueva especie tiene ciertas semejanzas con otras de Encelia por su hábito semi-arbustivo, las flores radiales neutras y cipselas comprimidas con ápice hendido. Confirmamos tal condición con datos de secuencia para las regiones ITS y ETS del genoma. También presentamos fotografías detalladas, un evaluación de conservación, y un clave dichotomus para los Encelia de Baja California sur. Se discute la semejanza con las especies peninsulares más cercanas de Encelia, se presenta una clave dicotómica para los taxones australes de la península de Baja California, y finalmente se muestran imágenes detalladas de esta nueva especie.

Keywords

Asteraceae, Cape region, DNA barcoding, narrow endemism, synantherology, taxonomy

Palabras clave

Asteraceae, Código de barras ADN, Micro-endemismo, Región de Los Cabos, Sinanterología, Taxonomía

Introduction

Encelia Adans is a genus of New World sunflowers nested within tribe Heliantheae, sensu Panero and Funk (2002), based on the presence of paleae, agamous ray florets and obcompressed cypselae with flattened margins. The genus includes shrubs, suffrutescent perennials and few herbaceous perennials that are a dominant and ecologically important element in arid environments in the southwest U.S. and northwest Mexico, as well as western South America. The genus was most recently treated by Clark (1998) who cited 17 species and seven subspecies within two subclades, the Californica and Frutescens groups. These subgeneric groups were supported with molecular phylogenetic data by Fehlberg and Ranker (2007), who included all 20 minimum-rank taxa of Encelia in their study of subtribe Enceliinae Panero, encompassing the additional genera, Enceliopsis (A. Gray) A. Nelson, Flourensia DC. and Geraea Torr. & A. Gray. Recently, a phylogeny, based on next generation sequencing (RADseq) data by Singhal et al. (2021), has resolved species level relationships within Encelia and provided support for the Californica and Frutescens groups with the exceptions of two narrow endemics in the Baja California Peninsula, E. densifolia C. Clark & Kyhos and E. ravenii Wiggins, which form a previously undetected early-diverging clade.

The Baja California Peninsula harbours the majority of species diversity in Encelia, with nine taxa that fully, or partially, overlap in geographical distribution. The two major subclades proposed by Clark (1998), the Californica and Frutescens groups, contain five and four taxa on the Peninsula, respectively. According to Rebman et al. (2016) and distribution maps in Clark (2000), three taxa of Encelia are found in the Cape region of Baja California Sur: E. farinosa A. Gray ex Torrey var. radians Brandegee ex S.F. Blake (362: 1913), E. farinosa A. Gray ex Torrey var. phenicodonta (S.F. Blake) I.M. Johnston (1198: 1924) and E. palmeri Vasey & Rose (535: 1889). E. farinosa var. radians is found in the lowlands of the eastern Cape region, while E. farinosa var. phenicodonta and E. palmeri reach their southernmost extent in the Cape region, but are more common in desert habitats in the northern peninsula. An additional taxon, E. conspersa Benth. (26: 1844) is an endemic of Magdalena Bay, close to the Cape region.

The Balandra/Pichilingue area is an important recreation destination for residents and visitors of the City of La Paz, in the State of Baja California Sur (BCS), Mexico. A relatively small area of 2,512 hectares were decreed in 2012 as a combined marine and terrestrial area, or Zona de Protección de Flora y Fauna (ZPFF) by the Comisión Nacional de Areas Naturales Protegidas (CONANP) of Mexico. The area encompasses a coastal wetland, composed mainly of intertidal habitats, sand dunes, mangroves and xeric shrubland on the slopes of low mountains and hills. In September 2014, the first author was asked to make a floristic checklist of the ca. 1,000 hectares of terrestrial surface in the Balandra/Pichilingue area as part of an integrated management plan for the protected area. One plant observed during this survey was an uncommon suffrutescent, low perennial herb, in vegetative stage, with characteristics of the Heliantheae alliance of the sunflower family (Compositae). Based on limited sampling of mostly vegetative material, we were able to discern basic characters, such as solitary, terminal capitula on long, scape-like peduncles and receptacular bracts, which led the plant to be determined as Heliopsis Pers. in the checklist, following the taxonomic key in Wiggins (1980).

Heavy rainfall in the early winter of 2019–2020 brought favourable conditions to the Balandra/ Pichilingue area, allowing us to collect suitable material, photograph the plant in flower and fruit and determine the genus of the plant with confidence using dichotomous keys (Shreve and Wiggins 1964; Wiggins 1980) and, later, to sequence DNA from two regions of the nuclear ribosomal cistron, the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) and External Transcribed Spacer (ETS). This approach allowed us to present both morphological and molecular phylogenetic evidence that this new plant is a previously undescribed member of the genus Encelia, which we describe and illustrate here.

Materials and methods

Study site

Biogeographically, the Balandra or Pichilingue Hills constitute a disjunct fragment of the Sonoran Desert Province (sensu Shreve and Wiggins 1964) that falls within the Central Gulf Coast sub-province (Rebman et al. 2016). This region forms a long strip of lowlands along the east coast of most of the Baja California Peninsula, under the environmental influence of the Gulf of California. The Balandra/Pichilingue Hills form the southern point of the great Bay of La Paz. Geologically, the rocks are part of the complex Comondú Formation (Aranda-Gómez and Pérez-Venzor 1988), whose orogenesis occurred during the early Miocene age, these volcanic mountains representing the backbone of the Baja California Peninsula (see Fig. 1 for the location of the study area, including the distributional range of Encelia spp. in BCS).

Figure 1. 

Range map of Encelia balandra. Geographical location of the study site in Baja California Sur (BCS), Mexico illustrating the Balandra/Pichilingüe Protected Area with a dashed polygon. The dark-grey area marks the zone where 17 plants were located and collected. The light-grey tone shows mountainous terrain. Numbers (1–5) show the distribution of the southern Encelia taxa in Baja California Sur, Mexico.

Field collection

The exceptional rainy season of winter 2019–2020 made it possible to locate additional individuals of the focal plant in the Balandra Hills. Three populations were located, separated by approximately 800 m, at el Tecolote Beach, the hills of Rancho San Lorenzo and Balandra Beach. Reviewing the collections of undetermined Compositae at HCIB Herbarium (abbreviations following Thiers 2020) revealed two additional exemplars of this same plant previously collected within the Balandra Protected Area in 1994 and 1995. To our knowledge, specimens of this new taxon have not yet been accessioned at other herbaria.

Morphological study

A careful examination of morphological characters was carried out based on the samples of the vegetative and reproductive material. Morphology was compared with images of all currently recognised minimum rank taxa of Encelia of the Baja California Peninsula and western Mexico in several taxonomic treatments (Blake 1913; Shreve and Wiggins 1964; Wiggins 1980; Clark 1998), as well online image databases (Clark 2000; NaturaLista 2020; BajaFlora 2021). Measurements of vegetative and reproductive structures were made in the field, as well as on rehydrated herbarium material. Photographs were taken using a Stereo Stemi DV4 Spot microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany), a Coolpix B500 digital camera (Nikon, Minato City, Tokyo, Japan), and a Tough TG-5 digital camera (Olympus, Shinjuku City, Japan).

DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing

Total genomic DNA was obtained from 3–5 silica-dried leaves using a DNeasy plant mini-kit (Qiagen, inc., Valencia, California) following the protocol recommended by Qiagen. To counteract the PCR prohibitive effects of co-precipitated polyasaccharides present in some Asteraceae, genomic DNA was diluted to 1:50 parts with nuclease free water. Amplification and sequencing of the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) region was achieved using primers ITS4 and ITS5 (White et al. 1990). The External Transcribed Spacer (ETS) was amplified and sequenced using primers 18S-ETS (Markos and Baldwin 2001) and ETS-HEL-1 (Baldwin and Markos 1998). Both ITS and ETS were amplified with Accupower PCR premix (Bioneer, Daejeon, South Korea) and 17 µl of 1:50 diluted DNA. PCR conditions using the MJ PCT-100 thermalcycler (Marshall scientific, Hampton, NH) replicating the protocol developed by Fehlberg and Ranker (2007) for Encelia as follows: 97 °C for 1 min; 40 cycles of 97 °C for 10 sec, 48 °C for 30 sec, 72 °C for 20 sec with an additional 4 sec per cycle; and 72 °C for 7 min. Post-PCR products were cleaned using magnetic SPRA beads and forward and reverse reads of all loci obtained using Sanger sequencing at the Barker Hall sequencing facility at UC Berkeley. Sequences were assembled and edited in sequencer v. 4.2 (Gene codes corp, Ann Arbor, Michigan). After a query of publicly available sequence data using nucleotide BLAST confirmed a close match to previously sequenced members of Encelia, we aligned sequences visually with the ITS and ETS alignments of Fehlberg and Ranker (2007) for tribe Enceliinae in the software programme Aliview (Larsson 2014). A Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree based on a concatenated matrix of ITS and ETS loci was inferred using RAxML (Stamatakis 2014) on the CIPRES computing portal using 1000 boot strap replicates and a GTRCAT molecular substitution model and visualised in the programme FigTree.

Results

Encelia balandra León De La Luz & Lichter-Marck, sp. nov.

Figs 2, 3

Remark

Capitulum anatomy, particularly solitary heads erect in fruiting, places this new species with members of the frutescens clade, such as E. frutescens and E. virginensis. Molecular analysis also places the species in alliance with the Frutescens clade. The combination of glabrous, epappose cypselae, strigose hairs, a suffruticose habit and solitary heads are unique to this species.

Figure 2. 

Line drawings of Encelia balandra sp. nov. A mature branch with basal leaves and terminal peduncle B strigulose indumentum on leaves, also present in peduncles and phyllaries; also, leaf venation pattern C ray floret, neuter D cypsela, note a broad shallow apical cleft and glabrous faces, epappose E palea F disc floret showing silky villous margins of immature achene G anther cylinder, opened out H immature achene/cypsela and style. Art by Danira León C, based on material from JLLL 12900.

Description

Deciduous perennial herb, suffrutescent, up to 40 cm high, with dense foliage when present. Leaves entire, fleshy, alternate, (2–)3 cm long × 1.5(–2) cm wide, ovate-lanceolate in outline, margins crenate, often with 4 conspicuous, symmetric lobes, basal pair larger than distal, petiole short 2–3 mm long, venation supra-basal and imperfect with 1 or 2 pairs of veins, apex acute, indumentum strigulose, eglandular, multicellular trichomes 1 mm, adpressed, with a semi-bulbose base. Solitary Inflorescence, capitula terminal, peduncles naked, 14–20 cm long in bloom, up to 25 cm in fruit. Capitula 2.5–3 cm diameter, heterogamous, radiate; involucre 1.5–2 cm diameter, phyllaries tri-seriate, 6–9 bracts per series, bracts herbaceous lanceolate to ovate-lanceolate, inner slightly larger than outer, inner 7–8 mm long × 2 mm wide, outer 6–7 mm long × 2 mm wide, occasionally villous at the apex, barely connate at base, scarious to touch, persistent after fruiting; receptacle chaffy, slightly convex, 13–15 mm diameter, 4–6 mm high, some paleaes empty < 1 mm long, silky villous; paleaes subtending disc florets, scarious, concave, subulate, acrescent in age, up to 5 mm long × 3 mm wide, barely villous at ends. Ray florets neuter, 12–15, uniseriate, ray limb yellow, ± spathulate to oblong-elliptic in outline, 10(–12) mm long × 6 mm wide, apex 2-toothed, tube 2 mm long. Disc florets perfect, but either hermaphroditic or functionally male, 40–50+, corolla actinomorphic with narrow cylindrical tube 6 mm long, throat cylindrical-funnelform 1 mm long × 1 mm wide; corolla lobes 5, acute, dark in colour, reflexed, tiny oil dots sparse in the inner side; style 5–6 mm long, stigma branches coiled, linear subulate ± 1.5 mm long, surpassing corolla lobes, short pubescent and papillate outside; stamens 5, 4 mm long, surpassing corolla lobes, but not stigma branches, with stiff rhombic-shaped terminal appendage at level of corolla lobes, thinly glandular, sub-auricular at base, filaments distinct, ±2 mm long. Cypselae monomorphic (but some larger than others), 4–5 mm long × 4(-3) mm wide, laterally compressed, obovoid in outline, with a broad shallow apical cleft, margins densely silky villous (immature), at maturity margins with a thin chartaceous edge < 1 mm, faces glabrous, black, smooth in texture, epappose.

Figure 3. 

Photographs of Encelia balandra illustrating habitat and morphological characters of the capitula and cypselae A habitat on the rocky hills north of Playa Balandra B abaxial view of capitulum showing phyllaries C adaxial view of capitulum showing ray limbs and paleae enfolding disc florets D cypselae. Photos by ILM.

Type

Mexico: Baja California Sur: municipio de La Paz, zona de Protección de Flora y Fauna Balandra, colina adyacente al estacionamiento del Balneario Balandra. 24.324894°N, -110.326251°W, ca. 60 m de elevación, laderas rocosas, 19 de Enero 2020, J.L. León-de la Luz 13007 (holotype: HCIB 31869, isotypes to be distributed UC, MEXU, SD).

Paratypes – Mexico. Baja California Sur: Municipio de La Paz, cerca El Tecolote 6 km al N de Puerto Pichilingue. 24.2000°N, -110.23300°W, ca. 7 m de elevación, 2 de Septiembre 1994, M. Domínguez León 762, HCIB 4740. Municipio de La Paz, Cerro Balandra, 2 km al N de Puerto Pichilingue. 24.323500°N, -110.326700°W, 18 m de elevación, 20 de Enero 1995, M. Domínguez León 959, HCIB 4739. Municipio de La Paz, ladera rocosa cerca de El Pulgero. 24.346067°N, -110.270051°W, 8 m de elevación, 20 de Enero 1995, J.L. León de la Luz 7517, HCIB 5127. Bahía de La Paz, Sierra Riolítica, Cerro Manglar El Merito. 24.301191°N, -110.324712°W, 28 m de elevación, 22 de Noviembre 2013, J.L. León de la Luz 11891, HCIB 624. Bahía de La Paz, Zona de Protección de Flora y Fauna Balandra, Cerro adjunto al Tecolote. 24.3406634°N, -110.304868°W, 15 m de elevación, 10 de Octubre 2019, J.L. León de la Luz 12900, HCIB 31868. Municipio de La Paz, Playa El Tecolote, cerrito al extremo Este de la playa. 24.341095°N, -110.304525°W, 16 m de elevación, 1 de Octubre 2022, J. L. León de la Luz 13125.

Etymology

Balandra Beach is an emblematic place near La Paz, the capitol city of Baja California Sur, which is considered by many to be one of the most scenic beaches in all of Mexico.

Distribution and ecology

This species is known only from the hills of the Balandra/Pichilingue area, where a total of 20 documented individuals occur over an area of no more than 500 hectares. E. balandra grows on coarse gravelly soils to bare rocky outcrops on the slopes of the hills. Some plants were documented on gravelly soil in the immediate vicinity of the seashore. Some insect visitors observed actively pollinating the plants were bees (Apidae), hoverflies (Syrphidae) and wasps (Hymenoptera).

Conservation status

E. balandra is a new species described from an area that is an important touristic destination. The area currently faces pressure due the growing influx of local and international visitors, which spend time either at the beaches or hiking in the hills. Thus far, 20 individuals of E. balandra have been found. Taxonomic resolution of this new species lays the foundation for more targeted surveys to illuminate its population status, environmental restrictions and threats from anthropogenic pressures. Until more information about its status is collected, E. balandra should be categorised as data deficient (DD) under the IUCN current guidelines for Categories and Criteria (IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee 2022). However, we expect that, once surveyed, this rare plant would qualify as having a very restricted distribution with high plausibility of being threatened with extinction (VU). More information and material should be gathered and the environmental authority of Mexico (SEMARNAT) should consider managing visitation within the immediate area as a precautionary measure.

Phenology

E. balandra is herbaceous with a woody taproot. Leaves appear to grow opportunistically in response to late summer, autumn or early winter rainfall. The peduncle and its capitulum, or head, reach anthesis some 20–30 days after a heavy rainfall, when foliar growth ceases. Some inflorescences and fruits could be present in the early autumn after summer rainstorms, but vigorous flowering also occurs if enough early winter rain is present.

Evolutionary affinities

To understand phylogenetic affinities of E. balandra, we used the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) and External Transcribed Spacer (ETS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Both spacers are commonly employed in fine-scale studies of angiosperm relationships and this region has been used for understanding relationships amongst closely-related species within Enceliinae (Fehlberg and Ranker 2007). We extracted DNA and amplified both regions from leaf material sampled from the type specimen. When compared with publicly available DNA sequence data using the BLAST algorithm, our sequences for ITS and ETS were matched to members of Encelia with high percentage identity (ITS: 98.3% match with Encelia frutescens A. Gray MF963851.1; ETS: 98.34% match with Encelia farinosa var. farinosa A. Gray DQ383844). The ML phylogeny output from RaxML placed our study species within the genus Encelia with high support, confirming conclusions drawn from morphological evidence as shown in Fig. 4. Within Encelia, E. balandra occupies an early diverging branch of the frutescens clade with moderate bootstrap support.

Figure 4. 

Phylogenetic position of Encelia balandra. Maximum Likelihood phylogeny of subtribe Enceliinae, based on a combined data matrix of Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) and External Transcribed Spacer (ETS) regions derived from the molecular phylogenetic study of Fehlberg and Ranker (2007), with the addition of Encelia balandra (bold and inset photograph). Bootstrap values along branches indicate statistical support for relationships and were generated using 1000 bootstrap replicates in RAxML using a GTRCAT molecular substitution model (Stamatakis 2014).

GenBank accession numbers

ITS MZ892906, ETS MZ576216.

Discussion

With the addition of this new species, Encelia includes 16 species and five varieties (Clark 1998) notable for their eco-phenotypic variation across divergent desert microhabitats (Singhal et al. 2021). E. balandra represents the first species of Encelia endemic to the Cape region of Baja California Sur, an important biodiversity hotspot with heightened plant endemism (Rebman et al. 2016). As an endemic to a relatively frost-free yet arid climate, E. balandra may prove to be an important subject for eco-physiological studies. Encelia are interfertile and hybrids form with relative ease (Clark 1998), though species boundaries are maintained by strong post-dispersal selection influenced by environmental factors (Kyhos et al. 1981; DiVittorio et al. 2020). The possibility that E. balandra may be of hybrid origin is also, therefore, an important hypothesis for future studies to test.

The limited DNA sequence data included in the current study resolves E. balandra as a sister lineage to the Frutescens clade with moderate statistical support (bs = 80). Morphological affinities between E. balandra and the Frutescens clade include erect fruiting heads and multicellular strigose trichomes (Clark 1998). Weak affinities to either of the major subclades of Encelia suggests that E. balandra may fill a Darwinian deficit in our understanding of the biogeographic and evolutionary history of Encelia. We recommend its inclusion in broad scale studies of this genus using denser sampling of genomic data and suggest that more intensive botanical surveys in the Cape region are needed for the description and conservation of its unique flora rich in micro-endemics.

Finally, we present a dichotomous key, considering morphological data (Table 1) compiled from taxonomic treatments and floras (Blake 1913; Shreve and Wiggins 1964; Wiggins 1980; Clark 1998). The geographical distribution for three Encelia taxa found in the Cape region and that of Magdalena Bay, are illustrated in Fig. 1.

Table 1.

Comparison of morphological traits of Encelia balandra with other Encelia of southern Baja California. (data from: Blake 1913, Shreve and Wiggins 1964, Wiggins 1980 and Clark 1998).

Character/ Taxon Encelia balandra Encelia conspersa Encelia farinosa var. radians Encelia farinosa var. phenicodonta Encelia palmeri
Size (cm) < 60 cm tall < 120 cm tall < 170 cm tall < 170 cm tall < 120 cm tall
Growth habit Suffruticose perennial Suffruticose perennial Woody shrub Woody shrub Suffruticose perennial
Receptacle dimensions (height × diameter [mm]) 4–6 × 13–15 4–5 × 10–12 2 × 3–4 2 × 3–4 8–10 × 10–20
Leaf
Texture Strigose Hispid to pubescent, canescent Glabrate Silvery tomentose Hispid canescent
Trichome length (mm) 1 1 - < 1 < 1
Lamina shape Ovate lanceolate Obovate Lanceolate to ovate Lanceolate to ovate Broadly ovate
Lamina size (length × width [cm]) 3 × 1.5 3.5 × 2.5 8 × 4 7 × 4 3.5–4 × 3.5
Margin Crenate and lobate Entire Dentate and undulate Entire and undulate Sparsely dentate
Petiole length (mm) 2–3 4–10 10–40 10–40 3–10
Peduncle length (cm) 20–25 8–12 15–25 15–25 6–8
Capitulum position Terminal Terminal and axillary Terminal Terminal Terminal and axillary
Capitula number Solitary 1(2) 5–10 5–10 2–5
Phyllary shape Lanceolate to ovate-lanceolate Linear lanceolate to narrowly ovate Lanceolate (outer) to ovate-lanceolate (inner) Lanceolate (outer) to ovate-lanceolate (inner) Linear to lanceolate
Ray floret number 10–12 12–14 11–18 11–18 14–16(–18)
Ray floret dimensions (length × width [mm]) 10 × 6 7–10 × 6 7–11 × 6 7–11 × 6 8–10 × 6
Cypsela
Shape Obovoid Linear-lanceolate Obovate and emarginate Obovate and emarginate Obovate
Dimensions (length × width [mm]) 5 × 4 3 × < 1 4.5 × 1 4.5 × 1 4.5 × 1
Texture Faces glabrous when mature on margin and sides. Villous marginally, faces pubescent Margins villous with silky hairs Margins villous with silky hairs Villous marginally and sparsely on faces
1 Flowering panicle 1–2-branched, each branch monocephalous 2
Flowering panicle 2–4-branched, each up to 5–10 capitul 3
2 Leaf and peduncle indumentum hispid, with canescent hairs Encelia conspersa
Leaf and peduncle indumentum strigose, with conspicuous trichomes Encelia balandra
3 Leaves typically broadly ovate; ray florets 14–18(–20) Encelia palmeri
Leaves typically lanceolate; ray florets 10–12(–14) 4
4 Disc floret corollas blackish; leaf blades glabrate and green; phyllaries glabrate Encelia farinosa var. radians
Disc floret corollas purplish; leaf blades persistently white farinose; phyllaries puberulent Encelia farinosa var. phenicodonta

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Jon Paul Rebman (SD) for the evaluation of this new taxon and for mentorship to ILM. Danira León Coria prepared the illustrations, Alfonso Medel Narváez the maps. Sophia Winitsky and Felipe Zapata provided support to ILM and Nick Marck provided a key technical assist. We also greatly appreciate the participation of HCIB colleague Raymundo Domínguez. The plant material was collected under the Scientific Collection License granted to JLLL by the Directorate General of Wildlife, No. SGPA / DGVS/ 11324 / 13. ILM’s training in Baja California was supported by the Annetta Carter scholarship of the California Botanical Society. We express our gratitude to Peter de Lange and one anonymous reviewer for comments that improved the quality of this manuscript. The authors declare no competing interests. Publication made possible in part by support from the Berkeley Research Impact Initiative (BRII) sponsored by the UC Berkeley Library.

References

  • Aranda-Gómez JJ, Pérez-Venzor JA (1988) Estudio geológico de Punta Coyotes, Baja California Sur. Revista del Instituto de Geología de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 7(1): 1–21.
  • Baldwin BG, Markos S (1998) Phylogenetic utility of the external transcribed spacer (ETS) of 18S–26S rDNA: Congruence of ETS and ITS trees of Calycadenia (Compositae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 10(3): 449–463. https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.1998.0545
  • Blake SF (1913) Contributions from the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University, No. 41. II. A revision of Encelia and some related genera. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 49: 346–396. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.335973
  • Clark C (1998) Phylogeny and adaptation in the Encelia alliance (Asteraceae: Heliantheae). Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany 17(2): 89–98. https://doi.org/10.5642/aliso.19981702.02
  • DiVittorio CT, Singhal S, Roddy AB, Zapata F, Ackerly DD, Baldwin BG, Brodersen CR, Búrquez A, Fine PV, Flores MP, Soltis E (2020) Natural selection maintains species despite frequent hybridization in the desert shrub Encelia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117(52): 33373–33383. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2001337117
  • Fehlberg SD, Ranker TA (2007) Phylogeny and Biogeography of Encelia (Asteraceae) in the Sonoran and Peninsular Deserts Based on Multiple DNA Sequences. Systematic Botany 32(3): 692–699. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364407782250689
  • Kyhos DW, Clark C, Thompson WC (1981) The hybrid nature of Encelia laciniata (Compositae: Heliantheae) and control of population composition by post-dispersal selection. Systematic Botany 6(4): 399–411. https://doi.org/10.2307/2418451
  • Markos S, Baldwin BG (2001) Higher-level relationships and major lineages of Lessingia (Compositae, Astereae) based on nuclear rDNA internal and external transcribed spacer (ITS and ETS) sequences. Systematic Botany 26(1): 168–183.
  • NaturaLista (2020) Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Cd. de México. www.naturalista.mx [accessed: 15 December 2020]
  • Panero J, Funk VA (2002) Toward a phylogenetic subfamilial classification for the Compositae (Asteraceae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 115(4): 909–922.
  • Rebman JP, Gibson J, Rich K (2016) Annotated checklist of the vascular plants of Baja California, Mexico. Proceedings of the San Diego Natural History Museum 45: 1–352.
  • Shreve F, Wiggins IL (1964) Vegetation and Flora of the Sonoran Desert, 2 vols. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1740 pp.
  • Singhal S, Roddy AB, DiVittorio C, Sanchez‐Amaya A, Henriquez CL, Brodersen CR, Fehlberg S, Zapata F (2021) Diversification, disparification and hybridization in the desert shrubs Encelia. The New Phytologist 230(3): 1228–1241. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17212
  • Thiers B (2020) Index Herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium, NY. http://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/ [accessed: 30 March 2021]
  • White T, Bruns JT, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenies. In: Innis M, Gelfand D, Sninsky J, White T (Eds) PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, San Diego, Ca, 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1
  • Wiggins IL (1980) Flora of Baja California. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1025 pp.
login to comment