Research Article |
Corresponding author: Chao Hu ( hc320320@163.com ) Corresponding author: Weichang Huang ( hwc_zx@126.com ) Academic editor: Timothée Le Péchon
© 2022 Zhengwei Wang, Yi Zhang, Ze Zhang, Xiaochen Li, Zhijin Wu, Lan Yan, Aixian Lu, Chengzhi Xie, Chao Hu, Weichang Huang.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Wang Z, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Li X, Wu Z, Yan L, Lu A, Xie C, Hu C, Huang W (2022) Liparis macrosepala (Orchidaceae), a new species from southwest China with its phylogenetic position. PhytoKeys 210: 67-77. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.210.87033
|
A new orchid species, Liparis macrosepala, is illustrated and described from Yunnan Province, China, based on morphological and molecular analyses. This plant is characterised by the ovoid-fusiform, slightly compressed pseudobulbs with 4 or 5 leaves with slightly crisped margins on their apical half, dorsal sepal heart-shaped, lip with a bituberculate basal callus and a thickened folded lateral lobe on each side, centrally with one cavity with slightly raised margins, the column with a single pair of broadly triangular, obtuse wings. Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Inference analyses of combined nrITS and plastid matK DNA sequences place this species in section Cestichis.
Liparis section Cestichis, molecular phylogeny, morphology, matK, nrITS
The genus Liparis Rich. (Epidendroideae, Malaxideae, Malaxidinae) comprises about 320 species distributed worldwide with more than 70 species in China (
During our field surveys in Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China, an unknown species was found. In this paper, we analysed the morphological differences of the newly-found species and its allied species and the phylogenetic position of the new entity is also discussed, based on molecular evidence from nrITS and plastid matK. After careful morphological comparison and phylogenetic analyses, we concluded that this species is new to science.
Materials of the new species were collected from Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China during a field expedition. Morphological characters were observed, measured and photographed based on five living individuals under a stereomicroscope (SZX16-6151, Olympus, Japan) and photographed with a digital camera (D750, Nikon, Japan). A voucher specimen, designated as the holotype, was deposited at
Shanghai Chenshan Herbarium (CSH).
Conservation assessment has been conducted following IUCN guidelines (
DNA sequences of nrDNA ITS and plastid matK of the new species were sequenced and sequences of the same markers for 82 related species were downloaded from GenBank, including five outgroup species from other subtribes (Table
Species Name | nrITS | matK | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Acanthophippium mantinianum L.Linden & Cogn. | AF521081 | AF263618 |
2 | Collabium simplex Rchb.f. | EF670387 | AY557200 |
3 | Crepidium acuminatum (D.Don) Szlach. | KJ459274 | KJ459304 |
4 | Crepidium bahanense (Hand.-Mazz.) S.C.Chen & J.J.Wood | MH116611 | MH117500 |
5 | Crepidium bancanoides (Ames) Szlach. | AB290885 | AB290893 |
6 | Crepidium brevidentatum (Schweinf.) M.A.Clem. & D.L.Jones | AB290886 | AB290894 |
7 | Crepidium resupinatum (G.Forst.) Szlach. | JN114483 | JN004403 |
8 | Dendrobium dixanthum Rchb.f. | KY966535 | KY966825 |
9 | Dienia cylindrostachya Lindl. | JN114491 | JN004422 |
10 | Eria ferruginea Lindl. | AF521071 | AF263660 |
11 | Eulophia graminea Lindl. | MH768269 | MH767976 |
12 | Liparis macrosepala Z.W. Wang, Y. Zhang & W.C. Huang | ON642332 | ON642331 |
13 | Liparis anopheles J.J.Wood | AY907075 | AY907139 |
14 | Liparis assamica King & Pantl. | KJ459276 | KJ459306 |
15 | Liparis aureolabella J.D. Ya & Z.D. Han | MN065679 | MN065733 |
16 | Liparis auriculata Blume ex Miq. | AB289458 | KF262076 |
17 | Liparis balansae Gagnep.-1 | KF589874 | KF589880 |
18 | Liparis balansae Gagnep.-2 | KJ459277 | KJ459307 |
19 | Liparis bingzhongluoensis X.H. Jin | MW169041 | MW169042 |
20 | Liparis bistriata E.C.Parish & Rchb.f. | KJ459279 | KJ459309 |
21 | Liparis bootanensis Griff | KJ459280 | KJ459310 |
22 | Liparis bracteata T.E.Hunt | AY907076 | AY907140 |
23 | Liparis brunnescens Schltr. | AY907098 | AY907165 |
24 | Liparis condylobulbon Rchb.f. | AY907080 | AY907144 |
25 | Liparis cordifolia Hook.f. | KJ459282 | KJ459312 |
26 | Liparis delicatula Hook.f. | KJ459283 | KJ459313 |
27 | Liparis distans C.B.Clarke | KJ459284 | KJ459314 |
28 | Liparis disticha (Thouars) Lindl. | AY907081 | AY907145 |
29 | Liparis elliptica Wight | KJ459285 | KJ459315 |
30 | Liparis fissilabris Tang & F.T.Wang | KJ459286 | KJ459316 |
31 | Liparis fissipetala Finet | KJ459287 | KJ459317 |
32 | Liparis formosana Rchb.f. | AY907082 | AY907147 |
33 | Liparis fujisanensis F.Maek. ex Konta & S.Matsumoto | EU024936 | EU024937 |
34 | Liparis gibbosa Finet-1 | AY907083 | AY907148 |
35 | Liparis gibbosa Finet-2 | AY907084 | AY907149 |
36 | Liparis glossula Rchb.f. | KJ459289 | KJ459319 |
37 | Liparis guangxiensis C.L.Feng & X.H.Jin | KF589875 | KF589881 |
38 | Liparis japonica (Miq.) Maxim. | AY907086 | AY907151 |
39 | Liparis koreana (Nakai) Nakai | EU017422 | EU017444 |
40 | Liparis kumokiri F.Maek. | AY907087 | AY907152 |
41 | Liparis latifolia Lindl. | AY907088 | AY907153 |
42 | Liparis latilabris Rolfe | KJ459291 | KJ459321 |
43 | Liparis liliifolia (L.) Rich. ex Lindl. | AY907090 | AY907156 |
44 | Liparis loeselii (L.) Rich. | AY907091 | AY907157 |
45 | Liparis makinoana Schltr. | EU017405 | EU017428 |
46 | Liparis mannii Rchb.f. | KJ459293 | KJ459323 |
47 | Liparis meihuashanensis S.M.Fan | MF959772 | MF959773 |
48 | Liparis mengziensis J.D. Ya & Lei Cai | MN065734 | MN065678 |
49 | Liparis nanlingensis H.Z.Tian & F.W.Xing | AB701346 | / |
50 | Liparis napoensis L.Li, H.F.Yan & S.J. Li-1 | MT012899 | MT019986 |
51 | Liparis napoensisL.Li, H.F.Yan & S.J. Li -2 | MT012900 | MT019987 |
52 | Liparis nervosa (Thunb.) Lindl. | AY907092 | AY907158 |
53 | Liparis nugentiae F.M.Bailey | AY907093 | AY907159 |
54 | Liparis odorata (Willd.) Lindl. | KJ021033 | KJ021029 |
55 | Liparis pandurata Ames | AY907094 | AY907160 |
56 | Liparis pauliana Hand.-Mazz. | AY907096 | AY907163 |
57 | Liparis petiolata (D.Don) P.F.Hunt & Summerh. | MW186826 | MW187482 |
58 | Liparis resupinata Ridl. | KJ459297 | KJ459327 |
59 | Liparis somae Hayata-1 | MT012898 | MT019985 |
60 | Liparis somae Hayata-2 | MT012897 | MT019984 |
61 | Liparis sootenzanensis Fukuy. | KJ021034 | KJ021030 |
62 | Liparis stricklandiana Rchb.f.-1 | MT012903 | MT019990 |
63 | Liparis stricklandiana Rchb.f. -2 | KJ459298 | KJ459328 |
64 | Liparis sula N.Hallé | AY907104 | AY907171 |
65 | Liparis terrestris J.B.Comber | AY907105 | AY907172 |
66 | Liparis truncicola Schltr. | AY907106 | AY907173 |
67 | Liparis viridiflora (Blume) Lindl.-1 | MT012902 | MT019989 |
68 | Liparis viridiflora (Blume) Lindl.-2 | MT012901 | MT019988 |
69 | Malaxis brachypoda (A.Gray) Fernald | AY907108 | AY907175 |
70 | Malaxis monophyllos (L.) Sw. | MW181626 | MW187483 |
71 | Malaxis soulei L.O.Williams | AY907119 | AY907186 |
72 | Malaxis abieticola Salazar & Soto Arenas | AY907129 | AY907196 |
73 | Oberonia acaulis Griff. | KY242066 | KY241943 |
74 | Oberonia brunoniana Wight | JN114623 | JN004516 |
75 | Oberonia equitans (G.Forst.) Mutel | AY907130 | AY907198 |
76 | Oberonia heliophile Rchb.f. | AY907131 | AY907199 |
77 | Oberonia iridifolia Roxb. ex Lindl. | AY907132 | AY907200 |
78 | Oberonia mucronata (D.Don) Ormerod & Seidenf | JN114640 | JN004534 |
79 | Oberonia neocaledonica Schltr.-1 | AY907133 | AY907201 |
80 | Oberonia neocaledonica Schltr.-2 | AY907134 | AY907202 |
81 | Oberonia padangensis Schltr. | AY907135 | AY907203 |
82 | Oberonia wappeana J.J.Sm. | AY907138 | AY907206 |
83 | Oberonioides pusillus (Rolfe) Marg. & Szlach. | KJ527610 | KJ459302 |
DNA sequences were aligned using the MAFFT programme in Geneious v. 2020.2.4 (https://www.geneious.com, accessed on 10 March 2021). Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) in RAxML v.7.0.4 (
The length of nrITS matrix was 792 bp including 262 parsimony-informative sites and for matK, the length and parsimony-informative sites were 1443 bp and 120, respectively. Both analyses (MP and BI) recovered similar relationships. The ML tree with bootstrap percentages, on which the posterior probabilities from the BI analysis were also indicated, is shown in Fig.
Maximum Likelihood tree of Liparis and its allied genera in subtribe Malaxidinae inferred from the combined analysis of nrITS and matK. ML bootstrap values (MLBP)/Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) are indicated above the branches, respectively. The sectional taxonomy of Liparis follows
The phylogenetic analyses indicate that Liparis is not monophyletic, being mingled with species of other genera of Malaxideae. This result agrees with what was found in previous studies (
Liparis is defined as species with racemose inflorescences, resupinate lip lacking a spur, column without a conspicuous foot and four pollinia in two pairs with small viscidium, but no caudicle. The morphology of Liparis macrosepala is in accordance with the characteristics of sect. Cestichis like the slightly flattened, narrowly winged rachis with alternating bracts. The morphological characters can distinguish Liparis macrosepala from its close relatives L. delicatula, L. fissipetala, L. assamica and L. resupinata.
China. Yunnan Province (云南), Xishuangbanna (西双版纳), Mengla County (勐腊县) epiphyte on the tree trunk, 1620 m elev., 23Nov 2021, Zhengwei Wang, Xiaochen Li, Yu Zhang& Zhijin Wu, WZW04247 (holotype: CSH!)
Liparis macrosepala is characterised by the ovoid-fusiform, slightly compressed pseudobulbs with 4 or 5 alternate leaves on their apical half, these with slightly crispate margins, dorsal sepal ovate with cordate base, broadly elliptic, ca. 4 mm long, 2 callus-shaped and thickened folds, base with 2 oblong lobes on both sides, centrally with 1 thickened, concave callus, column with a single pair of arcuate wings.
Liparis macrosepala A flower, front view B flower, side view C lip, side view D inflorescence E column, side view F lip and column, side view G lip, back view H lip, front view I flowering plant J pollinia and anther cap K perianth dissection L column and ovary, oblique view M ovary, transection. Drawn by Lan Yan.
Epiphytic herbs. Roots slender, flexuose. Pseudobulbs clustered, ovoid-fusiform, slightly compressed laterally, 1–2 × 0.5–1 cm, upper half with 4–5 widely spaced leaves. Leaf blade ovate-oblong, 1.8–2.3 × 0.8–1.2 cm, apex acuminate, base contracted into a short petiole, articulate, margins of their apical half slightly crispate. Peduncle 7–10 cm long, with several sterile bracts 2–5 mm long; raceme with 7–10 flowers arranged in zigzag manner. Floral bracts broadly ovate with cordate base, 2–3 × 1–1.5 mm, acute. Flowers greenish-orange; pedicel and ovary ca. 7 mm long. Dorsal sepal broadly ovate with cordate base, 3.2–5 × 3–3.6 mm, 1-veined, abaxially carinate, apex acute; lateral sepal oblong-ovate or ovate-lanceolate, 5–6 × ca. 0.6 mm long, abaxially slightly carinate. Petals narrowly linear, 3–4 × ca. 0.2 mm; lip elliptic, 2–3 × ca. 1 mm, apex apiculate, base bearing a bituberculate callus, then expanded on each side into a thickened, folded, rounded lobe, with 1 excavation with raised margins between the lobes. Column straight, ca. 2 mm long, with a pair of subtriangular, obtuse wings on each side near the middle and a ridge on the back of the column. Anther cap hemispherical, pale yellow; pollinia 4 in 2 pairs with one pollinium of each pair smaller than the other, waxy, brownish, with minute apical viscidium.
Phenology: Flowering in November–December.
It is found on tree trunks on a limestone ridge-top evergreen broad-leaved forest at an elevation of 1500–1700 m in Mengna County, Xishuangbanna Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan Province, People’s Republic of China. The habitat presents a tropical monsoon climate.
The species epithet refers to the large and conspicuous dorsal sepal of the flower.
Liparis macrosepala differs from L. delicatula in its 4 to 5 leaves with slightly crispate margins on their apical half and single pair of wings on the column. Its entire, not Y-shaped petals and sessile lip (i.e. without a claw) easily distingush L. macrosepala from L. fissipetala. The dosal sepal of L. assamica is narrowly ovate-oblong, in contrast with the heart-shaped dorsal sepal of Liparis macrosepala. Liparis resupinata is distinguished from L. macrosepala by its 10–50-flowered raceme and the column with a single pair of broad wings, each with a retrorse thread. The main differences between these closely-related species, according to our phylogenetic analyses, are summarised in Table
Characters | L. delicatula | L. fissipetala | L. assamica | L. resupinata | L. macrosepala |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pseudobulbs | oblong or cylindrical-fusiform 5–9 3–5 mm | ovoid, 8–10 mm long | ovoid-fusiform, slightly compressed 1.5–2.5 cm × 6–10 mm | subcylindrical or ± spindle-shaped, 1.8–5 cm × 3–6 mm | ovoid-fusiform, slightly compressed, 1–2 cm × 0.5–1 cm |
Leaf | 2 or 3, margin flat | 3 or 4, strongly crisped-margined | 3 or 4, apical half slightly crisped-margined | 3 or 4, margin slightly serrate | 4 or 5, apical half slightly crisped-margined |
Scape | 2–5 cm, several to 10-flowered, flowers white | 5–10 cm long, with 10–15 flowers, flowers yellow, | 10–13 cm, more than 10-flowered, flowers orange | 7–18 cm, 10–50-flowered, flowers pale green or greenish-yellow | 7–10 cm, more than 10-flowered, flowers greenish-orange |
Bracts | ovate-lanceolate, 2–3 mm | ovate-lanceolate, 1.5–3.5 mm | lanceolate, 2–3 mm | lanceolate, 3–5 mm | broadly ovate, 2–3 mm |
Dorsal sepal | ovate-oblong, 2.5–3 × 1.5–1.8 mm | oblong-lanceolate, 3–4 × 0.8–1 mm | narrowly ovate-oblong, 4.8–5.8 × ca. 1.6 mm | oblong or elliptic-oblong, ca. 4 × 1.8 mm | broadly ovate, ca. 3.2–5 ×3–3.6 mm |
Petals | narrowly linear-lanceolate, 2.5–3 × ca. 0.5 mm, entire | narrow linear, 4–5 mm long, Y-shaped | narrowly linear, 5–5.5 × ca. 0.7 mm, entire | narrowly linear, ca. 3.5 × 0.3 mm, entire | narrowly linear, 3–4 × ca. 0.2 mm, entire |
Lip | broadly elliptic or orbicular, ca. 2.5 mm, base with an orbicular, auriculate, callus-shaped fold on either side, with a concave callus near base | epichile broadly oblong or subsquare, 1.5–2 × 1–1.5 mm, base with two auricles on both sides; claw short, with a fleshy callus centrally near base | broadly obovate-oblong, ca. 4 × 2.7 mm, with two callus-shaped thickened folds, two suborbicular lobes on both sides, centrally with one concave callus near base | broadly elliptic-oblong or broadly ovate-oblong, 2.5–3 mm, with two lateral splits below middle; two suborbicular lobes, centrally with one bilobed callus near base | broadly elliptic, ca. 2–3 mm long, two callus-shaped and thickened folds, base with two oblong lobes on both sides, centrally with one bituberculate callus near base |
Column | ca. 2.2 mm, two pairs of wings | ca. 1.5 mm, broadly winged with two horn-like appendages | ca. 2 mm, two pairs of wings | ca. 2.8 mm, a pair of wings, each with a retrorse thread | ca. 2 mm, a single pair of subtriangular wings |
The new species was found in a ridge-top evergreen broad-leaved forest on a limestone mountain. Despite numerous surveys in the areas, only six mature individuals were found without fruits or evidence of cross-pollination.
This extremely small effective population occurs in a touristic zone which is a serious threat to the survival of the species. Consequently, the species can be assessed as Critically Endangered (CR, D), based on current information and following IUCN guidelines (
This study was supported by grants from the National Wild Plant Germplasm Resource Centre for Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden (ZWGX2102), the Science and Technology Commission, Shanghai Municipality (19390743600) and the project of Shanghai Landscaping and City Appearance Administrative Bureau (G192424, G202401). We are grateful to Mingzhong Huang for his help with the literature and Hongjin Wei for his fieldwork. We are grateful to Dr. Pankaj Kumar for his help in improving the language and describing the conservation status. We are also grateful to the reviewers for their valuable views in improving this article.