Research Article
Print
Research Article
Plagiothecium talbotii, a new species from the Aleutian Islands (Alaska, U.S.A.)
expand article infoGrzegorz J. Wolski, Paulina Nowicka-Krawczyk, William R. Buck§
‡ University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
§ Institute of Systematic Botany, The New York Botanical Garden, New York, United States of America
Open Access

Abstract

Plagiothecium talbotii sp. nov. is described from Attu Island, Alaska, U.S.A. The newly-described species is not similar in appearance to any Northern Hemisphere species; only the habit is similar to P. platyphyllum. However, it not only occupies a different habitat than that species, but genetically and morphologically, it is clearly distinct from it. The results of DNA sequencing, a detailed description of the morphological features, illustrations, ecological preferences and currently known geographical distribution of P. talbotii are presented. The most important distinguishing morphological features of this species are: the size of the plant; dimensions and symmetry of the leaves; dimensions of cells and their areolation; entire leaf apex; and long decurrencies with some inflated cells. Additionally, we propose to place P. talbotii in section Plagiothecium, which is confirmed by genetic analysis and morphological features.

Keywords

Attu Island, Bryophyta, Plagiotheciaceae, S. S. Talbot, taxonomy

Introduction

Herbarium collections are unquestionably a rich and very important source of data on the ecology and distribution of plants. Revisions based on herbarium material are the primary source for taxonomic research. Now, having a number of methods at our disposal (e.g. genetic analyses, mathematical modelling, SEM), integrative taxonomy sheds new light not only on the status or distribution of the taxa studied, but also on the relationships between them and not only at the species level (e.g. Huttunen et al. 2018; Guerra et al. 2019; Ignatov et al. 2020; Plášek and Ochyra 2020; Vigalondo et al. 2020; Wolski and Nowicka-Krawczyk 2020; Wolski et al. 2020; Melamed et al. 2021).

Despite the fact that the Northern Hemisphere is relatively well studied botanically, there are still many areas that are blank spots for this part of the world. The same is true for bryophytes as for vascular plants, but even more so. Many species, genera and even families require basic research related to their variability, distribution, ecology or taxonomic status (Anderson et al. 1990; Ignatov et al. 2006; Hodgetts 2015; Suzuki 2016; Hodgetts and Lockhart 2020; Wolski et al. 2021a, b).

The genus Plagiothecium Schimp. which currently has been divided by Wynns et al. (2018) into nine sections (Leptophyllum Jedl.; Lycambium Jedl.; Ortholimnobium (Dixon) J.T. Wynns; Orthophyllum Jedl.; Plagiothecium; Pseudo-Neckera (Kindb.) J.T. Wynns; Rectithecium (Hedenäs & Huttunen) J.T. Wynns; Saviczia (Abramova & I.I. Abramov) Z. Iwats.; Struckia (Müll. Hal.) J.T. Wynns) over the past decades may give the impression of being well-researched. However, the genus was described as fairly species-poor and represented in the Northern Hemisphere by only a dozen taxa (e.g. Ireland 1969, 1986; Iwatsuki 1970; Lewinsky 1974; Smith 2001). The understanding of Plagiothecium has changed relatively recently, when DNA-based research proved that many of the taxa have been too broadly circumscribed (Zuo et al. 2011; Wynns et al. 2018; Ignatova et al. 2019; Wolski and Nowicka-Krawczyk 2020) and that the bryoflora of North America, Europe and Asia is much richer in Plagiothecium than previously assumed (e.g. Wynns et al. 2018; Ignatova et al. 2019; Wolski, Jukoninė 2019; Wolski 2020a, b; Müller and Wynns 2020; Wolski and Nowicka-Krawczyk 2020; Wolski et al. 2021b).

However, despite extensive research now being carried out, the number of Northern Hemisphere species still seems to be underestimated. Alaska, including the Aleutian Islands, are a “blank spot” in our knowledge of mosses, including the genus Plagiothecium. As a result of the taxonomic revision of Plagiothecium from the Aleutians, we recently described a new species, Plagiothecium schofieldii (Wolski et al. 2021a). Examination of additional material resulted in yet another undescribed species being discovered.

Materials and methods

Taxonomic analyses

Specimens from the Missouri Botanical Garden (MO), the University of British Columbia (UBC) and The New York Botanical Garden (NY) were analysed during the revision of Plagiothecium from the Aleutian Islands. A single specimen (MO 5925637) was selected for DNA analysis, with the appropriate consent from the herbarium curator.

DNA isolation, amplification and sequencing

Total DNA was extracted using the GeneMATRIX Plant & Fungi DNA Purification Kit (Eurx, Gdansk, Poland) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Three equal samples of 20 mg of dry tissue from the leafy stems of bryophytes were homogenised in the lysis buffer, delivered by the purification kit, using a hand-held stainless steel homogeniser (Schlüter Biologie, Eutin, Germany). DNA extracts were quantified with a BioDrop DUO Spectrophotometer (BioDrop Ltd, Cambridge, U.K.) and the sample with high quality DNA (1.7–1.9 OD260/OD280) was selected for further analysis.

The molecular research was based on nuclear and chloroplast DNA markers: ITS (from the 3´ end of the nuclear spacer ITS1, through the 5.8S rDNA, to the 5´ end of the ITS2 spacer); and rpl16 cpDNA gene encoding ribosomal protein L16. Markers were selected, based on Wynns et al. (2018), Wolski and Nowicka-Krawczyk (2020) and Wolski et al. (2021) from Plagiothecium-focused studies.

All markers were amplified by PCR in a few replicates to obtain high quality amplicons for sequencing. PCR was performed using primers and reaction conditions as described in Wolski et al. (2021).

PCR products were visualised on an agarose gel (1.5%, 90V, 40 minutes) stained with GelRED fluorescent dye (Biotum, Fremont, CA, U.S.A.) and two replicates of each marker per sample were chosen for sequencing. Amplicons from the PCR reaction were cleaned using Syngen Gel/PCR Mini Kit (Syngen Biotech, Wrocław, Poland) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Samples were sequenced with Sanger sequencing, using primers from amplification by SEQme s.r.o. company (Dobris, Czech Republic). The obtained sequences were assembled in Geneious 11.1.5 (Biomatters Aps, Aarhus, Denmark) (http://www.geneious.com). The sequences were submitted to the NCBI GenBank database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) under the accession numbers OM337522 for ITS and OM311940 for rpl16.

Phylogenetic analyses

Phylogenetic analyses of the studied specimen and other species in the Plagiothecium group (Table 1) were performed, based on a concatenated ITS-rpl16 sequence matrix. Sequences were aligned using the MAFFT v. 7 web server (Katoh et al. 2017) (http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/) where the auto strategy was applied, the scoring matrix of 200PAM with Gap opening penalty of 1.53, UniREf50 for Maft-homologs and Plot and alignment with threshold of 39 score were set. The obtained alignments were checked for poorly and ambiguously aligned regions and small corrections were made by eye. The evolutionary models were calculated using PartitionFinder 2 software (Lanfear et al. 2016), chosen according to the Akaike Information Criterion (Table 2).

Table 1.

Voucher information and accession numbers for the specimens included in the phylogenetic analyses.

Taxon Collection Locality ITS rpl16
Isopterygiopsis pulchella UC barcode 1947397 USA: CA KY550336 KY514042
P. angusticellum Wolski 5 Poland MN077501 MN311136
P. angusticellum Wolski 22 Poland MN077507 MN311142
P. angusticellum Wolski 23 Poland MN077508 MN311143
P. angusticellum Wolski 25 Poland MN077510 MN311145
P. angusticellum Wolski 26 Poland MN077511 MN311146
P. angusticellum Wolski 29 Poland MN077513 MN311148
P. brasiliense E barcode 00387968 Brazil KY550266 KY513971
P. cavifolium CP:J.T. Wynns 1885 Denmark: Sjaelland KF882225 KF882325
P. cavifolium CP:J.T. Wynns 2960 Germany: Schauinsland, Hochschwarzwald KF882226 KF882326
P. conostegium NY:S.P. Churchill et al. 19839 Bolivia KY550271 KY513976
P. conostegium NY barcode 00845279 Guatemala KY550318 KY514024
P. conostegium S-B53327 Mexico KY550272 KY513977
P. denticulatum CP:J.T. Wynns 2081 Denmark: Sjælland, Sorø Kommune KF882229 KF882329
P. denticulatum BONN:O.M. Afoninas.n. Russia: Far East, Chukotka KY550275 KY513980
P. denticulatum C:R.R. Ireland 23098 Canada: ON KY550276 KY513981
P. denticulatum var. bullulae UC barcode 1798690 USA: NV KY550278 KY513983
P. denticulatum var. bullulae UC barcode 1947417 USA: CA KY550277 KY513982
P. denticulatum var. obtusifolium CP:J.T. Wynns 2842 Germany: Hochschwarzwald, Schauinsland KF882230 KF882330
P. denticulatum var. obtusifolium UC barcode 1724036 USA: WA KY550279 KY513984
P. denticulatum fo. pungens DUKE barcode 0150010 USA: Alaska, Simenof Island KY550280 KY513985
P. japonicum DUKE barcode 0172241 USA: Alaska, Simenof Island KY550291 KY513996
P. lamprostachys S-B54613 Australia: VIC KY550284 KY513989
P. lamprostachys DUKE barcode 0156846 Australia: VIC KY550285 KY513990
P. lamprostachys S:H. Streimann 47719 Australia: NSW KY550282 KY513987
P. longisetum Wolski 12 Poland MN077502 MN311137
P. longisetum Wolski 14 Poland MN077503 MN311138
P. longisetum Wolski 15 Poland MN077504 MN311139
P. longisetum Wolski 19 Poland MN077506 MN311141
P. membranosulum BONN:J.-P. Frahm7756 Democratic Republic of the Congo KY550310 KY514015
P. membranosulum S-B78514 South Africa KY550303 KY514008
P. membranosulum DUKE barcode 0016754 South Africa KY550304 KY514009
P. nemorale CP:J.T. Wynns 3044 Germany: Farnberg, Schwarzwald-Baar KF882239 KF882339
P. nemorale CP: J.T. Wynns 2684 Germany: Mooswald, Kaiserstuhl KF882237 KF882337
P. nemorale Mishler 3835 Iran: Sisangan National Park, Manzandaran Prov. KF882238 KF882338
P. ovalifolium DUKE barcode 0188886 Chile KY550314 KY514019
P. platyphyllum C:J. Lewinsky et al. s.n. Finland: Haluna, Nilsiae, Savonia borealis KF882241 KF882341
P. ruthei CP: J.T. Wynns 1997 Denmark: Sjælland, Lyngby Aamose KF882242 KF882342
P. talbotii W.B. Schofield, S.S. Talbot 120206, MO 5925637 (dupl. UBC OM337522 OM311940

Phylogenetic calculations were performed using Maximum Likelihood analysis (ML) in the IQ-TREE web server (Trifinopoulos et al. 2016) (http://iqtree.cibiv.univie.ac.at/) with the ultrafast bootstrap (UFBoot) pseudolikelihood algorithm (Hoang et al. 2018) and 10000 replicates; and Bayesian Inference (BI) in MrBayes 3.2.2 (Ronquist et al. 2012) where two parallel Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) runs for four million generations each, with trees sampled every 1000 generations. The average standard deviation of split frequencies in both cases remained below 0.01 for the last 1000 generations and posterior probabilities were estimated from the 50% majority-rule consensus tree after elimination of the first 25% of samples as burn-in. The alignment and tree files were submitted to the figshare online database (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.18586082.v1).

Table 2.

Summary of partitions for ITS-rpl16 matrix (1526 bp) evolutionary model selection and phylogenetic interference using PartitionFinder2.

ITS1 5.8S gDNA ITS2 rpl16 intron rpl16 codon
ML F81 JC HKY +I TN+I F81
BI F81 JC HKY GTR F81

Haplotype network analysis was performed using Median Joining Network in PopART v. 1.7 with gap coding as a single event, irrespective of length and haplotype geographic distribution (Leigh and Bryant 2015).

Results and discussion

Phylogenetic analyses using the concatenated ITS-rpl16 matrix placed this Alaskan specimen within the sister branch of the sect. Plagiothecium clade with high support from Bayesian Inference (PP = 0.99), but slightly lower support from Maximum Likelihood (BS = 87) (Fig. 1). Although the topology of the tree shows clear distinction of the examined material, the closest representative with maximum support from BI to P. talbotii is the specimen BONN: O.M. Afonina s.n. described as P. denticulatum.

Figure 1. 

Phylogenetic tree of Plagiothecium taxa (sect. Plagiothecium [upper] and Orthophyllum [lower clade] with Isopterygiopsis pulchella as the outgroup, based on concatenated nuclear (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2) and chloroplast (rpl16) DNA markers (total 1526 bp). The tree presents the position of the studied specimen from Alaska amongst Plagiothecium. Numbers on branches indicate bootstrap values from ML followed by posterior probabilities from BI analysis. An asterisk (*) indicates 100 (ML) and 1.00 (BI), while a minus sign (-) indicates values below 75 (ML) and 0.95 (BI). The topology of the tree was based on ML analysis.

The haplotype network (Fig. 2) also confirms a closer relationship of P. talbotii with sect. Plagiothecium than with representatives from sect. Orthophyllum; however, the position of P. talbotii is isolated. The lowest number of mutational steps to P. talbotii as mentioned earlier is the specimen BONN: O.M. Afonina s.n. of P. denticulatum. This material was collected from the Far East of Russia – from Chukotka (Table 1), a geographic region adjacent to Alaska.

Figure 2. 

Median-joining haplotype network of Plagiothecium [bottom-right] and Orthophyllum sections [top-left] of Plagiothecium constructed in PopART. Haplotypes are represented by circles with colours indicating geographic distribution. Numbers on branches indicate the mutational steps.

Although DNA analysis places the tested specimen as a sister clade to the clade represented by taxa from section Plagiothecium, it is morphologically different from most of the representatives of this section.

The shape of the decurrent angular cells is one of the most important features that divide the taxa of this genus into individual sections (Wynns et al. 2018; Wolski et al. 2021a, b). Almost all taxa from sect. Plagiothecium form distinct auricles, but not P. talbotii. The alar regions in this species are long and composed of sometimes inflated cells, a feature common to both P. talbotii and P. platyphyllum (Nyholm 1965; Lewinsky 1974; Smith 2001).

Having leaves shrunken in a dry condition and symmetrical make P. talbotii resemble, amongst the Northern Hemisphere of Plagiothecium, the previously-mentioned P. platyphyllum (Lewinsky 1974; Smith 2001). However, P. talbotii is distinguished from P. platyphyllum by the size of the leaves; lack of serration near leaf apex; lack of a group of eroded, thin-walled cells (nematocysts) and rhizoids near the leaf apex; dimensions of laminal cells; and habitat occupied by the species (Nyholm 1965; Lewinsky 1974; Smith 2001).

Amongst the Northern Hemisphere species belonging to sect. Plagiothecium at present, there is only one species characterised by a symmetrical leaf: P. schofieldii. However, for example, the size and appearance of the turf; the lack of shrinkage and leaf shape, i.e. their concavity and serration and the shape of the decurrent angular cells differentiates this species from P. talbotii (Wolski et al. 2021b).

Other species of this section are characterised by asymmetrical to slightly asymmetrical leaves and a completely different set of features when compared with P. talbotii (e.g. Lewinsky 1974; Smith 2001; Wolski et al. 2021b).

Taking into account the above facts, we believe that this species belongs to Plagiothecium sect. Plagiothecium. Thus, we consider that all the above morphological data, supported by molecular studies, warrant the recognition of the Aleutian samples as a new species.

Taxonomy

Plagiothecium talbotii G.J.Wolski & W.R.Buck, sp. nov.

Type

U.S.A. Alaska, Attu Island, Lake Elwood area, under tall herbs on slope, 52°51'N, 173°10'E, 14 Sep 2002, W.B. Schofield and S.S. Talbot 120206, holotype MO 5925637, isotype UBC B193528.

Description

Plants large, dark green, without metallic luster, forming loose mats. Stems erect, julaceous in the lower part, more complanate above, 3.0–5.0 cm long (Fig. 3), very thick, in cross-section rounded, with a diameter of 500–700 μm, the central strand very well developed, epidermal cells 16–43 (M 25) × 12–39 (M 25) μm, the parenchyma thin-walled, 25–50 (M 36) × 18–60 (M 37) μm; leaves large, concave, symmetrical, ovate, imbricate, in wet condition, rather closely arranged on the stem, shrunken and sticking out when dry, those leaves from the middle of the stem 3.8–5.0 (M 4.4) mm long and the width measured at the widest point 1.9–3.1 mm (M 2.4); the apex obtuse and apiculate, entire, not denticulate; costae two, thick, strong and very large, extending usually more than ½ of the leaf length, reaching 1.0–3.0 mm (M 2.0); laminal cells rather symmetrical, in unregulated transverse rows, the length and width very variable, but dependent on location: 83–137 (M 101) × 17–22 (M 19) μm at apex, 100–175 (M 139) × 18–32 (M 24) μm at mid-leaf and 88–197 (M 132) × 22–35 (M 28) μm towards insertion, cell areolation loose; decurrencies very long, 700–1000 μm, composed of 3–4 rows of rectangular, at least some gently inflated cells, 90–216 (M 143) × 24–34 (M 28) μm. Sporophytes unknown so far.

Figure 3. 

The most important taxonomic features of Plagiothecium talbotii. Stem (A) in dry condition; leaves from the middle of the stem (B), dimensions of cells from the apex (C), the middle (D) and basal part of the leaf (E). Drawing by G.J. Wolski from the holotype (W.B. Schofield and S.S. Talbot 120206, MO 5925637 [dupl. UBC B193528]). Scale bars: 1 cm (A); 1000 µm (B); 100 µm (C–E).

Etymology

The present species is named in honour of Stephen S. Talbot who spent decades studying the northern regions of North America, including the Aleutian Islands and who, with Wilfred B. Schofield on 14 September 2002, collected the specimen (No. 120206), chosen here as the holotype of Plagiothecium talbotii.

Distribution and ecology

Plagiothecium talbotii so far has only been recorded from Attu Island in Alaska. In this area, it has been recorded in a non-forested area, on a slope, under tall herbs.

Acknowledgements

We thank the late Dr. Judy Harpel for the opportunity to revise the Aleutian Plagiothecium species. The research was funded from a grant Genetic study on variability of selected taxa of the genus Plagiothecium NCN “Miniatura 4” – DEC-2020/04/X/NZ8/00420.

References

  • Anderson LE, Crum HA, Buck WR (1990) List of the mosses of North America north of Mexico. The Bryologist 93(4): 448–499. https://doi.org/10.2307/3243611
  • Guerra J, Jiménez-Martínez F, Cano J, Alonso M, Gallego M (2019) Schistidium convergens (Grimmiaceae, Bryophyta), a new species from southern Spain and Morocco. Nova Hedwigia 109(1–2): 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2019/0529
  • Hoang DT, Chernomor O, Von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS (2018) UFBoot2: Improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35(2): 518–522. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx281
  • Hodgetts NG (2015) Checklist and country status of European bryophytes—towards a new Red List for Europe. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 84; National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Hodgetts N, Lockhart N (2020) Checklist and country status of European bryophytes – update 2020. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 123. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland.
  • Huttunen S, Hedenäs L, Ignatov MS (2018) Phylogenetic position of Homalothecium laevisetum and relationship with the genus Palamocladium. Arctoa 27(1): 91–10. https://doi.org/10.15298/arctoa.27.09
  • Ignatov MS, Afonina OM, Ignatova EA, Abolina A, Akatova TV, Baisheva EZ, Bardunov LV, Baryakina EA, Belkina OA, Bezgodov AG, Boychuk MA, Cherdantseva VY, Czernyadjeva IV, Doroshina GY, Dyachenko AP, Fedosov VE, Goldberg IL, Ivanova EI, Jukoniene I, Kannukene L, Kazanovsky SG, Kharzinov ZK, Kurbatova LE, Maksimov AI, Mamatkulov UK, Manakyan VA, Maslovsky OM, Napreenko MG, Otnyukova TN, Partyka LY, Pisarenko OY, Popova NN, Rykovsky GF, Tubanova DY, Zheleznova GV, Zolotov VI (2006) Check-list of mosses of East Europe and North Asia. Arctoa 15(1): 1–130. https://doi.org/10.15298/arctoa.15.01
  • Ignatov MS, Kučera J, Hedenäs L, Oxana I, Kuznetsova OI, Ignatova EA (2020) A revision of the genus Orthothecium (Plagiotheciaceae, Bryophyta) in northern Eurasia. Arctoa 29(1): 10–48. https://doi.org/10.15298/arctoa.29.02
  • Ignatova EA, Fedorova AV, Kuznetsova OI, Ignatov MS (2019) Taxonomy of the Plagiothecium laetum complex (Plagiotheciaceae, Bryophyta) in Russia. Arctoa 28(1): 28–45. https://doi.org/10.15298/arctoa.28.05
  • Ireland RR (1969) A taxonomic revision of the genus Plagiothecium for North America, north of Mexico. National Museum of Natural Sciences Publications in Botany 1: [i–viii] 1–118.
  • Ireland RR (1986) Synopsis of the genus Plagiothecium in North America. Lindbergia 12: 49–56.
  • Iwatsuki Z (1970) A revision of Plagiothecium and its related genera from Japan and her adjacent areas, I. The Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 33: 331–380.
  • Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD (2017) MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Briefings in Bioinformatics 20(4): 1160–1166. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx108
  • Lanfear R, Frandsen PB, Wright AM, Senfeld T, Calcott B (2016) PartitionFinder 2: New methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34: 772–773. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw260
  • Lewinsky J (1974) The family Plagiotheciaceae in Denmark. Lindbergia 2: 185–217.
  • Melamed D, Segarra-Moragues JG, Puche F, Garcia CA, Sérgio C (2021) On the synonymization of Acaulon longifolium Herrnst. & Heyn with Acaulon fontiquerianum Casas & Sérgio (Pottiaceae). Cryptogamie. Bryologie 42(18): 239–248. https://doi.org/10.5252/cryptogamie-bryologie2021v42a18
  • Nyholm E (1965) Illustrated Moss Flora of Fennoscandia. CWK Gleerup, Lund, Sweden, Volume 2.
  • Plášek V, Ochyra R (2020) Orthotrichum alpestre, a new addition to the moss flora of Poland, with notes on O. schimperi (Orthotrichaceae: Bryophyta). Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 89(3): e89310[1–16]. https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.89310
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Mark PVD, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck P (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  • Smith AJE (2001) The Moss Flora of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge University Press.
  • Suzuki TA (2016) Revised new catalog of the mosses of Japan. Hattoria 7: 9–223.
  • Trifinopoulos J, Nguyen LT, Von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2016) W-IQ-TREE: A fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 41(W1): W232–W235. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw256
  • Vigalondo B, Draper I, Mazimpaka V, Calleja JA, Lara F, Garilletii R (2020) The Lewinskya affinis complex (Orthotrichaceae) revisited: Species description and differentiation. The Bryologist 123(3): 454–481. https://doi.org/10.1639/0007-2745-123.3.454
  • Wolski GJ, Bihun M, Białecka B, Rewicz A (2020) SEM differences in sporophyte micromorphology of Plagiothecium nemorale and P. longisetum (Plagiotheciaceae, Bryophyta). Folia Cryptogamica Estonica 57: 49–58. https://doi.org/10.12697/fce.2020.57.07
  • Wolski GJ, Nour-El-Deen S, Cienkowska A, Bożyk D, El-Saadawi W (2021b) The genus Plagiothecium Schimp. (Plagiotheciaceae, Bryophyta) in Eurasia: an annotated checklist with distribution and ecological data. Plants 10(5): e868[1–37]. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10050868
  • Wynns JT, Munk KR, Lange CBA (2018) Molecular phylogeny of Plagiothecium and similar Hypnalean mosses, with a revised sectional classification of Plagiothecium. Cladistics 34(5): 469–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12210
  • Zuo Q, Higuchi M, Wang YF, Arikawa T, Hirayama Y (2011) The status of Struckia Müll.Hal. (Plagiotheciaceae, Bryopsida) inferred from multiple nuclear and chloroplast loci. Journal of Bryology 33(3): 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743282011Y.0000000015
login to comment