Short Communication |
Corresponding author: Bao-Huan Wu ( getupearly@126.com ) Academic editor: Alexander Sennikov
© 2022 Bao-Huan Wu, Da-Fang Cui, Ming Kang.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Wu B-H, Cui D-F, Kang M (2022) Nomenclature and taxonomic identities of Prunus zappeyana and P. zappeyana var. subsimplex (Rosaceae). PhytoKeys 190: 47-51. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.190.80490
|
The original specimens of both Prunus zappeyana and P. zappeyana var. subsimplex were found to belong to more than one taxon. In addition, P. zappeyana var. subsimplex was found to be invalid because, when the name was published, two separate descriptions were given to two cited collections, but not to the taxon, making the name unaccompanied with a description or diagnosis of this taxon (Art. 38.1 (a)). Therefore, a lectotype of P. zappeyana was designated under Art. 9.11 of ICN, by which P. zappeyana was placed in the synonymy of P. veitchii.
Cerasus, China, taxonomy, typification
Prunus subg. Cerasus (Mill.) A. Gray is a taxonomically complex group, commonly known as cherries (
In 1912,
To resolve the incongruence between these two taxonomic treatments, in this study, we investigated the nomenclature and the identities of P. zappeyana and P. zappeyana var. subsimplex with the reference to their protologues and original materials.
In the protologue of P. zappeyana,
Our examination of the original collections confirmed Koehne’s concern on the identities of the original collections, demonstrating that both the original specimens of P. zappeyana and P. zappeyana var. subsimplex represent at least two different taxa.
For P. zappeyana, we have successfully sorted out one sheet of Wilson 45 kept at A and two sheets of Wilson 70 kept at E and US. The specimen of Wilson 45 (A 00032250, Fig.
In the protologue,
For P. zappeyana var. subsimplex, we located one sheet each of Wilson 45a (A 00032252, Fig.
According to Art. 9.11 of ICN (
Either Wilson 45 or Wilson 70 can be chosen as the lectotype of P. zappeyana as they both correspond to the original description and match the diagnosis. We prefer to choose Wilson 45 over Wilson 70 as the lectotype of P. zappeyana for two reasons. First, as the identification of Wilson 70 remains taxonomically ambiguous, we prefer to choose Wilson 45 to make the identity of P. zappeyana more unambiguous. Second, we think Koehne apparently considered P. zappeyana and P. zappeyana var. subsimplex as belonging to the same species; and Wilson 45 and Wilson 45a are the nomenclatural elements which provide a common taxonomy to link these two names together, though the latter was not validly published.
Therefore, we chose the specimen of Wilson 45 as the lectotype of P. zappeyana and, furthermore, treated P. zappeyana as the synonym of P. veitchii, based on the lectotype. This decision deviates from the taxonomy of
Prunus veitchii
Type: China. Western Hubei, April 1900, E.H. Wilson 66 (lectotype designated by
= Prunus zappeyana Koehne, Pl. Wilson. (Sargent) 1(2): 221. 1912, syn. nov. Type: CHINA. Hubei Province: Badong (Patung) County, alt. 1000–1600 m, June 1907, E.H. Wilson 45 (lectotype designated here: A00032250!) (Fig.
For a full list of synonyms, descriptions and distribution of Prunus veitchii, see
This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC31370246) and the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB31000000). We are grateful to the curators of Herbaria A, E, US and SYS for access to the specimens and the images of specimens. We thank Dr Alexander Sennikov and one anonymous reviewer for their careful reviews.