Research Article
Print
Research Article
Molecular and morphological evidence for a new species of Pogostemon (Lamiaceae) from Hainan Island, China
expand article infoLangxing Yuan‡§, Gan Tan|, Wenhua Zhang|, Bine Xue, Jiwen Deng#, Lei Liu#, Gang Yao|
‡ Tropical Crops Genetic Resources Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, China
§ Haikou Duotan Wetlands Institute, Haikou, China
| South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
¶ Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, China
# Yinggeling Branch of Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park, Baisha, China

Corresponding author: Gang Yao ( gyao@scau.edu.cn )

Academic editor: Bo Li
© 2022 Langxing Yuan, Gan Tan, Wenhua Zhang, Bine Xue, Jiwen Deng, Lei Liu, Gang Yao.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation: Yuan L, Tan G, Zhang W, Xue B, Deng J, Liu L, Yao G (2022) Molecular and morphological evidence for a new species of Pogostemon (Lamiaceae) from Hainan Island, China. PhytoKeys 188: 177-191. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.188.76611
Open Access

Abstract

Pogostemon hainanensis, a new species of Lamiaceae from Hainan Island, China, is described. The phylogenetic position of the new species within Pogostemon was investigated based on analyses of the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (nrITS) and five plastid markers (viz. matK, psbA-trnH, rbcL, rsp16, trnL-F). The results show that P. hainanensis is supported to be a member of subgenus Pogostemon and is sister to P. parviflorus, a species widely distributed from Eastern Himalaya, through the Indo-China peninsula to China. Morphologically, the new species can be distinguished from all the other taxa of subgenus Pogostemon in having long petioles usually 4.5‒11.5 cm in length, and the calyx teeth 2/3 to subequal as long as the calyx tube. The new species differs from P. parviflorus further by its obviously double serrate leaf margin, spikes of inflorescence usually 2.5–8.0 cm long, calyx 4‒5 mm long and corolla 6–7 mm long.

Keywords

China, Lamiaceae, Pogostemon, Pogostemoneae, taxonomy

Introduction

Pogostemon Desf. is the largest genus in Pogostemoneae, Lamioideae, Lamiaceae (Zhao et al. 2021), and it is circumscribed recently in its broad sense that includes Pogostemon s.s. and Dysophylla Bl. (Yao et al. 2016; Zhao et al. 2021). The genus consists of more than 80 species distributed mainly in the tropical and subtropical Asia, and with five species endemic to Africa (Bhatti and Ingrouille 1997; Yao et al. 2015). The highest species diversity of the genus is found in the Indian subcontinent (Bhatti and Ingrouille 1997). Morphologically, the genus can be easily distinguished from other Pogostemoneae members by the presence of exserted stamens bearing moniliform hairs (Bhatti and Ingrouille 1997; Yao et al. 2015). Based on morphological and molecular evidence, the genus was divided into two subgenera, viz. subgenus Pogostemon and subgenus Dysophyllus (Bl.) Bhatti & Ingr. ex. G. Yao, Y.F. Deng & X.J. Ge (Yao et al. 2016). The former subgenus is characterized as perennial subshrubs, shrubs or rarely perennial herbs, spikes of inflorescence with more than two lateral branches, bracts and bracteoles large and usually broad-ovate, ovate or rarely lanceolate; while the latter subgenus is characterized as annual herbs or rarely perennial herbs or subshrubs, inflorescence a single terminal spike or rarely with two lateral branches, bracts and bracteoles small and narrow, and usually lanceolate, linear or filiform (Yao et al. 2016).

Based on results from extensive field investigations conducted recently, multiple new species of Pogostemon were reported, such as P. nudus Bongcheewin & Pramali from Thailand (Bongcheewin et al. 2017), P. guamensis Lorence & W.L. Wagner from Guam, Mariana Islands (Lorence et al. 2020), and P. monticola from Taiwan, China (Liu et al. 2021). In addition, the rare species P. dielsianus Dunn, which is endemic to southwestern China and known previously only from its type collected in 1905 (G. Forrest 875, E00087126, K000249619), was also rediscovered in a recent scientific field trip (Hu et al. 2021). Thus, extensive field investigations should be conducted and more new discoveries might be revealed, enabling better understanding of the biodiversity of the genus Pogostemon as well as for other biological groups.

In our taxonomic revision of Chinese Pogostemon (Yao et al. 2015), a specimen (Z. Huang 36483, IBSC-0585902) of Pogostemon collected in 1934 from Lingshui Hsien of Hainan Province, China, seemed to be very different from all the other congeneric taxa, especially in its large ratio of the length of calyx teeth and calyx tube (2/3 to ca. 1.0). However, due to the unavailability of intact leaves and flowers for measurements, the specimen was not further studied and the species that it represented was not included in our previous study (Yao et al. 2015). Recently, during a field investigation in Yinggeling Nature Reserve, Hainan Province, China, one of the authors (L.X. Yuan) collected a Pogostemon specimen that is very similar to the specimen Z. Huang 36483 in plant morphology. Later, another two wild populations of the same species were discovered in Jiaxi Nature Reserve and Qixianling, Hainan Province, China. Detailed morphological comparison and specimen examination confirmed that the newly collected specimens are conspecific with Z. Huang 36483 and the species is different from all the other Pogostemon taxa, thus it is formally described here. The phylogenetic position of the new species within Pogostemon is also studied here based on analyses of the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (nrITS) and five plastid regions (matK, psbA-trnH, rbcL, rps16, trnL-F).

Materials and methods

Morphological study

Specimens of Pogostemon deposited in the herbaria BM, E, HITBC, IBK, IBSC, K, KUN, L, PE, US, NAS, TAI and NY were studied carefully in the present study. Herbarium abbreviations cited in the present study follow the Index Herbariorum (Thiers 2013 onwards). Extensive field investigations of Chinese Pogostemon were conducted over the last decade. Morphological characters of stems, leaves, inflorescences, flowers and nutlets were photographed and measured.

Phylogenetic study

To study the phylogenetic position of the new species within the genus Pogostemon, a phylogenetic study of the genus was performed, based on analyses of six DNA markers (nrITS, matK, psbA-trnH, rbcL, rps16, trnL-F), following Yao et al. (2016). Total genomic DNA of the new species was extracted from silica gel-dried leaves (voucher specimens: L.X. Yuan 20210206001 & 20210207001; IBSC) using a Plant Genomic DNA Kit (Biomed, Shenzhen, China). Detailed information of primers of relevant DNA markers used in Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) amplification and sequencing, as well as the procedures of PCR, can be found in our previous study (Yao et al. 2016). All the DNA sequences used in Yao et al. (2016) and some Pogostemon sequences provided by other authors (Bendiksby et al. 2011; Hu et al. 2021) were downloaded from NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). In total, 57 accessions representing 35 species of Pogostemon were sampled, in which 34 accessions representing 16 species of subgenus Pogostemon and 23 accessions representing 19 species of subgenus Dysophyllus were included. Other nine genera of Pogostemoneae (viz., Achyrospermum Bl., Anisomeles R. Br., Colebrookea Sm., Comanthosphace S. Moore, Craniotome Rchb., Eurysolen Prain, Leucosceptrum Sm., Rostrinucula Kudô., Microtoena Prain), the genus Gomphostemma Wall. ex Benth. of Gomphostemmateae and the genus Colquhounia Wall. of Colquhounieae were selected here as outgroups based on phylogenetic framework provided by Yao et al. (2016). Detailed information of all species sampled and sequences used are available in Appendix I.

All the DNA sequences were aligned using MAFFT 7.221 (Katoh and Standley 2013), and then three different datasets were constructed: the cpDNA dataset (including matK, psbA-trnH, rbcL, rps16, trnL-F), the nrITS dataset, and the combined dataset (including all the six DNA markers). All the three datasets were analyzed using two approaches: Bayesian Inference (BI) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) were conducted using MrBayes v. 3.2.7a (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003) and RAxML (Stamatakis 2006) on the CIPRES cluster (Miller et al. 2010), respectively. The models of nucleotide substitution of the six DNA markers used were selected independently under the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) using jModeTest v. 3.7 (Posada 2008): GTR+I+Γ for nrITS, GTR+Γ for matK, TrN+Γ for psbA-trnH, GTR+I for rbcL, TVM+Γ for rps16 and GTR+I for trnL-F. Detailed methods for BI and ML analyses could refer to the phylogenetic study conducted in Yao et al. (2021), except that each of Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis was run for 10,000,000 generations and sampling every 500 generations in BI analysis. Number of generations in BI analysis was sufficient, because the effective sample size (ESS) of all parameters were over 200 as evaluated in Tracer v. 1.6 (Rambaut et al. 2014), and the average standard deviations (SD) of split frequencies for the dataset was below 0.01. The first 25% of the trees obtained in BI analysis were discarded as burn-in and then posterior probabilities (PP) were determined from the posterior distribution. A rapid bootstrap (BS) analysis using the model GTR+Γ with 1000 pseudoreplicates was conducted to obtain the support values in ML analysis.

Results

Phylogenetic analyses

The cpDNA dataset, nrITS dataset and combined dataset alignments contained 3872 bp, 707 bp and 4,579 bp, respectively. The topology of Pogostemon and its relatives derived from the nrITS dataset was largely consistent with that derived from the cpDNA dataset, except several nodes that were lowly supported (defined here as BS < 80% or PP < 0.80) (Suppl. material 1 and 2). Phylogenetic relationships derived from the combined dataset (Figure 1) were much better resolved compared with those obtained from both the cpDNA dataset and nrITS dataset (Suppl. material 1 and 2), thus we focus on describing phylogenetic relationships based on the result derived from the combined dataset.

Figure 1. 

Maximum likelihood (ML) tree of Pogostemon and its relatives inferred from the combined dataset (including nrITS, matK, psbA-trnH, rbcL, rps16, trnL-F). Bootstrap (BS) value in ML analysis and posterior probility (PP) in Bayesian inference (BI) is indicated on the left and right of slanting bar associated with phylogenetic node, respectively. Dashes denote that the phylogenetic node associated was not supported or the BS value is < 50% in ML anlaysis or PP < 0.50 in BI. The crown node of Pogostemon is show by the arrowhead.

Results from analyses of the combined dataset recovered a highly supported (defined here as BS ≥ 90% or PP ≥ 0.99) sister relationship between the two genera Anisomeles and Pogostemon (BS = 100%, PP = 1.00). Phylogenetic relationships of the genus Pogostemon obtained here are also consistent with those reported in Yao et al. (2016). In Pogostemon, two major clades were highly supported: Clade I representing the subgenus Pogostemon (BS = 100%, PP = 1.00) and clade II representing the subgenus Dysophyllus (BS = 98%, PP = 1.00) (Fig. 1). The monophyly of the new species is well-supported (BS = 100%, PP = 1.00) and it is nested deeply within the first clade. Furthermore, a sister relationship between the new species and P. parviflorus Benth. is moderately supported (defined here as 80% ≤ BS < 90% or 0.80 ≤ PP < 0.99) in ML analysis (BS = 86%) and highly supported in BI analysis (PP = 1.00). Detailed information about the phylogenetic relationships of other nodes can be referred to Figure 1.

Morphological comparison

A detailed morphological comparison between the new species and other species of Pogostemon was conducted. A series of morphological characters of the new species, such as the obviously double serrated leaf margin (Figs 2, 3A–D), long petioles (usually 4.5‒11.5 cm long; Fig. 3B–D), and the large ratio of the length of calyx teeth and calyx tube (2/3–1.0; Fig. 3J‒K), can be used to distinguish the new species from all the other members of subgenus Pogostemon easily. In habit, the new species is similar to P. parviflorus Benth. and P. septentrionalis C.Y. Wu & Y.C. Huang, which also have wild populations discovered in South China (Yao et al. 2015). However, the new species further differs from P. parviflorus in having large spikes of inflorescence (usually 2.5‒8 cm long and 9‒12 mm wide; Fig. 3A, E), larger calyx (4‒5 mm long; Figure 3J) and corolla (6‒7 mm long), besides above-mentioned three traits. In contrast, P. parviflorus has obscurely or shallowly double crenated to double serrated leaves margin, shorter petioles (1‒4.5 cm long), smaller spikes of inflorescence (1‒4.5 cm long and 8‒10 mm wide), calyx (4‒4.2 mm long) and corolla (4‒4.5 mm long), as well as the ratio of the length of calyx teeth and calyx tube (less than 1/2) (Yao et al. 2015). While P. septentrionalis has shorter petioles (0.5‒5.5cm long), narrow spikes of inflorescence (7‒9 mm in diameter), smaller calyx (3‒4 mm long) and corolla (4‒4.5 mm long), the ratio of the length of calyx teeth and calyx tube (1/3‒1/2), and larger nutlets (0.9‒1.0 mm long) (Yao et al. 2015).

Figure 2. 

Habit of Pogostemon hainanensis.

Only two species of subgenus Pogostemon [viz., P. cablin (Blanco) Benth. and P. esquirolii (H. Léveillé) C. Y. Wu & Y. C. Huang] were recorded previously in Hainan Island, China (Guangdong Institute of Botany 1977; Wu and Huang 1977). While the specific name P. esquirolii had been reduced previously to be a synonym of P. glaber Bentham by Rehder (1935), and this treatment was accepted by Yao et al. (2015) in their taxonomic revision of Chinese Pogostemon. The new species can be distinguished from P. cablin (a cultivated species in China) (Yao et al. 2015) by a series of morphological traits, such as its spikes of inflorescences are 9‒12 mm in diameter (Fig. 3A, E) (vs. 13‒18 mm in diameter), calyx 4‒5 mm long (Fig. 3J‒K) (vs. 6‒8 mm long), the ratio of the length of calyx teeth and calyx tube is 2/3‒1.0 (Figure 3J‒K) (vs. ca. 1/4). While the new species differs from P. glaber by its leaves margin obviously double serrate (Figs 2, 3A‒D) (vs. usually shallowly double serrate or double crenate), spikes of inflorescences usually 2.5–8.0 cm long (Fig. 3A, E) (vs. 3.0–15.0 cm long), calyx 4‒5 mm long (Figure 3J‒K) (vs. 3‒4.5 mm long), the ratio of the length of calyx teeth and calyx tube is 2/3‒1.0 (Fig. 3J‒K) (vs. ca. 1/3), corolla 6–7 mm long (vs. 3–5.5 mm long).

Figure 3. 

Pogostemon hainanensis A branch B leaf C, D leaf E spike of inflorescence F stem G cross section of stem H bract (the left one) and bracteoles (the right two) I, J flower K calyx L nutlets.

A detailed morphological comparison among the new species and its relatives or morphologically similar species also can be referred to Table 1.

Table 1.
Download as
CSV
XLSX

Morphological comparison among Pogostemon glaber Bentham, P. hainanensis L.X. Yuan & Gang Yao, P. parviflorus Bentham and P. septentrionalis Wu & Huang.

Morphology P. glaber P. hainanensis P. parviflorus P. septentrionalis
Leaf blade Margin shallowly double serrate or double crenate Margin obviously double serrate Margin obscurely double crenate to double serrate Margin double serrate
Petiole Usually 3–5 cm long Usually 4.5‒11.5 cm long Usually 1–4.5 cm long Usually 0.5–5.5 cm long
Inflorescence Usually 3.0–15.0 cm long and 6‒10 mm wide Usually 2.5–8.0 cm long and 9‒12 mm wide Usually 0.7–3.5 cm long and 8–10 mm wide Usually 3–13 cm long and 7–9 mm wide
Calyx 3‒4.5 mm long; the ratio of the length of calyx teeth and calyx tube is ca. 1/3 4‒5 mm long; the ratio of the length of calyx teeth and calyx tube is 2/3‒1.0 4‒4.2 mm long; the ratio of the length of calyx teeth and calyx tube is less than 1/2 3–4 mm long; the ratio of the length of calyx teeth and calyx tube is 1/3–1/2
Corolla 3–5.5 mm long 6–7 mm long 4‒4.5 mm long 4–4.5 mm long

Discussion

Morphologically, the new species has spikes of inflorescence with more than two later branches (Figs 2, 3A), bracts and bracteoles large and broad-ovate, ovate or lanceolate in shape (Fig. 3H), indicating that the species is a member of subgenus Pogostemon, which is further confirmed in phylogenetic analyses (Figure 1). According to current circumscription, about 28 species (including the new species) are accepted in subgenus Pogostemon (Bhatti and Ingrouille 1997; Yao et al. 2015; Liu et al. 2021), among which 16 species were sampled in the present phylogenetic analyses (Figure 1). The species Pogostemon monticola T.C. Hsu, S.W. Chung, S.H. Liu & W.J. Huang described recently from Taiwan, China, was not sampled in the present phylogenetic study due to the unavailability of DNA material or DNA sequences, but its phylogenetic position within subgenus Pogostemon was resolved and it was closely related to P. formosanus Oliver and P. septentrionalis Wu & Huang (Liu et al. 2021). While for the other 11 species of subgenus Pogostemon not sampled in the present phylogenetic analyses, viz. P. cristatus Hassk., P. griffithii Prain, P. hispidus Prain, P. latifolius (C.Y. Wu & Y.C. Huang) Gang Yao, P. nelsonii Doan, P. nepetoides Stapf, P. pubescens Benth., P. purpurascens Dalzell, P. tuberculosus Benth., P. villosus Benth., and P. wattii C.B. Clarke, they also have a series of morphological characters that can be distinguished from the new species from Hainan, China, especially in terms of the margin of leaves, the length of petioles, the size of calyx and the ratio of the length of calyx teeth and calyx tube. Detailed information about the morphological characters of these 11 species can be referred in Bhatti and Ingrouille (1997) and Yao et al. (2015). Thus, as mentioned above, the combined evidence from morphological and phylogenetic analyses well supported the independently taxonomic status of the new species in Pogostemon.

Taxonomic treatment

Pogostemon hainanensis L.X. Yuan & Gang Yao, sp. nov.

urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77248974-1
Figures 2, 3

Diagnosis

The species is similar to Pogostemon parviflorus Benth. in general morphology, but differs from the latter by its leaves margin obviously double serrate, petioles usually 4.5‒11.5 cm long, spikes of inflorescence up to 8 cm long, calyx 4‒5 mm long, corolla 6–7 mm long, and the calyx teeth is 2/3 to subequal as long as the calyx tube.

Type

China. Hainan province, Yinggeling Nature Reserve, Nanleshan, Fanyang, Wuzhishan, 18°54'38.25"N, 109°22'26.58"E, at an elevation of about 570 m, 6 February 2021, L.X. Yuan 20210206001 (holotype, IBSC; isotypes: IBSC, KUN).

Description

Perennial herbs or shrubs, 0.8–2 m tall. Stem erect, 6–8 mm in diameter, 4-angular, slightly dilated at nodes, a few branched, strigose, or villous at the upper part. Leaves opposite; blade ovate, rarely ovate-lanceolate, (5.5–) 9–13.5 × (2.5) 6.5–10.5 cm, papery or membranous, strigose on both surfaces, base broadly cuneate, margin obviously double serrate, entire at base, apex acuminate; midvein elevated abaxially, lateral vein 3–4 (rarely 5) pairs on each side of the midvein, slightly elevated abaxially; petioles (1.5–) 4–11.5 cm long, ca. 1 mm in diameter, strigose. Spikes of inflorescence (1.0–) 2.5–8.0(–10.5) cm long, 9–12 mm in diameter, terminal and axillary, interrupted basally in long spikes, usually with more than two lateral branches; peduncle (1–) 2–4 cm long, densely villous; verticillasters many-flowered, flowers sessile. Bracts oblong, 5–13 × 2.5–5 mm, strigose, midvein elevated abaxially, lateral vein 1–2 pairs on each side of the midvein or sometimes obscure; bracteoles ovate-lanceolate to narrowly lanceolate, 2.5–5 × 0.7–1.8 mm, strigose. Calyx tubular-inflated, 4–5 mm long, 5-veined, strigose and sparsely golden glandular outside, sometimes sparsely strigillose inside at the upper part of tube; teeth 5, narrowly triangular, equal, 1.8–2 mm long, 0.6–0.8 mm wide at base, 2/3 to subequal as long as the calyx tube, subglabours or strigillose inside. Corolla white, 6–7 mm long, exserted evidently from calyx, 2-lipped, upper lip 3-lobed, lower lip entire. Stamens 4, erect, much exserted from corolla; filaments 7–7.5 mm long, all inserted at a height of ca. 2 mm in the tube, bearded at middle, bearded portion exserted; anther 1-locular, cell apex dehiscent. Style 7–7.5 mm long; stigma bifid, lobes subequal, 1.2–1.7 mm long. Disc ca. 0.6 mm long. Nutlets 4, ca. 0.7 × ca. 0.6 mm long, ellipsoid or slightly depressed globose, abaxially slightly flat, adaxially ribbed, black or dark brown.

Etymology

Pogostemon hainanensis is named after its type locality, Hainan province, China.

Phenology

Flowering from December to the next February and fruiting from January to April.

Paratype

China. Hainan Province, Lingshui Hsien, 12 January 1934, near river, Z. Huang 36483 (IBSC-0585902!); Ledong Hsien, Jiaxi Nature Reserve, 18°52'35.85"N, 109°10'36.99"E, at an elevation of about 800 m, 7 February 2021, L.X. Yuan 20210207001 (IBSC); Baoting Hsien, near the Tiantan waterfall, 18°42'16.17"N, 109°41'50.55"E, at an elevation of about 560 m, 25 April 2021, L.X. Yuan 20210425001 (IBSC).

Distribution and habit

The new species is endemic to Hainan Province, China (Figure 4). It grows under forests, usually near ravines, at an elevation of 550–800 m.

Figure 4. 

Distribution of Pogostemon hainanense (red circular).

Chinese name

Hai Nan Ci Rui Cao (海南刺蕊草).

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to the curators of the herbaria BM, E, HITBC, IBK, IBSC, K, KUN, L, PE, US, NAS, TAI and NY for providing specimen images or hosting our visits. This study was financially supported by the Project of Species Resource Protection of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (Grant No. 13210201) and the Forestry Scientific Technology Innovation Project of Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2020KJCX010).

References

  • Bendiksby M, Thorbek L, Scheen AC, Lindqvist C, Ryding O (2011) An updated phylogeny and classification of Lamiaceae subfamily Lamioideae. Taxon 60(2): 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.602015
  • Bhatti GR, Ingrouille M (1997) Systematics of Pogostemon (Labiatae). Bulletin of the Natural History Museum. London (Botany) 27: 77–147.
  • Bongcheewin B, Pramali K, Traiperm P, Chantaranothai P, Paton A (2017) Pogostemon nudus sp. nov. (Lamiaceae) from Thailand. Nordic Journal of Botany 35(3): 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.01439
  • Guangdong Institute of Botany (1977) Flora Hainanica 4. Science Press, Beijing, 644 pp.
  • Hu GX, Su T, An MT, Wan XY (2021) Rediscovery of Pogostemon dielsianus (Lamiaceae, Lamioideae), a rare endemic species from southwestern China, after one century. PhytoKyes 171: 61–73. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.171.60389
  • Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(4): 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
  • Lorence DH, Wagner WL, Wood KR, Johnson G (2020) Pogostemon guamensis Lorence & W.L. Wagner (Lamiaceae), a new species from Guam, Mariana Islands. PhytoKeys 169: 61–73. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.169.58107
  • Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetics trees. Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE). New Orleans, LA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129
  • Rehder A (1935) Notes on the lLigneous plants described by Leveille from Eastern Asia. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 16(3): 311–340. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.324579
  • Thiers B (2013, continuously updated) Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. The New York Botanical Garden, New York. http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/ [accessed 13 October 2021]
  • Wu CY, Huang YC (1977) Pogostemon and Dysophylla. In: Wu CY, Li HW (Eds) Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae 66. Science Press, Beijing, 366–387.
  • Yao G, Drew BT, Yi TS, Yan HF, Yuan YM, Ge XJ (2016) Phylogenetic relationships, character evolution and biogeographic diversification of Pogostemon s.l. (Lamiaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 98: 184–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.01.020
  • Yao G, Xue B, Liu K, Li Y, Huang J, Zhai J (2021) Phylogenetic estimation and morphological evolution of Alsineae (Caryophyllaceae) shed new insight into the taxonomic status of the genus Pseudocerastium. Plant Diversity 43(4): 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2020.11.001
  • Zhao F, Chen YP, Salmaki Y, Drew BT, Wilson TC, Scheen AC, Celep F, Bräuchler C, Bendiksby M, Wang Q, Min D-Z, Peng H, Olmstead RG, Li B, Xiang C-L (2021) An updated tribal classification of Lamiaceae based on plastome phylogenomics. BMC Biology 19(1): e2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-020-00931-z

Appendix I

Sequences and taxa information for all samples used in the present study (–, missing data; *, newly-generated sequences). Accession numbers are given for nrITS, matK, rbcL, rps16, trnH-psbA, trnL-F (c-f or c-d/e-f; the characters “c”, “d”, “e” and “f” indicate different primers used for PCR and sequencing of the marker trnL-F, referred from Yao et al. 2016).

Pogostemon amaranthoides Benth._28: –, KR608424, KR608489, KR608613, KR608548, KR608676; P. amaranthoides_42: KR608745, KR608425, KR608490, KR608614, KR608549, KR608677; P. aquaticus (C. H. Wright) Press_839: KR608767, KR608468, KR608527, KR608655, KR608592, KR608717; P. auricularius (L.) Hassk._8: KR608761, KR608451, KR608513, KR608638, KR608575, KR608700; P. barbatus Bhatti & Ingr._33: KR608762, KR608452, KR608514, KR608639, KR608576, KR608701; P. barbatus_118: KR608763, KR608453, KR608515, KR608640, KR608577, KR608702; P. benghalensis (Burm. f.) Kuntze: –, KR608444, –, HQ911592, KR608568, HQ911663/HQ911731; P. brachystachyus Benth._2: KR608775, KR608455, KR608517, KR608642, KR608579, KR608704; P. brachystachyus_12: KR608774, KR608454, KR608516, KR608641, KR608578, KR608703; P. cablin (Blanco) Benth._37: KR608757, KR608438, KR608503, KR608627, KR608562, KR608690; P. cablin _38: KR608752, KR608439, KR608504, KR608628, KR608563, KR608691; P. cablin_44: KR608753, KR608440, KR608505, KR608629, KR608564, KR608692; P. cablin_45: KR608754, KR608441, KR608506, KR608630, KR608565, KR608693; P. cablin_46: KR608755, KR608442, KR608507, KR608631, KR608566, KR608694; P. cablin_47: KR608756, KR608443, KR608508, KR608632, KR608567, KR608695; P. chinensis C. Y. Wu & Y. C.Huang_31: KR608743, KR608426, KR608491, KR608615, KR608550, KR608678; P. chinensis_117: KR608742, KR608449, KR608512, KR608637, KR608573, KR608699; P. crassicaulis (Benth.) Press_15: KR608770, KR608469, KR608528, KR608656, KR608593, KR608718; P. cruciatus (Benth.) Kuntze_25: KR608771, KR608466, KR608525, KR608653, KR608590, KR608715; P. dielsianus Dunn: MW194872, –, MW194874, MW194875, MW194873, MW194876; P. elsholtzioides Benth._63: –, KR608445, –, KR608633, KR608569, KR608720; P. formosanus Oliver_62: KR608744, KR608434, KR608499, KR608623, KR608558, KR608686; P. formosanus_90: KR608779, KR608435, KR608500, KR608624, KR608559, KR608687; P. fraternus Miq.: KR608781, KR608461, –, KR608648, KR608585, KR608710; P. gardner Hook. f._1: MF303612, MF303632, –, –, –, –; P. gardner_2: MF303603, MF303622, –, –, –, –; P. glaber Benth._3: KR608740, KR608431, KR608496, KR608620, KR608555, KR608683; P. glaber_13: KR608739, KR608429, KR608494, KR608618, KR608553, KR608681; P. glaber_214: KR608741, KR608430, KR608495, KR608619, KR608554, KR608682; P. hainanensis L.X. Yuan & Gang Yao_YG268: OL625022, OL616075, OL616077, OL616079, OL616081, OL616083; P. hainanensis_YG282: OL625023, OL616076, OL616078, OL616080, OL616082, OL616084; P. heyneanus Benth._1: KR608751, KR608427, KR608492, KR608616, KR608551, KR608679; P. heyneanus_2: –, HQ911401, –, FJ854069, –, FJ854297/FJ854184; P. hirsutus Benth.: –, HQ911397, –, FJ854070, –, FJ854298/FJ854185; P. hispidocalyx C. Y. Wu & Y. C. Huang_26: KR608780, KR608457, –, KR608644, KR608581, KR608706; P. linearis (Benth.) Kuntze_5: KR608764, KR608462, KR608521, KR608649, KR608586, KR608711; P. linearis_108: KR608765, KR608463, KR608522, KR608650, KR608587, KR608712; P. litigiosus Doan ex Suddee & A. J. Paton_53: KR608776, KR608458, KR608519, KR608645, KR608582, KR608707; P. litigiosus_54: KR608777, KR608459, KR608520, KR608646, KR608583, KR608708; P. macgregorii W. W. Sm._99: KR608778, –, –, –, –, –; P. paniculatus (Willd.) Benth._1: –, KR608450, –, –, KR608574, KR608721; P. paniculatus_2: –, HQ911399, –, FJ854071, –, FJ854299/FJ854186; P. parviflorus Benth._18: KR608749, KR608436, KR608501, KR608625, KR608560, KR608688; P. parviflorus_19: KR608750, KR608437, KR608502, KR608626, KR608561, KR608689; P. petelotii Doan ex G. Yao, Y. F. Deng & X. J. Ge_41: KR608772, KR608470, KR608529, KR608657, KR608594, KR608719; P. plectranthoides Desf._74: KR608760, KR608446, KR608509, KR608634, KR608570, KR608696; P. plectranthoides_109: KR608758, KR608447, KR608510, KR608635, KR608571, KR608697; P. plectranthoides_110: KR608759, KR608448, KR608511, KR608636, KR608572, KR608698; P. quadrifolius (Benth.) F. Muell._100: KR608773, KR608456, KR608518, KR608643, KR608580, KR608705; P. rogersii N E. Br.: KR608782, KR608460, –, KR608647, KR608584, KR608709; P. sampsonii (Hance) Press_11: KR608769, KR608465, KR608524, KR608652, KR608589, KR608714; P. septentrionalis C. Y. Wu & Y. C. Huang_39: KR608747, KR608432, KR608497, KR608621, KR608556, KR608684; P. septentrionalis_40: KR608748, KR608433, KR608498, KR608622, KR608557, KR608685; P. stellatus (Lour.) Kuntze_851: KR608768, KR608464, KR608523, KR608651, KR608588, KR608713; P. wightii Benth.: MF303601, MF303620, –, –, –, –; P. xanthiifolius C. Y. Wu & Y. C. Huang_27: KR608746, KR608428, KR608493, KR608617, KR608552, KR608680; P. yatabeanus (Makino) Press_48: KR608766, KR608467, KR608526, KR608654, KR608591, KR608716;

Outgroups: Achyrospermum africanum Hook. f. ex Baker: –, HQ911418, –, FJ853999, –, FJ854246/FJ854133; A. carvalhoi Gürke: –, HQ911412, –, FJ854001, –, FJ854248/FJ854135; A. cryptanthum Baker: –, HQ911415, –, FJ854002, –, FJ854249/FJ854136; A. wallichianum (Benth.) Benth. ex Hook. f.: –, –, –, HQ911594, –, HQ911666/HQ911734; Anisomeles heyneana Benth.: –, HQ911394, –, HQ911589, –, HQ911659/HQ911727; A. indica (L.) Kuntze_55: KR608726, KR608406, KR608471, KR608595, KR608530, KR608658; A. indica_115: –, KR608407, KR608472, KR608596, KR608531, KR608659; A. indica_116: KR608727, KR608408, KR608473, KR608597, KR608532, KR608660; A. indica_119: KR608728, KR608409, KR608474, KR608598, KR608533, KR608661; A. malabarica (L.) R. Br. ex Sims: –, HQ911396, –, FJ854013, –, FJ854260/FJ854147; Colebrookea oppositifolia Sm._21: KR608732, KR608414, KR608479, KR608603, KR608538, KR608666; C. oppositifolia_22: KR608733, KR608415, KR608480, KR608604, KR608539, KR608667; C. oppositifolia_23: KR608734, KR608416, KR608481, KR608605, KR608540, KR608668; Comanthosphace japonica (Miq.) S. Moore: –, HQ911407, –, FJ854029, –, FJ854272/FJ854159; C. stellipila S. Moore: –, HQ911408, –, FJ854030, –, FJ854273/FJ854160; Craniotome furcate (Link) Kuntze_1: KR608730, KR608412, KR608477, KR608601, KR608536, KR608664; C. furcate_6: KR608731, KR608413, KR608478, KR608602, KR608537, KR608665; Eurysolen gracilis Prain_16: KR608735, KR608417, KR608482, KR608606, KR608541, KR608669; E. gracilis_17: KR608736, KR608418, KR608483, KR608607, KR608542, KR608670; Leucosceptrum canum Sm._4: KR608738, KR608419, KR608484, KR608608, KR608543, KR608671; L. canum_20: KR608737, KR608420, KR608485, KR608609, KR608544, KR608672; Microtoena sp._9: KR608729, KR608410, KR608475, KR608599, KR608534, KR608662; M.> sp._10: –, KR608411, KR608476, KR608600, KR608535, KR608663; Rostrinucula dependens (Rehder) Kudô: –, HQ911405, –, FJ854074, –, FJ854302/FJ854189; R. sinensis (Hemsl.) C. Y. Wu: –, HQ911406, –, FJ854075, –, FJ854303/FJ854190; Colquhounia coccinea Wall._14: KR608722, KR608421, KR608486, KR608610, KR608545, KR608673; Gomphostemma sp._113: KR608723, KR608422, KR608487, KR608611, KR608546, KR608674; G. sp._114: KR608724, KR608423, KR608488, KR608612, KR608547, KR608675.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1 

Figure S1

Langxing Yuan, Gan Tan, Wenhua Zhang, Bine Xue, Jiwen Deng, Lei Liu, Gang Yao

Data type: Phylogenetic tree

Explanation note: Supplementary Figure 1 Maximum likelihood (ML) tree of Pogostemon and its relatives inferred from the cpDNA dateset (including matK, psbA-trnH, rbcL, rps16, trnL-F).

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (1.14 MB)
Supplementary material 2 

Figure S2

Langxing Yuan, Gan Tan, Wenhua Zhang, Bine Xue, Jiwen Deng, Lei Liu, Gang Yao

Data type: Phylogenetic tree

Explanation note: Supplementary Figure 2 Maximum likelihood (ML) tree of Pogostemon and its relatives inferred from the nrlTS dataset.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (1.06 MB)
login to comment