Research Article
Research Article
Morphology of pollen in Ferula genus (Apiaceae)
expand article infoBirol Başer, Mehmet Sagıroglu§, Gulden Dogan|, Hayri Duman
‡ Bitlis Eren University, Bitlis, Turkey
§ Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey
| Firat University, Elazig, Turkey
¶ Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
Open Access


In this study, the pollen morphology of all Ferula species distributed throughout the country of Turkey was studied with light and scanning electron microscopy for the first time. The aim is to identify the pollen morphological characteristics of 23 Ferula species. The pollen is radially symmetrical, isopolar and tricolporate in all examined species. Pollen grains are prolate and perprolate with the polar axis ranging from 22.28 to 40.47 µm and the equatorial axis from 13.70 to 18.73 µm. Their polar shapes are triangular, triangular to subtriangular and circular to subcircular. Several types of exine ornamentations have been observed on pollen through the use of scanning electron microscopy. The dendrogram constructed by using Average Linkage of the examined data revealed two main groups. It was determined that some pollen characteristics are more useful for classification than others. In particular, P, E, the ratio of P/E (pollen shape) and ornamentation in the polar and equatorial views are the most valuable variables for discrimination the Ferula species.


Apiaceae, Ferula, LM, pollen morphology, SEM, Turkey


Apiaceae is one of the largest plant families in the world. Apiaceae comprise approximately 450 genera and 3700 species, chiefly in north temperate regions (Pimenov and Leonov 2004).

The largest centere of biodiversity for this family in Asian countries is Turkey, with about 160 endemic species included in 44 genera (Bilgili et al. 2016). These family members are of considerable economic importance as food, flavouring and ornamental plants.

The genus Ferula is a very important pharmaceutical plant of the Apiaceae family. There are different opinions about the taxonomy on the subfamily, tribe, genus and species of Apiaceae as the taxonomic system of Apiaceae is based on the typical umbrella anthotaxy and its fruit with specific secretory tube. Ferula is traditionally classified in the tribe Peucedaneae and six subgenera are recognised with in the genus (Pimenov and Leonov 1993; Korovin 1947). However, serological studies by Shneyer et al. (1995) indicated the distant position of Ferula from all other genera of traditionally delimited Paucedaneae. Ferula species are typically tall perennials or biennials with stout stems and finely divided leaves with inflated sheaths. Morphological charactereristics of the basal leaves and mature fruits are necessary for the accurate identification of the species (Kurzyna-Młynik et al. 2008).

The chemical constituents of plants in the genus Ferula (Umbelliferea) have been fairly thoroughly studied, with the most common compounds being sesquiterpenes and sesquiterpene coumarins. As such, many members of the genus have been used in China for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and stomach diseases. Modern pharmacological studies have established the anti-ulcerative, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory and immunopharmacological activities of this genus (Yang et al. 2006; Li et al. 2014).

Globally, the genus Ferula L. (Apiaceae) contains 180–185 species, with the most diversity found in Central and Southwest Asia (Pimenov and Leonov 2004). In Turkey, about 130 species can be found, of which approximately 100 are endemic (Korovin 1951; Chamberlain and Rechinger 1987). The first revision of Ferula in Turkey was prepared by Peşmen (Peşmen 1972), where18 species were recognised, one of which was incompletely known and nine of which were endemic (Sağıroğlu and Duman 2008). A comprehensive revision of Turkish Ferula has been undertaken by Sağıroğlu since 2005 and a large number of specimens have been collected from all over Turkey. Four new species have since been added to the Flora of Turkey and one was made a synonym (Duman and Sağıroğlu 2005; Sağıroğlu and Duman 2006; Sağıroğlu and Duman 2007; Sağıroğlu and Duman 2010; Sağıroğlu and Duman 2014). F. divaricata and F. pisidica were published by Pimenov and Akalın (Pimenov and Kljuykov 2013; Akalın et al. 2020). According to recent studies, the Ferula genus includes 23 species, of which 14 species are endemic (Güner et al. 2012).

Pollen morphology of various members of the family Umbelliferae has been studied over time. For example, Erdtman (1952) studied pollen morphology of the family Umbelliferae, while Ting (1961) examined pollen of some American species of family Umbelliferae. Additionally, Ting et al. (1964) examined pollen morphology of the subfamily Hydrocotyloideae: Umbelliferae. Pollen morphology of the North European Flora of the family Umbelliferae was examined by Punt (1984). However, the most comprehensive study on pollen morphology of family Umbelliferae is that of Cerceau-Larrival (1971, 1981). Van Zeist et al. (1977) described the following pollen types from Iran: Anisosciadium, Bunium, Eryngium, Ferula, Malabaila, Pimpinella, Sium erectum, and Turgenia types. Pollen morphology of the family has also been studied by Erdtman et al. 1961, 1969; Visset 1972; Faegri and Iversen 1975; Nilsson et al. 1977; Moore and Webb 1978; Nigaud 1977, 1980; Punt 1984; Perveen and Qaiser 2006. Descriptions by several authors have been given in regional pollen floras (Aytuğ et al. 1971; Kuprianova and Alyshina 1972; Punt 1984; Perveen and Qaiser 2006; Punt et al. 2007; Güner et al. 2011; Pehlivan et al. 2009; Mungan et al. 2011; Baldemir et al. 2018), but only a few studies have been conducted on the genus Ferula.

To date, no information is available on the pollen morphology of species of Ferula found in Turkey. In the present study, an attempt has been made to provide complete information on pollen morphology of these genera in Turkey. For all 23 taxa belonging to the genus Ferula, pollen morphology was examined from samples which were collected from their natural habitat. This research is a palynological study of Ferula, collected from different regions in Turkey and was conducted to shed light on the properties of the pollen taxa that were examined. The present research aims to provide detailed quantitative and qualitative data on the pollen morphology of the genus, as well as to evaluate the taxonomic value of those data.

Materials and methods

Plant material

The material used for this study was collected from various locations throughout Turkey during the year 2018. The voucher specimens were deposited in the herbarium of Sakarya University and the Faculty of Science of Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey (GAZI). Plant localities, collection dates and collector numbers can all be seen in Table 1.

Table 1.

List of taxa examined, localities and collector.

Taxa Locality Collector
F. szowitsiana D.C. B6 Sivas: Zara road, 13. km, 1300 m, 14.06.2018 M.S 6859
F. drudeana Korovin C5 Kayseri: Yahyalı, Faraşa Village, 1550 m, 10.06.2018 M.S 6854
F. coskunii H. Duman & M. Sağıroğlu C6 Hatay: Hatay-Yayla Mountain, 1200 m, 15.07.2018 M.S 6881
F. mervynii M.Sağıroğlu & H. Duman A9 Erzurum: Uzundere-Artvin road, Dam vicinity 27.07.2018 M.S 6885
F. communis L. A6 Samsun: Samsun-Ankara road, Samsun output, 50 m, 03.05.2018 M.S 6829
F. tingitana L. C1 Izmir: Efes ruins, 18.05.2018 M.S 6833
F. duranii M.Sağıroğlu & H. Duman C3 Antalya: Alanya castle, 40 m, 30.05.2018 M.S 6844
F. lycia Boiss. B4 Konya: Hadim-Bozkır road, 54. km, 1050 m, 29.05.2018 M.S 6842
F. hermonis Boiss. C6 Adana: Between Gürümze-Feke, 1600 m, 12.06.2018 M.S 6857
F. anatolica Boiss. B2 Manisa: Alaşehir, Kozluca Village, 1000 m, 25.05.2018 M.S 6836
F. orientalis L. B7 Elazig: Elazig-Diyarbakir road, 62. km, 1250 m, 17.06.2018 M.S 6869
F. brevipedicellata Peşmen ex M. Sağıroğlu & H. Duman B9 Bitlis: Hizan-Pervari road, 26. km, 1000 m, 15.06.2018 M.S 6861
F. halophila Peşmen B4: Tuz Lake, islands, 908 m, 02.06.2018 M.S 6846
F. parva Freyn & Bornm. C4 Konya: Karaman-Mut road, 5. km, 1130 m, 16.07.2018 M.S 3175
F. tenuissima Hub.-Mor. & Peşmen C6 Osmaniye: Zorkun Plateau, 5. km, 1600 m, 15.07.2018 M.S 6880
F. haussknechtii Wolff ex Rech. B9 Bitlis: Between Tatvan-Van, 66. km, 1950 m, 15.06.2018 M.S 6862
F. elaeochytris Korovin C5: Nigde-Ulukışla, Alihoca-Maden villages between, 1500 m, 04.06.2018 M.S 6850
F. longipedunculata Peşmen B6 Maraş: Maraş-Göksün, Keklikoluk Village, Işık Mountain, 1900 m, 18.06.2018 M.S 6872
F. divaricata Pimenov B3: Eskişehir-Sivrihisar yolu, Beylikova road, 920 m, 19.06.2018 M.S 4542
F. huber-morathii Peşmen B8 Bingöl: Elazig-Bingöl road, Yolçatı, 1300 m, 16.06.2018 M.S 6864
F. caspica Bieb. A4Ankara: Ankara-Nallıhan, Davutoğlan, 500 m, 27.05.2018 M.S 6839
F. rigidula DC. B5 Yozgat: Yozgat-Şefaatli output, 2. km, rocks, 920 m, 20.05.2018 M.S 6835
F. pisidica Akalın & Miski C4 Konya: Hadim-Beyreli Village, 1570 m, 2 1.06.2018 M.S 6876

Palynological and morphological analysis

For Light Microscope Studies: Pollen slides were prepared using the Wodehouse (1935) technique. The pollen grains were mounted in unstained glycerine jelly, stained with safranin and studies were made using an Olympus BX-21. The measurements were based on 30 readings from each specimen. Polar axis (P), equatorial diameter (E), P/E ratio, exine (ex), intine (in), colpi long axis (clg), colpi short axis (clt), pori long axis (plg), pori short axis (plt) and costae (c) were also measured.

For SEM studies: Dried pollen grains were transferred on to aluminium stubs and coated with gold at 20 Kv for 4 min in a sputter-coater. The SEM examination was carried using a ZEISS Supra 55 Scanning Electron Microscope at the SEM Laboratory of the Central Research Laboratory (MERLAB), Yuzuncu Yil University, Van.

The pollen terminology was adopted from Faegri and Iversen (1975), Punt (1984) and Punt et al. (2007) and the shape classification followed that of Erdtman (1969), based on the P/E ratio in Tables 2, 3.

Table 2.

Pollen morphological parameters in the investigated taxa.

Taxon P E P/E Clg Clt Plg Plt Exine Intine Costa
F. szowitsiana 35.03±2.67 15.82±1.17 2.21 23.28±2.14 0.68±0.18 5.80±0.68 8.42±1.24 1.23±0.24 0.53±0.17 0.94±0.21
F. drudeana 34.27±2.13 15.18±1.42 2.26 23.23±2.47 0.63±0.17 5.73±0.64 7.07±0.81 1.38±0.14 0.48±0.14 1.03±0.19
F. coskunii 25.33±1.95 13.70±1.16 1.85 18.95±2.47 0.62±0.25 5.18±0.77 7.80±1.21 0.81±0.19 0.45±0.19 0.75±0.21
F. mervynii 22.28±2.17 14.40±1.50 1.55 16.83±1.90 0.70±0.20 3.77±0.68 4.52±0.88 0.79±0.27 0.51±0.17 0.68±0.17
F. communis 32.73±1.89 18.73±1.63 1.75 24.63±2.28 0.66±0.24 5.68±0.55 9.28±0.61 1.55±0.24 0.58±0.12 1.54±0.19
F. tingitana 32.03±1.59 15.27±1.08 1.78 27.27±1.34 0.81±0.22 5.87±0.64 7.00±0.71 0.98±0.16 0.39±0.13 1.24±0.20
F. duranii 30.73±2.03 18.72±1.43 1.64 24.27±1.41 0.45±0.18 5.20±0.92 7.08±0.79 0.68±0.21 0.37±0.10 0.71±0.12
F. lycia 34.43±1.37 16.33±1.21 2.11 25.92±1.66 0.72±0.17 5.35±0.45 6.73±0.67 1.40±0.27 0.65±0.26 1.30±0.27
F. hermonis 34.40±2.81 16.52±1.38 2.08 23.98±1.20 0.60±0.12 5.65±0.49 8.78±1.25 1.18±0.25 0.53±0.14 0.77±0.18
F. anatolica 27.83±1.34 16.47±1.28 1.69 27.17±1.68 0.78±0.19 5.07±0.76 6.87±0.92 1.09±0.12 0.50±0.18 0.73±0.15
F. orientalis 37.17±2.70 18.33±1.79 2.03 26.03±2.38 0.66±0.19 5.48±0.59 8.17±0.95 1.34±0.22 0.33±0.12 1.35±0.22
F. brevipedicellata 32.77±2.17 16.05±1.32 2.04 26.28±1.97 0.61±0.13 4.67±0.67 6.10±0.64 1.30±0.28 0.48±0.11 1.16±0.26
F. halophila 33.50±1.43 17.16±1.26 1.95 24.87±1.78 0.70±0.19 5.40±0.66 7.90±1.15 1.89±0.24 0.73±0.20 1.73±0.22
F. parva 33.15±2.19 16.33±1.20 2.03 24.03±2.65 0.50±0.11 5.03±0.94 6.30±1.20 1.68±0.23 0.47±0.18 1.53±0.19
F. tenuissima 40.47±3.09 17.23±1.68 2.35 30.73±2.65 0.78±0.21 5.70±0.48 8.80±0.68 1.40±0.25 0.39±0.213 1.37±0.16
F. haussknechtii 31.23±1.63 16.43±1.54 1.90 23.97±1.63 0.55±0.10 5.63±0.57 6.83±0.70 1.45±0.17 0.55±0.15 1.22±0.29
F. elaeochytris 30.83±1.70 16.10±1.18 1.92 25.17±1.62 0.48±0.16 3.91±0.62 5.50±1.03 1.23±0.21 0.42±0.18 1.52±0.22
F. longipedunculata 32.87±2.58 17.27±1.33 1.90 24.83±1.62 0.78±0.18 5.82±0.50 8.47±0.87 1.51±0.19 0.34±0.12 1.45±0.19
F. divaricata 34.70±2.60 17.20±1.42 2.02 24.77±1.77 1.02±0.21 5.65±0.53 8.20±0.82 1.52±0.18 0.58±0.25 1.50±0.19
F. huber-morathii 35.08±1.74 16.87±1.50 2.08 23.70±2.22 0.76±0.18 5.88±0.60 7.82±1.13 1.48±0.25 0.46±0.14 1.29±0.23
F. caspica 27.03±1.87 14.37±1.22 1.88 22.63±1.61 0.50±0.14 4.53±0.92 5.77±0.84 1.17±0.22 0.49±0.17 1.10±0.18
F. rigidula 33.90±1.88 18.20±1.61 1.86 19.83±1.97 0.53±0.16 6.05±0.56 5.95±0.58 1.55±0.27 0.48±0.16 1.67±0.21
F. pisidica 32.17±2.52 17.83±2.12 1.80 25.50±2.75 0.57±0.18 5.05±1.03 7.62±1.39 1.52±0.19 0.37±0.13 1.50±0.19

Numerical analysis

Using the SPSS 21.0 statistical programme, clustering analysis was performed to determine the similarities between groups (Fig. 5). Seven palynological characters were selected to distinguish the 23 taxa of the genera (Table 3). Each of these palynological characters is included in the analysis by giving numerical values. Since Gower’s formula (Gower 1971) was modified by Podani (1999), it now allows the inclusion of ordinal variables and missing scores in the data matrix. Thus, it was used to calculate the primary mixed data for dissimilarities. Additionally, Scatterplot analysis was performed by using P and E values. The graph obtained is shown in Figure 6.

Table 3.

Eight palynological characters to distinguish the 23 taxa of the genus Ferula.

No Taxa P E P/E Exine Costae Ornamentation, polar area Ornamentation, equatorial area Ornamentation, pore around
F1 F. szowitsiana 35.03 15.82 Perprolate 1.23 0.94 striate-reticulate rugulate rugulate-striate
F2 F. drudeana 34.27 15.18 Perprolate 1.38 1.03 striate-reticulate rugulate rugulate-striate
F3 F. coskunii 25.33 13.70 Prolate 0.81 0.75 striate-perforate rugulate rugulate-striate
F4 F. mervynii 22.28 14.40 Prolate 0.79 0.68 striate-reticulate rugulate-striate rugulate-striate
F5 F. communis 32.73 18.73 Prolate 1.55 1.54 striate-reticulate rugulate-perforate striate-reticulate
F6 F. tingitana 32.03 15.27 Prolate 0.98 1.24 striate-reticulate rugulate-striate rugulate-striate
F7 F. duranii 30.73 18.72 Prolate 0.68 0.71 striate-reticulate rugulate striate
F8 F. lycia 34.43 16.33 Perprolate 1.40 1.30 rugulate-striate rugulate-striate rugulate
F9 F. hermonis 34.40 16.52 Perprolate 1.18 0.77 striate-reticulate rugulate striate
F10 F. anatolica 27.83 16.47 Prolate 1.09 0.73 striate-reticulate rugulate striate
F11 F. orientalis 37.17 18.33 Perprolate 1.34 1.35 striate-reticulate rugulate striate
F12 F. brevipedicellata 32.77 16.05 Perprolate 1.30 1.16 rugulate-striate rugulate rugulate-striate
F13 F. halophila 33.50 17.16 Prolate 1.89 1.73 striate-reticulate rugulate striate
F14 F. parva 33.15 16.33 Perprolate 1.68 1.53 striate-reticulate rugulate striate
F15 F. tenuissima 40.47 17.23 Perprolate 1.40 1.37 striate-reticulate rugulate striate
F16 F. haussknechtii 31.23 16.43 Prolate 1.45 1.22 rugulate-verrucate verrucate verrucate
F17 F. elaeochytris 30.83 16.10 Prolate 1.23 1.52 striate-reticulate rugulate rugulate-striate
F18 F. longipedunculata 32.87 17.27 Prolate 1.51 1.45 striate-reticulate rugulate striate
F19 F. divaricata 34.70 17.20 Perprolate 1.52 1.50 striate-reticulate rugulate rugulate-striate
F20 F. huber-morathii 35.08 16.87 Perprolate 1.48 1.29 striate-reticulate rugulate striate
F21 F. caspica 27.03 14.37 Prolate 1.17 1.10 striate-reticulate rugulate striate-reticulate
F22 F. rigidula 33.90 18.20 Prolate 1.55 1.67 striate-reticulate rugulate verrucate
F23 F. pisidica 32.17 17.83 Prolate 1.52 1.50 striate-reticulate rugulate striate


The pollen properties of 23 species of Turkish Ferula are here described for the first time. All of the morphological parameters investigated are shown in Tables 2, 3 and in Figs 16. The pollen grains are radially symmetrical and isopolar. The shape is prolate and perprolate. Their apertures are operculate and tricolporate with costae. In this study, the genus Ferula was found to have three types of polar shapes; triangular, triangular to subtriangular, and circular to subcircular (Figs 1, 2).

Figure 1. 

LM micrographs of pollen grains in the Ferula taxa examined 1–3 F. szowitsiana 4–6 F. drudeana 7–9 F. coskuni 10–12 F. mervynii 13–15 F. communis 16–18 F. tingitana 19–21 F. duranii 22–24 F. lycia 25–27 F. hermonis 28–30 F. anatolica 31–33 F. orientalis 34–36 F. brevipedicellata 37–39 F. halophila 40–42 F. parva. Scale bar: 20 µm. (Equatorial view: 1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 37, 40. Polar view: 2, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, 29, 32, 35, 38, 41. Aperture view: 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42).

The polar axis (P) ranges from 22.28 to 40.47 μm and the equatorial axis (E) ranges from 13.70 to 18.73 μm. The polar axis is longest in F. tenuissima (40.47 μm) and shortest in F. mervynii (22.28 μm); the equatorial axis is longest in F. communis (18.73 μm) and shortest in F. coskunii (13.70 μm). The dimensions are smaller in F. mervynii and larger in F. tenuissima. In all taxa examined, the width of the porus (plt) is greater than the width of the colpus (clt). The colpus is short to rather long (16.83–30.73 µm), narrow (0.45–1.02 µm) and slit-like. The highest values were observed in F. tenuissima and F. tingitana. F. mervynii has the smallest measures of colpus. Intine thickness ranges between 0.33 and 0.73 µm. Intine was thickest in F. halophila and thinnest in F. orientalis. The exine is tectate and 0.68–1.89 µm in thickness in the equatorial area. Exine was thickest in F. halophila and thinnest in F. duranii. There is a thickening around the aperture of exine (costae) with a decreasing diameter towards the poles. In addition, F. halophila (1.73 μm) and F. rigidula (1.1.67 μm) have the thickest costae (Table 2).

Figure 2. 

LM micrographs of pollen grains in the Ferula taxa examined 1–3 F. tenuissima 4–6 F. haussknechtii 7–9 F. elaeochytris 10–12 F. longipedunculata 13–15 F. divaricata 16–18 F. huber-morathii 19–21 F. caspica 22–24 F. rigidula 25–27 F. pisidica. Scale bar: 20 µm. (Equatorial view: 1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25. Polar view: 2, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26. Aperture view: 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27).

According to LM investigations; prolate pollen shape were observed in F. coskunii, F. mervynii, F. communis, F. tingitana, F. duranii, F. anatolica, F. halophila, F. haussknechtii, F. elaeochytris, F. longipedunculata, F. caspica, F. rigidula and F. pisidica. Other taxa are perprolate. In other words, in terms of pollen shape, about half of the studied taxa is prolate and the other half is perprolate.

Through SEM investigation, several types of ornamentations were observed in the equatorial area, polar area and around the pore on pollen surfaces. In many pollens, it has been determined that the ornamentation around the pore is different from that in both polar and equatorial areas. In the equatorial area, ornamentation was determined to be; rugulate in 18 species, rugulate-striate in three species, rugulate-perforate in one species and verrucate in one species. In the polar area, ornamentation was striate-reticulate in 19 species, rugulate-striate in two species, striate-perforate in one species, and rugulate-verrucate in one species. Around the pore area, ornamentation was; striate in 10 species, rugulate-striate in eight species, striate-reticulate in two species, verrucate in two species and rugulate in one species (Figs 3, 4).

Figure 3. 

SEM micrographs of pollen grains in the Ferula taxa examined 1 F. szowitsiana 2 F. drudeana 3 F. coskuni 4 F. mervynii 5 F. communis 6 F. tingitana 7 F. duranii 8 F. lycia 9 F. hermonis 10 F. anatolica 11 F. orientalis 12 F. brevipedicellata.

Figure 4. 

SEM micrographs of pollen grains in the Ferula taxa examined 13 F. halophila 14 F. parva 15 F. tenuissima 16 F. haussknechtii 17 F. elaeochytris 18 F. longipedunculata 19 F. divaricata 20 F. huber-morathii 21 F. caspica 22 F. rigidula 23 F. pisidica.

In the genus Ferula, different palynological characters, which became evident over the course of the investigation, were measured, leading to the realisation of a dendrogram. This dendrogram shows the similarities or dissimilarities which exist amongst the taxa being studied. The dendrogram obtained in this research is based on the seven palynological variables of the 23 taxa of Ferula genus and is presented in Figure 5. The dendrogram was constructed by using Average Linkage (Between Groups) of the examined data revealed through two main groups. From the dendrogram, it is evident that F. coskunii, F. mervynii, F. anatolica and F. caspica are quite different from the other species and were the first to separate. In scatterplot graphs, it is seen that the species with the smallest (F. mervynii) and largest (F. tenuissima) pollen differ from other species (Fig. 6).

Figure 5. 

Dendrogram using Average Linkage (Between Groups) of the examined data (F1: F. szowitsiana; F2: F. drudeana; F3: F. coskuni; F4: F. mervynii; F5: F. communis; F6: F. tingitana; F7: F. duranii; F8: F. lycia; F9: F. hermonis; F10: F. anatolica; F11: F. orientalis; F12: F. brevipedicellata; F13: F. halophila; F14: F. parva; F15: F. tenuissima; F16: F. haussknechtii; F17: F. elaeochytris; F18: F. longipedunculata; F19: F. divaricata; F20: F. huber-morathii; F21: F. caspica; F22: F. rigidula; F23: F. pisidica).

Figure 6. 

Graphs of Scatterplot (F1: F. szowitsiana; F2: F. drudeana; F3: F. coskuni; F4: F. mervynii; F5: F. communis; F6: F. tingitana; F7: F. duranii; F8: F. lycia; F9: F. hermonis; F10: F. anatolica; F11: F. orientalis; F12: F. brevipedicellata; F13: F. halophila; F14: F. parva; F15: F. tenuissima; F16: F. haussknechtii; F17: F. elaeochytris; F18: F. longipedunculata; F19: F. divaricata; F20: F. huber-morathii; F21: F. caspica; F22: F. rigidula; F23: F. pisidica).


Pollen morphology of 23 taxa has been examined by light and scanning microscope. Pollen grains of Ferula taxa were generally tricolporate, with the shape of the grains being prolate and perprolate. The P/E ratio ranged from 1.55 to 2.35. The pollen in approximately half of the species examined in this study has a perprolate shape, which is characteristic for the Apiaceae family (Baczyńskı et al. 2021). In the analysis, according to the ratio of P and E values, the largest pollen grains were found in F. tenuissima and the smallest in F. duranii (Table 2).

The pollen morphologies of the Turkish Ferula species have taxonomic significance. Variation was mainly observed in pollen shape and pollen sculpturing. The sculpturing of the pollen exine is useful for ascertaining relationships amongst species (Brochmann 1992). They differ in sculpturing from the equatorial area to the poles. In addition, different ornamentations around the pore were found (Table 3, Figs 3, 4).

Prolate, perprolate and tricolporate pollen with costae grains were seen in all species. The common aperture type of Apiaceae pollen grains is 3-colporate (rarely 4-colporate porate) and colpi with costae (Perveen and Qaiser 2006; Yousefzadi et al. 2006; Pehlivan et al. 2009; Güner et al. 2011). Ferula pollen grains have only a tricolporate aperture. It has been suggested that the outline of the endo-aperture is most important for the identification of Apiaceae (Cerceau-Larrival 1962; Punt 1984; Hebda 1985).

Palynological contributions on the family Umbelliferae are numerous, but often fragmentary and concern few species (Anefrod 1960; Erdtman 1971; Moore and Webb 1978; Punt 1984; Faegri and Iversen 1989). The most complete and interdisciplinary studies to date have been carried out by Cerceau-Larrival (1962, 1963, 1965, 1967, 1968, 1971, 1974, 1981), Cerceau-Larrival and Deroquet (1975) and De Leonardis et al. (2009), which not only allow correlation between the shape of fruits with the symmetry of radiosymmetric pollen, the pollen shape with the size of cotyledonous leaves and the value of the P/E ratio with the phenotype stability of the belonging tribe, but also further deepen the knowledge of the shape of the pollen grains, the variability of the sporodermic wall and the presence of columellar hypertrophy as adaptation to environmental conditions.

Cerceau-Larrival (1962) divided the pollen of Umbelliferae into five types based on P/E ratio: subrhomboidal (type1, P/E: 1–1.5), subcircular (type 2, P/E: 1–1.5), oval (type 3, P/E: 1.5–2), subrectangular (type 4, P/E: 2) and equatorially constricted (type 5, P/E: over 2). In the present study, all of the taxa examined belong to all of the pollen types as described by Cerceau-Larrival, the oval-type with a P/E ratio of 1.5–2 to the equatorially constricted type with a P/E ratio greater than 2. The diversification in the family Apiaceae of the phyletic series was subrhomboidal > subcircular > oval > subrectangular > equatorially constricted (Gruas-Cavagnetto and Cerceau-Larrival 1978), where a suboval or rectangular shape is a more advanced feature (De Leonardis et al. 2008).

Cerceau-Larrival (1959, 1962) and Punt (1984) observed that the polar view of Apiaceae was important for the differentiation of the pollen types. In this study, it was found that the genus Ferula had three types of polar shapes: triangular, triangular to subtriangular and circular to subcircular. Punt (1984) divided the family into 50 pollen types, based on the two outer contour shapes (outer contour of mesocolpium side straight or convex and concave or slightly concave). The outer contours of generally examined taxa are concave, slightly concave or straight, while those of F. mervynii and F. communis are convex, according to Punt’s classification.

Pollen ornamentation is one of the most significant characteristics that can be used to separate taxa (Pınar et al. 2009; Mačukanović-Jocić et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2017). It was observed in the present research that Ferula was striate-reticulate, rugulate-striate, striate-perforate and rugulate-verrucate in polar view; rugulate, rugulate-striate, rugulate-perforate and verrucate in equatorial view; and rugulate-striate, striate-reticulate, rugulate, striate and verrucate around the pore in exine ornamentation. This situation reflects the variation between the species.

Pollen morphology of 50 species representing 27 genera of the family Umbelliferae from Pakistan was examined by Perveen and Qaiser (2006). They determined that the pollen grains of Umbelliferae were generally tricolporate, the shape of the grains varied from prolate-perprolate, and the P/E ratio ranged from 1.2 to 2.6. Tectum is uniformly striate to striate-rugulate. In their study, all the taxa examined belong to all the pollen types as identified by Cerceau-Larrival; that is, subrhomboidal type to equatorially constricted type. The present study has very similar results to these palynological properties. According to the findings of this current study; pollen grains are tricolporate, the shape of the pollens is prolate-perprolate, the P/E ratio ranges from 1.55 to 2.35 and all of the examined taxa belong to the oval to subrhomboidal type. Related to the tectum, three distinct pollen types are recognized viz., in Pakistan, Bupleurum gilessii-type, Pleurospermum hookeri-type, Trachyspermum ammi-type. The tectal surface of the Pleurospermum hookeri type is rugulate-striate, which was observed particularly around the polar, equatorial and pore areas of the taxa examined in the present study.

In another study, Güner et al. (2011) observed the following ornamentation types of Seseli: rugulate in the equatorial area, psilate at the poles; striate-reticulate at equator, rugulate at poles; rugulate at equator, striate at poles; and rugulate-granulate at equator, striate at poles. Ornamentation types such as rugulate, striate-reticulate and striate were also observed in Ferula pollens.

The results of the cluster analysis show that the examined members of Ferula that fall into two main groups coincide with pollen sizes (Fig. 5). According to the dendrogram using Average Linkage (Between Groups) analysis, based on pollen morphological data, each species was distinctly separated from each other. Pollen morphological characteristics, such as polar axis (P), equatorial axis (E), the ratio of P/E and ornamentation at the polar and equatorial view, are the most valuable variables for separating the Ferula species. In the scatterplot graphs, F. coskunii, F. mervynii, F. anatolica and F. caspica species were grouped together, just as in the dendrogram. These species were found as the external taxa separating from the other taxa at first in the dendrogram and the plot (Figs 5, 6). It was found that the P value of these four species is smaller than the other species. At the same time, three of these four species have lower E values than other species. In this case, it can be said that the P value is the primary valuable variable and E value had secondary importance for separating the species of Ferula.

According to Cluster analysis; F. szowitsiana, F. drudeana, F. hermonis, F. divaricata and F. huber-morathii species are in the same clade. The pollen shapes of these taxa are perprolate and ornamentation in the polar area is striate-reticulate, while in the equatorial area it is rugulate. F. halophila, F. parva, F. longipedunculata, F. rigidula and F. pisidica are found in the same clade and have P and E values that are very close to each other, with ornamentation in the polar area being striate-reticulate and rugulate in the equatorial area. F. lycia and F. brevipedicellata are more similar, the pollen shapes of these taxa are perprolate and ornamentation in the polar area is rugulate-striate. F. tingitana and F. elaeochytris species are in the same clade and their pollen shapes are prolate, with ornamentation in the polar area being striate-reticulate. F. communis and F. duranii species are similar, with perprolate pollen shapes, E values that are very close to each other and ornamentation in the polar area being striate-reticulate. F. orientalis and F. tenuissima species are more similar because the pollen shapes of these two taxa are perprolate, exine and costa values are very close to each other and ornamentation in the polar area is striate-reticulate, while it is rugulate in the equatorial area. The species F. haussknechtii differs from the species closest to it in that its ornamentation is rugulate-verrucate in the polar area and verrucate in the equatorial area.

Some Ferula species in the same clade are closely related to each other morphologically; for example, F. szowitsiana and F. drudeana; F. coskunii and F. mervynii; F. halophila, F. parva and F. rigidula. In other words, in some species, palynological data support the separation of taxa according to morphological characteristics.


In conclusion, analysis of pollen grains of 23 Ferula species in Turkey by LM and SEM revealed that palynological characteristics are reliable criteria for explaining the relationships between these species. The results of the cluster analysis showed that the most important variables in order to separate the taxa of Ferula in this study are the P and E values, ratio of P/E (pollen shapes) and ornamentation in the polar and equatorial area. In other words, these particular pollen characteristics seem to have the potential for evaluation of infrageneric relationships in the genus Ferula.


The authors thank, for his assistance in the preparation of SEM microphotographs, Dr. Yüksel Akınay and Dr. Ihsan Nuri Akkus (Science Application and Research Center, University of Yuzuncuyil, Van) and Assoc. Prof. Dr. Yaşar Kıran (Firat University) for his contributions.


  • Akalın E, Tuncay HO, Olcay B, Miski M (2020) The new Ferula (Apiaceae) species from Southwest Anatolia: Ferula pisidica Akalı & Miski. Plants 9(6): e740.
  • Anefrod D (1960) The evolution of flowering plants. The evolution of life. 1. University of Chicago of Press, Chicago.
  • Aytuğ B, Aykut S, Merev N, Edis G (1971) İstanbul Çevresi Bitkilerinin Polen Atlası. İ.Ü. Orman Fakültesi Yayınları No 174. Kutulmuş Matbaası, İstanbul, Turkey. [in Turkish]
  • Baldemir A, Alan Ş, Şahin AA, Paksoy MY, Pınar NM (2018) Pollen morphology of Scaligeria DC. (Apiaceae) in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany 42(4): 462–477.
  • Bilgili B, Sagiroglu M, Şeker M, Duman H (2016) Dichoropetalum alanyensis (Apiaceae), a new species from South Anatolia, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany 40: 201–208.
  • Cerceau-Larrival MT (1959) Clé de determination d’Ombellifères de France et d’Afrique du Nord d’après leurs grains de pollen. Pollen et Spores 1: 145–190. [in French]
  • Cerceau-Larrival MT (1962) Le pollen d’Ombelliferes Mediterraneennes. Pollen et Spores 4: 95–104. [in French]
  • Cerceau-Larrival MT (1963) Le pollen d’Ombelliferes Mediterraneennes. 2. Tordylinae Drude. Pollen et Spores 5: 297–323. [in French]
  • Cerceau-Larrival MT (1965) Le pollen d’Ombelliferes Mediterraneennes. 3. Scandicinae Drude, 4. Daudaceae Drude. Pollen et Spores 7: 35–62. [in French]
  • Cerceau-Larrival MT (1968) Contribution palynologique et biogeografique a letude biolgique de l’Amerique Australe. Biol Am Austr 4: 1–197.
  • Cerceau-Larrival MT (1971) Morphologie pollinique et correlations phytogenetiques chez les ombelliferes. In: Heywood VH (Ed.) The Biology and Chemistry of the Umbelliferae. Academic Press, New York, 109–155. [in French]
  • Cerceau-Larrival MT (1974) Playnologie et raparition des Ombelliferes australes actuelles. Relations avec les Geoflores tertiaires. Sciences Géologiques. Bulletin 27(1): 117–134.
  • Cerceau-Larrival MT (1981) World pollen and spore flora 9. Umbelliferae Juss. Hydrocotyloideae Drude/Hydrocotyleae Drude. Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm, 33 pp.
  • Cerceau-Larrival MT, Deroquet L (1975) Apport de la microscopie electronique a balayage a la connaissance de l’ultrastructure de l’exine de pollens d’Ombelliferes. Soc. Bot Fr Coll Palynologie: 93–95.
  • Chamberlain DF, Rechinger KH (1987) Ferula L. In: Rechinger KH (Ed.) Flora Iranica, Graz, Akademische Druck-u, Verlagsanstalt, 387–425.
  • De Leonardis W, De Santis C, Ferrauto G, Fichera G, Zizza A (2008) Palynological key of identification of three genera belonging to family Apiaceae. Bolletino della Accademia Giornia di Scienze Naturali Catania 41: 81–90.
  • De Leonardis W, De Santis C, Ferrauto G, Fichera G (2009) Pollen morphology of six species of Bupleurum L. (Apiaceae) present in Sicily and taxonomic implications. Plant Biosystems 143(2): 293–300.
  • Erdtman G (1969) Handbook of Palynology. Hafner Publishing Co., New York.
  • Erdtman G (1971) Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy I. Angiosperms. Hafner Publishing Co., New York.
  • Faegri K, Iversen J (1975) Textbook of Pollen Analysis. Hafner Publishing Co., New York.
  • Faegri K, Iversen J (1989) Textbook of pollen analysis. IV ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Gruas-Cavagnetto C, Cerceau-Larrival MT (1978) Presence de pollens d’Ombelliferes fossiles dans le Paleogene du Bassin Anglo-Parisien: premiers resultats. In: Cauwet-Marc AM, Carbonnier J (Eds) Les Ombelliferes: Contributions pluridisciplinaires a la systematique: actes du 2eme Symposium International sur les Ombelliferes, Centre Universitaire de Perpignan, 18–21 Mai 1977. Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, 255–267. [in French]
  • Güner ED, Duman H, Pınar NM (2011) Pollen morphology of the genus Seseli L. (Umbelliferae) in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany 35: 175–182.
  • Güner A, Aslan S, Ekim T, Vural M, Babaç MT (2012) Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarlı Bitkiler), Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi ve Flora Araştırmaları Derneği Yayını, Istanbul. [in Turkish]
  • Korovin EP (1947) Generis Ferula (Tourn.) L. monographia illustrata. Academiae Scientiarum UzRSS, Tashkent.
  • Korovin EP (1951) Ferula L. In: BK Schisckin (Ed.) Flora of the USSR. XVII (Umbelliflorae). Akademii Nauk SSSR, Moscow, 44–3101.
  • Kuprianova LA, Alyshina LA (1972) Pollen and Spores of Plants from the Flora of European Part of the USSR: I. Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow. [in Russian]
  • Kurzyna-Mlynik R, Oskolski AA, Downie SR, Kopacz R, Wojewódzka A, Spalik K (2008) Phylogenetic position of the genus Ferula (Apiaceae) and its placement in tribe Scandiceae as inferred from nr DNA ITS sequence variation. Plant Systematics and Evolution 274(1–2): 47–66.
  • Mačukanović-Jocić M, Stešević D, Rančić D, Stevanović ZD (2017) Pollen morphology and the flower visitors of Chaerophyllum coloratum L. (Apiaceae). Acta Botanica Croatica 76(1): 1–8.
  • Moore PD, Webb JA (1978) An Illustrated Guide to Pollen Analysis. Hodder and Stoughton, London.
  • Mungan F, Yildiz K, Minareci E, Kiliccedil M (2011) A palynological study of the genus Smyrnium (Umbelliferae) from Turkey. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 5: 997–1003.
  • Nigaud M (1977) Micrographie de detail de la paroi pollinique chez le genre Peucedanum L. (Umbelliferae). Colloque de Palynologie, 1975. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France 122(sup1): 121–124.
  • Nigaud M (1980) Relations entre la structure exinique, la morphologie tectale du pollen, les conditions climatiques et ècologiques chez certaines espèces due genre Peucedanum L. (Umbelliferae). Bulletin du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle. Paris, de Sèr. 2: 263–277.
  • Nilsson S, Praglowski J, Nilsson L (1977) An Atlas of Airborne Pollen Grains and Spores in Northern Europe. Natur och Kultur, Stockholm, 159 pp.
  • Pehlivan S, Başer B, Cabi E (2009) Pollen morphology of 10 taxa belonging to Prangos Lindl. and Ekimia H. Duman & M.F. Watson (Umbelliferae) from Turkey and its taxonomic significance. Bangladesh Journal of Plant Taxonomy 16(2): 165–174.
  • Perveen A, Qaiser M (2006) Pollen Flora of Pakistan-XLVIII. Umbelliferae. Pakistan Journal of Botany 38: 1–14.
  • Pesmen H (1972) Ferula L. In: Davis PH (Ed.) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands (Vol. 4). Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 440–453.
  • Pimenov MG, Leonov MV (1993) The genera of the Umbelliferae. A nomenclature. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
  • Pimenov MG, Leonov MV (2004) The Asian Umbelliferae Biodiversity Database (ASIUM) with particular reference to South-West Asian Taxa. Turkish Journal of Botany 28: 139–145.
  • Pınar NM, Duran A, Çeter T, Tuğ GN (2009) Pollen and seed morphology of the genus Hesperis L. (Brassicaceae) in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany 33(2): 83–96.
  • Sağıroğlu M, Duman H (2006) Ferula parva Freyn & Bornm. (Apiaceae): A contribution to an enigmatic species from Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany 30(5): 399–404.
  • Sağıroğlu M, Duman H (2008) Rediscovery of Ferula anatolica and Ferula drudeana (Apiaceae) from Turkey. Biological Diversity and Conservation 4(1): 191–197.
  • Sağıroğlu M, Duman H (2010) Ferula brevipedicellata and F. duranii (Apiaceae), two new species from Anatolia, Turkey. Annales Botanici Fennici 47(4): 293–300.
  • Sağıroğlu M, Duman H (2014) Are Ferula tenuissima and F. amanicola distinct species or not? Biological Diversity and Conservation 7(3): 74–77.
  • Shneyer VS, Borschtschenko GP, Pimenov MG (1995) Immunochemical appraisal of relationships within the tribe Peucedaneae (Apiaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 198(1–2): 1–16.
  • Ting WS (1961) On some pollen of Californian Umbelliferae. Pollen et spores 3: 189–199.
  • Ting WS, Tseng CC, Mathias ME (1964) A survey of pollen morphology of Hydrocotyloideae. Pollen et spores 6: 479–514.
  • Van Zeist W, Bottema S, Freitag H (1977) Palynological investigations in Western Iran. Palaeohistoria 19: 20–85.
  • Visset L (1972) Pollens actuels, observes en microscopie èlectronique à la balayage. Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 48: 413–423.
  • Wodehouse RP (1935) Pollen Grains. Their Structure, Identification and Significance in Science and Medicine. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • Yang J, An Z, Li Z, Jing S, Qina H (2006) Sesquiterpene coumarins from the roots of Ferula sinkiangensis and Ferula teterrima. Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin 54(11): 1595–1598.
  • Yousefzadi M, Azizian D, Sonboli A, Mehrabian AR (2006) Palynological studies of the genus Tetratenium (Apiaceae) from Iran. Iranian Journal of Botany 12: 44–46.
  • Zhang WX, Zhao MM, Fan JJ, Zhou T, Chen YX, Cao FL (2017) Study on relationship between pollen exine ornamentation pattern and germplasm evolution in flowering crabapple. Scientific Reports 7(1): e39759.