Research Article
Research Article
Taxonomic revision of Sageretia (Rhamnaceae) from China I: identities of S. lucida, S. thea var. cordiformis and S. yunlongensis, with the description of a new species S. ellipsoidea
expand article infoYi Yang, Hua Peng§, Hang Sun§
‡ Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China
§ Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
Open Access


A taxonomic revision of Sageretia lucida, S. thea var. cordiformis and S. yunlongensis in China is presented. Sageretia lucida is revised in terms of morphological characters (habit, branchlet color, phyllotaxis and rachis length), distribution, habitat, and phenology; S. thea var. cordiformis is raised to S. cordiformis; and S. yunlongensis is excluded from the genus Sageretia and reduced to the synonym of Rhamnus nigricans. Furthermore, a new species, S. ellipsoidea, is erected based on the paratype collections of S. lucida. The new species morphologically differs from S. lucida in having reddish brown branchlets, opposite or subopposite phyllotaxis, shorter rachises, and flowering in spring or early summer. S. ellipsoidea is factually closest to S. hamosa as they share similar woody-vine habit and larger fruit size, and fruiting in winter, whereas the former can be easily recognized based on its smaller leaf blades, fewer lateral veins, shorter rachises, and ellipsoidal or elliptic-ovoid fruits.


Granite mountain, limestone mountain, Rhamnus, woody vine


Sageretia Brongn., the mock buckthorn genus of Rhamnaceae, contains ca. 35 species (Chen and Schirarend 2007). The genus shows a pan-tropical distribution with most members inhabiting subtropical and tropical Asia, and a few in northeastern Africa and tropical America (Mabberley 2008; Yang et al. 2019). Generally, Sageretia species are shrubs or woody vines, and usually thrive in disturbed habitats which have poorly developed soils. Many members of the genus have branchlets terminating in woody thorns as a defense against herbivores, and some of them such as S. gracilis Drumm. & Sprague and S. thea (Osbeck) Johnst. are popular in bonsai gardening. Besides, the drupes of several species are edible, and the leaves are flavonoid-rich and potential substitutes for tea (Chen and Schirarend 2007; Chung et al. 2009; Hyun et al. 2015).

According to Flora of China (FOC; Chen and Schirarend 2007), a total of 19 species and 3 varieties of Sageretia are found in the regions south of the Qinling Mountains and the Huai River. Only one species, S. paucicostata Maxim., is extensively distributed northward to the Yinshan Mountains. However, two species and one variety are included in a provincial flora but absent in FOC, including S. cordifolia Tardieu in Flora Yunnanica (Fan 2006), S. filiformis (Roth) G.Don in Flora Xizangica (Chen and Zhou 1986) and Flora Yunnanica, and S. thea var. taiwaniana (Masam.) Y.C.Liu & C.M.Wang in Flora of Taiwan (Liu et al. 1993). Moreover, three species (S. gongshanensis G.S.Fan & L.L.Deng, S. latifolia Hand.-Mazz. and S. yunlongensis G.S.Fan & L.L.Deng) published earlier than FOC (Handel-Mazzetti 1933; Fan and Deng 1995, 1997), have not been included in FOC. Hence, together with the recently published S. liuzhouensis Yi Yang & H.Sun (Yang et al. 2017), 25 species and 4 varieties (19 endemic species and 3 varieties) have been recorded in China to date.

We have been studying the taxonomy, molecular phylogeny and biogeography of Sageretia since 2014, especially the members in China. A new species, the tropical Asian origin, and three strongly supported clades matching morphological and distributional divergences, had been reported in Sageretia in our previous studies (Yang et al. 2017, 2019). In this paper, we present several taxonomic problems in the genus and conduct corresponding revisions. In the process of protologue collation and specimen examination, S. lucida Merr., S. thea var. cordiformis Y.L.Chen & P.K.Chou and S. yunlongensis were found taxonomically problematic. Specifically, the paratypes of S. lucida distinctly differ from the type and actually represent a different species; S. thea var. cordiformis obviously diverges from S. thea var. thea in morphology and molecular phylogeny, and should be raised to a species; S. yunlongensis should be categorized in the genus Rhamnus L. rather than Sageretia. Thus, we here clarify the identities of these and related species.

Materials and methods

The protologues of all published names and molecularly phylogenetic studies of Sageretia, were carefully reviewed and collated. Specimens or digital specimen images from 26 herbaria, including A, CDBI, CSH, CZH, CSFI, E, FJSI, GXMG, HHBG, HITBC, IBK, IBSC, IMDY, K, KUN, LBG, LD, P, PE, SWFC, S, SYS, SZG, UC, US and WU (abbreviations follow Thiers 2020), were examined. In Sageretia, the flowers are generally too small (1–2 mm in diam.) and invariable to be used as diagnostic characters, and habit, branch, leaf and rachis characters are primarily applied in classification by contrast (Chen and Schirarend 2007; Yang et al. 2017). Despite morphological characters, habitat and phenology also perform important roles in diagnosis of Sageretia species. Thus, the information regarding photos in Plant Photo Back of China (PPBC, and Chinese Field Herbarium (CFH, was also incorporated in the statistics on distribution and phenology of target species. Furthermore, field investigations were conducted at type locations of S. lucida and S. thea var. cordiformis to acquire real knowledge about their habit, habitat and phenology.

Results and discussion

Taxonomic treatment

Rhamnus nigricans Hand.-Mazz., Anz. Akad. Wiss. Wien. Math.-Naturwiss. Kl. 62: 234–235. 1925.

Fig. 1

Sageretia yunlongensis G.S.Fan & L.L.Deng, Sida 16(3): 477, f. 1. 1995. syn. nov. Type: China. Yunnan: Yunlong County, 1300 m, 26 Oct 1987, Expedition Team 161 (holotype SWFC!)

Type material

China. Yunnan: “Beyendjing medium inter Tschuhsiung (Tsuyung) et Yungbei”, 1800 m, 15 May 1915, Hand.-Mazz. 6311 (holotype WU!; isotypes A [00051422], K [K000729152]).

Figure 1. 

Type specimens of Rhamnus nigricans and its synonym A isotype of R. nigricans (K [K000729152]) B holotype of S. yunlongensis (SWFC). A obtained from GBIF (, B photographed by Y. Yang.


Evergreen vines, shrubs or small trees up to 6 m tall, dioecious. Young branches yellowish-brown pubescent; old branches scattered with tuberculate lenticels. Leaves alternate; stipules caducous; petioles 1.2–2.5 cm; leaf blades papery or thickly papery, ovate, oblong to broadly elliptic, 5–16 × 3–7 cm, abaxially puberulent or only on veins, adaxially usually glabrous, lateral veins 5–7 pairs, prominent abaxially, impressed adaxially, base rounded to subcordate, margin densely cartilaginous serrulate, apex acuminate to shortly caudate. Inflorescences axillary, spicate or paniculate, rachises up to 10 cm, puberulent. Flowers unisexual, 5-merous; pedicels 1–2 mm; sepals triangular; petals clawed. Drupes subglobose or globose, ca. 6 mm in diam., turning purple-black at maturity; pyrenes 2–3, asymmetrical, abaxially with a margined furrow extending over 3/4 of length.


Flowering from May to July; ripe fruits from October to December.

Distribution and habitat

The species is distributed in southwestern China (Yunnan; Fig. 2). It grows in thickets on dry slope at elevation from 1300 to 2000 m.

Figure 2. 

Distribution of Rhamnus nigricans, Sageretia cordiformis, S. ellipsoidea, and S. lucida. The sites were obtained from the specimen records, our field investigations and photo information in CFH and PPBC.


Although the genera Rhamnus and Sageretia are similar in morphology, they distinctly differ in characters of inflorescence (fascicled, cymose racemes, or cymose panicles in Rhamnus vs. spikes or spicate panicles in Sageretia) and fruits (basally persistent discoid calyx tube in Rhamnus vs. persistent reflexed calyx or remaining inconspicuous disk in Sageretia). The type collection of S. yunlongensis, Expedition Team 161, has branched cymose panicles and fruits basally covered with discoid calyx tube, suggesting it belongs to Rhamnus rather than Sageretia. In fact, S. yunlongensis (Fig. 1B) extremely resembles R. nigricans (Fig. 1A), they share similar habit, indumentum, leaf blade shape and size, inflorescence, and fruit, and highly overlapped distribution. Thus S. yunlongensis is herein reduced to a synonym of R. nigricans.

Additional specimens examined

China. Yunnan: Weishan Yi and Hui Autonomous County, 1500 m, 2012, Weishan Expedition Team 5329271259 (IMDY); Yongde County, 1830 m, 9 Jul 2006, E.D. Liu 170 (KUN); Shuangbai County, 1670 m, 15 Apr 1957, W.Q. Yin 747 (KUN, LBG, PE); Lushui County, 1544 m, 12 May 2005, Gaoligong Shan Biodiversity Survey 23964 (E).

Sageretia cordiformis (Y.L.Chen & P.K.Chou) Yi Yang, H.Sun & H.Peng, comb. &, stat. nov.

Chinese name: xin ye que mei teng (心叶雀梅藤) Figs 3C, D, 4A, B

S. thea var. cordiformis Y.L.Chen & P.K.Chou in Bull. Bot. Lab. North-East. Forest. Inst. 5: 74. 1979. Basionym.

Type material

China. Yunnan: Xishuangbanna, Mengla County, 730 m, 28 Dec 1958, W.T. Wang 10496 (holotype KUN [1207932]; isotype KUN [1207933]).

Figure 3. 

Type specimens of Sageretia cordifolia, S. cordiformis and S. thea A, B isotypes of S. cordifolia (A: P [P01818867]; B: P [06765093]) C holotype of S. cordiformis (KUN [1207932]) D isotype of S. cordiformis (KUN [1207933]) E, F isotypes of S. thea (E: S [S11-12914]; F: LD [1749752]). A, B and E, F obtained from GBIF, C, D from NOI (


Evergreen shrubs. Branches usually alternate, armed, glabrous to puberulent; second- to fourth-year branches brown. Leaves alternate or subopposite; petioles 1–3 mm, leaf blades leathery, shiny, glabrous, cordate to ovate-orbicular, 1–3 × 0.8–2 cm, lateral veins 2–3 pairs, flat abaxially, impressed adaxially, base cordate or subcordate, margin crenate, apex obtuse or rounded. Inflorescences spicate or spicate-paniculate; rachises 1.5–5 (–10) cm. Flowers sessile; sepals triangular-ovate; petals clawed; stamens as long as petals. Drupes subglobose, ca. 5–6 mm in diam., from green to red and finally turn black, base with persistently reflexed calyx; pyrenes 2–3, emarginate at both ends, asymmetrical.


Flowering in September; ripe fruits from December to January of the following year.

Distribution and habitat

The species is distributed in China (southwestern Yunnan; Fig. 2). It grows in thickets on tropical limestone mountains at elevation from 700 to 1100 m.


In Flora Yunnanica, Fan (2006) reduced Sageretia thea var. cordiformis to the synonym of S. cordifolia (Fig. 3A, B) with no justification given. S. cordifolia occurs in Laos (Pakson) and factually resembles S. thea var thea. However, S. thea var. cordiformis and S. cordifolia differ in petiole length (1–3 mm in former vs. 4–8 mm in latter), leaf blade shape (cordate to ovate-orbicular vs. ovate-oblong to ovate-lanceolate) and size (1–3 × 0.8–2 cm vs. 3.5–6 × 1.5–3 cm), and number of lateral veins (2–3 pairs vs. 3–5 pairs) (Table 1). Hence, we disagree with Fan’s treatment.

Table 1.

Comparison of habitat and morphology among Sageretia cordifolia, S. cordiformis, and S. thea based on field observation, herbarium collections, and photo information obtained from CFH and PPBC.

S. cordifolia S. cordiformis S. thea
Habitat unknown limestone mountains hills or mountains
Branch color gray gray-brown to brownish brownish
Petiole length 4–8 mm 1–3 mm 2–7 mm
Leaf blade shape ovate-oblong to ovate-lanceolate, base cordate, apex acute to caudate-acuminate cordate or ovate-orbicular, base cordate or subcordate, apex obtuse or rounded elliptic, oblong, or ovate-elliptic, rarely ovate or nearly orbicular, base rounded or subcordate, apex acute, obtuse, or rounded
Leaf blade size 3.5–6 × 1.5–3 cm 1–3 × 0.8–2 cm 2–4.5 × 0.7–2.5 cm
Leaf texture leathery leathery paper
Lateral veins 3–5 pairs 2–3 pairs 3–5 (–7) pairs
Rachis 12–13 cm 1.5–5 (–10) cm 2–12 cm

Based on specimen examination and our field observations, S. thea var. cordiformis and the type variety (Fig. 3E, F, Fig. 4C, D) differ in petiole length (1–3 mm in S. thea var. cordiformis vs. 2–7 mm in type variety), leaf blade texture (leathery vs. papery), and number of lateral veins (2–3 pairs vs. 3–5 (–7) pairs). In fact, Chen and Chou (1979) had clearly mentioned the sharp morphological distinctions between S. thea var. cordiformis and the type variety in the protologue. Furthermore, the results of molecular phylogenetic analyses based on five loci (ITS, ETS, psbA-trnH, petA-psbJ and trnL-trnF) in Yang et al. (2019) indicated the independent species status of S. thea var. cordiformis splitting from the type variety. In their study, S. thea var. cordiformis, S. pycnophylla C.K.Schneid. and S. yilinii G.S.Fan & S.K.Chen form a clade, while S. thea var. thea is in a highly supported clade with S. subcaudata C.K.Schneid. and S. rugosa. Considering the broad discrepancies between S. thea var. cordiformis and S. thea var. thea in morphology and molecular phylogeny, we raise the former to S. cordiformis.

Figure 4. 

Field photos of Sageretia cordiformis (A, B) and S. thea (C, D) A and C habit B and D fruiting branch and leaf blades A–C photographed by Y. Yang, D by X.X. Zhu.

Specimens of Sageretia cordifolia examined

Laos. Pakson, 1200 m, Nov 1938, E. Poilane 28562 (holotype P [01818865]; isotypes P [P01818866, P01818867, P06765093]).

Additional specimens of Sageretia cordiformis examined

China. Yunnan: Mengla County, 25 Sept 1961, Y.H. Li 3588 (KUN); 1200 m, 24 Nov 1975, Y.H. Li 20033 (HITBC); 1000 m, 9 Sept 1959, S.C. Pei 10046 (HITBC); 10 Sept 2004, S.S. Zhou 2084 (PE); ca. 1000 m, 21 Dec 2015, Y. Yang & Z. Chen xsbn03 (KUN); ca. 1000 m, 24 Dec 2016, Y. Yang & L.S. Qian OYY001 (KUN).

Sageretia ellipsoidea Yi Yang, H.Sun & H.Peng, sp. nov.

Chinese name: tuo guo que mei teng (椭果雀梅藤) Figs 5, 6, 7

Type material

China. Guangdong: “Ying Tak, Taai Tsan, Wan Tong Shan” (Yingde City, Taizhen Town, Wentang Mountain), 17 Oct 1926, W.T. Tsang & K.C. Wong 2718 (holotype IBSC [0404901]; isotype SYS [SYS00086833]); 18 Oct 1926, W.T. Tsang & K.C. Wong 2723 (paratype IBSC [0404896]); 6 Oct 1926, W.T. Tsang & K.C. Wong 2479 (paratype SYS [SYS00086832]).

Figure 5. 

Holotype of Sageretia ellipsoidea (IBSC [0404901]). Image obtained from CVH (


Similar to S. hamosa (Wall.) Brongn., but differs in having smaller leaves (5–12 × 2.5–4 cm in S. ellipsoidea vs. 8–15 (–25) × 3.5–6 (–7) cm in S. hamosa), less lateral veins (5–7 pairs vs. 7–11 pairs), shorter rachises (1–3 (–10) cm vs. 6–20 (–25) cm), and ellipsoidal or elliptic-ovoid fruits (vs. subglobose or globose in S. hamosa).

Figure 6. 

Field photos of Sageretia ellipsoidea A habit B branch C flowering branch D fruiting branch. A–C photographed by Y. Yang and D by J. Lin.


Woody vines. Branches opposite or subopposite, glabrous; first-year branches green, sometimes with hard-straight spine opposite to leaf, second- to fourth-year branches reddish brown. Leaves opposite or subopposite; petioles 8–15 mm, leaf blades leathery, ovate-oblong, oblong to elliptic, 5–12 × 2.5–4 cm, lateral veins 5–7 pairs, prominent abaxially, impressed adaxially, base rounded, margin crenate, apex obtuse to shortly acuminate. Inflorescences usually axillary spicate, rarely spicate-paniculate; rachises 1–3 (–10) cm. Flowers subsessile, white to yellowish white; sepals triangular-ovate, ca. 1.5 mm, apex acute; petals clawed; stamens as long as petals. Drupes ellipsoidal or elliptic-ovoid, 10–12 × 5–7 mm, green, turning to orange-red, claret and finally purple-black, base with inconspicuous disk remains; pyrenes 1–2, emarginate at both ends, asymmetrical.

Figure 7. 

Sageretia ellipsoidea Yi Yang, H.Sun & H.Peng A flowering branch B fruiting branch C bottom surface of leaf blade D upper surface of leaf blade E drupe F pyrene (left) and seed (right).


Flowering from April to July, ripe fruits from November to January of next-year.


This species is named for its ellipsoidal or elliptic-ovoid drupes which are different from other Sageretia species (subglobose or globose).

Distribution and habitat

The species is currently found in southern China (Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, Hainan; Fig. 2), and probably in northeastern Vietnam. It grows in moist forests along streams on granite mountains below 1200 m.


When he erected the species Sageretia lucida, Merrill (1931) cited four collections, including W.T. Tsang & K.C. Wong 14340, 14579, 14584 and 15121, of which 15121 was selected as type and the other three collections were automatically treated as paratypes. However, the four numbers above belong to herbarium numbers which are ineffective nowadays, and the corresponding field numbers are W.T. Tsang & K.C. Wong 2479, 2718, 2723 and 3260, respectively. Moreover, another problem is that the paratype collections (2479, 2718 and 2723) factually represent an undescribed Sageretia species distinctly differing from S. lucida (3260) based on geological and morphological evidences. Among the four collections of S. lucida, three paratype collections were all collected from “Wan Tong Shan” (Wentang Shan) and type collection from “Chung Tung” (Zhongdong Village, about 10 km apart to the Wentang Shan). Based on field investigations, we find that Wentang Shan has granite landform while Zhongdong Village limestone landform. Furthermore, the three paratype collections are morphologically identical, but noticeably different from the type collection in terms of branchlet color (reddish brown in paratype collections vs. gray to dark gray in type collection), phyllotaxis (opposite or subopposite vs. alternate), rachis length (1–3 (–10) cm vs. 5–10 cm), and phenology (blooming in spring or early summer vs. in autumn) (seen in Table 2). Consequently, the species represented by the paratype collections of S. lucida is erected as a new species, namely S. ellipsoidea Yi Yang, H.Sun & H.Peng.

Besides, the samples of “Sageretia lucida” in Yang et al. (2019) factually also belong to S. ellipsoidea. According to Yang et al. (2019), the new species is sister to S. hamosa and they form an early diverging clade. In morphology and phenology, the new species also most resembles S. hamosa through sharing similar habit (woody vine), larger fruit size (ca. 1 cm long or in diam.) and fruiting season (winter). Nonetheless, S. ellipsoidea can be easily distinguished based on its smaller leaves, fewer lateral veins, shorter rachises, and ellipsoidal or elliptic-ovoid drupes (Table 2).

Table 2.

Comparison of habitat, morphology and phenology (florescence) among Sageretia ellipsoidea, S. hamosa and S. lucida based on field observation, herbarium collections, and photo information obtained from CFH and PPBC.

S. ellipsoidea S. hamosa S. lucida
Habitat granite mountains non-limestone hills or mountains limestone mountains
Habit woody vines wood vines shrubs
Phyllotaxis opposite or subopposite alternate or subopposite alternate
Branch color reddish brown reddish brown to brown gray to dark gray
Petiole length 8–15 mm 8–15 (–20) mm 6–10 mm
Leaf blade shape ovate-oblong, oblong or elliptic, base rounded, apex obtuse to shortly acuminate usually oblong or narrowly elliptic, base usually rounded, sometimes cordate, apex caudate-acuminate to shortly acuminate ovate-oblong to oblong, base subrounded to rounded, apex acuminate
Leaf blade size 5–12 × 2.5–4 cm 8–15 (–25) × 3.5–7 cm 5–10 × 2.5–4 cm
Lateral veins 5–7 pairs 7–11 pairs 4–6 pairs
Rachis 1–3 (–10) cm 6–20 (–25) cm 5–10 cm
Fruits ellipsoidal or elliptic-ovoid globose or subglobose unknown
Florescence April to July July to August November

Additional specimens examined

China. Fujian: Minhou County, 4 Oct 2014, B. Chen & D.M. Jin CSH12700 (CSH); Nanjing County, 400 m, 19 Nov 1963, Xiamen Univ. Coll. Team 805 (PE); Pinghe County, 600 m, 23 Feb 1980, G.S. He 0475 (FJSI); Zhao’an County, 950 m, 16 Mar 2015, X.F. Zeng ZXF19893 (CZH). Guangxi: Jinxiu Yao Autonomous County, 200 m, 6 Apr 1982, Dayao Shan Expedition Team 13973 (IBSC); Shangsi County, Shiwandashan, 370–390 m, 14 Nov 2011, D.X. Nong et al. FC2011061 (GXMG). Guangdong: Dinghu District, 8 Nov 1963, G.Q. Ding & G.L. Shi 1132 (IBSC); Fengkai County, 15 Nov 1980, G.Q. Ding & G.L. Shi 6652 (CDBI); Ruyuan Yao Autonomous County, 17 Aug 1935, S.K. Lau 23948 (IBK); Huaiji County, 500 m, 26 Oct 1958, Y.G. Liu 2707 (HHBG); Yangchun City, 6 Nov 1935, C. Wang 38672 (IBK, PE); Chao’an District, 900 m, 18 Oct 2009, X.F. Zeng ZXF8404 (CZH); Conghua District, 600 m, 4 Dec 1958, L. Deng 8836 (IBK); Shenzhen City, 300–350 m, 20 Sept 2006, G.D. Wang et al. 6474 (SZG); Boluo County, 444.6 m, 1 Apr 2019, Y. Yang OYY00121 (KUN). Hainan: Baoting Li and Miao Autonomous County, 6 May 1935, F.C. How 72211 (IBK); Changjiang Li Autonomous County, 7 Jun 1934, H.Y. Liang 64162 (IBK); Baisha Li Autonomous County, 29 Apr 1936, S.K. Lau 26548 (IBK); Lingshui Li Autonomous County, 21 Oct 1956, L. Deng 2785 (KUN).

Sageretia lucida Merr. in Lingn. Sci. Journ. 7: 314. 1931.

Fig. 8

Type material

China. Guangdong: “Ying Tak, Taai Tsan, Chung Tung” (Yingde City, Taizhen Town, Zhongdong Village), 24 Nov 1926, W.T. Tsang & K.C. Wong 3260 (holotype UC [319815]; isotypes A [00051501], SYS [SYS00095840], US [00094394]).

Figure 8. 

Isotype of Sageretia lucida (US [00094394]). Image obtained from GBIF.


Shrubs up to 3 m. Branches alternate, glabrous; second- to fourth-year branches gray to dark gray. Leaves alternate; petioles 6–10 mm, leaf blades leathery, ovate-oblong to oblong, 5–10 × 2.5–4 cm, lateral veins 4–6 pairs, prominent abaxially, impressed adaxially, base sub-rounded to rounded, margin serrulate, apex acuminate. Inflorescences axillary spicate; rachis 5–10 cm. Flowers sessile; sepals triangular-ovate, 1.2–1.5 mm long; petals clawed; stamens as long as petals. Fruits unknown.


Flowering in November; fruits unknown, probably ripening from April to May of the next year.

Distribution and habitat

The species is endemic to Yingde, Guangdong, China (Fig. 2). It probably grows in thickets on limestone mountains at elevation ca. 700 m.


Sageretia lucida is closest to S. henryi Drumm. & Sprague in morphology and sharing similar limestone habitats and flowering in autumn. Thus, Merrill and Chun (1940) synonymized S. lucida to S. henryi. Chen and Schirarend (2007) disagreed with the synonymization of S. lucida because S. henryi was factually compared with S. ellipsoidea rather than the true S. lucida in their study. Nonetheless, we have limited knowledge on S. lucida so far because of the lack of field collections, and so know nothing about the fruits. In order to get more information on the species, we conducted investigations at the type location of S. lucida (Zhongdong Village) during early summer in 2016 and autumn in 2020, respectively, but failed to find any individuals. Consequently, we suggest to suspend the synonymization of S. lucida to S. henryi until more evidence has been obtained.

Additional specimens examined

China. Guangdong: Yingde City, Zhongdong Village, 13 Nov 1926, W.T. Tsang & K.C. Wong 3114 (SYS).


We thank Dr. Xin-xin Zhu (College of Life Sciences, Xinyang Normal University) and Mr. Jian Lin for providing field photos of Sageretia thea and S. ellipsoidea, respectively. We are grateful to Mrs. Yun-xiao Liu (South China Botanical Garden, CAS) for the line drawings. We also thank the curators of IBSC, KUN, PE and SYS, and Mr. Kai-wen Jiang (Southwest Forestry University) for their assistance with specimen examination. This study is jointly supported by the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (STEP) program (Grant No. 2019QZKK0502) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31560064).


  • Chen YL, Chou PK (1979) Materiae ad floram Rhamnacearum sinicarum. Bulletin of Botanical Laboratory of North-East Forest Institute 5: 73–94. [in Chinese]
  • Chen YL, Schirarend C (2007) Sageretia Brongn. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, Hong DY (Eds) Flora of China, vol. 12. Science Press, Beijing & Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, 115–133.
  • Chen YL, Zhou BK (1986) Rhamnaceae. In: Wu ZY (Ed.) Flora Xizangica, vol. 3. Science Press, Beijing, 199–222. [in Chinese]
  • Chung SK, Chen OCY, Blumberg JB (2009) Flavonoid-rich fraction from Sageretia theezans leaves scavenges reactive oxygen radical species and increases the resistance of low-density lipoprotein to oxidation. Journal of Medicinal Food 12(6): 1310–1315.
  • Fan GS (2006) Rhamnaceae. In: Wu CY (Ed.) Flora Yunnanica, vol. 12. Science Press, Beijing, 680–749. [in Chinese]
  • Fan GS, Deng LL (1997) Two species of Rhamnaceae from Yunnan, China. Sida 17(4): 677–680.
  • Handel-Mazzetti H (1933) Anthophyta (3. Lieferung). In: Handel-Mazzetti H (Ed.) Symbolae Sinicae, vol. 7(3). Julius Springer, Wien, 449–730.
  • Liu YC, Lu FY, Ou CH, Wang CM (1993) Rhamnaceae. In: Huang TC (Ed.) Flora of Taiwan, 2nd edn. , vol. 3. Lungwei Printing Company, Taipei, 680–695.
  • Mabberley DJ (2008) Mabberley’s plant-book: a portable dictionary of plants, their classification and uses (3rd edn.). Cambridge University Press, 1040 pp.
  • Merrill ED (1931) Unrecorded plants from Kwangdung Province II. Lingnan Science Journal 7: 297–326.
  • Merrill ED, Chun WY (1940) Additions to our knowledge of the Hainan flora, III. Sunyatsenia 5(1–3): 1–200.
  • Thiers B (2020) Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium.
  • Yang Y, Chen YS, Zhang JW, Sun L, Sun H (2019) Phylogenetics and historical biogeography of the mock buckthorn genus (Sageretia, Rhamnaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 189(3): 244–261.
login to comment