Silene sunhangii (Caryophyllaceae), a new species from China

Nan Lin; Dai-Gui Zhang; Xian-Han Huang; Jian-Wen Zhang; Jing-Yuan Yang; Komiljon Tojibaev; Heng-Chang Wang; Tao Deng

doi:10.3897/phytokeys.135.36426

Research Article

Silene sunhangii (Caryophyllaceae), a new species from China

Nan Lin^‡§|, Dai-Gui Zhang^¶, Xian-Han Huang^‡|, Jian-Wen Zhang^‡, Jing-Yuan Yang^#, Komiljon Tojibaev^¤, Heng-Chang Wang^§, Tao Deng^‡

‡ Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China

§ Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China

| University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

¶ Jishou University, Jishou, China

# Administration of Shennongjia National Park, Shennongjia, China

¤ Institute of Botany, Academy Sciences of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Corresponding author: Heng-Chang Wang ( hcwang@wbgcas.cn )

Corresponding author: Tao Deng ( dengtao@mail.kib.ac.cn )

Academic editor: Gian Pietro Giusso del Galdo

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Citation: Lin N, Zhang D-G, Huang X-H, Zhang J-W, Yang J-Y, Tojibaev K, Wang H-C, Deng T (2019) Silene sunhangii (Caryophyllaceae), a new species from China. PhytoKeys 135: 59-69. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.135.36426

Abstract

Silene sunhangii, a new species of Caryophyllaceae known from only three populations in Hubei and Hunan provinces of central China, is described. Both morphological and molecular data were used to assess the taxonomic status and relationships of this species. Morphologically, S. sunhangii is most similar to S. platyphylla Franch. from which it differs most readily in having 3-veined elliptical leaves without pubescence, tasseled catacorolla, pale purple to red petals without a linear lobe or narrow tooth and lanceolate, bifid to one third. A phylogenetic analysis based on nuclear ITS region identified the new species as a well-supported, independent lineage. Our new species is nested within a grade that encompasses species representing a polyphyletic Silene sect. Physolychnis (Benth.) Bocquet. Both the genetic and morphological data support the recognition of Silene sunhangii as a distinct species, although there is inconsistency between these two datasets as to the relationships of the new species.

Keywords

Silene, new species, morphology, phylogeny, China

Introduction

Silene L. (Sileneae, Caryophyllaceae) is the largest genus of Caryophyllaceae Juss., containing over 700 species (Melzheimer 1988; Rautenberg et al. 2010; Oxelman et al. 2011). It is distributed mainly in the Northern Hemisphere, but some species also occur in Africa and South America (Oxelman et al. 2011). Morphologically, Silene is characterized by having a synsepalous calyx, 3–5 carpels and a campanulate, clavate or ovate calyx tube. de Candolle (1824) had recognized just eight sections, using several morphological features, including those of habit, inflorescences and stems. Using life form as the primary character, Boissier (1867) recognized 31 sections for the genus, 11 containing annual species and 20 containing perennial species. Previously, the sectional classification within Silene was subsequently revised by Chowdhuri (1957) who recognized 44 sections, and it is this scheme that remains in place today. That study was based on a comprehensive sampling of species and a re-assessment of morphological characters. Uncertainties exist as to the number of subgenera that should be recognized for the genus. Rohrbach (1868) recognized two subgenera (subg. Silene and subg. Behenantha (Otth) Endl., based on seed characters) while Williams (1896) recognized three subgenera (subg. Gastrosilene Williams, subg. Conosilene Williams and subg. Eusilene Williams, based on calyx characters). Recent molecular studies (Oxelman et al. 1997; Petri and Oxelman 2011) support the subdivision of Silene into two major clades which correspond to subg. Silene and subg. Behenantha. Notwithstanding the above, deficiencies still exist within current classifications involving the genus and a comprehensive phylogenetic study is needed, especially as there is a suggestion in the results of both Oxelman et al. (1997) and Petri and Oxelman (2011) that Silene may be polyphyletic.

The treatment of Silene by Zhou et al. (2001) in the Flora of China recognized 110 species, of which 67 are endemic and geographically restricted within the country. Within China, species of Silene are widely distributed and show a large range of morphological variation. Historically, these species have been accommodated in 22 sections that were defined mostly by characters of the stems, petals, calyx and seeds (Zhou et al. 2001).

Field investigations conducted during this study revealed the existence of a distinctive entity of Silene in Hubei and Hunan provinces. Morphologically, this entity is most similar to S. platyphylla Franch. which occurs in Yunnan, but it differs significantly from that species in the characters of its root, leaves, petals, catacorolla and lobes. These morphological differences are supported by molecular evidence that justify the recognition of the Hubei and Hunan entity as a new species of Silene for China. It is therefore described below as Silene sunhangii.

Material and methods

Morphology

Natural populations of the new species were collected from three populations in Hubei and Hunan province (Fig. 1, these data were submitted to PANGAEA, accession number 10.1594/PANGAEA.906581). Morphological characters recorded for the new species were based on fresh flowering and fruiting material collected from those populations. S. platyphylla were from herbarium material (KUN). A comparison of the new species with similar species is provided in Table 1.

Figure 1.

Distribution map of Silene sunhangii. The black dots represent locations of S. sunhangii.

Table 1.

Download as

CSV

XLSX

Comparison of Silene sunhangii with similar species detected by morphology (S. platyphylla).

Species	Characters
Species	S. sunhangii	S. platyphylla
Roots	tuberous	cylindric
Stems	diffuse, 30–80 cm tall, long pubescent	diffuse, 60–100 cm tall, pubescent
Leaves	elliptic, 4–10 × 1–5 cm, glabrous, conspicuously 3-veined	ovate, 6–8 × 3–5 cm, margin ciliate, 3 or 5-veined
Flower diameter	35–40 mm	20 mm
Pedicel length &indumentum	20–30 mm, pubescent	10–30 mm, hairy
Calyx	tubular-clavate, teeth triangular, glabrous	tubular-clavate, teeth triangular-lanceolate with margin ciliate
Petals	pale purple to red, 2.5 cm, catacorolla tasseled, bifid to one third, lobes lanceolate, without a linear lobe or narrow tooth on each side	white or pale red, 2 cm, catacorolla elliptical or linear, bifid to middle, lobes elliptic, with a linear lobe or narrow tooth on each side
Stamens and filaments	stamens and filaments slightly exserted; filaments pubescent	stamens slightly exserted; filaments glabrous
Distribution	China: Western Hubei and north-western Hunan	China: Western Yunnan

Molecular analyses

Fresh leaves of the new species were dried in silica gel and total genomic DNA was extracted from 10–20 mg dried leaf tissue. Molecular material of S. platyphylla was collected from herbarium specimens (Appendix 1). The nuclear ITS locus was used for phylogeny. The PCR protocol used the following conditions: 5 min at 94, followed by 35 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 53 °C, 2 min at 72 °C and then ending with a final extension of 5 min at 72 °C. The ITS primers used were ITS1 and ITS4, as described by White et al. (1990) and Urbatsch et al. (2000). Voucher specimen and GenBank accession information for taxa are listed in Appendix 1. DNA sequences were aligned using MAFFT software and then manually checked (Katoh et al. 2002). A total of 301-taxon data sets, including two newly published sequences, were obtained. Bayesian inference (BI) and Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses were conducted using MrBayes 3.1.2 and RAxML v.6 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001; Stamatakis 2006), respectively. The best-fitting substitution models GTR for Bayesian inference were selected using ModelTest v.3.8, and branch support was computed with 1, 000 bootstrap replicates (Posada and Crandall 1998). ML analyses were conducted using the GTRGAMMA model with 1, 000 nonparametric bootstrapping replicates.

Results and discussion

Taxonomic treatment

Silene sunhangii D.G.Zhang, T.Deng & N.Lin, sp. nov.

urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77203328-1

Figs 1, 2, 3

Type

China. Hubei Province: Shennongjia National Nature Reserve (SNNR) region, Guanmen Mountain, Alt. 1,319 m, 30°08'16.80"N, 110°34'33.59"E, 1 July 2010, Dai-Gui Zhang, et al. 0622 (holotype: KUN!).

Diagnosis

Silene sunhangii is morphologically similar to S. platyphylla, from which it differs through the root tuberous (not cylindric as S. platyphylla), stems 30–80 cm tall (100 cm tall in S. platyphylla), leaves elliptic (not obovate in S. platyphylla), 3-veined (not 3/5 veined in S. platyphylla) and glabrous (not margin ciliate as S. platyphylla), flowers 35–40 mm diam. (not 20 mm in S. platyphylla), petals purple to red (not white or pale red in S. platyphylla), catacorolla tasseled (not elliptic or linear in S. platyphylla), lobe limbs divided to 1/3 (more than 1/3 in S. platyphylla).

Description

Herbs perennial. Plant with densely ciliate, tuberous roots and dichasial cymose inflorescences containing many flowers. Stems diffuse, 30–80 cm tall, much-branched, pubescent. Leaves elliptic, 4–10 × 1–5 cm, glabrous, conspicuously 3-veined. Pedicel 20–30 mm long, pubescent. Calyx tubular-clavate, ca. 1.5–2 cm long, densely hairy on veins; teeth triangulate, ciliate. Petals pale purple to red, ca. 2.5 cm long; claws exserted beyond calyx; catacorolla tasseled, limbs obovate, bifid to 1/3; lobes lanceolate, without a linear lobe or narrow tooth on each side. Stamens slightly exserted; filaments pubescent. Capsule ovoid, 10–20 mm long. Seeds dark brown, reniform, ca. 1 mm long, with lateral auricular pits (Fig. 2, 3).

Figure 2.

Silene sunhangii (from the holotype plant). A plant habit B plant C leaf D flower E calyx F open capsule. Scale bar: 20 cm (A, B), 1 cm (C, D, E, F).

Figure 3.

1–5 Silene platyphylla Franchet (modified from illustration in flora of China), 6–10 Silene sunhangii, 1, 6 flowering branch 2, 7 sterile branch 3, 8 petal and stamen 4, 9 pistil 5, 10 root.

Phenology

Flowering occurs from February to April, and fruiting from April to June.

Etymology

The new species is named in honor of Chinese botanist, Prof. Hang Sun, who has made significant contributions to the flora of China.

Distribution, habitat and conservation status

Silene sunhangii is presently known from only Hubei and Hunan provinces in central China (Fig. 1). It grows in humid and evergreen or deciduous mixed forest, from 1214–2227 m (Fig. 1). A total of three natural populations have been located, each comprising less than 100 individuals distributed over an area not exceeding 100 m². These populations are located within the Shennongjia National Nature Reserve (Hubei province), Houhe Nature Reserve (Hubei Province) and Huping Mountains (Hunan Province), and are therefore well-protected; there are no known threats to these populations. Further field studies are needed to more authoritatively determine the geographic range and frequency of this species. In the meantime, current evidence indicates that Silene sunhangii should be assigned the conservation status of “Data Deficient (DD)”, following the IUCN Red List Criteria and Categories (IUCN 2017).

Taxonomic notes

Silene sunhangii is a perennial with densely ciliate, tuberous roots and dichasial cymose inflorescences containing many flowers. These characters indicate that the new species should be assigned to Silene sect. Cucubaloideae subsect. Silene Chowdhuri. It can be distinguished from all other species of Silene that possess lilac to red petals through its root, stem, leaf and corolla characters as described above. Morphologically, Silene sunhangii shows greatest similarities with S. platyphylla. The diagnosis above enables the two species to be reliably distinguished. Silene platyphylla is distributed in western Yunnan.

Molecular phylogenetic analysis

The results of our initial phylogenetic analysis, which included over 300 species, are not shown here but they did confirm the position of the new species within Silene. In Fig. 4, we present only those clades (38 species from that original matrix) which are relatively close to the new species. Due to the vagueness of outgroup, we constructed unrooted phylogenetic tree based on 38-taxon of Silene (Fig. 4). Clades associated with Silene platyphylla are also included because morphological criteria indicate that this species has similarities with S. sunhangii.

The aligned matrix consisted of 676 characters from 38 species, of which 165 were variable and 82 were parsimony-informative. Our results based on ITS produced trees with identical topology between BI and ML, and only the tree with bootstrap support values from ML analyses was presented (Fig. 4). According to these results, Silene sunhangii is nested within a grade that incorporates a polyphyletic Sect. Physolychnis (Benth.) Bocquet. S. sunhangii is shown to be separated from associated taxa with very high support (BS = 97, PP = 1), and is well-removed from S. platyphylla. These results differ from those of the morphological study which placed S. sunhangii in sect. Cucubaloideae and showed it to be morphologically most similar to S. platyphylla. As already noted, Sect. Physolychnis was resolved as polyphyletic. This section was shown to include the ‘S. ajanensis group’, an Asian clade, an American clade, and miscellaneous other species. These results are consistent with those of a previous study by Petri and Oxelman (2011). An unexplainable result was that S. platyphylla was well-separated from S. sunhangii, and included within a clade containing species of Sect. Cucubaloideae Edgew. et Hook. f.. These genetic results do clearly support the morphological data in recognizing Silene sunhangii as a distinct species. However, relationships of the new species do require further investigation.

Figure 4.

Phylogeny of Silene species studied based on ITS region and only bootstrap values >50% are shown. The colored taxa with identical color represent which are from same sect.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the herbarium curators who helped us in our study.

Special thanks to Ling Wang for her excellent illustrations of S. sunhangii. The authors are grateful to B.R. Maslin for revising manuscript. Thanks are also due to the reviewers for their useful suggestions.

This study was supported by Conservation Technology Research and Demonstration of Rare and Endangered Plants in Shenlongjia National Park (2018ACA132), Hubei Key Laboratory of Shenlongjia Snub-nosed Monkey Conservation Fund (2018SNJ0009), the Key Projects of the Joint Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1802232), the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (STEP) program (2019QZKK0502), the Major Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31590823), the National Key R & D Program of China (2017YFC0505200), the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA20050203), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31700165), Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (2019382), Young Academic and Technical Leader Raising Foundation of Yunnan Province (2019HB039).

References

Boissier E (1867) Flora Orientalis (Vol. 1). Georg H., Basel, Geneva, 567–656.

Chowdhuri PK (1957) Studies in the Genus Silene, 22. Notes from the Royal Bot. ,Garden Edinburgh 22: 221–278.

de Candolle AP (1824) Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, sive,enumeratio contracta ordinum generum specierumque plantarum huc usquecognitarium, juxta methodi naturalis, normas digesta. Treuttel et Wurtz, Paris, 745 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.286

Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 17(8): 754–755. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754

IUCN (2017) Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria, Version 13. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee, 108 pp. http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf

Katoh K, Kei KM, Kuma KI, Miyata T (2002) MAFFT: A novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Research 30(14): 3059–3066. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkf436

Melzheimer V (1988) Caryophyllaceae: Silene L. In: Rechinger KH (Ed.) Flora Iranica,163, Akad. Druck- und Verlagsanstalt., Graz, Austria, 341–508.

Oxelman B, Lidén M, Berglund D (1997) Chloroplast rps16 intron phylogeny of the tribe Sileneae (Caryophyllaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 206: 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987959

Oxelman B, Rautenberg A, Thollesson M, Larsson A, Frajman B, Eggens F (2011) Sileneae taxonomy and systematics. http://www.sileneae.info

Petri A, Oxelman B (2011) Phylogenetic relationships within Silene (Caryophyllaceae) section Physolychnis. Taxon 60(4): 953–968. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.604002

Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) MODELTEST: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 14(9): 817–818. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817

Rautenberg A, Hathaway L, Oxelman B, Prentice HC (2010) Geographic and phylogenetic patterns in Silene section Melandrium (Caryophyllaceae) as inferred from chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 57: 978–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2010.08.003

Rohrbach P (1868) Monographie Der Gattung Silene. W. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.15462

Stamatakis A (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 22(21): 2688–2690. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446

Urbatsch LE, Baldwin BG, Donoghue MJ (2000) Phylogeny of the coneflowers and relatives (Heliantheae: Asteraceae) based on nuclear rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences and chlorplast DNA restriction site data. Systematic Botany 25: 539–565.

White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (Eds) PCR Protocols: a Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, New York, 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1

Williams FN (1896) A revision of the genus Silene L. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 32(220–227): 1–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1896.tb00695.x

Zhou LH, Wu ZY, Magnus L, Oxelman B (2001) Silene Linnaeus. Flora of China. Science Press, Beijing, 66–100. https://doi.org/10.2478/dna-2013-0004

Appendix 1

Download as

CSV

XLSX

Vouchers information and GenBank accession of species used in our study.

Species	GenBank accessions	Herbarium voucher specimens
Silene ajanensis Vorosch.	KX757376	Anja Rautenberg 68 UPS
Silene samojedorum (Sambuk) Oxelman	JX274522	–
Silene villosula (Trautv.) V.V.Petrovsky & Elven	KX757382	Afonina et al. 1983. Vii. 23 S
Silene linnaeana Vorosch.	KX757383	H. Wilh. Arnell S
Silene involucrata (Cham. & Schltdl.) Bocquet	KX757387	Greve Alsosreas Tribsch O
Silene sachalinensis F. Schmidt	KX757394	Popov 1949.Vii.8 LE
Silene tolmatchevii Bocquet	KX757396	M.Karavaev 1945.Vii.6 LE
Silene caespitella F.N. Williams	KX757337	KGB 113 GB
Silene andicola Gillies ex Hook. & Arn.	KX757338	–
Silene violascens (Tolm.) V.V.Petrovsky & Elven	KX757343	H. Solstad, R. Elven 04/1353 O
Silene chilensis (Naudin) Bocquet	KX757359	B. Frajman, P. Schonswetter 12153
Silene echegarayi (Hieron.) Bocquet	KX757360	B. Frajman, P. Schonswetter 12176
Silene zawadzkii Herbich	KX757363	Cernoch F 47354 M
Silene davidii (Franch.) Oxelman & Lidén	KX757367	Frida Eggens 86 UPS
Silene salicifolia C.L. Tang	KX757372	Tang 1225 KUN
Silene nepalensis Majumdar	JF978562	KIB-D389
Silene keiskei Miq.	DQ908643	–
Silene suksdorfii B.L. Rob.	DQ908670	–
Silene uralensis subsp. apetala	JX274519	–
Silene aprica Turcz. (L.) Bocquet	JF978553	A519
Silene campanulata subsp. glulosa	DQ908635	clone 2459
Silene adenocalyx F.N. Williams	KX757269	Poelt J. M
Silene khasiana Rohrb.	KX757270	Einarsson et.al 3025 UPS
Silene waltoni F.N. Williams	KX757272	G. S. Miehe 03-048-12 Miehe
Silene kumaonensis F.N.Williams	KX757273	G. S. Miehe 01-109-08 Miehe
Silene rosiflora Kingdon-Ward	KX757277	G. Miehe SonamCo L.Opgenoorth 04-086-01 Miehe
Silene otodonta Franch.	KX757282	G.Miehe, U.Wuendisch 94-141-15 Miehe
Silene asclepiadea Franch.	KX757283	Boufford D. E. et al. 35267 M
Silene cardiopetala Franch.	KX757284	Liden 4-17
Silene grandiflora Franch.	KX757286	KGB 275 GB
Silene batangensis H. Limpr.	KX757288	Miehe 07-26-07 Miehe
Silene williamsii (Britton) Hultén	KX757298	C. Brochmann H. H Grundt
Silene acutifolia Link ex Rohrb.	KX757318	Bengt Oxelman 2554 GB
Silene almolae J.Gay	KX757424	Merxmueller H. & Lippert W. 25372 M
Silene menziesii Hook.	DQ908651	–
Silene seelyi C.V. Morton & J.W. Thomps.	DQ908666	–
Silene sunhangsii	–	KUN060722
Silene platyphylla Franch.	–	KUN0514438