Research Article |
Corresponding author: Bao-Dong Liu ( 99bd@163.com ) Corresponding author: Hui Shang ( shanghui@csnbgsh.cn ) Academic editor: Blanca León
© 2018 Morigengaowa, Jun-Jie Luo, Ralf Knapp, Hong-Jin Wei, Bao-Dong Liu, Yue-Hong Yan, Hui Shang.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Morigengaowa, Luo J-J, Knapp R, Wei H-J, Liu B-D, Yan Y-H, Shang H (2018) The identity of Hypolepis robusta, as a new synonym of Hypolepis alpina (Dennstaedtiaceae), based on morphology and DNA barcoding and the new distribution. PhytoKeys 96: 35-45. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.96.23470
|
Based on field observations and examinations of herbarium specimens (including type material), consulting the original literature and molecular phylogenetic analysis of the rbcL and trnL-F sequences, it is concluded that Hypolepis robusta is conspecific with Hypolepis alpina and is here formally treated as a synonym of it. Additionally H. alpina is reported with new distribution records in Guangdong, Guangxi and the Hainan Island of China, respectively.
Hypolepis alpina , molecular phylogenetic, synonym, taxonomy, Type material
Hypolepis Bernh. (1805) is one of the largest genera in the family Dennstaedtiaceae, with approximately 80 species (
The distributions of Hypolepis alpina noted by
For morphological comparisons, herbarium specimens or high-resolution images of specimens in
Nineteen specimens were sampled, including the outgroup taxa Blotiella stipitata (Alston) Faden and Histiopteris incisa (Thunb.) J. Sm., Pteridium aquilinum subsp. wightianum (J. Agardh) W.C. Shieh. Total genomic DNA was extracted from silica gel-dried leaves by using a DNA secure Plant Kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. The PCR reactions were performed in a Veriti 96-Well Thermal Cycler. Two plastid markers were amplified, the rbcL gene and the trnL-trnF intergenic spacer. Primers used for amplification and sequencing were: rbcL primers 1379R and 1F (
Sequences were assembled and edited with SeqMan (DNA STAR package; DNA StarInc., Madison, WI, USA), aligned by Bio Edit (
Plant materials, voucher information, and GenBank accession numbers of the samples used in the phylogenetic analyses.a
Taxon | Voucher | Locality | Geographic coordinates | GenBank accession number | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
rbcL | trnL-F | ||||
Hypolepis glandulifera Brownsey & Chinnock | BLD01 | Bali, Indonesia | NA | MG944782 | MG944788 |
Hypolepis robusta W.M. Chu | DRS005 | Darong Mountain, Guangxi, China | NA | MG944773 | MG944789 |
Hypolepis punctata (Thunb.) Mett. ex Kuhn | FLX6 | Hunan, China | NA | MG944784 | MG944790 |
Hypolepis tenuifolia (G. Forst.) Bernh. | HN31 | Wuzhishan Mountain, Hainan, China | 18°55'1"N, 109°42'13"E | MG944786 | MG944791 |
Hypolepis robusta W.M. Chu | HND6 | Bawang Mountain, Hainan, China | 19°07'26"N, 109°04'46"E | MG944774 | MG944792 |
Hypolepis alpina (Blume) Hook. | Knapp4486 | Yilan County, Taiwan, China | 24°49'N, 121°41'E | MG944769 | MG944794 |
Hypolepis robusta W.M. Chu | SG958 | Shengtang Mountain, Guangxi, China | NA | MG944777 | MG944801 |
Blotiella stipitata (Alston) Faden | SG1185 | Kenya | NA | MG944780 | MG944795 |
Pteridium aquilinum subsp. wightianum (J. Agardh) W.C. Shieh | SG1760 | Yunnan, China | NA | MG944787 | MG944796 |
Hypolepis robusta W.M. Chu | SG1812 | Ada Village, Fugong County, Yunnan, China | 26°49'5.6964"N, 98°53'36.715"E | MG944776 | MG944797 |
Hypolepis alpina (Blume) Hook. | SG1838 | Dulongjiang Village, Gongshan County, Yunnan, China | 27°41'11.004"N, 98°16'54.340"E | MG944771 | MG944798 |
Hypolepis alpina (Blume) Hook. | SG1871 | Dulongjiang Village, Gongshan County, Yunnan, China | 27°54'49.306"N, 98°20'37.03"E | MG944772 | MG944799 |
Hypolepis resistens (Kunze) Hook. | SG2900 | Bawangling Mountain, Hainan, China | 19°5'28"N, 109°10'59"E | MG944785 | MG944800 |
Hypolepis polypodioides (Blume) Hook. | SIWS28 | Sulawesi, Indonesia | NA | MG944783 | MG944802 |
Histiopteris incisa (Thunb.) J. Sm. | WYD016 | Guangdong, China | NA | MG944781 | MG944804 |
Hypolepis robusta W.M. Chu | WYD574 | Dawu Mountain, Guangdong, China | NA | MG944778 | MG944805 |
Hypolepis alpina (Blume) Hook. | YYH11628 | Xitou Village, Nantou County, Taiwan, China | NA | MG944770 | MG944803 |
Hypolepis robusta W.M. Chu | YYH12064 | Mengsong Village, Jinghong City, Yunnan, China | NA | MG944775 | MG944793 |
Hypolepis robusta W.M. Chu | ZXC8465 | Gulinqing Village, Maguan County, Yunnan, China | 22°51'43.64"N, 104°0'15.59"E | MG944779 | MG944806 |
For phylogeny reconstructions, two methods were used, maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI). The ML analyses were conducted with RAxML-HPC BlackBox8.2.10 (
For species delimitation between H. alpina and the other species of Hypolepis, the DNA barcoding gap method, based on the Kimura two parameter (K2P) distance, was used. Intra- and inter-taxa genetic distances were evaluated using MEGA 5.0 (
A total of 19 new sequences amongst the total of 19 specimens were generated in the cpDNA matrix of rbcL and trnL-F containing 2,166 bp characters with 374 variable sites and 149 parsimony-informative sites. The optimal ML tree showed a negative log-likelihood score (-lnL) of 5577.824547 and the Bayesian tree was consistent with the ML tree. The statistical support is shown along the branches (ML/BI). Individuals of H. alpina and H. robusta formed a highly supported monophyletic group with an MLBS of 100 as sister clades of H. tenuifolia. Moreover, all rbcL and trnL-F sequences of the H. robusta, from type locality, were identical to those of H. alpina from Taiwan. The sequences of H. robusta from Guangdong, Guangxi and from Hainan Island were also clustered in the H. alpina clade, which had an MLBS of 100 (Fig.
No differences were observed in the rbcL and trnL-F barcoding sequences of both H. alpina and H. robusta, except that two specimens have two base differences respectively. The genetic distance between H. robusta and H. alpina ranges from zero to 0.002. Their inter-taxon distances were significantly larger than their intra-taxon distances compared with the other species of Hypolepis and the ratio between the minimum inter-taxon distance and the maximum intra-taxon distance is 11 (Fig.
Hypolepis robusta was first reported by
One of the main differences of H. robusta and H. alpina (H. alte-gracillima), mentioned in the key in Flora Yunnanica, is that the former has a few adventitious buds growing on both sides of the stipe base (
Another character used to support H. robusta as a new species was its larger size than H. alpina. The latter was reported at higher altitudes in the Malaysian region, from about 1,500–3,500 m and also as low as 1,100 m on Mt Kinabalu in Borneo (
The characters of the indusium have been widely used in fern taxonomy. According to the previous literature of H. alpina and H. robusta (
In addition to the morphological identification, a molecular phylogenetic analysis was also undertaken. The phylogenetic analysis of the rbcL and trnL-F sequences strongly supported the monophyly of H. alpina and H. robusta as a phylogenetic species with a wide distribution and distantly related to H. polypodioides (Fig.
To sum up, not only does the morphological comparison identify H. robusta and H. alpina as conspecies, but also the phylogeny analysis identifies these as conspecies. Therefore, H. robusta is here reduced to a synonym of H. alpina. Consequently, H. alpina has three new distribution records in Guangdong, Guangxi and Hainan Island of China (Fig.
Hypolepis alpina (Blume) Hook. (1852: 63). Cheilanthes alpina Blume (1828: 138). Cheilanthes dissecta Hook. & Arn. (1841: 75). Hypolepis dissecta (Hook. & Arn.) Brack. (1854: 89–90). Hypolepis alte-gracillimaHayata (1915: 295–297).
Type: Indonesia. Java: Jawa Barat, Gede, Blume C. L. (Lectotype: L-0051753!, L-0051754!).
= Hypolepis robusta W. M. Chu (1992: 36), syn. nov.
China. Yunnan: Fugong County, 1980, W. M. Chu (Holotype: PYU-01017821!, PYU-01017822!, PYU-01017823!, PYU-01017824!).
Fronds up to 1.7 m high. Rhizome long-creeping, 2–10 mm diameter, densely covered in red-brown hairs up to 3 mm long. Stipes reddish-brown, 12–70 cm long, 1.5–13 mm diameter, grooved adaxially, covered in red-brown non-glandular hairs up to 2 mm long and shorter glandular hairs, few adventitious buds at both sides of the stipe base; lamina ovate in outline, 3– or 4–pinnate, 20–80 (–130) cm × 10–90 cm, rachis red-brown or chestnut-brown at base, becoming chestnut-brown or yellow-brown at apex, densely covered in red-brown or chestnut-brown glandular hairs up to 0.5 mm long with occasional much longer non-glandular hairs; primary pinnae 15–30 pairs, opposite or sub-opposite, the largest at or near base, ovate to narrowly triangular, 10–52 cm × 3–28 cm; secondary pinnules narrowly ovate to ovate, 2–14 cm × 0.8–5 cm; ultimate pinnules to 10 mm × 5 mm. Sori circular or ovate, originating away from margins, without hairs between sporangia, protected by reflexed adaxial indusium, green at base and half membranaceous at margin, when the sori turn mature, the membranaceous margin becomes lacerated or exfoliated and the base part may turn white. Spores very pale under light microscope, perispores with interconnecting flattened projections, (32–) 34–37 (–40) µm × (20–) 21–25 (–28) μm.
China (Guangdong, Guangxi, Hainan, Taiwan, Yunnan), Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Papua New Guinea, Philippines.
We thank Yu-Feng Gu, Ke-Rui Huang, Xi-Le Zhou and Zu-Xia He for their help in field investigations; special thanks go to Yea-Chen Liu, Kuan-Yu Shen, Da-Jun Lin and Yi-Hsuan Hsu for their help in field investigations and for taking photographs of specimens in Taiwan. We are grateful to the editor Dr. Blanca León and two anonymous reviewers for their very valuable suggestion in improve our manuscript. This study was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) to Hui Shang (# 31700170) and Science and Technology Basic Work (2013FY112100).
Table S1
Data type: (measurement/occurence/multimedia/etc.)
Explanation note: Herbarium specimens information of Hypolepis alpina and Hypolepis robusta samples checked in this study.