Research Article
Print
Research Article
Nahuatlea: a new genus of compositae (Gochnatieae) from North America
expand article infoVicki A. Funk, Gisela Sancho§, Nádia Roque|
‡ Department of Botany, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, United States of America
§ Museo de La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil
Open Access

Abstract

In the course of a detailed molecular study of the tribe Gochnatieae (Compositae: Gochnatioideae) it became apparent that the genus Gochnatia (sensu Cabrera) was not monophyletic but composed of a number of morphologically, geographically, and molecularly distinct clades. All but one of these clades had previously been recognized at the generic or sectional level and therefore had a name that could be applied. However, one clade, whose members are from Mexico and adjacent parts of the United States, had never been recognized as a distinct taxon. The Mexican clade is the sister group of the Caribbean clade which seems to indicate a dispersal event from Southern South America to Mexico and from Mexico to the Caribbean. Here we provide the Mexican clade with a genus name, Nahuatlea, and make the necessary new combinations. The name is derived from Nahuatl, the major indigenous language that is spoken in the area where most of the collections were gathered. A genus description, key to species, images, and a short, species descriptions, are provided.

Keywords

Asteraceae, Gochnatia, Gochnatioideae, Mexico, Texas, Arizona, South American-Mexican disjunct distribution

Introduction

Cabrera (1971) in his comprehensive treatment of Gochnatia Kunth recognized six sections in the genus all mainly from the Americas. He placed all known species of Gochnatia from Mexico, in the section Hedraiophyllum (Less.) DC. along with two southern South American species: G. palosanto Cabrera and G. cordata Less., which are now part of Gochnatia s.s. and Moquiniastrum, respectively. Although one species from Mexico is rather widespread (it has been collected from a number of states in Mexico, a few counties in Texas, and there is one disjunct record from Arizona) all of the species can be found in Mexico (Figs 1, 2).

Figure 1. 

Distribution map of Nahuatlea arborescens and N. hypoleuca.

Figure 2. 

Distribution map of Nahuatlea hiriartiana, N. magna, N. obtusata, N. purpusii, and N. smithii.

Cabrera recognized five species of Gochnatia from Mexico and adjacent USA: G. arborescens Brandegee, G. hypoleuca (DC.) A. Gray, G. magna M.C. Johnson ex Cabrera, G. purpusii Brandegee, and G. smithii Robins. & Greenm. Gochnatia obtusata S.F. Blake, although accepted by Jervis (1954), was not accepted as a species by Cabrera (1971), instead it was placed as subspecies under the widespread G. hypoleuca. According to data from molecular studies (Funk et al. 2014), Gochnatia section Hedraiophyllum (Cabrera 1971) is not supported but it is interesting to note that Cabrera considered the section Hedraiophyllum to be somewhat artificial.

The next comprehensive treatment of Gochnatia was by Freire et al. (2002). In this treatment, the authors placed 21 species from South America in section Hedraiophyllum but not the Mexican species as Cabrera did (1971); in fact, their concept of this section was very different from Cabrera’s (1971). Freire et al. (2002) placed five species in Gochnatia sect. Leucomeris (D. Don) Cabrera, two of which were from Mexico: G. hypoleuca (including G. obtusata) and G. smithii. The other three species in G. sect. Leucomeris were distributed in Brazil, the Andean region of Bolivia and Argentina, and southeastern Asia. Freire et al. (2002) described a new section, G. sect. Glomerata S. E. Freire, L. Katinas & G. Sancho, consisting entirely of the final three Mexican species: G. arborescens, G. magna, G. purpusii. Freire et al. (2002) placed the Caribbean species (now in Anastraphia) in section Anastraphioides Jervis ex S.E. Freire, L. Katinas & G. Sancho. The molecular based study of Funk et al (2014) did not support the arrangement of taxa as proposed by Freire et al. (2002) except for section Anastraphioides (the Caribbean species) which formed a strongly supported clade.

In 2004 González-Medrano et al. described a new species of Gochnatia from Hidalgo, Mexico: G. hiriartiana Medrano, Villaseñor & Medina. It differs from all the other Mexican species because of its few, large heads, and greater number of disc flowers. The authors included a key to seven taxa: six species and the subspecies G. hypoleuca subsp. obtusata. The authors placed the new species in G. sect. Glomerata based on the key in Freire et al. (2002). It seems that González-Medrano et al. (2004) are the only authors to refer to the “Mexican species of Gochnatia” but they left them in two groups in different sections and never explicitly said that they thought the taxa formed a closely related group.

The recent molecular study of the tribe Gochnatieae (Funk et al. 2014) showed eight well-supported clades: most species had previously been included in the large genus Gochnatia.

All but one of the clades had previously been recognized at the generic or subgeneric level:

1) Gochnatia Kunth: Eight species from the Central Andes (more or less equal to G. sect. Gochnatia of Freire et al. 2002)

2) Pentaphorus D. Don: Southern Andean clade of two species that, at various times, had been recognized as a genus, subgenus, or section (resurrected by Hind 2007).

3) Mexican Gochnatia: A group of seven species that had never been recognized as a separate genus nor had they been placed in a section by themselves was recovered as a monophyletic group.

4) Anastraphia: The 33 Caribbean species fell into one strongly supported clade that had previously been recognized as a genus and a section (re-established as a genus by Ventosa and Herrera 2011a; Robinson and Funk 2012).

5) Moquiniastrum: The 21 species that form this clade are mainly from central and southern Brazil and previously formed the majority of Gochnatia sect. Moquiniastrum (Sancho et al. 2013).

6) Richterago Kuntze: A clade of 16 species, all endemic to the campos rupestres of Brazil (redefined by Roque and Pirani 2001, 2014).

7) Cnicothamnus Griseb.: A genus of two species found in Bolivia and northwestern Argentina: it has never been included in Gochnatia.

8) Cyclolepis Gilles ex D. Don: A monospecific genus that has never been included in Gochnatia: found from Paraguay to the northern Patagonia area of Argentina. This lineage was regarded as “incertae sedis” in Funk et al. (2014) and so it remains.

A key to the genera of Gochnatieae along with additional discussion on the tribe is contained in a upcoming paper (Funk et al. in prep).

In the Funk et al. biogeographic analysis (2014), it was hypothesized that the tribe had a southern South America origin (including the Central and Southern Andes, Argentina, and southern Brazil). Based on this, plus the fact that the Mexican clade is the sister group of the Caribbean clade (Anastraphia) suggests, or is best explained by, a dispersal event from Southern South America to Mexico and from Mexico to the Caribbean. We order the dispersal events in this direction because the Mexican Gochnatia are morphologically more similar to the Andean genus Gochnatia s.s. than the Caribbean species. This Mexican + Caribbean clade (MCC) is believed to have separated from the rest of the Gochnatieae between 11 and 23 mya at a time when there was a gradual climate warming (early Miocene; Petuch 2003, Zachos et al. 2001). MCC is the sister group of a large clade containing Richterago + Moquiniastrum (RM) which is mainly from Brazil and Southern South America. The sister groups to these two large clades (MCC + RM) are from the Andes (Gochnatia s.s., Pentaphorus, Cnicothamnus), so just where in southern South America the MCC clade originated is uncertain especially since some of the sister group relationships are not well supported, although all of the segregate genera are individually clearly monophyletic.

The Mexican members of Gochnatia clearly do not belong in the genus Gochnatia s.s., therefore, we are here describing the genus Nahuatlea for these seven species.

Materials and methods

All types and other specimens deposited at LP and US were examined. The remaining types were viewed on line using the JSTOR-GP portal (http://plants.jstor.org; Fig. 3).

Figure 3. 

Images of four type specimens: A Nahuatlea arborescens (UC holotype) B N. smithii (K lectotype) C N. obtusata (US holotype) D N. hypoleuca (G holotype). [Furnished by the respective herbaria.]

Distributions are based on data derived from databasing and georeferencing the collections at US (available online http://collections.mnh.si.edu/search/botany/) with additional records from ARIZ (http://ag.arizona.edu/herbarium/home), MEXU (http://unibio.unam.mx/minero/index.jsp?accion=sc&colecciones=MEXU,Herbario), MO (http://www.tropicos.org/Home.aspx), TEX (http://orchid.biosci.utexas.edu/Texas_list.html), and NY (http://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/vii2.asp). When possible, records from GBIF (http://www.gbif.org/occurrence) were also added. Figures 1 and 2 were produced using ArcGIS v.10.2 (ESRI 2011).

Taxonomy

Nahuatlea V. A.Funk

Description

Shrubs or trees, monoecious. Leaves sessile or with a short petiole of no more than 5 mm long, alternate, chartaceous or coriaceous, entire, margins revolute, usually discolorous (silvery or cinereous-tomentose beneath), clustered near the ends of the branches especially late in the flowering cycle. Heads arranged in clusters, rarely solitary, most branches with an apical cluster; sessile or short-pedunculate, peduncles commonly densely scaly-bracted resembling the lowermost involucral bracts, homogamous (flowers bisexual), discoid; involucre obconic (turbinate) or campanulate, shorter than the flowers; phyllaries imbricate, 4–10 seriate, graduate, coriaceous or subcoriaceous. Flowers with corollas homomorphic, white or yellow, actinomorphic, deeply 5-lobed, lobes equal or shorter than the tube, revolute; anthers calcarate, caudate, anther apical appendages apiculate, tails 1–3 mm long, entire or fimbrillate; styles rounded at apex, glabrous, style branches concave. Achenes 5-ribbed sericeous, cuneate-cylindrical, carpopodium conspicuous. Pappus of scabrid bristles, uni- or biseriate, graduated (varying in length) and equally wide throughout or rarely flattened at the tips, ca 1 cm long. [7 species]

Remarks

Nahuatlea, with some exceptions, is characterized by a combination of characters: short leafy branchlets, entire and revolute blade margins, clusters of sessile or short-pedunculate heads at or near the tips of branches; densely scaly-bracted peduncles (when present); and a pappus that is biseriate, graduated, and equally wide throughout. Most of the exceptions are found in the recently described Gochnatia hiriartiana (Medrano, Villasenor & Medina, 2004) which has solitary heads, and a uniseriate pappus with bristles that are flattened at the tips. However, recently produced sequence data including those of G. hiriartiana support Nahuatlea as monophyletic (Funk, unpublished).

Etymology

The genus name was selected to honor the indigenous people of eastern central Mexico by naming it after their language. The name is derived from Nahuatl, a language of the Nahuan branch of the Uto-Aztecan language family (known informally as Aztec). It is spoken by an estimated 1.5 million people, most of whom live in Central Mexico. Nahuatl has been spoken in Central Mexico since at least the 7th century AD and it was the language of the Aztecs who dominated what is now central Mexico during the Late Postclassic period of Mesoamerican history. Today the Nahuatl language is spoken in the Mexican states of Durango, Guerrero, Hidalgo, Mexico, Michoacan, Morelos, Oaxaca, Puebla, Tlaxcala, and Veracruz. The distribution of the new genus, Nahuatlea, in central Mexico has substantial overlap with the area so it is appropriate to use it for the name of the new genus (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nahuatl).

Key to species of Nahuatlea

1 Involucre campanulate or broadly obconic, bracts wooly tomentose or puberulous abaxially; corollas yellow 2
Involucre narrowly cylindrical or narrowly obconic, bracts glabrous (may be ciliolate); corollas white or yellow (the latter only in N. arborescens) 4
2 Heads with 200–230 flowers; involucre 25–35(–40) mm in diameter; corolla 13–22 mm long N. hiriartiana
Heads with 12–50 flowers; involucre 5–12 mm in diameter; corolla 8–12 mm long 3
3 Leaves 5–10 × 4–6.5 cm; involucre 10–12 mm wide; heads with ca. 50 flowers; 3–5 heads per cluster; pappus 9 mm long, bristles uni-seriate ; shrub or small tree 2.5–4.5 meters N. magna
Leaves 1.8–3.0 × 0.5–1.4 cm; involucre 5–6 mm wide; heads with 12–18 flowers; 10–15 heads per cluster; pappus 7.5 mm long, bi-seriate; shrub (no size given) N. purpusii
4 Leaves glabrescent abaxially; involucral bracts in 8–10 series; heads 6–8 mm wide; 13–20 flowers per head, corollas yellowish, 12 mm long; trees of 3–8 m, trunks 20–30 cm in diameter N. arborescens
Leaves tomentose abaxially; involucral bracts in 3–7 series (bracts on peduncle not included); heads ca. 3 mm wide; (3–)5–7 flowers per head, corollas white, 5–12 mm long; shrubs or small trees of 1–7 m, stems less than 10 cm in diameter 5
5 Leaves 4–8 mm × 3–5 mm, broadly ovate; leaves at the glomerule shorter than the heads; involucral bracts usually glabrous N. obtusata
Leaves 25–50 mm × 15–20 mm, oblong-lanceolate; leaves at the glomerule longer than the heads; involucral bracts ciliolate or ciliolate-tomentose on the margins 6
6 Involucral bracts in 5–7 series; corollas 8.5–9 mm long; anther tails entire; involucre 6–8 mm tall; shrub; blade oblong-lanceolate, apex acute, tomentose below N. smithii
Involucral bracts in 3–5 series; corollas 7–12 mm long; anther tails fimbrillate; involucre 4–7 mm tall; shrub to small tree; blade narrowly elliptic, apex rounded, mucronate, whitish-tomentose below N. hypoleuca

Nahuatlea hiriartiana (Medrano, Villaseñor & Medina) V.A.Funk, comb. nov.

Fig. 4

Gochnatia hiriartiana Medrano, Villasenor & Medina. Novon 14: 435–436. 2004.

Type

Mexico. Hidalgo: Municipio Meztitlán, 3 km al E de Milpa Grande, barranca sobre el Río Amajac, 19 Sep 1996, F. González-Medrano, G.G. Hernández & G. Rodriguez 17920 (Holotype: MEXU 00316791; Isotypes, IEB 000177217, MO 3024215, TEX 00208274, XAL 0106702).

Description

Shrub 1.0–1.5 m tall; leaves coriaceous, blades 1.0–3.5 × 1–2 cm, elliptic to slightly ovate, yellowish-tomentose below; heads sessile, solitary or in clusters of 2–3 at apex of branches, few clusters per plant; involucre campanulate, 15–20 mm tall × 25–35(–40) mm wide, bracts in 5–6 series, densely puberulous abaxially; flowers 200–230 per head; corollas light yellow, 13–22 mm long; anther base caudate, tails 2.0–2.5 mm long, entire; pappus ca. 1 cm long, bristles biseriate, broadening slightly at the apex.

Figure 4. 

Drawing of Nahuatlea hiriartiana. A Habit B Head C Flower with achene D Style E Apex of pappus bristles F Flower G Anthers H Anther apex I Anther tails. [Modified from González-Medrano et al. 2004.]

Distribution

Mexico: only known from two collections both in Hidalgo.

Nahuatlea magna (M.C. Johnst. ex Cabrera) V.A.Funk, comb. nov.

Fig. 5

Gochnatia magna M.C. Johnson ex Cabrera, Revista Mus. La Plata, Secc. Bot., 12(66): 147–150. 1971.

Type

Mexico. Tamaulipas: half a mile east of Nuevo Morelos, 25 Oct 1959, J. Graham & M.C. Johnston 4485 (Holotype: MEXU 01220108; Isotype: TEX 00374383).

Description

Shrub or small tree 2.5– 4.5 m tall; leaves chartaceous, blades 5–10 × 4.1–6.2 cm, widely elliptic, glabrescent adaxially, wooly abaxially; heads short pedunculate in clusters of 3–5 at the apex of branches, surrounded by leaves, few clusters per plant; involucre campanulate (especially at early flowering), 13–15 mm tall × 10–12 mm wide, bracts in 5–7 series, woolly adaxially; flowers ca. 50 per head; corollas yellow, 12 mm long; anther base caudate, tails ca. 1 mm long, entire; pappus ca. 9 mm long, bristles uniseriate, broadening, flattened, and somewhat darker at the apex.

Figure 5. 

Cabrera’s drawing of Nahuatlea magna. A Habit B Head C Flower D Style E Anther F Pubescence. [Modified from Cabrera 1971.]

Distribution

Mexico: Tamaulipas and San Luis Potosi.

Nahuatlea purpusii (T.S. Brandegee) V.A.Funk, comb. nov.

Fig. 6

Gochnatia purpusii T.S. Brandegee, Zöe 5(11): 240. 1906.

Type

Mexico. Puebla: Tehuacan, 1800 m, June 1905, C.A. Purpus 1164 (Holotype: UC 91904; Isotypes: BM 000947904, F 0050268, GH 00008382, NY 00169558, RSA 0001214). [Specimens at P (P00703338 & P00703339) and E (E00413001) have the correct collecting number but incorrect dates and may or may not be type material; Cabrera (1971) cites isotypes at G, MO, and MEXU that are not found in JSTOR-GP. MO has confirmed that the specimen is not in their collection but there is no information on the others.

Description

Shrub of unknown size (one isotype has what appears to be “5–6 m” written on the label); leaves coriaceous, petiole minute (1–2 mm), blade 1.8–3.0 × 0.5–1.4 cm, elliptical or slightly lanceolate or oblanceolate, glabrescent adaxially, white flocculent-tomentose abaxially; heads sessile, in few clusters of 8–15, clusters all at apex of branches; involucre campanulate (especially at early flowering), ca. 10 mm tall × 5–6 mm wide, bracts in 5–6 series, densely wooly abaxially; flowers 12–18 per head; corollas yellowish, ca. 8 mm long; anther base caudate, tails ca. 1 mm long, fimbrillate; pappus ca. 7.5 mm long, bi-seriate with slender bristles.

Figure 6. 

Cabrera’s drawing of Nahuatlea purpusii. A Habit B Head C Style D Achene with pappus E Anther F Style. [Modified from Cabrera 1971.]

Remarks

Cabrera (1971) and Jervis (1954) disagree somewhat on the size of the leaf blade: Cabrera lists it as 18–30 mm × 5–14 mm and Jervis has 2.0–2.5 cm × 0.5–1.0 cm. Our measurements, taken from the Holotype, fall within those given by Jervis, however, the isotypes may show the greater range given by Cabrera.

Distribution

Mexico: known only from four collections all from Puebla.

Nahuatlea arborescens (Brandegee) V.A.Funk, comb. nov.

Fig. 3B

Gochnatia arborescens Brandegee, Zoë 5(9): 163. 1903.

Type

Mexico. Baja California: Cañón de Santa María, El Juste, 1 Mar 1898, C.A. Purpus s.n. (Holotype: UC 91900; possible Isotypes: K 000502538; GH 00008379; US 00119526).

Note

Determining what may or may not be type material is difficult; all proposed types are Purpus s.n. collections but there are different collection dates and locality information. The Holotype is one of two different collections mounted on the same sheet one of which is annotated as “n. sp.” and “type”. That specimen also has a hand-written note that says “The year doubtless 1901 RM” indicating that the date on the sheet January-March 1898 is not correct. The information found on the three possible isotypes is nearly identical (Lower California, San Felipe, Cape Region Lower California, Jan-Mar 1901) but the information is different from the locality information on the Holotype. All of the “type material” specimens are the same species so there is little doubt that this is the correct name for this entity but someone more familiar with the work of Purpus (who seems to have confusing dates and numbers) and Brandegee will need to investigate this further to determine if the three listed specimens are actually isotypes.

Description

Tree 3–8 m tall, trunk 20–30 cm in diameter; leaves chartaceous, blades 3.5–6.5 cm × 2.5–4.5 cm, ovate to elliptic, cuneate or rounded at base, glabrescent on both faces; heads short-pedunculate, solitary or more usually in loose clusters of 2–20 at apex of branches, few clusters per plant; involucre cylindrical to narrowly obconic depending on age, 10–15(20) mm tall × 6–8 mm wide at anthesis, bracts in 8–10 series, glabrous; flowers 13–20 per head; corollas yellowish, 12 mm long; anther base caudate, tails ca. 3 mm long, entire; pappus ca. 11 mm long, bristles slender, biseriate.

Remarks

Cabrera (1971) and Jervis (1954) disagree somewhat on the size of the leaf blade: Cabrera lists it as 35–65 mm × 25–45 mm and Jervis has 5 cm × 3–4 cm. Specimens available to us agree with the range given by Cabrera.

Distribution

Mexico: known only from Baja California Sur.

Nahuatlea obtusata (S.F. Blake) V.A.Funk, comb. nov.

Figs 3D, 7

Gochnatia obtusata S.F. Blake, Contributions from the United States National Herbarium 22: 652. 1924.

Type

Mexico. Puebla: dry limestone hills at Tehuacan, 20 Dec 1895, C.G. Pringle 6253 (Holotype: US 00119530 [254705]; Isotypes: A 00008380, BM 000947903, BR 0000005318124, CM 2403, E 00413002, JE 00000693, K 000502539, GH 00008381, MEXU 01220107, MO 1544305, NDG 63791, NY 00169557, P 00703351, P 00703352, PH 00025961, S 10-11705, TEX 00000454, US 01100608). [Cabrera (1971) mentions additional specimens at F, G, M, UC, and W but these were not found in JSTOR-GP.]

Description

Shrub 1.0–1.5(–2.6) m tall; leaves coriaceous, (4.5)5–8(20) × 3–5 mm, broadly elliptic, apex rounded to obtuse, rounded at base, glabrous adaxially, cinereous-tomentose abaxially; heads short-pedunculate (ca. 2 mm long), in clusters of 10–20 heads, at apices of branches; involucre narrowly obconic, 6–8 mm tall × 2.8–3.2 mm wide, bracts in ca. 5 series, glabrous; flowers 5–6 per head; corollas white, 6.5–7.5 mm long; anther base caudate, tails ca. 2 mm long, fimbrillate; pappus 6.0–7.5 mm long, bristles biseriate, broadening slightly at the tips.

Jervis (1954) said that the leaf length is “rarely up to 2 cm” and the width is “less than 1 cm” and Cabrera (1971) lists the length as 4–20 × 3–13 mm. Both seem to be correct; we found only one specimen that had leaves 20 mm long and all but two were less than 1 cm.

Figure 7. 

Cabrera’s drawing of Nahuatlea hypoleuca. A Habit B Head C Floret D Style E Anther F Pubescence. [Modified from Cabrera 1971.]

Distribution

Mexico: Puebla and Oaxaca.

Remarks

Gochnatia obtusata was described by S. F. Blake (1924) and accepted as a good species by Jervis (1954). Cabrera placed it as a subspecies of G. hypoleuca as did Freire et al. (2002). The difference of opinion is based on the importance one gives to the characters that separate the two entities. Blake stated that G. hypoleuca could be separated from G. obtusata by the following characters: leaves chiefly elliptic, apex acute or acutish and mucronate, 20–50 mm × 8–15 mm; involucre 5–6 mm tall, phyllaries obtuse to acute or obtusely acuminate. We have added some additional characters: shrub or small tree 3–7 m; heads arranged in short clusters or panicles; involucre with bracts in 3–5 series; corolla 10–12 mm long; style branches 0.7–1 mm long; pappus up to 6.5 mm. In contrast, G. obtusata has the following: leaves broadly elliptic, apex broadly rounded to obtuse, not mucronate, 4.5–20 mm × 3–13 mm; involucre 6.5–7.5 mm tall, involucral bracts acute to sharply acuminate; style branches 0.5–0.7 mm long. Additional characters for G. obtusata include: shrub of 1.0–2.6 m; heads glomerate at tips of branches and in clusters of 1–several in the subterminal axils; involucre with bracts in 5-6 series; corollas 6.5–7.5 mm long; pappus up to 7.5 mm long. In the field the difference is striking with the larger more robust G. hypoleuca contrasting with the smaller, more compact G. obtusata. Therefore we have chosen to recognize G. obtusata as a separate species.

Nahuatlea hypoleuca (DC.) V.A.Funk, comb. nov.

Figs 3A, 8

Moquinia hypoleuca DC., Prodromus 7(1): 23. 1838.

Gochnatia hypoleuca (DC.) A. Gray, Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 19: 57. 1883.

Type

Mexico. Neuvo León: Monterrey, January 1828, Berlandier 1391 (Holotype: G 00223915; Isotypes: BM 000947902, GH 00010616, K 000502540, MO 100221306, NY 00230667, P 00703318, P 00703319, P 00703320, US 00119521). [There is a second specimen at NY that is a possible isotype NY 00230666; the specimen from HAL 0112991 may be an isotype but the dates don’t match and the number is listed at “1391 s.n.”]

Description

Shrub or small tree, 2–5(–7) m tall; leaves coriaceous, 2–5 × 0.9–1.5 cm, narrowly elliptic, apex obtuse, mucronate, attenuate at base, glabrous adaxially, cinereous-tomentose abaxially; heads sessile or very short pedunculate, in clusters of 5–15 heads at apices and axils of branches, many clusters per plant; involucre narrowly obconic, 4–7 mm tall × ca. 3 mm wide, bracts in ca. 3–5 series, ciliolate-tomentose on the margins but otherwise glabrous; flowers 5–7 per head; corollas white, 10–12 mm long; anther base caudate, tails ca. 1 mm long, fimbrillate; pappus ca. 6.5–7.5 mm long, bristles biseriate, of various lengths and broadening slightly at the tips.

Figure 8. 

Photos of Nahuatlea hypoleuca from southern Texas. Habit photo from La Puerta, Texas; Fruiting photo from Vaquillas Road, Texas; Flowers from Yturria Brush, Texas. [photos by T. F. Patterson.]

Figure 9. 

Photos of Nahuatlea obtusata, all from Oaxaca, Mexico, showing habit and flowering heads of different ages. [photos by V. A. Funk.]

Distribution

Mexico: Coahuila, Nuevo León, Tamaulipas, Durango, Zacatecas, San Luis Potosi, Queretaro, Hidalgo, and Michoacán. United States: Arizona, Texas.

Remarks

According to the Texas A&M University website (http://aggie-horticulture.tamu.edu/ornamentals/nativeshrubs/gochnatiahypole.htm) the common names for this shrub in Texas are Chomonque and Ocote. The website goes on to say that it is an “attractive, little-known shrub native to extreme South Texas, Chomonque flowers in the winter and has striking bi-colored leaves, very dark green on top and white and feltish underneath. The white flowers that appear from November to February are weakly fragrant and attract bees and many species of butterflies. It grows on gravel and caliche in South Texas shrub lands, and is extremely drought and heat tolerant. A specimen at the San Antonio Botanical Gardens has proved cold hardy and evergreen, but its cold-hardiness farther north is untested.” The website lists the USDA hardiness zone 9.

Nahuatlea smithii (B.L. Robinson & Greenm.) V.A.Funk, comb. nov.

Fig. 3C

Gochnatia smithii B.L. Robinson & Greenm., Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts 32: 50. 1896.

Type

Mexico. Oaxaca: On the hills of Cuicatlan, April 1895, L.C. Smith 363 (Lectotype: K designated by Cabrera, 1971: 140; Isolectotypes: GH 00008383, MEXU 00525748).

Description

Shrub of undetermined size; leaves clustered near the ends of the branches, sub-coriaceous, 3–5 × 0.8–1.8 cm, ovate, obtuse, cuneate at base, glabrescent adaxially, cinereous-tomentose abaxially; heads slender, short-pedunculate, in dense clusters at the ends of branches, sometimes several clusters in a dense panicle, many clusters per plant; involucre narrowly obconic, 6–8 mm tall × ca. 3 mm wide, bracts in 5–7 series, ciliolate on the margins otherwise glabrous; flowers (3–)5–7 per head; corollas white, 8.5–9.0 mm long; anther base caudate, tails ca. 1.5 mm long, entire; pappus ca. 6.5–7.5 mm long, bristles biseriate, not obviously broadened at tips.

Remarks

According to Jervis (1954) the “…small branches are less wooly than most other species.”

Distribution

Mexico: known only from Oaxaca.

Acknowledgements

No study of this type can be completed without the help of many people. Here we attempt to thank them; we hope we have not missed someone. We thank Thomas F. Patterson (TEX) for making several trips to find N. hypoleuca in Texas and for collecting leaf material on silica and taking beautiful photos; Tom Wendt (TEX) for supplying information on both N. hypoleuca in Texas and on the isotype of N. hiriartiana; Robert Mcgill (MO) for locating three missing isotypes; G, K, UC and US for providing high resolution images of the type material; JSTOR-GP for the always useful images of types from around the world (http://plants.jstor.org); Revista del Museo de La Plata for permission to use the drawings from Cabrera (1971); Alice Tangerini (US) for cleaning up the scans of the drawings and making the final plates for the type, photos and illustrations; Sara Alexander (US) for the final maps; Kenia Valesco (SERO) for help in the field searching for the elusive “Mexican Gochnatia”. Helpful reviews were provided by Michael Dillon (F) and Sterling Keeley (HAW) and the Phytokeys Asterales editor Alexander Sennikov. Of course we are very grateful for the funding provided by the following agencies without which this work would not have been possible: Smithsonian Institution (Peer Reviewed Grants), National Museum of Natural History (small grant program); Department of Botany (US) for providing a Cuatrecasas Travel Award for Roque who spent two months at US; ANPCyT and CONICET to G.S.; CNPq/Pq, REFLORA and PRONEM to N.R. One of the villages we stayed in on our trip to Oaxaca was La Ventosa, very close to Juichitan. The village was heavily impacted by the recent earthquake that hit Oaxaca, Mexico and some of our colleagues lost their homes and the newly opened cultural center was destroyed. If you are interested in helping please contact the corresponding author for information.

References

  • Cabrera A (1971) Revisión del Genero Gochnatia. Revista del Museo de la Plata, Sección Botánica 12(66): 1–160.
  • ESRI (2011) ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10. Environmental Systems Research Institute.
  • Freire SE, Katinas L, Sancho G (2002) Gochnatia (Asteraceae: Mutisieae) and the Gochnatia complex: taxonomic implications from morphology. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 89(4): 525–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/3298594
  • Funk VA, Sancho G, Roque N, Kelloff CL, Ventosa-Rodríguez I, Diazgranados M, Bonifacino JM, Chan R (2014) A phylogeny of Gochnatieae: Understanding a critically placed tribe in the Compositae. Taxon 63(4): 859–882.
  • González-Medrano F, Villaseñor JL, Medina R (2004) A New Species of Gochnatia (Asteraceae: Mutisieae) from the Desert Scrubland of the State of Hidalgo, Mexico. Novon 14(4): 434–436. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3393543
  • Gray A (1884) Contributions to North American Botany. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 19 [1883]: 1–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/25138721
  • Hind DJN (2007) Tribe Mutisieae. In: Kadereit JW, Jeffrey C (Eds) Part of series by Kubitzki K (Ed.) Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, vol. 8. Eudicots–Asterales. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 90–123.
  • Jervis RN (1954) A summary of the genus Gochnatia including a revision of the West Indian species which comprise the Section Anastraphioides. University of Michigan: unpublished thesis.
  • Robinson BL, Greenman JM (1896) VI. Descriptions of new or little known Phanerogams, chiefly from Oaxaca. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 32(1): 34–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/20020655
  • Robinson H, Funk VA (2012) Asteraceae. In: Acevedo-Rodríguez P, Strong MT (Eds) Catalogue of Seed Plants of the West Indies. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany 98: 89–142. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.0081024X.89
  • Roque N, Pirani JR (2001) Reinstatement of the name Richterago Kuntze and recircumscription of the genus to include species formerly treated as Actinoseris (Endl.) Cabrera (Compositae, Mutisieae). Taxon 50: 1155–1160. https://doi.org/10.2307/1224734
  • Sancho G, Freire SE (2009) The tribes Gochnatieae and Hyalideae. In: Funk VA, Stuessy TF, Susanna A, Bayer R (Eds) Systematics, Evolution, and Biogeography of Compositae. IAPT, Vienna, 249–260.
  • Ventosa-Rodriguez I, Herrera-Oliver PP (2011) Restoration of the name Anastraphia to define the species in the section Anastraphioides of Gochnatia (Gochnatioideae, Asteraceae). Compositae Newsletter 49: 23–37. https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/39009175