Research Article |
|
Corresponding author: Gan Xie ( xiegan@ibcas.ac.cn ) Corresponding author: Zhixi Fu ( fuzx2017@sicnu.edu.cn ) Academic editor: Alexander Sukhorukov
© 2025 Tianmeng Qu, Xinyu Chen, Xinyi Zheng, Yanru Zhang, Yizhen Shao, Hongze Sun, Bing Zhang, Gan Xie, Zhixi Fu.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Qu T, Chen X, Zheng X, Zhang Y, Shao Y, Sun H, Zhang B, Xie G, Fu Z (2025) Pollen morphology and species differentiation in selected species of Inuleae (Asteraceae). PhytoKeys 263: 215-240. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.263.165364
|
The tribe Inuleae is widely distributed within Asteraceae and exhibits considerable morphological variation, which complicates species classification. Pollen morphology provides relatively stable features for species delimitation, yet comprehensive palynological data for many species remain limited. In this study, the pollen morphology of 19 species from eight genera of Inuleae was investigated using light microscopy (LM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), with a focus on 10 quantitative traits. Multivariate analyses, including principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA), showed that both pollen size and exine ornamentation contribute to interspecific differentiation. Differences were especially notable between Blumea and Carpesium, with the latter showing larger pollen grains and more slender, scattered spines. This research also presents first-time palynological descriptions of Blumea, Carpesium, Inula, Laggera, Pentanema, and Pterocaulon. Overall, the findings indicate that pollen morphological traits are informative for species differentiation and lay a foundation for further palynological classification within Inuleae.
Blumea, Carpesium, HCA, palynology, PCA, SEM, taxonomy
Inuleae (Asteraceae: Asteroideae), sensu
Pollen morphology has long contributed to plant taxonomy, supporting species and genus identification across diverse plant groups (
Recent studies on the palynology of the tribe Inuleae have made notable progress. Inuleae pollen typically exhibits a caveate, echinate–microperforate exine (
Accordingly, this study focuses on 19 species of Inuleae to analyze pollen morphology and its systematic implications. Detailed pollen morphological data for 11 species are presented here for the first time. Species sampling targeted lineages within Inuleae considered informative for interpreting pollen characters, enabling lineage-aware interpretation among the sampled taxa. This study forms the second part of an ongoing investigation into palynological and evolutionary patterns in Asteraceae, following our work on Astereae (
Nineteen pollen samples were selected from voucher specimens deposited in the PE Herbarium at the Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Sampling followed a tribe-level phylogenetic framework to cover major lineages of Inuleae. The selected taxa include species from Blumea, Carpesium, and all studied genera of the tribe (Table
List of the voucher specimens in the PE Herbarium, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
| Species | Subtribe ( |
Locality | Collection Date | Collector | Specimen barcodes | Palynological record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blumea balsamifera (L.) DC. | Inulinae | Guizhou, China | 10 Apr. 1959 | Qiannan Team | PE 00569129 |
|
| Blumea megacephala (Randeria) C.T.Chang & C.H.Yu | Inulinae | Guangxi, China | 10 Dec. 2015 | Z. Y. Zhang et al. | PE 02112569 |
|
| Blumea lacera (Burm.f.) DC. | Inulinae | Guangxi, China | 15 Apr. 1998 | H. N. Qin et al. | PE 01997400 |
|
| Blumea fistulosa (Roxb.) Kurz | Inulinae | Guangdong, China | 5 Apr. 1997 | Shenzhen Expedition Team | PE 01401511 |
|
| Blumea lanceolaria (Roxb.) Druce | Inulinae | Guangxi, China | 7 Nov. 2010 | Y. S. Chen | PE 02110949 | First report |
| Blumea formosana Kitam. | Inulinae | Jiangxi, China | 7 Oct. 1980 | Southern Grassland Team | PE 01776724 | First report |
| Carpesium szechuanense F.H.Chen & C.M.Hu | Inulinae | Sichuan, China | 8 Aug. 2007 | Y. S. Chen | PE 01670507 | First report |
| Carpesium triste Maxim. | Inulinae | Tochigi, Japan | 28 Aug. 1988 | M. Furuse | PE 01292635 | First report |
| Carpesium cordatum F.H.Chen & C.M.Hu | Inulinae | Sichuan, China | 13 Jul. 2005 | D.E.Boufford et al. | PE 01882433 | First report |
| Carpesium cernuum L. | Inulinae | Henan, China | Aug. 2009 | Yuntai Mountain collection Team | PE 02015903 |
|
| Carpesium longifolium F.H.Chen & C.M.Hu | Inulinae | Sichuan, China | 5 Sep. 2010 | Gulin Expedition Team | PE 01864636 | First report |
| Inula japonica Thunb. | Inulinae | Shaanxi, China | 18 Jul. 1953 | K. J. Fu | PE 00571428 | First report |
| Karelinia caspia (Pall.) Less. | Plucheinae | Gansu, China | 12 Aug. 1964 | - | PE 01577784 |
|
| Laggera crispata (Vahl) Hepper & J.R.I.Wood | Plucheinae | Guizhou, China | 2 May 2003 | G. F. Wang | PE 01688665 | First report |
| Laggera alata (D. Don) Sch.Bip. ex Oliv. | Plucheinae | Guizhou, China | 7 Apr. 2004 | F. C. Wang | PE 01717274 |
|
| Pentanema indicum var. hypoleucum (Hand.-Mazz.) Y.Ling | Inulinae | Guizhou, China | 15 Mar. 1960 | Guizhou Team | PE 01711140 | First report |
| Pentanema cernuum (Dalzell) Y.Ling | Inulinae | Yunnan, China | - | A. Henry | PE 01711084 | First report |
| Pterocaulon redolens (Willd.) Fern.-Vill. | Plucheinae | Queensland, Australia | 1 Dec. 2012 | K. R. McDonald | PE 02110665 | First report |
| Pulicaria dysenterica (L.) Bernh. | Inulinae | Istria, Slovenia | 7 Sep. 2009 | V. Mikolas et al. | PE 02012570 |
|
Pollen samples were acetolysed using standard methods (
As shown in Fig.
Pollen morphological traits of 19 selected species (Ss: spine spacing; D: diameter of spine base; H: spine height; P: polar length in equatorial view; E: equatorial width in equatorial view; T: exine thickness in polar view; L: pollen length in polar view).
| Species | Ss (μm) | D (μm) | H (μm) | D/H | P (μm) | E (μm) | P/E | T (μm) | L (μm) | T/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blumea balsamifera (L.) DC. | 4.79±0.23 | 3.39±0.12 | 3.58±0.17 | 0.95±0.03 | 28.82±1.48 | 26.86±1.12 | 1.07±0.04 | 4.27±0.27 | 28.04±1.29 | 0.15±0.01 |
| Blumea megacephala (Randeria) C.T.Chang & C.H.Yu | 6.01±0.55 | 3.69±0.36 | 3.95±0.36 | 0.93±0.04 | 26.68±1.66 | 24.76±1.21 | 1.08±0.04 | 4.10±0.30 | 27.50±1.29 | 0.15±0.01 |
| Blumea lacera (Burm.f.) DC. | 4.80±0.43 | 3.00±0.17 | 3.98±0.23 | 0.75±0.04 | 25.70±1.48 | 25.54±0.97 | 1.01±0.05 | 4.09±0.26 | 27.07±1.57 | 0.15±0.01 |
| Blumea fistulosa (Roxb.) Kurz | 4.92±0.42 | 3.31±0.34 | 3.86±0.40 | 0.86±0.06 | 29.94±1.67 | 27.58±1.58 | 1.09±0.03 | 4.05±0.18 | 30.20±1.10 | 0.13±0.00 |
| Blumea lanceolaria (Roxb.) Druce | 5.41±0.39 | 3.13±0.27 | 3.61±0.24 | 0.87±0.04 | 27.72±0.67 | 25.73±0.64 | 1.08±0.02 | 3.96±0.23 | 28.23±1.60 | 0.14±0.01 |
| Blumea formosana Kitam. | 5.69±0.24 | 3.26±0.19 | 4.09±0.24 | 0.80±0.03 | 32.90±1.66 | 29.79±1.50 | 1.10±0.02 | 4.14±0.13 | 30.35±1.37 | 0.14±0.01 |
| Carpesium szechuanense F.H.Chen & C.M.Hu | 5.23±0.44 | 2.96±0.22 | 4.34±0.33 | 0.68±0.03 | 31.43±0.97 | 28.86±0.90 | 1.09±0.02 | 4.53±0.19 | 31.55±1.41 | 0.14±0.00 |
| Carpesium triste Maxim. | 5.08±0.27 | 2.96±0.31 | 3.74±0.38 | 0.79±0.04 | 31.60±0.83 | 29.12±0.70 | 1.09±0.02 | 4.06±0.21 | 30.16±1.55 | 0.13±0.00 |
| Carpesium cordatum F.H.Chen & C.M.Hu | 5.29±0.23 | 3.16±0.16 | 4.11±0.22 | 0.77±0.04 | 34.34±1.00 | 32.16±0.97 | 1.07±0.01 | 4.66±0.12 | 33.49±0.84 | 0.14±0.00 |
| Carpesium cernuum L. | 5.70±0.32 | 3.47±0.13 | 4.32±0.24 | 0.80±0.04 | 31.73±0.82 | 28.82±0.66 | 1.10±0.02 | 4.56±0.17 | 30.95±1.13 | 0.15±0.00 |
| Carpesium longifolium F.H.Chen & C.M.Hu | 6.34±0.51 | 3.75±0.35 | 5.17±0.55 | 0.73±0.04 | 35.06±1.41 | 32.42±1.70 | 1.08±0.03 | 5.12±0.18 | 32.98±1.20 | 0.16±0.01 |
| Inula japonica Thunb. | 5.06±0.33 | 2.90±0.24 | 3.51±0.27 | 0.83±0.03 | 27.51±0.74 | 26.23±0.91 | 1.05±0.02 | 3.86±0.13 | 27.06±1.04 | 0.14±0.00 |
| Karelinia caspia (Pall.) Less. | 5.62±0.23 | 3.28±0.13 | 3.79±0.17 | 0.87±0.03 | 31.28±0.81 | 27.69±0.90 | 1.13±0.02 | 4.33±0.21 | 29.65±1.19 | 0.15±0.00 |
| Laggera crispata (Vahl) Hepper & J.R.I.Wood | 5.76±0.17 | 3.27±0.19 | 3.83±0.14 | 0.85±0.03 | 27.19±1.20 | 25.51±1.15 | 1.07±0.02 | 3.94±0.21 | 27.97±0.82 | 0.14±0.01 |
| Laggera alata (D. Don) Sch.Bip. ex Oliv. | 4.65±0.26 | 2.75±0.16 | 3.22±0.13 | 0.85±0.03 | 27.19±1.42 | 24.51±1.33 | 1.11±0.03 | 3.75±0.22 | 26.62±0.93 | 0.14±0.01 |
| Pentanema indicum var. hypoleucum (Hand.-Mazz.) Y.Ling | 4.38±0.27 | 2.52±0.18 | 2.91±0.24 | 0.87±0.02 | 23.51±0.91 | 22.39±0.75 | 1.05±0.03 | 3.18±0.19 | 23.26±0.73 | 0.14±0.01 |
| Pentanema cernuum (Dalzell) Y.Ling | 4.51±0.18 | 2.60±0.10 | 2.96±0.14 | 0.88±0.03 | 22.64±0.92 | 21.36±0.82 | 1.06±0.03 | 3.20±0.14 | 23.05±1.06 | 0.14±0.01 |
| Pterocaulon redolens (Willd.) Fern.-Vill. | 4.42±0.21 | 2.42±0.10 | 2.69±0.11 | 0.90±0.02 | 22.77±1.56 | 22.00±1.52 | 1.04±0.02 | 3.06±0.12 | 22.67±1.31 | 0.14±0.01 |
| Pulicaria dysenterica (L.) Bernh. | 4.22±0.29 | 2.56±0.16 | 3.32±0.13 | 0.77±0.05 | 23.85±1.22 | 22.29±1.18 | 1.07±0.02 | 3.06±0.18 | 23.69±1.68 | 0.13±0.01 |
Boxplots of the 10 pollen traits were generated using OriginPro 2025. To eliminate dimensional effects and improve comparability, trait data were standardized using Z-scores (
Detailed pollen morphological data observed under LM and SEM are presented in Figs
LM micrographs of pollen grains in equatorial view. A. Blumea balsamifera; B. B. megacephala; C. B. lacera; D. B. fistulosa; E. B. lanceolaria; F. B. formosana; G. Carpesium szechuanense; H. C. triste; I. C. cordatum; J. C. cernuum; K. C. longifolium; L. Inula japonica; M. Karelinia caspia; N. Laggera crispata; O. L. alata; P. Pentanema indicum var. hypoleucum; Q. P. cernuum; R. Pterocaulon redolens; S. Pulicaria dysenterica. Scale bars represents 10 µm.
LM micrographs of pollen grains in polar view. A. Blumea balsamifera; B. B. megacephala; C. B. lacera; D. B. fistulosa; E. B. lanceolaria; F. B. formosana; G. Carpesium szechuanense; H. C. triste; I. C. cordatum; J. C. cernuum; K. C. longifolium; L. Inula japonica; M. Karelinia caspia; N. Laggera crispata; O. L. alata; P. Pentanema indicum var. hypoleucum; Q. P. cernuum; R. Pterocaulon redolens; S. Pulicaria dysenterica. The scale bar represents 10 µm.
SEM micrographs of pollen grains. For each species, four images are arranged in a row: 1. Equatorial view; 2. Equatorial detail; 3. Polar view; 4. Polar detail. A1–A4. Blumea balsamifera; B1–B4. B. megacephala; C1–C4. B. lacera; D1–D4. B. fistulosa; E1–E4. B. lanceolaria; F1–F4. B. formosana. The scale bars represent 10 µm in overviews and 1 µm in details.
SEM micrographs of pollen grains. For each species, four images are arranged in a row: 1. Equatorial view; 2. Equatorial detail; 3. Polar view; 4. Polar detail. A1–A4. Carpesium szechuanense; B1–B4. C. triste; C1–C4. C. cordatum; D1–D4. C. cernuum; E1–E4. C. longifolium; F1–F4. Inula japonica. The scale bars represent 10 µm in overviews and 1 µm in details.
SEM micrographs of pollen grains. For each species, four images are arranged in a row: 1. Equatorial view; 2. Equatorial detail; 3. Polar view; 4. Polar detail. A1–A4. Karelinia caspia; B1–B4. Laggera crispata; C1–C4. L. alata; D1–D4. Pentanema indicum var. hypoleucum; E1–E4. P. cernuum; F1–F4. Pterocaulon redolens; G1–G4. Pulicaria dysenterica. The scale bars represent 10 µm in overviews and 1 µm in details.
Boxplots of 19 sampled taxa showing the variations in pollen morphological traits (P. polar length in equatorial view; E. equatorial width in equatorial view; T. exine thickness in polar view; L. pollen length in polar view; D. diameter of spine base; H. spine height; Ss. spine spacing). 1. Blumea balsamifera. 2. B. megacephala. 3. B. lacera. 4. B. fistulosa. 5. B. lanceolaria. 6. B. formosana. 7. Carpesium szechuanense. 8. C. triste. 9. C. cordatum. 10. C. cernuum. 11. C. longifolium. 12. Inula japonica. 13. Karelinia caspia. 14. Laggera crispata. 15. L. alata. 16. Pentanema indicum var. hypoleucum. 17. P. cernuum. 18. Pterocaulon redolens. 19. Pulicaria dysenterica.
Pollen grains were generally spherical, with all species exhibiting tricolporate apertures visible under both LM and SEM. The P/E ratio (polar axis length / equatorial axis length) ranged from 1.01 to 1.13. In equatorial view, P ranged from 22.64 to 35.06 µm, and E from 21.36 to 32.42 µm. The T/L ratio (exine thickness / pollen length) ranged from 0.13 to 0.16. In polar view, T ranged from 3.06 to 5.12 µm, and L from 22.67 to 33.49 µm. Interspecific differences were observed in P, E, P/E, T, L, and T/L (p < 0.01).
Detailed measurements of pollen traits show variation across species within each genus.
In Blumea, the pollen grains have a polar length (P) ranging from 25.70 to 32.90 μm and an equatorial width (E) ranging from 24.76 to 29.79 μm, giving a P/E ratio between 1.01 and 1.10, the lowest observed in this study. The exine thickness (T) ranges from 3.96 to 4.27 μm, and the pollen length (L) ranges from 27.07 to 30.35 μm, with a T/L ratio between 0.13 and 0.15. These traits suggest that Blumea species have relatively large pollen grains compared to other genera.
In Carpesium, the pollen grains have a P ranging from 31.43 to 35.06 μm and an E from 28.82 to 32.42 μm, giving a P/E ratio between 1.07 and 1.10. The T ranges from 4.06 to 5.12 μm, and the L ranges from 30.16 to 33.49 μm, with a T/L ratio between 0.13 and 0.16. These traits suggest that Carpesium has relatively large pollen grains, with the largest P, E, T, and L values observed, surpassing most other genera measured in this study.
In Inula, the pollen grains have a P of 27.51 μm and an E of 26.23 μm, giving a P/E ratio of 1.05. The T is 3.86 μm, and the L is 27.06 μm, with a T/L ratio of 0.14. These traits suggest that Inula has moderately sized pollen grains in relation to the species measured.
In Karelinia, the pollen grains have a P of 31.28 μm and an E of 27.69 μm, giving a P/E ratio of 1.13. The T is 4.33 μm, and the L is 29.65 μm, with a T/L ratio of 0.15. These traits suggest that Karelinia has relatively large pollen grains, with the largest P/E ratio observed in this study.
In Laggera, the pollen grains have a P of 27.19 μm and an E ranging from 24.51 to 25.51 μm, giving a P/E ratio between 1.07 and 1.11. The T ranges from 3.75 to 3.94 μm, and the L ranges from 26.62 to 27.97 μm, with a T/L ratio of 0.14. These traits suggest that Laggera has moderate-sized pollen grains, characteristic of the species measured.
In Pentanema, the pollen grains have a P ranging from 22.64 to 23.51 μm and an E from 21.36 to 22.39 μm, giving a P/E ratio between 1.05 and 1.06. The T ranges from 3.18 to 3.20 μm, and the L ranges from 23.05 to 23.26 μm, with a T/L ratio of 0.14. These traits suggest that Pentanema has relatively small pollen grains, with the smallest P and E values measured in this study.
In Pterocaulon, the pollen grains have a P of 22.77 μm and an E of 22.00 μm, giving a P/E ratio of 1.04. The T is 3.06 μm, and the L is 22.67 μm, with a T/L ratio of 0.14. These traits suggest that Pterocaulon has relatively small pollen grains, with the smallest T and L values measured in this study.
In Pulicaria, the pollen grains have a P of 23.85 μm and an E of 22.29 μm, giving a P/E ratio of 1.07. The T is 3.06 μm, and the L is 23.69 μm, with a T/L ratio of 0.13. These traits suggest that Pulicaria has relatively small pollen grains relative to other genera measured.
SEM observations revealed echinate exine surfaces, with spines tapering to sharp apices and typically surrounded by one or more rows of perforations at the base (Suppl. material
Detailed measurements of pollen traits show variation across species within each genus.
In Blumea, the exine spines have a diameter (D) ranging from 3.00 to 3.69 μm and a height (H) between 3.58 and 4.09 μm. The D/H ratio ranges from 0.75 to 0.95, with the highest value of 0.95, indicating a relatively high height-to-diameter ratio compared to other genera. The spine spacing (Ss) ranges from 4.79 to 6.01 μm, showing a moderately wide distribution. These traits suggest that Blumea species have spines with a relatively high height-to-diameter ratio and moderate spacing.
In Carpesium, the exine spines have a D ranging from 2.96 to 3.75 μm and an H from 3.74 to 5.17 μm. The D/H ratio ranges from 0.68 to 0.80, with the lowest value observed among the 19 species, indicating relatively slender spines. The Ss ranges from 5.08 to 6.34 μm, with the highest value observed in this study. These traits suggest that Carpesium has more slender spines with a wider spacing.
In Inula, the exine spines have a D of 2.90 μm and an H of 3.51 μm. The D/H ratio is 0.83, indicating a moderate ratio between height and diameter. The Ss is 5.06 μm. These traits suggest that Inula has relatively small spines with moderate spacing.
In Karelinia, the exine spines have a D of 3.28 μm and an H of 3.79 μm, resulting in a D/H ratio of 0.87. The Ss is 5.62 μm, one of the larger values observed. These traits suggest that Karelinia has moderately long spines with relatively wide spacing compared to other species.
In Laggera, the exine spines have a D ranging from 2.75 to 3.27 μm and an H from 3.22 to 3.83 μm, resulting in a D/H ratio of 0.85. The Ss ranges from 4.65 to 5.76 μm. These traits suggest that Laggera has moderately long spines with evenly spaced distribution.
In Pentanema, the exine spines have a D from 2.52 to 2.60 μm and an H from 2.91 to 2.96 μm, resulting in a D/H ratio from 0.87 to 0.88, indicating short spines. The Ss ranges from 4.38 to 4.51 μm, with relatively narrow spacing. These traits suggest that Pentanema has small, compact spines with dense distribution.
In Pterocaulon, the exine spines have a D of 2.42 μm and an H of 2.69 μm, resulting in a D/H ratio of 0.90. The Ss is 4.42 μm. The spines in this genus are relatively small and tightly spaced, which contributes to a compact and dense ornamentation pattern on the pollen surface.
In Pulicaria, the exine spines have a D of 2.56 μm and an H of 3.32 μm, resulting in a D/H ratio of 0.77. The Ss is 4.22 μm, with tight spacing. These traits suggest that Pulicaria has moderately long spines with a dense distribution.
PCA revealed that the first two principal components accounted for 81.06% of total morphological variation (Table
Palynological characters used in the multivariate analysis of the Inuleae (P: polar length in equatorial view; E: equatorial width in equatorial view; T: exine thickness in polar view; L: pollen length in polar view; D: diameter of spine base; H: spine height; Ss: spine spacing). The contribution of every character for Axis 1 and Axis 2 is indicated.
| Character | Axis 1 | Axis 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | P (μm) | 0.939 | -0.232 |
| 2 | E (μm) | 0.936 | -0.244 |
| 3 | P/E | 0.482 | -0.049 |
| 4 | T (μm) | 0.979 | 0.053 |
| 5 | L (μm) | 0.957 | -0.192 |
| 6 | T/L | 0.560 | 0.611 |
| 7 | D (μm) | 0.854 | 0.451 |
| 8 | H (μm) | 0.950 | -0.050 |
| 9 | D/H | -0.452 | 0.737 |
| 10 | Ss (μm) | 0.851 | 0.299 |
Correlation matrix of palynological characters in the Inuleae (P: polar length in equatorial view; E: equatorial width in equatorial view; T: exine thickness in polar view; L: pollen length in polar view; D: diameter of spine base; H: spine height; Ss: spine spacing). p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**).
| P (μm) | E (μm) | P/E | T (μm) | L (μm) | T/L | D (μm) | H (μm) | D/H | Ss (μm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P (μm) | 1 | 0.985** | 0.559* | 0.906** | 0.971** | 0.273 | 0.693** | 0.835** | -0.469* | 0.702** |
| E (μm) | 0.985** | 1 | 0.408 | 0.919** | 0.972** | 0.294 | 0.683** | 0.857** | -0.517* | 0.683** |
| P/E | 0.559* | 0.408 | 1 | 0.386 | 0.485* | -0.008 | 0.394 | 0.304 | 0.003 | 0.432 |
| T (μm) | 0.906** | 0.919** | 0.386 | 1 | 0.943** | 0.557* | 0.832** | 0.921** | -0.417 | 0.787** |
| L (μm) | 0.971** | 0.972** | 0.485* | 0.943** | 1 | 0.272 | 0.740** | 0.878** | -0.491* | 0.725** |
| T/L | 0.273 | 0.294 | -0.008 | 0.557* | 0.272 | 1 | 0.589** | 0.498* | 0.024 | 0.565* |
| D (μm) | 0.693** | 0.683** | 0.394 | 0.832** | 0.740** | 0.589** | 1 | 0.814** | -0.018 | 0.875** |
| H (μm) | 0.835** | 0.857** | 0.304 | 0.921** | 0.878** | 0.498* | 0.814** | 1 | -0.588** | 0.811** |
| D/H | -0.469* | -0.517* | 0.003 | -0.417 | -0.491* | 0.024 | -0.018 | -0.588** | 1 | -0.176 |
| Ss (μm) | 0.702** | 0.683** | 0.432 | 0.787** | 0.725** | 0.565* | 0.875** | 0.811** | -0.176 | 1 |
As shown in Fig.
Principal Components Analysis graph showing the contribution of the ten attributes to explain variation in pollen grains of the studied Inuleae species; P. Polar length in equatorial view; E. Equatorial width in equatorial view, P/E, T. Exine thickness in polar view, L. Pollen length in polar view, T/L, D. Diameter of spine base, H. Spine height, D/H, Ss. Spine spacing.
The palynological groups of the species were evaluated using hierarchical cluster analysis based on their morphological traits. The analysis separated the 19 Inuleae species into two major groups, Group A and Group B, with Group A further dividing into subgroups A1 and A2 (Fig.
This study documented substantial inter-individual variation in pollen morphology across 19 Inuleae species, particularly in grain size and exine ornamentation. All species exhibited spherical pollen grains with tricolporate apertures, and the exine surfaces were echinate. Variations in spine morphology provided measurable differences between species, consistent with previous studies on Asteraceae (
A comparative review was conducted to evaluate the consistency of morphological traits across genera. Among the Blumea species—B. balsamifera, B. megacephala, B. lacera, and B. fistulosa—we observed tricolporate pollen with echinate ornamentation, consistent with the descriptions in
The genera Blumea DC. and Carpesium L. are major members of the subtribe Inulinae within Inuleae. Blumea is the largest genus in the tribe (
PCA highlighted pollen size and exine ornamentation as key contributors to morphological differentiation among species (
According to
Quantitative pollen morphological data from 19 Inuleae species provide valuable insights into the systematic palynology of Asteraceae. In this study, one specimen per species was analyzed, a common practice in palynological research (
This study documented variation in pollen morphology among 19 Inuleae species, focusing on grain size, shape, and exine ornamentation. These traits proved useful in distinguishing species and contributed to taxonomic classification. While HCA and PCA refined species clustering based on pollen traits, the taxonomic relationships among species cannot be fully clarified by pollen morphology alone. These results provide a foundation for future research on the role of pollen morphology in species differentiation within Inuleae.
The authors thank Dr. Xiuping Xu (Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences) for expert guidance in SEM and the anonymous reviewers for their invaluable comments, which greatly improved the quality of this manuscript.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
No ethical statement was reported.
No use of AI was reported.
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 32000158, 42077423), the National Science & Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program of China (No. 2021XJKK0702), the Foundation of Sustainable Development Research Center of Resources and Environment of Western Sichuan, Sichuan Normal University (No. 2020CXZYHJZX03), the Key Laboratory of Chemistry in Ethnic Medicinal Resources (Yunnan Minzu University), the State Ethnic Affairs Commission & Ministry of Education (No. MZY2301), and the Key Research and Development Program of Leshan Science and Technology Plan (No. 24ZDYF0099).
TQ: conceptualization, writing—original draft; XC: software, formal analysis; XZ: formal analysis, data curation; YZ: formal analysis; YS: data curation; HS: data curation; BZ: data curation; GX: resources, writing—review and editing; ZF: conceptualization, writing—review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Tianmeng Qu https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0185-5306
Xinyu Chen https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6347-2490
Xinyi Zheng https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2300-5525
Yanru Zhang https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0450-2001
Yizhen Shao https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8865-3959
Hongze Sun https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5831-9979
Bing Zhang https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6019-0629
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.
Pollen morphological descriptions of 19 species from 8 genera of Inuleae
Data type: docx