Research Article |
Corresponding author: Xun-Lin Yu ( csfuyuxl@163.com ) Corresponding author: Lei Wu ( wuleiibk@163.com ) Academic editor: Karol Marhold
© 2025 Ang Liu, Xiong Li, Guo-xing Deng, Jun Chen, Zan Liu, Xun-Lin Yu, Lei Wu.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Liu A, Li X, Deng G-xing, Chen J, Liu Z, Yu X-L, Wu L (2025) Cardamine mangshanensis, a new species of Brassicaceae from limestone landform in Southern Hunan, China. PhytoKeys 256: 131-139. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.256.153110
|
Cardamine mangshanensis, a new species, is described and illustrated from the limestone landform in southern Hunan, China. The new species is similar to C. macrophylla, but differs from the latter in having more prominent tubers, shorter plant height (10–25 cm vs. 30–95 cm), fewer cauline leaves (3–4 vs. 3–18), crenate leaf margin (vs. serrate), fewer flowers (4–10 vs. 10–30), an earlier flowering period (late February to mid-March vs. April to June) and a shorter growth cycle (ca. 4 months vs. ca. 8 months). Following the IUCN Red List Criteria, C. mangshanensis is assessed as ‘Vulnerable, VU B2ab(ii)’.
Cardamine, limestone landform, new species, taxonomy
The genus Cardamine L. comprises approximately 300 species (https://cardamine.sav.sk), distributed on all continents except Antarctica. According to the Flora of China (
On 25 March 2020, during an investigation in Mangshan National Nature Reserve, we discovered a unique species of the genus Cardamine. This plant had already passed its peak flowering period, with ovaries developing into nascent fruits, indicating that it was different from the plants of the same genus recorded in Hunan Province (
The specimens are primarily deposited in the Herbarium of Forest Plants at Central South University of Forestry and Technology (CSFI). Morphological observations of the new species were derived from field observations and examination of herbarium specimens. Comparative analyses of related species were examined using online images from JSTOR Global Plants (https://plants.jstor.org/). The conservation status of the new species is based on field observations in accordance with IUCN Red List guidelines (
This new species is similar to C. macrophylla Willd., but it differs in the following characteristics: more prominent tubers, shorter plant height (10–25 cm vs. 20–115 cm), fewer cauline leaves (3–4 vs. 3–18), distinctly petiolulate leaflets (vs. sessile or occasionally with a short petiole), crenate leaf margin (vs. serrate), fewer flowers (4–10 vs. 10–30), white flowers (vs. purple or lilac, rarely white), an earlier flowering period (late February to mid-March vs. April to June) and shorter growth cycle in one year (ca. 3 months vs. ca. 8 months) (See Fig.
Comparison of morphological characters between Cardamine mangshanensis sp. nov. and C. macrophylla.
Characters | Cardamine mangshanensis sp. nov. | C. macrophylla |
---|---|---|
Plant | 10–25 cm high | (20-) 30–95 (-115) cm high |
Rhizome | with obvious tubers | with tuberous knots |
Cauline leaves | 3–4 | 3–18 |
terminal leaflet | petiole 0.5–1.5 cm long | sessile |
lateral leaflets | 2–4 pairs | 2–7(-11) pairs |
petiole 0.5–2.5 cm long | sessile or occasionally with short petiole (no more than 1 cm) | |
margin crenate | margin serrate | |
base obliquely cordate | base cuneate or obliquely decurrent |
|
Racemes | 4–10 flowers | 10–40 flowers |
Flower color | white | purple or lilac, rarely white |
Flowering period | late February to mid-March | April to June |
Growth cycle in one year | ca. 3 months | ca. 8 months |
China. Hunan: Chenzhou City, Yizhang County, Mt. Mangshan, Hejiawan, in sparse forests within limestone areas, elevation ca. 650 m, 27 February 2021, Ang Liu & You-ke Gong HJW01 (Holotype CSFI!, isotype CSFI!, HIB!&CSH!) (See Fig.
Herbs perennial, delicate, 10–25 cm high. Rhizomes creeping, with tubers, 0.3–5 cm long. Stems erect, unbranched, surface furrowed, smooth. Cauline leaves 3–4, petiole 1.5–5 cm long, smooth, not auriculate at base, margin glandular serrate; terminal leaflets elliptic or oblong, (1.5-) 2.5–4 (-5.5) × (0.5-) 1–2.5 (-3) cm, sparsely pilose, petiole 0.5–1.5 cm long, base cuneate, margin crenate, rarely doubly serrate, apex acute, slightly caudate; lateral leaflets 2–4 pairs, sparsely pilose, petiole 0.5–2.5 cm long, base obliquely cordate or truncate, margin crenate, equal to or slightly smaller than terminal leaflets. Racemes 4–10 flowered, dense, inflorescence slightly elongated in fruit, pedicel 0.5–1.5 cm long. Sepals elliptic, ca. 0.5 cm long, green, glabrous or very sparsely pilose. Petals white, obovate, 1 cm long, blunt at the top and cuneate at the base. Stamens glabrous, ca. 6 mm long, filaments about 4 mm long, base slightly dilated, anthers purplish red. Pistils 5–7 mm long, ovary columnar, style slender, ca. 3 mm long, equal to or slightly longer than the ovary. Mature fruit not observed.
Flowering occurs from late February to mid-March. Interestingly, after completing seed propagation (before mid-April), the aboveground parts of the plant wither.
The specific epithet of this new species is derived from its type locality, Mt. Mangshan, one of the most famous mountains in southern Hunan.
This new species is currently known only from the limestone landform area of Mt. Mangshan, where it typically grows beneath sparse bamboo forests.
(Paratypes). China. Hunan: Chenzhou City, Yizhang County, Mt. Mangshan, Hejiawan, in sparse forests within limestone areas, elevation ca. 650 m, 25 March 2020, Ang Liu & Xiong Li LAHJW01 (CSFI!, HIB! & CSH!).
Currently, only one population with a total of about 300 individuals has been found in the limestone areas of Mt. Mangshan. This population is located within the boundaries of Mangshan National Nature Reserve and is minimally affected by human activities. Based on the IUCN Red List criteria (
The Flora of China notes that C. macrophylla exhibits a considerable degree of variability, particularly in terms of leaflet number, shape, size, basal structure, and margin characteristics. Special attention is given to the specimen cataloged as Henry 5635, which serves as a key reference in this context. Similar phenomena have been observed in our field studies. However, regardless of the variation in the length of the petioles of the lateral leaflets, the terminal leaflet and the pair of lateral leaflets directly beneath it consistently lack petioles (See Fig.
Leaf morphological variation of Cardamine macrophylla (A–C) and C. mangshanensis sp. nov. (D) A Henry 5635(GH00112001) B Henry 5635(US00100058) C Henry 5635 (K000697746) A–C from JSTOR (https://plants.jstor.org/) D from type locality of C. mangshanensis, photograph by Ang Liu.
However, the terminal leaflet of C. mangshanensis is clearly petiolulate, measuring 0.5–1.5 cm in length. Additionally, the pair of lateral leaflets on its lower side are clearly not closely attached and has petioles that are 0.5–2.5 cm long (See Figs
Based on our observations, we have identified a significant correlation between the leaf size of this species and annual precipitation levels. In years with abundant rainfall, such as 2020, the leaves exhibit a marked increase in size, measuring approximately 3–5.5 cm in length and 1.5–2.5 cm in width. In contrast, during years with limited rainfall, such as 2021, the leaves are significantly smaller, ranging from 1.5–2.5 cm in length and 0.5–1 cm in width. This adaptive response to environmental fluctuations highlights the species’ enhanced reproductive capacity and ecological resilience.
These findings provide deeper insights into the complex relationship between morphological traits and environmental factors in C. mangshanensis, and underline its remarkable ability to thrive under varying climatic conditions in limestone landform.
Thanks for PhD Jing Tian’s exquisite preparation of the line drawing and PhD Hong-liang Chen’s great help with this article.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
No ethical statement was reported.
No funding was reported.
All authors have contributed equally.
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.