Citation: Barkworth ME, Cialdella AM, Gandhi K (2014) Piptochaetium fuscum (Nees ex Steud.) Barkworth, Ciald., & Gandhi, a new combination replacing Piptochaetium setosum (Trin.) Arechav. PhytoKeys 35: 17–22. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.35.6622
A new name, Piptochaetium fuscum, is provided for a taxon hitherto known as Piptochaetium setosum (Trin.) Arechav. Morphological, anatomical, and molecular studies that argue against including Piptochaetium in Stipa, and hence use of S. purpurata (Phil.) Columbus & J.P. Sm., are cited.
Stipeae, Stipa, Piptochaetium, nomenclature
In February 2010, Gandhi, in responding to an inquiry from Dr. Travis Columbus, noticed that the name Piptochaetium setosum (Trin.) Arechav. was superfluous and illegitimate at the time of publication because its basionym, Urachne setosa Trin., was itself superfluous and illegitimate at the time of publication, Trinius having included in it two older and validly published names, Stipa panicoides Lam. and Oryzopsis setacea Rich. Stipa panicoides is the basionym of Piptochaetium panicoides (Lam.) Desv., a taxon that is now considered distinct from Piptochaetium setosum (
Columbus and Smith have published a new name for the taxon, but they placed it in Stipa L. as Stipa purpurata (Phil.) Columbus & J.P. Sm. (
We have examined images from each of the CGE and K specimens cited above. We agree with Parodi that they belong to Piptochaetium setosum as recognized by
Urachne fusca Nees ex Steud., Syn. Pl. Glumac. 1(2): 123. 1854 [1855 publ. 2–3 Mar 1854]. Lectotypus: K000433539, Herbarium Hookerianum 1867 (http://specimens.kew.org/herbarium/K000433539), imaginem videmus; Isolectotypi K000433540, Herbarium Benthianum 1854 (http://specimens.kew.org/herbarium/K000433540), imaginem videmus; CGE, Herb. J. Lindley, purchased 1866 (figs 1, 2, 3); “prope Valparaiso, Chili; H. Cuming 453, 1831; Imagines videmus.
Isotype of Piptochaetium fuscum deposited at CGE, the Cambridge University Herbarium, England. Image used with permission.
The three specimens are from the same gathering and conform to the protologue. We chose K000433539 as the lectotype because it has more material, both reproductive and vegetative, than the other specimens.
Native distribution of Piptochaetium fuscum. Information and base map from
To determine the conservation status of Piptochaetium fuscum, a search should be made for specimens in Chilean herbaria and field work conducted to locate natural populations. Such activities were beyond the scope of our study.
We thank Christine Bartram and Maria Vorontsova, at CGE and K, respectively, for their rapid response to our request for images of the Cuming 453 specimens at their institutions and Victoria Hollowell of Missouri Botanical Garden Press for giving permission to use the map on p. xix of