Short Communication
Print
Short Communication
Ferula groessingii (Apiaceae), a new synonym of Ferula licentiana var. tunshanica
expand article infoLei Yang§|, Wen-Jun Li§|
‡ Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi, China
§ Xinjiang Key Lab of Conservation and Utilization of Plant Gene Resources, Urumqi, China
| University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Open Access

Abstract

A comprehensive evaluation of the diagnostic characters employed in distinguishing Ferula groessingii from F. licentiana var. tunshanica has led to the conclusion that the two taxa are indeed conspecific. As a result, F. groessingii is hereby recognized as a new synonym of F. licentiana var. tunshanica. This reclassification is supported by a comprehensive comparison of taxonomic features, morphological evidence, and distribution data. The study confirms that key morphological traits including plant height, a hairy coat of stems and leaves, number of inflorescences, and fruit vittae, are critical for the identification of this species complex.

Key words:

Apiaceae, China, Ferula, new synonym, taxonomy

Introduction

Ferula L. is one of the largest genera in the Apiaceae family, encompassing approximately 220 species globally (https://powo.science.kew.org/results?q=ferula). It is mainly distributed in the southern part of Europe, Northern Africa, Central Asia, and the Mediterranean region, with Central Asia being the biodiversity hotspot of this genus (Pimenov and Leonov 1993).

Ferula groessingii Riedl & Riedl-Dorn was originally described as a new species endemic to China based on a single fruiting collection made by Licent from Taiqinggong in Qingdao, Shangong Province (Fig. 1). In the protologue, Riedl and Riedl-Dorn (1987) compared F. groessingii with F. bungeana Kitagawa (1956) and F. rigidula Candolle (1830), but they overlooked F. licentiana Handel-Mazzetti (1933) and F. tunshanica Anon. (Jiangsu Institute of Botany 1982), which are distributed in Shanxi, Shaanxi, Henan, Hebei, Hubei, Shandong, Anhui and Jiangsu provinces of China (Fig. 3). Furthermore, since its publication, the name has not received attention and was not included in the Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae (Shen 1992) or in the Flora of China (She and Watson 2005). The name F. groessingii reappeared only in Pimenov’s checklist of the Apiaceae in China (Pimenov 2017). However, for the 30 years following its publication, no other literature mentioned this species name.

Figure 1. 

The holotype specimen of F. groessingii (https://www.jacq.org/detail.php?ID=191435).

During our studies and exploration of the specimens of Ferula in China, we found that F. groessingii is morphologically very similar to F. licentiana var. tunshanica. The objective of this study is to confirm the relationship between F. groessingii and F. licentiana var. tunshanica.

Material and methods

We collected specimens of Ferula groessingii from the type locality in 2023 to 2024. These specimens were deposited at the Herbarium of Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences (XJBI). For the detailed collection information, including coordinates, please refer to the “Specimens examined” section. We carefully checked and studied the specimens from NAS and PE in person, while materials from KUN and WUK were examined through photographs on the Chinese Virtual Herbarium (CVH) website (https://www.cvh.ac.cn/index.php). We also conducted detailed comparisons of F. licentiana var. tunshanica plant images available on the Plant Photo Bank of China (PPBC) website (https://ppbc.iplant.cn/sp/24536). Photographs were taken in the field using a Nikon Z7 II camera. Hairs in the stems and leaves were examined using a dissecting microscope Phenix XTL-165 in the laboratory. In order to prepare tissue sections, the mature fruits were softened before being embedded in paraffin. Following staining, the sections were mounted with neutral balsam, observed under a microscope, and photographed for analysis. Additionally, we compared the protologue of F. groessingii with our observed results.

Results

We found a clear resemblance between F. groessingii and F. licentiana var. tunshanica (Figs 1, 2, Table 1). Field sampling conducted at the type locality of F. groessingii and its detailed comparisons with F. licentiana var. tunshanica revealed that its characters are nearly identical. Key diagnostic morphological features such as the plant being glabrous throughout, with an average height of about 2 m, a solitary and slender stem, as well as the morphology of the inflorescence and fruit vittae were found to be consistent between two taxa (She and Watson 2005). The distribution of F. groessingii matches completely with that of F. licentiana var. tunshanica. The latter is predominantly found on sunny mountain slopes in Shandong, Anhui and Jiangsu provinces (Fig. 3). Consequently, based on these findings, we propose F. groessingii be treated as a synonym of F. licentiana var. tunshanica.

Table 1.

Morphological comparisons of F. licentiana, F. licentiana var. tunshanica and F. groessingii.

Characters F. licentiana var. licentiana F. licentiana var. tunshanica F. groessingii
Habit 1.2–1.8 m Smaller 1.5–1.7 m
Stem stem solitary, slender, usually flexuose, paniculate-branched, lower branches alternate, upper branches verticillate stem glabrous, with a diameter of only 10 mm near the base, branched from the upper part
Leaves both surfaces glabrous, upper leaves reduced, bladeless, sheaths lanceolate, embracing both surfaces of the leaves are smooth and glabrous
Inflorescences terminal umbel short-pedunculate, lateral umbels 1–3, simple or opposite, exceeding terminal, rays 7–11, umbellules 7–11flowered. rays fewer, 3–7 short peduncle, with 5–7 rays; lateral umbels are often opposite, with long peduncles that exceed the central umbel, and have 7–9 rays.
Fruit oblong or oblong-obovate, 10–15 mm; lateral broadly winged fruits are also smaller, less than 10 mm elliptical or oblong, measuring 4.5 × 8 millimeters to 5.5 × 9 millimeters, with a thickness of 0.5–0.7 millimeters. The top of the fruit is slightly notched, with a filiform dorsal rib, and the vittae in each furrow are very broad.
Vittae 3–4 per furrow, 4–8 toward commissure 1–3 per furrow, 4–6 toward commissure commissural vittae are 4–6
Figure 2. 

Morphology of F. groessingii A habitat B basal leaves C inflorescence D individual E flowering stage F cauline leaves G mericarps, dorsal and commissural aspects H cross section of mericarp: (a) median rib, (b) lateral rib, (c) marginal rib, (d) endosperm, (e) vallecular vitta, (f) commissure vitta. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Figure 3. 

Distribution of F. licentiana, F. licentiana var. tunshanica and F. groessingii. The map is based on a standard map downloaded from the National Natural Resources Ministry’s Standard Map Service website. The boundaries of the base map have not been modified.

Discussion

The scientific name F. licentiana var. tunshanica has an intriguing taxonomic backstory. It was initially published as F. tunshanica Su in the Flora of Jiangsu (Vol. 2: 935. 1982), where “Su” was explicitly stated to represent a collective author (Jiangsu Institute of Botany). Subsequent treatments, whether the invalid reduction to a variety by Liu et al. (1987) or the inadvertent valid publication (Shen 1992; Yu et al. 2010), correctly cited the name authorship. However, in the Flora of China (She and Watson 2005), “Su” was mistakenly interpreted as referring to Song-Wang Su (S.W. Su) who confirmed not to be the author of this taxon, a misinterpretation that has persisted to this day. With no traceable natural person attributable to the name and in accordance with ICN 2018 Art. 46.9 Ex. 45, the correct citation for F. tunshanica should be Ferula tunshanica Anon. (in Fl. Jiangsu 2: 935. 1982).

Taxonomic treatment

Ferula licentiana var. tunshanica (Anon.) R.H.Shan & Q.X.Liu ex K.M.Shen, Fl. Reipubl. Popularis Sin. 55(3): 114 (1992).

Ferula tunshanica Anon. in Fl. Jiangsu 2: 935 (1982).

= Ferula groessingii Riedl & Riedl-Dorn, Linzer Biol. Beitr. 19(2): 485 (1987), syn. nov. Type. CHINA. Shandong province: Qingdao city, Taiqinggong, 12 August 1936, Licent E 13413 (holotype W, image!)

Type.

China. • Jiangsu province: Tongshan, Maocun, 22 June 1974, Wen-Zhe Fang & Ping-Ping Ling et al. 74020 (holotype: NAS00042894!).

Specimens examined.

China.Shandong: city. Qingdao, county Laoshan (36°08.17'N, 120°40.85'E), 18 Jun 2023, Wen-jun Li & Lei Yang LS20230618001 (XJBI, barcode XJBI00162552!; XJBI00162553!; XJBI00162554!; XJBI00162555!; XJBI00162556!; XJBI00162557!); city. Jinan, Hushan Forest Park, 11 Jun 2015, Xiao-wei Xin Lilan794 (KUN, image! barcode KUN1480754); city. Jinan, Foyu Valley, 8 Jun 1977, Chang-qi Yuan 83 (NAS, barcode NAS00021792!; NAS00021793!; NAS00021795!; NAS00021796!; NAS00021801!); city. Jinan, 12 Jun 1964, s.n. 64036 (NAS, barcode NAS00021719!; NAS00021720!). • Henan: city. Lingbao, Jiaoyuan Valley, 27 Jun 1974, Zhi-xin Hu 17213 (WUK, image! barcode WUK0416132; WUK0416133; WUK0297545). • Hubei: city. Zaoyang, county Shangdang, mountain Yazishan, 13 Jun 2018, Shen-lan Li GanQL1240 (KUN, image! barcode KUN1457994). • Jiangsu: mountain Tongshan, 10 Jul 1976, Ren-hua Shan 7607E (NAS, barcode NAS00021800!). • Shannxi: mountain Huashan, Yuquanyuan, 26 May 1956, Kun-jun Fu & Ben-zhao Guo 10101 (WUK, image! barcode WUK0092684); county Huayin, mountain Huashan, 24 Jun 1974, Kun-jun Fu 17207 (WUK, image! barcode WUK0416139; WUK0416140; WUK0297551); mountain Huashan, Suoluopin, 10 May 1961, Zhiwuxi 104 (WUK, image! barcode WUK0483271); mountain Huashan, Yukou, 1 Jun 1956, Kun-jun Fu & Ben-zhao Guo 10148 (WUK, image! barcode WUK0099592); county Huayin, Xianyu, 23 Jun 1974, Kun-jun Fu 17205 (WUK, image! barcode WUK0416128; WUK0416129; WUK0297553); county Huayin, Huayingongshe, 28 Jun 1974, Kun-jun Fu 17215 (WUK image!, barcode WUK0416130; WUK0416131). • Shanxi: county Huairen, 24 May 1938, W.Y.Hsia 4373 (PE, barcode PE00756177!).

Acknowledgments

Our sincere thanks to the staff of NAS, W, XJBI, KUN, WUK, PE, CVH and PPBC for their help in specimen examination and Dr. Hafiz Muhammad Wariss for modifying the English in this article.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the Western Young Scholars Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2022-XBQNXZ-003), the Tianshan Youth Program of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (2022TSYCCX0088), the Capacity building project of strategic biological resources program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (KFJ-BRP-017-089).

Author contributions

Conceptualization: WJL. Data curation: LY, WJL. Writing – original draft: LY. Writing – review and editing: WJL

Author ORCIDs

Lei Yang https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8888-5893

Wen-Jun Li https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2932-0783

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  • Candolle AP (1830) Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, sive, Enumeratio contracta ordinum generum specierumque plantarum huc usque cognitarium, juxta methodi naturalis, normas digesta, vol. 4. Treuttel et Würtz, Paris, 683 pp.
  • Jiangsu Institute of Botany (1982) Flora of Jiangsu, vol. 2. Phoenix Science Press, Nanjing.
  • Liu QX, Shan RH, Sheh ML (1987) Study on the species of genus Ferula L. in north and east China. In: Nanjing Botanical Garden, Mem. Sun Yat Sen (Ed.) Bulletin of the Nanjing Botanical Garden, Mem. Sun Yat Sen. Phoenix Science Press, Nanjing, 27–38.
  • Pimenov MG, Leonov MV (1993) The genera of the Umbelliferae: a nomenclator. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK, 156 pp.
  • Riedl H, Riedl-Dorn C (1987) Der Verwandtschaftskreis von Ferula rigidula De Candolle in China. Linz Biological Contributions 19: 483–494.
  • She ML, Watson MF (2005) Ferula. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, Hong DY (Eds) Flora of China, vol. 14. Science Press, Beijing, 174–181.
  • Shen GM (1992) Ferula. In: Shan RH, She ML (Eds) Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, vol. 55. Science Press, Beijing, 85–120.
login to comment