Research Article
Print
Research Article
Lonicera lanzhouensis (Caprifoliaceae), a new species from Gansu, Northwest China
expand article infoShun Liu, Yu-Jin Wang
‡ Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
Open Access

Abstract

Lonicera lanzhouensis (Caprifoliaceae), a new species from Lanzhou City, Gansu province, China, is described and illustrated. The new species is morphologically similar to L. webbiana in that it has a bilabiate corolla and a long peduncle. It differs by narrowly lanceolate leaves (vs. ovate to ovate-lanceolate), yellow-green corolla at the beginning and reddish-purple when mature (vs. purple-red) and long involucral bracts (vs. short). The new species is supported by the genetic differentiation and phylogenetic analysis based on ITS and the combined sequences of chloroplast psbA-trnH and matK fragments.

Key words:

Lonicera lanzhouensis, molecular phylogeny, new species, taxonomy

Introduction

The genus Lonicera, the second largest genus within the family Caprifoliaceae, is characterized by the combination of leaves opposite, cymes opposite and usually reduced to paired flowers, corolla 5-lobed, stamens 5, berry red, black or green. About 180 species were recognized and distributed in North Africa, Asia, Europe and North America, of which 57 can be found in China (Yang et al. 2011). Hsu and Wang (1988) proposed a system for Chinese species, largely following the world-wide monograph of Rehder (1903), by splitting the genus into two subgenera, i.e., Lonicera and Chamaecerasus. Subg. Chamaecerasus is characterized by two-flowered cymes and free leaves, whereas subg. Lonicera has three-flowered cymes in whorls and perfoliate leaves subtending the inflorescences. Subg. Chamaecerasus, consisted of 53 species, was further divided into four sections, i.e., sect. Coeloxylosteum, sect. Isika, sect. Isoxylosteum and sect. Nintooa, based mainly on habit, pith, bracteole, corolla and ovary. The most specious one, sect. Isika, consisting of 35 species, was divided into eight subsections. Among them, subsect. Alpigenae is defined by the combination of shrubs deciduous, corolla bilabiate, corolla lobes longer than tube which is shallowly gibbous toward base, style and the inner side of the gibbous densely villous. Three species were recognized in this subsection, i.e., L. fargesii, L. oblata and L. webbiana. A number of molecular phylogenetic studies have been conducted for Lonicera, while sect. Isika was recovered as polyphyletic, most subsections were proved to be monophyletic (Srivastav et al. 2023; Sun et al. 2023; Yang et al. 2024).

During our fieldwork in Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, China, several interesting specimens of Lonicera were collected. The leaf shape of these individuals was distinctly different from those of the described species of Lonicera. After careful morphological comparisons and literature consulting, we found that these specimens should be a new species belonging to subsect. Alpigenae of sect. Isika of subg. Chamaecerasus and morphologically similar to L. webbiana. The genetic differentiation and phylogenetic analysis using nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and the combined sequences of chloroplast psbA-trnH and matK fragments supported these specimens as a separate species. In this study, we name it as Lonicera lanzhouensis Shun Liu & Yu J. Wang.

Material and methods

Nine individuals of the new species were collected from Lanzhou City of Gansu province. At the same time, seven individuals of L. webbiana, morphologically resembling the new species and inhabiting similar altitude, was sampled and careful morphological comparison between the two species was made focusing especially on leaves, bract, bracteole, fruit and corolla in different periods. For phylogenetic analysis, both species, and additionally, 24 species representative of different sections of Lonicera were sampled. In total, 40 samples of ingroups and one sample of outgroup, according to the recent phylogenetic studies (Fan et al. 2018; Wang et al. 2021), were sampled and the accession number and collection information are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

The materials used for phylogenetic analyses of Lonicera lanzhouensis. All voucher specimen were sampled from China.

Taxon Voucher specimen Source Genebank NO. (ITS, psbA-trnH, matK) Coordinate
L. caerulea Y. J. Wang WYJ201904026 (LZU) Ruoergai, Sichuan OM952618 OM987816 OM987816 33.445044°N,103.424365°E
L. ferdinandi Y. J. Wang WYJ201904069 (LZU) Yongdeng, Gansu OM952611 OM987809 OM987810 36.595757°N,102.789116°E
L. gynochlamydea Y. J. Wang WYJ201904014 (LZU) Kangxian, Gansu OM952647 OM987845 OM987846 33.362872°N,105.833188°E
L. rupicola Y. J. Wang WYJ201904047 (LZU) Menyuan, Qinghai OM952537 OM987735 OM987736 37.619121°N,101.321653°E
L. fragrantissima Y. J. Wang WYJ201904229 (LZU) Fengxian, Shanxi OM952656 OM987854 OM987856 34.244038°N,106.931784°E
L. scabrida Y. J. Wang WYJ201904193 (LZU) Muli,Sichuan OM952777 OM987975 OM987976 28.473993°N,100.531588°E
L. hispida Y. J. Wang WYJ201904124 (LZU) Ruoergai, Sichuan OM952778 OM987976 OM987977 33.445044°N,103.424365°E
L. stephanocarpa Y. J. Wang WYJ201904128 (LZU) Liuba, Shanxi OM952792 OM987990 OM987991 33.693231°N,106.696817°E
L. litangensis Y. J. Wang WYJ201904157 (LZU) Songpan, Sichuan OM952794 OM987992 OM987993 32.443073°N,103.453454°E
L. microphylla Y. J. Wang WYJ201904094 (LZU) Tianzhu, Gansu OM952661 OM987887 OM987887 36.701042°N,102.748843°E
L. tangutica Y. J. Wang WYJ201904004 (LZU) Ruoergai, Sichuan OM952669 OM987857 OM987858 33.192257°N,103.452894°E
L. acuminata Y. J. Wang WYJ201904037 (LZU) Shimian, Sichuan OM952571 OM987769 OM987770 29.172155°N,102.244466°E
L. japonica Y. J. Wang WYJ201904064 (LZU) Liuba, Shanxi OM952606 OM987804 OM987805 33.535809°N,106.971391°E
L. similis Y. J. Wang WYJ201904060 (LZU) Huixian, Gansu OM952563 OM987761 OM987762 33.609354°N, 106.135348°E
L. lanceolata Y. J. Wang WYJ201904018 (LZU) Wenchuan, Sichuan OM952747 OM987945 OM987946 31.303924°N,103.466311°E
L. nervosa Y. J. Wang WYJ201904109 (LZU) Tianzhu, Gansu OM952724 OM987922 OM987923 36.692745°N,102.699308°E
L. retusa Y. J. Wang WYJ201904098 (LZU) Fengxian, Shanxi OM952697 OM987895 OM987896 34.062340°N,106.849433°E
L. chrysantha Y. J. Wang WYJ201904104 (LZU) Tianzhu, Gansu OM952708 OM987906 OM987907 36.714637°N,102.720511°E
L. crassifolia Y. J. Wang WYJ201904009 (LZU) Jiulong, Sichuan OM952773 OM987971 OM987972 29.125733°N,102.056948°E
L. trichosantha Y. J. Wang WYJ201904008 (LZU) Hanyuan, Sichuan OM952759 OM987957 OM987958 29.263633°N,102.501835°E
L. maackii Y. J. Wang WYJ201904006 (LZU) Wenxian, Gansu OM952738 OM987936 OM987937 32.523705°N,104.373583°E
L. ruprechtiana Y. J. Wang WYJ201904113 (LZU) Yi’an, Heilongjiang OM952734 OM987932 OM987933 47.912548°N,125.305214°E
L. tragophylla Y. J. Wang WYJ201904039 (LZU) Fengxian, Shanxi OM952529 OM987727 OM987728 34.244038°N,106.931784°E
L. ligustrina Y. J. Wang WYJ201904003 (LZU) Shimian, Sichuan OM952632 OM987830 OM987831 29.190707°N,102.254878°E
L. webbiana Y. J. Wang WYJ201904100 (LZU) Ruoergai, Sichuan OM952698 OM987896 OM987897 33.192257°N,103.452894°E
L. webbiana Y. J. Wang WYJ201904101 (LZU) Lanzhou, Gansu OM952699 OM987897 OM987898 35.885937°N,103.903642°E
L. webbiana Y. J. Wang WYJ201904102 (LZU) Lanzhou, Gansu OM952700 OM987898 OM987899 35.898251°N,103.896021°E
L. webbiana Y. J. Wang WYJ201904272 (LZU) Lanzhou, Gansu OM952701 OM987899 OM987900 35.915682°N,103.907493°E
L. webbiana Y. J. Wang WYJ201904273 (LZU) Lanzhou, Gansu OM952702 OM987900 OM987901 35.915682°N,103.907493°E
L. webbiana Y. J. Wang WYJ201904274 (LZU) Lanzhou, Gansu OM952703 OM987901 OM987902 35.915682°N,103.907494°E
L. webbiana Y. J. Wang WYJ201904277 (LZU) Lanzhou, Gansu OM952704 OM987902 OM987903 35.915682°N,103.907495°E
L. lanzhouensis Y. J. Wang WYJ201904106 (LZU) Lanzhou, Gansu OM952715 OM987913 OM987914 36.719479°N,102.620805°E
L. lanzhouensis Y. J. Wang WYJ201904107 (LZU) Lanzhou, Gansu OM952716 OM987914 OM987915 36.712555°N,102.631604°E
L. lanzhouensis Y. J. Wang WYJ201904108 (LZU) Lanzhou, Gansu OM952717 OM987915 OM987916 36.810001°N,102.994549°E
L. lanzhouensis Y. J. Wang WYJ201904287 (LZU) Lanzhou, Gansu OM952718 OM987916 OM987917 36.726978°N,102.603234°E
L. lanzhouensis Y. J. Wang WYJ201904288 (LZU) Lanzhou, Gansu OM952719 OM987917 OM987918 36.727188°N,102.605435°E
L. lanzhouensis Y. J. Wang WYJ201904289 (LZU) Lanzhou, Gansu OM952720 OM987918 OM987919 36.7192°N,102.621335°E
L. lanzhouensis Y. J. Wang WYJ201904290 (LZU) Lanzhou, Gansu OM952721 OM987919 OM987920 36.710396°N,102.634037°E
L. lanzhouensis Y. J. Wang WYJ201904291 (LZU) Lanzhou, Gansu OM952722 OM987920 OM987921 36.707924°N,102.635953°E
L. lanzhouensis Y. J. Wang WYJ201904292 (LZU) Lanzhou, Gansu OM952723 OM987921 OM987922 36.707694°N,102.698808°E
Symphoricarpos sinensis Y. J. Wang WYJ201904158 (LZU) Wenxian, Gansu OM952564 KP297634 MK136238 32.518879°N,104.445264°E

Total DNA was extracted from fresh leaves using the modified CTAB method (Doyle and Dickson 1987). The nuclear ribosome ITS and the chloroplast psbA-trnH and matK fragments were sequenced and submitted to NCBI following Chen and Wang (2018). We concatenated the two chloroplast fragments into one matrix and two datasets, i.e., ITS and chloroplast (CP) concatenated sequences, were used in the following analyses. MEGA 11.0.13 (Tamura et al. 2021) was used to align the two datasets and calculate the genetic distances. MrBayes 3.1.2 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001) was used to make Bayesian Inference (BI) under the GTR+G model, with 4 chains run at the same time, the temperature and other parameters of the chain took the default value. The analysis was performed 10 million times, sampling was taken every 1000 generations. The convergence of the data was detected by Tracer1.7 (Rambaut et al. 2018), which ensured that the ESS > efficiently sampled 200. The first 25% of the trees were discarded as burn-in, whereas the remaining trees were used to calculate the 50% majority consensus tree using PAUP4.0 (Swofford 2002).

Results

Besides the conspicuous difference in the shape of leaf, we further found that the new species differentiated from L. webbiana in the shape of bract. At the same time, the color of corolla varied in different periods of blossoms for the new species, but that of L. webbiana remained purple-red for most time (Figs 1, 2). The aligned ITS sequence matrix contained 742, of which 97 were varied and 39 were parsimony informative. The average distance among the ingroups is 2.08%, and ranged from 0 (between L. crassifolia and L. trichosantha) to 5.4% (between L. japonica and L. trichosantha or L. crassifolia). No intraspecies distance was detected within the new species or L. webbiana and the inter-species distance between the two species is 0.27%, identical to that between L. lanceolata and L. nervosa. The phylogenetic analysis recovered 11 well supported clades (Fig. 3), including one composed of the new species, L. webbiana (PP = 58) and L. ligustrina, but the relationship among the clades is unclear. The aligned CP sequence contained 1335 bp, of which 92 are varied and 46 are parsimony informative. The average distance among the ingroups is 1.46%. The distances between L. hispida and L. stephanocarpa (0), L. crassifolia and L. trichosantha (0.01%), L. lanceolata and L. nervosa (0.01%), L. crassifolia and L. chrysantha (0.3%) are among the lowest and the counterpart of ITS are 1.1%, 0, 0, 0.27%, respectively. The distance between L. litangensis and L. retusa (3%) is the largest with a counterpart of ITS 2.8%. The inter-species distance between the new species and L. webbiana is 0.72% and additionally, a deletion of 7-base pairs was detected in the new species. The intraspecies distance within L. webbiana was 0.02% while that within the new species is 0. The results (Fig. 3) from phylogenetic analysis are slightly different from that of ITS, such as the division of two major clades corresponding to the two subgenera. But the close relationship between the new species and L. webbiana is similarly supported in that they formed a subclade (PP = 100) sister to the subclade composed of L. ligustrina from sect. Isika and L. rupicola from sect. Isoxylosteum (PP = 68).

Figure 1. 

Lonicera lanzhouensis A habitat B whole individual C adaxial surface of leaf D abaxial surface of leaf E corolla at different stages F fruit.

Figure 2. 

The comparison of involucral bracts between L. lanzhouensis (Left) and L. webbiana (Right).

Figure 3. 

Bayesian Inference (BI) based on ITS (A) and the concatenated sequences of psbA-trnH and matK (B). Posterior probabilities (PP) are indicated above branches. The digits following the species name represent the last three digits of the specimen number.

Discussion

On the basis of erect shrub, bilabiate flower with short tube gibbous on ventral side toward base, the new specie could be easily assigned to subsect. Alpigenae of sect. Isika of subg. Chamaecerasus. Phylogenetic analysis from both CP and ITS revealed that the new species and L. webbiana, a member of subsect. Alpigenae, formed a monophyletic clade within Lonicera. The genetic distances between the new species and L. webbiana, are 0.27% based on ITS or 0.72% based on CP dataset. Such a low distance, on the one hand, supported their similarity in morphology and on the other hand, imply the scenario to treat them as two varieties. But we prefer the treatment of two species in that 1) their distance based on ITS are larger than L. crassifolia and L. trichosantha, from sect. Nintooa and sect. Coeloxylosteum, respectively, 2) their distance based on CP is significant and larger than many species-pairs; 3) the morphological difference in the length of bract, the shape of leaf and the color of corolla is distinct. Therefore, both morphology and molecular evidences, including CP and ITS, are consistent and support the closely relationship between the new species and L. webbiana, and at the same time, their distinction.

Taxonomic treatment

Lonicera lanzhouensis Shun Liu & Yu J. Wang, sp. nov.

Figs 1, 2

Type.

China • Gansu: Lanzhou, 36.810001°N, 102.994549°E, 3012 m elev., May thirtieth, 2022, Y. J. Wang WYJ201904293 (Holotype, LZU!; Isotypes, LZU!), Figs 1, 2.

Description.

Shrub erect, up to 2 m tall. Stems cylindrical, branched. Branches solid with white pith. Petiole 1.5–2.5 cm long, inconspicuously pubescent. Leaves opposite, leaf blade narrowly lanceolate, stiffly papery, 2–4 cm × 0.5–0.8 cm, hairy, narrow, margin with irregular undulations, entire, apex tapering. Inflorescence thyrsoid, axillary, cymes opposite and reduced to paired flowers, pedunculate with a pair of bracts and 2 pairs of bracteoles; bracts long, ca. 4.5 mm × 0.5 mm, bracteoles wide and short, ca. 0.5 mm × 0.5 mm. Paired flowers with free ovaries. Pedicels 1.5–2.5 cm long, Calyx 5-lobed, with sparse glandular hair. Corolla bilabiate, yellow-green at the beginning, turns into reddish-purple after anthesis, ca. 1.4 × 0.5 cm; tube shallowly to deeply gibbous toward base, outside sparsely spreading hairy, inside puberulent; lower lip slightly recurved; upper lip 4-lobed to middle. Stamens subequaling corolla, filaments pubescent. Ovary inferior, locules 2; style ca. 1.1 cm long, slender, hairy; stigmas capitate. Fruit a berry, round, green, turns red when mature, ca. 0.6 cm in diameter.

L. lanzhouensis is morphologically most similar to L. webbiana and can be readily distinguished from it by having narrow leaves, yellow-green flowers at the beginning and reddish-purple when mature, and long involucrate bracts. In contrast, L. webbiana has ovate-elliptic to ovate-lanceolate leaves, red flowers and short involucrate bracts.

Phenology.

Flowering: May to June, Fruiting: June.

Distribution and habitat.

L. lanzhouensis is found only in Lanzhou, Gansu, China with a population of about 500 individuals. It grows in a spruce forest at elevation of 2870–3300 m.

Additional specimens examined.

China • Gansu: Lanzhou City, Yongdeng County, 36.719479°N, 102.620805°E, 3271 m elev., June 27th, 2018, Y. J. Wang WYJ201904106 (LZU!); • 36.712555°N, 102.631604°E, 3254 m elev., June 27th, 2018, Y. J. Wang WYJ201904107 (LZU!); • 36.810001°N, 102.994549°E, 3012 m elev., July 1st, 2018, Y. J. Wang WYJ201904108 (LZU!); • 36.726978°N, 102.603234°E, 3300 m elev., July 12th, 2018, Y. J. Wang WYJ201904287 (LZU!); • 36.727188°N, 102.605435°E, 3211 m elev., July 12th, 2018, Y. J. Wang WYJ201904288 (LZU!); • 36.7192°N, 102.621335°E, 3005 m elev., July 13th, 2018, Y. J. Wang WYJ201904289 (LZU!); • 36.710396°N, 102.634037°E, 2907 m elev., July 13th, 2018, Y. J. Wang WYJ201904290 (LZU!); • 36.707924°N, 102.635953°E, 2878 m elev., July 13th, 2018, Y. J. Wang WYJ201904291 (LZU!); • 36.707694°N,102.698808°E, 3297 m elev., August 19th, 2019, Y. J. Wang WYJ201904292 (LZU!).

Chinese name.

Lanzhou rendong (兰州忍冬).

Etymology.

The specific epithet indicates its type locality, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, China.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This work was supported by Science and Technology Plan Project of Gansu Province (23ZDNA009).

Author contributions

Supervision: YJW. Writing – original draft: SL.

Author ORCIDs

Yu-Jin Wang https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7448-7526

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  • Chen J, Wang Y-J (2018) New Saussurea (Asteraceae) species from Bogeda Mountain, eastern Tianshan, China, and inference of its evolutionary history and medical usage. PLoS ONE 13(7): e0199416. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199416
  • Doyle JJ, Dickson EE (1987) Preservation of plant samples for DNA restriction endonuclease analysis. Taxon 36(4): 715–722. https://doi.org/10.2307/1221122
  • Fan W-B, Wu Y, Yang J, Shahzad K, Li Z-H (2018) Comparative Chloroplast Genomics of Dipsacales Species: Insights Into Sequence Variation, Adaptive Evolution, and Phylogenetic Relationships. Frontiers in Plant Science 9: 689. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00689
  • Hsu PS, Wang HJ (1988) Lonicera. In Hsu PS (Ed.) Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae Vol. 72. Science Press, Beijing, 143–259.
  • Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA (2018) Posterior summarization in bayesian phylogenetics using tracer 1.7′. Systematic Biology 67(5): 901–904. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032
  • Srivastav M, Clement WL, Landrein S, Landrein S, Zhang J-N, Howarth DG, Donoghue MJ (2023) A phylogenomic analysis of Lonicera and its bearing on the evolution of organ fusion. American Journal of Botany 110(4): e16143. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.16143
  • Sun Q-H, Morales-Briones DF, Wang H-X, Landis JB, Wen J, Wang HF (2023) Target sequence capture data shed light on the deeper evolutionary relationships of subgenus Chamaecerasus in Lonicera (Caprifoliaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 184: 107808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2023.107808
  • Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
  • Wang HX, Morales‐Briones DF, Moore MJ, Wen J, Wang H-F (2021) A phylogenomic perspective on gene tree conflict and character evolution in Caprifoliaceae using target enrichment data, with Zabelioideae recognized as a new subfamily. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 59(5): 897–914. https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12745
  • Yang Q-E, Landrein S, Osborne J, Borosova R (2011) Caprifoliaceae. In Wu Z-Y, Raven PH, Hong D-Y (Eds) Flora of China Vol. 19. Science Press, Beijing and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, 616–641.
  • Yang X-L, Sun Q-H, Morales-Briones DF, Landis JB, Chen D-J, Wang H-X, Wen J, Wang HF (2024) New insights into infrageneric relationships of Lonicera (Caprifoliaceae) as revealed by nuclear ribosomal DNA cistron data and plastid phylogenomics. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 62(3): 333–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.13014
login to comment