Research Article
Print
Research Article
Schnabelia jiuzhaigouensis (Lamiaceae, Ajugoideae), a new species from Sichuan, China
expand article infoFei Zhao, Peng-Wei Gao§|, Ting Zhang§, Cheng Liu§, Chun-Lei Xiang§
‡ Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, China
§ Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
| University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Open Access

Abstract

Schnabelia jiuzhaigouensis C. Liu, F. Zhao & C.L. Xiang, a new species from north-eastern Sichuan, China, is described, based on both morphological and molecular phylogenetic evidence. Morphologically, the new species is mostly similar to S. terniflora, but can be readily distinguished by its habit, ovate to lanceolate-ovate leaf blades, the presence of 5–8 lateral veins on each side of the mid-rib and distinct characteristics of the floral structure, including oblong upper lip and lateral lobes of the lower lip, with the middle lobe being cuneate. In addition, the nutlets are puberulent and lack reticulate venation. Molecular phylogenetic analyses place the new species at a basal position within the genus Schnabelia. The new species is categorised as Data Deficient (DD) according to the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. A key to all species of Schnabelia is also provided.

Key words:

Ajugeae, morphology, new species, Schnabelia, taxonomy

Introduction

Schnabelia Hand.-Mazz. (Lamiaceae, Ajugoideae) is a small genus endemic to China. The genus was first described by Handel-Mazzetti (1921), based on specimens collected from Hunan Province in central China. The taxonomic placement and circumscription of Schnabelia have long been debated. Initially, in the traditional taxonomic treatment (Handel-Mazzetti 1921; Chen 1977; Chen and Gilbert 1994), the genus was placed within Verbenaceae, containing only two species (S. oligophylla Hand.-Mazz. and S. tetrodonta (Y.Z.Sun) C.Y.Wu & C.Chen), both characterised by 4-winged stems. However, based on the character of the deeply-lobed ovaries, P’ei (1932) transferred Schnabelia to the family Lamiaceae, associating it with Ajuga L. and Teucrium L., a classification supported by P’ei and Chen (1977). Cladistic analysis using morphological data by Cantino et al. (1999) revealed that the traditionally defined Caryopteris Bunge was not monophyletic and led to the transfer of three species of Caryopteris (i.e. C. aureoglandulosa (Vaniot) C.Y.Wu, C. nepetifolia (Benth.) Maxim. and C. terniflora Maxim) to Schnabelia. Subsequent molecular phylogenetic analyses (Huang 2002; Shi et al. 2003) further confirmed that at least the latter two species are closely related to S. oligophylla.

Recently, based on broad sampling and comprehensive evidence from morphological and molecular data, Xiang et al. (2018) reconstructed the backbone phylogeny of Ajugoideae. Their analyses confirmed the findings of Cantino et al. (1999), supporting the non-monophyly of the traditional circumscribed Caryopteris and monophyly of the re-defined Schnabelia. Furthermore, Xiang et al. (2018) divided Schnabelia into two sections. Sect. Schnabelia consists of two species (S. oligophylla and S. tetrodonta), characterised by perennial herb, 4-winged stems, caducous leaves and nutlets puberulent. In contrast, sect. Cylindricaulis C.L.Xiang & H.Peng includes three species (S. aureoglandulosa, S. nepetifolia and S. terniflora), characterised by subshrubs, nearly terete stems without wings, persistent leaves and densely hirsute nutlets with distinct reticulate venation.

As an endemic genus, all species of Schnabelia are distributed across central, northern, southern and south-western China, primarily inhabiting the slopes of mountains within subtropic forests (Wu and Li 1977; Xiang et al. 2018; Wang 2019; Zhao et al. 2021; Wang and Hong 2022). During a field expedition in Sichuan Province in 2019, we discovered an intriguing species of Schnabelia. Through comparative morphological studies and molecular phylogenetic analyses using plastid and nuclear DNA sequences, we determined this species as a new species of the genus Schnabelia and describe and illustrate it here.

Material and methods

Plant materials

Two populations of the potential new species were collected from Jiuzhaigou County, north-eastern Sichuan, in July 2019. Field photographs and phenological data were recorded during the collection. Fresh leaves were collected and dried with silica-gel for DNA extraction (Chase and Hills 1991). Mature nutlets were also collected in the field. Voucher specimens are deposited in the Herbarium of Kunming Institute of Botany (KUN) and Herbarium of Chengdu Institute of Biology (CDBI), Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Morphological study

Morphological characteristics of stems, leaves, inflorescences and flowers of the new species were photographed and measured from living plants and dried specimens. Nutlets were photographed using a Keyence VHX-700F Digital Microscope (Keyence, Osaka, Japan). All morphological features were described following the terminology of Li and Hedge (1994). In addition, specimens of all Schnabelia deposited in BM, CDBI, IBK, IBSC, K, KUN, NAS, NWTC, PE, SM, SZ, WCSBG and WUK were thoroughly examined for morphological comparison.

Molecular phylogenetic analyses

In order to clarify the systematic position of the new species within Schnabelia, we reconstructed the phylogeny of Schnabelia using seven DNA markers, as employed by Xiang et al. (2018): the nuclear ribosomal internal and external transcribed spacers (ITS and ETS) and five plastid DNA regions (matK, rbcL, rps16, trmL-trnF and trnH-psbA). Total Genomic DNA was extracted from silica-gel dried leaf tissue of two individuals of the new species using the modified CTAB method (Doyle and Doyle 1987). Primers details, Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) amplification, sequencing and PCR protocols followed those described by Xiang et al. (2018). In total, 112 accessions, representing all five recognised species and the potential new species of the Schnabelia were included as the ingroup. Six species from Teucrieae (viz. Rubiteucris Kudô and Teucrium L.) were selected as outgroup, based on previous phylogenetic frameworks (Xiang et al. 2018; Zhao et al. 2021). The accession numbers for the newly-sequenced samples have been deposited in the GenBank under PQ581109PQ581112, PQ588101PQ588102 and PQ594948PQ594955 and voucher information for all species is provided in the Table 1.

Table 1.

Information of the samples used for phylogenetic inference in this study. Sequences newly generated in this study are highlighted in bold font.

Taxa Voucher Location matK rbcL rps16 trnL-trnF trnH-psbA ITS ETS
Schnabelia tetrodonta (Y.Z. Sun) C.Y. Wu & C. Chen 1 Xiang et al., 352(KUN) Chongqing, Nanchuan MF801745 MF801799 MF801857 MF801949 MF801899 MF801694 MF801659
Schnabelia tetrodonta (Y.Z. Sun) C.Y. Wu & C. Chen 2 Yang et al., 001(KUN) Yunnan, Menglun MF801746 MF801800 MF801858 MF801950 MF801900 MF801695 MF801660
Schnabelia oligophylla Hand.-Mazz. 1 Xiang et al., 353(KUN) Chongqing, Nanchuan MF801738 MF801792 MF801850 MF801942 MF801892 MF801687 MF801652
Schnabelia oligophylla Hand.-Mazz. 2 Xiang et al., sn.(Cultivate) Hubei, Enshi MF801739 MF801793 MF801851 MF801943 MF801893 MF801688 MF801653
Schnabelia oligophylla Hand.-Mazz. 3 Liu Yanchun, 003(Cultivate) Shanghai MF801740 MF801794 MF801852 MF801944 MF801894 MF801689 MF801654
Schnabelia nepetifolia (Benth.) P.D. Cantino 1 Xiang et al. 590(Cultivate) Jiangsu, Nanjing MF801735 MF801789 MF801847 MF801939 MF801889 MF801684 MF801649
Schnabelia nepetifolia (Benth.) P.D. Cantino 2 Liu Yanchun, 002(KUN) Shanghai MF801736 MF801790 MF801848 MF801940 MF801890 MF801685 MF801650
Schnabelia nepetifolia (Benth.) P.D. Cantino 3 P. D. Cantino, 1428(KUN) American MF801737 MF801791 MF801849 MF801941 MF801891 MF801686 MF801651
Schnabelia terniflora (Maxim.) P.D. Cantino 1 Xiang et al., 079(Cultivate) Yunnan, Kunming MF801741 MF801795 MF801853 MF801945 MF801895 MF801690 MF801655
Schnabelia terniflora (Maxim.) P.D. Cantino 2 Fang et al., fw11146(KUN) Gansu, Kang MF801742 MF801796 MF801854 MF801946 MF801896 MF801691 MF801656
Schnabelia terniflora (Maxim.) P.D. Cantino 3 Xiang et al., 749(KUN) Hubei, Shengnongjia MF801743 MF801797 MF801855 MF801947 MF801897 MF801692 MF801657
Schnabelia terniflora (Maxim.) P.D. Cantino 4 Liu Yanchun, 001(KUN) Shanghai MF801744 MF801798 MF801856 MF801948 MF801898 MF801693 MF801658
Schnabelia aureoglandulosa (Vaniot) P.D. Cantino 1 Xiang et al., 345(KUN) Chongqing, Nanchuan MF801733 MF801787 MF801845 MF801937 MF801887 MF801682 MF801647
Schnabelia aureoglandulosa (Vaniot) P.D. Cantino 2 Liu et al., 3986(KUN) Yunnan, Funing MF801734 MF801788 MF801846 MF801938 MF801888 MF801683 MF801648
Schnabelia jiuzhaigouensis C. Liu, F. Zhao & C.L. Xiang sp. nov. 1 Zhang et al., 19CS18246 (KUN) Sichuan, Jiuzhaigou PQ594948 PQ594950 PQ581109 PQ581111 PQ594952 PQ588101 PQ594954
Schnabelia jiuzhaigouensis C. Liu, F. Zhao & C.L. Xiang sp. nov. 2 Zhang et al., 19CS18370 (KUN) Sichuan, Jiuzhaigou PQ594949 PQ594951 PQ581110 PQ581112 PQ594953 PQ588102 PQ594955
Outgroup
Teucrium ornatum Hemsl. Xiang et al., 332(KUN) Chongqing, Wuxi MF801748 MF801803 MF801862 MF801952 MF801902 MF801696 MF801662
Teucrium quadrifarium Buch.-Ham. ex D. Don Xiang et al., s.n.(KUN) Yunnan, Funing MF801749 MF801804 MF801863 MF801953 MF801903 MF801697 MF801663
Teucrium viscidum Blume Liu et al., 3083(KUN) Gansu, Wenxian HQ839703 MF801805 MF801864 MF801954 FJ513102 MF801698 MF801664
Teucrium bidentatum Hemsl. Xiang et al., 336(KUN) Chongqing, Jinfoshan MF801747 MF801802 MF801861 MF801951 MF801901 AF477790 MF801661
Rubiteucris palmata (Benth. ex Hook. f.) Kudô Liu et al., 2998(KUN) Sichuan, Yanyuan MF801730 MF801784 MF801842 MF801934 MF801884 MF801679 MF801644
Rubiteucris siccanea (W.W. Sm.) P.D. Cantino 2 Xiang et al., 847(KUN) Yunnan, Yuanjiang MF801731 MF801785 MF801843 MF801935 MF801885 MF801680 MF801645
Rubiteucris siccanea (W.W. Sm.) P.D. Cantino 1 Xiang et al., 365(KUN) Yunnan, Songming MF801732 MF801786 MF801844 MF801936 MF801886 MF801681 MF801646

Sequences were aligned using MAFFT V. 7.505 (Katoh and Standley 2013), with any ambiguous sites adjusted manually in PhyDE v.0.9971(Müller et al. 2010). Two datasets were constructed for phylogenetic reconstruction. The first dataset (5CP) combined matK, rbcL, rps16, trnL-trnF and trnH-psbA, while the second dataset (2NR) combined nrITS and ETS sequences.

Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) methods. The ML analysis was run on the CIPRES Science Gateway web server (http://www.phylo.org/; Miller et al. 2010) with RAxML V. 8.2.10 (Stamatakis 2014) under the GTR + Γ substitution model. The partitioned model (-q) was used for the concatenated plastid data, bootstrap iterations (-# | -N) set to 1000 and other parameters followed default settings. The BI analysis was performed in MrBayes 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012). The best-fit substitution model of each region was selected independently under the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) using jModelTest2 (Darriba et al. 2012). For each Bayesian analysis, four MCMC chains (three heated, one cold) were run simultaneously for 20 million generations, starting with a random tree and sampled every 1000 generations. Chain convergence and estimated sample size (ESS) parameters were assessed with Tracer v.1.7.0 (Rambaut et al. 2018), with the first 25% of the trees obtained in BI analysis being discarded as burn-in and then posterior probabilities (PP) were determined from the posterior distribution. The phylogenetic trees were visualised in FigTree v.1.4.3 (Rambaut 2014; http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/).

Results and discussion

A total of 14 DNA sequences were newly generated in this study, including the seven DNA regions from two accessions of the potential new species. The combined plastid dataset had an aligned length of 4,689 bp (1,136 bp for matK, 1,258 bp for rbcL, 839 bp for trnL-trnF, 1008 bp for rps16 and 448 bp for trnH-psbA), while the combined nuclear dataset was 992 bp (532 bp for ITS, 460 bp for ETS), respectively.

The phylogenetic topologies from Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) analyses were congruent, so only the ML trees were provided for discussion (Figs 1, 2). Both analyses strongly supported the monophyly of Schnabelia (ML-BS = 100%, BI-PP = 1.00; all values follow this order hereafter), with the genus Rubiteucris found to be sister to Schnabelia (100%/1.00). The phylogenetic tree constructed in this study is largely consistent with previous studies, based on the plastid DNA (Li et al. 2016; Xiang et al. 2018; Zhao et al. 2021).

Figure 1. 

Phylogenetic relationship of Schnabelia, based on the (5CPDNA) dataset. The support values (BS/PP) indicated at branches. BS values < 50% and PP support < 90% indicated by -. The outgroup and recognised groups are marked in the right bar.

Figure 2. 

Phylogenetic relationship of Schnabelia, based on the (2NR) dataset. The support values (BS/PP) indicated at branches. BS values < 50% and PP support < 90% indicated by -. The outgroup and recognised groups are marked in the right bar.

Within Schnabelia, the two accessions of the new species formed a clade (Fig. 1: 100/1.00; Fig. 2: 100/1.00). In the plastid phylogenetic tree, the two individuals of the new species formed a subclade sister to the remaining five species and relationships amongst these species were consistent with previous studies (Xiang et al. 2018). In addition, each species formed a monophyletic subclade (Fig. 1).

However, the nuclear phylogenetic tree revealed three subclades. The first subclade included two accessions of the new species and three individuals of Schnabelia oligophylla, forming a moderately supported subclade (Fig. 2. 73/0.94). The second subclade consisted of two individuals of S. tetrodonta (Fig. 2. BS/PP = 69/-), while the third subclade (BS/PP = 99/1.00) consisted of the remaining three species (S. nepetifolia, S. aureoglandulosa and S. terniflora). The relationship amongst species within this subclade were consistent with those found in the plastid phylogenetic tree.

Morphologically, based on its non-winged stem and persistent leaves, the potential new species should be placed within sect. Cylindricaulis. It is most similar to Schnabelia terniflora, but can be distinguished by differences in habit, leaf characteristics, corolla shape and the surface ornamentation of the nutlets. Detailed morphological differences between the two species are summarised in Table 2.

Table 2.

Morphological comparisons between Schnabelia jiuzhaigouensis and S. terniflora.

Characters S. jiuzhaigouensis S. terniflora
Habit perennial herb shrub
Lamina ovate to lanceolate-ovate leaf blades, 2–8 × 1.5–4 cm, lateral veins 5–8 lanceolate-oblong to ovate, 1.5–4 × 1–3 cm), lateral veins 3–6
Corolla upper lip and lateral lobes of lower lip oblong, middle lobe cuneate, corolla outside puberulent with non-glandular upper lip and lateral lobes of lower lip broadly obovate, middle lobe subrounded, corolla outside puberulent with glandular
Nutlets puberulent, without reticulate veins densely hirsute, with distinctly reticulate veins

Taxonomic treatment

Schnabelia jiuzhaigouensis C.Liu, F.Zhao & C.L.Xiang, sp. nov.

Fig. 3

Type.

China • Sichuan Province, Jiuzhaigou County, in the vicinity of Wujiao Ranger Station of Wujiao Nature Reserve, the wet area along the stream, under the mixed forest, 32°54′42″N, 104°14′38″E, 2599 m a.s.l., 12 July 2019, flowering, Ting Zhang, C. Liu, H. Jiang, Y.L. He & C.H. Li 19CS18246 (holotype: KUN 1630399!), (isotype: KUN 1630400!; CDBI0290980!)

Figure 3. 

Morphology of Schnabelia jiuzhaigouensis. A, B habitat C leaf morphology D frontal view of inflorescence E lateral view of inflorescence F lateral view of flowers and filaments (Scale bar: 5 mm) G frontal view of calyces (Scale bar: 1 mm) H surface of the nutlets. (Scale bars: 1 mm) (Photo by Cheng Liu).

Diagnosis.

Schnabelia jiuzhaigouensis is most similar to S. terniflora, but can be distinguished by several morphological differences. Schnabelia jiuzhaigouensis is a perennial herb (vs. shrub), with ovate to lanceolate-ovate leaf blades, 2–8 × 1.5–4 cm (vs. lanceolate-oblong to ovate, 1.5–4 × 1–3 cm in S. terniflora), the lateral veins on each side of the mid-rib number 5–8 (vs. 3–6 in S. terniflora).The upper lip and lateral lobes of the lower lip are oblong in S. jiuzhaigouensis (vs. broadly obovate in S. terniflora) and the middle lobe is cuneate (vs. subrounded). The corolla is puberulent on the outside, but non-glandular (vs. puberulent and glandular in S. terniflora) and the nutlets puberulent (vs. densely hirsute), with S. jiuzhaigouensis lacking reticulate veins on the nutlets (vs. with distinctly reticulate veins in S. terniflora). The differences between the new species and S. terniflora are summarised in Table 2.

Description.

Perennial herbs, erect, 20–60 cm tall. Stems 4-angled and puberulent, occasionally branched from base; internodes 1–11 cm long, puberulent. Leaves opposite, petiole 0.3–2.5 cm long, puberulent; leaf blades ovate to lanceolate-ovate, papery, 2–8 × 1.5–4 cm, puberulent on both surfaces, hairs denser along veins abaxially, base broadly cuneate to rounded or subcordate, apex acuminate, margin serrate, lateral veins 5–8 on each side of the mid-rib. Inflorescences axillary cymes, 1–3 flowered; peduncle slender, (0.5)1.5–3.5 cm, puberulent; pedicels 0.2–1 cm long; bracts lanceolate, ca. 1–2 mm long, glabrous or sparsely hairy, bracteoles lanceolate, 0.5–1 mm long. Calyx campanulate, 10-veined, outside sparsely pubescent; tube 1–1.5 mm long, lobes 5, lanceolate, ca. 2–3 × 1 mm, margin entire, apex acuminate. Corolla pink, 2-lipped, outside sparsely puberulent; tube ca. 5 mm long, both surfaces puberulent; upper lip 2-lobed, lobes oblong, ca. 3–3.5 × 1 mm; lower lip 3-lobed, lateral lobes oblong, ca. 2.5–3 × 1 mm, middle lobe larger, cuneate, 5–6 × 3–4 mm. Stamens and style strongly exserted; stamens 4, inserted near corolla throat, filaments 6–8 mm, basally hairy; style 13–16 mm, glabrous, apex subequally 2-lobed. Ovary pubescent. Nutlets 4, ovoid, puberulent, ca. 3 × 2 mm, without reticulate veins.

Phenology.

Flowering from June to July, fruiting from July to September.

Distribution and habitat.

Currently, S. jiuzhaigouensis is known from two locations in Wujiao Xiang, Jiuzhaigou County, Sichuan, China. It grows under the forest together with species of Picea brachytyla (Franch.) E.Pritz. (Pinaceae), Rosa omeiensis Rolfe (Rosaceae), Impatiens undulata Y.L. Chen & Y.Q. Lu (Balsaminaceae) and Mimulus L., at elevations from 2500 m to 2600 m.

Etymology.

The specific epithet ‘jiuzhaigouensis’ is derived from the type locality Jiuzhaigou County.

Chinese name.

Jiǔ Zhài Gōu Sì Léng Căo (Chinese pronunciation); 九寨沟四棱草 (Chinese name).

Conservation status.

So far, two small populations of Schnabelia jiuzhaigouensis have been observed in the Wujiao Nature Reserve. These populations are geographically close enough to be considered part of a single location. Further detailed investigation of the same habitats is necessary to gain a better understanding of the species’ distribution, abundance and potential threats. Therefore, this species is currently classified as Data Deficient (DD) according to the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria (IUCN 2024).

Additional specimens examined.

Schnabelia jiuzhaigouensis (paratypes). China • Sichuan: Jiuzhaigou County, Jiawuchi scenic spot of Wujiao Xiang, under the forest with the species of Picea brachytyla, 32°58′29″N, 104°09′29″E, 2551 m a.s.l., 15 July 2019, flowering, Ting Zhang, C. Liu, H. Jiang, Y.L. He & C.H. Li 19CS18370 (KUN!).

Specimens of S. terniflora examined.

China, Gansu • Kang County, Qujiagou, 09 Aug 2011, W. Fang et al. fw11146 (KUN), Jia’an Town, Yuanjiawan, 01 May 1963, Y.Q. He & C.L. Tang 145 (WUK) • Tanchang County, Hanban County, 11 Jul 1951, T.P. Wang 14296 (PE) • Wen County, Motianling, Baishui Jiang Nature Reserve, 07 May 2007, D.E. Boufford et al. 37468 (PE), Bikou Town, Yinchanggou, 05 Jul 1964, Q.X. Li & X.C. Zhao 2037 (NWTC), Fanba Town, Heiyinggou, 19 Aug 1976, J.X. Yang 3730 (IBSC); Zhouqu County, Gongbagou, 16 Jul 1998, Baishuijiang Exped. 064 (PE); Hubei • Shennongjia, on the way from Xinhua to Xiaoluoxi, 11 Jun 2013, C.L. Xiang et al. 749 (KUN); Shaanxi • Mian County, Fangjiaba, 12 Apr 1942, K.T. Fu 3529 (PE), Liushuying, 15 Apr 1938, T.P. Wang 9065 (WUK); Nanzheng County, Near Xiaoba Village, 21 Apr 1973, X.X. Hou 496 (WUK); Near Xiaotai Mountain, 07 May 1956, Huanghe Exped. 521 (WUK); Sichuan • Dujiangyan City, Shichangwan, 19 Apr 1952, Z. He 12165 (PE), Erwang Temple, 27 Apr 1987, D.Z. Fu et al. 87-0276 (WCSBG), Qingcheng Mountain, 14 Apr 1930, F.T. Wang 20395 (WUK), Yulei Mountain. 23 Aug 1987, Z.Y. Li et al. 87-1962 (WCSBG); Maerkang County, 11 May 1957, X. Li 70613 (IBSC), Shuadan Road, 17 May 1957, X. Li 70662 (NAS) • Mao County, Fushun Town, Gangou, 1 Aug 1975, Sichuan Veget. Exped. 8680 (CDBI) • Nanping (Jiuzhaigou) County; 26 Oct 1937, T.P. Wang 7974 (PE), 17 May 1979, Anonymous 0098 (SM) • LangZhai Village, 15 Jul 1983, Sichuan Veget. Exped. 30420 (CDBI).

The diagnostic key for Schnabelia

1 Stems 4-winged; leaves caducous, blade pubescent or subglabrous, but lacking subsessile glandular trichomes; calyx deeply lobed to base, teeth 2× as long as tube sect. Schnabelia (2)
Stems nearly terete, not winged; leaves persistent, blade with subsessile glandular trichomes as well as non-glandular hairs; calyx lobed nearly 1⁄2 its length, teeth as long as tube sect.Cylindricaulis (3)
2 Cymes usually reduced to 1 flower; peduncle longer than 7 mm; calyx 5-dentate Schnabelia oligophylla
Cymes usually 1–3-flowered; peduncle less than 2 mm; calyx 4-dentate S. tetrodonta
3 Leaf blade irregularly sharply serrate with 1–3 teeth per side, those subtending cymes subentire; ovary and nutlets with yellow hairs S. aureoglandulosa
Leaf blade, including those subtending cymes, regularly serrate to crenate with 4–10 teeth or lobes per side; ovary and nutlets with white hairs 4
4 Leaf blade crenate with 4–6 rounded lobes per side; flowers always solitary S. nepetifolia
Leaf blade serrate with more than 6 sharp teeth per side; flowers mostly in (2- or) 3–5-flowered cymes, rarely solitary 5
5 Perennial herbs, lateral veins 5–8, upper lip and lateral lobes of lower lip oblong, middle lobe cuneate, nutlets puberulent and without reticulate veins S. jiuzhaigouensis
Shrub, lateral veins 3–6, upper lip and lateral lobes of lower lip broadly obovate, middle lobe subrounded, nutlets densely hirsute and with distinctly reticulate veins S. terniflora

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to the curators of the Herbaria BM, CDBI, IBK, IBSC, K, KUN, NAS, NWTC, PE, SM, SZ, WCSBG and WUK for their assistance in research facilities. The authors also thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and feedback, which greatly improved the quality of our manuscript.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32200175, 32161143015), Science & Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program (No. 2022FY202201), the “Ten Thousand Talents Program of Yunnan” (Top-notch Young Talents Project, No. YNWR-QNBJ-2018-279), the CAS Interdisciplinary Team of the “Light of West China” program and Yunnan Revitalization Talent Support Program “Innovation Team” project to CLX, and the open research project of the Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, grant of the Large-scale Scientific Facilities of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2017-LSFGBOWS-02) and the National Wild Plant Germplasm Resource Center.

Author contributions

CL, TZ discovered the species, CLX, FZ, CL identified the species. CL, PWG performed the experiments, FZ, PWG analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. CLX revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author ORCIDs

Fei Zhao https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7328-2262

Peng-Wei Gao https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0475-9739

Ting Zhang https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0939-8468

Cheng Liu https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7146-2542

Chun-Lei Xiang https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8775-6967

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  • Cantino PD, Wagstaff ST, Olmstead RG (1999) Caryopteris (Lamiaceae) and theconflict between phylogenetic and pragmatic considerations in botanical nomenclature. Systematic Botany 23(3): 369–386. https://doi.org/10.2307/2419511
  • Chase MW, Hills HH (1991) Silica gel: An ideal material for field preservation of leaf samples for DNA studies. Taxon 40(2): 215–220. https://doi.org/10.2307/1222975
  • Chen J (1977) Verbenaceae. Flora Yunnanica, vol. 1. Science Press, Beijing, 390–490.
  • Chen SL, Gilbert MG (1994) Verbenaceae. In: Wu CY, Raven PH (Eds) Flora of China (Vol. 17). Science Press, Beijing; Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, 1–49.
  • Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D (2012) jModel-Test 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9(8): e772. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2109
  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small amounts of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11–15.
  • Handel-Mazzetti (1921) Schnabelia. Denkschriften – Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse. 58: 92.
  • Huang MJ (2002) Systematics of Trichostema L. (Lamiaceae) and phylogenetic relationships with its disjunct taxa in Asia. Ph.D. Dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A.
  • Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(4): 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
  • Li HW, Hedge IC (1994) Lamiaceae. In: Wu CY, Raven PH (Eds) Flora of China, vol. 17. Science Press, Beijing and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, 269–291.
  • Li B, Cantino PD, Olmstead RG, Bramley GLC, Xiang CL, Ma ZH, Tan YH, Zhang DX (2016) A large-scale chloroplast phylogeny of the Lamiaceae sheds new light on its subfamilial classification. Scientific Reports 6(1): 34343. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34343
  • Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE). IEEE Xplore: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129
  • Müller K, Müller J, Quandt D (2010) PhyDe: Phylogenetic data editor, version 0.9971. http://www.phyde.de
  • P’ei C (1932) The Verbenaceae of China. Memoirs of The Science Society of China 1: 1–193.
  • P’ei C, Chen SL (1977) Schnabelia Hand.-Mazz. In: Wu CY, Li HW (Eds) Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae (Vol. 65). Science Press, Beijing, 82–86.
  • Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA (2018) Posterior summarisation in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67(5): syy032. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 6(3): 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  • Shi SH, Du YQ, Boufford DE, Gong X, Huang YL, He HH, Zhong Y (2003) Phylogenetic position of Schnabelia, a genus endemic to China: Evidence from sequences of cpDNA matK gene and ITS regions. Chinese Science Bulletin 48(15): 1576–1580. https://doi.org/10.1360/03wc0081
  • Wang Q (2019) Schnabelia Hand.-Mazz. In: Hong DY (Ed.) Flora of Pan-Himalaya, vol. 44(1). Science Press, Beijing, 45–49.
  • Wang Q, Hong D (2022) Understanding the plant diversity on the roof of the world-A brief review of flora of Pan-Himalaya. Innovation (Cambridge (Mass. )) 3(2): 100215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100215
  • Wu CY, Li HW (1977) Lamiaceae. In: Wu CY, Li HW (Eds) Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae (Vol. 65). Science Press, Beijing, 1–572.
  • Xiang CL, Zhao F, Cantino PD, Drew BT, Li B, Liu ED, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Peng H (2018) Molecular systematics of Caryopteris (lamiaceae) and its allies with reference to the molecular phylogeny of subfamily Ajugoideae. Taxon 67(2): 376–394. https://doi.org/10.12705/672.7
  • Zhao F, Chen YP, Salmaki Y, Drew BT, Wilson TC, Scheen AC, Celep F, Brauchler C, Bendiksby M, Wang Q, Min DZ, Peng H, Olmstead RG, Li B, Xiang CL (2021) An updated tribal classification of Lamiaceae based on plastome phylogenomics. BMC Biology 19(1): 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-020-00931-z
login to comment