Research Article
Print
Research Article
Taxonomic note of Parnassia (Celastraceae): the identity of P. yui
expand article infoShi-Qi Wang, Xue-Mei Zhang, Yu-Min Shu§
‡ China West Normal University, Nanchong, China
§ Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resource Conservation (Ministry of Education), Nanchong, China
Open Access

Abstract

Parnassia farreri is characterised by the petals with long-ciliate petal claw and the broad spatulate staminodes with shallow crenations distally. A sympatric and poorly-known taxon, P. yui, is recorded only from the type collection that morphologically similar to P. farreri. Based on field investigations, examination of herbarium specimens (including the types) and analysis of protologues and distributions, P. yui is hereby reduced to a synonym of P. farreri. Field and anatomy photographs and an updated morphological description of P. farreri are provided. Parnassia farreri is preliminarily designated as Least Concern according to the IUCN Red List guidelines.

Key words

Morphology, Parnassia, staminode, synonymy, taxonomic uncertainty

Introduction

Parnassia L. (Linnaeus 1753) is a fairly homogeneous and distinguishable genus of Celastraceae (APG IV 2016; Ball 2016), consisting of small and glabrous perennial herbs, with a solitary, bisexual and pentamerous flower that has five staminodes borne on an unbranched scape (Ku 1987; Ku and Hultgård 2001). Species of Parnassia predominantly occur in alpine and arctic regions of the Northern Hemisphere, which most diverse in Pan-Himalaya and southwest China (Phillips 1982; Wu et al. 2003; Simmons 2004; Wu 2005). The most recent checklist of Parnassia worldwide was accomplished by Shu et al. (2017) and contains 61 species, two subspecies, 11 varieties and one form. Since then, more than ten names have been reduced to synonyms (Shu et Zhang 2017; Wang et al. 2018; Yu et al. 2018; Ma et al. 2020; Dai et al. 2021) and two new species were described (Zhang et al. 2019).

Parnassia farreri W. E. Evans (1921: 174) was formally described, based on the specimens of R. Farrer 1211 (Fig. 1A) which was collected from Myanmar. The petal base of this species is abruptly contracted into a claw with long ciliated margin, that is distinctive in this genus. Parnassia yui Jien (1963: 256), another species with similar morphological features and neighbouring distribution to P. farreri, was described, based on a single collection (T. T. Yu 20238, Fig. 1B, 24 individuals mounted on four sheets) from Yunnan Province, China. According to the original description, the morphological differences between P. yui and P. farreri include the larger leaves blades (12–24 × 12–24 mm vs. 2–14 × 2–14 mm), the acute or acuminate (vs. rounded) apexes of narrower petals and the three lobed (vs. entire or obscurely sinuate) apex of staminodes.

Figure 1. 

Holotypes of Parnassia farreri (A E00079815) and P. yui (B PE01842927).

Through observation of herbarium specimens, we found these two species are extremely similar in morphology and there is obvious overlap in the shape of leaf blades and staminodes. Therefore, the aim of this study was to clarify the classification relationship between P. farreri and P. yui by re-evaluating their morphological characteristics.

Materials and methods

The type specimens of P. farreri and P. yui, along with other related specimens deposited at KUN, PE and SITC, were meticulously inspected. Additionally, digitised material sourced from Herbaria CAS and E (acronyms according to Thiers (2024)) were carefully examined. Field investigations were carried out during September to October of 2024 in Gongshan County, Yunnan Province, China. Eleven individuals with well-preserved leaves and flowers from the type specimens of P. yui and fifty individuals of P. farreri from the wild were used to conduct the morphological measurement and comparison. Eight morphological characters, i.e. leaf length, leaf width, ratio of leaf length/width, petal length, petal width, ratio of petal length/width, number of staminode lobes and depth of staminode lobes were measured in this study. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed to investigate the morphological variations between P. farreri and P. yui.

Results

During the specific field survey of P. farreri populations in southwest China, we documented continuous variations of leaf blades, the shapes of petals and staminodes (Fig. 2A–E), even sometimes within individuals. No specimens of P. yui were traced, except the type materials. Amongst the individuals from the type materials of P. yui, only a few have oblanceolate petals and shallowly 3-lobed staminodes, that match the original description. Additionally, most individuals have triangular-ovate to ovate-spartulate petals, as well as irregular dentate staminodes apexes (Fig. 2F–G). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) could not distinguish these two taxa, the 95% confidence ellipse of P. farreri being almost included in that of P. yui (Fig. 3). Furthermore, the distribution of P. yui is limited in Gongshan County, Yunnan, China and, in this region, more than ten specimens of P. farreri have been collected. The latter taxon is also distributed in Myanmar and India (Shu et al. 2017; Pankaj et al. 2018). Since the lack of clear morphologic distinctions and the overlapping distribution range, we hereby propose to reduce P. yui to a synonym of P. farreri.

Figure 2. 

Morphology of Parnassia farreri A habitat B flower C leaves D variation of petals E variation of staminodes and P. yui F petals G staminodes, photographed from T. T. Yu 20238, the type specimen.

Figure 3. 

The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) plot for the morphological variations between Parnassia farreri and P. yui. The confidence ellipse level is 95%.

Taxonomic treatments

Parnassia farreri W.E. Evans (1921: 174)

Type

Myanmar • Chimely Valley, in the middle alpine zone, 3300 m, 15 August 1919, R. Farrer 1211 (holotype: E00079815 photo!).

Parnassia yui Jien (1963: 256)

Type

China • Yunnan, Salwin-Kiukiang Divide, northeast of Sinpu, under bamboo thickets, 3000 m, 14 September 1938, T. T. Yu 20238 (holotype: PE01842927!; isotypes: PE01842926!, KUN1205235!, KUN1205238!)

Description

Perennial herbs, glabrous. Rhizome sympodial. Stems 1 to 4, slender, 3–16 cm, with a tiny cauline leaf near middle. Basal leaves 1 to 7, petiole 1–4.5 cm; blade reniform, broad cordate or orbicular, 0.2–2.4 × 0.2–2.8 cm, base cordate, apex rounded or apiculate. Flower 0.8–1.5 cm in diam.; hypanthium turbinate. Sepals oblong, ovate or lanceolate, 2–3 × 1–2 mm, margin entire, apex acute. Petals white, densely purple-brown punctuate when dried, oblanceolate, triangular-ovate, to ovate-spartulate, 3–6 × 1.5–3.5 mm, base contracted into a claw ca. 2 mm, margin long fimbriate proximally, entire distally, apex acute to rounded-obtuse. Anthers ellipsoid, filaments 2–2.5 mm. Staminodes flat, broadly spatulate, 2 × 1–2 mm, apex shallowly 3-lobed, dentate, undulate or rounded. Ovary superior, broadly ovoid; style ca. 1 mm; stigma 3-lobed. Capsule depressed ovoid. Seeds brown, glossy, oblong.

Phenology

Flowering from July to September, fruiting from August to October.

Distribution

China, Myanmar and India.

Habitats

Under shrubs, grassy rocks, ledges and slopes at an elevation of 3000–3900 m.

Additional specimens examined

China. Yunnan, Gongshan County: • 3252 m alt., 21 August 2024, Y.M. Shu et. al. s1166 (SITC); • 3336 m, 21 August 2024, Y.M. Shu et. al. s1168 (SITC); • 3399 m alt., 21 August 2024, Y.M. Shu et. al. s1170 (SITC); 30 July 2013, X.H. Jin et al. st1518 (PE01979311!); • 3600 m alt., 29 July 2013, X.H. Jin et al. st1357 (PE!); • 3300 m alt., 22 July 2013, X.H. Jin et al. ST0741 (PE!); 2 September 2011, S.X. Yu et al. 6521 (PE!); 24 August 2009, WWZ 126 (KUN!); • 3250 m alt., 19 September 2003, J.H. Chen 3051 (KUN!); • 3600 m, 19 September 2003, J.H. Chen 3053 (KUN!); 19 August 2003, J.M. Lu et al. 2319 (KUN!); • 3080 m alt., 2 October 2002, Gaoligong Shan Biodiversity Survey16895 (CAS0321223!); • 3400 m alt., 9 September 1940, K.M. Feng 7619 (PE00866103!, KUN0437239!, KUN0437240!); • 3300 m alt., 20 August 1937, T.T. Yu 22447 (PE01982464!, PE01982465!, PE00866102!); • 3100 m alt., 1 October 1935, Q.W. Wang 67226 (PE00866104!); Fugong County: • 3700 m alt., 16 August 2005, H. Li et al. 28515 (CAS0321224!); • 20 August 2003, 2800 m alt., J.M. Lu et L.M. Gao 2327 (KUN!); Lushui County: • 3050 m alt., 08 August 2011, X.H. Jin et al. 11171 (PE02025103!).

Myanmar. • 3600 m, 30 August 1919, F. Kingdon Ward. 3599 (E00275515 photo!).

Conservation status

The conservation status of both P. farreri and P. yui have not been evaluated before. At present, P. farreri has been reported from China, Myanmar and India. Based on our field investigations, numerous individuals could be easily discovered under shrubs, in grassy slopes or on ledges, indicating the population survives and regenerates well. Thus, we propose to list P. farreri as Least Concern (LC) according to the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria (IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee 2022).

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Scientific Research Foundation of China West Normal University (Grant no. 416876).

Author contributions

All authors have contributed equally.

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  • APG IV (2016) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 181(1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12385
  • Ball PW (2016) Celastraceae, Parnassia. In: Ma JS, Ball PW, Levin GA (Eds) Flora of North America vol. 12. Oxford University Press, New York & Oxford, 113–117.
  • Dai XS, Min DZ, Yang B, Wu D, Li B (2021) Taxonomic note of Parnassia (Celastraceae) in China II: Population surveys reveal that P. guilinensis is conspecific to P. xinganensis. PhytoKeys 172: 67–73. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.172.62749
  • Evans WE (1921) Diagnoses specierum novarum in herbario Horti Regii Botanici Edinburgensis cognitarum. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 13(63–64): 172–175.
  • Jien ZP (1963) Some new plants of Chinese Parnassia. Acta Phytotaxonomia Sinica 8(3): 253–260.
  • Ku TC (1987) A revision of the genus Parnassia (Saxifragaceae) in China. Bulletin of Botanical Research 7(1): 1–61.
  • Ku TC, Hultgård UM (2001) Parnassia. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH (Eds) Flora of China, vol. 8. Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, and Science Press, Beijing, China, 95–118.
  • Pankaj B, Das AK, Magnus L (2018) Notes on the alpine flora of Arunachal Pradesh, including several species new to India. In: Das AP, Bera S (Eds) Plant Diversity in the Himalaya Hotspot Region. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra Dun, 163–194.
  • Phillips RB (1982) Systematics of Parnassia (Parnassiaceae): Generic overview and revision of North American taxa. PhD Thesis, University of California, Berkerley, USA.
  • Thiers BM (2024) Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. https://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/ [October 24, 2024]
  • Wu D (2005) Phylogeny and biogeography of the genus Parnassia. PhD Thesis. Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science, Kunming.
  • Wu ZY, Peng H, Li DZ, Zhou ZK, Sun H (2003) Parnassiaceae. In: Wu ZY, Chen XQ (Eds) Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae 1. Science Press, Beijing, 364–367.
  • Zhang YJ, Zhang J, Liu ZY, Ren MX (2019) Parnassia zhengyuana sp. nov. and P. simianshanensis sp. nov.: Two new species of Parnassia (Celastraceae) from karst caves and Danxia landform in southwest China. Nordic Journal of Botany 37(10): e02414. https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.02414
login to comment