Research Article |
Corresponding author: Isabel M. Van Waveren ( isabel.vanwaveren@naturalis.nl ) Academic editor: Dennis Stevenson
© 2017 Jorik Van der Pas, Linda Poppe, Isabel M. Van Waveren.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Van Der Pas J, Poppe L, Van Waveren IM (2017) Ontogenetic variability in old and new collections of Dicranophyllum gallicum Grand'Eury from the late Palaeozoic of Europe. PhytoKeys 88: 123-149. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.88.14042
|
Dicranophyllum gallicum Grand’Eury is described by means of a morphometric analysis of eighty two samples from various old and new localities in western and central Europe. Stem, leaf cushions, leaf scars, leaves, axillary structures and potential seeds are described in detail, and discussed in comparison to earlier studies. The encountered variability in size and structure is shown to be higher than what was described earlier. The organisation of the leaf cushion and scar density vary gradually with the stem width, while stratigraphic position and ecology do not relate to it. It is concluded that the described variability represents an ontogenetic feature rather than a phylogenetic or ecologic one. The juvenile plants are characterised by small stems, a high leaf scar density and elongated leaf cushions with a dominant apical field, while mature specimens are characterized by a wide stem, a relatively low leaf scar density and relatively wide leaf cushions with a pronounced basal field. Axillary shoots and potential seeds of D. gallicum are described and illustrated in detail for the first time. A reconstruction based on the studied material is presented.
Dicranophyllales , Early conifers, Carboniferous, Permian
Dicranophyllum gallicum
Given the divergent set of properties and the paucity of fertile specimens, taxonomic placement is difficult. Indeed, the genus is presented as a ginkgophyte in
The present contribution provides a detailed description of Dicranophyllum gallicum specimens from French, German and new Czech collections. Potential fertile organs are documented in detail for the first time and strong variability within the species is shown to relate to the plants ontogeny rather than its phylogeny or ecology.
A total of 82 samples holding Dicranophyllum gallicum are described in this study (Suppl. material
Locality | Country | Stratigraphic unit | Lithology | Age |
Kladno | Czech Republic | Radnice Member | tuff | Westphalian C ( |
Lubná, Filip II quarry | Czech Republic | Radnice Member | tuff | Westphalian C ( |
Zwickau | Germany | Zwickau Formation | volcanics | Westphalian D-Cantabrian ( |
Ronchamp | France | ? | coaly mudstone, black coal | Stephanian ( |
Mont-Pelé | France | ? Mont-Pelé Formation | tuff | Stephanian ( |
Saint-Etienne | France | ? Assise des couches de St Etienne | shale | Stephanian ( |
Knoviz | Czech Republic | ? Hredle Member | shale | Stephanian ( |
Commentry | France | ? | shale | Late Stephanian ( |
Sperbersbach | Germany | Goldlauter Formation | tuff | Asselian ( |
Kammerberg | Germany | Manebach Formation | grey facies of fluvial deposits | Asselian ( |
Oelsnitz | Germany | Hartensdorf Formation | ? | Asselian ( |
Oberhof | Germany | Oberhof Formation | red and grey facies with up to 90 % of volcanics | Asselian/Sakmarian ( |
Winnweiler | Germany | Donnersberg Formation | tuff | Sakmarian/Artinskian ( |
Rotterode | Germany | Rotterode Formation | ? | Sakmarian/Artinskian ( |
Thirty-eight specimens from the Museum d'Histoire Naturelle Jacques de la Comble in Autun, France, were borrowed by Naturalis Biodiversity Center in Leiden, the Netherlands, and detailed measurements of these fossils were carried out by use of a Zeiss SteREO Discovery.V20 microscope with a Zeiss AxioCam MRc 5 for photography, and the associated program AxioVision. The other collections were visited by the authors. Measuring was performed using the means available at each collection. Where digital measuring equipment was not available measurements were carried out by hand (i.e., with a binocular microscope and protractors). Photographs were made using a Lumix Panasonic DMC FZ 18 camera. Pictures of the fossils in the Prague collection were taken using the equipment available at the Paleontology department; measurements on these pictures were carried out in Leiden using AxioVision.
Measured characters for the stem (Suppl. material
Properties from the axis were recorded for 85 samples, properties from the leaves were recorded for 96 samples, and 19 axillary shoots and 15 seeds were measured.
Stems are slender with a helical leaf arrangement. They are always fragmentary, but the longest fragment is 360 mm. The leaves are inserted at a perpendicular angle or even at a downward angle, after which the leaf departs at an acute angle thus commonly forming a pouch (Fig.
The 85 measurements of the stem width indicate a diameter of 2 to 36 mm (mean 11 mm). Samples from the Mont Pelé are the smallest (on average 10 mm), while samples from Lubná, Oelsnitz and Ronchamp have on average wider stems (mean respectively 13, 16 and 17 mm).
Leaf cushion length varies between 3 and 22 mm (mean 7 mm). Samples from Oelsnitz, Ronchamp and Lubná display longer leaf cushions (mean respectively 8, 9 and 12 mm). Leaf cushions are between 1.3 and 6.7 times longer than wide (mean 3.5, indicating an average width of 2 mm). The Oelsnitz samples have relatively broad leaf cushions (on average only 2.3 × longer than wide).
The scar position in the present data determines the length of the basal and apical leaf cushion field (Fig.
Diagram of the relative dominance of the basal over the apical leaf cushion field. Legend: Horizontal axis: Length apical leaf cushion field/ total length leaf cushion, vertical axis length basal leaf cushion field/ total length leaf cushion. Pink square: Lubná red cross: Mt Pelé, light green diamond: Ronchamp, dark green cross: Oelsnitz, dark blue star: St Etienne, purper circle: Kladno.
Leaf scars are broader than height. The leaf scar is apically rhombic acute, basally rhombic obtuse, with a height of 1-3 (mean 1.5) mm and a width of 1–3.5 (mean 2) mm.
The average leaf scar density varies strongly between 1 and 34/cm2 (mean 9/cm2). Scar density in the Mont Pelé material is highest (10/cm2), and is lower for the Lubná, Ronchamp and Oelsnitz samples (mean respectively 3, 3 and 7/cm 2). Furthermore, as can be inferred from the scar density plotted against stem width, these properties are correlated (Fig.
The angle of bifurcation in leaf specimens ranged from 2 to 41 degrees for the first bifurcation, and 18 to 68 degrees for the second. The second angle is generally larger than the first (Fig.
Leaf structures: A Leaf displaying two consecutive bifurcation angles, the second angle is larger than the first, sample 30, Ronchamp B Stomatal furrows as pronounced protrusions on the adaxial side of the leaf surface, note several thin striae between the furrows, sample 220 Mt Pelé C Stomatal furrows as pronounced depressions on the abaxial side of the leaf surface, note the midvein depression, sample 225 Mt Pelé D Venation in a Dicranophyllum gallicum leaf, note the trajectory of the midvein from the inner edge of the second leaf segment, gradually back to the centre position before the second bifurcation, sample 157, Mt Pelé.
As most leaves were incomplete, only the length of the middle segment could be measured. The length of the middle leaf segment varied between 1.4 and 87.0 mm (mean 18.2). The Mont Pelé samples had the smallest middle segment (mean of 8.4 mm), while Ronchamp, Lubná and Sperberbach second leaf fragments were larger (mean respectively 15.7, 19.7 and 19.9 mm).
The width of all three leaf fragments could be measured varying between 1.0 and 4.6 mm (mean 2.3 mm). While the width of the first non-bifurcated segment of Mt Pelé samples was relatively small (mean 1.9 mm), those of Ronchamp, Lubná and Sperberbach was relatively large (mean respectively 2.1, 2.9 and 2.9 mm). The width of the second segment varied between 0.6 and 2.5 mm (mean 1.4 mm) while, again, the width of the second segment of Mt Pelé samples was relatively small (mean 1 mm), and that of Ronchamp, Sperberbach and Lubná samples was relatively large (mean respectively 1.3, 1.8 and 2.0 mm). Finally the same was the case for the width of the third segment that varied between 0 and 2.1 mm (mean 0.5 mm). While the width of the third segment of the Mt Pelé samples was smallest (mean 0.2 mm), that of Ronchamp, Sperberbach and Lubná samples was relatively large (mean respectively 0.5, 0.9 and 1.4 mm).
Two rather distinct cuticular patterns on D. gallicum leaves can be observed on the different sides of the leaf. In a few specimens, two furrows were very clearly pronounced as protrusions on the impressed surface and no midvein was apparent (Fig.
Based on present observations of the adaxial and abaxial sides of the leaves of D. gallicum (Fig.
Diagram of leaf structure: A Reconstruction of the adaxial leaf side of Dicranophyllum gallicum, note the path of the midvein in the second segment of the leaf B Reconstruction of the abaxial leaf side of Dicranophyllum gallicum, note the prominent furrows and the absence of a clear midvein.
On some compression fossils marginal microdenticulation is preserved (Fig.
Reconstructing the attachment of leaves to the stem is difficult, as these two organs are commonly found separated from each other. Several specimens of D. gallicum do show a stem fragment with remnants of attached leaves, in which the leaf follows a specific curve as it escapes from the stem. There is little information on how this trajectory appears on leaf remains, as most leaves with clear venation are broken off and left their basal portion behind. An exception was found on specimen 1529 of Mt Pelé (Fig.
Well-preserved axillary shoots were found in the collections of the Museum of Natural History in Prague. Various shoots are attached to the stem of Dicranophyllum gallicum specimens from the Lubná locality (Fig.
Axillary shoots: A Axillary shoot with apical widening (indicated by arrow), E 06946, Lubná B Axillary shoot with subtending leaf (indicated by arrow), sample E 06946, Lubná C Axillary shoot without broad apical widening, sample E 06950, Lubná D Cross section of axillary shoot, sample E 06946, Lubná.
A total of 15 seeds was observed on the specimens in our study (Supplementary File 5). They were found dispersed on specimens from the Mont-Pelé locality, with one exception from the Ronchamp locality (specimen 1362). Seeds have a conical to ovate shape, 2.6-3.8 mm long (mean 3.4 mm) and 2.8-3.8 mm wide (mean 3.1 mm), usually longer than wide. A nucellus can often be observed and is 1.0-1.5 mm long (mean 1.2 mm) and 0.7-1.2 mm wide (mean 1.0 mm). The seed base is rounded, the chalaza part is flattened to notched or cordate (Fig.
The stem diameter recorded in the literature hovers around the mean values of 11 mm recorded here such as 9.0 mm for D. gallicum var. parchemineyi (Renault and Zeiller 1888), 10 mm for the German D. gallicum described by
Leaves were found attached to stems of various sizes, implying that the plant had leaves covering most of the stem. Nonetheless, stem 221 in our study material shows a transition from large, well-developed leaf cushions to small, poorly defined leaf cushions. This transition gives an indication that the more apical part of these stems was still developing, while the more basal part was mature. Periodic growth patterns have not been observed on any stems, not even on the longest stem fragments of D. gallicum. This suggests that stem growth in D. gallicum never halted, that is, it was more or less continuous.
Many stem fragments are gently curved. Although we have not analysed this character in detail, it makes sense to expect that thicker stems are more resistant to bending, while slender stems are more flexible (also being younger). The majority of stems in the Dicranophyllum gallicum material is slender and curved to some extent, indicating that during its life the plant was probably flexible.
Leaf cushion length and width from literature, respectively 4-7 mm and 2-3 mm (
The dominant leaf cushion organisation with a large apical field is in contrast with the leaf cushion organisation given in
As only the Lubná and the two Ronchamp samples have a well-developed basal leaf cushion field, these specimens are best comparable to the figured paratype of
Earlier Dicranophyllum gallicum descriptions indicate that the total leaf length varied between 33 and 60 mm, with on average 15-20 mm for the first segment, 10-15 mm for the second and 8 to 10 mm for the third (
The leaf width from earlier studies varied between 1.5 and 2.0 mm (
Dicranophyllum gallicum found in the Erzgebirge has small abaxial stomatal furrows of 0.2 to 0.25 mm wide. The furrow width in the present material was slightly larger (0.35 mm). Thin striae as found here between the two furrows have also been described earlier as five strong lineations in D. gallicum samples from the Goldlauterer Schichten (
The trajectory of the midvein presented above (Figs
Based on present material it is difficult to conceive such a leaf development, as no clear simple leaves on any D. gallicum specimen was observed. Incomplete leaves without bifurcations were observed, these could be associated to D. gallicum based on venation properties, that is, the clear presence of furrows, but it was not possible to make statements about whether those leaves bifurcate or are, indeed, simple leaves. A few leaves do display a size and shape that suggests an early stage of development (Fig.
Dicranophyllum hallei also displays axillary shoots and
Seeds were already mentioned by
Obviously, finding and describing the original material of Dicranophyllum gallicum Renault & Zeiller, 1888, would give unequivocal proof of the nature and organisation of the female fertile structures, but, in spite of a specific search for it, this sample cannot be located. Here we only have the interrupted organic bridge between the leaf base and the seed (Fig.
As seen in the results, the Mt Pelé samples are relatively small in leaf and stem size, have a normal leaf cushion length, have the highest leaf scar density and have a dominance of the apical over the basal leaf cushion field. The Lubná, Ronchamp and Oelsnitz samples, in contrast, relatively have a large stem and a short leaf cushion with a large basal leaf field and low scar density.
Such differences in features could indicate a phylogenetic differentiation, where the large Lubná samples are ancestral to smaller Dicranophyllum gallicum specimens, Lubná is amongst the oldest (from the Westphalian C, Table
For the reconstruction of the habit of Dicranophyllum gallicum using
In spite of
Maximum width (m) | Result (m) | Wood type | Niklas' formulas |
---|---|---|---|
4.49 | woody | 10^(1.59+0.39 (Log 10) (Stem width))-0.18 (Log 10) (Stem width)^2) | |
0.036 | 3.37 | nonwoody | 10^(2.51+1.41 (Log 10) (Stem width))-0.03 (Log 10) (Stem width)^2) |
3.37 | intermediate | 10^(1.81+0.7 (Log 10) (Stem width))-0.13 (Log 10) (Stem width)^2) | |
Average width (m) | |||
1.38 | woody | 10^(1.59+0.39 (Log 10) (Stem width))-0.18 (Log 10) (Stem width)^2) | |
0.0111 | 0.73 | nonwoody | 10^(2.51+1.41 (Log 10) (Stem width))-0.03 (Log 10) (Stem width)^2) |
0.88 | intermediate | 10^(1.81+0.7 (Log 10) (Stem width))-0.13 (Log 10) (Stem width)^2) |
This expected height could increase if D. gallicum were shown to have branched. Grand’Eury showed a single specimen with a branching stem fragment (
Finding similarities between the pollination and fertilization process, and the presence of the retained motile sperms in Ginkgo and the Cycadales,
Marginal microdenticulation
Marginal microdenticulation (Fig.
Stomatal furrow
Although it was not possible with the present material to perform a cuticular analysis on the leaves of Dicranophyllum gallicum,
Other plant fossils found co-occurring on the Dicranophyllum gallicum samples
Information about associated plant species occurring beside Dicranophyllum gallicum mainly comes from the tuffaceous material of the Mont-Pelé locality. The specimens from this locality had fragments of Calamites, Pecopteris, Nemejcopteris, Alethopteris, Neuropteris, Sphenopteris, Cordaites, and the seeds Pachytesta and Samaropsis associated with them. Also, on specimen E 06948 from the Lubná locality, a megasporangium of an Omphalophloios sp. was found. These genera are predominately known from the late Pennsylvanian tropical forests of Euramerica and, as Dicranophyllum gallicum was maximally 4.5 m high, it is suggested here that the plant stood in the shade of its taller associates. Omphalophloios feistmantelii is also 2-3 m in height and has been interpreted as a plant able to rapidly colonize local habitats, preferring peat and mixed peat-clastic swamps (
Sediment
Dicranophyllum gallicum is as often preserved in tuffs as in shales (Table
It appears that the variability of Dicranophyllum gallicum in stem size, leaf cushion organisation, leaf size and bifurcation angle is much wider than what was presented in earlier studies. The variability in leaf cushion organisation with either the dominance of the apical or the basal leaf cushion field is newly described herein. Dominant apical leaf cushion fields are generally found on specimens with small stems, relatively long leaf cushions and a relatively high leaf scar density, while well-developed basal leaf cushion fields commonly occur on specimens with a broad stem, relatively wide leaf cushions and relatively low scar density. As scar density and stem width are gradually and negatively correlated, while the two stem types have the same stratigraphic occurrence, but divergent lithologies, the variability they represent is considered to point towards ontogenetic rather than phylogenetic or ecologic variability. The smaller stems with higher scar density and elongated leaf scar with a dominant apical field are considered juvenile while the larger stems with lower scar density, relatively broad leaf scars with well-developed basal field are considered mature specimens. The newly described Lubná samples chiefly represent mature specimens.
We are very grateful to Dr. Dominique Chabard of the Museum d'Histoire Naturelle Jacques de la Comble, Autun, for allowing us to borrow a large number of samples from the museum collection. We are grateful to Dr. Ralf Werneburg and colleagues for guiding us through the extensive collection at the Naturhistorisches Museum Schloss Bertholdsburg, Schleusingen, and to Dr. Stephan Schultka and associates of the Naturkundemuseum Berlin for granting us access into their collections, especially for letting us borrow a few samples for a more detailed research. We also thank the experts at the National Museum in Prague, Dr. Jiri Kvaček and Dr Milan Libertín, and, in particular, for their hospitality and their help in finding the right specimens in the Prague collections, for providing numbers to these samples and for allowing us to work with the digital equipment available at the Paleontology department. We further thank Dr. Zbyněk Šimůnek of the Czech Geological Survey in Prague, for the specimen he made available for us to measure. We thank Dr Romain Thomas for making the Dicranophyllum gallicum samples from the collection at the Museum d'Histoire Naturelles in Paris available to us. We are also grateful to Prof. Dr J van Konijnenburg-van Cittert (Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden) for measuring specimens in the collection of the Paläontologisches Museum in Munich, where we were not able to go ourselves. Prof. Stephen K. Donovan (Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden) is thanked for his incisive review of an earlier version of this paper. This paper was improved in the light of constructive comments provided by the review of Dr. G. Rothwell.
List of samples holding the Dicranophyllum gallicum specimen considered in present analysis.
Data type: Microsoft Excel Worksheet (.xlsx)
Explanation note: List of samples holding the Dicranophyllum gallicum specimen considered in present analysis. The samples are listed by collection, specimen number and locality.
Measurements on Dicranophyllum gallicum stem.
Data type: Microsoft Excel Worksheet (.xlsx)
Explanation note: Measurements on Dicranophyllum gallicum stem: stem width, leaf scar length and width, leaf cushion length and width and apical and basal leaf cushion length in mm and leaf scar density in number per cm2.
Measurements of Dicranophyllum gallicum leaves.
Data type: Microsoft Excel Worksheet (.xlsx)
Explanation note: Measurements of Dicranophyllum gallicum leaves: length second segment, width first, second and third segment in mm.
Measurements of Dicranophyllum gallicum axillary shoots.
Data type: Microsoft Excel Worksheet (.xlsx)
Explanation note: Measurements of Dicranophyllum gallicum axillary shoots: maximal length, maximal width, apex width in mm.
Measurements of seeds co-occurring with Dicranophyllum gallicum.
Data type: Microsoft Excel Worksheet (.xlsx)
Explanation note: Measurements of co-occurring seeds: seeds length and width and nucellus length and width in mm.