(C) 2010 Gloria E. Barboza. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
For reference, use of the paginated PDF or printed version of this article is recommended.
Considerable confusion exists within Capsicum (Solanaceae) regarding the status and typification of several names, in part due to misidentifications. Some types were destroyed in Berlin during the Second World War, some have not been found by modern systematics, while others exhibit uncertain locality data or contain material from more than one species. Fourteen lectotypes, synonyms, and a new name, Capsicum eshbaughii Barboza nom. nov., are proposed here.
Capsicum, nomenclature, taxonomy, typification, “ulupicas”
Capsicum L. (Solanaceae) comprises approximately 32 species, including five species (Capsicum annuum L., Capsicum frutescens L., Capsicum chinense Jacq., Capsicum baccatum L., and Capsicum pubescens Ruiz & Pav.) known for their pungent fruits under the common names “chile”, “ají”, “paprika”, “chili”, “chilli pepper”, “tabasco”, “habanero”, pimenta-de-cheiro”, “rocoto”, etc. and the non-pungent Capsicum annuum cultivars known as “sweet bell pepper” and “pimiento”.
This genus has been known since the beginning of
civilizations in the Western Hemisphere and has been part of the human
diet since 6000–7500 BC (
There is currently no consensus classification of Capsicum itself. The infrageneric taxa proposed by
Working towards a complete treatment of wild Capsicum species I became aware of several instances of confusion regarding erroneous or uncertain names. In addition, some type specimens have not been found or have been destroyed in Berlin during the Second World War while others exhibit uncertain locality data or are composed of material from more than one species.
In this paper, lectotypes are designated for 14 names, and these are synonymized under their accepted names in Capsicum. In addition, a new name in Capsicum is proposed. In each case below, the locality information given for the lectotype corresponds with the information found on the specimen itself.
LectotypificationsAcnistus geminifolius
Damm., Bot. Jahrb. 36(4): 384. 1905. Type citation: [ECUADOR].
“Crescit in declivibus montis Carazou pr. Miligally (S[odiro]. n. 114/82
– Mai 1882); in silvis subandinis et subtropicis pr. Couzauho
(S[odiro]. n. 114/81 – Mai 1882; in silvis m. Carazou (S[odiro]. n.
114/84)”.- Lectotype (designated here): [ECUADOR. Pichincha]. “In silv.
Monte Corazón, Sep 1873, Sodiro 114/84” – P! (P00410128) = Capsicum geminifolium (Damm.) Hunz. (
The original collections of Sodiro are thought to be deposited at QPLS and Q, both in Ecuador. No syntype collections of Acnistus geminifolium I found in these or in B, G, MO, NY, SI, or US. A photograph of the destroyed specimen at B of Sodiro 114/82 exists at F (Field Museum Negative #2487). The only collection found, Sodiro 114/84, is housed at P and is here chosen as lectotype.
Brachistus coccineus Rusby, Bull. New York Bot. Gard. 8(28): 117. 1912 ≡ Lycianthes coccinea
(Rusby) Rusby, Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 53: 210. 1926. Type citation.
[BOLIVIA]. “Six feet high; San Buena Ventura, 1400 ft., Nov. 30, 1901
([Williams] Nos. 623 and 634)”.- Lectotype (designated here): [BOLIVIA.
Dpto. La Paz, Prov. A. Iturralde]. “San Buena Ventura, 1400 ft, 8
Nov 1901, R.S.Williams 634”.- NY! (NY00138552); isolectotypes: BM!
(BM0000884131), K! = Capsicum coccineum (Rusby) Hunz. (
Williams 634 at NY is the best and the most complete of
the two cited Williams collections, with flower buds, flowers and
mature fruits; it is selected here as lectotype. The second collection
(Williams 623: BM!, K!, NY!, US!) is predominantly in fruit. After
describing Brachistus coccineus,
Brachistus hookerianus
Miers, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 2, 3 (16): 268. 1849. Type
citation: “Ecuador, v. s. in herb. Hook. (Cerro de Lantana, Guayaquil,
Jameson, et in horto Kewensis cultus)”. – Lectotype (designated
here): [ECUADOR]. “Guayaquil, Cerro of Lantana, Jan 1846, W.Jameson
s.n.” – K! (K000585919); isolectotype: US! photo + fragm. = Capsicum hookerianum (Miers) Kuntze (
Analysis of the original material suggests that
Brachistus pubescens Stewart, Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci., ser. 4, 1: 137. 1911 ≡ Capsicum galapagense
Heiser & P.G.Sm., Brittonia 10: 200. 1958. Type citation.
[ECUADOR]. “Albemarle Isl.: Villamil, bushes in woodland, 450–600 ft.
([Stewart] nos. 3351–3352). James Isl.: James Bay, occasional bushes
above 1600 ft. ([Stewart] nº. 3353)”.- Lectotype (designated here):
[ECUADOR. Galapagos: Isla Isabela]. “Albemarle Island, Villamil,
450–600 ft., bushes in woodland, 3 Jan 1906, A.Stewart 3352”. CAS!;
isolectotypes: GH!, US! = Capsicum galapagoense Hunz. (
The transfer of Brachistus pubescens to Capsicum necessitates a new epithet due to the earlier publication of Capsicum pubescens Ruiz & Pav. (
Capsicum campylopodium forma magis-puberula Chodat, Bull. Herb. Boissier ser. 2, 2: 815. 1902, syn. nov.Type citation. [PARAGUAY]. “In silvis pr. Sapucay, Dec., [Hassler]1607; in silva Ipé-hu, Sierra Maracayu, Oct., [Hassler] 5134”.- Lectotype (designated here): [PARAGUAY]. “In altoplanitie et decliviis “Serra de Maracayú”, in silva Ipé-hu, Oct., Hassler 5134. Frutex 1–2, petala alba”- G!; isolectotypes: A!, K!, P! (P00410080, P00410081), S!, UC! (UC-944853), W! = Capsicum flexuosum Sendtn.
Capsicum hispidum Dunal var. glabriusculum
Dunal, Prodr. 13(1): 420. 1852. Type citation. “In Mexico circa Bejar
(Berland[ier] n. 1863, in h. Moric.); circa Tampica de Tamaulipas.
(Berl[andier], n. 95, in herb. Moric.)”.- Lectotype (designated here):
[UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Texas, Bexar Co. San Antonio]. “Bejar,
Sep 1828, Berlandier n. 1863” P! (P00410138); isolectotypes: BM!
(BM000775839), F!, G!, NY! (NY00138591), P! (P00409852) = Capsicum annuum var. glabriusculum (Dunal) Heiser & Pickersgill (
Among the original material cited by
Capsicum microcarpum DC. var. tomentosum
Chodat & Hassl., Bull. Herb. Boissier 2, 4:80.1903. Type citation.
[PARAGUAY]. “In dumetis collis Cerro hu, pr. Paraguary, Dec.,
[Hassler] n. 6498, in rupestribus pr. Cerro pyta, Febr., [Hassler] n.
1926”.- Lectotype (designated here): [PARAGUAY]. “Prope Paraguarí, in
dumetis collis Cerro Hu, Dec 1900, E.Hassler 6498. Suffrutex 1–1.5
petala albovirentia interne avellanes punctata” – G!; isolectotypes: BM!
(BM000087632a), K! (K000585894), P! (P00410166), MO!, S!, UC!, W!
= Capsicum baccatum L. var.baccatum (
Capsicum microcarpum DC. var. glabrescens Hassl., Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 15: 244. 1918. syn. nov. Type citation. [PARAGUAY]. “Hassler 215, 5703, 6070, 12385”.- Lectotype (designated here) [PARAGUAY]. “Iter ad Yerbales montium Sierra de Maracayu, in regione cursus superioris fluminis Jejui guazú, Dec., Hassler 5703”- G!; isolectotypes: BM!, GH!, K! (K000585896), MO! (MO503802), NY! (NY00138600), P! (P00410160, P00410161, P00482076), UC!, W! = Capsicum baccatum L. var. baccatum
The four syntypes of Capsicum microcarpum var. glabrescens have been examined. All of them are good quality complete collections preserved in many herbaria (Hassler 215: G!, K!; Hassler 6070: G!, GH!, K!, MO!, NY!, P!, W!, UC!, US!; Hassler 12385: G!, GH!, K!, L!, MO!, NY! two sheets, UC!, US!, Z!). The sheet of Hassler 5703 at G is the most complete and is designated here as lectotype. As stated above under Capsicum microcarpum var. tomentosum, both the tomentose and glabrescent populations of Capsicum microcarpum correspond to the entity recognized as Capsicum baccatum var. baccatum.
Capsicum microphyllum Dunal, Prodr. 13(1): 421. 1852, syn. nov. Type citation. “In Habanâ (de la Sagra in h. DC.), in Texas, circa Rio de Medina prope Bejar (Berland[ier] 1907, in h. Moric.)”.- Lectotype (designated here): [UNITED STATES]. “Texas, à Rio de Medina, Berlandier 1907” , G!; isolectotypes: BM! (BM000775841), GH!, MO!, NY! (NY00138590), P! (P00409956, P00409851) = Capsicum annuum var. glabriusculum (Dunal) Heiser & Pickersgill
Both syntypes are good quality specimens in agreement with the diagnosis. Berlandier 1907 at G is selected as the lectotype as its duplicates are broadly distributed. De la Sagra’s specimen (nº 3, [año]1888) appears to be preserved only at G-DC! Berlandier´s collections held at G!, GH! (date on label: Oct. 1828), NY!, and P! are mainly in fruit whereas the ones at BM! and MO! also have flower buds or flowers. The calyx shape and the fruit colour and shape are among the characters most useful for establishing the correct placement of this name.Thus, the small, cup-shaped and sub-dentate calyx and the globose-ovate red berry together with the presence of the solitary pedicels and white corolla (in sched. “corolla albida”) clearly observed in these specimens are good matches for Capsicum annuum var. glabriusculum. The small size of the leaves is within the range of variation of this wild variety.
Solanum mendax Van Heurck & Müll. Arg., Observ. Bot. 61. 1870 ≡ Capsicum mendax
(Van Heurck & Müll. Arg.) J.F.Macbr., Candollea 5: 402. 1934. Type
citation. “In Andibus Peruviae ecuadorensis (R.Spruce n. 5117! in hb.
van Heurck et n. 5050! in hb. DC)”. Lectotype (designated here):
[ECUADOR]. “Baños, in sepibus, muris delapsis Aug 1857, Spruce 5050.
Frutex valde ramosus; 8-pedalis. Flores flavi. Baccae nigrae” – K!
(K000201915); isolectotypes: BM! (BM000777290), C!, G!, GH!, K!
(K000201792), MO! (MO1287475, MO1287476), OXF!, P! (P00410209), W!,
fragment at CORD! = Capsicum rhomboideum (Dunal) Kuntze (
Both syntypes cited in the original description are from
the Andes of Ecuador. The specimen Spruce 5117 is deposited at K
(K000201905!, K000201904!) and BM (BM000072741!) and apparently also at
AWH. A note on sheet K000201904, states “Although Van Heurck quotes
this number it does not agree with his description which answers to 5050
and is a Brachistus. N.E. Brown”. According to
Capsicum campylopodium Sendtn., Fl. Bras. 10(6): 144. 1846. Type citation: [BRAZIL]. “In Serra d’Estrella, prov. Rio de Janeiro: Schott; in Brasilia australiore: Sellow”.- Lectotype (designated here): “Brasilia, Sellow 6”- P! (P00410022); isolectotypes: BM!, CORD!: fragment, K! (K000585891, right plant), F!: B photo n° 2865 + fragment.
Both syntypes were successfully located. Duplicates of
Schott 5409 are housed at F!, GH!, and W!, and all of them are plants
in flower. The Sellow collection has been distributed more widely; a
photograph and a fragment (with fruit and seeds) of the Berlin specimen
(“B 1543”) destroyed during World War II are held at F; the P sheet of
Sellow includes flowering and fruiting material and has an original
handwritten label assigning the number 6 to this collection. Of the two
syntypes, the Sellow specimen at P is selected as lectotype since it is
a complete one and it is possible to distinguish the most distinctive
characters of Capsicum campylopodium (toothless calyx, geniculate pedicels at anthesis, and black seeds with spine-like projections) (
Capsicum eximium Hunz., Darwiniana 9(2): 235. 1950. Type citation. “Argentina. Salta. Quebrada de San Antonio, Pampa Grande, 1600 m, Dpto. Guachipas, leg. Armando T. Hunziker nº 1907, 6 May 1942. Ejemplar fructificado. (ATH[unziker]).- Semillas del ejemplar nº 1907 cultivadas en el Jardín Botánico de la Facultad de Agronomía y Veterinaria de Buenos Aires, leg. Armando T. Hunziker 7346, 4 Mar 1943. Ejemplares floríferos (ATH[unziker])”.- Lectotype (designated here): “ARGENTINA: Semillas del ejemplar nº 1907 cultivadas en el Jardín Botánico de la Facultad de Agronomía y Veterinaria de Buenos Aires, A.T. Hunziker 7346, 4 Mar 1943” – CORD!; isolectotype: CORD!.
Hunziker cited two syntypes. The first collection
(Hunziker 1907), is abundant consisting of 18 fruiting specimens held
at CORD. The second one (Hunziker 7346) is here designated as lectotype;
it originates from plants cultivated from seeds of the original
collection and consists of two flowering branches on a single sheet. A
duplicate of this latter collection is a small specimen also in flower.
Fruiting specimens of Capsicum are not only difficult to distinguish from other species of Capsicum but sometimes also from some species of Lycianthes
as both genera share the similar calyx features. The flowering
collection is designated here as lectotype since the corolla is the best
organ with which to characterize Capsicum eximium (
Capsicum mirabile Sendtn., Fl. Bras. 10(6): 143. 1846. Type citation: [BRAZIL]. “In sylvis fere ubique per prov. Sebastianopolitana et Paulinam, Decembri florens: Martius, Karwinski; in irriguis lapidosis in Serra de S. Geraldo, prov. Minarum, Aprili florens: Martius”.- Lectotype (designated here): [BRAZIL]: “In sylvis fere ubique per prov. Sebastianopol. et Paulinam, Dec., Martius s.n.”- M!
The three syntypes were examined. Even though the second syntype, deposited at BR! ([Brazil] “Prope Rio de Janeiro, L.B. de Karwinski s.n., 1823”), matches the protologue, the Martius specimen at M is chosen here as the lectotype as it is more complete and better preserved. Both specimens show the characteristic features of Capsicum mirabile such as the narrowly elliptic and glabrous leaves (young leaves with scarce short hairs on the margins), geniculate pedicels, glabrous calyx with 5 long teeth, stellate corolla, and black seeds with spine-like projections (Fig. 1). The third syntype (the Martius collection from Serra de S. Geraldo, Minas Gerais [M!, M photo nº 6522 at F!]) is unusually pubescent for this species.
Capsicum mirabile. A flower B flower bud C, H leaf D open corolla E gynoecium F fruit G seed. Line drawing by L. Sánchez; voucher Martius s. n., lectotype.
Capsicum villosum Sendtn. var. muticum Sendtn., Fl. Bras. 10(6): 145. 1846. Type citation: [BRAZIL]. “In Serra d’Estrella ejusdem prov. [prov. Sebastianopolitanae]: Schott; in Brasilia australiore: Sellow”.- Lectotype (designated here): [BRAZIL. Rio de Janeiro]: “Serra d’Estrella, Schott 5416”- W!
One of the two syntypes, the Sellow specimen at B (Sellow 79, in sched.), was destroyed and the only elements remaining of it are F neg. #2874 and an incomplete fragment at F! The other syntype (Schott 5416), here designated as the lectotype, is not a well-preserved specimen but the diagnostic characters of this variety (yellowish and long patent hairs on stem and pedicels, leaves densely pubescent in both surfaces, and angulate calyx with 5 short teeth), can be seen.
A new name for Capsicum eximium var. tomentosumurn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77109529-1
Capsicum eximium var. tomentosum was described as an unusual glandular tomentose variety of Capsicum eximium Hunz. The presence of this kind of pubescence densely covering the vegetative organs, pedicels, and calyx, and of a 5–10 toothed-calyx (Fig. 2 N) in specimens from a restricted area in south-central Bolivia (Dpto. Santa Cruz and Cochabamba) makes them quite different from Capsicum eximium. In fact, Capsicum eximium has non- glandular pubescence (Fig. 3 M), a calyx with only 5 teeth (Fig. 3 C, E), and is distributed in a larger area (Bolivia: La Paz to Tarija and Argentina: Jujuy to Tucumán).
Capsicum eshbaughii. A embryo B, H, F, J, L glandular trichomes C fruit D non-glandular trichome E flowering branch G flower I gynoecium K seed M open corolla N fruiting calyx. Line drawing by P. Peralta; voucher A, C, K, N Nee 36164; B, D-J, L, M Eshbaugh 1943 b.
Capsicum eximium. A, J anthers in ventral and dorsal view respectively B flowering branch C flower D, G transverse section of the seed coat E fruit F embryo H gynoecium I seed K open corolla L seed in cross section M non-glandular trichome. Line drawing by N. Flury; voucher A, C-M: Hunziker 1907; B, Hunziker 7346.
Glandular hairs are rare in Capsicum. The dense indumentum of Capsicum eshbaughii consists of different types of glandular trichomes, some of them observed only in this species. The hair variations are: long simple hairs with multicellular and verrucate stalks and unicellular stipitate (Fig. 2 F) or not stipitate (Fig. 2 B) heads; short hairs with bicellular smooth stalks and multicellular heads (Fig. 2 J); and bifurcate hairs with both branches ending in a unicellular head (Fig. 2 L) or one branch non-glandular and the other longer and glandular (Fig. 2 H).
Capsicum eshbaughii, together with Capsicum eximium and Capsicum cardenasii
Heiser & P.G.Sm., is known as “ulupica” (Eshbaugh 1943 C); their
very pungent fruits are very much appreciated as a spice or as pickles
in the kitchens of Bolivia (
This species is named in honor to Dr. W.H. Eshbaugh (Miami University) who first recognised the distinctness of this species and devoted part of his research to the taxonomy of chili peppers.
Specimens Examined. Bolivia. Cochabamba: José Carrasco Torrico, camino Cochabamba-Comarapa, Copachuncho, ca. 3000 m, 29 Mar 1987, D.Flores 89 (CORD, LPB). Santa Cruz: Florida, El Sauce, west of Samaipata, elev. 1730 m, 30 Mar 1987, W.H.Eshbaugh 1943 C & D (CORD); same locality, 1 Aug 1990, W.H.Eshbaugh 1943 a (CORD); 5 km (by air) SE of Mairana, on road to Samaipata, at “Quebrada Seca”, 18°09'S, 63°56'W, ca. 1550 m, 4 Feb 1988, M.Nee 36164 (CORD).
I am indebted to the curators and staff of A, AWH, B, BM, BR, C, CAS, CORD, F, G, G-DC, GH, IND, K, L, LPB, M, MO, MU, NY, OXF, P, Q, QPLS, S, SI, UC, US, W, and Z herbaria who either loaned material for study, allowed me to examine type collections in their care, provided digital images of type specimens or gave me information about these essential collections; thanks are also due to Dr L. Ariza Espinar, Dr M. Nee, and Dr S. Knapp for critical comments on the draft manuscript, and to the artists for making the illustrations. Financial assistance was provided by Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (PID 6188; PIP 01686), Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 20196), Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología de la Provincia de Córdoba, Secretaría de Ciencia y Tecnología (SECYT-UNC), and Myndel Botanica Foundation.