Research Article
Print
Research Article
Two new species of Ocotea (Lauraceae) with clustered leaves from the Uxpanapa region, Mexico
expand article infoLeopoldo Hurtado-Reveles‡, Andrés Ernesto Ortiz-Rodriguez‡
‡ Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
Open Access

Abstract

Two new species of Ocotea (Lauraceae) from Southern Mexico are described and illustrated. Based on their floral morphology, vegetative indument, and micromorphological attributes, both species are circumscribed within the Ocotea helicterifolia group. Within this clade, the two species are morphologically similar to those with clustered leaves. Both species are endemic to the species-rich yet fragmented forests of the Uxpanapa region in Mexico, and therefore, their populations are threatened. Here, the morphological similarities of both species and their conservation status are discussed.

Key words:

Endemic, floristic refuge, Tehuantepec Isthmus, tropical rainforests, Veracruz

Introduction

Lauraceae, with around 55 genera and ca. 3000 species, is one of the most ecologically important families of woody plants in tropical and subtropical forests (Rohwer 1993; Chanderbali et al. 2001). Members of the Lauraceae family pose taxonomic challenges for botanists due to the small size and complex internal structure of their flowers, the absence of local taxonomic treatments and the difficulty of following the available dichotomous keys (van der Werff 1991; van der Werff and Richter 1996; Rohwer et al. 2009; Liu et al. 2017; Rohde et al. 2017). Consequently, many herbarium specimens are undetermined, incorrectly determined, or without updated nomenclature. Furthermore, the current estimates of Lauraceae diversity in many tropical areas do not consider the latest botanical collections and exploration efforts, leading to an underestimation of its species richness (van der Werff 2020).

The genus Ocotea Aubl. is the most species-rich neotropical Lauraceae genera. It has a very broad concept and has been considered a catch-all genus for taxa that cannot be confidently placed in more clear-cut Lauraceae genera (Rohwer 1991; Lorea-Hernández 2002; van der Werff 2002). Moreover, phylogenetic analyses consistently show that Ocotea is a polyphyletic genus (Trofimov et al. 2019; Penagos-Zuluaga et al. 2021). Thus, within Ocotea several groups of species can be recognized (van der Werff 2002). In recent years, some of them have been elevated to the rank of genus based on phylogenetic and morphological evidence (Trofimov et al. 2019; Trofimov and Rohwer 2020).

One of the best-defined groups in Ocotea is the so-called Ocotea helicterifolia group, which consists of around 40 Mexican and Central American tree species (Rohwer 1991, van der Werff 2002). It is characterized by the combination of mostly pubescent leaves, hermaphroditic flowers with spreading tepals, short-filamented and papillose stamens, anthers with locelli arranged in two superposed pairs, and fruit cupules with a single margin (van der Werff 2002). Additionally, a recent study revealed micromorphological characteristics supporting this delimitation; Ocotea helicterifolia group species share a rhombic-shaped stomatal complex and a narrowly lip-shaped aperture field of stomata (Trofimov and Rohwer 2018). Ecologically, a significant number of species are found in cloud forests at high altitudes, whilst only some species inhabit lowland tropical forests (Rohwer 1991; Lorea-Hernández and van der Werff 2002; van der Werff 2002; Lorea-Hernández 2005). Moreover, phylogenetic analyses suggest that the Ocotea helicterifolia group is a sister clade to the genus Damburneya and is not related to other species of Ocotea (Trofimov et al. 2016; Penagos-Zuluaga et al. 2021).

During a field study in Southern Mexico, two new species of Ocotea were collected in the tropical rainforest of the Uxpanapa region. In the context of the genus, the two new species belong to the O. helicterifolia group and present a unique combination of morphological features, which allows them to be distinguished from any other species. These interesting species are herein described and illustrated, and their morphological relationships with other species of Ocotea are discussed.

Materials and methods

We visited and reviewed the specimens of Ocotea deposited at the MEXU herbarium, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). Also, we consulted the digitized type specimens available at JSTOR Global Plants (http://plants.jstor.org/). Thus, the new species were recognized using the unique combination of features criterion (Donoghue 1985) through comparisons with morphologically similar species and literature review (e.g. Rohwer 1991, van der Werff 2002). Finally, species descriptions were elaborated following the terminology presented in Hickey (1973).

We analyzed the stomata features of both species using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) at the Biodiversity Photography and Microscopy Laboratory (LANABIO) at UNAM. Leaf material for SEM was rehydrated with hot water for an hour and immersed in distilled water with a drop of biological soap to be subjected to an ultrasonic bath for two rounds of 90 seconds to remove debris. Rehydrated and clean samples were then rinsed in two soaks of distilled water. Then, samples were dehydrated gradually with alcohol (ethanol) solutions of 10, 30, 50, 70, 80, 90 and 100% for 30 minutes each. Finally, samples were critical-point dried using extra-dry CO2, mounted on metal sample holders, and covered with gold. Sample observation was conducted with a Hitachi SU1510® (Hitachi City, Japan) scanning electron microscope.

Based on all known localities for the new species, we assessed their conservation status by calculating their extent of occurrence (EOO) and their area of occupancy (AOO) using the GeoCAT tool (Bachman et al. 2011) and applying the IUCN Red List categories and criteria and the guideline (IUCN 2012; 2024).

Results

Two new species of Ocotea belonging to the Ocotea helicterifolia group

The morphological characteristics of both species suggest that they belong to the Ocotea helicterifolia group. Specifically, both species share pubescent leaves, hermaphroditic flowers with spreading tepals, short-filamented and papillose stamens and anthers with locelli arranged in two superposed pairs. This circumscription was further confirmed by their rhombic-shaped stomatal complexes (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. 

SEM photos of the stomatal complex A Ocotea bella B Ocotea caelestis.

Within the Ocotea helicterifolia group, both species are morphologically similar to Ocotea bourgeauviana (Mez) van der Werff, Ocotea congregata van der Werff, Ocotea tonii (Lundell) van der Werff, and Ocotea verticillata Rohwer, with which they share the clustered leaves. However, both species independently exhibit a unique combination of morphological characteristics, allowing us to conclude that they are new species for science (see Table 1). Thus, both species are described and illustrated below.

Table 1.

Morphological differences among Ocotea helicterifolia group species with clustered leaves.

Traits Ocotea bella Ocotea caelestis Ocotea bourgeauviana Ocotea congregata Ocotea tonii Ocotea verticillata
Leaf size 13–30 × 3–8 cm 7–17 × 2–5 cm 10–22 × 3–7.5 cm 9–17 × 4–7 cm 15–25 × 5–6 cm 14–26 × 4.5–14.5 cm
Leaf apex shape acuminate to caudate acuminate to caudate acuminate to caudate obtuse to acute acuminate acuminate
Leaf base shape acute to cuneate acute to cuneate cuneate rounded or obtuse rounded obtuse to slightly cordate
Upper leaf surface texture bullate smooth smooth bullate smooth smooth
Petiole length 7–14 mm 5–8 mm 5–10 mm 10–25 mm Up to 6 mm 3–8 mm
Flower diameter 5.5–6.5 mm 4–5 mm 5–6 mm 7–9 mm 5.5–6.5 mm 7–10 mm
Tepal outer surface pubescent glabrous glabrous pubescent pubescent pubescent towards the base
Tepal inner surface pubescent towards the base pubescent towards the base pubescent pubescent towards the base pubescent pubescent
Stamen color reddish white White white white white
Anthers Without a sterile tip With a sterile tip Without a sterile tip Without a sterile tip With a sterile tip With a sterile tip
Staminode shape stipitiform capitate clavate stipitiform clavate stipitiform

Taxonomic treatment

Ocotea bella Reveles & Ortiz-Rodr., sp. nov.

Type.

Mexico • Veracruz, Uxpanapa, 700 m southwest from Progreso Chapultepec village, 17°14'12.1"N, 94°18'23.4"W, 73 m, 14 Apr 2024, Hurtado-Reveles L. 1994 (holotype: MEXU; isotypes: NY, MO).

Diagnosis.

Similar to Ocotea congregata in having clustered leaves with slightly bullate upper surface and condensed inflorescences, but differs from it in its narrowly elliptic to obovate leaves with acute to cuneate basis and shorter petioles, and by its smaller flowers with white tepals and reddish stamens (Table 1).

Description.

Trees , evergreen, 10–20 m tall, 15–20 cm DBH, bark smooth to slightly striate; twigs terete, densely covered with erect and adpressed, brown to light–brown trichomes, terminal buds 5–10 × 5–7 mm, densely covered with erect and adpressed golden sericeous trichomes. Leaves alternate-verticillate, clustered near the apex of branches (pseudo-verticillate), 3–8 × 13–30 cm, chartaceous, narrowly elliptic to obovate, apex acuminate to caudate, base acute to cuneate, often asymmetrical, upper surface slightly bullate, sparsely covered with erect light–brown trichomes, lower surface densely covered with erect light–brown trichomes, midrib slightly raised on the upper surface, prominently raised on the lower surface; secondary veins 9–12 on each side, slightly impressed above, prominently raised below; petiole swollen, 7–14 mm long, densely covered with erect and adpressed, brown to light–brown trichomes. Inflorescences condensed panicles, borne in the axils of distal leaves on recent growth, ca. 10 cm long, peduncles ca. 3 mm long, pedicels minute, the main axis, peduncles, pedicels and bracts densely covered with erect light–brown trichomes. Flowers bisexual, ca. 6 mm in diam.; tepals 6, subequal, white in anthesis, oblong, 2–2.5 × 1–1.5 mm, outer surface sparsely covered with adpressed, light–brown trichomes, inner surface glabrous or with trichomes only at the base; stamens 9, in three whorls, reddish in anthesis, ca. 1.5 mm long, filaments a third to half the length of the anther, densely covered with long hairs, as long as the filaments or as long as the stamens, anthers 4–locular, pollen sacs arranged in two pairs, one above the other, those in the outer two whorls introrse, those of the third whorl latrorse-extrorse, stamens of the third whorl with two globose glands at the base, staminodes minute, stipitiform, sometimes absent, pistil glabrous, ovary ovoid, 1 mm long, 0.6 mm in diam, style glabrous, ca. 0.1 mm long, stigma barely trifid. Fruits (immature), ellipsoid, 5–7 × 6–8 mm, cupule trumpet-shaped, 15–20 × 6–9 mm, some tepals persistent.

Figure 2. 

Ocotea bella Reveles & Ortiz-Rodr A general view of the tree (arrows indicate the specimen, which is a single individual with a bifurcated trunk at the base) B distal part of twig, with leaves and young growth C upper leaf surface D young fruits E inflorescence F trunks.

Phenology.

This species has been found with flowers in April and with fruits in June and July.

Etymology.

The specific epithet refers to the remarkable beauty (from Latin bella = beautiful or pleasant) of the flowers and leaves of this species.

Figure 3. 

Flowers and floral parts of Ocotea bella (SEM photos) A stamens, adaxial and abaxial view, first to third whorl, in pairs from top to bottom B external view of tepals C staminode D pistil E general flower view (one whorl II stamen missing).

Distribution.

Ocotea bella is known only from the Uxpanapa region in Veracruz, in Southern Mexico (Fig. 4).

Figure 4. 

A distribution of the Ocotea helicterifolia group species with clustered leaves B habitat of Ocotea bella at the type locality C habitat of Ocotea caelestis at the type locality. Distribution localities are based on specimen records at the MEXU Herbarium.

Ecology and habitat.

Ocotea bella inhabits tropical rainforests on reddish clay-rich soils, with a mean annual temperature of 25 °C and a mean annual precipitation of 3450 mm. It has been collected at the base of north-facing hill slopes near a small stream.

Conservation status.

We currently lack the necessary information to assess definitively the conservation status of Ocotea bella. However, based on application of the criteria established by the IUCN (IUCN 2012, 2024), we conclude tentatively that the species is Critically Endangered [CR B2ab(ii,iii)]. Its area of occupancy (AOO) is 4.0 km, within the limits of Critically Endangered status under criterion B. The species is known from a single location (sensu IUCN 2024), also within the limit of the Critically Endangered status. In addition, the species appears to be rare. We found only one mature individual within an area of approximately 2 km2. Moreover, this species is not found within any protected natural areas, and it faces threats from deforestation and unsustainable practices such as logging, fires, and illegal settlements. Thus, we project that the ongoing loss of its habitat will induce a strong continuous decline of its AOO.

Notes.

Among the species of Ocotea helicterifolia group, the reddish stamens of Ocotea bella are unique and distinguish it very well from any other species. It is an unusual character among neotropical Lauraceae. Additionally, the clustered leaves in this group seem restricted to northern Mesoamerica, ranging from Mexico to Honduras. Among the species with clustered leaves, the species most similar to Ocotea bella is Ocotea congregata van der Werff, endemic to Chiapas, Mexico (Fig. 4). Vegetatively, Ocotea congregata is distinguished from Ocotea bella by its smaller, broadly elliptical leaves, with rounded basis, obtuse to acute apex, and long petioles (Table 1). Additionally, Ocotea congregata prefers montane forests (around 1500 m altitude) whilst Ocotea bella is restricted to lowland forests (200–300 m altitude).

Ocotea caelestis Ortiz-Rodr. & Reveles, sp. nov.

Figs 5, 6

Type.

Mexico • Veracruz, Uxpanapa, 5 km south from Poblado 2 village, 17°11'28.4"N, 94°38'34.4"W, elev. 195 m, 1 May 2023, Hurtado-Reveles L. 1995 (holotype: MEXU; isotypes: NY, MO).

Diagnosis.

Similar to Ocotea bourgeauviana in having clustered leaves and a glabrous outer surface of the tepals, but differs from it in its smaller leaves and flowers, adaxial surface only pubescent at the base, tongue-shaped stamens with a sterile tip and with pubescent filaments (Table 1).

Figure 5. 

Ocotea caelestis Ortiz-Rodr. & Reveles A general view of the tree B tip of flowering branch, showing leaf and inflorescence arrangement C flowers D apical part of recent growth showing the indument E branches with young and mature leaves.

Description.

Trees , evergreen, 4–8 m tall, 8–12 cm DBH; bark smooth to slightly striate; twigs terete, densely covered with erect and adpressed, golden trichomes, glabrous with age, terminal buds 5 × 5 mm, densely covered with erect and adpressed golden trichomes. Leaves aggregated to alternate-verticillate, clustered near the apex of branches, 2–5 × 7–18 cm, coriaceous, elliptic to lanceolate, base acute to attenuate, apex acute to caudate, upper surface smooth, glabrous, lower surface densely covered with erect golden trichomes, midrib slightly raised on the upper surface, prominently raised on the lower surface; secondary veins 5–8 on each side, slightly impressed above, prominently raised below; petiole swollen, 5–8 mm long, densely covered with erect and adpressed, golden trichomes. Inflorescences, paniculate–cymose, axillary, 4–8 cm long, pedicels 1–3 mm long, the main axis, peduncles, pedicels and bracts densely covered with erect light–brown trichomes. Flowers bisexual, 4–5 mm in diam., tepals 6, subequal, ovate to elliptic, 2–3 × 1–2 mm, outer surface glabrous, inner surface with sparse, brown sericeous trichomes only near the base, stamens 9, in three whorls, white, ca. 1.5 mm long, filaments very short to anthers almost sessile, densely covered with small trichomes, anthers tongue-shaped, with a sterile tip which extends for ca. a third of the length of the total length of the anther, 4–locular, pollen sacs in two pairs above each other, inner stamens with two globose glands at the base, staminodes capitate, ca. 0.8 mm long, filament short and pubescent, pistil glabrous, ovary ovoid, 10 × 8 mm, style glabrous, ca. 0.5 mm long. Fruit unknown.

Figure 6. 

Flowers and floral parts of Ocotea caelestis (SEM photos) A adaxial view of tepals B stamens, adaxial and abaxial view, first to third whorl, in pairs from top to bottom C staminode abaxial and side view D pistil E flower, lateral view, one tepal of first whorl (in front) removed.

Phenology.

This species has been collected with flowers from April to May.

Etymology.

The specific epithet refers to the ethereal appearance of this species (from the latin caelestis= heavenly appearance). The fine and dense golden indument in young leaves and twigs gives it a particular brightness during the first hours of the day. Moreover, inflorescences in living specimens notably rise above the flaccid leaves, which combined with their soft whitish color and almost glassy look gives them an ethereal appearance.

Distribution.

Ocotea caelestis is known only from the Uxpanapa region in Veracruz, Southern Mexico (Fig. 4).

Ecology and habitat.

Ocotea caelestis inhabits the tropical rainforests established on deep soils, with mean annual temperatures of 25 °C and mean annual precipitation of around 3250 mm. It occupies areas close to the hill ridges.

Conservation status.

Based on the criteria established by the IUCN (IUCN 2012, 2024), we conclude tentatively that the species is Critically Endangered [CR B2ab(ii,iii,v)]. Its area of occupancy (AOO) is 8.0 km2, within the limits of the Critically Endangered status under criterion B. The species is known from one location (sensu IUCN 2024), also within the limit of Critically Endangered status. Furthermore, only two adult individuals within an approximate area of 1 km2 have been found. The oldest collection near the type locality is more than 30 years old, suggesting that the species may persist in forest patches. Since the species is not found within any protected area, the increasing land use for livestock farming in the region is likely its main threat.

Additional specimens examined.

Mexico • Veracruz, Jesús Carranza, south from Poblado 2 village, 17°12'00"N, 94°38'30.0"W, elev. 200 m, 12 Apr 1987, Tom Wendt & H. Hernández G. 5622 (MEXU).

Notes.

Within the Ocotea helicterifolia group, tongue-shaped stamens with a sterile tip have been reported only in Ocotea botrantha Rohwer, Ocotea sinuata (Mez) Rohwer, Ocotea tonii (Lundell) van der Werff, Ocotea verticillata Rohwer and now in Ocotea caelestis. The clustered leaves relate Ocotea caelestis to Ocotea verticillata, from which it differs in its smaller leaves, with acute to cuneate basis, smaller flowers, outer surface of tepals glabrous, inner surface pubescent only at the base, and capitate staminodes shape (see Table 1).

Vegetatively, Ocotea caelestis is very similar to Ocotea bourgeauviana (Mez) van der Werff and could hardly be separated in the absence of flowers. Flowering specimens of the two species can be easily distinguished. Flowers in O. bourgeauviana have trichomes distributed throughout the inner surface of the tepals (only at the base in Ocotea caelestis), and its stamens are not tongue-shaped and do not have a sterile tip. Moreover, both species are allopatrically distributed (Fig. 4).

Discussion

Taxonomic novelties within a hyper-diverse region: Uxpanapa, Mexico

The isolated mountains of the Tehuantepec Isthmus in the Mexican states of Chiapas, Oaxaca, and Veracruz have long fascinated taxonomists due to their high level of endemism and species richness (Wendt 1987; Salazar 1999; Molina-Paniagua et al. 2023). In particular, the region of Uxpanapa, located between the states of Veracruz and Oaxaca, is considered a center of speciation and harbors many endemic species (Wendt 1987). Speciation processes in the Uxpanapa region may have been influenced by its role as a refuge for wet-tropical species during Pleistocene climatic fluctuations, as well as by its topographical complexity (Wendt 1987; Molina-Paniagua et al. 2023).

Only in the last two decades, several new plant species have been described from this region [e.g. Ceratozamia dominguezii Pérez-Farr. & Gut.-Ortega (Zamiaceae), Desmopsis terriflora G.E. Schatz, T. Wendt, Ortiz-Rodr. & Mart.-Vel. (Annonaceae), Ixchelia uxpanapana (T. Wendt) Wahlert & H.E. Ballard (Violaceae), Lobelia lithophila Senterre & Cast.-Campos (Campanulaceae), Magnolia uxpanapana A. Vázquez, Padilla-Lepe & Gallardo-Yobal (Magnoliaceae), Mortoniodendron uxpanapense Dorr & T. Wendt (Malvaceae), Peperomia nopalana G. Mathieu, P. trichobracteata G. Mathieu & T. Krömer & P. xalana G. Mathieu (Piperaceae), Styrax uxpanapensis P.W. Fritsch (Styraceae) (Dorr and Wendt 2004; Fritsch 2005; Senterre and Castillo-Campos 2008; Wahlert et al. 2015; Jimeno-Sevilla et al. 2018; Pérez-Farrera et al. 2021; Martínez-Velarde et al. 2023; Vázquez-García et al. 2024)]. An interesting pattern is the high level of divergence between species endemic to the Uxpanapa region and their closest relatives distributed outside this region (e.g. Senterre and Castillo-Campos 2008; Martínez-Velarde et al. 2023). Of course, the species described here fit this pattern well. Ocotea bella has flowers with red stamens and white petals, features absent in other species of the Ocotea helicterifolia group. Also, only Ocotea caelestis has the combination of clustered leaves with acute to cuneate basis and tongue-shaped stamens with a sterile tip.

Despite all of this, the Uxpanapa region is considered poorly surveyed, with intermittent exploration periods, old and unrepresentative collections and few specimens per species (Carvajal-Hernández 2018). Consequently, it is not surprising that new botanical explorations are leading to the discovery of new taxa. Considering the biological context, the Uxpanapa region’s future is alarmingly concerning. It is an area highly impacted by humans and vulnerable to climate change (Aguilar-López et al. 2016). Ongoing efforts to study and catalogue its biodiversity need to be strengthened, and effective conservation programs must be implemented (Carvajal-Hernández 2018).

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the MEXU Herbarium team of the Instituto de Biología, UNAM, for their help received while conducting herbarium work, specifically: Laura Calvillo, Angélica Ramírez, Gilda Ortiz, Verónica Juárez, María del Rosario García, Rosalinda Medina and Alberto Reyes. We also want to thank María Berenit Mendoza Garfias from the LaNaBio (Laboratorio Nacional de la Biodiversidad) in the Instituto de Biología, UNAM, for her help and support in examining the specimens under Scanning Electron Microscope. Also, we thank Mr. Urbano and Ms. Isabel from Progreso Chapultepec village, Veracruz, Mexico, for the help provided to the authors while conducting fieldwork in the surrounding area. We sincerely thank Jens Gunter Rohwer and Lang Li for their encouraging and constructive comments on the previous versions of the manuscript.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

Leopoldo Hurtado-Reveles took part in this project while conducting his doctorate studies funded by Mexico’s Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías (CONAHCYT), with grant number 812836. This paper fulfills part of the requirements for his Doctoral degree at the Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, UNAM.

Author contributions

LHR & AEOR conceived the idea, conducted the fieldwork, analysed the data and wrote the final version of the manuscript.

Author ORCIDs

Leopoldo Hurtado-Reveles https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1660-2535

Andrés Ernesto Ortiz-Rodriguez https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4583-6701

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  • Aguilar-López JL, Pineda E, Luría-Manzano R, Canseco-Márquez L (2016) Species diversity, distribution, and conservation status in a Mesoamerican region: Amphibians of the Uxpanapa-Chimalapas Region, Mexico. Tropical Conservation Science 9(4): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082916670003
  • Bachman S, Moat J, Hill AW, De La Torre J, Scott B (2011) Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: Geospatial conservation assessment tool. ZooKeys 117(150): 117–126. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.150.2109
  • Carvajal-Hernández CI (2018) A new species, new combinations in Pecluma and Pleopeltis, and new records for the State of Veracruz, Mexico. American Fern Journal 108(4): 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1640/0002-8444-108.4.139
  • Chanderbali AS, van der Werff H, Renner SS (2001) Phylogeny and historical biogeography of Lauraceae: Evidence from the chloroplast and nuclear genomes. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 88(1): 104–134. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666133
  • Donoghue MJ (1985) A critique of the biological species concept and recommendations for a phylogenetic alternative. The Bryologist 88(3): 172–181. https://doi.org/10.2307/3243026
  • Dorr LJ, Wendt T (2004) A new species of Mortoniodendron (Malvaceae sens. lat.) from the rain forests of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, México. Lundellia 2004(7): 44–52. https://doi.org/10.25224/1097-993X-7.1.44
  • Fritsch PW (2005) A new species of Styrax (Styracaceae) from southern Mexico. Novon, 421–424.
  • IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List categories and criteria: version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission.
  • Jimeno-Sevilla HD, Vergara-Rodriguez D, Krömer T, Armenta-Montero S, Mathieu G (2018) Five endemic Peperomia (Piperaceae) novelties from Veracruz, Mexico. Phytotaxa 369(2): 93–106. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.369.2.3
  • Liu ZF, Ci XQ, Li L, Li HW, Conran JG, Li J (2017) DNA barcoding evaluation and implications for phylogenetic relationships in Lauraceae from China. PLoS ONE 12(4): e0175788. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175788
  • Lorea-Hernández FG (2002) La familia Lauraceae en el sur de México: Diversidad, distribución y estado de conservación. Botanical Sciences (71): 59–70. https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.1663
  • Martínez-Velarde MF, Rodrigues-Vaz C, Soulé V, Nge FJ, Schatz GE, Couvreur TLP, Ortiz-Rodriguez AE (2023) Desmopsis terriflora, an extraordinary new species of Annonaceae with flagelliflory. PhytoKeys 227: 181–198. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.227.102279
  • Molina-Paniagua ME, Alves de Melo PH, Ramírez-Barahona S, Monro AK, Burelo-Ramos CM, Gómez-Domínguez H, Ortiz-Rodriguez AE (2023) How diverse are the mountain karst forests of Mexico? PLoS ONE 18(10): e0292352. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292352
  • Penagos Zuluaga JC, van der Werff H, Park B, Eaton DA, Comita LS, Queenborough SA, Donoghue MJ (2021) Resolved phylogenetic relationships in the Ocotea complex (Supraocotea) facilitate phylogenetic classification and studies of character evolution. American Journal of Botany 108(4): 664–679. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1632
  • Pérez-Farrera MA, Gutiérrez-Ortega JS, Vovides AP, Calonje M, Díaz-Jiménez P (2021) Ceratozamia dominguezii (Zamiaceae): A New Cycad Species from Southeastern Mexico. Taxonomy 2021(1): 345–359. https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy1040026
  • Rohde R, Rudolph B, Ruthe K, Lorea-Hernández FG, Moraes PLRD, Li J, Rohwer JG (2017) Neither Phoebe nor Cinnamomum–the tetrasporangiate species of Aiouea (Lauraceae). Taxon 66(5): 1085–1111. https://doi.org/10.12705/665.6
  • Rohwer JG (1991) Borderline cases between Ocotea, Nectandra and Phoebe (Lauraceae): The “marginal” species of the Ocotea helicterifolia–group, including the O. heydeana group. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 112: 365–397.
  • Rohwer JG, Li J, Rudolph B, Schmidt SA, van der Werff H, Li HW (2009) Is Persea (Lauraceae) monophyletic? Evidence from nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences. Taxon 58(4): 1153–1167. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.584009
  • Salazar GA (1999) Novelties in Mexican Orchidaceae, mainly from the Uxpanapa-Chimalapa region, Veracruz and Oaxaca. Anales del Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Serie Botánica 70: 1–12.
  • Senterre B, Castillo-Campos G (2008) A new rare species of Lobelia (Campanulaceae, Lobelioideae) from Mexican lowland rainforest. Novon 18(3): 378–383. https://doi.org/10.3417/2007020
  • Trew BT, Maclean IM (2021) Vulnerability of global biodiversity hotspots to climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography 30(4): 768–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13272
  • Trofimov D, Rohwer JG (2018) Epidermal features allowing identification of evolutionary lineages in the Ocotea complex (Lauraceae). Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 31: 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2017.12.003
  • Trofimov D, Rohwer JG (2020) Towards a phylogenetic classification of the Ocotea complex (Lauraceae): An analysis with emphasis on the Old World taxa and description of the new genus Kuloa. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 192(3): 510–535. https://doi.org/10.1093/botlinnean/boz088
  • Trofimov D, Rudolph B, Rohwer JG (2016) Phylogenetic study of the genus Nectandra (Lauraceae), and reinstatement of Damburneya. Taxon 65(5): 980–996. https://doi.org/10.12705/655.3
  • Trofimov D, De Moraes PL, Rohwer JG (2019) Towards a phylogenetic classification of the Ocotea complex (Lauraceae): Classification principles and reinstatement of Mespilodaphne. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 190(1): 25–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/botlinnean/boz010
  • van der Werff H (1991) A key to the genera of Lauraceae in the New World. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 78(2): 377–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/2399567
  • van der Werff H (2002) A synopsis of Ocotea (Lauraceae) in Central America and southern Mexico. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 89(3): 429–451. https://doi.org/10.2307/3298602
  • van der Werff H (2020) Studies in Andean Ocotea (Lauraceae) V. Species with unisexual flowers and sparsely appressed-pubescent or glabrous leaves without domatia occurring above 1000 m in altitude. Novon 28(3): 192–230. https://doi.org/10.3417/2020450
  • van der Werff H, Richter HG (1996) Toward an improved classification of Lauraceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 83(3): 409–418. https://doi.org/10.2307/2399870
  • Vázquez-García JA, Padilla-Lepe J, Gallardo-Yobal S, Rodríguez-Pérez C, García-Escobar A, Muñiz-Castro MA (2024) Three new Mesoamerican species of Magnolia (M. sect. Talauma, Magnoliaceae) from the Chimalapas-Uxpanapa region, Mexico. Phytotaxa 652(1): 10–32. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.652.1.2
  • Wendt T (1987) Las selvas de Uxpanapa, Veracruz-Oaxaca, México: Evidencia de refugios florísticos cenozoicos. Anales del Instituto de Biología 58: 29–54.
login to comment