Research Article
Print
Research Article
Didymocarpus pingyuanensis (Gesneriaceae), a new species endemic to Danxia landscape from Guangdong Province, China, and two new combinations in Didymocarpus
expand article infoLing-Han Yang, Jing-Min Dai, Fang Wen§|, Jian-Hui Liu, Xue-Zheng Lan#, Qiang Fan
‡ Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
§ Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guilin, China
| Guilin Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guilin, China
¶ Pingyuan County Wuzhishi Provincial Scenic Spot, Meizhou, China
# Pingyuan County Forestry Bureau, Meizhou, China
Open Access

Abstract

Didymocarpus pingyuanensis, endemic to the Danxia landscape in Pingyuan County, Guangdong, China, is described and illustrated here. This species can be distinguished from other members of Didymocarpus sect. Heteroboea by its calyx deeply 5-lobed to about three quarters of its length. The phylogenetic position of the new species within Didymocarpus was examined using nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences. Based on phylogenetics analysis and morphological evidence, we propose two new combinations, elevating the two varieties to species level, namely D. yinzhengii and D. gamosepalus.

Key words

Didymocarpus heucherifolius var. gamosepalus, Didymocarpus heucherifolius var. yinzhengii, flora of Danxia, taxonomy

Introduction

Didymocarpus Wall. was once a large genus with approximately 200 species (Weber and Brutt 1998). Recent molecular phylogenetic studies and morphological revisions of Didymocarpus have led to a reduction in the estimated number of species from 200 down to 60–80, with some species being transferred to Henckelia Spreng., Hovanella A.Weber & B.L.Burtt, Petrocodon Hance (Weber and Brutt 1998; Weber et al. 2000, 2011; Möller and Clark 2013).

For species of this genus in China, Wang et al. (1990) classified them into two sections: sect. Didymocarpus (herbs with stems) and sect. Heteroboea W.T.Wang auct. non Benth (herbs without stems). Sect. Heteroboea were initially defined by morphological characters, but on the basis of recent systematic results and morphological comparison, four species have been assigned to the genus Petrocodon, these species are P. bonii (Pellegr.) A.Weber & Mich.Möller, P. mollifolius (W.T.Wang) A.Weber & Mich.Möller, P. niveolanosus (D.Fang & W.T.Wang) A.Weber & Mich.Möller, P. hancei (Hemsl.) Mich.Möller & A.Weber (Weber et al. 2011). Recently, four new taxa within this section were discovered and published: Didymocarpus dissectus F.Wen, Y.L.Qiu, Jie Huang & Y.G.Wei (Wen et al. 2013) from Fujian Province, D. heucherifolius Hand.-Mazz var. yinzhengii J.M.Li & S.J.Li (Li and Li 2014) from Hunan Province, D. heucherifolius Hand.-Mazz var. gamosepalus Xin Hong & F.Wen (Xu et al. 2019) from Guangdong, China, and D. lobulatus F.Wen, Xin Hong & W.Y.Xie (Xie et al. 2020) from Zhejiang, China. In addition, D. subpalmatinervis W.T.Wang, which was placed in sect. Heteroboea has been transferred to Petrocodon as a new combination with P. subpalmatinervis (W.T.Wang) F.Wen & Z.L.Li after a thorough study (Li et al. 2023). Thus, before the completion of the revision work for this article, there were eight species and two varieties in sect. Heteroboea, all of which are endemic to China.

During a field investigation of Danxia landscapes in Pingyuan County, Guangdong, in April 2023, we encountered a Didymocarpus species in bloom and confirmed its classification within sect. Heteroboea of this genus as it was stemless herb (Wang et al. 1990). However, it differs from all known species in this section by having a calyx that is deeply 5-lobed to about three quarters of its length. After thorough morphological comparisons using herbarium specimens, digital images, and relevant literature on other similar species, we concluded that this plant represents an undescribed species. Here, the putative species is described and illustrated based on morphological observations and compared with closely related species. Additionally, we used nuclear DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) to reconstruct the phylogeny to evaluate the phylogenetic position of Didymocarpus pingyuanensis.

Material and methods

Morphological study

We used a micrometer and a stereomicroscope to observe and measure the morphological traits of the putative species. Morphological comparisons between Didymocarpus pingyuanensis and its related species were based on dry specimens we collected, relevant literature (Wen et al. 2013; Li and Li 2014; Xu et al. 2019; Xie et al. 2020), as well as digital images on the Chinese Virtual Herbarium (https://www.cvh.ac.cn/) and the China Field Herbarium (https://www.cfh.ac.cn/). Morphological observation was conducted in the Herbarium of Sun Yat-sen University (SYS).

Taxon sampling and molecular analysis

The ITS region was used for examining the phylogenetic position of the putative species. During May 2023, we collected 6 taxa belonging to sect. Heteroboea for this study. These taxa included Didymocarpus cortusifolius (Hance) H.Lév., D. salviiflorus Chun, D. lobulatus, D. heucherifolius var. heucherifolius Hand.-Mazz, D. heucherifolius var. yinzhengii, D. heucherifolius var. gamosepalus. Except for D. heucherifolius var. gamosepalus, all species were collected from their type localities. The population of D. heucherifolius var. gamosepalus at its type locality has gone extinct due to human disturbance caused by nearby village activities. Consequently, we were unable to find it at its type locality in Pingyuan County, Guangdong. Instead, we collected specimens from Zijin County, Guangdong. Voucher specimens were deposited in SYS. We sequenced their ITS gene sequences to verify the molecular differences; the sequences have been uploaded to GenBank. Thirty-eight species of Didymocarpus and related genera with ITS gene sequences in NCBI GenBank were downloaded for analysis. In total, we got 45 ITS gene sequences of 45 taxa, GenBank accession numbers were followed after their Latin name in the phylogenetic tree. These taxa encompass three Gyrocheilos W.T.Wang species, one Allocheilos W.T.Wang species, one Raphiocarpus Chun species, six Primulina species, three Petrocodon species, nineteen species from Didymocarpus sect. Didymocarpus and nine from Didymocarpus sect. Heteroboea. Sinningia incarnata (Aubl.) D.L.Denham and S. tubiflora Fritsch were selected as outgroups. All but one species of Didymocarpus sect. Heteroboea were included in this study. The excluded species was Didymocarpus reniformis W.T.Wang, which was not located during multiple expeditions, and only imprecise locality data were available.

Total DNA was extracted from silica-gel-dried leaves using the modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) protocol (Doyle and Doyle 1987). Polymerase chain reaction was carried out based on the program setting as proposed by Lee et al. (2022) using the universal primers, ITS1 and ITS4 (White et al. 1990). The ITS sequence was aligned with Clustal W which is embedded in MEGA-11 (Tamura et al. 2021). The sequences in the alignment were manually adjusted. Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using the maximum likelihood (ML) methods and Bayesian inference (BI) methods via MEGA-11 (Tamura et al. 2021) and MrBayes v3.2.1 (Ronquist et al. 2012). The optimum DNA substitution model calculated using the “Find best DNA/Protein Models (ML) function embedded in MEGA-11 was Kimura 2-parameter model (K2) with Gamma Distributed With Invariant Sites (G+I) (=K2+G+I). All branch nodes were calculated with 1000 bootstrap (BS) replicates. BI analysis employed random starting trees and four Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations were run simultaneously and sampled every 1000 generations for 1 million generations. Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) were calculated as the majority consensus of all sampled trees with the first 25% discarded as burn-in.

Results and discussion

Molecular analysis

The aligned length of the ITS sequences was 730 bps. The topologies of the Bayesian and ML trees are incongruent. The BI tree is displayed below (Fig. 1), ML tree is displayed in Appendix 1: Fig. A1. The topology indicates that Didymocarpus sect Heteroboea is paraphyletic, and eight taxa of Didymocarpus sect Heteroboea belong to clade I (Fig. 1. PP = 1, BS = 100%). In this clade, the putative new species forms a sister group with Didymocarpus dissectus, D. heucherifolius var. gamosepalus and D. heucherifolius var. yinzhengii (Fig. 1. PP = 1, BS = 81%), while D. heucherifolius var. heucherifolius belongs to another group (Fig. 1, PP = 1, BS = 81%).

Figure 1. 

Bayesian inference (BI) tree based on ITS sequences of the new species Didymocarpus pingyuanensis and related species. Bayesian posterior probabilities are shown along the branches. The new species described in this study is shown in bold.

Morphological comparison

In Didymocarpus sect. Heteroboea, most species exhibit similar vegetative characteristics, except for D. dissectus, whose leaf margin is irregularly and distinctly 3- or 4-lobed in the distal 1/3–1/2. There are two varieties, D. heucherifolius var. gamosepalus and D. heucherifolius var. heucherifolius distributed in Guangdong Province, China. Both D. pingyuanensis and D. heucherifolius var. gamosepalus share the same distribution area, namely Pingyuan County in Guangdong, and both are distributed within the Danxia landscape. During the field investigation, we also found D. heucherifolius var. heucherifolius in Wuzhishi scenic spot, which is about 50 km from the locality of D. pingyuanensis. However, D. pingyuanensis can be distinguished from D. heucherifolius var. heucherifolius by its glabrous corolla. Furthermore, it can be distinguished from D. heucherifolius var. gamosepalus by its shorter corolla, and calyx deeply 5-lobed to about three quarters of the calyx length, lobes equal, obovate, apex rounded, rarely cuspidate, overlapping at margin.

Although Didymocarpus pingyuanensis and D. salviiflorus share calyx lobed and overlapping at margin, however, the former is deeply 5-lobed to about three quarters of the calyx length, contrasting with the latter 5-lobed to about half of the calyx length from the base. Additionally, D. pingyuanensis can also be distinguished from D. salviiflorus by bracts free, elliptic, and corolla glabrous outside.

Differences between the putative species and its morphologically related species, Didymocarpus heucherifolius var. heucherifolius, D. heucherifolius var. gamosepalus, and D. salviiflorus are shown in the following identification table (Table 1) and Fig. 2.

Figure 2. 

Morphological differences between Didymocarpus pingyuanensis, D. heucherifolius var. heucherifolius, D. heucherifolius var. gamosepalus, and D. salviiflorus A D. pingyuanensis B D. heucherifolius var. heucherifolius C D. heucherifolius var. gamosepalus D D. salviiflorus; 1. front view of corolla; 2. lateral view of corolla, showing calyx and bracts (Photographers: A–C by Qiang Fan D by Ling-Han Yang).

Table 1.

Morphological differences between the species Didymocarpus pingyuanensis, D. heucherifolius var. heucherifolius, D. heucherifolius var. gamosepalus, D. salviiflorus.

Character Didymocarpus pingyuanensis D. heucherifolius var. heucherifolius D. heucherifolius var. gamosepalus D. salviiflorus
Shape of calyx deeply 5-lobed to about three quarters of the calyx length, obovate, overlapping at margin 5-lobed to the base, broadly lanceolate to oblanceolate-linear or triangular 5-lobed from middle to above middle 5-lobed to about half of the calyx length from the base, depressed oblong, overlapping at margin
Bracts bracts free, elliptic, 5–12 mm, serrate, long ciliate bracts free, elliptic, 5–10 mm, serrate, long ciliate bracts free, 4–8 mm, serrate, long ciliate bracts free to connate, semiorbicular, ca. 5 mm, margin sparsely crenate
Size of corolla 1.8–3.8 cm long 2.5–3.2 cm long 3.6–4.3 cm long 2.5–3 cm long
Indumentum of corolla glabrous puberulent glabrous puberulent
Staminodes 1.5–4 mm from the base 1–2 mm from the base 1–1.6 cm from the base 3–5 mm from the base

Taxonomic treatment

Didymocarpus pingyuanensis Ling H.Yang, Q.Fan & F.Wen, sp. nov.

Figs 3, 4

Diagnosis

Didymocarpus pingyuanensis is similar to D. heucherifolius var. gamosepalus and D. salviiflorus in having a similar zygomorphic corolla and pink to pinkish-purple funnel-shaped to tubular corolla tube, but can be distinguished from D. heucherifolius var. gamosepalus by its corolla size 1.8–3.8 cm long (vs. 3.6–4.3 cm long), calyx deeply 5-lobed to about three quarters of the calyx length, apex rounded, rarely cuspidate, overlapping at margin (vs. 5–lobed from middle to above middle); from D. salviiflorus, it differs by having calyx 5-lobed to about three quarters of the calyx length (vs. 5-lobed to about half of the calyx length from the base), bracts free, elliptic (vs. bracts free to connate, semiorbicular), and corolla glabrous outside (vs. puberulent outside).

Type

China. Guangdong Province: Meizhou City, Pingyuan Town, 24°32'N, 115°50'E, 491 m a.s.l., 1 April 2023 (fl.), Qiang Fa, Xing-yue Zhang, Li-juan Liao, Jie-hao Jin, Ling-han Yang DNPC 3352 (holotype: SYS!; isotypes: IBK! IBSC! SYS!)

Description

Acaulescent perennial herb. Rhizome horizontal, 2–4 cm long, ca. 1 cm in diameter. Leaves 4–9 basal, clustered at the apex of the rhizome, whorled; leaf blades chartaceous, orbicular-ovate to triangular, 4–11 cm long, 4.5–12 cm wide, apex slightly acute, base cordate, margin lobed (lobes 18–21, irregularly triangular, with irregular teeth), upper surface densely cover with white pilose hairs, green, lower surface with sparsely short hairs and pilose brown hairs confined to the veins, pale green, basal veins 5, palmate; petiole terete, pale green, 2.5–9 cm long, densely covered with pilose brown hairs, Cymes axillary, usually 3–6 on a stem, pseudodichotomous, scapiform, each 2- to numerous flowered; Peduncle 10–18 cm long, covered with white dense short hairs and sparsely pilose brown hairs; Bracts free, elliptic, 5–12 mm long, serrate, long ciliate; Pedicel up to ca. 2.5 cm long, with short hairs; Calyx deeply 5-lobed to about three quarters of the calyx length, lobes equal, obovate, apex rounded, rarely cuspidate, overlapping at margin, 6–9 mm long, 4.5–6 mm wide at the widest part and 2–3 mm wide at the base, lobes margin denticulate, puberulent outside, glabrous inside. Corolla zygomorphic, pink to magenta, up to ca. 3.8 cm long; glabrous outside, inside with glandular puberulent hairs from the throat to the corolla base and two wide bright yellow strips at the throat; tube funnel-shaped to tubular, 1.2–2.3 cm long, ca. 6.5 mm in diameter at base, ca. 1.1 cm in diameter at throat; limb distinctly 2–lipped, adaxial lip 2-lobed to near middle, 0.6–1 × ca. 1.3 cm, obliquely triangular, abaxial lip 3-lobed to base, lobes rounded or oblong, ca. 0.9 × 1.6 cm, more or less equal. Stamens 2, adnate to corolla ca. 2 cm above the base of the corolla tube; filaments white, 8–13 mm long, slightly geniculate above base, swollen at middle, glabrous with glandules on the surface; anthers pale yellow, ca. 3 mm long, cohering face to face, white woolly. Staminodes 3, adnate to 1.5–4 mm above the base of the corolla tube, 0.4–0.8 mm long, white, glabrous. Pistil 2.2–3 cm long, puberulent; ovary white, cylindrical, puberulent; style ca. 2.3 mm long; stigma 1, cephaloid, centrally sunken, undivided, translucent. Capsule purplish-red when young, linear-cylindrical, glandular puberulent, up to ca. 9 cm long.

Figure 3. 

Didymocarpus pingyuanensis A habitat in flowering B adaxial surface view of leaf blade C abaxial surface view of leaf blade D capsule E front view of corolla F lateral view of corolla, showing calyx deeply 5-lobed to about a quarter of the calyx length from the base G bracts H opened corolla I staminodes J pistil K stamens (Photographers: A–K by Qiang Fan).

Phenology

The flowering of Didymocarpus pingyuanensis is from April to May; and the fruiting is in June.

Distribution and habitat

Didymocarpus pingyuanensis so far has only been found on three Danxia landscapes within Pingyuan County. It is locally abundant and endemic to a narrow area near the type locality. This species prefers moist, but sunny cliffs, at an elevation of 100–500 m a.s.l. In Pingyuan, the average temperature is 21.7 °C, and the average annual precipitation is 1637 mm.

Figure 4. 

Didymocarpus pingyuanensis Ling H. Yang, Q. Fan & F. Wen A habit B flower in front view C flower in lateral view D opened corolla, showing stamens and staminodes E stamens F pistil and stigma (Drawn by Rong-En Wu).

Etymology

The specific epithet refers to the type locality, Pingyuan County, Guangdong Province, China. The Chinese name of the new species is here given as 平远长蒴苣苔 (Píng Yuǎn Cháng Shuò Jù Tái).

Additional specimens examined

Didymocarpus pingyuanensis (paratypes): China, Guangdong, Pingyuan: Nantai Mountain, 24°33'N, 115°53'E, 168 m a.s.l., 6 May 2023, Qiang Fan, Zheng-Fei Li, Ling-Han Yang 20212 (SYS); Nantai Mountain, 24°32'N, 115°50'E, 491 m a.s.l., 7 May 2023, Qiang Fan, Zheng-Fei Li, Ling-Han Yang 20219 (SYS); Dahebei scenic spot, 24°36'N, 115°49'E, 300 m a.s.l., 7 May 2023, Qiang Fan, Zheng-Fei Li, Ling-Han Yang 20221 (SYS).

Didymocarpus heucherifolius: China, mountains between Shicheng in southeastern Jiangxi and Ninghua in western Fujian, 1200 m a.s.l., 7 May 1921, Te-Hui Wang (IBSC0005130, isotype).

Didymocarpus salviiflorus: China, Zhejiang, Lishui, 19 April 1930, Guan-Guang Zhong (00030758, isotype).

Didymocarpus heucherifolius var. yinzhengii: China, Hunan, Yongxing, 26°2'28″N, 113°9'8″E, 140 m a.s.l., 13 May 2023, Qiang Fan, Zheng-Fei Li, Ling-Han Yang 20265 (SYS).

Discussion

Morphologically, Didymocarpus pingyuanensis can be distinguished from other species within this genus belonging to Didymocarpus sect. Heteroboea by calyx deeply 5-lobed to about a quarter of the calyx length from the base, lobes equal, obovate, apex rounded, rarely cuspidate, overlapping at margin. Initially, Didymocarpus pingyuanensis seems morphologically like a new variety of D. heucheifolius var. heucheifolius, because only D. heucheifolius var. heucheifolius and D. heucherifolius var. gamosepalus distributed in Guangdong in Didymocarpus sect. Heteroboea. In addition, Didymocarpus pingyuanensis shares corolla glabrous outside with D. heucherifolius var. gamosepalus and D. heucherifolius var. yinzhengii, both of them were varieties of D. heucherifolius. However, according to the phylogenetic trees, D. pingyuanensis, two varieties of D. heucherifolius and D. dissectus form a sister group, while D. heucherifolius var. heucherifolius forms a sister group with D. cortusifolius, D. salviiflorus, D. lobulatus, D. grandidentatus, D. leiboensis and D. sinoprimulinus. Thus, we suppose D. pingyuanensis is a distinct species (Fig. 1), and elevate the two varieties of D. heucherifolius to species level, namely D. yinzhengii and D. gamosepalus.

New combination

Didymocarpus yinzhengii (J.M.Li & S.J.Li.) Ling H.Yang, Q.Fan & F.Wen, comb. nov.

Didymocarpus heucherifolius var. yinzhengii J.M.Li & S.J.Li. Phytotaxa 156 (3): 187. 2014.

Type

China. Hunan: near Yongxing County. alt. 300 m, 26°17'10"N, 113°11'25"E, 6 May 2011, Jia-Mei Li 1105062 (holotype: HEAC!); ibid. Jia-Mei Li 11501 (paratype: IBK!).

Didymocarpus gamosepalus (Xin Hong & F.Wen) Ling H.Yang, Q.Fan & F.Wen, comb. nov

Didymocarpus heucherifolius var. gamosepalus Xin Hong & F.Wen. PhytoKeys 128: 34. 2019.

Type

China. Guangxi Province, cultivated in the nursery of Gesneriad Conservation Center of China (GCCC), introduced from north of Guangdong Province: Pingyuan County, Meizhou City, growing in rocky crevices at the foot of a calcareous sedimentary rocky hill. 22 February 2019, flowering, WF20190222-05 (holotype: IBK!; isotype: AHU!)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Zuo-qian Wen of Nantaishan scenic spot for his support in the fieldwork. We are also grateful to Jie-Hao, Jin, Li-Juan Liao, Zheng-fei Li, Xing-yue Zhang for their assistance during field collections. We are deeply grateful to Mrs Rong-En Wu for her excellent illustrations in the manuscript. We appreciate Xing-yue Zhang’s help and suggestions for this article.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This study was supported by Guangdong Provincial Special Research Grant for the Creation of National Parks (2021GJGY034), Key Sci. & Tech. Research and Development Project of Guangxi (Guike ZY21195050), Guangdong Provincial Ecological Forestry Development Project (2020141), and the capacity-building project of SBR of CAS (KFJ-BRP-017-68).

Author contributions

Ling-Han Yang participated in field investigation, and taxonomic confirmation and wrote the original draft. Jing-Min Dai assists in the molecular analysis. Jian-Hui Liu, Xue-Zheng Lan participated in field investigation and collected the plants. Qiang Fan and Fang Wen are project leaders and contributed to paper writing.

Author ORCIDs

Ling-Han Yang https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8895-1543

Fang Wen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3889-8835

Qiang Fan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4254-6936

Data availability

The newly obtained sequences of Didymocarpus cortusifolius, D. salviiflorus, D. lobulatus, D. heucherifolius var. heucherifoliu, D. heucherifolius var. yinzhengii, D. heucherifolius var. gamosepalus have been submitted to the NCBI website. The ITS sequence data supporting the findings of this study are available in Fig. 1.

References

  • Lee SY, Xu KW, Huang CY, Lee JH, Liao WB, Zhang YH, Fan Q (2022) Molecular phylogenetic analyses based on the complete plastid genomes and nuclear sequences reveal Daphne (Thymelaeaceae) to be non-monophyletic as current circumscription. Plant Diversity 44(3): 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2021.11.001
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  • Wang WT, Pan KY, Li ZY (1990) Gesneriaceae. In: Wang WT (Ed.) Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, vol. 69. Science Press, Beijing, 420–451.
  • Weber A, Brutt BL (1998) Remodelling of Didymocarpus and Associated Genera (Gesneriaceae). Beitrage zur Biologie der Pflanzen 70: 293–363.
  • Weber A, Burtt BL, Vitek E (2000) Materials for a revision of Didymocarpus (Gesneriaceae). Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien. Serie B, Fur Botanik und Zoologie 102: 441–475.
  • White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J, Innis M, Gelfand D, Sninsky J (1990) Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics. In: Pcr Protocols: a Guide to Methods and Applications, vol. 18. Academic Press, New York, 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1

Appendix 1

Figure A1. 

Maximum Likelihood (ML) tree based on ITS sequences of the new species Didydmocarpus pingyuanensis and related species. Values of bootstrap support are shown along the branches. The new species described in this study is shown in bold.

login to comment