Research Article
Print
Research Article
 Mazus jiangshiense (Mazaceae), a new species from China: evidence from morphological and molecular analyses
expand article infoYong-Bin Chen, Xin-Yan Chen§, Liang Ma|, Zhuang Zhao, Shi-Pin Chen
‡ Fujian Vocational College of Bioengineering, Fuzhou, China
§ Sanming Garden Center, Sanming, China
| Fujian Health College, Fuzhou, China
¶ Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration for Orchid Conservation and Utilization at Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
Open Access

Abstract

Utilising both morphological and molecular analyses, this study unveils Mazus jiangshiense sp. nov., a novel addition to the Mazaceae family, discovered in Shaowu County, Fujian Province, China. The comprehensive description and illustrations provided here are a result of a meticulous exploration of its morphological features. While bearing a resemblance to M. gracilis, this new-found species is distinguished by three distinct characteristics: its stems are delicately soft, its leaves possess a membranous quality and the ovary is notably villous at the apex. Integration of molecular evidence, derived from the nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrITS) and three plastid DNA sequences (rps16, rbcL and trnL-trnF), unequivocally supports the classification of M. jiangshiense as a distinct species. Notably, the molecular analysis positions it as a sister species to M. spicatus, underscoring the phylogenetic relationships within the genus Mazus. Our research not only introduces M. jiangshiense as a novel taxonomic entity, but also provides a nuanced understanding of its morphological differences and molecular affinities, enriching our comprehension of the diversity and evolutionary relationships of Mazaceae.

Key words

Lamiales, Mazus, molecular markers, morphology, nrITS, phylogenetics, rbcL, rps16, trnL-trnF

Introduction

Mazaceae Reveal (2011) stands as a recently established family within Lamiales, distinctively separated from Phrymaceae according to several phylogenetic studies (Albach et al. 2005; Xia et al. 2009; Schäferhoff et al. 2010). Comprising four genera and approximately 43 species (Xiang et al. 2021), Mazus Loureiro (1790) takes precedence as the largest genus, encompassing 39 accepted species primarily distributed in Asia and Australasia (Hong et al. 1998; Fischer 2004; Deng et al. 2016). In China, the Flora of China (Hong et al. 1998) originally recorded 25 species and three varieties, but subsequent reports introduced new species, such as M. tainanensis T.H.Hsieh (Hsieh 2000), M. sunhangii D.G.Zhang & T.Deng (Deng et al. 2016), M. somggangensis S.S. Ying (Ying 2019), M. fruticosus Bo Li, D.G.Zhang & C.L.Xiang (Xiang et al. 2021) and M. danxiacola Bo Li & B. Chen (Li et al. 2022). These additions suggest that China likely serves as the epicentre of distribution and diversity within Mazus (Yang 1979; Hsieh 2000). While investigating the background resources of protected areas in Fujian Province, south-eastern China, a distinctive Mazus species with a creeping stem and villous ovary was discovered. Through a meticulous analysis of flowering specimens and molecular data, it was unequivocally identified as a new species. Consequently, we hereby introduce and describe this novel entity as Mazus jiangshiense sp. nov.

Materials and methods

In June and August of 2022, a comprehensive exploration of the putative new species was conducted within Jiangshi Provincial Nature Reserve, Shaowu City. Digital photographs of fresh plants in the field were taken by a Canon digital camera (6D) and flowers and fruits were collected and deposited in the Herbarium of the College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (FJFC). A Canon digital camera (6D) was used to document the plants in the laboratory, while micro-morphological features were examined under a stereomicroscope (SZM-41, LAOSVI).

To ascertain the phylogenetic position of this newly-discovered species, a curated set of 21 taxa within the Mazus, as per Li et al. (2022), was employed. Additionally, three species—Dodartia orientalis Linnaeus (Linnaeus 1753), Lancea tibetica Hook.f. & Thomson (Hooker and Thomson 1857) and Puchiumazus lanceifolius (Hemsl.) Bo Li, D.G.Zhang & C.L.Xiang (Xiang et al 2021)—were chosen as outgroups. Detailed voucher information and GenBank accession numbers for all specimens are outlined in Table 1. The phylogenetic analyses were conducted employing three plastid DNA sequences (rbcL, rps16 and trnL-trnF) and nuclear ribosomal ITS (nrITS). A total of 24 DNA sequences of rps16, 23 of rbcL, 23 of trnL-trnF and 20 of ITS were successfully obtained. By using the CTAB procedure of Doyle (1987), total genomic DNA was obtained from silica-dried leaves and the DNA was re-suspended in double-distilled water and kept at -40 °C. In a thermocycler (Eppendorf Scientific, Inc., Westbury, NY, USA), DNA amplifications were performed. For three plastid DNA sequences (rbcL, rps16 and trnL-trnF) and nuclear ribosomal ITS (nrITS), the fragments were respectively amplified with primers RH1/Z1352RC (Olmstead et al. 2001), rps16-2F/rps16-R3 (Bremer et al. 2002), c/f of Taberlet et al. (1991) and ITS1 and ITS4 (Wendel et al. 1995). There were 50 μl of final volumes used for PCR reactions, along with 1 μl of each specific primer (10 μM each), 5 μl 10× PCR buffer, 35–50 ng template, 1 μl 10 mM dNTP (2.5 mM each) and 0.2 μl MDBio Taq DNA Polymerase (MDBio, Taipei, Taiwan). After purifying PCR products with the Tian quick Midi Purification Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions, they were sequenced directly. Sequences newly obtained have been deposited in GenBank. The evaluation of phylogenetic relationships utilised Maximum Parsimony (MP), Maximum Likelihood (ML), and Bayesian Inference (BI) techniques, executed on the CIPRES Science Gateway web server (RAxML-HPC2 on XSEDE v.8.2.12, PAUP on XSEDE v.4.a165 and MrBayes on XSEDE v.3.2.7a) as described by Miller et al. (2010), with parameters aligned as outlined by Chen et al. (2019).

Table 1.

Taxon, vouchers and GenBank accession numbers of the specimens. The asterisk (*) indicates the sequences obtained in this study; the others are from GenBank. A dash (–) indicates missing data.

Taxon Voucher rbcL rps16 trnL-trnF ITS
Mazus alpinus Masam. Sunhang11307 (Kun) KX783481 KX783501 KX783520 MK192641
M. caducifer Hance 35025 (Kun) KX783477 KX783497 KX783516 MK192664
M. celsioides Hand.-Mazz KX783486 (Kun) KX783486 MK266366 KX783525
M. danxiacola Bo Li & B. Chen 1 CB06425 (CSH) ON323565 ON323567 ON323569 ON286711
M. danxiacola Bo Li & B. Chen 2 CB05735 (CSH) ON323566 ON323568 ON323570 ON303604
M. fauriei Bonati Sunhang11248 (Kun) KX783479 KX783499 KX783518 LC034207
M. gracilis Hemsl. FJ172729 FJ172701 FJ172687 FJ172738
M. fruticosus Bo Li, D.G. Zhang & C.L. Xiang zdg4447 (Kun) KX783470 KX783490 KX783509 MK192660
M. humilis Hand.-Mazz. MK266367 MK266421 MK192667
M. longipes Bonati Deng1941 (Kun) KX783474 KX783494 KX783513 MK192652
M. miquelii Makino MW238406 MW238406 MW238406
M. novaezeelandiae W.R. Barker dtA68 (Kun) KX783469 KX783489 KX783508 MK192676
M. omeiensis H.L. Li nie1976 (Kun) KX807209 KX807203 KX807208 MK192636
M. procumbens Hemsl. zdg6074 (Kun) KX783478 KX783498 KX783517 MK192647
M. pulchellus Hemsl. dt093 (Kun) KX783472 KX783492 KX783511 MK192638
M. pumilio R. Br. Pagest.s.n.2021829 (Kun) KX783468 KX783488 KX783507 MK192671
M. pumilus (Burm. f.) Steenis FJ172728 FJ172700 FJ172686 FJ172737
M. radicans Cheesman dt472 (Kun) KT626738 MK266381 MK192635
M. spicatus Vaniot FJ172730 FJ172703 FJ172689 FJ172740
M. sunhangii D.G. Zhang & T. Deng zdg4142 (Kun) KX783484 KX783504 KX783523
M. xiuningensis X.H. Guo & X.L. Liu MW238409 MW238409 MW238409
M. jiangshiense OP616018* OP616019* OP616020* OP605381*
Outgroup
Puchiumazus lanceifolius (Hemsl.) Bo Li, D.G.Zhang & C.L.Xiang MW373737 MW373739 MW373741 MW364623
Dodartia orientalis L. XZ-2008-1 JQ342984 JQ342982 JQ342981 JQ342980
Lancea tibetica Hook.f. & Thomson dt108 (Kun) KX783467 KX807200 KX807205 MK192678

Result and discussion

Taxonomic treatment

Mazus jiangshiense Y.B. Chen, Xin Y. Chen & Liang Ma, sp. nov.

Type

China. Fujian Province, Shaowu County, 27°03'46"N, 117°15'40"E, elev. ca. 395 m, July 2022, Y.B. Chen et al. 20220801015 (holotype: FJFC, POC592371!; isotype: CSH, POC592372!) (Figs 2, 3)

Diagnosis

Results of morphological observation suggest that the newly-identified Mazus is similar to M. gracilis Hemsl. ex Forbes & Hemsl. (Forbes and Hemsley 1890) and M. procumbens Hemsl. ex Forbes & Hemsley (Forbes and Hemsley 1890), but it differs in the stem texture and whether the ovary is villous or not. It is also close to M. spicatus Vaniot (Vaniot 1905), but it can be easily distinguished by the growth habit of the stem and texture. Table 2 displays a detailed comparison of morphological characteristics.

Table 2.

Comparisons amongst M. jiangshiense and morphologically similar species. A dash (–) indicates missing data.

Characteristic M. jiangshiense M. gracilis M. procumbens M. spicatus M. caducifer M. radicans
Plant densely villous glabrous or soon glabrescent. white villous. white to pale rusty villous. white villous. hirsute
Stem creeping, soft, only inflorescence partially ascending. creeping, hard, only inflorescence partially ascending. creeping, hard, only inflorescence partially ascending. erect or base sometimes tilted, hard, never creeping. erect or ascending, hard. creeping
Leaf opposite or alternate, membranous, margin coarsely crenate, long petiolate, 2.5–5.5 cm. opposite, herbaceous, margin crenate to subentire, short petiolate, 1–2.5 cm. alternate or opposite, herbaceous, margin coarsely crenate, long petiolate, 1.5–6 cm. opposite or upper ones alternate, membranous, margin incised-serrate, 1–4 cm. opposite, papery, blade ovate-spatulate-petiolate, base tapering, margin coarsely irregularly serrate, 3.5–10 cm. leaves few, entire, 2.5–3.5 cm.
Inflorescence Racemes axillary or terminal, to 17.0 cm or more. Racemes usually lateral, rarely terminal, ascending, to 15 cm. Racemes terminal, to 13 cm or more. Racemes terminal, to 20 cm. Racemes terminal, to 35 cm. flowers solitary.
Corolla 0.9–1.1 cm. 1.2–1.5 cm. less than 1 cm. 0.8–1.2 cm. 1.3–1.8 cm.
Calyx funnelform, 3.0–4.0 mm, lobes longer than tube. campanulate, 4.0–7.0 mm, lobes as long as tube. campanulate, ca. 5.0 mm, lobes as long as, or slightly longer than, tube. campanulate, 5.0–8.0 mm in fruit, lobes as long as tube. funnelform, ca. 1.3 cm in fruit, lobes almost as long as tube.
Ovary long hirsute. glabrous. glabrous. long, hirsute. hirsute.

Description

Perennials, densely villous. Stems creeping to 50 cm, soft, slender, branched, base woody, inter-node nearly 5 cm, often longer than or equal to leaves, nodal rooting. Basal leaves are several to numerous, often deciduous. Cauline leaves opposite or alternate, leaf blade subrounded or oblong, membranous, 2.5–5.5 cm long including petiole, 2.1–4.1 cm width, larger at base of the stem, adaxially green, abaxially greyish-green to silver grey, apex acute to obtuse, base truncate and tapering, margin coarsely crenate, both sides villous; lateral veins 3–4 pairs, fluted adaxially, elevated abaxially and conspicuous on both surfaces; petiole 0.5–2.5 cm, slender, villous. Racemes axillary or terminal, obliquely ascending, to 17.0 cm or more, villous, sparse, multiflowered to 20; pedicels slender, 0.6 cm in fruit, densely villous; Calyx funnelform, 3.0–4.0 mm, slightly enlarged in fruit, villous on both surfaces, lobes 5, lanceolate, acute and longer than the tube. Corolla light purple or white, 0.9–1.1 cm long, dotted yellow on the palate and with sparse glandular-hair, tube cylindrical with glandular-hair, 0.4–0.5 cm long; limb 2-lipped, upper lip bilobed, lobes lanceolate, apex acute, slightly upturned; lower lip trilobed, middle lobe oblong, smaller and narrower than lateral lobes, lateral lobes broadly ovate, spreading away from middle lobes; plaits with sparse glandular hairs; palate comprising 2 longitudinal elevations, mostly hidden in the corolla tube, covered by sparse glandular hairs, clavate hairs, white to transparent, 0.6 mm long. Stamens 4, filaments protruding from the tube, appressed to the corolla tube, glabrous, included, anterior pair longer, curved, anthers positioned adjacent to the corolla tube on upper lip; Ovary villous, styles ca. 0.5 cm long, stigma lamellate, included. Capsule oblong, ca. 2.5 mm long, ca. 1.5 mm diam., apex rounded and villous. Seeds brown-yellow, numerous.

Chinese vernacular name

jiāng-shí-tōng-qúan-căo (将石通泉草).

Phenology

The flowering period is from June to July and the fruiting period is from August to September.

Etymology

The new species was named after the locality of Jiangshi Provincial Nature Reserve, where it was discovered.

Distribution and habitat

The species is distributed in Xiao Jiafang Town of Shaowu County, northwest Fujian Province, China and grows under a stone cave in a cliff at an elevation of approximately 395 m (Fig. 2A).

Phylogenetic analysis

The nucleotide sequence lengths for the new species nrITS, plastid rps16, rbcL and trnL-trnF are 550 bp, 806 bp, 1261 bp and 930 bp, respectively. Table 3 provides a summary of the characteristics of each dataset utilised in this study. The phylogenetic analyses are presented in the form of Maximum Likelihood (ML) trees and the support values, including bootstrap percentages (BSML/BSMP) and posterior probabilities (PP), are indicated near the respective nodes. Upon analysis of the combined dataset, the phylogenetic trees consistently demonstrated that the new species is closely related to M. spicatus, garnering robust support (BPML = 78, PP = 0.99, BPMP = 68). The tree derived from the nrITS dataset (Fig. 1A) corroborates this relationship, with strong support for the new species being the sister to M. spicatus (BPML = 82, PP = 0.99, BPMP = 75). However, the plastid-based phylogenetic tree introduces an intriguing twist, indicating that the new Mazus species is proximate to M. caducifer Hance (Hance 1882), M. spicatus and M. humilis Hand-Mazz (Hong et al. 1998). This forms a collapsed topology (Fig. 1B), suggesting a potentially intricate evolutionary relationship amongst these species.

Table 3.

Statistics from the three DNA datasets analysed.

DNA region No. of taxa Aligned length No. variable characters (%) No. informative characters (%) Tree length Consistency index Retention index
ITS 20 608 178 (29.28) 125 (20.56) 303 0.75 0.83
Plastid 24 3069 257 (8.37) 130 (4.24) 320 0.87 0.90
Combined 24 3677 435 (11.83) 255 (6.94) 641 0.79 0.85
Figure 1. 

The phylogenetic tree was constructed by the plastid, ITS and combined matrix using Maximum Likelihood, Maximum Parsimony and Bayesian Inference methods. The numbers near the nodes are bootstrap percentages and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPML, PP, BPMP). Separate combined results of nrITS (A) and plastid (B) are shown in the top left corner. A dash (-) indicates that the node is inconsistent between the Bayesian tree and the topology of the MP/ML trees. The asterisk (*) node is 1.00 posterior probability or 100 bootstrap percentage.

Conservation status. Following our comprehensive biodiversity survey of Shaowu Jiangshi Provincial Nature Reserve in July 2022, more than 500 individuals of Mazus jiangshiense have been identified in three distinct locations within the Reserve; the three populations are considerably distant from each other and collectively occupy an area of approximately 100 m2. Fruiting individuals were observed in each population. Given the management efforts of the Provincial Nature Reserve, it is currently at low risk of existential threats.

Figure 2. 

Morphology of Mazus jiangshiense A, B habitat C flowering plant D roots and stolons E leaves F inflorescence G a mature inflorescence with flowers and fruits H corolla I pedicel, calyx, stamens and pistils J fruit K seed.

Figure 3. 

Mazus jiangshiense Y.B.Chen, Xin Y. Chen & Liang Ma A plant B leaves C–E corolla F stamens G pistils H calyx I seed.

Acknowledgements

We extend our sincere appreciation to Jun-Ping Zhang and De-Wang Nie, the esteemed managers of Shaowu Jiangshi Provincial Nature Reserve, for their invaluable assistance during the fieldwork. Special gratitude is extended to Ming-Zhu Liu for his meticulous preparation of images and to Cheng-Yuan Zhou for his expertise and contributions to the molecular analyses. Their dedicated support significantly enriched the quality and depth of this research endeavour.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This research is supported by the 2023 Provincial Science and Technology Commissioner Special Funds (2023KTP2304).

Author contributions

Conceptualization: YBC, LM. Formal analysis: YBC. Funding acquisition: YBC. Investigation: YBC, XYC, LM. Methodology: YBC, ZZ. Supervision: SPC. Validation: SPC. Writing – original draft: YBC. Writing – review and editing: SPC.

Author ORCIDs

Yong-Bin Chen https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1099-3694

Xin-Yan Chen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8632-2216

Liang Ma https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7366-7290

Zhuang Zhao https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8021-3879

Shi-Pin Chen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8090-6616

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  • Bremer B, Bremer K, Heidari N, Erixon P, Olmstead RG, Anderberg AA, Källersjö MK, Barkhordarian E (2002) Phylogenetics of asterids based on 3 coding and 3 non-coding chloroplast DNA markers and the utility of non-coding DNA at higher taxonomic levels. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 24(2): 274–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00240-3
  • Chen SP, Tian HZ, Guan QX, Zhai JW, Zhang GQ, Chen LJ, Liu ZJ, Lan SR, Li MH (2019) Molecular systematics of Goodyerinae (Cranichideae, Orchidoideae, Orchidaceae) based on multiple nuclear and plastid regions. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 139: 106542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106542
  • Deng T, Zhang XS, Kim C, Zhang JW, Zhang DG, Volis S (2016) Mazus sunhangii (Mazaceae), a new species discovered in central China appears to be highly endangered. PLoS ONE 11(10): e0163581. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163581
  • Doyle JJ (1987) Rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11–15.
  • Forbes FB, Hemsley WB (1890) An Enumeration of all the plants known from China Proper, Formosa, Hainan, Corea, the Luchu Archipelago, and the Island of Hongkong, together with their distribution and synonymy. Part VIII. Journal of the Linnean Society. Botany 26(174): 181–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1890.tb00106.x
  • Hance HF (1882) Spicilegia florae sinensis: Diagnoses of new, and habitats of rare or hitherto unrecorded Chinese plants. Le Journal de Botanique 20(238): 289–296.
  • Hong DY, Yang HB, Jin CL, Holmgren NH (1998) Scrophulariaceae. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH (Eds) Flora of China, Vol. 18. Science Press, Beijing, 212 pp.
  • Hooker JD, Thomson T (1857) On three new Indian Scrophularineae. Hooker’s Journal of Botany and Kew Garden Miscellany 9: 244.
  • Hsieh TH (2000) Revision of Mazus Lour. (Scrophulariaceae) in Taiwan. Taiwania 45(2): 131–146.
  • Li B, Le XG, Min DZ, Xu L, Chen B (2022) Mazus danxiacola (Mazaceae), a distinct new species endemic to Danxia landform in Jiangxi Province, eastern China. PhytoKeys 199: 17–28. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.199.85717
  • Linnaeus CV (1753) Holmiae: Impensis Laurentii Salvii. Species Plantarum 2: 633.
  • Loureiro J (1790) Flora Cochinchinensis. Ulyssipone, Lisbon, 744 pp.
  • Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Gateway Computing Environments Workshop, New Orleans, 8 pp. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129
  • Olmstead RG, DePamphilis CW, Wolfe AD, Young ND, Elisons WJ, Reeves PA (2001) Disintegration of the Scrophulariaceae. American Journal of Botany 88(2): 348–361. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657024
  • Schäferhoff B, Fleischmann A, Fischer E, Albach DC, Borsch T, Heubl G, Müller KF (2010) Towards resolving Lamiales relationships: Insights from rapidly evolving chloroplast sequences. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10(1): 352. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-10-352
  • Taberlet P, Gielly L, Pautou G, Bouvet J (1991) Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17(5): 1105–1109. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037152
  • Vaniot E (1905) Plantae Bodinierianae Scrophulariaceae. Bulletin del Académie Internationale de Géographie Botanique 15: 85–86.
  • Wendel JF, Schnabel AS, Seelanan T (1995) Bidirectional inter locus concerted evolution following allopolyploid speciation in cotton (Gossypium). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92(1): 280–284. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.1.280
  • Xia Z, Wang YZ, Smith JF (2009) Familial placement and relations of Rehmannia and Triaenophora (Scrophulariaceae s.l.) inferred from five gene regions. American Journal of Botany 96(2): 519–530. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0800195
  • Xiang CL, Pan HL, Min DZ, Zhang DG, Zhao F, Liu B, Li B (2021) Rediscovery of Mazus lanceifolius reveals a new genus and a new species in Mazaceae. PhytoKeys 171: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.171.61926
  • Yang HP (1979) Mazus. In: Tsoong PC, Yang HP (Eds) Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, Vol. 67. Science Press, Beijing, 172–196.
login to comment