Research Article
Print
Research Article
Lectotypification of two names of Carex buekii hybrids (Cyperaceae) and notes on their morphology, ecology and distribution
expand article infoHelena Więcław, Radomír Řepka§, Jacob Koopman|
‡ University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
§ Mendel University, Brno, Czech Republic
| Unaffiliated, Choszczno, Poland
Open Access

Abstract

Lectotypes are designated for two Carex buekii hybrid names. The typification is supplemented with notes on their morphology, ecology, and distribution.

Key words

Carex ×ligniciensis, Carex ×vratislaviensis, section Phacocystis, typification, WRSL herbarium

Introduction

Carex L. (Cyperaceae) is one of the most species-rich angiosperm genera with more than 2,000 species distributed worldwide (POWO 2023). In a large genus like Carex hybridisation is especially frequent, however most of the Carex hybrids are restricted to a few sections, e.g. Ceratocystis Dumort., Glareosae G.Don, Phacocystis Dumort., and Vesicariae Heuff. (Cayouette and Catling 1992, Wallnöfer 2006, Więcław and Koopman 2013, Pedersen et al. 2016).

Carex buekii Wimm. belongs to the section Phacocystis, one of the largest and taxonomically most complex sections within the genus Carex, with about 110 species distributed worldwide. Furthermore, hybridisation is frequent in Phacocystis, and several species are of hybrid origin (Roalson et al. 2021). Carex buekii has hybridised with four other Phacocystis species so far: C. acuta L., C. cespitosa L., C. elata All., and C. nigra (L.) Reichard (Koopman 2022), all these four hybrids were described by Figert (1900, 1907).

Ernst Figert (1848–1925), a German (Prussian) teacher and botanist from Liegnitz (nowadays named Legnica, Poland) collected plants mainly from Lower Silesia, paying attention to difficult genera, e.g. Carex, Salix L., Mentha L., and their hybrids. Figert (1900) described the first two hybrids of C. buekii, C. × ligniciensis Figert [C. buekii × C. nigra] and C. × vratislaviensis Figert [C. acuta × C. buekii], based on plants collected on the same date and at the same site in Silesia (Poland). Figert (1900) did not select a type specimen or provide an illustration for C. × ligniciensis. Neither did he do so for C. × vratislaviensis when he named and described these two hybrids. Original material of C. × ligniciensis and C. × vratislaviens was found in the herbarium of WRSL (Poland). Both sheets were originally labelled by Figert. These hybrids are usually intermediate to the parental species and exhibit a wide range of morphological variability. Carex buekii hybrids, especially C. × vratislaviensis may be fertile and backcrosses appearing in populations are difficult to identify. These issues can lead to nomenclatural and taxonomic confusion and a lack of clarity in limits between parental species and hybrids. The lectotype of C. buekii has been designated (Jiménez-Mejías et al. 2014), the next step is the typification of its hybrids.

Material and methods

Taxonomic literature, including protologues, as well as fresh collections from parts of the Czech Republic and Poland, were examined. We also examined dried specimens deposited at the herbaria of BRNM, BRNU, JE, PR, PRC, and WSRL (acronyms based on Thiers 2023, continuously updated) and used the online database (JACQ Virtual Herbaria 2023) to check for type specimens. We have designated lectotypes, by comparing specimens with protologues, and selecting the most complete ones, in accordance with Art. 9.3 of the “Shenzhen Code” (Turland et al. 2018).

Results and discussion

Carex × ligniciensis Figert, Allg. Bot. Z. Syst. 6: 38 (1900) [C. buekii × C. nigra].

Lectotype (designated here)

Poland. Flora von Schlesien. Liegnitz: Parchwitz, auf einer Wiese an der Katzbach unter den Stammarten. 10/6/99. Leg. Figert (WRSL barcode WR GS 066846; isolectotype WRSL barcode WR GS 058738) (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. 

The lectotype of Carex × ligniciensis Figert (WRSL barcode WR GS 066846). Photo: Herbarium, Museum of Natural History University of Wrocław, Poland.

Morphology

The hybrid is mostly intermediate between the parental species and characterised by the following traits: ± tussocks 25–40 cm high, with numerous, shorter or longer creeping rhizomes; stems slender, with reddish brown to purple scale-like, non-reticulate basal sheaths, rough on the edges in the lower half; leaf blades 3–4 mm wide, with very long acuminate, bristle-like tip, very rough on the margin, dark green to grey-green; male spikes 1–2, oblong-cylindrical, glumes brown-black to black, obtuse, with a light central stripe, female spikes 3(–4), narrow, short cylindrical, proximate, lowermost slightly distant, lax at base, ca 4 cm long, pedunculate; female glumes ovate, shorter than utricles, dark brown; utricles empty, small, non-deciduous, green, without veins; lower bract shorter than inflorescence (Grulich et al. 2023). Wallnöfer (2006) stated that this hybrid has amphistomatic leaves (stomata on both sides of the leaves). This trait makes this hybrid impossible to confuse with the other C. buekii hybrids, which have only stomata on the lower surface of the leaves (hypostomatic). The first of the parental species, C. buekii, is hypostomatic while in the second one, C. nigra, the stomata are found on the upper (adaxial) side of the leaves (epistomatic).

Ecology

This hybrid was found in floodplains of large rivers where both parental species could meet. However, C. nigra avoids warm areas with the exception of isolated lowland fen sediments in previously flooded meadows, which corresponds to all known finds of this hybrid so far.

Distribution

Carex × ligniciensis is relatively rare and has been found so far in Poland, the Czech Republic and Italy (Koopman 2022). The specimens in BRNL, BRNM, CB, PR, and PRA were collected in the Czech Republic between 1921 and 1995, and they lack field verification. Therefore, we could consider it missing or even extinct at this locality. On the other hand, C. × ligniciensis is a very inconspicuous and apparently overlooked plant. In the Czech Republic, only one recent locality is known from the floodplain of the River Morava near the town of Kroměříž. As far as we know there are no recent findings of this hybrid in Poland, while its occurrence in Italy is at least questionable, as C. buekii is extremely rare in this country (Koopman et al. 2018).

The sterility of C. × ligniciensis limits it dispersal, however, the persisting of hybrid populations probably depends on vegetative reproduction, like with other sterile hybrids in Carex (Pedersen et al. 2016). The spontaneous recurrence and survival of hybrids under natural conditions are a driving force of plant speciation (e.g. Mallet 2007, Soltis 2013).

Carex × vratislaviensis Figert, Allg. Bot. Z. Syst. 6: 39 (1900) [C. acuta × C. buekii].

C. buekii Wimmer var. melanostachya R. Uechtr., Jahresber. Schles. Ges. Vaterl. Cult. 43: 236 (1865, publ. 1866).

Lectotype (designated here)

Poland. Flora von Schlesien. Liegnitz: Parchwitz, auf Wiesen an der Katzbach unter den Stammarten. 10/6/99. Leg. Figert (WRSL barcode WR GS 066847; isolectotypes: WRSL barcode WR GS 058739; JE barcode JE 00021673, barcode JE 00026167, barcode JE 00026168, barcode JE 00026169) (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. 

The lectotype of Carex × vratislaviensis Figert (WRSL barcode WR GS 066847). Photo: Herbarium, Museum of Natural History University of Wrocław, Poland.

Morphology

This hybrid is very variable, often intermediate between the parental species, but also tends to be morphologically closer to one of the parents. The utricles are very different in shape and size, from small ones similar to C. buekii, to more often closer in size to C. acuta. The leaf sheaths vary with the gene flow of the parental species: from reddish brown, robust, scale-like, shiny, reticulate, to intermediate types with smaller and slender sheaths than C. buekii, dark reddish brown, in spring with distinctive reticulate sheaths and in summer without. In the field, this hybrid is striking for its vegetative traits being close to C. acuta, but it has narrow and long female spikes (longer than those of C. acuta), especially the lowest one, which is pedunculate, interrupted at the base down to individual flowers and often pendent. The lowest bract sometimes exceeds the inflorescence, a character inherited from C. acuta (Koopman et al. 2018), but it is often shorter than, or as long as, the inflorescence. Carex × vratislaviensis is usually partially or fully fertile, less often sterile. In the field, backcrosses from the hybrid swarm are fertile and their traits match the variability of either parent. These plants are morphologically indistinguishable in the field from parental species. The only distinctive trait of this hybrid is the persistent small or larger red-brown scale-like basal sheaths.

Ecology

Both parental species are relatively commonly found, most often in the floodplains of large rivers, where both find suitable habitats (C. buekii: gravel-sand terraces covered with clay and littoral embankments; C. acuta: oxbows, reservoirs, eutrophic wetlands in floodplains with nutrient-rich sediments) (Kaplan et al. 2018). Most localities of C. × vratislaviensis correspond with the distribution of C. buekii, however, it was also found on banks of lakes and in adjacent marshes where C. acuta usually grows (Koopman et al. 2018). Řepka (2023) recently described large populations of the hybrid on the banks of the River Elbe near the town of Děčín (northern Bohemia), and at the edge of the field, a unique habitat completely outside the requirements of both parental species.

Distribution

It has been recorded so far in Austria, Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, and Slovakia (Koopman 2022).

Carex × vratislaviensis is an independent hybridogenous taxon (nothospecies) living autonomously in nature, mostly fully or partially fertile, and spreads spontaneously in the landscape. In the Czech Republic, it is currently documented in approximately 400 extensive populations. Based on current knowledge, it is now the most abundant hybrid (nothospecies) of the genus Carex in the Czech Republic. It has an excellent ability of clonal reproduction, and its utricles are spread by water birds to other habitats. At some habitats, especially in older meadows in the floodplains of large rivers, it can strongly dominate over the parental species or grow completely independently without their presence. In our opinion it can be compared with the hybridogenous C. recta Boott, also from the section Phacocystis, which has originated from hybridisation between C. aquatilis Wahlenb. and C. paleacea Schreb. Ex Wahlenb. (Standley 1990). It is presumed that C. × vratislaviensis influences other species and hybrids by its gene flow and forms triple hybrids or at least simply affects their fertility in situ (and the subsequent formation of empty utricles and thus empty spikes); however, this process needs further research.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to E. Lenart (WRSL, Wrocław, Poland) for helping to find the original material of the hybrids and for scanning the material. We are also indebted to J.W. Jongepier (Brno, Czech Republic) for checking the English and to the reviewers for their valuable comments on this paper.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

No funding was reported.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: HW, RŘ. Formal analysis: JK, HW. Project administration: HW. Visualization: HW. Writing – original draft: HW. Writing – review and editing: RŘ, JK.

Author ORCIDs

Helena Więcław https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8165-6532

Radomír Řepka https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9993-0042

Jacob Koopman https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8235-1108

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  • Cayouette J, Catling PM (1992) Hybridization in the genus Carex with special reference to North America. Botanical Review 58(4): 351–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858773
  • Figert E (1900) Botanische Mitteilungen aus Schlesien IV. Allgemeine Botanische Zeitschrift für Systematik 6: 37–40.
  • Figert E (1907) Botanische Mitteilungen aus Schlesien. Allgemeine Botanische Zeitschrift für Systematik 13: 3–5.
  • Grulich V, Řepka R, Štěpánková J (2023) Carex L. – ostřice. In: Štěpánková J, Kaplan Z, Chrtek J (Eds) Flora of the Czech Republic (Vol. 9). Academia, Praha, 179–360. [In press]
  • JACQ Virtual Herbaria (2023) Virtual Herbaria Website. https://www.jacq.org [Consulted on January 2022]
  • Kaplan Z, Koutecký P, Danihelka J, Šumberová K, Ducháček M, Štěpánková J, Ekrt L, Grulich V, Řepka R, Kubát K, Mráz P, Wild J, Brůna J (2018) Distributions of vascular plants in the Czech Republic. Part 6. Preslia 90(3): 235–346. https://doi.org/10.23855/preslia.2018.235
  • Koopman J (2022) Carex Europaea. The Genus Carex L. (Cyperaceae) in Europe 1. Accepted Names, Hybrids, Synonyms, Distribution, Chromosome Numbers, 3rd edn. Margraf Publishers, Weikersheim, 808 pp.
  • Koopman J, Dajdok Z, Więcław H, Martinetto E, Grulich V, Řepka R, Jiménez-Mejías P (2018) Global distribution of Carex buekii (Cyperaceae) reappraised. Phytotaxa 358(2): 139–161. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.358.2.3
  • Pedersen ATM, Nowak MD, Brysting AK, Elven R, Bjorĺ CS (2016) Hybrid origins of Carex rostrata var. borealis and C. stenolepis, two problematic taxa in Carex section Vesicariae (Cyperaceae). PLoS ONE 11: e0165430. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165430
  • Řepka R (2023) Carex × vratislaviensis. In: Lustyk P, Doležal J (Eds) Additamenta ad floram Reipublicae Bohemicae XXI. Bulletin of the Czech Botanical Society 58: 48–50.
  • Roalson EH, Jiménez-Mejías P, Hipp AL, Benítez-Benítez C, Bruederle LP, Chung K-S, Escudero M, Ford BA, Ford K, Gebauer S, Gehrke B, Hahn M, Qasim Hayat M, Hoffmann MH, Jin X-F, Kim S, Larridon I, Léveillé-Bourret É, Lu Y-F, Luceño M, Maguilla E, Márquez-Corro JI, Martín-Bravo S, Masaki T, Míguez M, Naczi RFC, Reznicek AA, Spalink D, Starr JR (2021) A framework infrageneric classification of Carex (Cyperaceae) and its organizing principles. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 59(4): 726–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12722
  • Standley LA (1990) Allozyme Evidence for the Hybrid Origin of the Maritime Species Carex salina and Carex recta (Cyperaceae) in Eastern North America. Systematic Botany 15(2): 182–191. https://doi.org/10.2307/2419172
  • Thiers B (2023) [continuously updated] Index Herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. http://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/ [Accessed 20 September 2023]
  • Turland NJ, Wiersema JH, Barrie FR, Greuter W, Hawksworth DL, Herendeen PS, Knapp S, Kusber WH, Li DZ, Marhold K, May TW, McNeill J, Monro AM, Prado J, Price MJ, Smith GF [Eds] (2018) International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017. Regnum Vegetabile 159. Koeltz Botanical Books, Glashütten. https://doi.org/10.12705/Code.2018
  • Wallnöfer B (2006) Die Verteilung der Stomata auf den Laubblattern als wichtiges diagnostisches Merkmal zur Unterscheidung der Arten und Hybriden in der Carex acuta- und C. rostrata-Verwandtschaft (Cyperaceae). Neilreichia 4: 195–208.
  • Więcław H, Koopman J (2013) Numerical analysis of morphology of natural hybrids between Carex hostiana DC and the members of Carex flava agg. (Cyperaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 31(4): 464–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.2013.00095.x
login to comment