Research Article
Print
Research Article
Hypericum liboense (Hypericaceae), a new species from Guizhou, China
expand article infoTian-Rou Wu, Jian Xu§, Ming-Tai An, Jiang-Hong Yu, Feng Liu, Zheng-Ren Chen|
‡ Guizhou University, Guiyang, China
§ Guizhou Botanical Garden, Guiyang, China
| Guizhou Maolan National Nature Reserve Administration, Libo, China
Open Access

Abstract

Hypericum liboense M.T.An & T.R.Wu, sp. nov. (Hypericaceae) is a newly described species found in the Maolan National Nature Reserve of Guizhou Province, where it grows in rocky habitats without soil on karst mountain tops. In this study, key morphological characters were compared between the new species and the other known Hypericum species of Hypericaceae. DNA sequences were extracted from the leaves of the new species, with nuclear gene sequences (ITS) generated to reconstruct phylogenetic trees and describe its phylogenetic position in relation to other species of Hypericum. Our results show that the proposed new species has the typical characteristics of the genus Hypericum in morphology being similar to Hypericum monogynum, but differing in its sessile and semi-clasped leaves, long elliptical to long circular leaf blades, thickly papery to thinly leathery, with entire and wavy leaf margins. The abaxial side of the leaves is covered with white powder, giving them a grey-white appearance. The main lateral veins of the leaves are 8–15-paired, and the midvein on both sides is convex. The main lateral veins and midvein branch are conspicuous, with tertiary venation forming a network on the leaf surface and appearing prominently sunken. The inflorescences are 1–3-flowered, with a large calyx and conspicuous veins. The molecular phylogenetic analysis (PP = 1.00) provided substantial evidence for the proposition of H. liboense as a new species within Hypericum. Morphological and molecular evidence is presented, corroborating the proposition of the new species, including a comprehensive account of the distinctive morphological attributes of H. liboense, along with its key distinguishing features from similar species.

Key words

Molecular evidence, morphology, phylogeny, taxonomy

Introduction

Hypericum L. is the largest genus of the family Hypericaceae, with approximately 470 species worldwide (Dauncey et al. 2019), especially in temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere and on tropical high-altitude mountains (Crockett and Robson 2011). In China, the genus is known to include a total of 68 species and nine subspecies, of which 33 species are endemic to the country. About 46 species and four subspecies are abundant in the western and southern regions of China, with few distributed in Xinjiang (Robson 2012). Hypericum plants are mostly herbs or shrubs, less often trees, and the flowers are often yellow or golden and occasionally white. Some species of this genus are cultivated around the world due to ornamental value, while some species have high medicinal value (Galeotti 2017; Bertoli et al. 2018; Marrelli et al. 2020; Revuru et al. 2020; Caldeira et al. 2022; Fang et al. 2023; Luo et al. 2023; Zheng et al. 2023).

The genus Hypericum was originally classified under the family Guttiferae based on morphological studies (Bessey 1915). However, the morphological characteristics of plants grown in different regions vary widely, leading to controversy among scholars regarding the main morphological basis for species identification. The rapid development of molecular technology (ITS), particularly the emergence of molecular marker technology, has provided compelling evidence for the study of classification, genetic relationship and developmental position of many plants (Yu et al. 2022; Deng et al. 2023; Ya et al. 2023), and the construction of phylogenetic trees is widely employed to demonstrate genetic relationships among species in the classification of Hypericum.

The APG IV system (The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group 2016) split the broad Guttiferae family into three families, namely Guttiferae, Hypericaceae, and Calophyllaceae, based on molecular evidence. Furthermore, the family Hypericaceae was divided into three tribes and ten genera (including the genus Hypericum). Robson (1972, 1977, 1985, 1990, 2001, 2006, 2010a, 2010b, 2012, 2016) has provided detailed monographic and molecular phylogenetic assessments of Hypericum and has classified the genus into 36 sections and 469 species. Nürk et al. (2015) utilized ITS sequence to establish the phylogenetic relationships within Hypericum ; their findings demonstrated that sect. Ascyreia was non-monophyletic. It was exhibited as a division into two sects: eastern Ascyreia and western Ascyreia (Meseguer et al. 2013). The completion of the taxonomic part of the Hypericum provides not only a taxonomic baseline and valuable tool for the identification of taxa, but also a rich resource for research into many other aspects of the biology and evolution of the genus. However, relationships between the more complete branches in Hypericum remained unresolved, and the classification problem of Hypericum still needs further in-depth research.

In 2022, we participated in a plant survey in a karst area of the Maolan National Nature Reserve in Guizhou, China, and discovered an unusual specimen of Hypericaceae. After field investigation and collection of specimens, we conducted detailed morphological analyses and realised that the morphological characteristics of this species were similar to those of Hypericum, but there were obvious differences in the leaf and calyx from the species occurring in China. To effectively differentiate species H. liboense from others within the genus Hypericum, this study utilized phylogenetic analysis based on morphological identification and description, combined with ITS sequences. As a result, a conclusion was reached, designating it as a novel species within the realm of scientific understanding.

Material and methods

Phylogenetic analysis

The ITS sequence, a highly reiterated tandem sequence in the nuclear genome, exhibits rapid changes, providing abundant variation and informative sites (Meseguer et al. 2013; Nürk et al. 2015). This sequence also demonstrates the highest level of species resolution accuracy (Chinese Plant Bol Group et al. 2011). In this study, we extracted DNA sequences from fresh leaves of H. liboense, followed by PCR amplification and instrument detection to obtain ITS sequences. A total of 55 Hypericum species were included in the analysis dataset, with ITS sequences obtained from NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). These 55 species represented 34 taxa of the genus Hypericum (Table 1), with 1–10 species selected as representatives for each taxon (Nürk et al. 2013). However, species of sect. Umbraculoides and sect. Thasia were not included in the analysis due to lack of ITS sequence data. Thornea calcicole Standl. & Steyerm was used as the outgroup (Park and Kim 2004).

Table 1.

Information of samples used for phylogenetic inference in this study.

Section number Specie number Species GenBank No. Section
1 1 Hypericum quartinianum A.Rich. HE653603.1 Campylosporus
2 2 Hypericum balearicum L. AY555862.1 Psorophytum
3 3 Hypericum bellum subsp. latisepalum N.Robson HE653426.1 Ascyreia
4 Hypericum calycinum L. HE653431.1
5 Hypericum forrestii (Chittenden) N. Robson HE653476.1
6 Hypericum hookerianum Wight et Arn. KC709450.1
7 Hypericum kouytchense Lévl. FJ694210.1
8 Hypericum lagarocladum N. Robson HE662703.1
9 Hypericum patulum Thunb. ex Murray FJ694214.1
10 Hypericum pseudohenryi N. Robson KC709447.1
11 Hypericum wilsonii N. Robson HE653658.1
12 Hypericum monogynum L. HE653544.1
4 13 Hypericum geminiflorum Hemsl. HM162838.1 Takasagoya
5 14 Hypericum androsaemum L. KC709337.1 Androsaemum
15 Hypericum grandifolium Choisy KC709385.1
16 Hypericum × inodorum Mill. HE653565.1
6 17 Hypericum xylosteifolium N. Robson HE653659.1 Lnodora
7 18 Hypericum przewalskii Maxim. JF976672.1 Roscyna
8 19 Hypericum bupleuroides Griseb. HE653429.1 Bupleuroides
9 20 Hypericum attenuatum Choisy HE662752.1 Hypericum
21 Hypericum kamtschaticum Ledeb. HE653516.1
22 Hypericum perforatum L. JN811136.1
23 Hypericum perforatum subsp. veronense (Schrank) H. Lindb. MN036448.1
24 Hypericum pseudopetiolatum R. Keller AY573002.1
25 Hypericum yezoense Maxim. AY573004.1
10 26 Hypericum concinnum Benth. HE653442.1 Concinna
11 27 Hypericum pseudomaculatum Bush HE653595.1 Graveolentia
12 28 Hypericum sampsonii Hance HE653620.1 Sampsonia
13 29 Hypericum elodeoides Choisy HE653457.1 Elodeoida
14 30 Hypericum monanthemum Hook. f. et Thoms. ex Dyer HE653542.1 Monanthema
15 31 Hypericum polyphyllum Boiss. & Balansa HE662730.1 Olympia
16 32 Hypericum cerastoides (Spach) N.Robson AY555884.1 Campylopus
17 33 Hypericum papillare Boiss. & Heldr. HE653570.1 Origanifolia
18 34 Hypericum barbatum Jacq. FJ694192.1 Drosocarpium
35 Hypericum richeri subsp. grisebachii (Boiss.) Nyman FJ694222.1
36 Hypericum rumeliacum Boiss. HE653616.1
19 37 Hypericum humifusum L. HE653507.1 Oligostema
20 38 Hypericum orientale L. HE653565.1 Crossophyllum
21 39 Hypericum pseudolaeve N.Robson HE653594.1 Hirtella
22 40 Hypericum hirsutum L. HE653500.1 Taeniocarpium
41 Hypericum pulchrum L. FJ694219.1
23 42 Hypericum empetrifolium Willd. HE653464.1 Coridium
24 43 Hypericum hypericoides (L.) Crantz KC709376.1 Myriandra
44 Hypericum kalmianum L. FJ694209.1
45 Hypericum prolificum L. MT551029.1
25 46 Hypericum canariense L. KC709387.1 Webbia
26 47 Hypericum vacciniifolium Hayek & Siehe HE653656.1 Arthrophyllum
27 48 Hypericum pallens Banks & Sol. AY555848.1 Triadenioides
28 49 Hypericum heterophyllum Vent. HE653492.1 Heterophylla
29 50 Hypericum aegypticum subsp. webbii L. KC709380.1 Adenotrias
30 51 Hypericum papuanum Ridl. HE653571.1 Humifusoideum
31 52 Hypericum reflexum L.f. HE662747.1 Adenosepalum
32 53 Hypericum elodes L. FJ694200.1 Elodes
33 54 Hypericum mexicanum L. LT904662.1 Brathys
34 55 Hypericum japonicum Thunb. ex Murray HE653513.1 Trigynobrathys
Outgroup Thornea calcicole Standl. & Steyerm AY573028.1

The sequences were imported into BioEdit 7.0 for manual alignment and sorting, resulting in a refined sequence matrix, which was then exported (Hall 1999). The ITS matrix (Miller et al. 2010) was imported into the CIPRES supercomputer, and the optimal tree model was constructed using the appropriate Bayesian method (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003; Ruchisansakun et al. 2016). The most suitable alternative model for base evolution was chosen based on the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). For the ITS sequence of nuclear genes, the GTR+I+G model was identified as the best model. The successful construction of the phylogenetic tree was achieved by analysing the ITS dataset using Bayesian inference (BI).

Morphology

During the period of 2022–2023, we conducted a field investigation on H. liboense in Maolan National Nature Reserve, Guizhou Province, including photographing its characteristics and collecting seven live specimens. The type specimen is deposited in the Tree Herbaria, College of Forestry, Guizhou University, Huaxi District, Guiyang City, Guizhou Province, China (GZAC, GZAC–LB–0001). The morphological comparison of H. liboense specimens with similar species, such as H. monogynum, was conducted by studying various materials including leaves, flowers, fructus, and branches. This comparison was primarily based on authoritative plant literature, specifically descriptions found in Flora of China (Li et al. 1990) and Flora of Guizhou (Li 1986). Additionally, the identification process involved referencing sample images from the website (http://plants.jstor.org/) and detailed plant morphological descriptions available at Plant Information System (http://www.iplant.cn/). After measuring the traits with Vernier callipers, the data were analysed and compared with those from specimens of similar species. We directly collected fresh leaf materials in the field, placing them into FAA fixation solution.

Results

Phylogenetic analyses indicated that the 34 included taxa of Hypericum formed a well-supported monophyletic group (Fig. 1). Two individuals of the inferred new species from the sites in Libo County were resolved as a strongly-supported monophyletic lineage (PP = 1.00), which further clustered with H. monogynum, H. patulum and H. geminiflorum into a subclade (PP = 0.99). The tree shows that H. liboense is the sister species of H. monogynum, with relatively strong support (PP = 1.00). These two species also showed certain morphological similarities, especially those of the petals, stamens and pistils (Fig. 2; Table 2). H. patulum has the closest relationship to H. liboense and H. monogynum, although with relatively poor support (PP = 0.62), followed by H. geminiflorum (PP = 0.99).

Figure 1. 

Partial Bayesian consensus phylogram based on ITS sequences. Numbers above branches are Bayesian posterior probabilities (The number after the species name represents the section of Hypericum; Table 1).

Figure 2. 

Hypericum liboense A habitat B flower (a) undulating leaf margins C flower anatomy (a) petal (b) stamens (c) pistil (d) calyx (e) anther (f) gland D H. liboense branch with flowers E stylus F veins and glandular points of calyx G leaf blade half-clasping twig H abaxial side of calyx I blade J veins and glands K anatomy of fructus (a) whole fructus (b) longitudinal section of fructus (c) cross-section of fructus

Table 2.

Morphological comparison of Hypericum liboense and similar species.

H. liboense H. monogynum H. kouytchense H. patulum
Petiole Leaves sessile, semi-amplexicaul Leaves sessile or brachy petiolate Leaves petiolate, 0.5–1.5 mm long Leaves petiolate, 0.5–2 mm long
Leaf texture Thickly papery to thinly leathery Thickly papery Thickly papery Thickly papery
Leaf morphology Long elliptical to long circular Oblanceolate or elliptic to long circular Elliptic, lanceolate to ovate or triangular ovate Blade lanceolate or oblong-lanceolate to ovate or oblong-ovate
Leaf margin Slight undulation Flat Flat Flat
Leaf lower epidermis character Greyish white with white powder Light green, not grey Light green, not grey Abaxially rather glaucous
Midvein Midvein raised on both sides of the leaf surface Midvein flat on the leaf surface Midvein flat on the leaf surface Midvein flat on the leaf surface
Main lateral veins 8–15-paired 4–6-paired 3–4-paired 3-paired
Tertiary reticulation Conspicuous, sunken on the leaf surface Not very conspicuous Obscure or invisible Scarcely visible
Inflorescence 1–3-flowered 1–15(–30)-flowered 1–7(–11)-flowered 1–15-flowered
Anther Yellow, glandular Yellow to dark orange, glandular Yellow, glandular Yellow, glandless
Calyx size Elliptic or broad ovate, larger, 10–14×4–6 mm Broad or narrowly elliptic or oblong to lanceolate or oblanceolate, smaller, 4.5–13×1.2–2 mm Oblong-ovate to lanceolate, larger, 7–15×2.5–7 mm Broadly ovate or broadly elliptic or subcircular to oblong-elliptic or obovate-spatulate, 5–10×3.5–7 mm
Calyx margin Margin entire Margin entire Margin entire Margin eroded-denticulate to ciliolate with markedly hyaline margin
Thin veins of calyx Obvious Obscure Obscure Obscure

Discussion

The results of our phylogenetic tree showed that all species of sect. Asian (including H. patulum, H. kouytchense and H. monogynum, etc) clustered together into a single clade with strong support (PP = 1.00), and the results were consistent with previous studies (Nürk et al.2013; Meseguer et al. 2014). In the phylogenetic tree the new species and H. monogynum were placed along with the species of sect. Asian. The phylogenetic trees (ITS; Fig. 2) indicate that H. liboense is a distinct member of Hypericum, and furthermore, support its sister taxon relationship with H. monogynum, thus corroborating the evidence provided by the morphological observations. There are two populations of H. liboense that have been recorded and observed, and we find that the morphological characters of the species present consistency between the two populations, especially with respect to the morphology of leaves, inflorescence, and calyx. H. liboense is similar to H. monogynum in having whole leaf margins, glandular, yellow petals, whole and flat calyx margins, stamen fascicles each with 25–35 stamens, styles united nearly to apices, then out curved free. but differs from H. monogynum in that the leaf edges are wavy (vs. flat), the midvein are raised on both sides (vs. raised on lower epidermis of leaves), the tertiary venation is sunken on both surfaces (vs. surface not sunken), and the abaxial leaf surface are greyish-white (vs. without grey), inflorescences with 1–3 flowers (vs. 1–15(–30) flowers), calyx are elliptic or broad-ovate (vs. broad or narrowly elliptic or oblong to lanceolate or oblanceolate), and veins obvious (vs. obscure), wholly punctiform glands (vs. laminar glands basally lines to streaks). This feature of wavy leaf edges, obvious veins of leaves and calyx, inflorescence 1–3-flowered is crucial for distinguishing H. liboense from H. monogynum and other related species (Table 2), and supports its standing as a separate, and new species. Furthermore, to our knowledge, most calyx of Hypericum species have obscure thin veins; there is also no report of variation in the leaf edges of H. liboense. Therefore, we believe that the wavy leaf edges and distinctly thin veined of calyx are reliable trait for this purpose and that the recognition of H. liboense as a new species is strongly supported (PP = 1.00) by ITS phylogenetic tree.

In recent years, new species of the genus Hypericaceae have been gradually discovered and reported (Ocak et al. 2009; Bacchetta et al. 2010; Tan et al. 2010; Ely and Boldrini 2015; Ely et al. 2015; Marinho et al. 2016; Trigas 2018; Galindon et al. 2021), indicating the important potential role of discovering and documenting new species in enriching regional species diversity and prioritizing conservation efforts in biodiversity hotspots. As time progresses, the discovery of new species is increasingly receiving attention. The discovery location of H. liboense is in the karst landscape-rich area of Guizhou Province, China. The discovery and description of this species further highlight the ability of the karst limestone region to support rich species diversity and endemism, while also providing favourable conditions for the survival of H. liboense. Therefore, conducting a comprehensive investigation and study of the phylogeny and morphology of H. liboense in the karst limestone region of southern China will provide important scientific insights into the plant diversity and the implementation of conservation strategies in this region.

Taxonomy

Hypericum liboense M.T.An & T.R.Wu, sp. nov.

Fig. 2

Type

China, Guizhou Province, Libo County, Maolan National Nature Reserve, elev. 947, 25°16'N, 107°57'E, 21 April 2022, Jian Xu, Mingtai An and Tianrou Wu 220421(Holotype: GZAC–LB–0001, Isotype: GZAC–LB–0002).

Diagnosis

This species is similar to H. monogynum in terms of morphology. The main difference between the two species is that the leaves of H. liboense are sessile and semi-clasped (vs. leaves sessile or brachypetiolate). The leaves of H. liboense are long elliptical to long circular, and the edges are whole and wavy (vs. oblanceolate or elliptic to long circular, flat). H. liboense leaves are thickly papery to thinly leathery (vs. thickly papery), with a white powder on the abaxial side leading to a grey-white appearance (vs. abaxially without grey). Main lateral veins of leaves 8–15 pairs (vs. 4–6 pairs), with the midvein on both sides convex, the main lateral veins obvious branches from the midvein, the main lateral veins and tertiary vein forming an obvious network and obviously sagging (vs. tertiary vein obscure and not sunken). Inflorescences with 1–3 flowers (vs. 1–15(–30) flowers), calyx are elliptic or broad-ovate (vs. broad or narrowly elliptic or oblong to lanceolate or oblanceolate), 10–14 mm long, 4–6 mm wide (vs. 4.5–13 mm long and 1.2–2 mm wide), and veins obvious (vs. obscure) (Table 2).

Description

Plants Erect shrub, 0.5–1.3 m tall. Young branches reddish brown with a light white powder. Old branches dark reddish-brown or grey, cylindrical, with a lumpy rind after cracking off, and the cortex light red. Leaves opposite, sessile, with semi-clasping branchlets. The leaves are long elliptical to long circular, 4–8 cm long and 2–4 cm wide, with the middle entire part of the leaf usually the widest, the apex blunt round, with a fine cusp; leaf blade base cuneate to rounded, margin entire and slightly ruffled; thickly papery to thinly leathery, glabrous, the surface of the leaves green or dark green, the back of the leaves white and greyish-white; the main lateral veins of the leaves in 8–15 pairs, the midvein raised on both sides, and the base reddish; main lateral veins and midvein branching obviously, main lateral veins and tertiary vein forming an obvious network and concave on the leaf surface; wholly punctiform glands. Inflorescence with 1–3 flowers, emanating from the first segment of the stem; peduncle yellow-green, 1.3–3 cm long. Flowers 4–7 cm in diameter; bud ovular, apex subacute. Calyx 5, free, ovate to broadly ovate, 1–1.4 cm long, 0.4–0.6 cm wide, wholly punctiform glands, apex acute to rounded, entire margin, base light green, margin purplish red, midvein and veining obvious, and calyx enlarged in the fruit stage. Petals 5, yellow, without flush, open, triangular obovate, slightly curved, 2.8–3.5 cm long, 1.6–2.2 cm wide, approximately, margin entire, glandular. Stamens in 5 fascicles, each with 23–40 stamens, 1.3–3.4 cm long, several times the length of the petal, anthers yellow to dark orange, with glands. Ovary ovulate or sub-globular, 3–5 mm long, 2.5–5 mm wide. Style 1.3–2.2 cm long, styles partly united (style confluent almost to apex and then curved outwards into 5 splits), stigma small, lavender. Capsule broadly oval-shaped or oval-shaped and conical, 10–14 mm long and 6–10 mm wide, light green, dark brown when ripe.

Phenology

Flowering from April to June; fruiting from June to September.

Distribution and ecology

This species is known to be found only in Libo County, Guizhou Province, China, on the top of a mountain in a karst landscape, alt. 947 m.

Etymology

The species name “liboense” refers to the origin of the type specimen, Libo County, Guizhou Province.

Conservation status

In the 2022–2023 period, we sampled the H. liboense population and found two more sites around the location where the species was first discovered, each with a population of approximately 20 plants. The habitat of H. liboense is mainly from the exposed rock gully area above the middle of the mountain to the top of the mountain. The soil in the plant habitat is poor, the soil layer is weak in its ability to retain water, and drought is common. At present, H. liboense is not known to be distributed in the low-altitude areas below the foot of the mountain and the middle of the mountain, so we hypothesize that the current availability of habitat for H. liboense is relatively poor and the population is relatively endangered. However, because our current investigation of the survival status and threat factors of H. liboense is not sufficiently comprehensive to provide information on the specific distribution of this population, we recommend that H. liboense be classified as “data missing” (IUCN 2017).

Conclusions

According to the morphological characteristics and molecular evidence of Hypericum, the findings indicate that H. liboense should be categorized within sect. Ascyreia. It is evident that H. liboense is a distinct member of Hypericum and forms a strongly supported clade (PP = 1.00) within the Hypericum phylogenetic tree. Moreover, H. liboense exhibits distinct morphological features that differentiate it from all currently accepted species in Hypericum. Therefore, it is deemed necessary to classify H. liboense as a new species.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Kun Wang, Xing-Yong Cui, Xi-Hong Yang and Hong-Fen Hu for their help with species investigation and specimen collection. Thanks to Ling-Bin Yan for his help with photographing the species.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This work was supported by the "Survey and Assessment of Newly Added National Key Protected Wild Plant Resources in Guizhou Province (Second stage) (MCHC–ZD20232020)", "Research on the diversity of Corybas fanjingshanensis mycorrhizal fungi of rare and endangered orchids endemic in Guizhou (QKHJC [2023]1Y235)" and "Investigation and Monitoring Project of Maolan Large-scale Dynamic Plot of Karst Forest Eco-system in South China (2023–23)".

Author contributions

Tian-Rou Wu and Jian Xu completed all the work of this paper together, they contributed equally to this work and are the co-first authors of this paper. Ming-Tai An planned and guided the writing of the whole paper, participated in the field investigation and identification work, acted as the corresponding author of the paper. Jiang-Hong Yu participated in the field investigation and completed part of the data processing and content writing. Feng Liu Collect plant specimens in the field and take photographs for identification. Zheng-Ren Chen participated in field investigation and compared plant specimens to identify species and guide the writing of the paper.

Author ORCIDs

Tian-Rou Wu https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5223-0567

Jian Xu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0714-0917

Ming-Tai An https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3886-0287

Jiang-Hong Yu https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1765-8557

Feng Liu https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7031-4494

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  • Bertoli A, Cirak C, Seyis F (2018) Hypericum spp. volatile profiling and the potential significance in the quality control of new valuable raw material. Microchemical Journal 136: 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2017.01.006
  • Bessey CE (1915) The phylogenetic taxonomy of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 2(1/2): 109–164. https://doi.org/10.2307/2990030
  • Li DZ, Gao LM, Li HT, Wang H, Ge XJ, Liu JQ, Chen ZD, Zhou SL, Chen SL, Yang JB, Fu CX, Zeng CX, Yan HF, Zhu YJ, Sun YS, Chen SY, Zhao L, Wang K, Yang T, Duan GW (2011) Comparative analysis of a large dataset indicates that internal transcribed spacer (ITS) should be incorporated into the core barcode for seed plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108(49): 19641–19646 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1104551108
  • Crockett SL, Robson NKB (2011) Taxonomy and chemotaxonomy of the genus Hypericum. Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Science and Biotechnology 5(1): 1–13.
  • Dauncey EA, Irving JTW, Allkin R (2019) A review of issues of nomenclature and taxonomy of Hypericum perforatum L. and Kew’s Medicinal Plant Names Services. The Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 71(1): 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jphp.12831
  • Fang SL, Xu B, Zhang L, He ZR, Zhou XM (2023) Selaginella densiciliata (subg. Heterostachys, Selaginellaceae), a new spikemoss species from China based on morphological and molecular data. PhytoKeys 227: 135–149. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.227.101222
  • Galeotti N (2017) Hypericum perforatum (St John’s wort) beyond depression: A therapeutic perspective for pain conditions. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 200: 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2017.02.016
  • Galindon JMM, Penneys DS, Lagunday NE, Tandang DN, Coritico FP, Amoroso VB, Fritsch PW (2021) Hypericum perryongii (Hypericaceae), a new species from Philippines. Phytotaxa 478(1): 61–66. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.478.1.4
  • Li YK (1986) Flora of Guizhou (vol. 2), Guizhou People Press, 151–171.
  • Li XW, Li YH, Tong SQ, Tao GD, Zhang PY, Zhang YJ (1990) Flora of China (vol. 50). Science Press, 8–71.
  • Marinho LC, Martins MV, Amorim AMA, Bittrich V (2016) Vismia atlantica (Hypericaceae), a new species previously thought to be well-known from the Brazilian Atlantic forest. The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 143(3): 330–337. https://doi.org/10.3159/TORREY-D-15-00041
  • Meseguer AS, Aldasoro JJ, Sanmartín I (2013) Bayesian inference of phylogeny, morphology and range evolution reveals a complex evolutionary history in St. John’s Wort (Hypericum). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 67(2): 379–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2013.02.007
  • Meseguer AS, Sanmartín I, Marcussen T, Pfeil BE (2014) Utility of low-copy nuclear markers in phylogenetic reconstruction of Hypericum L. (Hypericaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 300(6): 1503–1514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-013-0977-5
  • Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Gateway Computing Environments Workshop 14: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129
  • Nürk NM, Madriñán S, Carine MA, Chase MW, Blattner FR (2013) Molecular phylogenetics and morphological evolution of St. John’s Wort (Hypericum; Hypericaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 66(1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.022
  • Nürk NM, Uribe-Convers S, Gehrke B, Tank DC, Blattner FR (2015) Oligocene niche shift, miocene diversification-cold tolerance and accelerated speciation rates in the St. John’s Worts (Hypericum, Hypericaceae). BMC Evolutionary Biology 15(1): 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0359-4
  • Ocak A, Savaroglu F, Erkara İP, Koyuncu O (2009) Hypericum sechmenii (Hypericaceae), a new species from central Anatolia, Turkey. Annales Botanici Fennici 46(6): 591–594. https://doi.org/10.5735/085.046.0616
  • Park SJ, Kim KJ (2004) Molecular phylogeny of the genus Hypericum (Hypericaceae) from Korea and Japan: Evidence from nuclear rDNA ITS sequence data. Journal of Plant Biology 47(4): 366–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03030553
  • Revuru B, Bálintová M, Henzelyová J, Eva Č, Kusari S (2020) MALDI–HRMS imaging maps the localization of skyrin, the precursor of Hypericin, and pathway intermediates in leaves of Hypericum species. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) 25(17): 3964. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25173964
  • Robson NKB (1977) Studies in the genus Hypericum L. (Guttiferae): 1. Infrageneric classification. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History). Botany 5: 293–355.
  • Robson NKB (1985) Studies in the genus Hypericum L. (Guttiferae): 3. Sections: 1. Campylosporus to: 6a. Umbraculoides. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History). Botany 12: 163–325.
  • Robson NKB (1990) Studies in the genus Hypericum L. (Guttiferae): 8. Sections 29. Brathys (part 2) and 30. Trigynobrathys. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History). Botany 20: 1–150.
  • Robson NKB (2001) Studies in the genus Hypericum L. (Guttiferae) 4(1). section 7. Roscyna to 9. Hypericum sensu lato (part 1). Bulletin of the Natural History Museum Botany Series 31: 37–88. https://doi.org/10.1017/S096804460200004X
  • Robson NKB (2006) Studies in the genus Hypericum L. (Clusiaceae). section 9. Hypericum sensu lato (part 3): Subsection 1. Hypericum series 2. Senanensia, subsection 2. Erecta and section 9b. Graveolentia. Systematics and Biodiversity 4(1): 19–98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1477200005001842
  • Ruchisansakun S, van der Niet T, Janssens SB, Triboun P, Techaprasan J, Jenjittikul T, Suksathan P (2016) Phylogenetic analyses of molecular data and reconstruction of morphological character evolution in Asian Impatiens section Semeiocardium (Balsaminaceae). Systematic Botany 40(4): 1063–1074. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364415X690102
  • The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2016) An update of the angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 181(1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12385
  • Trigas P (2018) A new Hypericum (sect. Drosocarpium, Hypericaceae) from the Cyclades Islands (Greece). Nordic Journal of Botany 36(11): e2205. https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.02205
  • Ya JD, Wang WT, Liu YL, Jiang H, Han ZD, Zhang T, Huang H, Cai J, Li DZ (2023) Five new and noteworthy species of Epidendroideae (Orchidaceae) from southwestern China based on morphological and phylogenetic evidence. PhytoKeys 235: 211–236. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.235.111230
  • Yu JH, Zhang WD, Qin F, Xia CY, Qin Y, An MT, Gadagkar SR, Yu SX (2022) Impatiens yunlingensis (Balsaminaceae), a new species from Yunnan, China. PhytoKeys 212: 13–27. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.212.89347
login to comment