Research Article |
Corresponding author: Try Surya Harapan ( trysuryaharapan@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Norbert Holstein
© 2023 Try Surya Harapan, Wei Harn Tan, Thoriq Alfath Febriamansyah, Nurainas, Syamsuardi, Joeri Sergej Strijk.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Harapan TS, Tan WH, Febriamansyah TA, Nurainas, Syamsuardi, Strijk JS (2023) Lithocarpus tapanuliensis (Fagaceae), a new stone oak from northern Sumatra and its role as an important resource for critically endangered orangutans. PhytoKeys 234: 167-179. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.234.106015
|
A new species of stone oak, Lithocarpus tapanuliensis Harapan, W.H.Tan, Nurainas & Strijk from South Tapanuli, North Sumatra, Indonesia is described. We provide colour photographs, a distribution map and a new IUCN conservation status assessment for inclusion on the global Red List. The unique cupule morphology, particularly the shape, placement and distinctness of the cupule protuberances, are distinctive from other Lithocarpus species in the region. Ecological interactions (e.g. consumption and nesting) with Tapanuli orangutans were recorded in the field.
Batang Toru, Hoteng, Lithocarpus tapanuliensis, Sumatran Fagaceae, Tapanuli orangutan, food habits
The tropical rainforest of Sundaland is one of the most megadiverse regions on the Planet (
Lithocarpus Blume (Stone oaks) is the second largest genus in the Fagaceae family (
South Tapanuli is one of the three forest blocks that make up the Batang Toru Ecosystem and is the last refuge for the recently described, Critically Endangered and extremely rare Tapanuli orangutans (
Holotype. Indonesia, North Sumatra Province, South Tapanuli Regency, Sipirok District, Bulu Mario Village, Pilar Forest (Fig.
Lithocarpus tapanuliensis distinguishes itself from similar species through its presence and placement of unique bullate protuberances covering the cupule and the distinct presence of a narrow ring of small denticulated plates around the rim. It differs from L. elegans (Blume) Hatus. ex Soepadmo with tiny, pointed scale-like appendages, L. confragosus (King ex Hook.f.) A.Camus with close-set warts, L. corneus (Lour.) Rehder with the diamond-like pattern and L. pulcher (King) Markgr. with tuberculate cupules. The cupule of L. tapanuliensis covers almost 3/5 of the nut (in contrast with L. pulcher and L. confragosus, whose cupule encloses almost the entire nut). The surface of the cupule is slightly tomentose and dark brown with distinct protuberances (whereas L. confragosus, L. corneus and L. pulcher lack such because of the absence of lamellae) (Table
Morphological differences between Lithocarpus tapanuliensis sp.nov and other species of Lithocarpus in the surrounding region from literature (
Characters | Lithocarpus tapanuliensis Harapan, W.H. Tan, Nurainas & Strijk | L. confragosus (King ex Hook.f.) A.Camus | L. corneus (Lour.) Rehder | L. luteus Soepadmo | L. elegans (Blume) Hatus. ex Soepadmo | L. pulcher (King) Markgr. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Cupule surface | Up to ⅘ covered with bullate protuberances; upper ⅕ with narrow ring of small denticulated plates. The surface of the cupule is slightly tomentose | Outside irregularly set with rounded to pointed short tubercles. | Outside with triangular to rhomboid bracts, the centre and margin ridged or fused with cupule and ± united into concentric rings. | Woody, tomentose, lamellate; thick, hairy, enclosing up to half of the acorn; lamellae obscure or slightly distinct, edge denticulate, set in 8–10 regular lines. | Adpressed tomentose, scale-like appendages distinct, appressed, woody imbricate, set in regular lines. | Woody, tomentose, covered in distinct sturdy tuberculate, irregularly and densely set on the upper part of cupule, spreading out towards the base. |
2. Nut scar | Concave. | Flat to concave, basal only. | Scar covering ½ to most of nut, convex. | Flat. | Flat to concave, basal only. | Scar covering ¾ of the nut, deeply convex. |
3. Size of acorns (l × w) | 1.9–2.9 cm long, 2.6–3.4 cm in diam. | 1.5–2.5 cm long, 2–4 cm in diam. | 2.5–3.4 cm long, 3.3–4.9 cm in diam. | 1–1.5 cm long, 2–2.5 cm in diam. | 1.5–2.5 cm in length, 1.5–3 cm in diam. | 2–4 cm long, 4–5 cm in diam. |
4. Acorn position | Sessile, solitary along the rachis and spaced. | Sessile or with stalk up to 1 cm. | Sessile, singular or in 2s, 3s or 4s. | Sessile, solitary or more common in clusters. | Sessile or with stalk up to 0.5 cm, solitary. | Sessile, solitary along the rachis. |
5. Nut surface | Sparsely tomentose. | Glabrous, smooth. | Tomentose around the apex. | Densely fulvous to greyish-tomentose. | Glabrous, smooth. | Sparsely tomentose, brown. |
6. Wall; nut covering extent of the cupule. | Free from the cupule; up to half of the nut covered. | For the greater part free from the cupule; enclosing greater part of the nut,except for opening. | Free from the cupule; enclosing ca.½ of the nut. | Free from the cupule; enclosing ca. ⅓ of the nut. | Free from the cupule; enclosing ca. ½ nut. | Mostly adnate to the cupule; enclosing greater part of the nut except for opening. |
7. Nut shape | Obovoid (more flat at the apex) | Depressed, ovoid-globose, top rounded and depressed umbonate at the centre, base truncate | Subglobose to turbinate, apex rounded, flat, or slightly concave | Ovoid to sub hemispherical | Ovoid or depressed ovoid to subglobose, apex rounded | Obconical- hemispherical. Top flat or convex. Base deeply convex |
8. Leaf shape; size (l × w) | Elliptic to oblong, (14) 16–17(20) × (4.7)6–7(8.5) cm, margin entire, apex cuspidate, base attenuate. | Elliptic to oblong, to broadly elliptic, (10–)12–18(–27) × (3.5–)5–7(–10) cm, broadest around the middle line. | Elliptic to oblong, (5–)10–15 × 2–4.5 cm. Base cuneate to subrounded and symmetric or oblique, margin dentate, shallowly undulate, or rarely entire, apex acuminate to acute. | Elliptic to obovate, (7–)9–12 (–15) × (2.5 –) 3.5–5 (–6) cm, broadest at or slightly below the middle, base acute to cuneate, top acute to 1 cm acuminate. | Narrowly to broadly obovate or elliptic, (9–)12–17(–21) × 3–6(–8) cm base acute or cuneate, margin revolute, apex bluntly acute or acuminate. | Broadly elliptic to oblong, (10–) 15–20(–30) × (4–) 6–8(–12.5) cm, base acute to cuneate, margin revolute, apex acute to acuminate. |
A large tree without buttresses, up to 35 m tall. Bark rough, lightly fissured, greyish-green with whitish lenticel. Inner bark is dark red forming longitudinal slits. Twigs diameter 0.2–0.4 cm, smooth, striate, bud imbricate 0.5 mm. Branches dark brown. Leaves simple, underneath tomentose, dark green above and fawn green below when fresh; above, dull greyish-brown, lightly brown when dry. Blade elliptic-oblong, 16.5–20 (L) × 6–8.5 (W) cm; margin entire; apex cuspidate tip; bases attenuate. Petiole: striate, glabrous, 1.3–1.5 cm in length. Venation mid-rib wide, raised on both sides; pinnately veined, secondary venation eucamptodromous. Pairs of secondary nerves 10–11 pairs, raised on the underside. Tertiary veins sub-scalariform. Male and female inflorescences not seen. Peduncles up to 2–4 cm long and between 0.3 and 0.5 cm in diameter. Infructescence rachis diameter 0.4–0.5 cm. Acorn solitary along the rachis and spaced both in immature and mature stages. Cupule solitary and sessile, greenish-brown when fresh, mature cupules cup-shaped covering half of the nut, diameter 2.8–3.4 cm, cupule thickness 2.4–2.8 cm. thick-walled woody, cupule surface irregular, with a narrow ring of small denticulated plates around the rim, rest of cupule covered in distinct bullate protuberance gradually fusing into large tumour-like masses towards the base. Protuberances, specifically the rim, have resin burn marks with blackish shiny colour when dried. Immature cupules thin, cup-shaped covering 80% of the nut, covered in small protuberances ranging from relatively flat lines to bullate. Nut obovoid, length 1.9–2.3 cm, diameter 2.2–2.6 cm, sparsely tomentose around the basal scar, fawn-green when ripe, brownish-grey when dried, basal scar depressed, nut scar diameter 1.6–1.7 cm, thickness 0.3–0.4 cm. Resin leaking on the nuts. Apex flattened obtuse.
Lithocarpus tapanuliensis Harapan, W.H.Tan, Nurainas & Strijk, sp. nov. A fresh fruits from field collection B fresh fruits in the canopy C bark and sapwood D fresh leaves E dried mature and immature infructescence F base of tree next to an animal wallow G cupule- bottom view, top view and nut bottom view and cross-section. Pictures by T.S. Harapan & T.A Febriamansyah, edited by W.H. Tan.
Fruiting was observed in February 2023 with fresh fruits recovered from the tree and from the ground.
During our fieldwork in Pilar Forest, a primary forest near the Bulu Mario District, we recorded two individuals of Lithocarpus tapanuliensis. The lower-montane forest is characterised by the abundance of meranti gunung (Shorea platyclados Slooten ex Endert). Additional Fagaceae species were recorded, namely Lithocarpus javensis Blume, Quercus oidocarpa Korth. and Castanopsis tungurrut (Blume) A.DC. Interactions with Tapanuli orangutans were observed with a nest and remnants of consumed fruits were recorded near the tree (Fig.
Hoteng (Tapanuli language).
The epithet is derived from its type locality, Tapanuli, South Tapanuli District, Sipirok Regency, North Sumatra Province, Indonesia.
Using the guidelines established by the IUCN Red List (
There are an estimated 32 species of Lithocarpus documented in Sumatra (
The flora of Sumatra has garnered more interest over the last decade with a variety of plant species being described, like the iconic rafflesia (
During fieldwork, acorn remains of L. tapanuliensis and C. tungurrut consumed by Tapanuli orangutans were collected (Fig.
An orangutan nest was also observed in a neighbouring tree to L. tapanuliensis (Fig.
We provide an initial IUCN conservation assessment for L. tapanuliensis as Critically Endangered, as only two individuals were recorded in a small section of South Tapanuli, specifically in Pilar Forest (West Block of Batang Toru Ecosystem). The Batang Toru ecosystem suffers from habitat fragmentation and habitat loss due to massive infrastructure projects, such as mining, agroforestry plantations and hydropower in important corridor areas (e.g.
Our findings make an important contribution to the discovery of new Fagaceae species, highlighting the importance of preserving Indonesia’s unique habitats of the Batang Toru landscape. A comprehensive understanding of the species, along with further surveys and spatial distribution analysis, is crucial for protecting against potential extinction. Future strategies must focus on the long-term survival of the species through ex situ conservation in suitable habitats combined with in situ conservation efforts (
We are grateful to Diansyah and Edi for their help in collecting the specimens in the field. We thank Nazifah Rahmi for preparing and digitising the specimens. We thank Ahimsa Campos-Arceiz for comments on the early draft. We sincerely appreciate three anonymous reviewers and subject editor Dr. Norbert Holstein for their constructive comments and insightful suggestions.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
No ethical statement was reported.
The finding was part of the Nurainas’s biodiversity project conducted in North Sumatra supported by Sumatra Rainforest Institute and the Southeast Asia Biodiversity Research Institute (SEABRI; grant #Y4ZK111B01).
TSH conceived the study, conducted the field survey, and wrote first draft of manuscript. WH wrote first draft of the manuscript, revised the manuscript and prepared the figures. TAF photographed the specimens, supported the field survey, and measured the specimens. NN & SS coordinated field survey, commented on the manuscript, and revised the herbaria collection. JSS wrote the first draft of manuscript, commented on, and revised the manuscript.
Try Surya Harapan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6513-0012
Wei Harn Tan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0971-7820
Syamsuardi https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8351-6528
Joeri Sergej Strijk https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1109-7015
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.