Research Article
Print
Research Article
Morphology, taxonomy, biogeography and ecology of Micrasterias foliacea Bailey ex Ralfs (Desmidiales, Zygnematophyceae)
expand article infoAnatoliy Levanets, Sanet Janse van Vuuren
‡ North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
Open Access

Abstract

Micrasterias foliacea (Desmidiales, Zygnematophyceae) is an interesting desmid species as its filamentous life form is quite different from all other species within the genus. Due to the large size of the filaments and cells, accurate species identification is easy. After its original description from Rhode Island (USA) it was recorded from five continents, but no record could be found of its presence in Europe. In this paper a review of the worldwide distribution of M. foliacea (Desmidiales, Zygnematophyceae) is presented, together with notes on the species’ ecology. In addition to its currently known geographical distribution, the paper also records the species’ presence at two new locations in southern Africa, namely Botswana (Okavango River) and Mozambique (Palma, Cabo Delgado). The paper presents a discussion of taxonomical levels of intraspecific taxa, based on morphological characteristics. It is proposed that the taxonomical status of M. foliacea Bailey ex Ralfs f. nodosa should be raised to the variety, as its nodular cell wall thickenings are unique morphological features.

Keywords

Botswana, global distribution, Mozambique, new records, taxonomy

Introduction

The genus Micrasterias C. Agardh ex Ralfs (1848: 48) (Desmidiales, Zygnematophyceae) accounts for 95 currently taxonomically accepted species (Guiry and Guiry 2023), however in AlgaeBase there are more than 900 species and intraspecific names (Guiry and Guiry 2023).

Species of the genus Micrasterias consists mostly of single cells, each divided into two symmetrical semicells which are mirror images of each other. There is only one filamentous species within the genus, namely Micrasterias foliacea Bailey ex Ralfs. This species was initially described from Rhode Island (United States of America) in a letter from Prof. J.W. Bailey addressed to John Ralfs in 1847, and it was published and illustrated by the latter in the British Desmidieae (Ralfs 1848: 210).

At later stages M. foliacea was also recorded in Asia (Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Myanmar, Nepal, Papua New Guinea, Pakistan, Philippines, Russia, Singapore, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam), North America (Canada, USA), Central America (Cuba, Nicaragua, Panama) and South America (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Suriname, Venezuela), Australia and Africa. Currently, this species is known from 17 countries on the African continent, mostly from tropical central Africa (Benin, Cameroon, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Tanzania), Madagascar, and southern Africa (Botswana, Mozambique, South Africa, Zambia, Zimbabwe).

In addition to the type species, several forms and varieties were described from tropical regions of Asia and two from South America based on cell dimensions and morphology (ornamentation, size and position of the spines, cell wall thickenings).

In this paper we report on the presence of this species in two new locations in southern Africa, namely the Okavango River in Botswana and a wetland in northern Mozambique.

Material and methods

In Botswana grab samples were collected in the Okavango River near Shakawe during January 2015. The samples were fixed with 10% ethanol to preserve the algae. The water lily, genus Nymphaea L., dominated at the sampling site during sampling.

In Mozambique samples were collected during October 2011 near Palma, Cabo Delgado, just south of the Tanzanian border. Water samples were collected from seven sites in an inland wetland system with soft black peat-like sediment. All samples were preserved with 10% ethanol. The samples in which M. foliacea were found were deposited in the North-West University Diatom Collection and Herbarium (sample no. 12-140, 12-142 and 12-436).

The samples were examined using a Leica DM2500 LED compound microscope equipped with phase contrast objectives and a Flexacam C3 microscope digital camera.

An investigation of all scientific literature, phycological inventories, technical reports and internet databases (Atlas of Living Australia 2022; Guiry and Guiry 2023; The Global Biodiversity Information Facility 2023) was carried out to account for all existing records of M. foliacea, including intraspecific names and nomenclatural synonyms. Where possible, the citation, along with geographical locations and ecological characteristics of the habitats, was recorded. A desktop study of all published scientific literature, mentioning the ecology of the species, was also made to determine its ecological preferences.

Results and discussion

In the following paragraphs the taxonomy, morphology, geographical distribution, habitat and ecology of the different varieties of M. foliacea will be discussed.

Micrasterias foliacea [var. foliacea] Bailey ex Ralfs, 1848

Micrasterias foliacea [var. foliacea] Bailey ex Ralfs, 1848. “The British Desmidiaceae”: 210, tab. 35, fig. 3.

Synonyms

M. foliacea Bailey in lit. cum icone 1847; M. foliacea Bailey ex Ralfs f. α typica Turner, 1892. “Algae Aquae Dulcis Indiae Orientalis”: 94, tab. 6, figs 12–14; M. foliacea Bailey ex Ralfs var. granulifera J.A. Cushman, 1908. “Rhodora” 10(114): 111.

The earliest description of M. foliacea var. granulifera by Cushman (1908) is doubtful, and no drawings or micrographs were provided. Cushman (1908) indicated that var. granulifera is similar to the type, but in addition the surface is covered with large irregularly disposed granules. Later, Krieger (1939) classified this variety as a synonym of the type variety, which is currently accepted.

Morphology

Fig. 1 illustrates the morphology of M. foliacea var. foliacea found in the Mozambique samples. It is the only species of Micrasterias where the cells are permanently attached to each other to form a ribbon-like chain, which may consist of 2–100 cells. The cells are nearly square (sub-quadrate) with deep constrictions at the sinus. Each semicell is sub-divided into three lobes, two of which are lateral and the third apical (polar). The lateral lobes are further sub-divided into smaller lobes and lobules by means of incisions of various depths. The polar lobes are narrow with a pair of pointed extensions at each end. The polar extensions interlock where neighbouring cells are attached to each other. The cells are 70–80 µm in length and 65–80 µm wide (isthmus 13–16 µm). The morphology of specimens in our samples corresponds to the original description by Ralfs (1848) and later descriptions, such as those provided by Kim (2013) and Ribeiro et al. (2015).

Figure 1. 

Morphology of M. foliacea var. foliacea found in samples from Mozambique A six cells illustrating chain formation B two adjacent cells indicating the interlocking polar extensions C morphology of a single cell. Scale bars: 30 µm.

A description of Ling and Taylor (2000) of a form of M. foliacea recorded from the Northern Territories in Australia indicated a simpler form with less divided lateral lobes and one, instead of the usual two, triangular process on the face of the polar lobe. Cell length without processes was 66–67 μm, and with processes 91–95 μm; width was 102–109 μm; apex 38–43 μm and isthmus 14–15 μm.

Distribution

A map, illustrating the geographical distribution of M. foliacea, is presented in Fig. 2. This figure shows that variety foliacea (type) is widely distributed, being present on most continents. It is, however, only recorded from the eastern side of North America and, surprisingly, it is completely absent from European countries. Palamar-Mordvintseva (1984) speculated that this species can possibly be found in future in the rice fields of southern Ukraine, but according to the general known distribution of this species it is doubtful that this statement is true. A detailed list, with references, of all localities where this variety was found is presented in Suppl. material 1.

Figure 2. 

Worldwide distribution of different varieties of Micrasterias foliacea.

Habitat and ecology

From intensive literature searches it is clear that the habitats of free-living M. foliacea are exceptionally diverse. It can be found in plankton and periphyton of a variety of different lentic and lotic water bodies. Lentic (stagnant) water bodies include wetlands, marshes, various types of swamps (e.g., peat swamps) and ponds (including irrigation and oxidation ponds, rainwater ponds, rock ponds, fishponds, and small ponds in botanical gardens), reservoirs, deltas, floodplains, lagoons and lakes (including crater lakes), flooded savannahs and meadows, and in ditches associated with paddy (rice) fields. It is most common in small and shallow (<1 to 2 m) ponds, but it was also occasionally found at the embankments of larger standing water bodies, e.g., Lake Laguna de Bay in the Philippines (4–6 m deep; Behre 1956). Lotic habitats include cobbles, streams, rivers, and irrigation canals. In addition, it was also recorded from a tropical estuarine mangrove swamp in Nigeria with high conductivity levels (Table 1; Ubong et al. 2017). In these habitats, it often occurs between floating algal masses. In terrestrial habitats it may be found amongst moist mosses, growing on the surface of rocks, or inhabiting wet soils.

Table 1.

Physico-chemical properties of waterbodies throughout the world in which M. foliacea var. foliacea was found.

Environmental variable Value/Ranges Country Reference
pH 6.6 Cambodia Hirano 1972
4.7–5.3 Malaysia Ratnasabapathy and Kumano 1974
5.78±0.76, 6.10±0.44, 6.12±0.74 Malaysia Noor et al. 2012
8.0 Philippines Behre 1956
5.0–5.5 Sumatra Scott and Prescott 1961
6.3–6.8 Russia Gontcharov 1997
5.6–7.5 South Korea Kim 2014
5.6, 5.9 Thailand Ngearnpat et al. 2008
7.42±0.11 Thailand Prasertsin and Peerepornpisal 2018
7.6–8.3 India Ecology and biodiversity of Lower Ganga River basin 2012
6.5–7.0 India Kalita et al. 2016,
5.7–6.8 (open water), 5.2 (littoral vegetation) Zambia Thomasson 1966
6.3 Congo Van Oye 1953
8.0 Nigeria Ubong et al. 2017
6.2 South Africa Claassen 1982
8.15 Nigeria Ali et al. 2016
6.0 India Das and Keshri 2013, 2016
6.44 Botswana Williamson and Marazzi 2013
5.7, 8.1 USA Oyadomari 2013
5.4 Brazil Thomasson 1977
5.5 Suriname Leentvaar 1975
5.26–5.83 Australia Thomasson 1986
6.8–7.2 USA Ngo et al. 1986–1987
Water temperature (°C) 26.8 Cambodia Hirano 1972
23.8–26.9 (running water) 23.4–33.4 (still water) Malaysia Ratnasabapathy and Kumano 1974
27.01±4.2, 27.22±3.96, 27.33±4.87 Malaysia Noor et al. 2012
8, 10, 21 India Das and Keshri 2016
22–26 Russia Gontcharov 1997
29.1, 32.2 Thailand Ngearnpat et al. 2008
30±0.71 Thailand Prasertsin and Peerepornpisal 2018
18.6–30.4 India Ecology and biodiversity of Lower Ganga River basin 2012
17.8–30.2 India Kalita et al. 2016
35 Guinea Bourrelly 1975
23–24 USA Oyadomari 2013
28.5–31.1 Australia Thomasson 1986
10 India Das and Keshri 2013
21.6 Botswana Williamson and Marazzi 2013
33.46 Nigeria Ali et al. 2016
26.17 Nigeria Ubong et al. 2017
Conductivity (μS/cm) 31.88±17, 33.88±12, 34.75±19 Malaysia Noor et al. 2012
36–55, 44–108 South Korea Kim 2014
315, 327 Thailand Ngearnpat et al. 2008
15, 6 USA Oyadomari 2013
23–58 Australia Thomasson 1986
76.0 Botswana Williamson and Marazzi 2013
74.34 Nigeria Ali et al. 2016
49993.33 ± 634.09 Nigeria Ubong et al. 2017
94.80±2.39 Thailand Prasertsin and Peerepornpisal 2018
Dissolved oxygen (mg/L) 2.35±2.62, 3.16±2.22, 3.44±2.76 Malaysia Noor et al. 2012
4.2, 8.0 Thailand Ngearnpat et al. 2008
3.69–6.67 Australia Thomasson 1986
1.70 Botswana Williamson and Marazzi 2013
5.74 Nigeria Ali et al. 2016
6.12 Nigeria Ubong et al. 2017
7.10±0.79 Thailand Prasertsin and Peerepornpisal 2018
Alkalinity (meq/L) 0.038–0.082 Australia Thomasson 1986
2.53 Nigeria Ali et al. 2016
149.00±2.65 Thailand Prasertsin and Peerepornpisal 2018
Total alkalinity (mg/L) 11, 11.5 Thailand Ngearnpat et al. 2008
Phosphate-phosphorus (mg/L) 0.13±0.28 0.15±0.39 0.18±0.45 Malaysia Noor et al. 2012
0.66 Nigeria Ali et al. 2016
Soluble Reactive Phosphate (mg/L) 0.52±0.28 Thailand Prasertsin and Peerepornpisal 2018
Nitrate-nitrogen (mg/L) 0.15±0.1 0.15±0.2 0.18±0.2 Malaysia Noor et al. 2012
12.63 Nigeria Ali et al. 2016
Turbidity (NTU) 1.6 Botswana Williamson and Marazzi 2013
0.46 Nigeria Ali et al. 2016
25.55 Nigeria Ubong et al. 2017
8.07±1.7 Thailand Prasertsin and Peerepornpisal 2018

Besides being free-living, it can also be found as epiphytes on aquatic plants (Jena and Adhikary 2011). It is frequently found living on Utricularia species, such as U. flexuosa (Lütkemüller 1900; Turner 1892) and U. fasciculata (Turner 1892). It was also found on leaves of Hymenachne amplexicaulis (Salazár Pereira 1991; Salazar 2006/2007) and the stems and roots of submerged Ipomaea reptans (Bourrelly 1975). It was common in samples that were obtained when the roots of Eichhornia crassipes, Pistia stratiotes, Salvinia molesta and submerged aquatic macrophytes were squeezed out (Bicudo and Sormus 1982; Rai et al. 2008; Paudel 2017). The species was also found in the stomachs of catfish Synodontis schall and S. nigrita (Lalèyè et al. 2006).

A variety of aquatic plants inhabit waters in which M. foliacea var. foliacea was found. Shallow water was often dominated by species of Nymphaea and Utricularia (Schumacher 1956; Thomasson 1966; Ratnasabapathy and Kumano 1974; Turner 1892; González 2009). Other dominant species include those of Pistia and Salvinia (Ngearnpat et al. 2008; González 2009). In deeper waters Brasenia schreberi, Cabomba caroliniana, Nuphar orbiculata, Nymphaea odorata and Utricularia purpurea were common (Schumacher 1956). During the current study Nymphaea dominated the macrophyte community at the sampling site in Botswana.

The abundance of M. foliacea var. foliacea may range from extremely rare, present in low to moderate quantities (Behre 1956) or it may be common (Scott and Prescott 1961; Prowse 1969; Kadiri and Opute 1989; Kadiri 2002; Islam and Ifranullah 2006). Other authors described it as abundant (Kim 2014), or sometimes dominant (Medvedeva 2007; Ekhator et al. 2013).

Variety foliacea can be found in a wide pH range and a literature overview, presented in Table 1, shows that it is present in both acidic (min pH 4.7; Malaysia), as well as alkaline waters (max pH 8.3; India). Results from the literature review contradict a finding made by Prescott and Scott (1943) who stated that the acidity of water in which M. foliacea grows, varies between pH 5.8 and 6.4 (rarely as high as 6.8), and that this species’ distribution is so specifically related to the chemistry of the water that it can be used as an indicator organism for soft and highly acid waters. After the study of Prescott and Scott (1943) the species was frequently recorded in waters with pH values around 8 (Philippines, India, Nigeria, USA; see Table 1), indicating that it can also tolerate and thrive in alkaline waters and that it is thus not suitable as an indicator organism. Table 1 also indicates alkalinity ranges of water in which the species was recorded and, in accordance with the findings of Förster (1982), several published results show that it is usually found under neutral to alkaline conditions.

It was found in both winter (Islam and Ifranullah 2006) and summer (Thomas et al. 2003; Prasertsin and Peerapornpisal 2018) seasons throughout the world. In India it was found during pre-monsoon, monsoon, post-monsoon and winter seasons (Kalita et al. 2016). Water temperature ranged between a minimum of 8 °C (India) and a maximum of 35 °C (Guinea), although it was most frequently recorded in moderate to high water temperatures, ranging from 23–27 °C (Table 1).

Typical conductivity levels of freshwater are below 1 500 µS/cm, while typical sea water has a conductivity value of about 50 000 µS/cm. M. foliacea was usually found in freshwater with relatively low conductivity values (< 327 µS/cm; Table 1), but cells were also found in some estuaries, archipelagos and marine waters (Chung et al. 1965; McAlice 1975; Opute 1992; Kadiri 2002; Li et al. 2011; Ecology and biodiversity of Lower Ganga River basin 2012; Silveira 2012; Opute and Kadiri 2013; Dayala et al. 2014; Mama et al. 2016; Ubong et al. 2017). Average conductivity values in the tropical estuarine mangrove swamp (Nigeria) in which it was found by Ubong et al. (2017) was in the order of 50 000 μS/cm, showing its ability to survive in saline water. It is, however, suspected that its presence in estuaries and oceans may be the result of outflows from the rivers.

Table 1 shows nutrient ranges (phosphate-phosphorus, nitrate-nitrogen) of water in which M. foliacea was recorded. Based on these nutrient concentrations, it was mostly found in oligotrophic to slightly mesotrophic water (Kim 2014; Ali et al. 2016).

Dissolved oxygen concentrations ranged from 1.7–8.0 mg/L in water in which M. foliacea was recorded. It was mostly found in low turbidity (high transparency) waters (Williamson and Marazzi 2013; Ali et al. 2016; Ubong et al. 2017; Prasertsin and Peerapornpisal 2018). However, in Thailand it was found in muddy, pale yellow-brown water with transparencies less than 1 m (Hirano 1975) and in the middle reaches of the Niger River in Mali it was found in polluted, cloudy, muddy water having a sandy substrate (Couté and Rousselin 1975).

Micrasterias foliacea var. elongata (W.B. Turner) Willi Krieger, 1939

Micrasterias foliacea var. elongata (W.B. Turner) Willi Krieger, 1939. “Rabenhorst’s Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland”, “Österreich und der Schweiz”, 2 Aufl., 13 (Abt.1, Teil 2): 77.

Synonyms

M. foliacea Bailey ex Ralfs var. β Wallich, 1860. “Annals and Magazine of Natural History” Series 3, 5: 280, tab. XIV, figs 1–4; M. foliacea Bailey ex Ralfs f. β elongata Turner, 1892. “Aquae Dulcis Indiae Orientalis”: 94.

This variety was originally described by Wallich (1860) as “var. β”. A later study by Turner (1892) revealed the same alga, but he described it as “forma β elongata”. In his monograph, Krieger (1939) indicated the same algal species as “var. elongata Turner”.

Morphology

The prominent feature of M. foliacea var. elongata is the largely developed, triangular terminal lobe, with an outward directed base, emarginate at its angles and centre and furnished with two short stout teeth placed obliquely to each other (comparable to that of M. baileyi). The central emargination of this lobe is deep and rectangular and the entire lobe projects very slightly beyond the apices of the lateral lobes. The margins of the filament are parallel and direct, the fronds tabular, and divided by a very deep constriction into two dichotomously incised segments, the ultimate subdivisions of which are emarginate. In the Bengal variety, the teeth-like projections next to the terminal lobe are acutely angular, instead of being rounded and, as in the case of Onychonema, the projecting processes, by which cohesion is either secured or increased, overlap each other alternately in adjacent fronds. The cell length is 85–90 μm, width 70–75 μm, width of isthmus 11–13 μm, width of apex 32 μm, width of polar lobes 15 μm (Wallich 1860; Turner 1892).

Distribution

This variety seems to be endemic to southeastern tropical Asia (Lower Bengal, India; Fig. 2 and Suppl. material 2), where it was found in the 1800’s by Wallich (Wallich 1860). A single record of this variety from Sierra Leone (Woodhead and Tweed 1958; Suppl. material 2) is doubtful, because descriptions and illustrations of the cell morphology, as well as information about the sampling site, are absent.

Habitat and ecology

No information is available in the literature about the habitats or ecology of this variety.

Micrasterias foliacea var. multiornata Zalocar de Domitrovic, 1981

Micrasterias foliacea var. multiornata Zalocar de Domitrovic, 1981. “Physis (Buenos Aires)”, Sec.B, 40(98): 58, fig. 2: 13.

Morphology

This variety differs from the type by the presence and distribution of warts, situated in a row from the isthmus to half the length of the sinus. There is also a wart on the basis of the upper side lobes. Cells are 120–124 μm long, 115–120 μm wide, polar lobes are 53–57 μm wide, isthmus is 20–22 μm wide (Zalocar de Domitrovic 1981).

Distribution

The variety is endemic to South America and was only found in tropical areas of Argentina (Fig. 2 and Suppl. material 2 for more information).

Habitat and ecology

M. foliacea var. multiornata was found in a wetland for which no ecological data is available.

Micrasterias foliacea var. nodosa (Behre) Levanets & Janse van Vuuren, stat. nov.

M. foliacea f. nodosa Behre 1956. “Archiv für Hydrobiologie / Supplement” 23: 84, Pl. 10, fig. 5, Basionym.

Taxon depository

PhycoBank registration: http://phycobank.org/103725.

Nodular cell wall thickenings are unique morphological features of this variety and therefore it is proposed to raise taxonomical status of this form to the variety.

Morphology

This taxon was described by Karl Behre (1956) as “forma nodosa” based on cell morphology – it differs from the type by the presence of nodular wall thickenings. Usually, thickenings are located on the inner corners and opposed points of adjacent lobes. Sometimes adjacent lobes are connected by ridge-like thickenings. It was noted that this variety is not a teratological form, because similar wall thickenings were found in numerous cells collected in several sites. Also, no transitional forms were seen between the nodular and the typical forms and the two forms occurred side by side in some samples. Dimensions: 70–74 x 80 μm, isthmus 16 μm.

Distribution

Variety nodosa was rarely encountered, and only recorded from a few islands in Indonesia and the Philippines (southeastern Asia; Fig. 2 and Suppl. material 2 for more information).

Habitat and ecology

In all cases M. foliacea var. nodosa were found in lake environments. In the Philippines the water bodies were characterized by clear water, covered by plants, containing detritus and other remains of higher plants. In Indonesia it was recorded from a crater lake (Suppl. material 2). No data on physico-chemical environmental variables was present for these water bodies.

M. foliacea var. nurulislamii Levanets & Janse van Vuuren, 2023: 1, no fig.

Micrasterias foliacea var. spinosa Islam & Ashrafi, nom. inval. 2004. “Bangladesh Journal of Plant Taxonomy” 6, Pl. 3, figs 12–14. Basionym.

Remarks

Islam and Begum (2004) published a paper on Micrasterias Agardh from selected areas of Bangladesh and described a new variety of M. foliacea (var. spinosa). This varietal designation was invalid and was not designated in accordance with Art. 40.6 of ICN (Turland et al. 2018). In addition, the varietal name “Micrasterias foliacea var. spinosa Islam & Ashrafi” was invalid as Micrasterias foliacea var. spinosa Levanets and Guiry (2021) had priority. A new name, in honor of National Professor of Bangladesh, Abul Khayer Mohammed Nurul Islam, was therefore proposed for this variety (Levanets and Janse van Vuuren 2023).

Morphology

This variety differs from the type because there are numerous spines on the cell wall. The cell wall is covered with many stout, curved spines, unequal in size. The incision between the lobes is usually wide open. Cell length 33–76 μm, width 34.5–77 μm, isthmus 5.0–11.5 μm (Islam and Begum 2004).

Distribution

M. foliacea var. nurulislamii was found only once in Bangladesh (Suppl. material 2).

Habitat and ecology

It was found in a ditch. No ecological information is available.

Micrasterias foliacea var. ornata Nordstedt, 1869

Micrasterias foliacea var. ornata Nordstedt, 1869. “Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra den Naturhistorisk Forening i Kjøbenhavn for Aaret” 21: 221, Taf. 2, fig. 16.

Morphology

Each semicell is rectangular and the cell wall bears one to three small spines along the sinus, as well as on the upper margin of the upper lateral lobe near its base and the lower margin of the lower lateral lobes near the isthmus (Kim 2013, 2014). The presence of the spines on the upper and lower margins of the lateral lobes, as well as the incision which separates the polar lobe, is regarded as the major difference between this variety and the type (Nordstedt 1869; Zalocar de Domitrovic 1981).

In Asian specimens of both the specific form and var. ornata a peculiar phenomenon, never seen in any American specimens, was observed. This is a warping of the surface of the filament, resulting in the twisting of the side (edge) view of the chains into a sinusoidal curve which is sometimes quite pronounced. It is caused by the curving and dishing in opposite directions of the right and left lateral lobes of one semicell, those of the other semicell being curved and dished in the reverse manner (Scott and Prescott 1961). Illustrations of these twisting of the chains can be found in Scott and Prescott (1961).

Distribution

Although variety ornata is less widespread than var. foliacea, it is also widely distributed throughout the world. Similar to the type, it was not recorded anywhere in Europe and in North America it was only recorded from northwestern Canada and two eastern states of the USA. It is more abundant in South America, Africa, and Asia and it was also recorded from Australia. The distribution of var. ornata is illustrated in Fig. 2 and more details regarding its patterns of distribution are presented in Suppl. material 3.

Habitat and ecology

Variety ornata was recorded from a wide range of different ecological niches – it was found in different types of freshwaters, both standing (rainwater pools, rock ponds, rice fields, reservoirs, lakes, swamps, wetlands, flooded savannahs and lagoons) and flowing (creeks, moderate to rapidly flowing rivers). It was growing on the leaves of Hymenachne amplexicaulis (Poaceae) by Salazár Pereira (1991) and Salazar (2006/2007). It was also found in a coastal area in Nigeria (Kadiri 2002).

According to Kim (2013) this variety occurs mostly in oligo-mesotrophic, neutral-alkaline water bodies. The variety had a rare abundance in a natural oligotrophic pond on Jeju Island (South Korea), with pH ranging between 6.1 and 7.5 and conductivity between 44 and 108 μS/cm (Kim 2014). In Venezuela it was found in a flooded savannah which was acidic, with a low salinity and a high biomass of macrophytes (Salazár Pereira 1991; Salazar 2006/2007).

M. foliacea var. quadrinflata Scott & Prescott, 1961

M. foliacea var. quadrinflata Scott & Prescott, 1961. “Hydrobiologia” 17(1–2): 48, Pl. 15, figs 5–8.

Morphology

M. foliacea var. quadrinflata differs from the type in having two large, prominent semi-ellipsoidal hollow swellings at the base of the lateral lobes, each bearing a long spine at the narrow ends. In addition, there may or may not be, four other long spines on each semicell, two adjacent to each of the swellings. Cells are 69–72 μm long and 63–72 μm wide. The isthmus is 12 μm wide and the teeth are 15–18 μm long (Scott and Prescott 1961).

Distribution

The distribution of this variety is plotted in Fig. 2 (with more detailed information in Suppl. material 2). It is limited to the Hindustan and Indochina peninsulas and Indonesian archipelago and was recorded from India, Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand.

Habitats and ecology

Variety quadrinflata was found in freshwater lakes, rivers, reservoirs, swamps and wetlands (India, Indonesia and Malaysia), as well as in a rice paddy field in Thailand.

In Malaysia, the shallow parts and edges of the Tasek Bera swamp lake were covered with Lepironia articulata associations. Aquatic plants such as Utricularia spp., Hydrilla sp., Nymphoides indica and Pandanus helicopus were present in still water areas, while Utricularia sp., Cryptocoryne griffithii, Scirpus confervoides and Pandanus helicopus were present in running water (Ratnasabapathy and Kumano 1974). At the time of sampling the temperatures ranged between 23.4 and 33.4 °C (in still water) and between 23.8 and 26.9 °C (in running water) and the pH ranged between 4.7 and 5.3 Ratnasabapathy and Kumano 1974). In South Sumatra it was also found in acidic waters in Lebak Danau (pH between 5.0 and 5.5; Scott and Prescott 1961).

M. foliacea var. spinosa G.A. Prowse ex Levanets & Guiry, 2021: 2.

Micrasterias foliacea var. spinosa G.A. Prowse, nom. inval. 1969. “Gardens’ Bulletin”, Singapore 24: 341, Pl. 4, text-fig. 2(a). Basionym.

Morphology

The variety differs from all other forms because the isthmus is widely opened and due to the large width of the gap between the subterminal and terminal lobes. Pairs of prominent sharp teeth are borne on either side of the isthmus and on both sides of the base of terminal lobes. Cells 72–75 μm long., 68–70 μm wide, isthmus 8 μm wide (Prowse 1969).

Distribution

Its current known distribution is limited to only one location in the Malayan peninsula (Suppl. material 2 and Fig. 2).

Habitat and ecology

Variety spinosa was commonly found, together with var. quadrinflata, in the Tasek Bera forest swamp lake for which ecological conditions are described in the paragraph on var. quadrinflora above.

Conclusions

Chain forming cells of M. foliacea were found in water samples from Botswana and Mozambique. The morphology of cells of M. foliacea found in these samples corresponded to that given in earlier descriptions of the type species. The species is easily distinguished from other species of the genus by its peculiar apex, interlocking the cells to form chains of up to more than 100 cells. Research on this species resulted in a review of the taxonomy, morphology, worldwide distribution, and ecology of the different varieties of M. foliacea, presented in this paper.

During research on the species, it was noted that doubtful records exist for different varieties of M. foliacea, mainly as a result of the lack of drawings (or micrographs) and new description of previously described varieties. This paper attempted to correct these mistakes and a new status is proposed, namely:

  • Micrasterias foliacea var. nodosa (Behre) Levanets et Janse van Vuuren, stat. nov. – It is proposed to raise the taxonomical status of this form, described by Behre as M. foliacea Bailey ex Ralfs f. nodosa, to the variety, as its nodular cell wall thickenings are unique morphological features.

Detailed analysis of the distribution of M. foliacea and its varieties presented an interesting and clear picture, collated in a distribution map. Despite the wide geographical distribution of varieties foliacea (type) and ornata, they are completely absent from Europe and the majority of North America; both these varieties were only recorded from the eastern side of the latter continent. During this study M. foliacea var. foliacea was observed in two new locations in southern Africa, namely Botswana and northern Mozambique. In general, most other varieties (elongata, nodosa, spinosa, nurulislamii and quadrinflata) are much more limited regarding their distribution and were observed and recorded mostly from southeastern tropical Asia (e.g., Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines). Only var. multiornata is endemic to tropical South America.

A review on physico-chemisty of waterbodies in which M. foliacea was found, indicated that it may be present in a variety of different types of habitats in both standing and flowing water. It can tolerate a wide range of water temperature and pH. It was found in both acidic, neutral and alkaline waters all over the world. Conductivity values measured in waterbodies containing M. foliacea indicated that it is mostly prevalent in fresh waters and findings in estuaries and oceans may be coincidental as the result of washout during runoff. This species occurs mostly in oligo-mesotrophic conditions under conditions of relatively low turbidity.

Acknowledgements

Thank you to Prof. Louis du Preez (North-West University, South Africa) for samples collected in Okavango Delta (Botswana) and Prof. Jonathan Taylor (North-West University, South Africa) for providing samples from Northern Mozambique. The authors would also like to thank Yolanda Zalocar de Domitrovic (Centro de Ecología Aplicada del Litoral (CONICET), Argentina), Ms. Lara Jakson (University of Toronto, Canada) and Dr. Olaf Polmann (SCENSO – Scientific Environmental Solutions, Germany) for help with obtaining rare and old literature inaccessible in South Africa. A special thank you to the reviewers for their positive and useful comments – they really walked the extra mile to improve the quality of the paper.

References

  • Ali AD, Abiem I, Alisha EB, Musa PJ (2016) Floristic Composition of soft-bodied Algae of Pandam Lake (Pandam Wildlife Park, Nigeria). International Journal of Pure & Applied Bioscience 4(4): 39–49. https://doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.2328
  • Atlas of Living Australia (2022) Atlas of Living Australia. http://www.ala.org.au/ [Accessed 20 January 2022]
  • Behre K (1956) Die Süβwasser-Algen der Wallacea-Expedition (ohne die Diatomeen und Peridineen). Archiv für Hydrobiologie Supplement 23(1): 1–104.
  • Bicudo CEM, Sormus L (1982) Desmidioflórula paulista, 2: Gênero Micrasterias C. Agardh ex Ralfs. Bibliotheca Phycologica 57: 1–230.
  • Bourrelly P (1975) Quelques algues d’eau douce de Guinée. Bulletin du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 3e série, n.276, 20: 1–72.
  • Chung YH, Shim JH, Lee MJ (1965) A study on the microflora of the Han River. 1. The phytoplanktons and the effect of the marine water in the lower course of the Han River. Korean Journal of Botany 8(4): 7–29. [In Korean]
  • Claassen MI (1982) ‘n Taksonomiese studie van Transvaalse varswater Euglenophyceae en Chlorophyceae. PhD Thesis, University of Pretoria, South Africa. [In Afrikaans]
  • Couté A, Rousselin G (1975) Contribution à l’étude des algues d’eau douce du Moyen Niger (Mali). Bulletin du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 3e série, n.277, 21: 73–175.
  • Cushman JA (1908) A synopsis of the New England species of Micrasterias. Rhodora 10(114): 97–111.
  • Das D, Keshri JP (2013) Desmids from South Sikkim, India. Nelumbo 55: 172–180.
  • Das D, Keshri JP (2016) Desmids of Eastern Himalaya. J. Cramer in Borntraeger Science Publishers, Stuttgart: 1–260. Bibliotheca Phycologica: e119.
  • Dayala VT, Salas PM, Sujatha CH (2014) Spatial and seasonal variations of phytoplankton species and their relationship to physicochemical variables in the Cochin estuarine waters, Southwest coast of India. Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Sciences 43(6): 937–947.
  • Ecology and biodiversity of Lower Ganga River basin (2012) Ganga river basin environment management plan, indian institutes of technology. Report Code: 026_GBP_IIT_ENB_DAT_04_Ver_Jun 2012: 1–48.
  • Förster K (1982) Conjugatophyceae, Zygnematales und Desmidiales (excl. Zygnemataceae). In: Huber-Pestalozzi G (Ed.) Das Phytoplankton des Süβwassers. Systematik und Biologie. 8. Teil, 1. Hälfe. (Die Binnengewässer, Band XVI). E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, 543 pp.
  • Gontcharov AA (1997) Contribution to the desmid flora of the Primorsky Territory, Russia. Bulletin of National Science Museum, Ser. B. , Tokyo 23(2): 59–80.
  • González AC (2009) Catálogo de las Algas y Cianoprocariotas Dulciacuícolas de Cuba. Impreso en Universidad de Cienfuegos, Cuba, 147 pp.
  • Guiry MD, Guiry GM (2023) AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. http://www.algaebase.org [Accessed 24 February 2022]
  • Hirano M (1972) Desmids from Cambodia, with special reference to Phytoplankton of Lake Grands Lacs (Tonle Sap). Contributions from the Biological Laboratory. Kyoto University 22(3–4): 123–157.
  • Hirano M (1975) Phytoplankton from Lake Boraphet in the central Plain of Thailand. Contributions from the Biological Laboratory. Kyoto University 24(4): 187–203.
  • Islam AKM, Begum A (2004) Desmids from some selected areas of Bangladesh: 1. Genus Micrasterias Agardh. Bangladesh Journal of Plant Taxonomy 11(2): 1–14.
  • Islam AKMN, Ifranullah HM (2006) Hydrobiological studies within the tea gardens at Srimangal, Bangladesh. V. Desmids (Euastrum, Micrasterias, Actinotaenium and Cosmarium). Bangladesh Journal of Plant Taxonomy 13(1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjpt.v13i1.589
  • Jena M, Adhikary SP (2011) Algal diversity of Loktak Lake, Manipur. Nelumbo 53: 21–48.
  • Kalita SR, Ahmed R, Das M (2016) Physico-Chemical Characteristics and Phytoplanktonic Diversity of Urpod Beel, Goalpara Assam (India). Series a Thesis Conceptual Magazine 3(7): 10–14.
  • Kim HS (2013) Algal Flora of Korea (Vol. 6, Number 3). Charophyta: Conjugatophyceae (Desmids II). Desmidiales: Closteriaceae II, Desmidiaceae II. Freshwater Green Algae. Sang Pal Lee Publisher, 103 pp.
  • Krieger W (1939) Die Demidiaceen Europas mit Berücksichtigung der auβereuropäischen Arten. Rabenhorst’s Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz 13(2). Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft M.B.H., Leipzig, 1–117.
  • Lalèyè P, Chikou A, Gnohossou P, Vandewalle P, Philippart JC, Teugels G (2006) Studies on the biology of two species of catfish Synodontis schall and Synodontis nigrita (Ostariophysi: Mochokidae) from the Ouémé River, Bénin. Belgian Journal of Zoology 136(2): 193–201.
  • Leentvaar P (1975) Hydrobiological observations in Surinam with special reference to the man-made Brokopondo Lake. Studies of the fauna of Suriname and other Gayanas 56: 1–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7106-1_1
  • Levanets A, Guiry MD (2021 [May 28]) Validation of desmid names (Desmidiales, Zygnematophyceae) described by G.A. Prowse from Malaysia and Singapore. Notulae Algarum 193: 1–3.
  • Levanets A, Janse van Vuuren S (2023 [February 1]) Micrasterias foliacea var. nurulislamii Levanets & Janse van Vuuren, nom. nov. (≡“Micrasterias foliacea var. spinosa Islam & Ashrafi”, nom. inval.) (Desmidiaceae, Zygnematophyceae). Notulae Algarum 270: 1.
  • Li WKW, Andersen RA, Gifford DJ, Incze LS, Martin JL, Pilskaln CH, Rooney-Varga JN, Sieracki ME, Wilson WH, Wolff NH (2011) Planktonic Microbes in the Gulf of Maine Area. PLoS ONE 6(6) e20981. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020981
  • Ling HU, Taylor PA (2000) Australian Freshwater Algae (exclusive of diatoms). J. Cramer in der Gebrüder Borntraeger Verlagsbuchhandlung, Berlin, Stuttgart, 643 pp. [Bibliotheca Phycologica 105.]
  • Lütkemüller J (1900) Desmidiaceen aus den Ningpo-Mountains in Centralchina. Annalen des K.K. Naturhistorischen Hofmuseums 15(2): 115–126.
  • Mama AC, Mbeng OL, Dongmo ChT, Moto I, Ngoupayou NJR, Ohondja ALM (2016) Tidal variations and its impacts on the abundance and diversity of phytoplankton in the Nyong Estuary of Cameroon. Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology 3(1): 3667–3675.
  • McAlice BJ (1975) Preliminary checklist of planktonic microalgae from the Gulf of Maine. Maine Sea Grant Information Leaflet 9, March 1975 (MEU-H-75-001), Cooperative Extension Service, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, 17 pp.
  • Medvedeva LA (2007) Results of algological study of middle part of River Bureya basin. In: Medvedeva LA, Teslenko VA, Tiunova TM (Eds) Hydro-ecological monitoring in Bureyskaya Hydro-Electric Power Station zone influences. Institute of Water and Ecological Problems of Far East Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Khabarovsk, 64–79. [In Russian]
  • Ngo H, Prescott GW, Czarnecki DB (1986–1987) Additions and confirmations to the algal flora of Itasca State Park. I. Desmids and diatoms from North Deming Pond. Journal of the Minnesota Academy of Science 52(2): 14–26. https://doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-26-2-293.1
  • Noor S, Salleh A, Nasrodin S (2012) Desmid flora in Tasik Sungai Semuji, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Arts, Social Sciences & Technology, Penang, Malaysia, 3rd-5th March 2012, Paper Code No. I2040: I2040-1-I2040-10.
  • Nordstedt CFO (1869) Desmidiaceae. In: Warming E (Ed.) Symbolae ad floram Brasiliae centralis cognoscendam. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra den Naturhistorisk Forening i Kjøbenhavn for Aaret 14, 15, 195–234.
  • Opute FI (1992) Contribution to the knowledge of algae of Nigeria. 1. Desmids from the Warri / Forcados Estuaries. Part II. The genera Euastrum and Micrasterias. Algological Studies 65: 73–92.
  • Opute FI, Kadiri MO (2013) Phytoplankton algae of Nigeria. A Practical & Theoretical Guide (Vol. 1): The desmids. Mindex Publishing Company Limited, Benin City, 304 pp.
  • Palamar-Mordvintseva GM (1984) Identification guide of the freshwater algae of Ukrainian SSR. VIII. Conjugatophyceae. Part 1. Mesotaeniales, Gonatozygales, Desmidiales. Naukova Dumka Publishing House, Kiev, 512 pp. [In Ukrainian]
  • Prasertsin T, Peerapornpisal Y (2018) Distribution and isolation of microalgae for lipid production in selected freshwater reservoirs of northern Thailand. Biodiversitas (Surakarta) 19(1): 343–350. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d190147
  • Prescott GW, Scott AM (1943) The desmid genus Micrasterias Agardh in southeastern United States. Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts and Letters 28: 67–82.
  • Prowse GA (1969) Some new desmid taxa from Malaya and Singapore. Gardens’ Bulletin (Singapore) 24: 337–346.
  • Ralfs J (1848) The British Desmidieae. Reeve, Benham & Reeve, London, 226 pp.
  • Ratnasabapathy M, Kumano S (1974) Desmids from Tasek Bera, West Malaysia. The Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Phycology (Sôrui) 22(1): 22–28. [In Japanese]
  • Ribeiro CA, Ramos GJP, Oliveira IB, Moura CWN (2015) Micrasterias (Zygnematophyceae) de duas áreas do Pantanal dos Marimbus (Baiano e Remanso), Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brasil. Ciências Biológicas, Sitientibus série 15: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.13102/scb578
  • Salazar C (2006/2007) Desmidiaceae (Zygophyceae) asociadas a Hymenachne amplexicaulis (Poaceae) en una sabana tropical inundable, Venezuela. Memoria de la Fundación La Salle de Ciencias Naturales 166: 95–131.
  • Salazár Pereira CV (1991) Estudio sistemático de la ficoflora perifítica (Desmidiales y Euglenaceae) asociada a Himenachne amplexicaulis en una sabana inundable de Venezuela. Doctorado en Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, La Plata, 237 pp.
  • Schumacher G (1956) A qualitative and quantitative study of the plankton algae in southwestern Georgia ponds. American Midland Naturalist 56(1): 88–115. https://doi.org/10.2307/2422446
  • Silveira Jr AM (2012) Composição e biomassa microfitoplanctônica associadas a variáveis fisico e químicas em dois transectos da zona estuarinado Rio Amazonas (Amapá, Amazônia, Brasil). Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde da Universidade Federal do Amapá – UNIFAP, como parte dos requisitos necessários para a obtenção do título de Mestre em Ciências da Saúde; Área de Concentração, Ensaios Biológicos, Macapá, 92 pp.
  • The Global Biodiversity Information Facility (2023) GBIF Home Page. https://www.gbif.org [Accessed 17 April 2023]
  • Thomas JK, Sreekumar S, Jaya Cheriyan (2003) Muriyad Wetlands: ecological changes and human consequences. Project report submitted to Kerala Research Programme on Local Development, Centre for Developmental Studies, Thiruvanandapuram, 83 pp.
  • Thomasson K (1966) Le phytoplancton du lac Shiwa Ngandu: Phytoplankton of Lake Shiwa Ngandu. Exploration hydrobiologique du bassin du lac Bangweolo et du Luapula, v.4, fasc.2: 1–91.
  • Thomasson K (1977) Two conspicuous desmids from Amazonas. Botaniska Notiser, Stockholm 130: 41–51.
  • Thomasson K (1986) Algal Vegetation in North Australian Billabongs. Nova Hedwigia 42(204): 301–378.
  • Turland NJ, Wiersema JH, Barrie FR, Greuter W, Hawksworth DL, Herendeen PS, Knapp S, Kusber W-H, Li D-Z, Marhold K, May TW, McNeill J, Monro AM, Prado J, Price MJ, Smith GF [Eds] (2018) International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017. Regnum Vegetabile (Vol. 159). Koeltz Botanical Books, Glashütten, 253 pp. https://doi.org/10.12705/Code.2018
  • Turner WB (1892) Algae Aquae Dulcis Indiae Orientalis. The Fresh-Water Algae (principally Desmidieae) of East India. Kongl. Boktryckeriet, Stockholm, 187 pp.
  • Ubong G, Aniema I-E, Ndueso I (2017) Bio-monitoring and diversity of phytoplankton in a tropical estuarine mangrove swamp in Akwa Ibom State, South-South, Nigeria. European Journal of Biotechnology and Bioscience 5(4): 71–79.
  • Williamson DB, Marazzi L (2013) A new Cosmarium (Chlorophyta, Desmidiaceae) variety from the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Quekett Journal of Microscopy 42: 35–37.
  • Zalocar de Domitrovic Y (1981) Desmidiales (Chlorophyta) de la provincia de Corrientes (Argentina). II. El género Micrasterias. Physis (Buenos Aires). Sec. B 40(98): 55–62.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1 

Geographical distribution of M. foliacea var. foliacea throughout the world.

Anatoliy Levanets, Sanet Janse van Vuuren

Data type: Distribution, references

Explanation note: Habitat types and locations are indicated, together with the reference stating its presence.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (74.33 kb)
Supplementary material 2 

Geographical distribution of M. foliacea var. elongata, multiornata, nodosa, nurulislamii, quandrinflata and spinosa throughout the world

Anatoliy Levanets, Sanet Janse van Vuuren

Data type: Distribution, references

Explanation note: Habitat types and locations are indicated, together with the reference stating its presence.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (49.22 kb)
Supplementary material 3 

Geographical distribution of M. foliacea var. ornata throughout the world

Anatoliy Levanets, Sanet Janse van Vuuren

Data type: Distribution, references

Explanation note: Habitat types and locations are indicated, together with the reference stating its presence.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (22.48 kb)
Supplementary material 4 

Supplementary references

Anatoliy Levanets, Sanet Janse van Vuuren

Data type: references

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (22.66 kb)
login to comment