Research Article
Print
Research Article
Amentotaxus × hybridia (Taxaceae), a new natural Amentotaxus hybrid from southeast Yunnan province, China
expand article infoLian-Ming Gao§, Gui-Liang Zhang|, Zhi-Qiong Mo§, Philip Thomas#
‡ Lijiang Forest Diversity National Observation and Research Station, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lijiang, China
§ CAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
| Hekou Branch of Administration Bureau of Daweishan National Nature Reserve, Honghe, China
¶ University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
# Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Open Access

Abstract

During floristic surveys of Taxaceae in Hekou County, Yunnan Province, China, a putative natural hybrid between A. yunnanensis H.L. Li and A. hekouensis L.M. Gao was collected. Morphological and molecular evidence confirms its status as a natural hybrid. Amentotaxus × hybridia L.M. Gao has linear or linear-lanceolate leaves 6–13 cm × 1.0–1.5 cm, white stomatal bands with 34–40 rows on abaxial side, 2.5–3.5 mm, slightly wider than leaf margins; 3–6 seeds borne at the base of the branchlet, peduncle 1.3–1.6 cm long with 3–4 rows of persistent basal bracts.

Keywords

Amentotaxus × hybridia, molecular evidence, natural hybridisation, new hybrid, Taxaceae

Introduction

The genus Amentotaxus Pilg. (1916) in the family Taxaceae comprises five or six species (Fu et al. 1999; Farjon 2010; Yang et al. 2017). Southeast Yunnan (China) and adjacent areas of Vietnam and Laos are the centre of diversity for this genus with more than half of the known species recorded (Nguyen et al. 2004; Averyanov et al. 2014; Gao et al. 2019).

In February 2016, surveys were undertaken in the mountains near Nanxi town, Hekou county, Yunnan province, China to collect fertile material of the recently described species Ametotaxus hekouensis L.M. Gao. This taxon was initially identified as a potential new species based on DNA barcoding data (Gao et al. 2017) and then subsequently formally described (Gao et al. 2019). During the 2016 surveys, a tree with vegetative morphology intermediate between A. yunnanensis H.L. Li and A. hekouensis but with seed cones resembling A. hekouensis, was found growing with several trees identified as either A. yunnanensis or A. hekouensis. Its intermediate characters indicated that it may represent a hybrid between A. yunnanensis and A. hekouensis. Initial sequencing of two DNA barcodes, the plastid DNA (ptDNA) trnL-F and the internal transcribed spacer of nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrITS), previously used for species identification within Amentotaxus (Gao et al. 2017) indicated that the paternally inherited (Collins et al. 2013) ptDNA trnL-F sequence was identical to that of A. hekouensis (GenBank accession number: KX059381). The ITS sequence of the hybrid individual (including the whole length of ITS1 and 5.8S, and a partial sequence of ITS2) was also identical to that of A. hekouensis (GenBank accession number: JF975885). However, we found many mixed nucleotide sites in the ITS sequence where they are polymorphic between A. yunnanensis and A. hekouensis ITS sequences. These sites had double peaks but with different heights in the Sanger sequencing trace file, which suggested the presence of interspecific hybridisation but required further research.

Materials and methods

All measurements of the new hybrid of Amentotaxus were taken from dried herbarium specimens of the hybrid individual GLM164267. All measurements of A. hekouensis and A. yunnanensis were based on literature (Fu et al. 1999; Farjon 2010; Gao et al. 2019) and our collections and observations.

To confirm that the individual (GLM164267) is a hybrid between A. hekouensis and A. yunnanensis, we generated approximately 2.5GB (gigabase) of genome skimming data to assemble the complete plastid genome and nrITS region. The methods of DNA extraction, genome skimming sequencing, the plastome and nrITS sequences assembly, and gene annotation are detailed in Fu et al. (2022). We mapped the genome skimming reads back to the nrITS sequence to show the nucleotide composition of polymorphic sites of the hybrid individual along with the ITS sequence of A. hekouensis and A. yunnanensis (Gao et al. 2017).

Results and discussion

The morphological trait comparison among the three taxa showed that several traits of the hybrid (Amentotaxus × hybridia), such as texture of leaves, width of stomatal bands, and number of rows of each stomatal band, are intermediate between A. hekouensis and A. yunnanensis, but with more similarity to A. hekouensis. The hybrid differs from its parental species by having linear or linear-lanceolate leaves, white stomatal bands with 34–40 rows that are slightly wider than the marginal bands in width; 3–6 seeds borne at the base of the branchlet, and 3–4 rows of persistent basal bracts at the peduncle (Table 1).

Table 1.

Morphological character comparison of the three Amentotaxus taxa.

Characters A. hekouensis A. × hybridia A. yunnanensis
Leaf Length (cm) 8–12.5 cm 6–13 cm 3.5–10 cm
Leaf width (cm) 9–14 mm 10–15 mm 8–12 mm
Leaf texture thin, leathery moderately thick, leathery thick, leathery
Leaf apex long acuminate acuminate obtuse or tapered
Width of stomatal bands 2.1–3.0 mm 2.5–3.5 mm 3–4 mm
No. rows of each stomatal band 25–30 34–40 c. 40
Ratio of stomatal band/marginal band 0.75–1 1.10–1.25 > 2
Marginal band colour in fresh leaves bright green green yellowish green
No. of bract rows on peduncle unknown 3–4 2

The nrITS sequence of the hybrid individual de novo was assembled using the GetOrganelle toolkit (Jin et al. 2020), which is identical to that of A. hekouensis (AM24). There are 6,891 clean reads mapped to the nrITS region with a mean sequencing coverage of 494×. The mapping reads of the ITS region showed that a total of 17 polymorphic sites of ITS sequence were consistent with the polymorphic nucleotide sites between A. hekouensis (AM24) and A. yunnanensis (AM21); 15 were point mutation and two mononucleotide indels (Table 2). The result confirmed that the individual is the result of interspecific hybridisation between A. hekouensis and A. yunnanensis. The dominant nucleotides of the hybrid individual are same as those of A. hekouensis (AM24), and the ratio of the polymorphic nucleotide sites between the parental species ranged from 1.7 to 3.2 with an average of 2.2 (Table 2). This closely corresponds to the results from the direct sequencing of ITS sequence for the hybrid individual by Sanger sequencing. The trace file showed double peaks with different height at the polymorphic sites, and resulted in a messy sequence for primer ITS4 trace file after the occurrence of an indel in the ITS2. These results also indicated that the hybrid may not represent an F1 generation of the hybrid.

Table 2.

Sequence variation and polymorphisms of nrITS among the parent species and the hybrid.

nrITS ITS1 ITS2
Position 179 200 268 307 355 366 368 425 461 516 816 833 856 861 910 964 969
A. yunnanensis AM21 (female) C T G T C A G T G T C C T G C T C
A. hekouensis AM24 (male) T C A C T T T C C C T C A G G
A. × hybridia AM51 T/C C/T A/G C/T T/C T/A T/G C/T C/G C/T T/C -/C C/T A/G G/C -/T G/C
Nucleotide rate of polymorphic mapping sites# 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 3.2 2.6 2.6 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.7

The length of the plastome of the hybrid (GLM164267) is 137,786 bp with 35.8% GC content. A total of 198,855 reads were mapped to the assembled plastome with an average sequencing coverage of 215×. The whole plastome included 118 unique genes, comprising 4 rRNA genes, 31 tRNA genes (three tRNA have two copies: trnI-CAU, trnN-GUU and trnQ-UUG) and 83 protein-coding genes. The plastid genome phylogenetic tree of Amentotaxus showed that the hybrid individual fell in the clade of A. hekouensis (data not shown). As the plastid genome is paternally inherited in Amentotaxus, the results demonstrate that A. hekouensis is the paternal parent with A. yunnanensis as the maternal parent. In our previous DNA barcoding study (Gao et al. 2017), we also found a hybrid individual (Coll. No.: P11120) from Thai Phin Tung Commune Dong Van, Ha Giang Province, Vietnam, which, at the time, was the first evidence of an interspecific hybridisation in natural populations of Amentotaxus. In that case, the paternal species was A. yunnanensis rather than A. hekouensis, and the hybrid was morphologically more similar to the paternal species A. yunnanensis. Both results demonstrate natural hybridisation between A. yunnanensis and A. hekouensis when they occur sympatically. The hybrids are morphologically more similar to the paternal species. The results also indicate that bidirectional hybridisation does occur.

Taxonomic treatment

Amentotaxus × hybridia L.M.Gao & G.L.Zhang, sp. nov.

Figs 1, 2, Table 1

Diagnosis

Amentotaxus × hybridia L.M. Gao & G.L. Zhang resembles A. hekouensis L.M. Gao, but differs by its larger linear or linear-lanceolate leaves of 6–13 cm × 1.0–1.5 cm, stomatal bands with 34–40 rows on abaxial side, 2.5–3.5 mm wide, slightly wider than the green leaf margins; 3–6 seeds borne at the base of the branchlets, peduncle 1.3–1.6 cm long, 3–4 rows of persistent basal bracts (Table 1).

Type

China. Yunnan: Qincaitang Mt., Longbao village, Nanxi Town, Hekou County, Honghe, 22°39'49"N, 104°01'17"E, elevation 1100 m, 15 February 2016 (with mature seeds), Zhang GL, GLM164267 (Holotype: KUN, isotype: KUN).

Morphological description

Small tree up to 5 m tall, bark brown gray; branch cylindric or subtetragonal, yellowish green; leafy branchlets ascending, broadly rectangular to oblong-elliptic in outline, axis green in 1st year, greenish yellow in 2nd and 3rd years, quadrangular or subterete in cross section. Leaves borne at 40–70° to the branchlet axis, distichous, twisted at the short petiolate or nearly sessile base, subsessile or petiolate, petiole to 2 mm long, almost opposite, 5–7 leaf pairs on each branchlet; Leaves leathery, linear or linear-lanceolate, 6–13 cm × 1.0–1.5 cm, straight, sometimes slightly falcate, cuneate at base, asymmetric, apex acuminate, leaf margin narrowly revolute, sometime flat; leaf marginal band green when fresh, yellowish green when dry, 2.0–3.0 mm wide; stomatal bands white when fresh and yellow white when dry, 2.5–3.5 mm wide, slightly wider than green leaf margins, stomata in 34–40 rows of each band, densely arranged; midvein slightly sunken or flat adaxially, raised abaxially, 1.5–2.0 mm wide, narrower than the stomatal and marginal bands, yellowish green, same color as the branchlet. Seed-bearing structures in clusters of 3–6 at the base of the branchlet, not from subtending leaf. Aril reddish purple when ripe. Mature seed reddish purple, obovoid-ellipsoid, 2.5–3.0 cm × 1.4–1.6 cm, mucronate at apex, naked; peduncle 1.3–1.6 cm long, compressed-quadrangular, slightly dilated below bracts; 3–4 rows of persistent basal bracts on peduncle, four bracts per row, imbricate, obovate or obovate-oblong, with a ridge in middle. Seed maturity February. Pollen cone not seen.

Figure 1. 

Amentotaxus × hybridia L.M. Gao & G.L. Zhang (from the holotype, drawn by Ling Wang) A branchlet with seeds B seed with peduncle and bracts.

Distribution and ecology

Amentotaxus × hybridia has only been found in the karst montane monsoon evergreen forest in southeast Yunnan province along the border between China (Hekou, Yunnan) and Vietnam occurring at an elevation around 1100 m.

Figure 2. 

Amentotaxus × hybridia L.M. Gao & G.L. Zhang A habitat B habit C branchlet with abaxial leaves D branchlet with adaxial leaves E seeds bearing branchlet and seeds with mucronate apex F seed-bearing structure with peduncle and bracts.

Phenology

Seed matures in February.

Etymology

The specific epithet is derived from the natural hybridisation between A. yunnanensis and A. hekouensis.

Conservation status

As a natural hybrid, Amentotaxus × hybridia is not eligible for listing under the current IUCN Categories and Criteria (IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee 2022). However, as it occurs in areas where A. yunnanensis and A. hekouensis are sympatric, hybridisation could lead to a loss of genetic diversity for those species. In addition, the lack of a reproductive barrier between A. hekouensis and A. yunnanensis has implications for ex-situ conservation programs, especially if collections are intended to be used as a source of material for reintroduction or for long term conservation in cultivation.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Ms. Ling Wang from KUN for drawing the illustration of the holotype. This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB31000000) and the Key Basic Research Program of Yunnan Province, China (202101BC070003). The Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh is funded by the Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services division of the Scottish Government.

References

  • Averyanov LV, Nguyen TH, Sinh KN, Pham TV, Lamxay V, Bounphanmy S, Lorphengsy S, Phan LK, Lanorsavanh S, Chantthavongsa K (2014) Gymnosperms of Laos. Nordic Journal of Botany 32(6): 765–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.00498
  • Collins D, Mill RR, Möller M (2003) Species separation of Taxus baccata, T. canadensis, and T. cuspidata (Taxaceae) and origins of their reputed hybrids inferred from RAPD and cpDNA data. American Journal of Botany 90(2): 175–182. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.2.175
  • Fu LK, Li N, Mill RR (1999) Taxaceae. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, Hong DY (Eds) Flora of China. Beijing: Science Press; St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press 4: 89–96.
  • Fu CN, Mo ZQ, Yang JB, Cai J, Ye LJ, Zou JY, Qin HT, Zheng W, Hollingsworth PM, Li DZ, Gao LM (2022) Testing genome skimming for species discrimination in the large and taxonomically difficult genus Rhododendron. Molecular Ecology Resources 22(1): 4049–4414. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13479
  • Gao LM, Li Y, Phan LK, Yan LJ, Thomas P, Long KP, Möller M, Li DZ (2017) DNA barcoding of East Asian Amentotaxus (Taxaceae): Potential new species and implications for conservation. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 55(1): 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12207
  • Jin JJ, Yu WB, Yang JB, Song Y, Depamphilis CW, Yi TS, Li DZ (2020) GetOrganelle: A fast and versatile toolkit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes. Genome Biology 21(1): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-02154-5
  • Nguyen TH, Phan KL, Nguyen NDTL, Thomas PI, Farjon A, Averyanov L, Regalado J (2004) Amentotaxus. Vietnam Conifers: Conservation Status Review. Fauna and Flora International, Vietnam Program, Hanoi, 102–109.
  • Yang Y, Wang ZH, Xu XT (2017) Taxonomy and Distribution of Global Gymnosperms. Shanghai Science and Technology Press, Shanghai, 1039 pp.
login to comment