Research Article
Print
Research Article
Rosa funingensis (Rosaceae), a new species from Yunnan, China
expand article infoLing-Na Zheng§|, Le Luo§|, Yu-Wei Tang§|, Chao Yu§|, Pei-Feng Lyu§|, Xue-Sen Liu§|, Qi-Xiang Zhang§|, Yu-Yong Yang§|#
‡ Engineering Research Center of Landscape Environment of Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
§ National Engineering Research Center for Floriculture, Beijing, China
| Key Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding in Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants of Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
¶ Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China
# Kunming Yang Chinese Rose Gardening Co., Kunming, China
Open Access

Abstract

A new species Rosa funingensis and its variant R. funingensis f. rosea, both collected from Yunnan Province, China, are, for the first time, documented and illustrated in this study. Morphological analysis in comparison with two related species in the wild, R. gigantea and R. rubus, presents distinguishable features through leaf surfaces, inflorescences and the shape of styles. R. funingensis leaf surfaces are abaxially villous, purple-red, pale green when mature, adaxially glabrous, dark green; inflorescences solitary or 2–5(7) in corymbose cyme; and styles connate into a column or not, exserted.

Key words

molecular evidence, morphology, new species, Rosa, wild germplasm

Introduction

There are about 150–200 species of roses around the world, widely distributed throughout the Northern Hemisphere, with Central and Southwest Asia being the centres of distribution of the genus (Rehder 1951; Ku and Robertson 2003; Quest-Ritson and Quest-Ritson 2003). China has 95 species of the genus Rosa, of which 65 species are endemic (Ku and Robertson 2003); there are also 34 varieties, totalling 129 taxa of roses (Liu and Lian 2014). The number of wild rose species in China are found to decrease gradually from the southeast to the southwest and northwest of the country (Yu and Lu 1985). Yunnan is one of the main distribution centres and differentiation centres of Rosa (Xu 2001), with 41 species and 17 varieties of wild Rosa (Chen and Li 2006).

On 5 April 2018, a unique species of Rosa was discovered during an investigation of wild rose resources in Funing County, Wenshan Zhuang and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan Province, China. It shared certain morphological characteristics with R. gigantea and R. rubus, while being distinguished in terms of leaf, inflorescence and shape of styles. Subsequently, this species was introduced to the Kunming South Tropical Garden (Kunming Nanguo Shanhua) Horticulture Technology Co. Ltd., Yunnan Province for further observation and study. After a thorough examination over a period of three years, it was determined that the specific morphological characteristics of this species and its variant were stable, indicating that they were, indeed, new to the Rosa genus. In 2021, phylogenetic relationships were analysed after collecting the specimens to confirm their status as a new species within the genus Rosa. As a result of this research, the new species was described and named as Rosa funingensis L. Luo & Y. Y. Yang. Additionally, a form of this new species was identified and documented as Rosa funingensis L. Luo & Y. Y. Yang f. rosea L. Luo & Y. Y. Yang, characterised by its light salmon-pink flowers that fade to white.

Materials and methods

Field observations, comparative morphology

We studied living plants of the new species in their natural habitats and documented their known distribution ranges. Morphological descriptions and illustrations were based on mature foliage, fresh flowering material and mature fruit of living plants and dried specimens of R. funingensis and R. funingensis f. rosea.

Phylogenetic analysis

Sixteen taxa of the genus Rosa, including Rosa funingensis and two outgroups (Fragaria vesca and Potentilla tanacetifolia) were used to reconstruct a phylogenetic tree. Sequences of R. Chinensis ‘Old Blush’ (sequence number: SRR6175515), Fragaria vesca (sequence number: SRR12536045) and Potentilla tanacetifolia (sequence number: SRR8208352) were downloaded from GenBank. The other 14 taxa were selected from six sections. Their complete genomic DNA was extracted from silica-gel-dried leaves using the CTAB method (Porebski et al. 1997) and sequenced using Illumina NovaSeq.

The sequenced data were quality-controlled to obtain clean data. Genome alignment was performed using MINIMAP2 v.2.21. PCR de-duplication and SNP detection were performed using gatk v.4.2.0.0. SNP annotation was performed using ANNOVAR v.2020-06-07. The processed SNP data were analysed in VCFTOOLS v.0.1.17 for Fst analysis (fst-window-size 100000 fst-window-step 10000), thetaΠ analysis (window-pi 100000 window-pi-step 10000) and Tajima’s D analysis (TajimaD 100000). The resulting data were analysed in MEGA11 (Tamura et al. 2021). The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method and the Kimura 2-parameter model (Kimura 1980). The tree with the highest log likelihood (-9601.46) is shown. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered together is shown next to the branches. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying Neighbour-Joining and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood (MCL) approach and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value. There were a total of 3560 positions in the final dataset.

Results

Phylogenetic analysis

The ML phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1) showed that Rosa glomerata, R. soulieana (sect. Synstylae) and R. kweichowensis (sect. Microphyllae) and all the species of sect. chinenses formed a well-supported clade (purple), with the sister group of R. lasiosepala, R. luciae and R. rubus of sect. synstylae (orange). The putative new species, R. funingensis, is placed into a well-supported clade with R. gigantea (sect. chinenses) and formed a larger clade with sect. chinenses.

Figure 1. 

The Maximum Likelihood tree, based on SNPs data. Numbers above branches are ML bootstraps. Grey represents the outgroup, light blue represents sect. Pimpinellifoliae, green represents sect. Banksianae and yellow represents sect. Cinnamomeae. Orange represents sect. Synstylae, purple represents sect. Chinenses and dark blue represents sect. Microphyllae. The new species is shown in bold.

Discussion

Rosa funingensis is often in association with R. rubus and R. gigantea in the wild where there are no other members of the genus Rosa present. The overlap of the flowering period of R. rubus (late March to late April) and R. gigantea (March) generates the possibility of natural hybridisation to produce offspring.

Morphologically, Rosa funingensis shares similarities with both R. rubus and R. gigantea, but it is not exactly the same as either one, which provides further evidence that R. funingensis may be a natural hybrid. The molecular evolutionary tree also supports this inference.

The discovery of this new species enriches the resources of Rosa and provides new materials for interspecific hybridisation. Hybridisation between sections has been a great challenge in rose breeding, making wild Rosa resources not sufficiently exploited (Zhao et al. 2015). The hybridised experiment during 2020–2022 between R. funingensis and the wild species of sect. chinenses shows that it is, indeed, a good breeding material. The inclusion of R. funingensis as a new germplasm resource for breeding between sect. chinenses and sect. synstylae has the potential to enhance the genetic diversity and improve the breeding outcomes of the genus Rosa.

Additionally, during our field research, we also found plants that are similar to R. funingensis, but with smaller leaflets (7–9); stipule margin covered with sparsely glandular hairs; flowers showing light salmon-pink at the beginning and turning white at the later stage; hip obovoid. We speculate that these plants may be a form of R. funingensis, with an increased number of leaflets and this is currently under observation.

Taxonomic treatment

Rosa funingensis L. Luo & Y.Y. Yang, sp. nov.

Figs 2, 3, 4

Type

China, Muyang Town, Funing County, Wenshan Zhuang and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan Province, 23°25′27″N, 105°21′15″E, 1396 m a.s.l., 31 March 2021, Y. Y. Yang (Holotype BJFC00107680!).

Figure 2. 

Specimens of Rosa funingensis and R. funingensis f. rosea A R. funingensis B R. funingensis var. rosea.

Diagnosis

Rosa funingensis is mostly similar to R. gigantea. However, Rosa funingensis differs significantly from R. gigantea by having leaves abaxially villous, purple-red, pale green when mature, adaxially glabrous, dark green (vs. both surfaces glabrous), rachis and petiole shortly prickly, glandular hairs and villous (vs. sparsely shortly prickly and glandular pubescent), inflorescences solitary or 3–5(7) in corymbose cyme (vs. solitary or 2 or 3 and fasciculate) and styles connate into a column or not (vs. free) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Morphological comparisons of Rosa funingensis, R. gigantea and R. rubus.

R. funingensis R. gigantea R. rubus
Leaflet number 5–7 5–9 3–5
Branch glabrous glabrous pubescent when young, glabrous when old
Leaf surface abaxially pubescent, adaxially glabrous both surfaces glabrous abaxially pubescent or glandular, adaxially usually glabrous, rarely pubescent
Rachis and petiole shortly prickly, glandular hairy and pubescent sparsely shortly prickly and glandular pubescent with sparse small curved prickles
Stipule margin pubescent and glandular glabrous, or glandular only at free parts pubescent and glandular
Inflorescence solitary or 2–5(7) in cyme solitary 10–25 in cyme
Pedicel glandular glabrous or glandular pubescent and glandular
Flower size (diameter) 7–9 cm 8–9 cm 4–5 cm
Styles connate into a column or not free connate into a column
Hip colour and size (diameter) yellow, 1.2–1.5 cm yellow, 2.5–2.8 cm red, 1.0–1.5 cm

Description

Rosa funingensis : Shrubs climbing, new branches 5–6 m long. Branchlets green, young stems purple-red on sunny side, glabrate; prickles scattered, slightly curved, robust, flat, gradually tapering to broad base. Leaflets including petiole 12–14 cm; stipules mostly adnate to petiole, free parts lanceolate, villous or with short dentate glands at margin, apex acuminate, dry and shrinking when old; rachis and petiole shortly prickly, glandular hairs and villous hairs. Leaves usually 5–7, often 3 near inflorescence, leaflets obovate or oblong, 3–4 × 2–2.5 cm, apex acuminate, leaves leathery, adaxially glabrous, dark green, abaxially villous, purple-red, pale green when mature, margin with sharp single serrations. Inflorescences solitary or several in cyme; peduncle with pedicels 1–2 cm, densely glandular hairs; bracts linear, apex acuminate, 1 × 0.3 cm, margin glandular hairy, with prominent mid-vein. Flowers 7–9 cm in diam.; sepals 5, ovate-lanceolate, abaxially glandular-pubescent, apically caudate, adaxially villous, margin glandular hairs, occasionally linearly divided, reflexed; petals 5, single, white, nearly cordate, apex emarginate, with strong sweet fragrance. Styles connate into a column or not, exserted, light red and the stigma is light yellow. Hips yellow, subglobose, 1.2–1.5 cm in diam., glabrous. 2n = 14.

Phenology

Flowering in early April, fruiting from July to October.

Etymology

The species epithet refers to Funing County, where the new species was first discovered. The variant with pink flower colour is proposed to be named “Rosa funingensis f. rosea”.

Distribution and habitat

New species are currently known from Funing County, Wenshan Zhuang and Miao Autonomous Prefecture in eastern Yunnan, at elevations between 400 m and 1400 m. They grow on hillsides, roadsides and riversides.

Conservation status

Based on currently available data, the newly-described Rosa funingensis species and its variants should be assigned to the ‘Data Deficient’ (DD) category of IUCN (2022). The precise conservation status of the population(s) has not been determined. Further explorations are needed to assess its distribution and conservation status. The known distribution of this species is limited. The type locality of this new species is an unprotected mountainous area. Increasing human activities and habitat destruction may cause a threat to the existence of this rare species.

Rosa funingensis L. Luo & Y.Y. Yang f. rosea L. Luo & Y.Y. Yang, f. nov.

Figs 2, 3, 4

Type

China, Muyang Town, Funing County, Wenshan Zhuang and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan Province, 1396 m a.s.l., 23°25′27″N, 105°21′15″E, 31 March 2021, Y. Y. Yang (Holotype BJFC00107675!)

Figure 3. 

Rosa funingensis and R. funingensis f. rosea A plant B leaves C stipule D branches and prickles E, F two different Inflorescences G, H two different styles I–K flowering process of R. funingensis L–N flowering process of R. funingensis f. rosea O, P hips.

Description

Rosa funingensis f. rosea: Flowers light salmon-pink and fading to white.

Figure 4. 

Illustration of Rosa funingensis and Rosa funingensis f. rosea A whole plant B floral anatomy C hip D flowers of R. funingensis E stipule F flowers of R. funingensis f. rosea. Drawn by Y. W. Tang.

Etymology

The variant with pink flower colour is proposed to be named “Rosa funingensis f. rosea”.

Identification key to taxa in R. sect. Chinenses and Rosa rubus

1 Styles connate into a column; sepals pinnately lobed; mature hips red R. rubus
Syles free or connate into a column; sepals often entire, occasionally pinnately lobed; mature hips yellow 2
2 Young stems glabrous, leaflets 5–7–(9); flowers always open wide and flat and are floppy in full bloom; hips globose or depressed-globose 3
Young stems pubescent or glabrous; leaflets 3 – 5 – (7); flowers hardly completely open, often high-centred (bowl-shaped) in full bloom; hips ovoid, obovoid or globose 4
3 Leaves glabrous; stipule margin glabrous, or only glandular at free parts; flowers solitary; styles free R. gigantea
Leaves abaxially pubescent; stipule margin pubescent and glandular; flowers solitary or 2–5(7) in cyme; styles connate into a column or not R. funingensis
4 Young stems pubescent; leaflets 3–(5) R. lucidissima
Young stems glabrous; leaflets (3)–5–(7) R. chinensis var. spontanea

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Tong Deng (Beijing Forestry University) and Heling Fu (Beijing Forestry University) for their valuable comments.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This study was jointly supported by The National Natural Science Foundation of China (32071820), The National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFD1001001) and Beijing High-Precision Discipline Project, Discipline of Ecological Environment of Urban and Rural Human Settlements.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: LL. Data curation: LNZ. Funding acquisition: LL, QXZ. Investigation: XSL, YYY, PFL. Methodology: LNZ. Project administration: LL. Resources: LL. Supervision: CY. Visualization: YWT, LNZ. Writing - original draft: LNZ. Writing - review and editing: PFL.

Author ORCIDs

Ling-Na Zheng https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3850-5413

Le Luo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8143-1931

Yu-Wei Tang https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9722-2299

Chao Yu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8096-5333

Pei-Feng Lyu https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9969-5356

Xue-Sen Liu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0240-2551

Qi-Xiang Zhang https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5690-0065

Yu-Yong Yang https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4134-6847

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.

References

  • Chen SK, Li DZ (2006) Flora Yunnanica (Vol. 12), Science Press, Beijing, 570–600. [In Chinese]
  • Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16: 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731581
  • Ku TC, Robertson KR (2003) Rosa (Rosaceae). In: Wu ZY, Raven PH (Eds) Flora of China 9. Beijing and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, 339–381.
  • Liu QL, Lian LJ (2014) China Rose development report (2nd Edn.). Modern Landscape Architecture 11(05): 44–47. [+1–43 pp.] [In Chinese]
  • Porebski S, Bailey LG, Baum BR (1997) Modification of a CTAB DNA extraction protocol for plants containing high polysaccharide and polyphenol components. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 15(1): 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02772108
  • Quest-Ritson C, Quest-Ritson B (2003) The American Rose Society Encyclopedia of Roses. DK Publishing, New York, 22 pp.
  • Rehder A (1951) Manual of Cultivated Trees and Shrubs. MacMillan, London, 996–998.
  • Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S (2021) MEGA 11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Molecular Biology and Evolution 38(7): 3022–3027. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab120
  • Xu TZ (2001) The floristic characteristics and geographical distribution of Rosaceae in Yunnan. Plant Diversity 02: 135–142. [In Chinese]
  • Yu TT, Lu LT (1985) Rosa Linnaeus. In: Yu TT (Ed.) Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae 37. Science Press, Beijing, 360–371. [In Chinese]
  • Zhao HX, Wang J, Ding XL, Luo L, Pan HT, Zhang QX (2015) Compatibility of interspecific crossing between several Rosa species and modern Rose cultivars. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica 35(04): 743–753. [In Chinese]

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 

Comparisons of R. funingensis, R. gigantea, and R. rubus

Ling-Na Zheng

Data type: species data

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (858.06 kb)
login to comment