3urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:F7FCE910-8E78-573F-9C77-7788555F8AADPhytoKeysPK1314-20111314-2003Pensoft Publishers10.3897/phytokeys.201.8515485154Research ArticleFabaceaeTaxonomyAsiaMicromorphological leaf epidermal traits as potential taxonomic markers for infrageneric classification of Oxytropis (Fabaceae)ZhaoXiang1HouQinzheng1DuMeina1ZhangHui1JiaLingyun1ZhangZhihua1MaZongqi1SunKunnwnubotany@163.com1College of Life Sciences, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, ChinaNorthwest Normal UniversityLanzhouChina
Corresponding author: Kun Sun (kunsun@nwnu.edu.cn)
Academic editor: Patrick Herendeen
20222106202220151761ACA3B6B-8978-5375-896F-60B4FF090CC966912441004202226052022Xiang Zhao, Qinzheng Hou, Meina Du, Hui Zhang, Lingyun Jia, Zhihua Zhang, Zongqi Ma, Kun SunThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
The characteristics of the leaf epidermis have proven to be useful criteria to support taxonomic studies within Fabaceae. However, there are few systematic studies on the taxonomic significance of leaf epidermis of Oxytropis DC. Here, we used light and scanning electron microscopy to investigate leaf epidermal characteristics of 18 species of genus Oxytropis from the Northeastern Margin of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Our examination showed two main types of leaf epidermal cells: polygonal and irregular, and four different patterns of anticlinal walls: straight-arched, sinuolate, undulate, and sinuate. All species studied possess anomocytic stomata. Two trichome shapes were identified: strip-like trichomes, that were present only in O.ciliata, and cylindrical trichomes, present in all other species. Epidermal cell shape and anticlinal wall pattern were constant within species and are useful for species delimitation within genus Oxytropis, when combined with other macroscopic traits. The shape of trichomes can be useful for distinguishing O.ciliata from the other investigated species. Stomatal type was the same within the genus and may be used to elaborate the phylogenetic relationships between genera in combination with data on stomata from other genera. Cluster analysis results were largely consistent with the classification of species and sections based on macro morphological data, indicating that foliar epidermis characteristics of Oxytropis can be used as markers for taxonomic identification at the infrageneric classification level. Lastly, our results support the delineation of the section Leucopodia as an independent section but do not support the merging of section Gobicola into section Baicalia.
Chinacluster analysisleaf epidermisLMOxytropisSEMtaxonomyGansu Key Research and Development Project-Agriculture (grant number 18YF1NA051)Citation
Zhao X, Hou Q, Du M, Zhang H, Jia L, Zhang Z, Ma Z, Sun K (2022) Micromorphological leaf epidermal traits as potential taxonomic markers for infrageneric classification of Oxytropis (Fabaceae). PhytoKeys 201: 51–76. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.201.85154
Introduction
Genus Oxytropis DC. is one of the largest groups within Fabaceae, with approximately 330 species occurring in the cold mountainous regions of Europe, Asia, and North America, and also concentrated in Central Asia (Polhill 1981; Zhu et al. 2010). The genus was established by De Candolle (1802), who distinguished it from Astragalus based on differences in keel-petals and legumes. In China, Oxytropis species are mainly distributed in the north and northwest regions (Zhang 1998; Zhu and Ohashi 2000). However, there is some debate regarding the delimitation and identification of species within this genus. In China, the genus was first reported by Peter-Stibal (1937), who recorded two subgenera, 11 sections, and 27 species. Wang and Tang (1955) recorded 27 species of Oxytropis and 1 variety in China. In contrast, in Flora Reipublica Popularis Sinicae (FRPS), Zhang (1998) divided Oxytropis into six subgenera, 22 sections, and 146 species. While Zhu and Ohashi (2000) recognized 125 species and 4 varieties, a recent study (Zhu et al. 2010) on the Flora of China (FOC) reported that the genus Oxytropis consisted of three subgenera and 20 sections containing 133 species. Therefore, different species delimitations in China have been proposed by taxonomists, whereby the infrageneric delimitation of Oxytropis remains controversial.
Leaf epidermal anatomical features, such as epidermal cell shape, epicuticular waxes (Barthlott et al. 1998; Wissemann 2000; Tomaszewski and Zieliński 2014; Tomaszewski et al. 2019), stomatal complexes (Carpenter 2005; Alvarez et al. 2009; Yang et al. 2012; Nisa et al. 2019), and trichomes (Webster et al. 1996; Hu et al. 2012; Eiji and Salmaki 2016; Mannethody and Purayidathkandy 2018; Ashfaq et al. 2019), are all useful diagnostic and taxonomic characteristics. The taxonomic relevance of the foliar epidermal characteristics of Fabaceae is well documented (Zou et al. 2008; Alege and Shaibu 2015; Silva et al. 2018; Shaheen et al. 2020). Zou et al. (2008) found that epidermal characteristics can be used to distinguish genus Bauhinia from Cercis. Similarly, Chukwuma et al. (2014) described the presence of glandular trichomes and found that they could be used as a distinguishing feature between genera Centrosema and Clitoria. Consistently, in genus Lotus, epidermal micromorphological features are useful and informative for distinguishing between sections Simpeteria and Microlotus (Stenglein et al. 2003).
Leaf epidermal features are also valuable for classification at the species level in Fabaceae. For example, Silva et al. (2018) found that leaflet anatomy is taxonomically useful at both genus and species levels in the Dipterygeae clade. Similarly, Rashid et al. (2019) concluded that the combination of leaf epidermal characteristics and other traits has potential for taxonomic resolution at the species level in the tribe Trifolieae. Additionally, in Crotalaria, leaf characteristics, such as texture, venation pattern, and epidermis, have shown potential for aiding the circumscription of some species (Devecchi et al. 2014).
Previous studies have investigated different aspects of Oxytropis, including cytology (Ledingham 1957, 1960; Ledingham and Rever 1963; Ranjbar et al. 2010; Liu et al. 2011; Martin et al. 2015), molecular phylogeny (Jorgensen et al. 2003; Archambault and Strömvik 2012; Dizkirici et al. 2016), pollen (Zhu and Ohashi 2000; Wang 2005; Ceter et al. 2013), and seed micromorphology (Solum and Lockerman 1991; Bojňanský and Fargašová 2007; Meyers et al. 2013; Erkul et al. 2015). On the other hand, relatively few studies on leaf epidermal anatomy have been reported in Oxytropis species (Karaman et al. 2009; Lu 2011), which described leaf epidermal traits by light or scanning electron microscopy but lacked systematic analysis. In addition, the Northeastern Margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau is located in the transition zone between the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and the Loess Plateau, the two main distribution areas of Oxytropis in China (Fig. 1). This region includes the northeastern part of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and the western part of the Loess Plateau (Tian et al. 2021) (Fig. 1). It is one of the regions with rich diversity of Oxytropis (Zhang 1998; Zhu et al. 2010). However, little research has been conducted on the epidermal traits of Oxytropis in this region. Thus, we provide the first systematic comparison and microscopic investigation of 18 species of Oxytropis from this region using light and scanning electron microscopy to elucidate the taxonomic significance of leaf micromorphology and test the recent taxonomic treatment (Zhu et al. 2010).
Map of study area. Numbers represent sample codes, as shown in Table 1.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/704267Materials and methods
All leaf samples were obtained from specimens deposited at the herbarium of the Northwest Normal University. The materials investigated are listed in Table 1, and the infrageneric classification by Zhu et al. (2010) was adopted (Fig. 1). Those used for analysis by light microscopy were soaked in water at 37 °C for 12–18 h; removed and placed under a dissecting microscope to separate the epidermal tissue from the leaf body, followed by maceration in 1% safranine solution. To check the consistency of the epidermal structure under a light microscope (DM6 B Leica, Leica Microsistemas S.L.U., Barcelona, Spain), at least 20 slides were prepared from different parts of a single leaf, and from different leaves of each species. The number and size of the stomata on each slide were counted. Materials for observation by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were mounted directly on the stubs without treatment. After gold sputtering, the specimens were examined and imaged using a field emission (FE-SEM) Zeiss Ultra Plus instrument (Zeiss, Germany). Quantitative and qualitative traits were selected when performing cluster analysis.
Source of materials.
Section
Code
Species
Locality
Coordinates
Habitat
Voucher
Section Xerobia
1
O.ciliata
Yueliang Mountain
36°25'41.85"N, 105°42'23.71"E
Valley
X. Zhao 1947
Section Polyadena
2
O.muricata
Maxian Mountain
35°47'46.48"N, 103°58'12.64"E
Sunny hillside
X. Zhao 1903
Section Falcicarpae
3
O.falcata
Awangcang wetland park
33°45'32.85"N, 101°41'6.58"E
Riverside
X. Zhao 1842
Section Baicalia
4
O.ochrantha
Dangzhou grassland
34°56'54.09"N, 102°53'8.74"E
Alpine meadow
X. Zhao 1813
5
O.bicolor
Tiemu Mountain
35°58'32.21"N, 104°46'31.40"E
Sunny hillside
X. Zhao 1927
6
O.racemosa
Yanchi
37°43'52.02"N, 107°23'55.77"E
Desert sandy land
X. Zhao 1946
7
O.myriophylla
Maxian Mountain
35°47'46.48"N, 103°58'12.64"E
Valley
X. Zhao 1833
Section Lycotriche
8
O.aciphylla
Jijiquan nature reserve
38°59'43"N, 101°55'39"E
Desert sandy land
X. Zhao 1924
Section Eumorpha
9
O.imbricata
Taohe river
34°33'28.66"N, 102°34'53.99"E
Riverside
X. Zhao 1940
10
O.coerulea
Taitong Mountain
35°30'8.94"N, 106°35'54.90"E
Border of Forest
X. Zhao 1832
Section Mesogaea
11
O.xinglongshanica
Xinglong Mountain
35°46'20.53"N, 104°1'2.49"E
Valley
X. Zhao 1913
12
O.glabra
Rabah Lake National Nature Reserve
37°42'3.19"N, 107°2'33.46"E
Desert sandy land
X. Zhao 1950
13
O.kansuensis
Azi Test Station of LZU
33°39'57.96"N, 101°52'22.44"E
Alpine meadow
X. Zhao 1819
14
O.melanocalyx
Guanggai Mountain
34°24'23.35"N, 102°53'58.80"E
Alpine meadow
X. Zhao 1956
15
O.taochensis
Liupan Mountain
35°33'21.81"N, 106°25'21.54"E
Border of Forest
X. Zhao 1838
16
O.ochrocephala
Xinglong Mountain
35°47'5.17"N, 104°0'0.67"E
Beside farmland
X. Zhao 1828
17
O.ochrocephala
Dangzhou grassland
34°56'54.11"N, 102°53'8.81"E
Alpine meadow
X. Zhao 1812
Section Oxytropis
18
O.latibracteata
Helan Mountain
38°39'46.59"E 105°49'20.25"N
Border of Forest
X. Zhao 1951
Section Leucopodia
19
O.squammulosa
Shaochagou
35°42'57.20"N, 105°2'21.20"E
Arid steppe
X. Zhao 1928
Leaf epidermal terminology was based on the classification proposed by Dilcher (1974) and Wilkinson (1980). Stomatal index (SI) was calculated using the following equation:
SI = S/E + S (1)
where, SI is the stomatal index, S is the number of stomata per unit area, and E is the number of epidermal cells per unit area. Stomatal density (SD) was expressed as the number of stomata per unit leaf area.
Data analysis
Statistical data was processed by the Origin 2021 software (OriginLab Corporation 2021). The raw data matrix includes quantitative and qualitative characters, and qualitative traits were coded using a presence/absence (0/1) matrix (Table 2). The Euclidean distance is one of the most commonly used distance measurement methods in hierarchical clustering, which can reflect the absolute difference of individual numerical characteristics and is suitable for the analysis that needs to reflect the difference from the numerical size of the dimension (Raymond and Sylvia 1993; Farhana and Safwana 2018). The Ward error sum of squares method applies the idea of ANOVA to classification, and the obtained clustering information is more abundant and rarely affected by abnormal data (Ward 1963; Szekely and Rizzo 2005). Therefore, the Ward’s method was used for cluster analysis using the squared Euclidean distance to interpret the morpho-anatomical similarity among species in this study.
Matrix of qualitative leaf epidermal characters of Oxytropis species.
Species
Adaxial epidermis
Abaxial epidermis
Shape of trichromes
Ornamentation of trichromes
Inner margin of outer stomatal rim
Ornamentation of outer stomatal rim
Waxy layer of epidermal cells
Shape of cells
Pattern of anticlinal walls
Shape of trichromes
Ornamentation of trichromes
Inner margin of outer stomatal rim
Ornamentation of outer stomatal rim
Waxy layer of epidermal cells
Shape of cells
Pattern of anticlinal walls
O.ciliata
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
O.muricata
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
O.falcata
1
1
0
0
2
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
O.ochrantha
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
3
O.bicolor
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
3
O.racemosa
1
1
0
0
2
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
O.myriophylla
1
0
0
0
1
1
2
1
0
0
0
2
1
2
O.aciphylla
1
1
0
2
2
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
1
2
O.imbricata
1
1
0
0
0
1
2
1
1
0
1
1
1
2
O.coerulea
1
1
0
3
0
0
0
2
0
0
3
0
0
1
O.xinglongshanica
1
1
0
2
2
1
2
1
1
0
2
2
1
2
O.glabra
1
1
1
0
1
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
O.kansuensis
1
1
0
0
0
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
O.melanocalyx
1
1
0
2
2
1
2
1
1
0
1
1
0
3
O.taochensis
1
1
0
2
2
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
O.ochrocephala (XLS)
1
1
0
2
2
1
2
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
O.ochrocephala (HZ)
1
1
0
2
2
1
2
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
O.latibracteata
1
1
1
1
1
0
3
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
O.squammulosa
2
2
0
0
0
0
3
2
2
0
0
0
0
1
Note: Shape of trichromes: strip-like 0, cylindrical 1, absent 2; Ornamentation of trichromes: striation 0, striation and granular 1, absent 2; Inner margin of outer stomatal rim: undulate 0, smooth 1; Ornamentation of outer stomatal rim: granular 0, smooth 1, scale-like 2, banded sediment 3; Waxy layer of epidermal cells: granular 0, smooth 1, scale-like 2; Shape of cells: irregular 0, polygonal 1; Pattern of anticlinal walls: sinuate 0, sinuolate 1, straight arched 2, Undulate 3.
ResultsEpidermal cell characters
Epidermal cell traits varied within a wide range. The shape varied from polygonal to irregular with straight arched, sinuolate, undulate, and sinuate wall patterns (Table 3; Figs 2–4). Polygonal cells with straight-arched walls were common in most taxa and were predominant in O.racemosa, O.glabra, O.kansuensis, O.melanocalyx, O.taochensis, O.ochrocephala (XLS), O.ochrocephala (HZ), O.myriophylla, O.aciphylla, O.imbricata, O.xinglongshanica, and O.ciliata (Figs 2–4). In turn, irregular sinuolate walls were predominant in O.ciliata, O.muricata, O.ochrantha, O.bicolor, and O.coerulea (Figs 2, 3), and irregular undulate walls were predominant in O.latibracteata, O.squammulosa, O.ochrantha, O.bicolor, O.racemosa, O.glabra, O.kansuensis, O.melanocalyx, and O.taochensis (Figs 2–4). Lastly, irregular sinuate walls were predominant in O.falcata, O.muricata, O.coerulea, O.ochrocephala (XLS), O.ochrocephala (HZ), O.latibracteata, and O.squammulosa (Figs 2–4).
Characteristics of the leaf epidermis of Oxytropis under light microscopy (surface view).
Light microscope photographs of epidermal cells in Oxytropis DC. A, B adaxial and abaxial epidermall cells of O.ciliataC, D adaxial and abaxial epidermall cells of O.muricataE, F adaxial and abaxial epidermall cells of O.falcataG, H adaxial and abaxial epidermall cells of O.ochranthaI, J adaxial and abaxial epidermall cells of O.bicolorK, L adaxial and abaxial epidermall cells of O.racemosa.
Light microscope photographs of epidermal cells in Oxytropis DC. A, B adaxial and abaxial epidermall cells of O.myriophyllaC, D adaxial and abaxial epidermall cells of O.aciphyllaE, F adaxial and abaxial epidermall cells of O.imbricataG, H adaxial and abaxial epidermall cells of O.coeruleaI, J adaxial and abaxial epidermall cells of O.xinglongshanicaK, L adaxial and abaxial epidermall cells of O.glabra.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/704269
In addition, SEM analysis showed that, based on the shape, the waxy layer on epidermal cells could be separated into three groups (Table 4): a smooth waxy layer was found in epidermal cells of O.ciliata, O.muricata, O.bicolor, O.myriophylla, O.glabra, O.ochrantha, O.ochrocephala (XLS), O.ochrocephala (HZ), O.imbricata, O.melanocalyx, and O.latibracteata (Figs 5–9); a granular waxy layer was observed in those of O.ochrantha, O.imbricata, O.kansuensis, O.racemosa, O.muricata, O.falcata, O.aciphylla, O.glabra, O.kansuensis, O.ochrocephala (XLS), O.ochrocephala (HZ), and O.squammulosa (Figs 5–9), and finally, a scale-like waxy layer was observed in epidermal cells of O.falcata, O.racemosa, O.aciphylla, O.xinglongshanica, O.melanocalyx, O.taochensis, O.ochrocephala (XLS), and O.ochrocephala (HZ) (Figs 5–9).
Stomatal characters on the epidermis
With respect to stomata, all species of Oxytropis studied here were anomocytic, and stomatal index (SI) and stomatal density (SD) of the adaxial epidermis were greater than those of the abaxial epidermis (Table 3). In most of the examined species, remarkable variation was observed in stomatal size and number. Specifically, SD was lowest in O.coerulea (Table 3; Fig. 3) and largest in O.melanocalyx (Table 3; Fig. 4). Meanwhile, SI was highest (0.26) in O.melanocalyx, and lowest (0.003) on the abaxial surface of O.coerulea (Table 3; Figs 3, 4). Stomatal size was largest in O.muricata and smallest in O.aciphylla (Table 3; Figs 2, 3). As per SEM observation, the inner margin of the outer stomatal rim was either undulate or smooth (Table 4). Five species, including O.ciliata, O.muricata, O.ochrantha, O.glabra, and O.latibracteata, showed smooth and undulating inner margins of the outer stomatal ledge (Figs 5, 7, 9), while O.bicolor showed only a smooth inner margin of the outer stomatal ledge (Figs 5, 6). In contrast, the remaining species had an undulate inner margin of the outer stomatal ledge. Ornamentation of the outer stomatal ledge was smooth or granular in most species under this study. O.coerulea was a notable exception with a banded sediment ornamentation of the outer stomatal ledge (Fig. 7).
Light microscope photographs of epidermal cells in Oxytropis DC. A, B adaxial and abaxial epidermall cells of O.kansuensisC, D adaxial and abaxial epidermall cells of O.melanocalyxE, F adaxial and abaxial epidermall cells of O.taochensisG, H adaxial and abaxial epidermall cells of O.ochrocephala (XLS) I, J adaxial and abaxial epidermall cells of O.ochrocephala (HZ) K, L adaxial and abaxial epidermall cells of O.latibracteataM, N adaxial and abaxial epidermall cells of O.squammulosa.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/704270Trichome characters on the epidermis
Most of the species observed showed trichomes, except for O.squammulosa (Table 4; Fig. 9). Two trichome shapes were identified in this genus. Strip-like trichomes, that were present only in O.ciliata (Table 4; Fig. 5), and cylindrical trichomes, that were present in all other species (Table 4). Trichrome ornamentation of O.ochrantha, O.ciliata, and O.myriophylla was striate (Table 4; Figs 5, 6), while the remaining species were striate and granular (Table 4).
Characteristics of the leaf epidermis of Oxytropis under scanning electron microscopy.
Scanning electron microscope photographs of epidermal cells in Oxytropis DC. A–C adaxial epidermall cells of O.ciliataD, E abaxial epidermall cells of O.ciliataF–H adaxial epidermall cells of O.muricataI–K abaxial epidermall cells of O.muricataL–N adaxial epidermall cells of O.falcataO–Q abaxial epidermall cells of O.falcataR–T adaxial epidermall cells of O.ochrantha. U–W abaxial epidermall cells of O.ochranthaX adaxial epidermall cells of O.bicolor.
Scanning electron microscope photographs of epidermal cells in Oxytropis DC. A, B adaxial epidermall cells of O.bicolorC–E abaxial epidermall cells of O.bicolorF–H adaxial epidermall cells of O.racemosaI–K abaxial epidermall cells of O.racemosaL–N adaxial epidermall cells of O.myriophyllaO–Q abaxial epidermall cells of O.myriophyllaR–T adaxial epidermall cells of O.aciphyllaU–W abaxial epidermall cells of O.aciphyllaX adaxial epidermall cells of O.imbricata.
Cluster analysis reflects the similarity among species based on anatomical characteristics and delimitation of these groups. The phenograms of the quantitative and qualitative data provided four principal clusters (Fig. 10). In the first cluster, O.ciliata, O.ochrantha, and O.bicolor were closely related; in turn, the second cluster included four taxa, O.falcata, O.muricata, O.latibracteata, and O.squammulosa. The third cluster comprised O.racemosa, O.glabra, O.kansuensis, O.aciphylla, O.melanocalyx, O.taochensis, O.ochrocephala (XLS), O.ochrocephala (HZ), O.xinglongshanica, O.myriophylla, and O.imbricata. Lastly, the fourth cluster contained only O.coerulea, which was characterized by banded sediments in the outer stomatal ledge.
Scanning electron microscope photographs of epidermal cells in Oxytropis DC. A, B adaxial epidermall cells of O.imbricataC–E abaxial epidermall cells of O.imbricataF–H adaxial epidermall cells of O.coeruleaI, J abaxial epidermall cells of O.coeruleaK–M adaxial epidermall cells of O.xinglongshanicaN–P abaxial epidermall cells of O.xinglongshanicaQ–S adaxial epidermall cells of O.glabraT–V abaxial epidermall cells of O.glabraW–X adaxial epidermall cells of O.kansuensis.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/704273Discussion
Leaf characteristics, such as epidermal micro- and macro-hairs, and stomata, are important for the classification of many genera (Dickison 2000; Yang and Lin 2005; Kadiri and Muellner-Riehl 2021). Previous studies have shown that the anatomical features of the leaf epidermis, such as the shape and anticlinal walls of epidermal cells, are taxonomically significant and can therefore be used for the classification of taxa at the genus or even at the species level (Barthlott et al. 1998; Wissemann 2000; Tomaszewski and Zieliński 2014; Tomaszewski et al. 2019). In this study, there were two main types of leaf epidermal cells: polygonal and irregular; and four different types of pattern of anticlinal walls: straight-arched, sinuolate, undulate, and sinuate. It has been proposed that the pattern of the anticlinal wall may be influenced by habitat; specifically, species in dry environments tend to have a straight arched anticlinal wall, whereas those in humid areas tend to have undulating to sinuous anticlinal walls (Stace 1965; Gifford and Foster 1989). However, in this study, O.muricata, O.falcata, O.ochrantha, O.bicolor, and O.squammulosa specimens growing in an arid environment exhibited undulate to sinuous anticlinal walls, whereas O.taochensis and O.ochrocephala specimens found in humid environments exhibited straight arched anticlinal walls. Therefore, our results do not support the aforementioned hypothesis. A similar phenomenon was observed in the study of leaf epidermal traits in Piperales (Song et al. 2020). Furthermore, the shape and anticlinal walls of epidermal cells in O.ochrocephala were highly consistent in different populations, indicating that the shape of epidermal cells and the pattern of anticlinal walls were constant within species. Notably, O.ochrocephala and O.kansuensis are two species easily confused within Oxytropis, as they are morphologically difficult to distinguish and they are both abundant in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau region (Zhu et al. 2010). However, according to our observations, these two species can be distinguished based on their wall pattern: O.ochrocephala has a sinuate anticlinal wall pattern, whereas O.kansuensis has an undulating wall pattern. Thus, anticlinal wall pattern might be considered as a useful taxonomic marker for some Oxytropis species. However, similar epidermal cell shapes and anticlinal wall patterns exist in other species of the genus Oxytropis and other groups of Fabaceae (Zou et al. 2008; Ren et al. 2007). Therefore, epidermal cell shape and anticlinal wall patterns need to be considered in combination with other macro-morphological features classifying the species within the genus Oxytropis.
Scanning electron microscope photographs of epidermal cells in Oxytropis DC. A adaxial epidermall cells of O.kansuensisB–D abaxial epidermall cells of O.kansuensisE–G adaxial epidermall cells of O.melanocalyxH–J abaxial epidermall cells of O.melanocalyxK–M adaxial epidermall cells of O.taochensisN–P abaxial epidermall cells of O.taochensisQ–S adaxial epidermall cells of O.ochrocephala (HZ) T–V abaxial epidermall cells of O.ochrocephala (HZ) W–X adaxial epidermall cells of O.ochrocephala (XLS).
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/704274
Studies on stomata can have great taxonomic significance for the delimitation of different levels of taxa (Kothari and Shah 1975). Carpenter and Smith (1975) showed that variability in stomatal frequency is taxonomically important at the genus level, whereas Carlquist (1961) emphasized the contribution of stomatal size variation to delimiting species within a genus. In Oxytropis, a wide range of variability was observed for stomatal quantitative parameters, such as stomatal density, size, and index. Our results indicated that the quantitative stomatal traits have limited taxonomic value, as they are strongly influenced by environmental factors, such as CO2 levels and light intensity (Metcalfe and Chalk 1950; Royer 2001; Rossatto and Kolb 2010). However, stomatal distribution and types are considered an important taxonomic criterion for taxonomic value, especially at higher taxa (Metcalfe and Chalk 1950; Patil and Patil 1987). Thus, for example, we found that the anomocytic stomata type is a common feature in Oxytropis that may be used to elaborate the phylogenetic relationships among genera, in combination with stomatal data from other genera. These findings support the concept that genus Oxytropis is a monophyletic group (Zhu and Ohashi 2000).
Scanning electron microscope photographs of epidermal cells in Oxytropis DC. A adaxial epidermall cells of O.ochrocephala (XLS) B–D abaxial epidermall cells of O.ochrocephala (XLS) E–G adaxial epidermall cells of O.latibracteataH–J abaxial epidermall cells of O.latibracteataK–L adaxial epidermall cells of O.squammulosaM–N abaxial epidermall cells of O.squammulosa.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/704275
Further, trichomes and their characteristics provide important information for plant identification. The type of indumentum and its presence or absence may serve as diagnostic features for species or genus recognition, as has been recognized in some groups such as Asteraceae (Adedeji and Jewoola 2008; Krak and Mráz 2008), Brassicaceae (Beilstein et al. 2006), Fabaceae (Chukwuma et al. 2014), and Lamiaceae (Eiji and Salmaki 2016). In addition, large plant taxa often share a common pattern of trichome structure. For example, chandelier-shaped trichomes with branches of whorls are characteristic of Platanaceae (Carpenter et al. 2005); peltate or scale-like hairs are typical of Eleagnaceae (Mishra 2009), and three-celled uniseriate hairs are common in Proteaceae (Johnson and Briggs 1975). In the genus Oxytropis, the trichome type of the investigated species was simple hair. This is consistent with the results of previous studies on Oxytropis (Karaman et al. 2009; Lu 2011). Furthermore, we found that O.ciliata, belonging to Section Xerobia (Zhu et al. 2010), has strip-like trichomes (margin ciliates) that distinguish this species from other species in this study. The trichrome ornamentation of most Oxytropis species was consistent, indicating that trichrome ornamentation appears to be of a low taxonomic value for distinguishing sections and species. However, owing to sample size limitations, the systematic significance of Oxytropis trichomes needs to be based on a more comprehensive sampling.
In this study, six species, including O.glabra, O.kansuensis, O.melanocalyx, O.taochensis, O.ochrocephala, and O.xinglongshanica, all belonging to section Mesogaea, clustered together. Our results of cluster analysis are largely consistent with that of the classification of species and sections based on macro morphological data (Zhu et al. 2010), indicating that leaf epidermal micro characteristics might be valuable in understanding systematics of genera at the section level. Bunge (1874) established the section Gobicola in 1874, which contained only O.racemosa. This treatment was recognized by the FRPS, but section Gobicola was merged into section Baicalia in Flora IntraMongolica and FOC (Fu 1989; Zhang 1998; Zhu et al. 2010). However, our results do not support the interpretation of Flora IntraMongolica and FOC. In this study, O.racemosa and some species of the section Mesogaea, such as O.glabra and O.kansuensis, clustered together into one clade, indicating that the systematic position of O.racemosa needs to be reconsidered (Fig. 10). In addition, based on the results of quantitative taxonomy, Wang (2005) advocated that section Leucopodia, which only contains O.squammulosa, should be merged with section Xerobia. Our results clearly do not support this treatment, because O.squammulosa did not cluster together with O.ciliata in section Xerobia (Fig. 10). Moreover, different populations of O.ochrocephala clustered together into one group, which demonstrates that leaf epidermal traits are useful for the identification of taxa at the species level. Therefore, foliar epidermis traits of Oxytropis can be used as taxonomic markers for identification at the infrageneric classification level.
The dendrogram of Oxytropis DC. based on the leaf epidermal characteristics.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/704276
There is no comprehensive phylogenetic study on the genus Oxytropis. Furthermore, although several studies have applied DNA barcodes such as ITS, trnL-F, and psbA-trnH to explore the molecular phylogeny of Oxytropis in Northwestern China, the low genetic divergence of the above barcodes among the species makes it difficult to distinguish species within the genus as well as to resolve phylogenetic relationships between sections (Li et al. 2011; Gao et al. 2013; Lu et al. 2014). Therefore, the reliability of epidermis characters in terms of phylogeny cannot be affirmed. More detailed molecular phylogenetic studies with a broader taxon sampling are required to find correlations between epidermis characteristics and classification of the genus.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that leaf epidermis can be used as potential taxonomic markers for infrageneric classification of Oxytropis. The shape of epidermal cells and the pattern of the anticlinal wall were constant within species, and are useful for species delimitation in the genus Oxytropis when combined with other macroscopic traits. Trichome shapes can be useful characteristics to distinguish O.ciliata from other investigated species. Although quantitative stomatal characteristics were not effective diagnostic characteristics because of the considerable variation within the same taxa, it nevertheless plays an important role in cluster analysis. Results of cluster analysis are largely consistent with the classification of species and sections based on macro morphological data, indicating that foliar epidermis characteristics of Oxytropis can be used as taxonomic identification markers infrageneric classification level. Lastly, our results support the delineation of the sect. Leucopodia as an independent section, while not supporting the treatment of merging the sect. Gobicola into the sect. Baicalia.
Acknowledgements
The author thanks Dr. Xiaowei Li and Mr. Xiaoxu Lyu for their help in collecting specimens in the field. Author contributions: Xiang Zhao: Conceptualization, Methodology, Sample collection, Laboratory analysis, Data analysis, Validation, Data curation, Writing-Original draft preparation. Qinzheng Hou: Methodology, Data analysis, Validation, Writing-Reviewing and Editing, Visualization. Meina Du: Sample collection, Visualization. Hui Zhang: Sample collection. Lingyun Jia: Laboratory analysis. Zhihua Zhang: Laboratory analysis. Zongqi Ma: Laboratory analysis. Kun Sun: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing-Reviewing and Editing, Supervision, Project administration. This work was supported by the Gansu Key Research and Development Project-Agriculture (grant number 18YF1NA051)
ReferencesAdedejiOJewoolaOA (2008) Importance of leaf epidermal characters in the Asteraceae family.36(2): 7–16.AlegeGOShaibuDO (2015) Phylogenetic and Systematic Value of Leaf Epidermal Characteristics in Some Members of Nigerian Fabaceae.3(2): 301–307. https://doi.org/10.3126/ijasbt.v3i2.12733AlvarezGSAmorenaGIRubialesJMMorlaC (2009) The value of leaf cuticle characteristics in the identification and classification of Iberian Mediterranean members of the genus Pinus. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 161: 436–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.01011.xArchambaultAStrömvikMV (2012) Evolutionary relationships in Oxytropis species, as estimated from the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences point to multiple expansions into the Arctic.90(8): 770–779. https://doi.org/10.1139/b2012-023AshfaqSAhmadMZafarMSultanaSBahadurSUllahFZamanWAhmedSNNazishM (2019) Foliar micromorphology of Convolvulaceous species with special emphasis on trichome diversity from the arid zone of Pakistan.255: 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2019.04.007BarthlottWNeinhuisCCutlerDDitschFMeuselITheisenIWilhelmiH (1998) Classification and terminology of plant epicuticular waxes.126(3): 237–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1998.tb02529.xBeilsteinMAAl-ShehbazIAKelloggEA (2006) Brassicaceae phylogeny and trichome evolution.93(4): 607–619. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.93.4.607BojňanskýVFargašováA (2007) Atlas of seeds and fruits of Central and East-European flora: The Carpathian Mountains region. Springer, Netherlands.BungeA (1874) Species generis Oxytropis, DC. Mémoires de l’Académie impériale des sciences de St.-Pétersbourg ser. 7, 22(1): 160.CarlquistSJ (1961) Comparative Plant Anatomy. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.CarpenterKJ (2005) Stomatal architecture and evolution in basal angiosperms.92(10): 1595–1615. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.92.10.1595CarpenterSBSmithND (1975) Stomatal distribution and size in southern Appalachian hardwoods.53(11): 1153–1156. https://doi.org/10.1139/b75-137CarpenterRJHillRSJordanGJ (2005) Leaf cuticular morphology links Platanaceae and Proteaceae.166(5): 843–855. https://doi.org/10.1086/431806CeterTErkulSKAytacZBaşerB (2013) Pollen morphology of the genus Oxytropis DC. in Turkey.42(1): 167–174. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjb.v42i1.15908ChukwumaECSoladoyeMOSalaamRA (2014) Taxonomic value of the leaf micro-morphology and quantitative phytochemistry of Clitoriaternatea and Centrosemapubescens (Papilionoideae, Fabaceae).20: 3–8.De CandolleP (1802) Astragalogia nempe Astragali, biserrulae et Oxytropidis, nec non phacae, colutae et lessertiae historia iconibus illustrate [Astragalogia, namely Astragalus, Biserrula and Oxytropis, or not, Phaca, Colutea and Lessertia, History icons illustared]. Joann Bapt Garnery, Paris. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.517DevecchiMFPiraniJRMelo-de-PinnaGFA (2014) Comparative leaf anatomy and morphology of some Brazilian species of Crotalaria L. (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Crotalarieae).28(4): 583–593. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062014abb3517DickisonWC (2000) Integrative plant anatomy. Academic Press, Cambridge (MA).DilcherDL (1974) Approaches to the identification of angiosperm leaf remains.40(1): 1–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860067DizkiriciAErkulSKAytaçZKayaZ (2016) Phylogenetic relationships between Oxytropis DC. and Astragalus L. species native to an Old World diversity center inferred from nuclear ribosomal ITS and plastid matK gene sequences.40: 250–263. https://doi.org/10.3906/biy-1502-5EijiSSalmakiY (2016) Evolution of trichomes and its systematic significance in Salvia (Mentheae; Nepetoideae; Lamiaceae).2016(180): 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12367ErkulSKCelepFAytaçZ (2015) Seed morphology and its systematic implications for genus Oxytropis DC.149(5): 875–883. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2014.969353.FarhanaHSafwanaH (2018) Plant recognition system using leaf shape features and Minimum Euclidean distance.9(2): 1919–1925. https://doi.org/10.21917/ijivp.2018.0272FuXQ (1989) Oxytropis DC. In: CommissoneRedactorum Florae Intramongilicae (Eds) Flora IntraMongolica., 299–331.GaoLXLuPJinFGaoJ (2013) trnL-F sequences and molecular phylogeny of 10 Species of Oxytropis.33(2): 266–271. [In Chinese with English abstract]GiffordEMFosterAS (1989) WH Freeman & Co, San Francisco, 626 pp.HuGXBalangcodTXiangCL (2012) Trichome micromorphology of the Chinese-Himalayan genus Colquhounia (Lamiaceae), with emphasis on taxonomic implications.67(5): 867–874. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-012-0076-zJohnsonLASBriggsBG (1975) On the Proteaceae: The evolution and classification of a southern family.70(2): 83–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1975.tb01644.xJorgensenJLStehlikIBrochmannCContiE (2003) Implications of ITS sequences and RAPD markers for the taxonomy and biogeography of the Oxytropiscampestris and O.arctica (Fabaceae) complexes in Alaska.90(10): 1470–1480. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.10.1470KadiriABMuellner-RiehlAN (2021) Comparative leaf micromorphology of Drypetes and Putranjiva (Putranjivaceae) and its taxonomic significance.195(2): 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1093/botlinnean/boaa080KaramanSSuludereZPinarMAytacZ (2009) The Leaflets Micromorphology of the Genus Oxytropis DC. (Leguminosae) in Turkey by SEM.2: 7–23.KothariMJShahGL (1975) Epidermal Structures and Ontogeny of Stomata in the Papilionaceae (Tribe Hedysareae). Botanical Gazette (Chicago, Ill.136(4): 372–379. https://doi.org/10.1086/336829KrakKMrázP (2008) Trichomes in the tribe Lactuceae (Asteraceae): Taxonomic implications.63(5): 616–630. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-008-0106-zLedinghamGF (1957) Chromosome numbers of some Saskatchewan Leguminosae with particular reference to Astragalus and Oxytropis. Canadian Journal of Botany 35(5): 657–666. https://doi.org/10.1139/b57-055LedinghamGF (1960) Chromosome numbers in Astragalus and Oxytropis. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 2(2): 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1139/g60-012LedinghamGFReverBM (1963) Chromosome numbers of some southwest Asian species of Astragalus and Oxytropis. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 5(1): 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1139/g63-003LiYFLanFRChangZYGuoZK (2011) Molecular phylogeny of Oxytropis of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau by ITS and trnL-F sequences.39(11): 188–193. [In Chinese with English abstract]LiuYHMengYYangYHYangYP (2011) Chromosome numbers and karyotypes of six Oxytropis species (Fabaceae) from the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China.33(04): 423–431. [In Chinese with English abstract]LuYM (2011) Study on taxonomy and characters of leaf epidermis of Astragalus L. and Oxytropis DC. in Altay region of Xinjiang. Master thesis, Xinjiang university, Xinjiang. [In Chinese with English abstract]LuPGaoLXJinF (2014) Molecular Phylogeny of Ten Species of Oxytropis Based on psbA-trnH Sequences.36(3): 279–284. [In Chinese with English abstract]MannethodySPurayidathkandyS (2018) Trichome micromorphology and its systematic significance in Asian Leucas (Lamiaceae).242: 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2018.03.007MartinEErkulSKAytaçZ (2015) Karyological studies on Oxytropis (Fabaceae) from Turkey.68(4): 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.2015.1109926MetcalfeCRChalkL (1950) The Clarendon Press, Oxford, 288 pp.MeyersZJIckert-BondSMLamesjerantR (2013) A survey of seed coat morphology in Oxytropis, Sects. Arctobia, Baicalia, glaeocephala, Mesogaea, and Orobia (Fabaceae) from Alaska.7(1): 391–404.MishraSR (2009) Discovery publishing house, New Delhi, 348 pp.NisaSUShahSAMumtazASSultanA (2019) Stomatal novelties in Vincetoxicumarnottianum (Asclepiadeae:Asclepiadoideae: Apocynaceae). Flora 260: e151464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2019.151464OriginLab Corporation (2021) Origin (Pro) (Version 2021, Learning edition). Northampton, MA, USA.PatilSGPatilVP (1987) Stomatal studies in the genus Chlorophytum and their taxonomic significance.37: 155–158.Peter-StibalE (1937) Revision der chinesischen Astragalus und Oxytropis. Arten Acta Hort Gotobung 12: 68–82.PolhillRM (1981) Tribe 16. Galegeae (Bronn). In: PolhillRMRavenPH (Eds) Advances in Legume Systematics, part 1., 357–363.RanjbarMKaramianRBayatS (2010) New chromosome counts in five species of Oxytropis (Fabaceae) in Iran.16(1): 42–48.RashidNZafarMAhmadMKhanMAMalikKSultanaSShahSN (2019) Taxonomic significance of leaf epidermis in tribe Trifolieae L. (Leguminosae; Papilionoideae) in Pakistan.153(3): 406–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2018.1492995RaymondDRSylviaRM (1993) Squared Euclidean distance: a statistical test to evaluate plant community change. Research Note, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.2737/PSW-RN-416RenBZhuXYJiangYC (2007) Systematic significance of leaf epidermal features in Apios and Cochlianthus (Leguminosae).45(3): 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1360/aps050016RossattoDRKolbRM (2010) Gochnatiapolymorpha (Less.) Cabrera (Asteraceae) changes in leaf structure due to differences in light and edaphic conditions.24(3): 605–612. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062010000300002RoyerDL (2001) Stomatal density and stomatal index as indicators of paleoatmospheric CO2 concentration.114(1–2): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-6667(00)00074-9ShaheenSFatehRYounisSHarunNJafferMHussainKAshfaqMSiddiqueRMukhtarHKhanF (2020) Light and scanning electron microscopic characterization of thirty endemic Fabaceae species of district Lahore, Pakistan.83(12): 1507–1529. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23545SilvaNFArrudaRDCOAlvesFMSartoriÂLB (2018) Leaflet anatomy of the Dipterygeae clade (Faboideae: Fabaceae): evolutionary implications and systematics.187(1): 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1093/botlinnean/boy009SolumDJLockermanRH (1991) Seed coat surface patterns and structures of Oxytropisriparia, Oxytropiscampestris, Medicagosativa, and Astragaluscicer. Scanning Microscopy 5: 779–786.SongJHYangSChoiG (2020) Taxonomic Implications of Leaf Micromorphology Using Microscopic Analysis: A Tool for Identification and Authentication of Korean Piperales. Plants (Basel) 9(5): e566. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9050566StaceCA (1965) Cuticular studies as an aid to plant taxonomy. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History).4: 3–78.StengleinSAArambarriAMColaresMNNovoaMCVizcaínoCE (2003) Leaf epidermal characteristics of LotussubgenusAcmispon (Fabaceae: Loteae) and a numerical taxonomic evaluation.81(9): 933–944. https://doi.org/10.1139/b03-090SzekelyGRizzoM (2005) Hierarchical Clustering via Joint Between-Within Distances: Extending Ward’s Minimum Variance Method.22(2): 151–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-005-0012-9TianXBBaiZMKlempererSLLiangXFLiuZWangXYangXSWeiYHZhuGH (2021) Crustal-scale wedge tectonics at the narrow boundary between the Tibetan Plateau and Ordos block. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 554: e116700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116700TomaszewskiDZielińskiJ (2014) Epicuticular wax structures on stems and comparison between stems and leaves-A survey.209(5–6): 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2014.03.001TomaszewskiDByaltAGawlakM (2019) Leaf and stem epicuticular wax structures in Lonicera species (Caprifoliaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 37(5): e02210. https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.02210WangJN (2005) The taxonomical study of Oxytropis DC. in Inner Mongolia. Master thesis, Inner Mongolia normal university, Inner Mongolia. [In Chinese with English abstract]WangFTTangT (1955) Flora Illustralis Plantarum Primarum Sinicarum: Leguminosae. Science Press, Beijing. [In Chinese]WardJr JH (1963) Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function.58(301): 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845WebsterGLDel-Arco-AguilarMJSmithBA (1996) Systematic distribution of foliar trichome types in Croton (Euphorbiaceae).121(1): 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1996.tb00744.xWilkinsonHP (1980) The plant surface (mainly leaf). In: MetcalfeCRChalkL (Eds) Anatomy of the dicotyledons I., 97–165.WissemannV (2000) Epicuticular wax morphology and the taxonomy of Rosa (section Caninae, subsection Rubiginosae).2000(221): 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01086384YangZRLinQ (2005) Comparative morphology of the leaf epidermis in Schisandra (Schisandraceae).148(1): 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2005.00396.xYangYZhangLYLiuBvan der WerffH (2012) Leaf cuticular anatomy and taxonomy of Syndiclis (Lauraceae) and its allies.37(4): 861–878. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364412X656518ZhangCW (1998) Oxytropis DC. In: Editing Committee of Chinese Flora (Eds) Flora Reipublicae Polularis Sinicae., 1–146. [In Chinese]ZhuXYOhashiH (2000) Systematics of Chinese Oxytropis DC. (Leguminosae). In: HongDY (Ed.) Cathaya 11–12., 1–218.ZhuXYWelshSLOhashiH (2010) Oxytropis DC. In: Editorial Committee of Flora of China (Eds) Flora of China., 453–500.ZouPLiaoJPZhangDX (2008) Leaf epidermal micromorphology of Cercis (Fabaceae: Caesalpinioideae).158(3): 539–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2008.00877.x