3urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:F7FCE910-8E78-573F-9C77-7788555F8AADPhytoKeysPK1314-20111314-2003Pensoft Publishers10.3897/phytokeys.111.2808128081Research ArticlePoaceaePhylogenyTaxonomyAsiaPhylogeny and taxonomic synopsis of PoasubgenusPseudopoa (including Eremopoa and Lindbergella) (Poaceae, Poeae, Poinae)GillespieLynn J.14lgillespie@mus-nature.cahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3129-434XSorengRobert John2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8358-4915CabiEvren3AmiriNeda14Research and Collections Division, Canadian Museum of Nature, P.O. Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 6P4, CanadaCanadian Museum of NatureOttawaCanadaDepartment of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USAUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanadaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, Tekirdağ, TurkeySmithsonian InstitutionWashingtonUnited States of AmericaDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, CanadaTekirdağ Namık Kemal UniversityTekirdağTurkey
Corresponding author: Lynn J. Gillespie (lgillespie@nature.ca)
Academic editor: C. Morden
201814112018111691023B48FF84-FFA1-ED3B-741C-FF88FFC49E4614937192906201805102018This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC0 Public Domain Dedication.
Eremopoa is a small genus of annual grasses distributed from Egypt to western China. Phylogenetic analyses of plastid and nuclear ribosomal DNA show that Eremopoa species, together with the monotypic genus Lindbergella and a single species of Poa (P.speluncarum), are nested within the genus Poa, in a clade that we accept as Poasubg.Pseudopoa. Here we accept seven species, four subspecies and four varieties in Poasubg.Pseudopoa. Five new combinations are made: Poaattalica, P.diaphora var. alpina, P.diaphora var. songarica, P.nephelochloides and P.persicasubsp.multiradiata; P.millii is proposed as a replacement name for E.capillaris; and Poa sections Lindbergella and Speluncarae are proposed. We provide a diagnosis for Poasubg.Pseudopoa, synonymy for and a key to the taxa. Eight lectotypes are designated: Eragrostisbarbeyi Post, Eremopoanephelochloides Roshev., Glyceriataurica Steud., Nephelochloatripolitana Boiss. & Blanche, Poacilicensis Hance, Poaparadoxa Kar. & Kir., Poapersicavar.alpina Boiss and Poapersicasubsp.cypria Sam. Eremopoamedica is re-identified as a species of Puccinellia.
Gillespie LJ, Soreng RJ, Cabi E, Amiri N (2018) Phylogeny and taxonomic synopsis of Poa subgenus Pseudopoa (including Eremopoa and Lindbergella) (Poaceae, Poeae, Poinae). PhytoKeys 111: 69–102. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.111.28081
Introduction
Eremopoa Roshev. is a small, primarily west and central Asian genus of annual grasses. Roshevitz (1934) named the genus Eremopoa (Greek: eremos = desert, poa = fodder / > bluegrass) and included six species of annuals for the former U.S.S.R. Up to that time, one or more of the taxa had been described or treated in Aira L. (Trinius 1835), Eragrostis Wolf (Post and Autran 1897), Festuca L. (Koch 1848), Glyceria R. Br. (Fischer and Meyer 1841, Steudel 1854), Nephelochloa Boiss. (Grisebach 1852, Boissier and Blanche 1859) and Poa L. (Trinius 1830, 1836, Steudel 1854, Boissier 1884, Hackel 1887, Stapf 1897, Ascherson and Graebner 1900). Poapersica Trin. is the type species of Eremopoa, Festucasect.Pseudopoa K. Koch, Poasubgen.Pseudopoa (K. Koch) Stapf and P.sect.Pseudopoa (K. Koch) Hack. After Eremopoa was described, most authors accepted the genus (Grossheim 1939, Köie 1945, Bor 1960, 1968a, 1970, Pavlov and Gamajunova 1964, Tzvelev 1966, 1976, 1989, Scholz 1980, 1981, Tutin 1980, Czerepanov 1981, 1995, Cope 1982, Mill 1985, Clayton and Renvoize 1986, Watson and Dallwitz 1992, Soreng 2003, Valdés and Scholz 2006, Darbyshire 2007, Cabi and Doğan 2012, Nikiforova et al. 2012). Few taxonomists continued to refer the species to Poa (Samuelsson 1950, Kovalevskaja 1968). No revision of the genus as a whole exists.
Roshevitz (1934) differentiated the genus Eremopoa from Poa as: always annuals with long panicle branches arranged in half-whorls; glumes unequal, inferior 1-veined, superior 3-veined; lemmas with obscure keel and lateral veins, apex acuminate or briefly aristate; and callus without lanate hairs. Tzvelev (1976) added the following characteristics: lower glumes 2/7–2/3 the first lemma in length; lemmas somewhat keeled with 5 veins, apex gradually tapering, sometimes with a short cusp, somewhat scabrous due to very short spinules and often pilose in the lower part along the keel and marginal veins; callus obtuse, glabrous or almost glabrous; leaf sheaths closed only at the base and leaf blades flat or loosely folded. The genus is relatively easy to recognise as a set of annuals, whereas Poa has few annuals and those are distinct from species included in Eremopoa. However, none of the characters by themselves actually differentiates Eremopoa from Poa. In Poa, glumes can also be short, the lower one is commonly 1-veined, the upper one normally 3-veined. Lemmas in Poa are usually distinctly keeled, with soft hairs at least on the keel and with an obtuse, acute or acuminate apex. They are rarely weakly keeled (e.g. in sect. Secundae), sometimes glabrous (ca. 15% of spp.) and rarely produce a minute cusp (a cusp occurs more often than acknowledged in the literature, but is usually irregularly expressed). In Poa, a dorsal tuft of hairs on the callus is present in 2/3 of the species. In the other species, the callus is sometimes glabrous or has a minute or more developed crown of hairs around the base of the lemma. In addition, Poa leaf sheaths are only infrequently closed at the base, most being closed more than 1/10 the length, and leaf blade form runs the gamut from flat and thin to tough and involute. Panicle branches in Poa are infrequently whorled with 6 or up to 9 branches per lower node, the normal range is 1 to 5. Although panicle branches are commonly numerous (ranging up to 27) in Eremopoa, with most taxa usually having over 5, E.altaica (Trin.) Roshev. has 1–5(–7) and E.songarica (Schrenk ex Fisch. & C.A. Mey.) Roshev. varies widely with (1–)3–8(–12). Eremopoa species are annual with some extreme features usually not found in Poa, but, other than abundantly branching panicles, those characteristics are broached in all cases. No one has doubted that Eremopoa was closely related to Poa.
The taxa placed in Eremopoa range from Egypt (Sinai and north coast) across the northern Middle East (Israel, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Turkey [Anatolia], Iran), to Afghanistan, Pakistan, northwest India (Himachal Pradesh, Kashmir), western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), north through Transcaucasia into the Caucasus mountains of Russia and across central Asia in Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyz Republic and Kazakhstan. Two taxa have been observed elsewhere as waifs: E.persica in western Europe (France, Norway) and E.altaica (Trin.) Roshev. in Canada (see references in Taxonomy section). The geographic region with the most diversity of Eremopoa taxa is clearly Asia Minor; nearly all of the accepted species occur in Turkey.
There have been many differences of opinion on the species and infraspecific ranks to accept in Eremopoa (Table 1). Roshevitz (1934) treated six species in his new genus in the former U.S.S.R (E.altaica, E.bellula (Regel) Roshev., E.oxyglumis (Boiss.) Roshev., E.multiradiata (Trautv.) Roshev., E.persica and E.songarica). Tzvelev (1976) reduced these six species to two species, E.persica and E.altaica, with two and three subspecies, respectively, all of which were accepted as species by Czerepanov (1981, 1995). Scholz (1980, 1981) described two new species, E.attalica H. Scholz from Turkey and E.medica H. Scholz from Azerbaijan. The type of E.medica (holotype at W, isotype at B) was determined to be a species of Puccinellia Parl. (Soreng pers. obs. 2015). Mill (1985) treated six species in Turkey, including two new species, E.capillaris R.R. Mill and E.mardinensis R.R. Mill. Rahmanian et al. (2014) accepted four species in Iran, including E.medica and E.persica with three varieties.
Classification history of Eremopoa and other taxa here accepted in Poasubg.Pseudopoa. Species and infraspecific taxa accepted by Roshevitz (1934) and authors of major floras and the region covered by their treatments are given. The last column provides the corresponding names in Poa accepted here.
Roshevits (1934)
Roshevits (in Köie 1945)
Bor (1970)
Tzvelev (1976, 1983)
Cope (1982)
Mill (1985)
Czerepanov (1995)
Zhu et al. (2006)
Gabrieljan and Oganesian (2010)
Rhamanian et al. (2014)
Euro+Med (on-line)
Here
USSR
SW Iran
Iran, Afghanistan, w. Pakistan, n.w. Iraq, s. Turkmenistan, s.e. Azerbaijan
USSR
Pakistan
Turkey
USSR
China (Xinjiang, Xizang)
Armenia
Iran
Europe, Transcaucasia, Turkey, Levant, North Africa
whole range
E.persica
E.persica
E.persica
E.persica
E.persica
E.persica
E.persica
–
E.persica
E.persica
E.persica
Poapersica
–
–
var. persica
subsp. persica
subsp. persica
–
–
–
–
var. persica
–
subsp. persica
–
var. major
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
E.multiradiata
–
(= var. songarica)
subsp. multiradiata
subsp. multiradiata
E.multiradiata
E.multiradiata
–
E.multiradiata
(= persicavar.persica)
E.multiradiata
subsp. multiradiata
E.altaica
–
–
E.altaica
E.altaica
–
E.altaica
P.diaphora
–
–
E.altaica
P.diaphora
–
–
subsp. altaica
subsp. altaica
–
–
subsp. diaphora
–
–
subsp. altaica
subsp. diaphora
var. diaphora
E.songarica
–
var. songarica
subsp. songarica
subsp. songarica
E.songarica
E.songarica
–
E.songarica
var. songarica
subsp. songarica
var. songarica
E.bellula
–
E.bellula
(pp. = altaica, pp = songarica)
(= altaica s.l.)
(indirectly referenced, not accepted)
(pp. = altaica, pp = songarica)
–
–
E.bellula
–
(= var. alpina?)
P.persicavar.alpina (under oxyglumis)
–
–
–
(indirectly referenced, not accepted)
–
–
–
–
–
var. alpina
E.oxyglumis
E.oxyglumis
(= var. songarica)
subsp. oxyglumis
subsp. oxyglumis
(=E.songarica)
E.oxyglumis
subsp. oxyglumis
E.oxyglumis
E.persicavar.oxyglumis
subsp. oxyglumis
subsp. oxyglumis
–
–
–
–
–
E.attalica
–
–
–
–
E.attalica
P.attalica
–
–
–
–
–
E.capillaris
–
–
–
–
E.capillaris
P.millii
–
–
–
–
–
E.mardinensis
–
–
–
–
E.mardinensis
(= P.persicasubsp.multiradiata)
–
E.nephelochloides
–
–
–
E.nephelochloides (Iran)
–
–
–
E.nephelochloides
–
P.nephelochloides
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
E.medica
–
(= Puccinellia sp.)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
P.sintenisii
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
P.speluncarum
Bor’s genus Lindbergella (Bor 1968b, 1969) comprises a single annual species that is morphologically similar to Eremopoa. It differs from Eremopoa only in having firmer lemmas that are 3-veined and obscurely apiculate and panicles with 1–5 branches that are smooth. Lindbergellasintenisii (H. Lindb.) Bor was originally published as Poasintenisii by Lindberg (1942) and also as P.persicavar.cypria by Samuelsson (1950), the type of which is a syntype of P.persicavar.alpinaBoissier (1884). The species is endemic to Cyprus.
The first molecular data on Eremopoa, generated by our lab in 2004/2005, indicated that E.songarica was nested within Poa. That data was first published by Gillespie et al. (2007) using chloroplast DNA sequences from the trnT-trnL-trnF region. Based on this same data, inclusion of Eremopoa in Poa was already applied in the Flora of China account (Zhu et al. 2006, as P.subg.Pseudopoa (K. Koch) Stapf) and was continued in Gillespie et al. (2008, 2010), Soreng (2004+) and Soreng et al. (2010, 2015a, 2017a). Although nested within Poa, Eremopoa was positioned on a long branch separate from other Poa clades, justifying its recognition as a distinct subgenus, P.subg.Pseudopoa (Gillespie et al. 2007).
We published our initial DNA results for only one species of Eremopoa (E.songarica) based on trnT-trnL-trnF and, subsequently, nuclear ribosomal (nrDNA) ITS and ETS sequence data (Gillespie et al. 2007, 2008, 2010, Soreng et al. 2010). We subsequently sequenced two additional plastid regions (matK and rpoB-trnC) and added data for Eremopoapersica (Cabi et al. 2017, as Poapersica). A DNA analysis of ITS sequence data by Hoffmann et al. (2013) showed Lindbergellasintenisii was also nested within Poa near Eremopoa. Since then, we have accumulated nrDNA and plastid sequence data for most of the Eremopoa taxa and L.sintenisii and sampled many more species of Poa from Turkey and around the world. Analysis of our accumulated phylogenetic data on Eremopoa is presented here. All Eremopoa taxa were nested well within Poa, and P.speluncarum J.R. Edm. and L.sintenisii were found to be nested within or sister to the set of Eremopoa species. Here we place these taxa in Poasubg.Pseudopoa and present a taxonomic synopsis of all the species and infraspecies, as well as a key to the taxa we currently accept. Further study is needed before a comprehensive revision of the subgenus can be produced.
Methods
Collections of Eremopoa at E and G (except those not available for loan), several from P and two type specimens from BM and B were loaned to RJS at US. Other material was examined by RJS at B, K, LE, P, US and herbaria in Turkey (ANK, ISTE, NKU). Fieldwork in which 38 specimens of Eremopoa were collected by us was conducted in Kyrgyz Republic (RJS 2006) and Turkey (RJS and associates 1994, 2013, 2014, 2015; LJG & RJS and associates 2011; EC was a co-collector on the 2011 to 2015 expeditions). Additional material was obtained from R. Hand (Lindbergellasintenisii) and M. Assadi and M. Amini-Rad (Iranian Eremopoa).
The molecular phylogenetic analysis included 77 samples: 15 Eremopoa, 56 Poa, 1 Lindbergella and 5 outgroup samples (Appendix 1). A diverse set of Poa species was chosen to represent the majority of sections, including all sections in southwest Asia. Outgroup taxa were chosen to include representatives of the two taxa (Phleum L. and Milium L.) and one clade considered most closely related to Poa (Gillespie et al. 2010, Soreng et al. 2015b). Sequences of Lindbergella and the majority of Eremopoa samples, plus many matK and rpoB sequences, are new to this study (Appendix 1). For simplicity, due to the confusing taxonomy and nomenclature, we refer to Eremopoa taxa using names at the species level in the Results, trees and Appendix 1 (see Table 1 for their corresponding names in Poa). The collection TARI 135082 was previously identified as E.medica (Rahmanian et al. 2014), but was re-determined by RJS as P.persicasubsp.persica.
DNA was extracted from silica gel dried or herbarium leaf material as described in Gillespie et al. (2008). Three plastid markers (matK, rpoB-trnC and trnT-trnL-trnF [TLF]) and two nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) markers (internal transcribed spacer [ITS] and external transcribed spacer [ETS]) were sequenced. Amplification and sequencing protocols, including primers used, were described in our previous studies, as follows: ITS and TLF (Gillespie et al. 2008); ETS (Gillespie et al. 2009, 2010); matK and rpoB-trnC (Soreng et al. 2015b). Sequences were assembled, edited, aligned and concatenated using Geneious ver. 6.1.5 (http://www.geneious.com). The MAFFT ver. 7.017 plugin (Katoh and Standley 2013) was used for alignment, followed by manual adjustment. All samples are complete for all markers, except for several samples with missing ends. The molecular study was conducted at the Canadian Museum of Nature; sequencing was mostly performed by NA, analyses by LJG.
Maximum parsimony (MP) analyses were performed in PAUP* 4.0b10 (Swofford 2002) using the heuristic search command with default settings, including tree bisection-reconnection (TBR) swapping, saving all multiple shortest trees (Multrees) with a maximum number set to 100,000. Branch support was assessed using MP bootstrap analyses performed in PAUP* with heuristic search strategy, 10,000 bootstrap replicates, each with ten random addition sequence replicates, saving ten trees per replicate.
Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo analyses were conducted in MrBayes (Ronquist et al. 2011). Optimal models of molecular evolution for individual markers were first determined using the Akaike information criterion (AIC; Akaike 1974) conducted through likelihood searches in jModeltest with default settings (Darriba et al. 2012). Models were set at GTR + Γ for ITS, ETS and rpoB-trnC partitions and GTR + I + Γ for matK and TLF partitions based on the AIC scores and the models allowed in MrBayes. Two independent runs of four chained searches were performed for either two or three million generations (analyses were stopped when split frequency of 0.005 was reached or closely approached), sampling every 500 generations, with default parameters. A 25% burn-in was implemented prior to summarising a 50% majority rule consensus tree and calculating Bayesian posterior probabilities (pp).
MP heuristic searches and bootstrap analyses were performed initially on the separate marker alignments. Strict consensus trees were examined for conflicting topologies with incongruence identified by branch conflicts with ≥75% bootstrap support (BS). No supported incongruence was found between ITS and ETS trees, nor amongst the three plastid trees. Further MP and Bayesian analyses were performed on the separate concatenated nrDNA (77 samples, 1251 aligned characters) and plastid (77 samples, 4465 characters) alignments. Since supported incongruence was detected between the nrDNA and plastid strict consensus trees, species and clades determined to be incongruent were removed prior to performing analyses on the concatenated combined nrDNA and plastid alignment (68 samples, 5599 aligned characters). Trees were viewed in FigTree v1.4.0 (Rambaut 2006+). Clade designations follow Soreng et al. (2010) with modifications as in Cabi et al. (2017) and Soreng et al. (2017b), wherein well-supported major clades are assigned letters.
Results
Plastid and nrDNA Bayesian trees are given in Fig. 1 with summary statistics in Suppl. material 1. There are 100 new sequences reported in GenBank and these are given in Appendix 1. MP trees (bootstrap values shown below branches in Fig. 1) were very similar to the Bayesian trees with a few minor unsupported differences. Major clades (shown by letter and colour in Fig. 1) are identical in both nrDNA and plastid trees, with two exceptions: Poaarctica R. Br. and P.sect.Secundae members (P.curtifolia Scribn., P.secunda J. Presl and P.stenantha Trin.), each belonging to different major clades in the two trees. The position of three major clades differs significantly between the nrDNA and plastid trees: J clade (sect. Jubatae: P.jubata A. Kern.), S clade (sects. Stenopoa and Abbreviatae) and V clade (sect. Pandemos: P.trivialis L.). Poa major clades have been described elsewhere (Gillespie et al. 2007, 2008, 2009, Soreng et al. 2010, 2017b, Cabi et al. 2017); here we focus on the position of Eremopoa.
PoanrDNA and plastid Baysian analyses showing placement of Eremopoa and Lindbergella. Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus trees of nrDNAITS and ETS (left) and plastid data (trnT-trnL-trnF, matK and rpoB-trnC) (right). Bayesian posterior probabilities are shown above branches, MP bootstrap values below branches. Outgroups are not shown. Major clades are indicated by colour and capital letter. Taxa shown in black belong to different major clades in plastid and nrDNA trees.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/242788
Eremopoa species, together with Lindbergellasintenisii and Poaspeluncarum, form a clade (E clade) in both nrDNA and plastid trees, but are strongly supported only in the plastid analysis (pp = 1, BS = 99%). All E.multiradiata, E.oxyglumis, E.persica and E.songarica accessions form a strongly supported clade (core Eremopoa clade) in both trees (pp = 1, BS = 100%). In the plastid analysis E.attalica, L.sintenisii and P.speluncarum form a strongly supported clade (pp = 1, BS = 100%), with L.sintenisii sister to E.attalica (pp = 1, BS = 96%). In the nrDNA tree, E.attalica and P.speluncarum are sister taxa (pp = 0.99, BS = 77%) and Lindbergella is weakly supported as sister to this clade plus the core Eremopoa clade (pp = 0.97, BS = 59%). Within the core Eremopoa clade, all E.oxyglumis and E.songarica samples form a strongly supported clade in the nrDNA analysis (pp = 1, BS = 100%), whereas in the plastid analysis, these samples are divided between two strongly supported clades corresponding to E.oxyglumis plus one E.songarica sample (IRAN 20357, identification needs confirmation) (pp = 1, BS = 89%) and all remaining samples of E.songarica (pp = 1, BS = 100%). Eremopoamultiradiata and E.persica samples do not form a clade in either analysis, although all except one (E.persica, Soreng 9215) are strongly supported as a clade (pp = 1, BS = 95%) in the plastid tree.
The combined nrDNA and plastid Bayesian tree with proportional branch lengths is shown in Fig. 2. Prior to analysis, species and clades with positions incongruent (branch conflicts with ≥ 75% BS) between the nrDNA and plastid trees were removed, including Lindbergellasintenisii, P.arctica, P.sect.Secundae species and the J, S, and V clades. The E clade is strongly supported, as are its two subclades, E.attalica-P.speluncarum and the core Eremopoa clade (all pp = 1, BS = 100%). Both subclades are on long branches and separated by considerable genetic distance. The core Eremopoa clade is subdivided into two strongly supported clades: E.multiradiata-E.persica (pp = 0.99, BS = 96%) and E.oxyglumis-E.songarica (pp = 1, BS = 94%). Eremopoaoxyglumis and three of four accessions of E.songarica each form moderately or strongly supported clades (pp = 1, BS = 86%; pp = 1, BS = 100%, respectively).
Poa combined nrDNA and plastid Baysian analysis showing placement of Eremopoa. Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree of combined nrDNA (ITS and ETS) and plastid data (trnT-trnL-trnF, matK and rpoB-trnC). Bayesian posterior probabilities are shown above branches, MP bootstrap values below branches. Major clades are indicated by colour and capital letter; outgroups are shown in black.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/242789
In the combined nrDNA and plastid tree (Fig. 2), the E clade is strongly supported as sister (pp = 1, BS = 100%) to a clade comprising Poa supersects. Homalopoa (H clade) and Poa (P clade) and the N clade (P.sect.Nanopoa plus unassigned species). In the nrDNA analysis, the E clade is strongly supported as sister to clades P+H (not differentiated), N, and X (represented here by P.arctica) (Fig. 1). In the plastid analysis, the E clade is sister to a larger clade comprising clades H, N, and P, plus J, S and V (Fig. 1).
Discussion
Our molecular analyses of plastid and nuclear ribosomal DNA strongly support the position of Eremopoa and Lindbergella within the genus Poa.Eremopoa and Lindbergella were united in a clade along with Poaspeluncarum with strong support in the plastid and combined trees (weak support in the nuclear tree). We call this set the E clade (Soreng et al. 2010, Cabi et al. 2017) and accept it as Poasubg.Pseudopoa. In its recent usage, this subgenus was initially considered to include only Eremopoa (Zhu et al. 2006, Gillespie et al. 2007); here it is expanded to include Lindbergella and P.speluncarum.
Within the E clade, three taxa of southwest Turkey and Cyprus, E.attalica, P.speluncarum and Lindbergellasintenisii, are phylogenetically isolated from all the other species of Eremopoa sampled (the core Eremopoa clade). All three taxa formed a strongly supported clade in the plastid tree, while in the nuclear tree only the first two species form a clade and L.sintenisii is sister to this clade plus the core Eremopoa clade. The position of L.sintenisii is moderately supported as incongruent between the nuclear and plastid trees suggesting that the genus may be of hybrid origin; however, further studies are needed to confirm incongruence over lack of support.
All Eremopoa taxa sampled, excluding E.attalica, form a strongly supported clade in all trees, called here the core Eremopoa clade. This clade includes two strongly supported subclades in the combined nuclear-plastid tree, corresponding to E.persica s.l. and E.altaica s.l. In the first subclade, E.multiradiata is nested amongst E.persica samples, as is the sample originally determined as E.medica (TARI 35082). The E.multiradiata sample (Soreng 9240) comes from the type locality of E.mardinensis in SW Turkey and is a good match for that species, but we believe that E.mardinensis should be treated as a synonym of E.multiradiata. The E.altaica s.l. subclade in the combined tree includes a strongly supported and divergent clade of three E.songarica samples and a clade of E.oxyglumis plus one sample of E.songarica (identification needs confirmation). The position of E.songarica (tetraploid) with E.oxyglumis (diploid and hexaploid) is strongly supported in the combined and nuclear trees, but is weakly supported with E.persica (diploid) in the plastid tree. This, together with ploidy level, is suggestive of a possible hybrid origin for E.songarica, but this hypothesis needs to be further explored.
As noted in the introduction and Table 1, there has been no consensus on the taxonomy of Eremopoa species. Bor (1970, p. 49) wrote “As far as the genus Eremopoa Roshev. is concerned I am prepared to accept two species only: Eremopoapersica (Trin.) Roshev. and E.bellula (Regel) Roshev.” He considered E.songarica, multiradiata and oxyglumis “only worthy of varietal rank” as the single taxon, E.persicavar.songarica. Tzvelev (1976), Cope (1982) and Mill (1985) dismissed the E.bellula form as indistinct, yet it was maintained as a species by Bor (1970) and Rahmanian et al. (2014). As such, the array of taxa has been treated as a series of species, subspecies or varieties. The taxonomy proposed by Tzvelev (1976) seems the most useful for treating E.persica s.l. and E.altaica s.l.; each is treated as a separate species with subspecies. His classification, supported by molecular data, is adopted here with some minor modifications.
Here, we present a synopsis of P.subg.Pseudopoa based on our current understanding. Further herbarium and molecular study is needed before a more comprehensive revision of the subgenus can be produced. We treat all Eremopoa species, Lindbergellasintenisii and P.speluncarum in P.subg.Pseudopoa. We merge all Eremopoa taxa and L.sintenisii into Poa and treat the Eremopoa taxa as five species. Poadiaphora Trin. is the correct name for E.altaica within Poa. Two subspecies, subsp. diaphora and oxyglumis (Boiss.) Soreng & G.H. Zhu, are recognised in P.diaphora based in part on their mostly clear separation in the plastid analyses and morphological distinctions. Subspecies diaphora includes three difficult to distinguish varieties: var. diaphora (formerly E.altaica), var. alpina and var. songarica (formerly E.songarica). Poapersica includes two subspecies and is clearly separated from both P.diaphora subspecies in the analyses. Most Eremopoa taxa already have names in Poa or the epithets used in Eremopoa are available in Poa (with one exception).
TaxonomyPlantaePoalesPoaceaeAC682844-B845-5F32-923C-C0374EC9C235Poasubg.Pseudopoa(K. Koch) Stapf in J. D. Hooker, Fl. Brit. India 7(22): 337. 1897 [1896].Festuca[unranked] Pseudopoa K. Koch, Linnaea 21(1[4]): 409. 1848. Poasect.Pseudopoa (K. Koch) Hack., Nat. Pflanzenfam. 2(2): 73. 1887. Eremopoa Roshev., Fl. URSS 2: 429, 756. 1934. Type. Poapersica Trin. ≡ Festucapersica (Trin.) K. Koch.LindbergiaBor, Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 62: 467, 1968 (nom. illeg. hom., non Kindb., 1897). Lindbergella Bor, Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 63: 368. 1969. Type. Poasintenisii H. Lindb. ≡ Lindbergellasintenisii (H. Lindb.) Bor.Emended diagnosis.
Like species of other Poa subgenera, but annual (P.speluncarum a weak stooling perennial) and differing from other annual species of Poa by combination of sheath margins fused only near the base (basal sheaths fused to 16%, top sheath 4–12% [to 50% in P.speluncarum]), panicle branches scabrous along angles (P.sintenisii smooth), arranged in whorl-like groups of 5 to 27 per node (sometimes fewer in P.diaphora and P.sintenisii), sometimes the lower whorls of branches naked or with only a few sterile spikelets, flowers bisexual, glumes short (lower glume 2/7–2/3 (–3/4) the first lemma in length), 1-veined (3-veined in P.sintenisii), apex sharply pointed, sometimes apiculate, rachilla internodes exposed, scaberulous, callus glabrous (or with a short crown of hairs in P.sintenisii), lemmas membranous to subchartaceous (P.sintenisii chartaceous), 3–5 veined, the intermediate veins faint when present, laterally compressed, but the keel not pronounced, glabrous or keel and marginal veins short sericeous (also sericeous between the veins in P.sintenisii), but keel scabrous distal to the hairs.
Distribution.
Southwest Asia from Israel, Lebanon, Cyprus and Turkey eastwards through Transcaucasia, Iran, central Asia to western China and northwest India. Sporadic elsewhere, possibly adventive on Egypt’s North African coast but native east of the Red Sea, adventive in Europe and Canada.
Notes.
A subgenus of seven species with several infraspecies, distributed mainly in semi-arid midlands to uplands (usually 300 m plus) to alpine, with winter spring / summer drought precipitation pattern, often along trails and roads, cultivated fields and pastures, around puddles, shallow springs, swales and vernal pools, snow beds, in pine/oak forests to open grasslands and deserts, also in shallow caves, in shallow sandy or stony soils or screes of igneous or metamorphic rocks of igneous or sedimentary origin, including pumice, lava, serpentine, shale, sandstone, limestone and marble.
Key to Poasubgen.Pseudopoa taxa and other annual species of Poa in the coincident geographic region
Plants annual (infrequently perennial or perenniating); anthers mostly 0.2–1 mm (to 1.7 mm in the weak stemmed, stooling perennial P.speluncarum, to 2.8 mm in the annual species Poapersica).
1
Palea keels soft hairy, never scabrous; callus glabrous (Poasect.Micrantherae)
2
–
Palea keels scabrous at least in part (if hairy in part, then distally scabrous); callus glabrous or hairy
3
2
Anthers 0.2–0.5 mm long; panicle branches ascending, spikelets congested along the branches; plants light green
Poainfirma Kunth
–
Anthers 0.5–1 mm long; panicle branches spreading to ascending, spikelets moderately congested along the branches; plants darker green
Poaannua L.
3
Spikelets ovate; lemma keels densely villous medially, many hairs over 0.5 mm long; callus with a plicate web; anthers 0.4–0.8 mm long; panicles short (to 5 cm long), branches terete, smooth or sparsely scabrid, with 1–2 branches per node; upper culm sheath margins fused 25–35(–50)% their length; plants of vernal swales, Albania, Croatia, Greece, Bulgaria and European part of Turkey (Poasect.Jubatae)
Poajubata
–
Spikelets generally lanceolate; lemma keels glabrous or sericeous, hairs less than 0.3(–0.5) mm long; callus glabrous or with a short crown of hairs; anthers 0.2–2.8 mm long; panicles short or long, branches angled, smooth or scabrous, mostly with 2 to 27 branches per node, commonly appearing whorled; upper culm sheath margins fused 4–12% their length (40–50% in P.speluncarum); plants of Cyprus, Anatolian Turkey, southwards and eastwards across Asia into China (Poasubg.Pseudopoa, incl. Eremopoa)
4
4
Uppermost culm sheath margins fused 40–50% their length; spikelets mostly 1-flowered; lemmas glabrous; callus glabrous; anthers 1.1–1.7 long; plants feeble, stooling perennials of caves and shady cool moist places in the Taurus Mts. of Turkey (rare) (Poasect.Speluncarae)
Poaspeluncarum
–
Uppermost culm sheath margins fused 4–12% their length; spikelets (1–)2 to 10-flowered; lemmas glabrous or pubescent; callus glabrous or with a minute crown of hairs; anthers 0.2–2.8 mm long; plants slender tufted annuals
5
5
Lemmas 3-veined, apex slightly apiculate, lemmas and paleas subcoriaceous, sericeous along the keel(s) and marginal veins and between the veins; panicle branches smooth, mostly 1–5 at lower nodes; callus glabrous or with a short crown of hairs; plants endemic to Cyprus (usually on serpentine substrates) (Poasect.Lindbergella)
Poasintenisii
–
Lemmas 5-veined (veins commonly faint), apex infrequently apiculate, lemmas and paleas subchartaceous to subcoriaceous, glabrous between the veins or throughout; panicle branches scabrous, (1–)5–27 at lower nodes; callus glabrous; plants widespread, but not in Cyprus (Poasect.Pseudopoa)
6
6
Panicles with 1 to 3 lower whorls of 7 or more sterile/naked or mostly sterile branches; panicles 7–20 cm long, effusely branched; lemmas 2–2.5 mm long, sericeous along the keel and marginal veins; spikelets 1–4(–6)-flowered
7
–
Panicles not or infrequently with some sterile lower branches; panicles 2–21 cm long, effusely to sparsely branched; lemmas 1.8–4.5 mm long, glabrous or sericeous along the keel and marginal veins; spikelets 1–12-flowered
8
7
Anthers 1.1–1.5 mm long; ligules 1.5–2.5 mm long; branches 7–20 per lower whorl; spikelets 1–4(–6)-flowered; plants of Zagros Mts., Iran
P.nephelochloides
–
Anthers 0.8–1 mm long; ligules 1–1.5 mm long; branches 7–15 per lower whorl; spikelets 1–3-flowered; plants of Taurus Mts., Turkey
P.attalica
8
Anthers (1.2–)1.4–2.8 mm long; lemma apex blunt or obtuse to acutely pointed, with a broad membranous margin (P.persica s.l.)
9
–
Anthers 0.2–1.3 mm long; lemma apex acute or narrowly acute to acuminately pointed, with a narrow membranous margin (blunt or slightly pointed in P.millii but then with 13–27 branches at lower panicle nodes)
10
9
Lemmas all glabrous or rarely with a few hairs near the base of the keel or marginal veins; spikelets (4–)5–10(–12)-flowered; panicles usually ¼–½ the plant height; anthers 1.5–2.8 mm long
P.persicasubsp.multiradiata
–
Lemmas (at least of the lowest flower in a spikelet) minutely sericeous along the keel and marginal veins for ¼–⅔ the length; spikelets (2–)3–7(–9)-flowered; panicles usually ⅖–⅔ the plant height; anthers (1.2–)1.4–1.8 mm long
P.persicasubsp.persica
10
Anthers mostly 0.2–0.6 mm long; lemmas 1.8–4.5 mm long, apex sharply pointed, usually glabrous, infrequently sparsely puberulent along the keel with one or a few soft hairs scattered near the base; spikelets (1–)2–3(–5)-flowered; plants 2–40 cm tall
11
–
Anthers 0.6–1.3 mm long; lemmas 2.3–3 mm long, apex acute and sharply pointed to obtuse and blunt, at least the lowest lemma in a spikelet evenly sericeous (hairs ca. 0.1–0.3(–3.5) mm long, stiff, appressed) along the keel in the proximal ¼–½ and along the marginal veins near the base; spikelets 3–5(–9)-flowered; plants mostly 15–60 cm tall
13
11
Lemmas 3.5–4.5 mm long; panicles (2–)3–8(–9) cm long, branches 1–5(–7) at lower nodes, divaricately rebranched and relatively stout, spikelets usually sparse and few; plants mostly 5–25(–30) cm tall
P.diaphorasubsp.diaphoravar.diaphora
–
Lemmas 1.8–3.5(–3.8 in large specimens with many spikelets) mm long; panicles 2–15(–20) cm long, branches (1–)3–8(–12) at lower nodes, divaricately rebranched or not, capillary to somewhat stout, spikelets sparse to crowded, few to many; plants 2–40 cm tall
12
12
Plants low growing, with dense fascicles of rebranching culms; culms 2–6 cm tall, with lateral inflorescences from lower culm leaves; panicles contracted to open, 1.5–4 cm long, included in tuft of basal leaves or slightly exerted; lemmas 3–3.5 mm long; plants alpine
P.diaphorasubsp.diaphoravar.alpina
–
Plants low growing or taller, without fascicles of rebranching culms; culms solitary to several, mostly 10–40 cm tall, without lateral inflorescences; panicles effuse, usually more than 5 cm long, usually exerted; lemmas 1.8–3.5 mm long; plants of various habitats
P.diaphorasubsp.diaphoravar.songarica
13
Spikelet pedicels mostly 2–5 mm long; panicle branches 5–18 at lower nodes, stiffly spreading, lower whorls never naked or with rudimentary spikelets; lemma apices acutely pointed; anthers 0.6–1.0(1.1) mm long
P.diaphorasubsp.oxyglumis
–
Spikelet pedicels mostly 5–10 mm long: panicle branches (9–)13–27 at lower nodes, slender, slightly flexuous, lower whorls sometimes with a few branches that are naked or with some rudimentary spikelets in addition to normal spikelets; lemma apices obtuse to acute, blunt or slightly pointed; anthers 0.8–1.3 mm long
Tufted annuals. Leaf sheaths keeled, margins fused for 4–12% their length; blades flat to convolute, surfaces scabrous. Panicles open, with (1–)3–27 branches at lower nodes, lower whorls sometimes sterile; branches ascending to widely spreading, scabrous angled, with pedicels mostly equalling or up to 4× longer than their spikelets. Spikelets 1–10-flowered; glumes unequal, 1st glume 1-veined, 2nd glume 3-veined, usually reaching to less than ⅔ the adjacent lemma; rachilla internodes terete, scabrous; callus smooth, glabrous, with a round disarticulation scar; lemmas laterally compressed, weakly keeled, glabrous or short sericeous in lower half of the keel and also along the marginal veins, between veins smooth or scabrous, glabrous (rarely sericeous), 5-veined, intermediate veins obscure to distinct, margins narrowly to broadly scarious, apex obtuse to acuminate, sometimes briefly muticus. Flowers perfect, ovaries glabrous, anthers 0.2–2.8 mm long; caryopsis 1.5–2.5 mm long, narrowly elliptical, laterally compressed, fused to the palea, solid, hilum ⅛–⅙ the grain in length.
Turkey. Antalya, “nordwestl. Antalya bei Termessos, ausgetrockneter Gebirgsbach”, 300 m, 23 Jul 1979, Kehl s.n. (holotype: B! [B-100272775])
Distribution.
Turkey (western Taurus Mts.).
Notes.
We provisionally retain this species in sect. Pseudopoa, despite its divergent phylogenetic placement. The species is morphologically similar to other members of the section. As noted by Mill (1985), it is most like Poanephelochloides Roshev., but the anthers are smaller. Some populations of P.millii approach P.attalica and are problematical to separate (see under P.millii). Further molecular study is needed to determine if the three species are closely related and if a new section is warranted.
“Sterilissimus salsuginosis deserti editi Tschujae”, [1800–3000 m], July 1832, A. Bunge (lectotype, designated by Tzvelev 1976, pg. 480, and marked in herbarium: LE! [Trinius herbarium microform image 424-A4! p.p. Bunge 1832]; isolectotypes: LE [3 specimens: TRIN-2620.01! with original description (Trinius herbarium microform 312-A1), Trinius herbarium microform images 424-A3!, 424-A5!], K [K000789849 image!; specimen labelled “Airaaltaica Trin. Altai”, “Acad. St. Petrop, mis. 8br 1835” is a good match for LE type material]). See Soreng et al. (1995) for explanation of Trinius herbarium citations.
Distribution.
Egypt (Sinai Peninsula) to China (Xinjiang, Xizang).
Notes.
Separating the four forms of Poadiaphora s.l. treated here is often difficult. Here we choose to recognise two subspecies as divided in the molecular plastid analysis. Subspecies diaphora and oxyglumis are most easily separated by the minute anthers (0.2–0.6 mm) combined with glabrous or nearly glabrous lemmas in the former and slightly longer anthers (0.6–1.1 mm) combined with hairy lemma keels and marginal veins in the latter. The other forms, diaphora s.s., songarica and alpina are essentially intergrading and are here treated as varieties in subsp. diaphora.
The specimen K000789848 (image!) (“Al. Bunge” ex hrbr. Alexandri Lehmann, Reliquiae botanicae, original det “Poadiaphora Tr.”) might be original material of Airaaltaica, but RJS doubts it as it is not a good match for LE types; it is a taller plant more like K00789847 (also Reliquiae Lehmannianae), which is Bunge material collected 20 May 1842, in Karakum desert.
China (Xinjiang, Xizang), Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Pakistan, Russia (Altai Mts.), Tajikistan, Turkey.
Notes.
A single specimen recorded from Turkey (Kars Prov., Litvinov 4790 US ex K) evidently belongs to this variety and was also cited by Mill (1985) under E.songarica.
PoasubgenusPseudopoasect.Pseudopoa. AP.diaphorasubsp.diaphoravar.diaphora, Chu, Kyrgyz Republic (Soreng et al. 7537) B, CP.persicasubsp.persica, Adiyaman, Turkey (Soreng et al. 9215) B habit C closeup of base of plant showing keeled leaf sheaths and caniculate blades D, EP.persicasubsp.multiradiata, Mardin, Turkey (Soreng et al. 9240) D habit E spikelet showing glabrous lemmas. Photos by R.J. Soreng.
Turkey. Plantae Lyciae, ad fonts reginis alpinae montis Elmalu, 25 Jun 1860, E. Bourgeau 271 (lectotype, here designated: G [G00330280 image!]; isolectotypes: G [G00380172 image!, p.p. central and right top two samples], G [G0038173 image!], K [K-000789856 image!]).
This taxon, accepted as Eremopoabellula by several authors (see Names of Uncertain Application below), was first recognised infraspecifically by Boissier (1884) as Poapersicavar.alpina. The variety is common in the highest elevations at which the genus occurs, in the alpine of Turkey, Iran and Afghanistan to the Pamir mountains, reaching 4000 m. Further study is needed to clarify the distinction of var. alpina from var. diaphora and these from Eremopoabellula, as the material placed here appears heterogenous.
Of the six syntypes of var. alpina cited by Boissier (Bourgeau 271, hab. in alpinis, montes supra Elmali Lyciae [G00380172, G0038173, G00330280, K000789856]; Kotschy 12, Tarus Cilicicus, 5–6000’; Prairies humides de la region alpine du Taurus, au Boulgarmden [as 12d: G00330281, K000789851 image!]; Balansa s.n., Jul-Aug 1855 [K000789857, P02358251 p.p. bottom right]; Blanche s.n., Libani cacuminal; Kotschy 477, mons Kuh Delu Persiae australis, 10 Jun 1842 [BM000959359 image!, E!, G00308632 image!, P02358251! p.p. “fo. pygmaea” bottom left]), we select Bourgeau 271 as the lectotype as it is typical of the form. As noted by Samuelsson (1950), the Sintenis syntype (mons Troodos, Cypri) represents a separate form that is treated here as Poasintenisii. Poapersica var. “minor” Boiss. (cited by Mill, in Fl. Turkey 9: 492. 1985) is a nomen nudum since it is a herbarium name on Bourgeau 271, syntype of var. alpina Boiss.; this name is also inscribed on Kotschy 12d (p.p. G00308174), but the latter is original material, not a syntype, mentioned by Boissier (1884).
PlantaePoalesPoaceae929667C3-CF9B-50CC-9B96-12DF01F146D9Poadiaphorasubsp.diaphoravar.songaricaurn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77191834-1(Schrenk ex Fisch. & C.A. Mey.) Soreng, Cabi & L.J. Gillespiecomb. nov.GlyceriasongaricaSchrenk ex Fisch. & C.A. Mey., Enum. Pl. Nov. 1: 1–2. 1841. Nephelochloasongarica (Schrenk ex Fisch. & C.A. Mey.) Griseb., Fl. Ross. 4(13): 367. 1852. Nephelochloapersicavar.songarica (Schrenk ex Fisch. & C.A. Mey.) Regel, Trudy Imp. S.-Peterburgsk. Bot. Sada 7: 603. 1881. Poasongarica (Schrenk ex Fisch. & C.A. Mey.) Boiss., Fl. Orient. 5: 611. 1884. Poapersicavar.songarica(Schrenk ex Fisch. & C.A. Mey.) Stapf, Fl. Brit. India 7(22): 337. 1897 [1896]. Eremopoasongarica (Schrenk ex Fisch. & C.A. Mey.) Roshev., Fl. URSS 2: 431, pl. 32, f. 11. 1934. Eremopoapersicavar.songarica (Schrenk ex Fisch. & C.A. Mey.) Bor, Grass. Burma, Ceylon, India & Pakistan 532. 1960. Eremopoaaltaicasubsp.songarica (Schrenk ex Fisch. & C.A. Mey.) Tzvelev, Bot. Zhurn. (Moscow & Leningrad) 51(8): 1104. 1966. Poadiaphorasubsp.songarica (Schrenk ex Fisch. & C.A. Mey.) Soreng & G.H. Zhu, Fl. China vol. 22: 266. 2006. Poasongaricavar.argaea Hausskn. & Bornm. ex R.R. Mill, Fl. Turkey & E. Aegean Isl. 9: 491. 1985, nom. inval., as syn. of Eremopoasongarica.Poaparadoxa
Kar. & Kir., Bull. Soc. Imp. Naturalistes Moscou 864. 1841, nom. illeg. hom. Poasubtilis Kar. & Kir., Bull. Soc. Imp. Naturalistes Moscou 15(3): 532. 1842. nom. nov. (cited Poaparadaxa Kar. & Kir., 1941 [entry no.] 926). Type protologue. Hab. in herbosis ad rivulum Ai deserti Soongoro-Kirghisici, Jun, Karelin & Kiriloff. Type: Hab. in herbosis ad rivulum Ai deserti Soongoro-Kirghisici, Jun 1840, Karelin & Kiriloff (Herb. Fischer no. 504) (lectotype, here designated: LE!; isotypes: P [P02663383!], W [W0028251 image!]).Type.
Ad fl. Karatal versus montes Karatau, 13 June 1840, H. Schrenk s.n. (holotype: LE; isotype: LE).
Distribution.
Afghanistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, China (Xizang), Georgia, Iran, Israel, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Turkey, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan.
Notes.
Poadiaphoravar.songarica was recently recorded (as Eremopoasongarica; determination verified here) from one locality in northernmost Israel (Danin and Fragman-Sapir 2016+). It was collected as a waif in Canada (Manitoba) in the 1950s (Stevenson 1965, as E.persica; Darbyshire 2007, as E.altaica: re-identified here), but is apparently not persistent (Darbyshire 2007, B.A. Ford, pers. comm, 2018).
Tzvelev (1976, pg. 480) cited “In herbidis Songaria ad rivulum Tschulak [Jun 1841], Karelin & Kiriloff 2123” (LE!) as type of P.subtilis (duplicates at BM000959360 image!, K000789846 image!, BR0000006600860 image!, P02663388!, P02663405!), but the type is the one [1840] collection cited by Karelin and Kiriloff (1841) distributed as Herb. Fischer no. 504.
Turkey. In collibus prope Baibout, 17 Jul 1963, E. Bourgeau (lectotype, designated by Tzvelev 1976, pg. 479: LE! [LE00009676]; isolectotypes: LE [LE00009678 image!], P [P02358146! pp a, P03142400!]).
Distribution.
Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, China (Xizang), Kyrgyz Republic, Pakistan, Tajikistan, Turkey, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan.
Notes.
Most accounts have recognised this taxon at one rank or another, except Mill (1985) who treated it as a synonym of E.songarica. Several collections were cited in the original protologue: Tchihatcheff, Hab. in Ponto; Balansa, Ponto Lazico ad Djimil [Balansa 1549 G00308631, E, LE!, P02014318 (= subsp. oxyglumis), P02014317 (= P.persicasubsp.multiradiata), US!]; Huet, Erzurum [G00330279, G00308633]; E. Bourgeau, Armenia, in collibus et agris in cultis Armeniae Turcicae ad Gumuchkhane.
PlantaePoalesPoaceae63F0E225-F4DA-5AF4-A448-97CF0C5C208EPoamilliiurn:lsid:ipni.org:names:60477374-2Soreng, Cabi & L.J. Gillespienom. nov.EremopoacapillarisR.R. Mill, Fl. Turkey & E. Aegean Isl. 9: 624, 490. 1985 (non Poacapillaris L. 1753). Eremopoapersicavar.ramosissima Azn. ex R.R. Mill, Fl. Turkey & E. Aegean Isl. 9: 490. 1985, nom. inval.Type.
Turkey. Adana, distr. Feke, Sencan Dere nr Gurumze, 1300 m, 30 May 1952, P.H. Davis, Dodds & Cetic 19681 (holotype: E! [E00196495]; isotypes: BM! [BM000959355], K! [K000789852]).
Distribution.
Turkey (central and eastern Taurus Mts. and adjacent ranges).
Notes.
Morphologically Poamillii is intermediate between P.persicasubsp.persica and P.attalica. However, we are not sure which of these it is actually related to or if it is a hybrid between them. The type approaches P.persica in having anthers 1.2–1.3 mm long and P.attalica in having abundant branching and sometimes having some sterile branches amongst the lower branch whorls. Much of the material of P.millii from further west than the type location from the Taurus Mts. has smaller anthers and is problematical to separate from P.attalica.
PlantaePoalesPoaceae7A4367B6-FB08-5B08-9A78-5F14216852EAPoanephelochloidesurn:lsid:ipni.org:names:60477375-2(Roshev.) Soreng, Cabi & L.J. Gillespiecomb. nov.EremopoanephelochloidesRoshev., in Köie, M., Beitr. Fl. Sudwest Iran I. Danish Sci. Invest. Iran In K. Jessen & R. Sparck. (Eds) Danish Sci. Invest. Iran, pt. 4: 50. 1945. Eremopoapersicavar.nephelochloides Roshev., nom. inval. as syn. of E.nephelochloides.Type.
Iran. 60 km north of Dizful, 3 May 1937, M. Köie 475 (lectotype, here designated: C [C10016935 image!]; isolectotype: LE).
Distribution.
Iran (Zagros Mts.).
Notes.
Due to its sterile whorls of branches, this species seems very close to Poamillii and P.attalica, but may be a derivative of P.persica since it has longer anthers than the previous taxa. Roshevits cited two gatherings of Köie: “Kechwar, 700 m (3 May 1937; no. 475). Chah-Bazan, 500 m” (Kechvar is about 60 km north of Dizful). The specimen at C has the same date and collection number as Roshevits cited and was annotated by Roshevits as this taxon; we select it as the lectotype. The anthers are ca. 1.1–1.2 mm as measured from the C photo and other characters seem to match P.attalica. The anther length is given as 1.5 mm in Roshevits’ diagnosis. The specimen clearly has the hyaline lemma apices of P.persica s.l. (in contrast to P.diaphora). However, these features are also present in the type of E.capillaris (=P.millii). Poaattalica has shorter anthers, ca. 0.8 to 1 mm, on the type (anthers not described by Scholz 1980 or Mill 1985). Poanephelochloides and P.attalica may represent the same species, diagnosed as different from P.persica by sterile branches and from Nephelochloaorientalis Boiss. by glabrous lemmas (P.nephelochloides has pubescent lemmas). However, Poanephelochloides and P.attalica are geographically isolated by over 1500 km and have different anther lengths.
PlantaePoalesPoaceae77C06DE7-61A9-5DA2-AE61-F7DD26D5E77FPoapersicaTrin., Mém. Acad. Imp. Sci. St.-Pétersbourg, Sér. 6, Sci. Math. 1(4): 373. 1830.Festucapersica(Trin.) K. Koch, Linnaea 21(1[4]): 410. 1848. Nephelochloapersica (Trin.) Griseb., Fl. Ross. 4(13): 366. 1852. Poapamphylica Boiss., Diagn. Pl. Orient., ser. 1, 13: 58. 1854[1853?], nom. inval. as syn. of Poapersica. Eremopoapersica (Trin.) Roshev., Fl. URSS 2: 430, pl. 32, f. 8. 1934.Type.
Iran: in collibus ad Akar-Tschai prob. Karabagh, 1400–1900 m, 27 May 1829, Szowits 246 (lectotype, designated by Tzvelev 1976, pg. 479: LE! [photo E000327964!, TRIN-microform 434-B4!]; isolectotypes: LE [TRIN-2666.02!, TRIN-microform 434A8!, 434-B1!, 434-B2!, 434-B3!]).
Notes.
Other original material includes: Iran, Prov. Aderbeidschan. distr. Khoi, ad Seidchadzi, 18 May 1828, Szovits 258 (LE!, LE0009678 [image!], LE0009679, LE0009680 [image!], LE0009681 [image!], W0028250 [image!]; In apricis prov. Aderbeidschan e Karabahg, Fischer [herb. Fischer] (K000789867 [image!]). Poapersica has two major variations: subsp. persica with pubescent lemmas and relatively narrower panicle length to plant height ratio; and subsp. multiflora with glabrous lemmas and relatively greater panicle length to plant height ratio, and often more flowers per spikelet.
PlantaePoalesPoaceae5B0A97EB-57FE-5AC7-B669-27665AFC7D9FPoapersicasubsp.persicaFig. 3B, CEremopoapersicavar.typicaGrossh., Trudy. Bot. Inst. Azerbaidzh. Fil. Akad. Nauk. S.S.S.R. 8: 268. 1939, nom. inval. Eremopoapersicavar.persica. 1960.PoacilicensisHance, Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot., sér. 4, 18: 234. 1862. Type protologue. In Tauro cilicio, Kotschy 529. Type. In monte Tauro, aestate 1836, Kotschy 529, this from hb. H.F. Hance [via Reed 1887] no. 7498 (lectotype, here designated: BM! [BM000551484, right hand plant (2 left hand specimens are Poadiaphora var. songarica and are clearly excluded from Hance’s description written on the sheet)]; isolectotype: P! [P02642319]).GlyceriatauricaSteud., Syn. Pl. Glumac. 1: 286. 1854 (non Poataurica E. Pojarkova, 1965, Poa×taurica H.N. Pojark., 1963). Type protologue. In monte Tauro, 1836, Kotschy (Kotschy hrbr.). Type. In monte Tauro, Aestate,1836, Kotschy 529 (lectotype, here designated: P! [P02642319]; isolectotype: BM [BM000551484 image!]).Distribution.
Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Egypt (north coast, possibly adventive), Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Pakistan, Syria, Turkey; waif in France (introduced in wool, Marseille, H. Roux, P06768417!, P03370109!; RJS determination, 2015) and Norway (Greuter et al. 1984+).
Notes.
Although Kotschy’s herbarium is mainly at W, a search of the W herbarium website did not turn up Kotschy 529 except as the genus Arenaria from Tauro cilicio or a Scrophularia from Persia. Kotschy 528 at W is a Poa of the P.bulbosa complex from “In monte Tauro” in 1836. Presumably the earlier 1836 set was broken up and 529 ended up at BM and P. The anthers in the G.taurica lectotype are 1.8 mm long and the lemmas are pubescent along the keel and marginal veins.
PlantaePoalesPoaceaeFECD7B79-D2D6-54D8-AC53-F8ADAB6DE623Poapersicasubsp.multiradiataurn:lsid:ipni.org:names:60477377-2(Trautv.) Soreng, Cabi & L.J. Gillespiecomb. nov.Fig. 3D, EPoapalustrisvar.multiradiataTrautv., Trudy Imp. S.-Peterburgsk. Bot. Sada 4: 406. 1876. Poamultiradiata (Trautv.) Regel, Trudy Imp. S.-Peterburgsk. Bot. Sada 7: 620. 1880. Eremopoamultiradiata (Trautv.) Roshev., Fl. URSS 2: 430, t. 32. 1934. Eremopoapersicasubsp.multiradiata (Trautv.) Tzvelev, Zlaki SSSR 479. 1976.NephelochloatripolitanaBoiss. & Blanche, Diagn. Pl. Orient., ser. 2, 4: 133–134. 1859. Poapersicavar.major Boiss., Fl. Orient. 5: 610–611. 1884. Type protologue. Hab. ad margines semitarum inter hortos ad Tripolium Syriae (Blanche), circa Byrouth in Libano (Gaillardot). Type. Lebanon. S. Tripoli, dans les bords des chemins, 16 May 1854, Blanche 1267 (lectotype, here designated: JE [JE00005064 ex herb. Gaillardot, image!]). Note. Two of the original specimens turned up in our search, Blanche 1267 (JE00005064 ex herb. Gaillardot) and Gaillardot s.n. (JE00005065 ex herb Gaillardot no. 2323 [image!]). Blanche in 1869 (P02530724) might also be original material, with a distribution date rather than a collection date.EragrostisbarbeyiPost, Bull. Herb. Boissier 5: 760–761. 1897. Type protologue. Habitat in collibus prope Midyat (Mardin), no. 38. Type. Turkey. Midyat, Hillsides, May 1895, 38 Barbey (lectotype, here designatedby Nada Sinno Saoud & RJS: BEI! (image seen by RJS!)). Note. The BEI sheet has “No. 55 38 Barbey, 1895” (55 was originally written as 54 but the 4 written over by 5).EremopoamardinensisR.R. Mill, Fl. Turkey & E. Aegean Isl. 9: 624, 488. 1985.Type. Turkey. Mardin, Mardin to Nusaybin, 8 km from Mardin, 850 m alt., shallow limestone gully, 22 May 1957, P. H. Davis & D. Hedge 28491 (holotype: E! [E00196494]).Type.
Armenia rossica, prope monasterium Kiptschach, 1875, G. Raddi. Type: Armenia rossica: prope monasterium Kiptschach in monte Alagos, Jun 1875, G. Radde 124 (holotype: LE! [photo E00326521!]; isotypes: LE, LE, W [W19160014191 image!]).
Distribution.
Armenia, Georgia, Iran, Lebanon, Pakistan, Syria and Turkey.
Notes.
The presence of hairs on the lemmas in material treated as “multiradiat” is confused in the literature. Mill (1985) indicates that E.multiradiata and E.persica s.s. have lemma keels hairy in the lower ⅓–½. We concur with Tzvelev (1976), who keyed E.persicasubsp.persica as lemmas short pilose along the base of keel and marginal veins and subsp. multiradiata as lemmas glabrous or with a few solitary hairs.
Mill (1985) distinguished his new species Eremopoamardinensis from E.multiradiata based on its glabrous lemmas, 8–12-flowered spikelets and florets strongly divergent from the rachilla. However, subsp. multiradiata also has glabrous lemmas (as noted above) and divergent florets (when spikelets are in flower) and its (4)5–9(10)-flowered spikelets overlap in number; therefore, we treat E.mardinensis as a synonym of E.multiradiata. The type material of Eragrostisbarbeyi is from the same place as E.mardinensis and is clearly the same form (spikelets many-flowered); Nephelochloatripolitana, with ca. 12–14-flowered spikelets, also appears to belong to this form. If E.mardinensis were accepted as a species, the basionym names Eragrostisbarbeyi or Nephelochloatripolitana would have priority.
Differing from Poasect.Pseudopoa in being perennial and stooling, with top culm sheath margins fused 40–50% their length and from almost all Poa in proximal spikelets being 1-flowered.
Turkey. C4, Konya, distr. Ermenek, Kamis Dere between Ermenek and Oyuklu Dag., floor of caverns, 1400–1500 m, 14 Aug 1949, P. H. Davis 16180 (holotype: K! [K000641325]; isotype: E! [E00367874]).
Distribution.
Turkey (central Taurus Mts.).
Notes.
Poaspeluncarum was described by Edmondson (1985) as an annual species of Poasect.Ochlopoa Asch. & Graebn (≡ Poasect.Micrantherae Stapf. Type: Poaannua). Our investigation found it to be a feeble, stooling perennial with sparsely scabrous panicle branches, uppermost sheaths closed up to half their length, spikelets sparsely scaberulous, mostly 1-flowered, the distal-most ones frequently 2(–3) flowered, anthers 1.1–1.7 mm, caryopsis 1.7–1.8 mm long, hilum 0.3 mm long and grain adherent to the palea. DNA data have clearly placed it in the Poa clade that includes Eremopoa species (E clade), either as sister to P.attalica (nuclear data) or as sister to P.attalica + P.sintenisii (plastid data). The species is odd in subgenus Pseudopoa for its perennial habit (albeit weak) and more closed sheaths, and in Poa generally by its mostly uniflorous spikelets. It is a very rare species that lives in the backs of shallow, moist, cool caves in the Taurus Mts., along with other cave endemics.
PlantaePoalesPoaceaeDFD6425A-C4C5-52B5-9BBD-7CD2AA1857D7Poasubg.Pseudopoasect.Lindbergellaurn:lsid:ipni.org:names:60477379-2 (Bor) Soreng, Cabi & L.J. Gillespiesect. nov.LindbergiaBor, Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 62: 467, 1968 (nom. illeg. hom., non Kindb., 1897).LindbergellaBor, Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 63: 368. 1969.Type.
Poasintenisii H. Lindb. ≡ Lindbergellasintenisii (H. Lindb.) Bor.
Diagnosis.
Differing from Poasect.Pseudopoa in: panicle branches smooth; lower glume 3-veined, up to 3/4 as long as the lower lemma; lemmas 3-veined, relatively firm, sericeous on keel marginal veins and sides; callus with short crown of hairs, the hairs 0.2 mm long; and palea keels sericeous in part.
PlantaePoalesPoaceae60675F9E-7914-589B-B6AD-48D9F7AECDCDPoasintenisiiH. Lindb., Årsbok-Vuosik. Soc. Sci. Fenn. 20 B (7): 5. 1942 (emend. Lindberg 1946).Lindbergiasintenisii(H. Lindb.) Bor, Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 62: 467. 1968. Lindbergellasintenisii (H. Lindb.) Bor, Fl. Cyprus 63: 368. 1969.Poapersicasubsp.cypriaSam., Ark. Bot., n.s. 1(9): 417. 1950 [1951].Type. Cyprus. auf dem Troodos, 20 Jun 1880, P. Sintenis 881 (lectotype, here designated: S; isolectotypes: B [B 10 0365891!], LD [LD1808162 image!, LD1808226 image!], G?, K [K000789835 image!, K000789836 image!, K000789837 image!], W [W0012225 image!, W0033518 image!, W00096518 image!, W0019026 image!]).Type protologue.
Cyprus. In pineto (P.pallasiana) in m. Troodos lecta est. 1939. Type. Cyprus. Troodos in pineto juxta via huad procul ab “Olympus Camp Hotel”, 22 Jun 1939, H. Lindberg s.n. (holotype: S [S-11-34137 image!]; isotypes: S [S-G-4941 image!], K [K000789839 image!], LD [LD1807330 image!], W [image!]).
Distribution.
Cyprus (Mt. Troodos, endemic to serpentine rocks).
Names of uncertain application within Poa subgen. PseudopoaPlantaePoalesPoaceae01C52470-DA56-571C-8037-1D23397E9594FestucabellulaRegel, Trudy Imp. S.-Peterburgsk. Bot. Sada 7: 594. 1881. Eremopoa bellula (Regel) Roshev., Fl. URSS 2: 431, pl. 32, f. 12. 1934.Type protologue.
Ad fontes calidos Araschan Bulak in Turkestania occidentali, Krause s.n. Type: Taschkenter Alatau, Araschan Bulak, 11 Jun 1871, (Hieronymous) Krause s.n. (holotype: LE [only one collection cited]).
Notes.
Eremopoabellula was applied by several authors to small densely tufted alpine annual plants of south-central and southwest Asia, which we recognise as P.diaphoravar.alpina (based on Poapersicavar.alpinaBoissier [1884]). Tzvelev (1976, pg. 480) noted that the holotype collection of E.bellula appeared to be a mix of altaica (diaphora) and songarica forms (“p.p. max” = E.altaicasubsp.songarica , somewhat intermediate between this subsp. and subsp. altaica, and “p.p. minor” = E.altaicasubsp.altaica); he considered E.bellula to be a synonym of E.altaica subsp. songarica. Further study is needed to clarifiy the placement of Eremopoabellula and determine if it is synonymous with P.diaphoravar.alpina.
PlantaePoalesPoaceae8B1DCCF5-3967-538F-BE34-73A323EB7D5EEremopoaglareosaGamajun., Bot. Mater. Gerb. Inst. Bot. Akad. Nauk Kazahsk. SSR 2: 2. 1964.Type protologue.
Usbekistanica, Tian Schan Occid., Bostandyk, fonts Aksar-sai, 28 Jul 1949, N. V. Pavlov s.n. (holotype: AA).
Notes.
Tzvelev (1976, pg. 480) included E.glareosa as a synonym under E.altaicasubsp.songarica, but noted that it is somewhat intermediate between this taxon and E.altaicasubsp.altaica. As the protologue indicates the plants are 10–28 cm tall, with 3 to 4 florests per spikelet, spikelets 4–7 mm long and anthers 2.5 mm long, this is more likely to be Poapersica, perhaps subsp. multiradiata, since no pubescence is indicated.
PlantaePoalesPoaceae41602A64-892E-5CB3-898D-AAB9BCBD83F1FestucaheptanthaK. Koch, Linnaea 21(3): 410. 1848. Poa heptantha (K. Koch) Steud., Syn. Pl. Glumac. 1: 255. 1854.Type protologue.
Im Hochgebirge, auf sumpfigen Wiesen, auf Urgestein, 5500 ft, C. Koch s.n. (holotype: B, probably destroyed).
Note.
There is no location in the species protologue beyond the article title “Beitrage zu einer Flora des Orients”. Tzvelev (1976) indicated this name and the next, Festucapolygama, probably apply to Eremopoapersica and that the types of these were in Berlin (B). Clayton et al. 2002+ (GrassBase) reflect the same information. RJS was unable to locate type material of either of these two names at B, P or via internet searches.
PlantaePoalesPoaceae08ADA458-806B-519F-BBC7-875C945387AEFestucapolygamaK. Koch, Linnaea 21: 409. 1848. Poa polygama (K. Koch) Steud., Syn. Pl. Glumac. 1: 255. 1854.Type protologue.
“Aus dem Wilhelm’schen Herbr als Poapersica.” Type: Wilhelms (holotype: B, probably destroyed).
Notes.
Tzvelev (1976) indicates “Caucasus?”, but there is no location in the species protologue beyond the article title “Beitrage zu einer Flora des Orients”.
Persia, Prov. Azerbaijan occid.: In pratis paludosis SE Shahpur versus lacum Rezaiyeh (Urmia), 1300 m; 12 Jun 1971, Rechinger 41820 (holotype: W [W1972-0000975 image!; isotypes: B! [B 10_0272774], GZU [GZU000201751 image!], WU [WU0033125 image!]).
Notes.
The type collection of Eremopoamedica is clearly a perennial species of Puccinellia (possibly P.gigantea (Grossh.) Grossh.) with lemmas rounded on the back, a distinct short crown of callus hairs and papillae common on vegetative structures (pedicels and leaves). Material cited as E.medica in Rahmanian et al. (2014, fig. 5) appears to us to be Poapersicasubsp.persica; their description and illustration indicate an annual habit, pubescent lemmas and panicles with 10 or more branches per whorl. The single specimen (TARI 35082) cited was included in our molecular analysis and formed a clade with other P.persica accessions in all trees.
Invalid names, not vouchered
Festucaamherstiana Nees, Ill. Bot. Himal. Mts. 417. 1839, nom. nud., name in list, no voucher.
Notes. Kew GrassBase (Clayton et al. 2002+) indicates it is equal to E.persica. The specimen K00078950 (ex P) (image!), Voyage V. Jacquemont aux Indes orient. no. 1902, has this name on the label. The specimen is certainly P.diaphora, not P.persica.
Acknowledgements
We thank the curators and staff at the following herbaria for loans and/or specimen images: E, G, BEI, BM, B, K, LE, P, US, ANK, ISTE, NKU and W. Ralf Hand kindly sent us leaf material and a duplicate of Lindbergellasintenisii from Cyprus; Mostafa Assadi and Mohammad Amini-Rad kindly sent leaf material from Iran from the TARI and IRAN herbaria. Nada Sinno Saoud kindly provided an image of Eragrostisbarbeyi from the Post herbarium (BEI). We thank Roger Bull for assistance with the molecular research and Paul Peterson, Stephen Wagstaff and Clifford Morden for their helpful reviews. Part of the molecular study was performed by NA as part of her Masters thesis at the University of Ottawa and Canadian Museum of Nature. LJG acknowledges the support of the Canadian Museum of Nature and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).
ReferencesAkaikeH (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification.19(6): 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705AschersonPFAGraebnerORPP (1900) Synopsis der Mitteleuropaïschen Flora, Vol. 2, part 1. W. Engelmann, Leipzig.BoissierPE (1884) Ordo CXLI. Gramineae. In: BoissierPE (Ed.) Flora Orientalis, vol., 432–692.BoissierPE (1859) Gramineae. In: BoissierPE (Ed.) Diagnoses Plantarum Orientalium Novarum, ser 2., 125–146.BorNL (1960) Pergamon Press, Oxford, 767 pp.BorNL (1968a) Gramineae. In: TownsendCCGuestERAl-RawiA (Eds) Flora of Iraq, vol., 1–588.BorNL (1968b) Lindbergia Bor: A new genus of grasses from Cyprus. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 62: 467–470.BorNL (1969) A correction.63: 368–369.BorNL (1970) Gramineae. In: RechingerKH (Ed.) Flora Iranica, vol., 1–573.CabiEDoğanM (2012) Poaceae. In: GünerAAslanSEkimTVuralMBabaçMT (Eds) Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi., 690–756.CabiESorengRJGillespieLJ (2017) Taxonomy of Poajubata and a new section of the genus (Poaceae).41: 404–415. https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-1611-28ClaytonWDRenvoizeSA (1986) Genera Graminum.13: 1–389.Clayton WD, Vorontsova MS, Harman KT, Williamson H (2002+) GrassBase – The Online World Grass Flora, World Grass Species: Synonymy. https://www.kew.org/data/grassbase/index.html [Accessed 10 March 2018]CopeTA (1982) Poaceae, In: NasirEAliSI (Eds) Flora of Pakistan, Vol., 1–678.CzerepanovSK (1981) Sosudistye rasteniya SSSR [Vascular Plants of the USSR]. Nauka, Leningradskoe Otd-nie, Leningrad, 1–509.CzerepanovSK (1995) Vascular plants of Russia and Adjacent States (the former USSR). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1–532.Danin A, Fragman-Sapir O (2016+) Flora of Israel Online. http://flora.org.il/en/plants/ [accessed October 2018]DarbyshireSJ (2007) Eremopoa Roshev. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee (Eds) Flora of North America North of Mexico, Vol. 24. Oxford University Press, New York, 618–619.DarribaDTaboadaGLDoalloRPosadaD (2012) jModelTest2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing.9(8): 772. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2109EdmondsonJR (1985) Poa. In: Davis PH (Ed.) Flora of Turkey and East Aegean Islands, Vol. 9. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 470–486.FischerFELMeyerCA (1841) Enumerato Plantarum Novarum, Vol. 1. G. Fisheri, Petropoli, 1–77.GabrieljanETOganesianME (2010) Poaceae. In: TakhtajanAL (Ed.) Flora Armenii 11., 1–547.GillespieLJArchambaultASorengRJ (2007) Phylogeny of Poa (Poaceae) based on trnT-trnF sequence data: Major clades and basal relationships.23(1): 420–434. https://doi.org/10.5642/aliso.20072301.33GillespieLJSorengRJBullRDJacobsSWLRefulio RodríguezN (2008) Phylogenetic relationships in subtribe Poinae (Poaceae, Poeae) based on nuclear ITS and plastid trnT-trnL-trnF sequences.86(8): 938–967. https://doi.org/10.1139/B08-076GillespieLJSorengRJJacobsSWL (2009) Phylogenetic relationships of Australian Poa (Poaceae: Poinae), including molecular evidence for two new genera, Saxipoa and Sylvipoa. Australian Systematic Botany 22(6): 413–436. https://doi.org/10.1071/SB09016GillespieLJSorengRJParadisMBullRD (2010) Phylogeny and reticulation in subtribe Poinae and related subtribes (Poaceae) based on nrITS, ETS, and trnTLF data. In: SebergOPetersenGBarfodASDavisJI (Eds) Diversity, Phylogeny, and Evolution in the Monocotyledons., 589–617.Greuter W, Heywood V, Jury S, Marhold K, Pertti U, Valdés B (Eds) (1984+) Euro+Med PlantBase. http://www.emplantbase.org/home.html [accessed 10 May 2018]GrisebachAHR (1852) Ordo CXLII Gramineae, In: LedebourCF von (Ed.) Flora Rossica, Vol., 324–484.GrossheimAA (1939) Flora Kavkaza (ed. 2), Vol. 1. Akademiia Nauk S.S.S.R. Azerbaidzhanskii filial, Baku, Azerbaijan, 1–402.HackelE (1887) Gramineae. In: EnglerHGAPrantlK (Eds) Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, Vol., 1–97.HoffmannMHSchneiderJHasePRöserM (2013) Rapid and Recent World-Wide Diversification of Bluegrasses (Poa, Poaceae) and Related Genera.8(3): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060061KarelinGSKiriloffIP (1841) Enumeratio plantarum in desertis Songariae orientalis. Moscow, 233 pp.KatohKStandleyDM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability.30(4): 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010KochK (1848) Beitrage zu einer Flora des Orients. Linnaea 21(1[4]): 289–743.KöieME (1945) Beitrag zur Flora Sudwest-Irans I.4: 9–56.KovalevskajaSS (1968) Poa. Opredelitel’. Rastenii Srednei Azii 1: 127–138.LindbergH (1942) En botanisk resa till Cypern 1939: foredrag vid tilltradendet av ordforande-skapet i Finska Vetensaps-Societeten den 29 April 1941. Årsbok-Vousikirja Societas Scientiarum Fennica 20 B(7): 1–12.LindbergH (1946) Iter cyprium contributio ad cognitionem florae insulae Cypri. Acta Societatis Scientiarum Fennicae, Series B.7: 3–37.MillRR (1985) Eremopoa, Nephelochloa, Catabrosella, Colpodium, Hyalopoa, Catabrosa, Paracolpodium. In: Davis PH (Ed.) Flora of Turkey and East Aegean Islands, Vol. 9. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 486–501.NikiforovaODOvchinnikovaSVLipinASBlasovaNOlonovaMV (2012) Poaceae. In: Baikov KS (Ed.) Conspectus Florae Rossiae Asiaticae: Plantae Vasculares, Academia Scintiarum Rossica, Divisio Sibirca, Novosibirsk, 518–576.PavlovNVGamajunovaAP (1964) Addenda ad “Flora Kasachstanica” I-IV.2: 10–13.PostGEAutranEJB (1897) PlantaePostianae, quas enumerant G. -E. Post and E. Autran, Novas species descripsit G. -E. Post, Fasciulus VIII.5: 754–761.RahmanianSSaeidiHAssadiMRahiminejadMR (2014) A taxonomic revision of the genus Eremopoa Roschv. (Poaceae, Poeae) in Iran.20(1): 8–15.Rambaut A (2006+) FigTree, Tree Figure Drawing Tool Version 1.4.3. Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/ [Accessed January 2018].RoshevitzRU (1934) Eremopoa. In: Komarov VLL (Ed.) Flora URSS, vol. 2 Gramineae Juss. Akademii Nauk SSSR, Leningrad, 1–778.RonquistFHuelsenbeckJPTeslenkoM (2011) MrBayes 3.2 Manual: Tutorials and Model Summaries [on-line]. http://mrbayes.sourceforge.net/mb3.2_manual.pdf [Accessed January 2018]SamuelssonG (1950 [1951]) In: Rechinger KH (Ed.) Zur Flora von Cypren (Reliquiae Samuelssonianae II.). Arkiv för Botanik, n.s.1(9): 417.ScholzH (1980) Eine neue Eremopoa-Art (Gramineae) aus der Turkei.10(1): 33–36.ScholzH (1981) Drei neue Gramineen aus Iran und Libyen.11(1): 95–100.SorengRJ (2003) Eremopoa Roshev. In: Soreng RJ, Peterson PM, Davidse G, Judziewicz EJ, Zuloaga FO, Filgueiras TS, Morrone (Eds) Catalogue of New World Grasses (Poaceae): IV. Subfamily Pooideae, Contributions from the United States National Herbarium 48. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., 310–311.Soreng RJ (2004+) Poa of the World. (Tropicos project). http://www.tropicos.org/ [accessed September 2018]SorengRJGillespieLJBullRD (2010) Phylogeny and reticulation in Poa based on plastid trnTLF and nrITS sequences with attention to diploids. In: Seberg O, Petersen G, Barfod AS, Davis JI (Eds) Diversity, Phylogeny and Evolution of Monocotyledons, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, 619–644.SorengRJGillespieLJConsaulLL (2017b) Taxonomy of the Poalaxa group, including two new taxa from Arctic Canada and Greenland, and Oregon, and a re-examination of P.sect.Oreinos.35: 513–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.01507SorengRJGillespieLJKobaHBoudkoEBullRD (2015b) Molecular and morphological evidence for a new grass genus, Dupontiopsis (Poaceae tribe Poeae subtribe Poinae s.l.), endemic to alpine Japan, and implications for the reticulate origin of Dupontia and Arctophila within Poinae s.l.53(2): 138–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12146SorengRJPetersonPMAnnableCR (1995) Trinius Herbarium, Komarov Botanical Institute, St. Petersberg (Guide to the microform collection).16: 1–66.SorengRJPetersonPMRomaschenkoKDavidseGTeisherJKClarkLGBarberáPGillespieLJZuloagaFO (2017a) A worldwide phylogenetic classification of the Poaceae (Gramineae) II: An update and a comparison of two 2015 classifications.55(4): 259–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12262SorengRJPetersonPMRomaschenkoKDavidseGZuloagaFOJudziewiczEJFilgueirasTSDavisJIMorroneO (2015a) A worldwide phylogenetic classification of the Poaceae (Gramineae).53(2): 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12150StapfO (1897) Poa. In: Hooker JD (Ed.) The Flora of British India 7(22). L. Reeve & Co., London, 337–346.StevensonGA (1965) Notes on the more recently adventive flora of the Brandon area, Manitoba.79: 174–177.SteudelEG (1854) Synopsis Plantarum Glumacearum, Vol. 1. J. B. Metzler, Stuttgart, 1–475.SwoffordDL (2002) PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods), version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.TriniusCB (1830) Graminum genera, quedam speciesque complures definitionibus novis. Mémoires de l’Académie Impérial des Sciences Saint-Pétersbourg, Série 6, Sciences, mathématiques, physiques et naturelles 1(4): 353–416.TriniusCB (1835) [Poaceae] In: BungeAA. ) Verzeichniss der Im Jahre 1832 im Östichen Theile Des Altai-Gebirges Gesammelten Pflanzen. Ein Supplement zur Flora Altaica.2: 523–608 [526–529].TriniusCB (1836) Graminum in hisce actis a se editorum generibus ac speciebus supplementa addit Mémoires de l’Académie Impérial des Sciences Saint-Pétersbourg, sér. 6, pt. 2 Sciences Naturelles 4, 2(1): 69–70.TutinTG (1980) Gramineae. In: TutinTGHeywoodVHBurgesNAValentineDHWaltersSMWebbDA (Eds) Flora Europaea, Vol., 118–267.TzvelevNN (1966) Ob ecology-geograicheskikh rasakh v semeistve zlakov Gramineae I ikh taxksonomischeskom range.51(8): 1104.TzvelevNN (1976) Zlaki SSSR. Nauka Publishers, Leningrad Section, Leningrad, 1–788 [English translation: 1983. Grasses of the Soviet Union, 2 vols. Amerind Publishing Co. New Delhi.]TzvelevNN (1989) The system of grasses (Poaceae) and their evolution.55(3): 141–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858328ValdésBScholzH (2006) The Euro+Med treatment of Gramineae – a generic synopsis and some new names.36(2): 657–669. https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.36.36202WatsonLDallwitzMJ (1992) CAB International, Cambridge, 1038 pp.ZhuGLiuLSorengRJOlonovaMV (2006) Poa. In: Wu C-Y, Raven PH, Hong D-Y (Eds) Flora of China, Vol. 22. Science Press, Beijing; Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, 266–309.Appendix 1
Eremopoa, Lindbergella, Poa and outgroup samples used in the phylogenetic analyses. Ingroup samples are arranged by plastid clade (pl), nuclear clade (nr) and section. Voucher information (herbarium indicated in parentheses) and country of origin are provided; where there is no collector or collector number, the herbarium specimen number is given. GenBank Accession numbers are provided for ITS, ETS, trnT-trnL-trnF, matK and rpoB-trnC sequences for each sample; those in BOLD are new to this study.
pl
nr
Section
Taxon
Voucher
Country
ITS
ETS
TLF
matK
rpoB-trnC
A
A
Alpinae
Poaalpina L.
Gillespie 6299 (CAN)
USA, Colorado
GQ324483
GQ324287
DQ353985.2
KM523888
KM524001
A
A
Alpinae
Poabadensis Haenke ex Willd.
Hajkova et al. 2004-12 (US)
Bulgaria
GQ324490
GQ324295
GQ324402
KY378861
KY378827
A
A
Alpinae
Poaligulata Boiss.
(JACA 166095)
Spain
GQ324522
GQ324346
GQ324432.2
KY378876
KY378842
A
A
Alpinae
Poathessala Boiss. & Orph.
Gillespie et al. 10400 (CAN)
Turkey
KM523802
KM523729
KM524088
KM523901
KM524014
A
A
Arenariae
Poabactrianasubsp.glabriflora (Roshev.) Tzvelev
Gauba (IRAN 21237)
Iran
KX118734
KX118716
KX118751
MH921344
MH921369
A
A
Arenariae
Poabulbosa L.
Catalan 13-2000 (UZ)
Spain
EU792388
GQ324297.2
AH015557.3
KY378863
KY378829
A
A
Arenariae
Poabulbosasubsp.vivipara (Koeler) Arcang.
Soreng & Soreng 5814 (US)
USA, Nevada (introd.)
GQ324492
GQ324298
GQ324404
MH921345
MH921370
A
A
Arenariae
PoasinaicaSteud.subsp.sinaica
Soreng & Cabi 9249 (US)
Turkey
KX118748
KX118731
KX118766
KY378886
KY378852
A
A
Arenariae
Poatimoleontis Heldr. ex Boiss.
Soreng et al. 7509-1 (US)
Greece
KX118750
KX118732
KX118768
MH921354
MH921379
E
E
Lindbergella
Lindbergellasintenisii (H. Lindb.) Bor
Hand 6102 (US)
Cyprus
MH921326
MH921310
MH921393
MH921342
MK060117
E
E
Pseudopoa
Eremopoaattalica H. Scholz
Gillespie et al. 10612 (CAN)
Turkey
MH921313
MH921297
MH921380
MH921329
MH921355
E
E
Pseudopoa
Eremopoamultiradiata (Trautv.) Roshev.
Soreng & Cabi 9240 (US)
Turkey
MH921314
MH921298
MH921381
MH921330
MH921356
E
E
Pseudopoa
Eremopoaoxyglumis (Boiss.) Roshev.
Gillespie & Levin 10313 (CAN)
Turkey
MH921316
MH921300
MH921383
MH921332
MH921358
E
E
Pseudopoa
Eremopoaoxyglumis
Gillespie et al. 10578 (CAN)
Turkey
MH921317
MH921301
MH921384
MH921333
MH921359
E
E
Pseudopoa
Eremopoaoxyglumis
Gillespie et al. 10584 (CAN)
Turkey
MH921318
MH921302
MH921385
MH921334
MH921360
E
E
Pseudopoa
Eremopoaoxyglumis
Soreng & Cabi 8855 (US)
Turkey
MH921315
MH921299
MH921382
MH921331
MH921357
E
E
Pseudopoa
Eremopoapersica (Trin.) Roshev.
Assadi & Vosoughi (TARI 24939)
Iran
MH921321
MH921305
MH921388
MH921337
MH921363
E
E
Pseudopoa
Eremopoapersica
Mozaffarian (TARI 53671)
Iran
MH921320
MH921304
MH921387
MH921336
MH921362
E
E
Pseudopoa
Eremopoapersica
Soreng & Cabi 9215 (US)
Turkey
KY378812
KY378823
KY378816
KY378879
KY378845
E
E
Pseudopoa
Eremopoapersica
Yazdanfard (IRAN 51968)
Iran
MH921319
MH921303
MH921386
MH921335
MH921361
E
E
Pseudopoa
Eremopoapersica
Mozaffarian & Nowrozi (TARI 35082)
Iran
MH921322
MH921306
MH921389
MH921338
MH921364
E
E
Pseudopoa
Eremopoasongarica (Schrenk ex Fisch. & C.A. Mey.) Roshev.
Assadi & Mozaffarian (TARI 36867)
Iran
MH921324
MH921308
MH921391
MH921340
MH921366
E
E
Pseudopoa
Eremopoasongarica
Iranshahr (IRAN 20357)
Iran
MH921323
MH921307
MH921390
MH921339
MH921365
E
E
Pseudopoa
Eremopoasongarica
Soreng & Güney 4165 (US)
Turkey
EU792400
GQ324311
DQ353988.2
KY378868
KY378834
E
E
Pseudopoa
Eremopoasongarica
Soreng & Cabi 9320 (US)
Turkey
MH921325
MH921309
MH921392
MH921341
MH921367
E
E
Speluncarae
Poaspeluncarum J.R. Edm.
Soreng et al. 8202 (US)
Turkey
MH921328
MH921312
MH921395
MH921353
MH921378
H
P+H
unclassified
Poapseudobulbosa Bor
Soreng et al. 8246 (US)
Turkey
KX118747
KX118729
KX118765
MH921352
MH921377
H
P+H
Acutifoliae
Poaplanifolia Kuntze
Peterson et al. 19233 (US)
Argentina
KM523800
KM523727
KM524087
KM523896
KM524009
H
P+H
Brizoides
Poapoiformis (Labill.) Druce
Gillespie et al. 7381 (CAN)
Australia
GQ324534
GQ324361
GQ324445
KM523897
KM524010
H
P+H
Homalopoas.l.
Poareflexa Vasey & Scribn.
Soreng 7422 (US)
USA Colorado
GQ324543
KX118730
GQ324450
KY378882
KY378848
H
P+H
Homalopoas.s.
Poaasiae-minoris H. Scholz & Byfield
Soreng et al. 8100 (US)
Turkey
MH921327
MH921311
MH921394
MH921343
MH921368
H
P+H
Homalopoas.s.
Poachaixii Vill.
Soreng 4677 (US)
Russia
EU792404
GQ324299
EU854590
KM523890
KM524003
H
P+H
Homalopoas.s.
Poachaixii
Soreng 7524 (US)
Germany
GQ324493
GQ324300
GQ324405
MH921346
MH921371
H
P+H
Homalopoas.s.
Poamasendarana Freyn & Sint.
Assadi (TARI 73254)
Iran
KX118743
KX118725
KX118761
MH921351
MH921376
H
P+H
Homalopoas.s.
Poaoccidentalis Vasey
Peterson & Valdes Rena 18918 (US)
Mexico
KU756540
KU763436
KU763514
KY378877
KY378843
H
P+H
Homalopoas.s.
Poaremota Forselles
Soreng et al. 7540 (US)
Kyrgyz Republic
GQ324545
GQ324372
GQ324452
KY378883
KY378849
H
P+H
Madropoa
Poafendleriana (Steud.) Vasey
Gillespie 6292 (CAN)
USA, Colorado
EU792403
GQ324319
DQ354027
KY378869
KY378835
H
P+H
unclassified (supersect. Homalopoa)
Poacalycina (J. Presl) Kunth
Peterson et al. 17923 (US)
Peru
EU792425
KU763395
EU792467
KY378864
KY378830
H
P+H
unclassified (supersect. Homalopoa)
Poamarshallii Tovar
Peterson et al. 21546 (US)
Peru
KM523799
KM523726
KM524086
KM523895
KM524008
J
J
Jubatae
Poajubata A. Kern.
Soreng et al. 9029-2 (US)
Turkey
KY378810
KY378820
KY378814
KY378873
KY378839
J
J
Jubatae
Poajubata
Soreng et al. 9266 (US)
Turkey
KY378811
KY378821
KY378815
KY378874
KY378840
M
M
Micrantherae
Poainfirma Kunth
Catalan 3-2000 (UZ)
Spain
GQ324516
GQ324334
GQ324427
KY378871
KY378837
M
M
Micrantherae
Poasupina Schrad.
Soreng & Cayouette 5950-2 (US)
USA, cult. (from Europe)
EU792387
GQ324383
DQ353984
KY378888
KY378854
N
N
Nanopoa
Poatrichophylla Heldr. & Sart. ex Boiss.
Soreng et al. 7508 (US)
Greece
GQ324554
GQ324386
GQ324461
KY378889
KY378855
N
N
unclassified
Poadolosa Boiss. & Heldr.
Soreng et al. 7495-1 (US)
Greece
GQ324502
GQ324312
GQ324414
KM523891
KM524004.2
N
N
unclassified
Poaiconiavar.pelasgis (H. Scholz) Soreng
Gillespie et al. 10492 (CAN)
Turkey
KX118744
KX118726
KX118762
MH898827
MH898844
N
N
unclassified
Poaursina Velen.
Stoneberg SH17 (US)
Bulgaria
GQ324527
GQ324352
GQ324437
KY378892
KY378858
N
S
Secundae
Poacurtifolia Scribn.
Soreng & Soreng 6347c-1 (US)
USA, Washington
EU792394
KY378819
DQ353994.2
KY378867
KY378833
N
S
Secundae
PoasecundaJ. Presl.subsp.secunda
Soreng & Soreng 5812 (US)
USA, Nevada
EU792393
KU763450
DQ353991
KY378884
KY378850
N
S
Secundae
Poastenantha Trin.
Soreng & Soreng 6068-1 (US)
USA, Alaska
KU756554
KU763455
DQ354057.2
KY378887
KY378853
P
P+H
Macropoa
Poadensa Troitsky
Soreng & Cabi 9306 (US)
Turkey
KX118738
KX118720
KX118755
MH921347
MH921372
P
P+H
Macropoa
Poabucharica Roshev.
Soreng et al. 7662 (US)
Kyrgyz Republic
KX118735
KX118717
KX118752
KY378862
KY378828
P
P+H
Macropoa
Poadiversifolia (Boiss. & Balansa) Hack. ex Boiss.
Table S1. Characteristics of the DNA alignments and data partitions and parameters and summary statistics of the PAUP and Bayesian analyses
(measurement/occurence/multimedia/etc.)
Five DNA sequence alignments for Poa were analysed: ETS, ITS, matK, rpoB-trnC and trnT-trnL-trnF (TLF). For each data partition (five individual markers, plastid, nuclear and combined), the number of samples and the total number of aligned characters are given. For the PAUP analyses, the following statistics are given: the number of parsimony informative (PI) characters, percentage of characters that are parsimony informative, maximum parsimony (MP) tree length (L), number of most parsimonious trees, consistency index excluding uninformative characters (CI) and retention index (RI). Parameters used and statistics of the Bayesian analyses, as determined by the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) implemented in jModeltest, are given as follows: likelihood score (-InL), number of substitution schemes, substitution rates (rAC, rAG, rAT, rCG, rCT, rGT), character state frequencies (fA, fC, fG, fT), substitution model, proportion of invariable sites and gamma shape parameter.
https://binary.pensoft.net/file/242791This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.Lynn J. Gillespie, Robert John Soreng, Evren Cabi, Neda Amiri